In the hydrocarbon recovery industry, tools can and do get stuck in the wellbore during all types of runs, be they drilling, completion, etc. Stuck tools are a source of inefficiency that cost operators significant sums of money in terms of lost days, rig time, lost production, etc. In general, once a stuck is apparent to the operator, a process to determine a depth of what is vernacularly known as the “free point” is undertaken. The free point is that point in the string that is just uphole of the stuck point. The next operation will be to create a jar as close to this point as possible while putting a left handed torque on the string in order to, hopefully, cause the string to unscrew itself right above the stuck point. This, if successfully accomplished, means that all of the string that is free will come out of the well and only leave what is stuck (the fish) behind. Avoiding having a significant amount of a string above the stuck point simplifies the fishing operation that is to follow. Unfortunately, however, this process is unreliable and therefore the art would well receive alternate systems and methods for resolving the shortcomings present in the art.
A backoff sub includes a housing; and a backoff facilitator at least partially within the housing and capable of adding energy to a system within which the sub is disposable.
A well system includes a string having a plurality of joints at least one of the joints being addressable from a remote location; and one or more backoff subs each disposed at one of the plurality of joints and capable of producing one or more of a jarring action and a backoff torque action.
A method for managing a stuck string in a wellbore includes determining a freepoint of the string; addressing a backoff sub nearest and uphole of the determined freepoint; and activating a backoff facilitator in the backoff sub.
Referring to
Each of the interconnections 16-22 is an individually addressable connection configured as a backoff sub having a backoff facilitator disposed at least partially within a housing. The facilitator is such as but not limited to an explosive backoff charge, an acoustic generator, a spark gap tool, a low pressure chamber, a piezoelectric device, a torque producer, etc. The individual sections 14 of the string 12 further include a high bandwidth communications conduit (not shown) that may be provided by, for example, utilizing a wired pipe commercially available from Grant Prideco, Houston Tex., or may be provided by utilizing an umbilical. The high bandwidth communication provided by the conduit allows for addressability at a number of places along the string, and in some embodiments, each joint of the string 12. Therefore, upon determining the location of the stuck point/free point of a string that is experiencing difficulty, a specific addressable backoff facilitator may be activated. This may occur while left hand torque is applied to the string simultaneously from a remote location (e.g. surface) or the backoff facilitator itself may create backoff torque, or both. Where only a jar is to be produced, a charge similar to those commercially available (string shot back off tool from Baker Hughes Inc., for example) for use on wireline or any other the other facilitators noted above might be employed and can be incorporated into the string 12 as its own sub, for example, screwing into the string at each joint. This is schematically illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
While the mass 52 may simply be a castellated cut at a torque drive end 72 thereof, in one embodiment, the torque drive end 72 may be configured with one or more angled faces 74 that face a counter clockwise or left have direction so that they will interact with faces 66 during actuation of the sub 40 to help produce the desired torque. Where the faces 74 are provided (as opposed to the castellated embodiment), more torque is generated due to the reduction of frictional losses at the interface between the mass 52 and the reaction pins 64. While the terms “one or more” as used above indicate that a single reaction pin 64 is contemplated and would be operative with the mass 52, more than one reaction pin 64, so that forces may be balanced perimetrically, produces a smoother more effective torque. For example, two pins 64 positioned diametrically opposed to each other (about 180 degrees apart); three pins 64 positioned about 120 degrees apart; four pins 64 positioned about 90 degrees apart; and so on where the included angle is dictated by 360 degrees divided by the number of angles represented will have the balanced result.
In order to activate the actuator 48, one embodiment includes an electronics package 80 disposed operably near the actuator 48 and in one embodiment in the cavity 50, as illustrated. The package is in communication with a wired pipe through such as a conductor 82 connected to an inductive coupling 84 that itself communicates inductively with another inductive coupling 86 across threaded connection 88. Inductive couplings 90 and 92 are provided at an opposite end of the sub 40 to maintain connectivity to other parts of the string. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the sub 40 includes signal interconnection between inductive couplings 84 and 90 although such is not specifically shown.
In a particular iteration of the torque producing embodiment disclosed herein, still referring to
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2250574 | Dodge | Jul 1941 | A |
2462477 | Edwards | Feb 1949 | A |
2670181 | Church | Feb 1954 | A |
2745345 | Sweetman | May 1956 | A |
3139933 | Golden | Jul 1964 | A |
4007790 | Henning | Feb 1977 | A |
4396065 | McKenney | Aug 1983 | A |
5220962 | Muller et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
6152222 | Kyllingstad | Nov 2000 | A |
7195069 | Roberts | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7395862 | Ross et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20040188086 | McGarian et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20080142263 | Hall et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090283322 | Dove | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090260822 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |