1. Priority Claim
This application claims the benefit of priority from European Patent Application No. 06 014256.9, filed Jul. 10, 2006, which is incorporated by reference.
2. Technical Field
This disclosure relates to noise reduction. In particular, this disclosure relates to reduction of background noise in a hands-free vehicle communication system.
3. Related Art
The voice quality of vehicle communication systems, such as wireless telephone systems, may be degraded by background noise. Spectral subtraction circuits have been used to reduce noise, but are limited to processing stationary noise perturbations and positive signal-to-noise distances.
Microphone arrays and fixed beamforming techniques have also been used to improve the quality of transmitted speech. However, use of multiple microphones or microphone arrays may be limited by spatial restrictions and cost considerations. To reduce broadband noise, a reference signal should be detected close to the source of the primary signal. However, additional reference microphones placed near the primary signal source necessarily detect portions of the desired speech signal, causing distortion and damping of the audio speech signal.
Existing hands-free communication systems in vehicle environments do not provide adequate background noise reduction. Therefore, a need exists for a background noise reduction system that reduces background noise in a vehicle environment.
A noise reduction system includes a microphone that detects an acoustic signal. A first digitizer converts an output of the microphone into a discrete output signal. An acoustic sensor detects structure-borne noise, and a second digitizer converts an output of the acoustic sensor into a discrete acoustic noise reference signal. A noise compensation circuit processes the discrete output signal based on the discrete acoustic noise reference signal to generate a noise compensated digital audio signal.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The system may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like-referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
A noise compensation filter circuit 240 may receive the digitized microphone output signal 210 and the digitized structure-borne noise reference signal 230. The noise compensation filter circuit 240 may include a linear finite impulse response filter (FIR) 246. Alternatively, the noise compensation filter circuit 240 may include an infinite impulse response filter (IIR). An infinite impulse response filter may be recursive and may have a shorter length (number of taps) than a finite impulse response filter.
Filter coefficients corresponding to the noise compensation filter circuit 240 may be adapted using a normalized least mean square (NLMS) process. The coefficients may be calculated by processes described in a publication entitled “Acoustic Echo and Noise Control,” by Hänsler and G. Schmidt. The filter adaptation process may be based on other processes, such as a recursive least mean squares process and a proportional least mean squares process. Further variations of the adaptation process may be used to ensure that the output of the filter does not diverge.
The filter coefficients may model the transfer function or impulse response of the vehicle passenger compartment or “acoustic room” 248 in which the microphone 114 is installed. The filter coefficients may be continuously adapted to provide a noise estimate signal 250 representative of the structure-borne noise reference signal 230.
A subtraction circuit 254 may subtract the noise estimate signal 250 from the digitized microphone output signal 210 to obtain a noise compensated signal 260. A noise suppression filter 266 may further enhance the quality of the noise compensated signal 260 to provide an enhanced noise compensated signal 270. The noise suppression filter 266 may be a spectral subtraction filter. In some applications, the system may include an echo compensating circuit and/or and equalizing circuit.
The enhanced noise compensated signal 270 may be transmitted to a remote communication party 272 through a communication device, such as through a wireless communication device. The remote communication party 272 may be located outside the vehicle 276. Alternatively, the remote communication party 272 may be a vehicle passenger located within the vehicle 276 so that the front-seat passenger and the rear-seat passenger may communicate with each other and/or the remote communication party 272.
The vehicle environment 306 may represent an “acoustic room,” which may exhibit audio reverberation. The microphone 308 may detect sound in the form of an acoustic signal. An A/D converter 310 may digitize an analog output 312 of the microphone 308 to generate a digitized microphone output signal y(n). The argument n denotes a discrete time index. The sampling rate of the A/D converter 310 may be selected to capture any desired frequency content. For speech, the sampling rate may be approximately 8 kHz to about 22 kHz. The digitized microphone output signal y(n) may include a digitized speech signal component s(n) generated by the utterance of the speaker. The digitized microphone output signal y(n) may also include a digitized noise component ny(n).
The noise component ny(n) may correspond to a noise source signal n(n) provided by the acoustic emission sensor 302. An analog output 314 of the acoustic emission sensor 302 may be digitized by an analog-to-digital converter 316. The noise component ny(n) may result from the transfer function or impulse response of the noise source signal n(n) based on the acoustic properties of the acoustic room. The acoustic emission sensor 302 may receive the noise source signal n(n) and may generate a digital noise reference signal x(n). The transfer function may be approximated by a discrete linear coefficient system h(n), where h(n)=h1(n), . . . , hN(n). The impulse response may be modeled by a compensation filter circuit 320.
The compensation filter circuit 320 may include a FIR filter 324 or a digital signal processor (DSP) having a plurality of filter coefficients. The DSP may execute instructions that delay an input signal one or more cycles, track frequency components of a signal, filter a signal, and/or attenuate or boost an amplitude of a signal. Alternatively, the filter or DSP may be implemented as discrete logic or circuitry, a mix of discrete logic and a processor, or may be distributed through multiple processors or software programs. The coefficients may be continuously or periodically adapted using a normalized least means squares (NLMS) process. The filter adaptation process may be based on other processes, such as a recursive least mean squares process and a proportional least mean squares process. Further variations of the adaptation process may be used to ensure that the output of the filter does not diverge.
The compensation filter circuit 320 may receive the digitized microphone output signal y(n) and the digital noise reference signal x(n). Noise compensation may be performed in the time domain or in the frequency domain. The digital noise reference signal x(n) may be correlated with the noise component ny(n) of the digitized microphone output signal y(n). The digital noise reference signal x(n) may be filtered by the FIR filter 324 to obtain a noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n).
A Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) process may be used. The digital noise reference signal x(n) may be smoothed in the time domain and/or the frequency domain.
The filter coefficients of the FIR filter 324 may adapt so that the noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n) approximates the noise component ny(n) of the digitized microphone output signal y(n). The noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n) may be estimated according to the following equation:
A subtraction circuit 330 may subtract the noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n) from the digitized microphone output signal y(n) to obtain a noise compensated signal ŝ(n).
The digital noise reference signal x(n) obtained from the acoustic emission sensor 302 may provide an estimate of the perturbation component of the audio signal. The estimated perturbation component may be subtracted from the digitized microphone output signal y(n) to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. The intelligibility of speech signals may be enhanced because non-vocal perturbations are subtracted from the digitized microphone output signal.
Each acoustic emission sensor 302 may be a vibration sensor adapted to detect rapid linear movements, such as the structure-borne noise. The acoustic emission sensor 302 may detect vibrations in a low frequency range up to about several hundred Hertz. The acoustic emission sensor 302 may be made of a plastic film, such as polyvinylidene fluoride, or may be made of a piezo-ceramic material or active fiber composite elements to detect structure-borne noise, such as impact sound. The acoustic emission sensor 302 may include a sensing pin in contact with a surface of a body, such as an engine component. The sensing pin may be resiliently urged against the surface of the body. A sound wave traveling through the body may generate a voltage potential via the sensing pin. The voltage potential may be processed to obtain the digital reference noise signal.
The acoustic emission sensor may detect noise. The digital noise reference signal x(n) generated by the acoustic emission sensor may be substantially free of speech signal components, even when positioned close to the microphone used by a speaker.
The reference microphone 602 may detect noise and may be sensitive in the frequency range below about 200 Hz. The reference microphone 602 may not be sensitive to noise in a range from about 200 Hz to about 3500 Hz, which may correspond to a portion of the intelligible speech signals. An A/D converter 620 may digitize the analog output 612 of the reference microphone 602 to generate a discrete reference microphone noise signal 630
A correlation circuit 640 may receive the digitized reference microphone noise signal 630 from the reference microphone 602. The correlation circuit 640 may separately receive a discrete output 644 provided by the A/D converter 316 corresponding to the acoustic emission sensor 302.
The correlation circuit 640 may determine a correlation between the digital microphone signal y(n) (which may contain the speech signal and the noise component), and the digitized reference microphone noise signal x(n). The correlation circuit 640 may separately determine a correlation between the digital microphone signal y(n) and the digitized output of the acoustic emission sensor x(n). The term x(n) may represent either of the noise signal sources.
The correlation circuit 640 may calculate the squared magnitude of the coherence of the digital microphone signal y(n) and the digitized reference microphone noise signal x(n) according to the following equation:
where X (ω) and Y(ω) may denote the discrete Fourier spectra of x(n) and y(n) and the asterisk may denote the complex conjugate. The Fourier transformation may be performed using a Fast Fourier Transformation, such as a Cooley-Tukey process. A similar process may be performed using the digitized output of the acoustic emission sensor.
For two arbitrary signals, a(n) and b(n), the cross power density spectrum may be represented as A*(ω) B(ω), where A(ω) and B(ω) are the Fourier spectra of a and b, respectively, ω is the frequency coordinate in frequency space, and the asterisk denotes the complex conjugate. The coherence may be given by the ratio of the cross power density spectrum and the geometric mean of the auto correlation power density spectra. The squared magnitude of the coherence of a(n) and b(n) may be determined according to the equation below:
The coherence may describe the linear functional interdependence between the two signals. If the signals are completely uncorrelated, the coherence is about zero. The maximum noise compensation that may be available by linear noise compensation filtering may be defined as 1−Cab(ω) in the frequency domain. This may represent a noise damping of about 10 dB for a coherence of about 0.9.
If the squared magnitude of the coherence value is greater than a predetermined threshold, the noise compensation filter circuit may provide the noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n) using the digitized reference microphone noise signal. If the squared magnitude of the coherence value is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold, the noise compensation filter circuit may provide the noise estimate signal {circumflex over (n)}y(n) using the digitized output of the acoustic emission sensor 644. The predetermined threshold value may be about 0.85. An amount of noise damping (measured in dB) may be proportional to the squared magnitude of the coherence value. The quality of the output of the noise compensation filter circuit 300 may increase as the coherence value increases.
In some applications, both the digitized reference microphone noise signal 630 and the digitized output of the acoustic emission sensor(s) 644 may be buffered and processed. The output of one or more of the acoustic emission sensors 302 may be processed.
The logic, circuitry, and processing described above may be encoded in a computer-readable medium such as a CDROM, disk, flash memory, RAM or ROM, an electromagnetic signal, or other machine-readable medium as instructions for execution by a processor. Alternatively or additionally, the logic may be implemented as analog or digital logic using hardware, such as one or more integrated circuits (including amplifiers, adders, delays, and filters), or one or more processors executing amplification, adding, delaying, and filtering instructions; or in software in an application programming interface (API) or in a Dynamic Link Library (DLL), functions available in a shared memory or defined as local or remote procedure calls; or as a combination of hardware and software.
The logic may be represented in (e.g., stored on or in) a computer-readable medium, machine-readable medium, propagated-signal medium, and/or signal-bearing medium. The media may comprise any device that contains, stores, communicates, propagates, or transports executable instructions for use by or in connection with an instruction executable system, apparatus, or device. The machine-readable medium may selectively be, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, or infrared signal or a semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. A non-exhaustive list of examples of a machine-readable medium includes: a magnetic or optical disk, a volatile memory such as a Random Access Memory “RAM,” a Read-Only Memory “ROM,” an Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (i.e., EPROM) or Flash memory, or an optical fiber. A machine-readable medium may also include a tangible medium upon which executable instructions are printed, as the logic may be electronically stored as an image or in another format (e.g., through an optical scan), then compiled, and/or interpreted or otherwise processed. The processed medium may then be stored in a computer and/or machine memory.
The systems may include additional or different logic and may be implemented in many different ways. A controller may be implemented as a microprocessor, microcontroller, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete logic, or a combination of other types of circuits or logic. Similarly, memories may be DRAM, SRAM, Flash, or other types of memory. Parameters (e.g., conditions and thresholds) and other data structures may be separately stored and managed, may be incorporated into a single memory or database, or may be logically and physically organized in many different ways. Programs and instruction sets may be parts of a single program, separate programs, or distributed across several memories and processors. The systems may be included in a wide variety of electronic devices, including a cellular phone, a headset, a hands-free set, a speakerphone, communication interface, or an infotainment system.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06014256 | Jul 2006 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5848163 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 411 360 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0411360 | Feb 1991 | EP |
WO 0014731 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 03017718 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080027722 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |