Bactericidal (3,5-substituted polyoxymethylene oxazolidines

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4841064
  • Patent Number
    4,841,064
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 2, 1987
    37 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 20, 1989
    35 years ago
Abstract
This invention discloses a novel class of hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines, and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines to be used as bactericides in aqueous surface coating compositions.The compounds have the following structural formulas: ##STR1## wherein R is hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; R.sup.1 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms containing alkyl, halogen, alkoxy, nitro or other substitutuents; R.sup.2 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; and n represents an integer in the range of 0 to 8.
Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention discloses a novel class of hydroxy alkyl oxazolidines, and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines to be used as bactericides in aqueous surface coating compositions.
The compounds having the following structural formulas: ##STR2## wherein R is hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; R.sup.1 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms, a substituted aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms containing alkyl, halogen, alkoxy, nitro or other substituents; R.sup.2 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; and n represents an integer in the range of 0 to 8, preferably 0-4.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Aqueous surface coating compositions such as paints, enamels, varnishes and their respective component materials are particularly susceptible to contamination by bacteria and other microorganisms.
Various mono- and bi- cyclic oxymethyleneoxazolidines exhibit biocidal and disinfectant activity and are disclosed in various United States patents, including: 3,890,264; 3,962,271; 4,012,261; 4,022,906; 4,038,284; 4,088,655; 4,138,545; 4,148,905; 4,153,701. These known compounds are substituted at the 2 and in the 4 positions of the ring.
This invention provides a class of hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines which are characterized by novel structures including substitution at the 3 and in the 5 positions of the ring. The hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines and the resulting polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines are highly effective as antibacterial agents.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a class of hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines having structural formulas which include novel substituents at the 3 and 5 positions of the ring: ##STR3## wherein R is hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; R.sup.1 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms, a substituted aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms containing alkyl, halogen, alkoxy, nitro or other substituents; R.sup.2 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; and n represents an integer in the range of 0 to 8.
The substitutions permit the hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines to act as highly effective biocidal agents in aqueous surface coating compositions.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The biocidal compounds of this invention are prepared according to the following method:
Preparation of Oxazolidines
The oxazolidines of this invention are prepared by the reaction of an hydroxylated amine having the general formula: ##STR4## with an aldehyde having the general formula:
R.sup.1 --CH.dbd.O
The reaction is carried out in an inert solvent, which forms an azeotrope with water, at reflux. Equimolar portions of amine and aldehyde are preferred. The water of reaction is normally continuously removed. The solvent is removed and the product is distilled at reduced pressure.
The starting hydroxylated amines have the general formula: ##STR5## wherein R represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; and R.sup.2 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms. Preferably, R and R.sup.2 are hydrogen, or lower alkyls of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, particularly methly, ethyl, propyl or butyl. Specific useful hydroxylated amines are: diethanolamine, diisopropanolamine, diisobutanolamine, diisoamylalcoholamine, diisohexanolamine.
The starting aldehydes have the general formula:
R.sup.1 --CH.dbd.0
wherein R.sup.1 represents hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms containing alkyl, halogen, alkoxy, nitro or other substituents. Preferably, R.sup.1 is a lower alkyl. Specific useful aldehydes are formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, acetaldehyde, or propionaldehyde.
Preparation of Oxazolidine-Formaldehyde Adducts
The oxazolidines of this invention are prepared according to the above method. Then, one mole of the oxazolidine starting material is reacted with one to eight moles of aqueous formaldehyde and/or paraformaldehyde. The reaction is preferably carried out in an aqueous solution at 25.degree. to 100.degree. C.
The hydroxyalkyl oxazolidines and polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines prepared according to the above methods are advantageously used as biocidal agents in aqueous surface coating compositions. The concentration of the bactericide in the surface coating composition is in the range of 0.005% to 1.0%, preferably 0.05 to 0.35%.
The following Table lists various oxazolidines of this invention. The Table is not limiting in scope, and is intended for the purpose of illustration only.
______________________________________Compound n R R.sup.1 R.sup.2______________________________________1. (Example 2) 0 CH.sub.3 H CH.sub.32. (Example 3) 1 CH.sub.3 H CH.sub.33. (Example 4) 2 CH.sub.3 H CH.sub.34. (Example 5) 3 CH.sub.3 H CH.sub.35. (Example 6) 4 CH.sub.3 H CH.sub.36. 0 C.sub.2 H.sub.5 CH.sub.3 C.sub.2 H.sub.57. 0 C.sub.3 H.sub.7 CH.sub.3 C.sub.3 H.sub.78. 0 C.sub.4 H.sub.9 CH.sub.3 C.sub.4 H.sub.9______________________________________





EXAMPLES
The following examples are illustrative and are set forth for the purpose of illustration only and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any maner.
EXAMPLE 1
A mixture containing 46.6 g (0.35 m) of diisopropanolamine, 10.8 g (0.35 m) of 97% paraformaldehyde, and 100 cc of toluene was refluxed until 6.3 cc of water was collected in a Barrett tube. The toluene was distilled off and the remaining product was distilled at 78.degree. C. at a pressure of 4.5 mm Hg. The resulting yield of 3-(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methoxazolidine starting material was 96.6%.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 57.9 10.34 9.65 22.11Found 58.12 10.83 9.62 21.43______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
A mixture containing 29 g (0.2 m) of 3(2-hydroxy)-propyl-5-methyloxazolidine, 6.6 g (0.2 m) of 91% paraformaldehyde, and 34.4 g of water was refluxed for one hour. The product obtained was an aqueous solution containing 50% water and 50% 3-(2-hydroxymethylene oxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 27.43 10.41 4.00 58.15Found 27.21 10.45 3.96 58.38______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
A mixture containing 29 g (0.2 m) of 3-(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine, 13.2 g (0.4 m) of 91% paraformaldehyde and 39.8 g of water was stirred at reflux for 30 minutes. The product obtained was an aqueous solution containing 50% water and 50% 3-(2-[hydroxymethyloxymethyleneoxy])propyl-5-methyloxazolidine.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 26.34 10.18 3.42 60.05Found 26.16 10.21 3.39 60.24______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
A mixture containing 29 g (0.2 m) 3-(2 hydroxy-) propyl-5-methyloxazolidine, 18.5 g (0.6 m) of 97% paraformaldehyde and 46.5 g of water was stirred at reflux for one hour. The product obtained was an aqueous solution containing 50% water and 50% 3-[2-(hydroxymethyldioxymethyleneoxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 25.53 10.02 2.98 61.46Found 25.29 10.08 2.83 61.80______________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
A mixture containing 29 g (0.2 m) of 3-(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine, 33 g (1.0 m) of 91% paraformaldehyde and 56 g of water was stirred at reflux for one hour. The product obtained was an aqueous solution containing 50% water and 50% 3-[2-(hydroxymethyltetra(oxymethylene)oxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 24.41 9.79 2.37 63.42Found 24.49 9.72 2.34 63.45______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
A mixture containing 29 g (0.2m) of 3-(2-hydroxyl)-propyl-5-methyloxazolidine, 26.4g (0.8 m) of 91% paraformaldehyde and 50.6g of water stirred at reflux for 45 minutes. The product obtained was an aqueous solution containing 50% water and 50% 3-[2-(hydroxymethyltri(oxymethylene)oxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
Elemental analysis of the product showed the following:
______________________________________ % C % H % N % O______________________________________Calculated 24.90 9.89 2.64 62.56Found 24.94 9.86 2.61 62.59______________________________________
EXAMPLE 7
The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Test against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa was carried out under the following conditions. The compounds of this invention were added to sterile nutrient broth at 0.1% (1000 ppm) concentration. Each mixture was sequentially diluted with sterile broth to yield various levels of concentrations (500 ppm, 250 ppm, 125 ppm, 62 ppm).
One drop of an actively-growing 24-hour culture of the bacteria was added to each level and the mixture was incubated at 30.degree. C. After 24 hours of incubation, an aliquot from each tube was placed on nutrient agar and observed for growth. The results appear in Table I.
Table I also indicates the results of a test run to show the concentration of test compound required to kill Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in 24 hours.
TABLE I______________________________________Biological Data on Oxazolidine Derivatives______________________________________ LEVEL PPM 1000 500 250 125 62______________________________________Minimum Inhibitory Concentration against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa1:1 Molar Ratio* - - - + +1:2 Molar Ratio - - - + +1:3 Molar Ratio - - - + +1:4 Molar Ratio - - - - +1:5 Molar Ratio - - - - +Oxazolidine** - - - + +Concentration Required to Kill Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in 24 Hrs.1:1 Molar Ratio* - - + + +1:2 Molar Ratio - - + + +1:3 Molar Ratio - - - + +1:4 Molar Ratio - - - + +1:5 Molar Ratio - - + + +Oxazolidine** - - - + +______________________________________ LEGEND: - = No Growth + = Growth *In each instance the molar ratio is for the compound to paraformaldehyd **3(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine
EXAMPLE 8
The anti-bacterial properties of paints containing the compounds of this invention were subsequently evaluated. A latex paint was prepared by following the order of addition listed in the paint formulations in Table II.
TABLE II______________________________________PAINT FORMULATIONRAW MATERIAL LBS. PEP 100 GALLONS______________________________________Water 200Ethylene Glycol 20Cellulosic Thickener 3Dispersant 6Surfactant 2Defoamer 1Bactericide 2.3Titanium Dioxide 250Magnesium Silicate 150Water 20Coalescing Agent 8Defoamer 1Vinyl Acrylic Emulsion 468 1131.30______________________________________
The bactericide was incorporated before the pigment (titanium dioxide, magnesium silicate) as part of the grind. After 20 minutes, the remaining paint ingredients were added at a slow speed. The paint prepared in this manner contained a 0.2% concentration of oxazolidine or derivatives, as a 50% aqueous solution.
The paints containing the oxazolidines were inoculated with a mixed bacterial culture containing Escherichia Coli, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Proteus Mirabilis, and Enterobacter Aerogenes. Biocidal performance was evaluated at various time intervals by applying a streak of each paint to nutrient agar and recording the results on a growth/no growth basis. The results are listed on Table III.
TABLE III______________________________________Anti-Bacterial Evaluation of Oxazolidine Derivatives at 0.2%Versus A Mixed Bacterial Culture of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa,Escherichia Coli, Proteus Mirabilis, Enterobacter Aerogenes______________________________________ 4 24 48 72 7 HRS HRS HRS HRS DAYS______________________________________ FIRST INOCULATIONBlank 4 4 4 4 41:1 Molar Ratio* 2 0 0 0 01:2 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 01:3 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 01:4 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 01:5 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 0Oxazolidine** 0 0 0 0 0 SECOND INOCULATIONBlank 3 4 4 4 41:1 Molar Ratio* 3 0 0 0 01:2 Molar Ratio 2 0 0 0 01:3 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 01:4 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 01:5 Molar Ratio 0 0 0 0 0Oxazolidine** 4 4 4 4 4______________________________________ LEGEND: 0 = no microbial growth 1 = slight microbial growth 2 = moderate microbial growth 3 = heavy microbial growth 4 = very heavy microbial growth *In each instance the molar ratio is for the compound to paraformaldehyd **3(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine
EXAMPLE 9
The physical characteristics of the paint containing the oxazolidines were recorded. A 3 mil wet film drawdown using a Bird Applicator comparing the blank paint (no bactericide) versus the paint containing the biocide was made, and a visual determination of color differences was observed. The results are shown in Table IV.
TABLE IV______________________________________PAINT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OXAZOLIDINEDERIVATIVES AT A LEVEL OF 0.2% BIOCIDEON TOTAL PAINT WEIGHT VISCOS- ITY(KU) pH FILM APPEARANCE______________________________________Blank 78 7.5 OK1:1 Molar Ratio* 75 7.5 Slight Yellow1:2 Molar Ratio 78 7.6 Slight Yellow1:3 Molar Ratio 78 7.6 OK1:4 Molar Ratio 78 7.6 OK1:5 Molar Ratio 78 7.5 OKOxazolidine** 76 7.5 Slight Yellow______________________________________ *In each instance the ratio is for the compound to paraformaldehyde **3(2-hydroxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine
Claims
  • 1. A class of polyoxymethyleneoxazolidines having the structural formula: ##STR6## wherein R is an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; R.sup.1 represents a hydrogen, an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms, a substituted aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms containing alkyl, halogen, alkoxy, or nitro substituents, R.sup.2 represents an alkyl group of 1 to 6 carbon atoms, a cycloalkyl group of 3 to 8 carbon atoms, or an aryl group of 6 to 10 carbon atoms; and n represents an integer in the range of 1 to 8.
  • 2. A polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 wherein R and R.sub.2 represent lower alkyl, and R.sup.1 represents hydrogen or lower alkyl.
  • 3. The polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 comprising 3-(2-hydroxymethyleneoxy)propyl-5-methyloxazolidine.
  • 4. The polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 comprising 3-[2-(hydroxymethyloxymethyleneoxy)propyl]-5-methyoxazolidine.
  • 5. The polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 comprising 3-[2-(hydroxymethyl-di(oxymethylene)oxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
  • 6. The polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 comprising 3-[2-(hydroxymethyl-tri(oxymethylene)oxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
  • 7. The polyoxymethyleneoxazolidine according to claim 1 comprising 3-[2-(hydroxymethyl-tetra(oxymethylene)oxy)propyl]-5-methyloxazolidine.
Parent Case Info

This is continuation of application Ser. No. 942,041 filed Dec. 16, 1986 which in turn is a continuation of application Ser. No. 676,901 filed Nov. 30, 1984, now abandoned which in turn is a divisional of application Ser. No. 304,809 filed Sept. 23, 1981, now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
2571985 Carnes et al. Oct 1951
2800487 Mark Jul 1957
2817663 Conlon et al. Dec 1957
3962271 Sidi et al. Jun 1976
4012261 Sidi et al. Mar 1977
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Mildew Resistance, Fed. Test Method STD No. 141a (1965).
Kotone et al., Chem. Abst. 78-137057d (1973).
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 304809 Sep 1981
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 942041 Dec 1986
Parent 676901 Nov 1984
Parent 418256 Sep 1982