Backplanes with hexagonal and triangular electrodes

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11353759
  • Patent Number
    11,353,759
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 16, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 7, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Active matrix backplanes including an array of hexagonal electrodes or an array of triangular electrodes. Because the backplane designs route the gate lines along the periphery of the electrodes there is less cross talk with the surface of the electrode. The disclosed designs simplify construction and control of the electrodes and improve the regularity of the electric field above the electrode. Such backplane electrode designs may be particularly useful in electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD) devices and electrophoretic displays (EPD).
Description
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to backplanes for electro-optic displays. More specifically, it is related to non-traditional pixel shapes, such as hexagonal or triangular. Many displays (LCD and electrophoretic) use arrays of electrodes to present pixels of various colorations that are perceived by a viewer as an image. Such pixel arrays traditionally use rectangular or square electrodes, sometimes with edge structures. In this case, each electrode has four nearest neighbor electrodes joined by an edge. Because of the array structure, the pixels can be quickly and individually addressed using scan and gate lines, along with coordinated controllers. Similar structures can be used for non-display purposes, such as particle sensing and electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD).


The term “electro-optic” as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range. While this application refers to devices as electro-optic devices, generally, it is to be understood that the same structure may be used for a non-optical, i.e., non-display application, such as particle sensing or electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD).


The term “gray state” is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. For example, several of the E Ink patents and published applications referred to below describe electrophoretic displays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that an intermediate “gray state” would actually be pale blue. Indeed, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms “black” and “white” may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of a display, and should be understood as normally including extreme optical states which are not strictly black and white, for example the aforementioned white and dark blue states. The term “monochrome” may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme that only drives pixels to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.


The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in published US Patent Application No. 2002/0180687 (see also the corresponding International Application Publication No. WO 02/079869) that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.


The term “impulse” is used herein in its conventional meaning of the integral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistable electro-optic media act as charge transducers and with such media an alternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current over time (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. The appropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whether the medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulse transducer.


Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation have recently been published describing encapsulated electrophoretic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles suspended in a liquid suspension medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The technologies described in these patents and applications include:

    • (a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814;
    • (b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719;
    • (c) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564;
    • (d) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and methods used in displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. D485,294; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,252,564; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,376,828; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,506,438; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,535,197; 6,545,291; 6,639,578; 6,657,772; 6,664,944; 6,680,725; 6,683,333; 6,724,519; 6,750,473; 6,816,147; 6,819,471; 6,825,068; 6,831,769; 6,842,167; 6,842,279; 6,842,657; 6,865,010; 6,967,640; 6,980,196; 7,012,735; 7,030,412; 7,075,703; 7,106,296; 7,110,163; 7,116,318; 7,148,128; 7,167,155; 7,173,752; 7,176,880; 7,190,008; 7,206,119; 7,223,672; 7,230,751; 7,256,766; 7,259,744; 7,280,094; 7,327,511; 7,349,148; 7,352,353; 7,365,394; 7,365,733; 7,382,363; 7,388,572; 7,442,587; 7,492,497; 7,535,624; 7,551,346; 7,554,712; 7,583,427; 7,598,173; 7,605,799; 7,636,191; 7,649,674; 7,667,886; 7,672,040; 7,688,497; 7,733,335; 7,785,988; 7,843,626; 7,859,637; 7,893,435; 7,898,717; 7,957,053; 7,986,450; 8,009,344; 8,027,081; 8,049,947; 8,077,141; 8,089,453; 8,208,193; 8,373,211; 8,389,381; 8,498,042; 8,610,988; 8,728,266; 8,754,859; 8,830,560; 8,891,155; 8,969,886; 9,152,003; and 9,152,004; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0060321; 2004/0105036; 2005/0122306; 2005/0122563; 2007/0052757; 2007/0097489; 2007/0109219; 2009/0122389; 2009/0315044; 2011/0026101; 2011/0140744; 2011/0187683; 2011/0187689; 2011/0292319; 2013/0278900; 2014/0078024; 2014/0139501; 2014/0300837; 2015/0171112; 2015/0205178; 2015/0226986; 2015/0227018; 2015/0228666; and 2015/0261057; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/38000; European Patents Nos. 1,099,207 B1 and 1,145,072 B1;
    • (e) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,075,502 and 7,839,564;
    • (f) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 6,445,489; 6,504,524; 6,512,354; 6,531,997; 6,753,999; 6,825,970; 6,900,851; 6,995,550; 7,012,600; 7,023,420; 7,034,783; 7,116,466; 7,119,772; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,259,744; 7,304,787; 7,312,794; 7,327,511; 7,453,445; 7,492,339; 7,528,822; 7,545,358; 7,583,251; 7,602,374; 7,612,760; 7,679,599; 7,688,297; 7,729,039; 7,733,311; 7,733,335; 7,787,169; 7,952,557; 7,956,841; 7,999,787; 8,077,141; 8,125,501; 8,139,050; 8,174,490; 8,289,250; 8,300,006; 8,305,341; 8,314,784; 8,373,649; 8,384,658; 8,558,783; 8,558,785; 8,593,396; and 8,928,562; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2003/0102858; 2005/0253777; 2007/0091418; 2007/0103427; 2008/0024429; 2008/0024482; 2008/0136774; 2008/0291129; 2009/0174651; 2009/0179923; 2009/0195568; 2009/0322721; 2010/0220121; 2010/0265561; 2011/0193840; 2011/0193841; 2011/0199671; 2011/0285754; 2013/0063333; 2013/0194250; 2013/0321278; 2014/0009817; 2014/0085350; 2014/0240373; 2014/0253425; 2014/0292830; 2014/0333685; 2015/0070744; 2015/0109283; 2015/0213765; 2015/0221257; and 2015/0262255;
    • (g) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,118,426; 6,473,072; 6,704,133; 6,710,540; 6,738,050; 6,825,829; 7,030,854; 7,119,759; 7,312,784; and 8,009,348; 7,705,824; 8,064,962; and 8,553,012; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0090980; 2004/0119681; and 2007/0285385; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/36560; and
    • (h) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,241,921; 6,950,220; 7,420,549; 8,319,759; and 8,994,705 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0293858.


The present invention provides efficient designs for pixel arrays with non-traditional shapes that can employ traditional scan and gate lines, controllers, shift registers, etc.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The invention provides backplanes having an array of hexagonal electrodes or an array of triangular electrodes. Because the backplane designs route the gate lines along the periphery of the electrodes there is less cross talk with the surface of the electrode. These designs simplify construction and control of the electrodes and improve the regularity of the electric field above the electrode. Such electrode designs may be particularly useful in particle sensing and EWoD applications, however, there is no reason that the designs cannot be used in a more traditional display, such as an LCD display or an electrophoretic display (EPD).


A benefit of the backplane electrode structures disclosed is that they are easily coupled to standard controllers and can result in simple pinouts that are plug-and-play with existing ecosystems. This reduces the complexity of the substrates as well as interfaces with printed circuit boards, thereby reducing costs.


In one aspect, the invention provides a pixel electrode backplane including a plurality of scan lines, a plurality of gate lines, a plurality of storage capacitors, a plurality of thin film transistors, and a plurality of hexagonal electrodes. Typically, the storage capacitors are larger than 0.5 pF. In the invention, the hexagonal electrodes are arranged in a honeycomb structure, and the voltage potential of each hexagonal electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line. In some embodiments, the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller. In some embodiments, the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the hexagonal electrodes.


In another aspect, the invention provides a pixel electrode backplane including a plurality of scan lines, a plurality of gate lines, a plurality of storage capacitors, a plurality of thin film transistors, and a plurality of triangular electrodes. Typically, the storage capacitors are larger than 0.5 pF. In the invention, two triangular electrodes or four triangular electrodes are arranged as a square and the voltage potential of each triangular electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line. In some embodiments, the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller. In some embodiments, the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes. In some embodiments, the scan lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes.


The functionality of the backplane electrodes can be expanded by disposing a dielectric layer over the pixel electrodes, as well as a hydrophobic layer over the dielectric layer. Such coated pixel electrode backplanes can be incorporated into microfluidic devices by adding a light-transmissive electrode and a spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode.


In other embodiments, the backplane electrodes can be the basis for controlling an electrophoretic display (EPD) by adding a light-transmissive electrode and disposing an electrophoretic medium (typically charged particles in a non-polar solvent) between the backplane electrodes and the light-transmissive electrode.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a plurality of hexagonal electrodes arranged in a honeycomb. The invention provides for easy fabrication of such an array while providing simple individual control of each hexagonal pixel with a scan line and a gate line.



FIG. 2 illustrates the driving details the hexagonal array, including gate lines (Gn), scan lines (Sn), thin film transistors, and storage capacitors.



FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of the pixel electronics for a hexagonal electrode;



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate an embodiment of a backplane using the hexagonal electrode architecture of the invention. The embodiment of FIG. 4A includes 217×164=35,588 pixel electrodes, a gate controller with 825 channels output mode, and a data controller with 800 channels output mode.



FIG. 5 shows a first embodiment of an array of triangular electrodes where electrodes A and B form a square.



FIG. 6 shows a second embodiment of an array of triangular electrodes where electrodes A, B, C, and D form a square.



FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a backplane using the triangular electrode architecture of the invention. The embodiment of FIG. 7A includes 374×163=60,962 pixel electrodes, a gate controller with 825 channels output mode, and a data controller with 800 channels output mode.



FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a backplane using the triangular electrode architecture of the invention.



FIG. 9 depicts the movement of an aqueous-phase droplet between adjacent electrodes by providing differing charge states on adjacent electrodes. In FIG. 9, a negative charge is induced in a liquid at the liquid/dielectric interface above a (lower) electrode receiving an AC signal, while a positive charge is induced when negative voltage is applied to an opposing (upper) electrode. (This figure shows instant that the leftmost electrode is positively charged during the AC cycle.) As shown in FIG. 9, a pixel always has opposite charge to the induced charge at the droplet interface.



FIG. 10 shows a TFT architecture for a plurality of propulsion electrodes of an EWoD device of the invention.



FIG. 11 is a general depiction of an electrophoretic medium, suitable for use with a backplane of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention provides for arrays of hexagonal and triangular electrodes that individually addressable with conventional scan/gate driving. Such arrays may be useful in creating displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCD) or electrophoretic displays (EPD). Such arrays may also be useful in non-display applications, such as particle (e.g., photon) sensors or electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD), which may be used for microfluidic applications such as lab-on-a chip assays.


Creating digital pictures requires the ability to address individual spatial elements (pixels) quickly. In some instances, each pixel is its own color source (e.g., full color electrophoretic displays described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,921,451), in other instances, several sub-pixels act in concert to give the illusion of a range of colors for the pixel. While it is possible to wire each pixel to control the voltage state individually, it is more common to provide an array of non-linear elements, such as transistors or diodes, with at least one non-linear element associated with each pixel (or sub-pixel), to produce an “active matrix” display. An addressing or pixel electrode, which addresses one pixel, is connected to an appropriate voltage source through the associated non-linear element. Typically, when the non-linear element is a transistor, the pixel electrode is connected to the drain of the transistor, and this arrangement will be assumed in the following description, although it is essentially arbitrary and the pixel electrode could be connected to the source of the transistor. Conventionally, in high-resolution arrays, the pixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, such that any specific pixel is uniquely defined by the intersection of one specified row and one specified column. The sources of all the transistors in each column are connected to a single column electrode, while the gates of all the transistors in each row are connected to a single row electrode; again, the assignment of sources to rows and gates to columns is conventional but essentially arbitrary, and could be reversed if desired. The row electrodes are connected to a row driver, which essentially ensures that at any given moment only one row is selected, i.e., that there is applied to the selected row electrode a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in the selected row are conductive, while there is applied to all other rows a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in these non-selected rows remain non-conductive. The column electrodes are connected to column drivers, which place upon the various column electrodes voltages selected to drive the pixels in the selected row to their desired optical states. (The aforementioned voltages are relative to a common front electrode that is conventionally provided on the opposed side of the electro-optic medium from the non-linear array and extends across the whole display.) After a pre-selected interval known as the “line address time” the selected row is deselected, the next row is selected, and the voltages on the column drivers are changed to that the next line of the display is written. This process is repeated so that the entire display is written in a row-by-row manner. (Throughout this document, the gate lines are horizontal and the scan lines are vertical.) Because driving electronics are typically arranged as a matrix, the pixel electrodes coupled to the driving electronics are commonly square or rectangular and arranged in a rectangular array in order to maximize the area covered by the electrodes.


Processes for manufacturing active matrix displays are well established. Thin-film transistors, for example, can be fabricated using various deposition and photolithography techniques. A transistor includes a gate electrode, an insulating dielectric layer, a semiconductor layer and source and drain electrodes. Application of a voltage to the gate electrode provides an electric field across the dielectric layer, which dramatically increases the source-to-drain conductivity of the semiconductor layer. This change permits electrical conduction between the source and the drain electrodes. Typically, the gate electrode, the source electrode, and the drain electrode are patterned. In general, the semiconductor layer is also patterned in order to minimize stray conduction (i.e., cross-talk) between neighboring circuit elements.


Liquid crystal displays commonly employ amorphous silicon (“a-Si”), thin-film transistors (“TFTs”) as switching devices for display pixels. Such TFTs typically have a bottom-gate configuration. Within one pixel, a thin film capacitor typically holds a charge transferred by the switching TFT. Electrophoretic displays can use similar TFTs with capacitors, although the function of the capacitors differs somewhat from those in liquid crystal displays; see the aforementioned copending application Ser. No. 09/565,413, and Publications 2002/0106847 and 2002/0060321. Thin film transistors can be fabricated to provide high performance. Fabrication processes, however, can result in significant cost.


In TFT addressing arrays, pixel electrodes are charged via the TFTs during a line address time. During the line address time, a TFT is switched to a conducting state by changing an applied gate voltage. For example, for an n-type TFT, a gate voltage is switched to a “high” state to switch the TFT into a conducting state.


It should be appreciated that the backplanes described herein may be extended to an electro-optic display comprising a layer of electro-optic medium disposed on the backplane and covering the pixel electrode. Such an electro-optic display may use any of the types of electro-optic medium previously discussed; for example, the electro-optic medium may be a liquid crystal, a rotating bichromal member or electrochromic medium, or an electrophoretic medium, preferably an encapsulated electrophoretic medium. In some embodiments, when an electrophoretic medium is utilized, a plurality of charged particles can move through a suspending fluid under the influence of an electric field. Such electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays.


The backplanes described herein may also be used for electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD). An EWoD device typically includes a cell filled with an oil and at least one aqueous droplet. The cell gap is typically in the range 50 to 200 μm, but the gap can be larger. In a basic configuration, a plurality of propulsion electrodes (pixels) are disposed on one substrate and a singular top electrode is disposed on the opposing surface. The cell additionally includes hydrophobic coatings on the surfaces contacting the oil layer, as well as a dielectric layer between the propulsion electrodes and the hydrophobic coating. (The upper substrate may also include a dielectric layer). The hydrophobic layer prevents the droplet from wetting the surface. When no voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the droplet will maintain a spheroidal shape to minimize contact with the hydrophobic surfaces (oil and hydrophobic layer). Because the droplets do not wet the surface, they are less likely to contaminate the surface or interact with other droplets except when that behavior is desired. By individually addressing the electrodes in the active matrix, it is possible to move droplets of water, split the droplets, and merge droplets. Because the water droplets are compatible with biological molecules, it is possible to perform bioassays on minute quantities of samples. Conventional rectangular arrays can limit functionality in EWoD devices, because the only options are up/down/left/right whereas a hexagonal electrode of the invention has six nearest neighbor electrodes for more directions of movement and forces can be applied at 60°, 120° and linearly.



FIG. 1 illustrates a top view of an array of hexagonal electrodes 100. FIG. 1 is arranged as a traditional honeycomb; however, the other repeating structures are possible. Additionally, each hexagon electrode need not be regular in that each side and each angle are the same.



FIG. 2 is an overhead view of the driving electronics as arranged for a hexagonal array of the invention. As shown in FIG. 2, each hexagonal electrode includes a thin-film transistor (TFT) 205 and a storage capacitor 210. Gate lines 220 and scan lines 225, as discussed above control the TFT 205. Notably, in the arrangement of the invention, the gate lines travel parallel to the perimeter of the hexagonal electrodes. This allows each hexagonal electrode to be addressed by a gate line and a scan line, as would typically be arranged in a backplane, and controlled by a gate controller and a scan controller (see FIG. 4A). Because the gate lines are running along the perimeter of the electrodes (and not under), the electric field on the electrode is more consistent across the surface of the electrode. This feature is especially useful when the hexagonal electrodes are larger (i.e., on the order of 500 μm) and field inconsistencies can affect the performance of the device (i.e., stopping a droplet, or showing a wrong color).


The layout of the controller for the hexagonal array is shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, including gate and scan controllers. As illustrated in FIG. 4A, more than 30,000 electrodes can be arrayed on a 5 cm×5 cm backplane using commercially available scan and gate controllers. [See for example, scan and gate controllers from MK electric (Taipei, Taiwan).] Using hexagonal electrodes of approximately 235 μm is easily accomplished with a separation between hexagonal electrodes of around 5 μm. Of course, this layout could be made larger or smaller, for example, the backplane could include between 5,000 and 500,000 electrodes. Additionally, the hexagonal electrodes can be larger or smaller, i.e., between 50 μm and 1 mm. The individual TFTs can be controlled with gate lines 420 and scan lines 425 as shown in FIG. 4B.



FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate top views of arrays of triangular electrodes. FIG. 5 shows a first embodiment of triangular electrodes where two electrodes “A” and “B” create a square feature. FIG. 6 shows a second embodiment of triangular electrodes where four electrodes “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” create a square feature. It is possible that other configurations of triangular electrodes may be made that create a square. Like the hexagonal arrays described above, the arrays of FIGS. 5 and 6 can be used in both display and non-display applications.



FIGS. 7A and 7B show an overhead view of the driving electronics as arranged for a hexagonal array of the invention. As shown in FIG. 7B, each hexagonal electrode includes a TFT 705 and a storage capacitor 710. Gate lines 720 and scan lines 725, as discussed above control the TFT 705. Notably, in the arrangement of the invention, the gate and scan lines travel parallel to the perimeter of the triangular electrodes. This allows each triangular electrode to be addressed by a gate line and a scan line, as would typically be arranged in a backplane, and controlled by a gate controller and a scan controller. Because the gate and scan lines are running along the perimeter of the electrodes (and not under), the electric field on the electrode is more consistent across the surface of the electrode. This feature is especially useful when the triangular electrodes are larger (i.e., on the order of 500 μm) and field inconsistencies can affect the performance of the device (i.e., stopping a droplet, or showing a wrong color).


The layout of the controller for the triangular array is also shown in FIG. 7A, including gate and scan controllers. As illustrated in FIG. 7A, more than 60,000 electrodes can be arrayed on a 5 cm×5 cm backplane using commercially available scan and gate controllers. Using triangular electrodes of approximately 150 μm is easily accomplished with a separation between triangular electrodes of around 5 μm. Of course, this layout could be made larger or smaller, for example, the backplane could include between 5,000 and 500,000 electrodes. Additionally, the triangular electrodes can be larger or smaller, i.e., between 50 μm and 1 mm. An alternative arrangement of triangular electrodes is shown in FIG. 8, where the gate lines 820 and scan lines 825 are perpendicular.


Of course the arrangements of the electrodes in the figures is exemplary, and the geometrical dimensions of the pixel electrode and/or the gate line and/or scan lines can be modified for special applications or as the number of pixels is limited by available scan controllers or backplane size. For example, the size of the pixel electrode may be reduced to enlarge the gap space between the electrode and the data line. In some other embodiments, the electrical properties of the material between the pixel electrode and the data line may be altered to reduce crosstalk. For example, one may increase the thickness of the insulating thin film between the pixel electrode and its neighboring data lines to reduce capacitive coupling.


In some embodiments, backplanes of the invention can be incorporated into an electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD) device including a backplane of the invention coupled to a light-transmissive electrode and separated by a spacer. The fundamental operation of an EWoD device is illustrated in the sectional image of FIG. 9. The EWoD 900 includes a cell filled with an oil 902 and at least one aqueous droplet 904. The cell gap is defined by a spacer (not shown) but typically, in the range 50 to 200 μm, however the gap can be larger. In a basic configuration, as shown in FIG. 9, a plurality of propulsion electrodes 905 are disposed on one substrate and a singular light-transmissive top electrode 906 is disposed on the opposing surface. The cell additionally includes hydrophobic coatings 907 on the surfaces contacting the oil layer, as well as a dielectric layer 908 between the propulsion electrodes 905 and the hydrophobic coating 907. (The upper substrate may also include a dielectric layer, but it is not shown in FIG. 9). The hydrophobic layer prevents the droplet from wetting the surface. When no voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the droplet will maintain a spheroidal shape to minimize contact with the hydrophobic surfaces (oil and hydrophobic layer). Because the droplets do not wet the surface, they are less likely to contaminate the surface or interact with other droplets except when that behavior is desired.


The dielectric 908 must be thin enough and have a dielectric constant compatible with low voltage AC driving, such as available from conventional image controllers for LCD displays. For example, the dielectric layer may comprise a layer of approximately 20-40 nm SiO2 topped over-coated with 200-400 nm plasma-deposited silicon nitride. Alternatively, the dielectric may comprise atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3 between 2 and 100 nm thick, preferably between 20 and 60 nm thick. The TFT is constructed by creating alternating layers of differently-doped a-Si structures along with various electrode lines, with methods know to those of skill in the art. The hydrophobic layer 907 can be constructed from materials such as Teflon® AF (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.) and FlurorPel™ coatings from Cytonix (Beltsville, Md.), which can be spin coated over the dielectric layer 908.


While it is possible to have a single layer for both the dielectric and hydrophobic functions, such layers typically require thick inorganic layers (to prevent pinholes) with resulting low dielectric constants, thereby requiring more than 100V for droplet movement. To achieve low voltage actuation, it is better to have a thin inorganic layer for high capacitance and to be pinhole free, topped by a thin organic hydrophobic layer. With this combination, it is possible to have electrowetting operation with voltages in the range +/−10 to +/−50V, which is in the range that can be supplied by conventional TFT arrays.


When a voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the voltage on one electrode attracts opposite charges in the droplet at the dielectric-to-droplet interface, and the droplet moves toward this electrode, as illustrated in FIG. 2. The voltages needed for acceptable droplet propulsion depend on the properties of the dielectric and hydrophobic layers. AC driving is used to reduce degradation of the droplets, dielectrics, and electrodes by various electrochemistries. Operational frequencies for EWoD can be in the range 100 Hz to 1 MHz, but lower frequencies of 1 kHz or lower are preferred for use with TFTs that have limited speed of operation.


As shown in FIG. 9, the top electrode 906 is a single conducting layer normally set to zero volts or a common voltage value (VCOM) to take into account offset voltages on the propulsion electrodes 905 due to capacitive kickback from the TFTs that are used to switch the voltage on the electrodes (see FIG. 10). The top electrode can also have a square wave applied to increase the voltage across the liquid. Such an arrangement allows lower propulsion voltages to be used for the TFT connected propulsion electrodes 905 because the top plate voltage 906 is additional to the voltage supplied by the TFT.


As shown in FIG. 10, an active matrix of propulsion electrodes (hexagonal or trigonal or some other shape) can be arranged to be driven with data and gate (select) lines much like an active matrix in a liquid crystal display (LCD). However, unlike an LCD, storage capacitors of the invention typically have a much higher capacitance, as required for electrophoretic displays and electrowetting on dielectric devices. For example, each storage capacitor in an array of backplane electrodes is typically greater than 0.1 pF (picoFarad), e.g., greater than 0.5 pF, e.g., greater than 1 pF, e.g., greater than 2 pF, e.g., greater than 5 pF, e.g., greater than 10 pF, e.g., greater than 50 pF, e.g., greater than 100 pF.


In EWoD applications, the gate (select) lines are scanned for line-at-a time addressing, while the data lines carry the voltage to be transferred to propulsion electrodes for electrowetting operation. If no movement is needed, or if a droplet is meant to move away from a propulsion electrode, then 0V will be applied to that (non-target) propulsion electrode. If a droplet is meant to move toward a propulsion electrode, an AC voltage will be applied to that (target) propulsion electrode.


An exemplary electrophoretic display (EPD) incorporating a pixel electrode backplane of the invention is show in FIG. 11. Display 1100 normally comprises a layer of electrophoretic material 1130 and at least two other layers 1110 and 1120 disposed on opposed sides of the electrophoretic material 1130, at least one of these two layers being a light-transmissive electrode layer, e.g., as depicted by layer 1110 in FIG. 11. The light-transmissive electrode 1110 may be a transparent conductor, such as Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) (which in some cases may be deposited onto a transparent substrate, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET)). Such EPDs also include, as illustrated in FIG. 11, a backplane 1150, comprising a plurality of driving electrodes 1153 and a substrate layer 1157. The layer of electrophoretic material 1130 may include microcapsules 1133, holding electrophoretic pigment particles 1135 and 1137 and a solvent, with the microcapsules 1133 dispersed in a polymeric binder 1139. Nonetheless, it is understood that the electrophoretic medium (particles 1135 and 1137 and solvent) may be enclosed in microcells (microcups) or distributed in a polymer without a surrounding microcapsule (e.g., PDEPID design described above). Typically, the pigment particles 1137 and 1135 are controlled (displaced) with an electric field produced between the front electrode 1110 and the pixel electrodes 1153. In many conventional EPDs, the electrical driving waveforms are transmitted to the pixel electrodes 1153 via conductive traces (not shown) that are coupled to thin-film transistors (TFTs) that allow the pixel electrodes to be addressed in a row-column addressing scheme. In some embodiments, the front electrode 1110 is merely grounded and the image driven by providing positive and negative potentials to the pixel electrodes 1153, which are individually addressable. In other embodiments, a potential may also be applied to the front electrode 1110 to provide a greater variation in the fields that can be provided between the front electrode and the pixel electrodes 1153.


From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention can provide a backplane with arrays of hexagonal or triangular electrodes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made to the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.

Claims
  • 1. A microfluidic device comprising: a pixel electrode backplane defining a plurality of hexagonal cells comprising:a plurality of scan lines;a plurality of gate lines;a plurality of storage capacitors having a capacitance greater than 0.5 pF;a plurality of thin film transistors; anda plurality of hexagonal propulsion electrodes having a dielectric coating over the plurality of hexagonal propulsion electrodes and a first hydrophobic layer disposed on the dielectric coating, the hexagonal propulsion electrodes being arranged in a honeycomb structure, and each hexagonal propulsion electrode being operatively coupled to a storage capacitor and a thin film transistor, wherein the voltage potential of each hexagonal propulsion electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line;a light-transmissive electrode having a second hydrophobic layer disposed on the light-transmissive electrode;an oil layer in contact with the first hydrophobic layer and the second hydrophobic layer; anda spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode,wherein the microfluidic device is configured to move aqueous droplets distributed in the oil layer between three or more of the plurality of hexagonal cells.
  • 2. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller, and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller.
  • 3. The microfluidic device of claim 2, wherein the pixel electrode backplane is substantially rectangular in shape, and the scan controller is disposed along a first edge of the pixel electrode backplane and the gate controller is disposed along a second edge of the pixel electrode backplane.
  • 4. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the hexagonal propulsion electrodes.
  • 5. The microfluidic device of claim 4, wherein the scan lines are routed perpendicular to the gate lines.
  • 6. A microfluidic device comprising: a pixel electrode backplane defining a plurality of triangular cells comprising:a plurality of scan lines;a plurality of gate lines;a plurality of storage capacitors having a capacitance greater than 0.5 pF;a plurality of thin film transistors; anda plurality of triangular propulsion electrodes having a dielectric coating over the plurality of triangular propulsion electrodes and a first hydrophobic layer disposed on the dielectric coating, each triangular propulsion electrode being operatively coupled to a storage capacitor and a thin film transistor, wherein four triangular propulsion electrodes are arranged as a square and the voltage potential of each triangular propulsion electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line;a light-transmissive electrode having a second hydrophobic layer disposed on the light-transmissive electrode;an oil layer in contact with the first hydrophobic layer and the second hydrophobic layer; anda spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode,wherein the microfluidic device is configured to move aqueous droplets distributed in the oil layer between three or more of the plurality of triangular cells.
  • 7. The microfluidic device of claim 6 wherein the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller, and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller.
  • 8. The microfluidic device of claim 7, wherein the pixel electrode backplane is substantially rectangular in shape, and the scan controller is disposed along a first edge of the pixel electrode backplane and the gate controller is disposed along a second edge of the pixel electrode backplane.
  • 9. The microfluidic device of claim 6, wherein the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes.
  • 10. The microfluidic device of claim 9, wherein the scan lines are routed perpendicular to the gate lines.
  • 11. The microfluidic device of claim 6, wherein the scan lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular propulsion electrodes.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/732,421, filed Sep. 17, 2018. All references, patents, and patent applications disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (397)
Number Name Date Kind
4573995 Chen et al. Mar 1986 A
4708716 Sibalis Nov 1987 A
5080646 Theeuwes et al. Jan 1992 A
5311337 McCartney, Jr. May 1994 A
5535028 Bae Jul 1996 A
5930026 Jacobson et al. Jul 1999 A
6046790 Hara Apr 2000 A
6118426 Albert et al. Sep 2000 A
6124851 Jacobson Sep 2000 A
6130773 Jacobson et al. Oct 2000 A
6177921 Comiskey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6232950 Albert et al. May 2001 B1
6241921 Jacobson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252564 Albert et al. Jun 2001 B1
6312304 Duthaler et al. Nov 2001 B1
6312971 Amundson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6376828 Comiskey Apr 2002 B1
6392786 Albert May 2002 B1
6413790 Duthaler et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422687 Jacobson Jul 2002 B1
6445374 Albert et al. Sep 2002 B2
6445489 Jacobson et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473072 Comiskey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480182 Turner et al. Nov 2002 B2
6498114 Amundson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504524 Gates et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506438 Duthaler et al. Jan 2003 B2
6512354 Jacobson Jan 2003 B2
6518949 Drzaic Feb 2003 B2
6521489 Duthaler et al. Feb 2003 B2
6531997 Gates et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535197 Comiskey et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545291 Amundson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6611107 Mikami et al. Aug 2003 B2
6639578 Comiskey et al. Oct 2003 B1
6657772 Loxley Dec 2003 B2
6664944 Albert et al. Dec 2003 B1
D485294 Albert Jan 2004 S
6680725 Jacobson Jan 2004 B1
6683333 Kazlas et al. Jan 2004 B2
6704133 Gates et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710540 Albert et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724519 Comiskey et al. Apr 2004 B1
6738050 Comiskey et al. May 2004 B2
6750473 Amundson et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753999 Zehner et al. Jun 2004 B2
6816147 Albert Nov 2004 B2
6819471 Amundson et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825068 Denis et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825829 Albert et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825970 Goenaga et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831769 Holman et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842167 Albert et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842279 Amundson Jan 2005 B2
6842657 Drzaic et al. Jan 2005 B1
6865010 Duthaler et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873452 Tseng et al. Mar 2005 B2
6900851 Morrison et al. May 2005 B2
6909532 Chung et al. Jun 2005 B2
6922276 Zhang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6950220 Abramson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6967640 Albert et al. Nov 2005 B2
6980196 Turner et al. Dec 2005 B1
6982178 LeCain et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995550 Jacobson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002728 Pullen et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012600 Zehner et al. Mar 2006 B2
7012735 Honeyman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023420 Comiskey et al. Apr 2006 B2
7030412 Drzaic et al. Apr 2006 B1
7030854 Baucom et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034783 Gates et al. Apr 2006 B2
7061166 Kuniyasu Jun 2006 B2
7061662 Chung et al. Jun 2006 B2
7075502 Drzaic et al. Jul 2006 B1
7075703 O'Neil et al. Jul 2006 B2
7106296 Jacobson Sep 2006 B1
7110163 Webber et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116318 Amundson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7116466 Whitesides et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119759 Zehner et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119772 Amundson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7148128 Jacobson Dec 2006 B2
7163612 Sterling et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167155 Albert et al. Jan 2007 B1
7170670 Webber Jan 2007 B2
7173752 Doshi et al. Feb 2007 B2
7176880 Amundson et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177066 Chung et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190008 Amundson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193625 Danner et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202847 Gates Apr 2007 B2
7206119 Honeyman et al. Apr 2007 B2
7223672 Kazlas et al. May 2007 B2
7230751 Whitesides et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242514 Chung et al. Jul 2007 B2
7256766 Albert et al. Aug 2007 B2
7259744 Arango et al. Aug 2007 B2
7280094 Albert Oct 2007 B2
7301693 Chaug et al. Nov 2007 B2
7304780 Liu et al. Dec 2007 B2
7304787 Whitesides et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312784 Baucom et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312794 Zehner et al. Dec 2007 B2
7327346 Chung et al. Feb 2008 B2
7327511 Whitesides et al. Feb 2008 B2
7347957 Wu et al. Mar 2008 B2
7349148 Doshi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7352353 Albert et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365394 Denis et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365733 Duthaler et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382363 Albert et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388572 Duthaler et al. Jun 2008 B2
7401758 Liang et al. Jul 2008 B2
7408699 Wang et al. Aug 2008 B2
7411719 Paolini, Jr. et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420549 Jacobson et al. Sep 2008 B2
7442587 Amundson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7453445 Amundson Nov 2008 B2
7471274 Kim Dec 2008 B2
7492339 Amundson Feb 2009 B2
7492497 Paolini, Jr. et al. Feb 2009 B2
7528822 Amundson et al. May 2009 B2
7535624 Amundson et al. May 2009 B2
7545358 Gates et al. Jun 2009 B2
7551346 Fazel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7554712 Patry et al. Jun 2009 B2
7560004 Pereira et al. Jul 2009 B2
7583251 Arango et al. Sep 2009 B2
7583427 Danner et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598173 Ritenour et al. Oct 2009 B2
7602374 Zehner et al. Oct 2009 B2
7605799 Amundson et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612760 Kawai Nov 2009 B2
7636191 Duthaler Dec 2009 B2
7649674 Danner et al. Jan 2010 B2
7667886 Danner et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672040 Sohn et al. Mar 2010 B2
7679599 Kawai Mar 2010 B2
7679813 Liang et al. Mar 2010 B2
7679814 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683606 Kang et al. Mar 2010 B2
7688297 Zehner et al. Mar 2010 B2
7688497 Danner et al. Mar 2010 B2
7705824 Baucom et al. Apr 2010 B2
7729039 LeCain et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733311 Amundson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733335 Zehner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7785988 Amundson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787169 Abramson et al. Aug 2010 B2
7830592 Sprague et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839564 Whitesides et al. Nov 2010 B2
7843626 Amundson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7859637 Amundson et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859742 Chiu et al. Dec 2010 B1
7880958 Zang et al. Feb 2011 B2
7893435 Kazlas et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898717 Patry et al. Mar 2011 B2
7905977 Qi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7952557 Amundson et al. May 2011 B2
7956841 Albert et al. Jun 2011 B2
7957053 Honeyman et al. Jun 2011 B2
7982479 Wang et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986450 Cao et al. Jul 2011 B2
7999787 Amundson et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009344 Danner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8009348 Zehner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8027081 Danner et al. Sep 2011 B2
8049947 Danner et al. Nov 2011 B2
8064962 Wilcox et al. Nov 2011 B2
8072675 Lin et al. Dec 2011 B2
8077141 Duthaler et al. Dec 2011 B2
8089453 Comiskey et al. Jan 2012 B2
8120836 Lin et al. Feb 2012 B2
8125501 Amundson et al. Feb 2012 B2
8139050 Jacobson et al. Mar 2012 B2
8149228 Lin et al. Apr 2012 B2
8159636 Sun et al. Apr 2012 B2
8159644 Takatori Apr 2012 B2
8173000 Hadwen et al. May 2012 B1
8174490 Whitesides et al. May 2012 B2
8208193 Patry et al. Jun 2012 B2
8237892 Sprague et al. Aug 2012 B1
8238021 Sprague et al. Aug 2012 B2
8243013 Sprague et al. Aug 2012 B1
8274472 Wang et al. Sep 2012 B1
8289250 Zehner et al. Oct 2012 B2
8300006 Zhou et al. Oct 2012 B2
8305341 Arango et al. Nov 2012 B2
8314784 Ohkami et al. Nov 2012 B2
8319759 Jacobson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8362488 Chaug et al. Jan 2013 B2
8373211 Amundson et al. Feb 2013 B2
8373649 Low et al. Feb 2013 B2
8384658 Albert et al. Feb 2013 B2
8389381 Amundson et al. Mar 2013 B2
8395836 Lin Mar 2013 B2
8419273 Hadwen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8437069 Lin May 2013 B2
8441414 Lin May 2013 B2
8456414 Lin et al. Jun 2013 B2
8456589 Sprague et al. Jun 2013 B1
8462102 Wong et al. Jun 2013 B2
8498042 Danner et al. Jul 2013 B2
8514168 Chung et al. Aug 2013 B2
8525966 Takatori Sep 2013 B2
8529743 Kim et al. Sep 2013 B2
8537105 Chiu et al. Sep 2013 B2
8547111 Hadwen et al. Oct 2013 B2
8547628 Wu et al. Oct 2013 B2
8553012 Baucom et al. Oct 2013 B2
8558783 Wilcox et al. Oct 2013 B2
8558785 Zehner et al. Oct 2013 B2
8558786 Lin Oct 2013 B2
8558855 Sprague et al. Oct 2013 B2
8576162 Kang et al. Nov 2013 B2
8576164 Sprague et al. Nov 2013 B2
8576259 Lin et al. Nov 2013 B2
8593396 Amundson et al. Nov 2013 B2
8605032 Liu et al. Dec 2013 B2
8610988 Zehner et al. Dec 2013 B2
8643595 Chung et al. Feb 2014 B2
8653832 Hadwen et al. Feb 2014 B2
8654571 John et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665206 Lin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8681191 Yang et al. Mar 2014 B2
8714780 Ho et al. May 2014 B2
8728266 Danner et al. May 2014 B2
8730153 Sprague et al. May 2014 B2
8743077 Sprague Jun 2014 B1
8754859 Gates et al. Jun 2014 B2
8764958 Wang Jul 2014 B2
8791891 Van Dijk et al. Jul 2014 B2
8797258 Sprague Aug 2014 B2
8797633 Sprague et al. Aug 2014 B1
8797636 Yang et al. Aug 2014 B2
8810525 Sprague Aug 2014 B2
8810882 Heikenfeld et al. Aug 2014 B2
8815070 Wang et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828336 Hadwen et al. Sep 2014 B2
8830560 Danner et al. Sep 2014 B2
8853645 Okada et al. Oct 2014 B2
8891155 Danner et al. Nov 2014 B2
8928562 Gates et al. Jan 2015 B2
8928641 Chiu et al. Jan 2015 B2
8958044 Takatori Feb 2015 B2
8969886 Amundson Mar 2015 B2
8976444 Zhang et al. Mar 2015 B2
8980075 Cheng et al. Mar 2015 B2
8994705 Jacobson et al. Mar 2015 B2
9013394 Lin Apr 2015 B2
9019197 Lin Apr 2015 B2
9019198 Lin et al. Apr 2015 B2
9019318 Sprague et al. Apr 2015 B2
9025234 Lin May 2015 B2
9025238 Chan et al. May 2015 B2
9030374 Sprague et al. May 2015 B2
9082352 Cheng et al. Jul 2015 B2
9140952 Sprague et al. Sep 2015 B2
9147364 Wu et al. Sep 2015 B2
9152003 Danner et al. Oct 2015 B2
9152004 Paolini, Jr. et al. Oct 2015 B2
9171508 Sprague et al. Oct 2015 B2
9201279 Wu et al. Dec 2015 B2
9216414 Chu Dec 2015 B2
9218773 Sun et al. Dec 2015 B2
9223164 Lai et al. Dec 2015 B2
9224338 Chan et al. Dec 2015 B2
9224342 Sprague et al. Dec 2015 B2
9224344 Chung et al. Dec 2015 B2
9230492 Harrington et al. Jan 2016 B2
9245484 Yamazaki et al. Jan 2016 B2
9251736 Lin et al. Feb 2016 B2
9262973 Wu et al. Feb 2016 B2
9269311 Amundson Feb 2016 B2
9285648 Liu et al. Mar 2016 B2
9299294 Lin et al. Mar 2016 B2
9310661 Wu et al. Apr 2016 B2
9336731 Long et al. May 2016 B2
9373289 Sprague et al. Jun 2016 B2
9390066 Smith et al. Jul 2016 B2
9390661 Chiu et al. Jul 2016 B2
9412314 Amundson et al. Aug 2016 B2
9419024 Ritenour et al. Aug 2016 B2
9454057 Wu et al. Sep 2016 B2
9458543 Hadwen Oct 2016 B2
9460666 Sprague et al. Oct 2016 B2
9495918 Harrington et al. Nov 2016 B2
9501981 Lin et al. Nov 2016 B2
9513743 Sjodin et al. Dec 2016 B2
9514667 Lin Dec 2016 B2
9529240 Paolini, Jr. et al. Dec 2016 B2
9542895 Gates et al. Jan 2017 B2
9564088 Wilcox et al. Feb 2017 B2
9582041 Cheng et al. Feb 2017 B2
9612502 Danner et al. Apr 2017 B2
9620048 Sim et al. Apr 2017 B2
9620066 Bishop Apr 2017 B2
9620067 Harrington et al. Apr 2017 B2
9632373 Huang et al. Apr 2017 B2
9666142 Hung May 2017 B2
9671635 Paolini, Jr. Jun 2017 B2
9672766 Sjodin Jun 2017 B2
9679185 Chin Jun 2017 B2
9691333 Cheng et al. Jun 2017 B2
9721495 Harrington et al. Aug 2017 B2
9778500 Gates et al. Oct 2017 B2
9792861 Chang et al. Oct 2017 B2
9792862 Hung et al. Oct 2017 B2
9805668 Agostinelli et al. Oct 2017 B2
9815056 Wu et al. Nov 2017 B2
9841653 Wu et al. Dec 2017 B2
9847356 Peng et al. Dec 2017 B2
9921451 Telfer et al. Mar 2018 B2
9966018 Gates et al. May 2018 B2
10018828 Massard Jul 2018 B2
10027329 Wu Jul 2018 B2
10037735 Amundson Jul 2018 B2
10048563 Paolini, Jr. et al. Aug 2018 B2
10048564 Paolini, Jr. et al. Aug 2018 B2
10190743 Hertel et al. Jan 2019 B2
10229641 Yang et al. Mar 2019 B2
10319313 Harris et al. Jun 2019 B2
20020060321 Kazlas et al. May 2002 A1
20020090980 Wilcox et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030102858 Jacobson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040085619 Wu et al. May 2004 A1
20040105036 Danner et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119681 Albert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040246562 Chung et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050122306 Wilcox et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122563 Honeyman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050253777 Zehner et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060255322 Wu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070052757 Jacobson Mar 2007 A1
20070091418 Danner et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070103427 Zhou et al. May 2007 A1
20070176912 Beames et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070285385 Albert et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080024429 Zehner Jan 2008 A1
20080024482 Gates et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080136774 Harris et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154179 Cantor et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080303780 Sprague et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090122389 Whitesides et al. May 2009 A1
20090174651 Jacobson et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090315044 Amundson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090322721 Zehner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100128341 Cheng May 2010 A1
20100177396 Lin Jul 2010 A1
20100194733 Lin et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100194789 Lin et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100220121 Zehner et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100225611 Lee et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100265561 Gates et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110063314 Chiu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110140744 Kazlas et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110175875 Lin Jul 2011 A1
20110187683 Wilcox et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110193840 Amundson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110193841 Amundson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110199671 Amundson et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110204375 Yagi Aug 2011 A1
20110221740 Yang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110292319 Cole Dec 2011 A1
20120001957 Liu et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120098740 Chiu et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120273702 Culbertson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120293858 Telfer et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130063333 Arango et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130146459 Bazant et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130161193 Jacobs et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130194250 Amundson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130249782 Wu et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140009817 Wilcox et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140078024 Paolini, Jr. et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140192000 Hung et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140204012 Wu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140210701 Wu et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140240210 Wu Aug 2014 A1
20140253425 Zalesky et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140293398 Wang et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150097877 Lin et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150261057 Harris et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150262255 Khajehnouri et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150262551 Zehner et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150378235 Lin et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160077375 Lin Mar 2016 A1
20160103380 Kayal et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160140910 Amundson May 2016 A1
20160178763 Okada Jun 2016 A1
20160178890 Massard Jun 2016 A1
20160180777 Lin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160312165 Lowe, Jr. et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170236474 Xu Aug 2017 A1
20180110975 Ivanhoff et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180271799 Liu et al. Sep 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
105665043 Jun 2016 CN
H06186575 Jul 1994 JP
2008145998 Jun 2008 JP
2013076729 Apr 2013 JP
2013076739 Apr 2013 JP
20070041934 Apr 2007 KR
200916823 Apr 2009 TW
1999067678 Dec 1999 WO
2000005704 Feb 2000 WO
2000036560 Jun 2000 WO
2000038000 Jun 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2019/051379, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 3, 2020.
Panchagnula, R. et al., “Transdermal delivery of naloxone: skin permeation, pharmacokinetic, irritancy and stability studies”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 293(1-2), pp. 213-223, Apr. 11, 2005.
Nisar, A. et al., “MEMS-based micropumps in drug delivery and biomedical applications”, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 130, Issue 2, pp. 917-942, Mar. 28, 2008.
Fouillet, Y. et al., “EWOD Digital Microfluidics for Lab on a Chip”, International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, Paper No. ICNMM2006-96020, pp. 1255-1264, (Sep. 2008).
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2019/056173, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 31, 2020.
Abdelgawad, Mohamed et al., “The Digital Revolution: A New Paradigm for Microfluidics”, Advanced Materials, vol. 21, pp. 920-925,(2009). Jan. 1, 2009.
Zhao, Ya-Pu et al., “Fundamentals and Applications of Electrowetting: A Critical Review”, Rev. Adhesion Adhesives, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 114-174 (2013) Feb. 1, 2013.
Kalsi, S. et al., “Rapid and sensitive detection of antibiotic resistance on a programmable digital microfluidic platform”, Lab on a Chip, Issue No. 14 (2015) Jun. 18, 2015.
Choi, Kihwan et al., “Digital Microfluidics”, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 5:413-40 (2012). Apr. 9, 2012.
Dong, Tao et al., “Capacitance Variation Induced by Microfluidic Two-Phase Flow across Insulated Interdigital Electrodes in Lab-On-Chip Devices”, Sensors, 15, pp. 2694-2708 (2015) Jan. 20, 2015.
Geronimo, G. De et al., “Front-end electronics for imaging detectors”, Nuclear Instrumentsand Methods in Physics Research A, 471 pp. 192-199, (2001). Jan. 1, 2001.
Korean International Patent Office, PCT/US2018/056037, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 3, 2019.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200089035 A1 Mar 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62732421 Sep 2018 US