The present invention provides an exhaust chamber system for internal combustion engines, which delivers improved horsepower, torque and/or fuel efficiency over standard and other performance mufflers.
Due to environmental concerns, governmental entities have steadily imposed stricter regulations on the amount and type of exhaust emitted by vehicles powered by the internal combustion engine. Moreover, the amount of noise produced by such engines must also meet stringent standards. The federal and state regulations may improve air quality and decrease noise pollution, however these mandates also produce severe drawbacks because the exhaust emission and sound control devices increase fuel consumption and decrease power production by the affected engines. The exhaust emission and sound control devices hamper engine performance as a result of back pressure of exhaust gas created by the very equipment that muffles the noise and cleans the exhaust gas. Designs of exhaust emission and sound control devices that increase exhaust flow-through will mitigate back pressure on the engine, thereby improving overall engine performance while still meeting demanding governmental environmental standards.
A number of systems have been proposed to provide a more efficient means of reducing noise and/or air pollution from internal combustion engine exhaust. Examples of such proposed systems are found in U.S. patents issued to Kojima (U.S. Pat. No. 4,533,015), Michikawa (U.S. Pat. No. 4,339,918), Taniguchi (U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,213), Harris et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,317,502), Taniguchi (U.S. Pat. No. 4,303,143), Kasper (U.S. Pat. No. 4,222,456), Everett (U.S. Pat. No. 4,129,196), Lyman (U.S. Pat. No. (4,109,753), Kashiwara et al (U.S. Pat. No. 4,050,539), and Iapella et al (U.S. Pat. No. 3,016,692), amongst others. However, none of these prior art references facilitate an improvement in engine power output or fuel efficiency. The quest to decrease noise and exhaust emissions, while off-setting the concomitant degradation of engine performance manifested by decreases in fuel efficiency, horsepower, and torque production, proves to be an ongoing struggle.
In particular the system proposed by Lyman (U.S. Pat. No. 4,109,753) presents a muffler assembly for substantially dampening acoustical vibrations of engine exhaust gases. The muffler assembly includes a flow control means, such as a diffuser having a centrally disposed baffle with radially extending deflector vanes and axially extending tabs. The diffuser is positioned near the inlet to an apertured louver tube within a loosely compact shell of sound attenuating material. The apertured louver tube has approximately the same cross sectional area as the inlet and outlet tubes. The diffuser has a planer baffle that substantially blocks and restricts the axial flow of exhaust gases along portions of the longitudinal axis of the louver tube, deflects the flow of exhaust gases toward the sound attenuating material and creates a turbulent flow. However, the Lyman muffler assembly fails to improve engine performance (i.e. fuel efficiency, horsepower, torque), and differs from the present invention in terms of blade (sharp versus rounded) and baffle geometry (planer versus cone shaped), expansion chamber cross sectional area (inlet area same as louver tube versus expansion chamber with larger cross section), and exhaust gas flows (turbulent versus contoured) as will be described.
The present invention provides an exhaust chamber system, comprising a stationary propeller type blade assembly with a nose cone within or adjacent to an expansion chamber, to contour turbulent exhaust gas and swirl the exhaust gas in a vortex fashion towards the outlet. The nose cone and blade assembly are set at varying angles to aid in arcuately shaping the gas flow. The expansion chamber has a larger cross sectional area than either the inlet or outlet, and is perforated with a maximum aperture count for optimized exhaust gas flow so that the swirling exhaust gas is in communication with the materials in the sound suppression sleeve. The spiral of the swirling exhaust gas becomes progressively tighter as the emissions travel through the expansion chamber to the outlet. This vortex generated by the stationary propeller type blade assembly with a nose cone acts to create a vacuum which draws more gases from the exhaust source, thereby reducing back pressure while increasing the exhaust through put of the engine. The exhaust chamber maintains the sound level of the exhaust within acceptable limits, while delivering improved horsepower, torque and/or fuel efficiency over that of standard and other performance mufflers.
It is the object of the present invention to provide a novel exhaust chamber system of the character recited for use with internal combustion engines.
Another object is to provide a novel exhaust chamber system that meets governmental regulations for sound emissions.
Another object is to provide a novel exhaust chamber system that improves fuel efficiency, engine horse power, and torque over internal combustion engines fitted with standard or other performance mufflers.
Another object is to provide a novel exhaust chamber system that contours exhaust gases into a vortex with the use of a stationary propeller type blade assembly with a nose cone.
Another object is to provide a novel exhaust chamber that produces a vacuum that relieves back pressure on the internal combustion engine and aids in scavenging exhaust gas from the system.
Another object is to provide a novel exhaust chamber system made up of a two piece construction.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent as this description proceeds, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The invention is described by the following examples. Variations based on the inventive features disclosed herein are within the skill of the ordinary artisan, and the scope of the invention should not be limited by the examples. To properly determine the scope of the invention, an interested party should consider the claims herein, and any equivalent thereof. In addition, all citations herein are incorporated by reference.
With reference to the accompanying drawings and particularly
An inlet tube 12 (either tapered 12a in
Sound suppression sleeve 16 is packed with known sound suppression materials. Examples of such materials include fiberglass, glass wool, ceramic, copper wool, copper strands, steel wool, etc. In the preferred embodiment the sound suppression material is high temperature ceramic packing that holds up to 1800 degrees Fahrenheit and is one inch thick. Expansion chamber tube 26 is perforated stainless steel with maximum aperture count for optimized exhaust gas flow (
In the preferred embodiment, at the opening to expansion chamber 24, at an end proximal to inlet tube 12, a stationary propeller type blade assembly 32 with a nose cone 36 and attached high temperature gasket seal 34 (see
In
Without being limited by any theory, it is believed that as turbulent exhaust gas enters the larger diameter of expansion chamber 24, the gases are contoured and spun by a special set of vanes of the stationary propeller type blade assembly 32 with nose cone 36. The result is a drop in pressure, which aids in scavenging the engine exhaust system. Engine exhaust gas flow velocity is kept high and unwanted backpressure is reduced. This facilitates the flow of the gasses through the expansion chamber and the outlet tube. The vortex effect creates a vacuum, which draws more gases from the exhaust source, increasing the exhaust throughput of the engine. It is found that the exemplary embodiments of the invention provide high performance propulsion exhaust chambers that increase horsepower, torque, and/or fuel efficiency for internal combustion engines, while maintaining the sound level of the engine within acceptable levels.
Relative to similar standard mufflers that do not have the stationary propeller type blade assembly 32 with a nose cone 36, it has been found that the horsepower of the engine can be increased from 13-19%, and fuel economy was increased by 10-14% in city driving, and from 14-18% in highway driving. Examples of vehicles that would benefit from the exhaust chamber system of the present invention include trucks, automobiles, riding lawn mowers, boats, snowmobiles, etc. Additionally, power machinery, or other equipment driven by internal combustion engines would also achieve performance improvements if equipped with the exhaust chamber system of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1816245 | Wolford | Jul 1931 | A |
2108671 | Kihachi | Feb 1938 | A |
2359365 | Morris | Oct 1944 | A |
2646854 | Walker | Jul 1953 | A |
2841235 | Curioni | Jul 1958 | A |
3182748 | Wirt | May 1965 | A |
4109753 | Lyman | Aug 1978 | A |
4303143 | Taniguchi | Dec 1981 | A |
4331213 | Taniguchi | May 1982 | A |
4339918 | Michikawa | Jul 1982 | A |
4574913 | Fukuda | Mar 1986 | A |
5962822 | May | Oct 1999 | A |
6082487 | Angelo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6158412 | Kim | Dec 2000 | A |
6745562 | Berriman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796296 | Kim | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20040046391 | Vasudeva | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050618 | Marocco | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050011697 | Arlasky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045418 | Choi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060076185 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |