Bactericidal composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4868217
  • Patent Number
    4,868,217
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 1, 1987
    37 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 19, 1989
    34 years ago
Abstract
A bactericidal composition comprises didecyldimethyl didecyldimethylammonium chloride and an alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol being trivalent or more and is effective bactericidally even to feces of a cattle stall.
Description

This invention relates to a bactericidal composition. More particularly, it relates to a bactericidal composition which exhibits a high bactericidal effect even in the presence of organic materials such as feces in a cattle stall.
It has been widely known that didecyldimethylammonium chloride exhibits higher bactericidal effects on various bacteria including pathogenic ones than other bactericidal compounds such as alkylbenzyldimethylammonium chloride.
However didecyldimethylammonium chloride has a disadvantage that its bactericidal effect is significantly lowered because of a large amount of feces adhering thereto when used in stalls of cattle, for example, cows or horses, or poultry.
Under these circumstances, we have tried to solve the above problem and to enhance the bactericidal effect of didecyldimethylammonium chloride in the presence of organic materials originating from feces. As a result, we have found that didecyldimethylammonium chloride can exhibit an excellent bactericidal effect, even in the presence of organic materials, when it is used together with a particular compound, thus completing the present invention.
The invention provides a bactericidal composition which comprises didecyldimethylammonium chloride and an alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol having three or more hydroxyl groups.
The polyhydric alcohol preferably includes pentaerythritol, trimethylolpropane, di-trimethylolpropane, polymethylolnonane, neopentylglycol, di-pentaerythritol, glycerine and polyglycerine. It is preferred that the adduct has a mole number of added alkylene oxide ranging between 4 and 200, more preferably 4 and 100, per one mole of the polyhydric alcohol.
The adduct includes an embodiment having the formula (I): ##STR1## in which R is an alkylene having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a, b, c and d each are zero or an integer of 1 to 50 and the total number of a, b, c and d ranges from 4 to 200.
The alkylene oxide adduct preferably contains 20 to 100 mole percent of ethylene oxide based on the total alkylene oxide.
The adduct to use in the invention is obtained by the addition reaction between a polyhydric alcohol having three or more hydroxyl groups and an alkylene oxide in the presence of an acid catalyst or an alkali catalyst. The alkylene oxide preferably includes ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, butylene oxide and a mixture thereof. The addition reaction may be conducted so as to obtain a block adduct.
It is preferable that a weight ratio of the didecyldimethylammonium chloride to said adduct ranges from 1/0.1 to 1/10, more preferably from 1/0.2 to 1/7.
The bactericidal composition of the present invention may be usually prepared in the form of an aqueous solution of 2 to 50% by weight in concentration and diluted prior to use to give a concentration of 100 to 1000 ppm, although it may vary depending on the subject.
In the embodiment of the present invention, various surfactants or other additives may be added to the diluted composition of the present invention to thereby improve the physical properties thereof, for example, to lower the surface tension, to impart the wet malleability or to control foaming. Examples of these additives are nonionic surfactants such as polyoxyethylene (POE) (9) nonylphenyl ether and POE (12) octylphenyl ether; and anionic surfactants such as sodium POE (5) octylphenyl ether sulfate and magnesium POE (6) dodecylphenyl ether sulfate.
The bactericidal composition of the invention provides an excellent bactericidal effect even in the presence of organic materials such as feces. This effect is synergistic due to the two components.





To further illustrate the present invention, and not by way of limitation, the following Examples will be given.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
Escherichia coli, which had been previously cultured in a slant medium, wassuspended in didecyldimethylammonium chloride diluted to the concentrationsas shown in Table 1 for 1, 2.5 and 5 minutes. Then the cells were collected, transplanted to an agar medium and allowed to stand therein for24 hours, followed by observation of the growth condition thereof.
The abovementioned procedure was followed except that 1% by weight of fowl droppings were added to each didecyldimethylammonium chloride solution.
The growth of the E. coli was evaluated according to the following criterion:
-: no colony is formed,
.+-.: 1 to 5 colonies are formed,
+: 6 to 10 colonies are formed, and
++: 11 or more colonies are formed.
Table 1 shows the result.
TABLE 1______________________________________ No fowl 1.0% of fowldroppings added droppings addedConc. of didecyl- contact period contact perioddimethylammonium (min) (min)chloride (ppm) 1 2.5 5 1 2.5 5______________________________________12.5 ppm .+-. - - ++ ++ ++25.0 - - - ++ ++ ++50.0 - - - ++ ++ ++100.0 - - - ++ + +200.0 - - - + + .+-.400.0 - - - + .+-. -______________________________________
These results suggest that the bactericidal effect of didecyldimethylammonium chloride is lowered under practical conditions, i.e., in the presence of fowl droppings.
EXAMPLE 1
The compositions listed in Table 2 were each prepared, using didecyldimethylammonium chloride, an alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydricalcohol and water. The alkylene oxide adduct was an adduct of 8 moles of ethylene oxide to pentaerythritol, called POE(8)pentaerythritol, or an adduct of 8 moles of ethylene oxide and 20 moles of propylene oxide to pentaerythritol, called POE(8)POP(20)pentaerythritol. These compositions were examined as to their effect against the growth of E. coli in the sameway as shown in Comparative Example 1. Results are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 2______________________________________ Content of didecyl-Formu- dimethyl ammonium Adduct Waterlation chloride (wt. %) Name (wt. %) (wt. %)______________________________________1 10 POE(8) 1 892 10 pentaery- 10 80 thritol3 10 50 404 10 70 205 10 POE(8)/ 1 896 10 POP(20) 10 807 10 pentaery- 50 40 thritol8 10 70 20______________________________________
TABLE 3______________________________________Dilution ratio(concn. of didecyl- 1% fowl droppings addeddimethylammonium contact period (min)chloride) Formulation 1 2.5 5______________________________________.times. 1000 1 + .+-. .+-.(100 ppm) 2 .+-. - - 3 - - - 4 - - - 5 + + .+-. 6 .+-. - - 7 - - - 8 - - -.times. 500 1 .+-. .+-. -(200 ppm) 2 - - - 3 - - - 4 - - - 5 .+-. .+-. - 6 - - - 7 - - - 8 - - -.times. 250 1 .+-. - -(400 ppm) 2 - - - 3 - - - 4 - - - 5 .+-. - - 6 - - - 7 - - - 8 - - -______________________________________
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
The procedure of Example 1 was followed except that the preparations were formulated, as shown below, by using POE(8) lauryl ether and POE(7) nonylphenylether for the adduct.
______________________________________Comparative Formulation 1:______________________________________didecyldimethylammonium chloride 10% by weightPOE (8) lauryl ether 50water 40______________________________________
______________________________________Comparative Formulation 2______________________________________didecyldimethylammonium chloride 10% by weightPOE (7) nonylphenyl ether 50water 40______________________________________
Table 4 shows the results.
TABLE 4______________________________________Dilution ratio(concn. of didecyl- 1% fowl droppings addeddimethylammonium contact period (min)chloride) Formulation 1 2.5 5______________________________________.times. 1000 Comp. Form. 1 ++ + +(100 ppm) 2 ++ + +.times. 500 1 + + .+-.(200 ppm) 2 + + .+-..times. 250 1 + .+-. -(400 ppm) 2 + .+-. -______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
The preparations 9 to 13 were each formulated by using 10 wt.% of didecyldimethylammonium chloride, 50 wt.% of an alkylene oxide adduct listed below and 40 wt.% of water and examined about the effect against the growth of E. coli in the same way as shown in Comparative Example 1. Results are shown in Table 5.
______________________________________preparation 9 POE (10) trimethylolpropane10 POE (15) ditrimethylolpropane11 POE (8) POP (6) glycerine12 POE (12) dipentaerythritol13 POE (12) diglycerine______________________________________
TABLE 5______________________________________Dilution ratio(concn. of didecyl- 1% fowl droppings addeddimethylammonium contact period (min)chloride) Formulation 1 2.5 5______________________________________.times. 1000 9 - - -(100 ppm) 10 - - - 11 .+-. - - 12 - - - 13 .+-. - -.times. 500 9 - - -(200 ppm) 10 - - - 11 - - - 12 - - - 13 - - -.times. 250 9 - - -(400 ppm) 10 - - - 11 - - - 12 - - - 13 - - -______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A bacterial composition which comprises didecyldimethylammonium chloride and a C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol having three or more hydroxyl groups, said adduct having a mole number of C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide ranging between 4 to 200 per mole polyhydric alcohol and a weight ratio of didecyldimethylammonium chloride to C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide adduct of from 1/0.1 to 1/10.
  • 2. A composition as claimed in claim 1, in which said polyhydric alcohol is selected from pentaerythritol, trimethylolpropane, di-trimethylolpropane, polymethylolnonane, neopentylglycol, di-pentaerythritol, glycerine and polyglycerine.
  • 3. A composition as claimed in claim 1, in which the adduct contains 20 to 100 mole percent of ethylene oxide based on total C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide.
  • 4. A composition as claimed in claim 1, which further comprises a nonionic surfactant.
  • 5. An aqueous solution which comprises 2 to 50 percent by weight of said composition as defined in claim 1 and the balance of water.
  • 6. A bacterial composition which comprises didecyldimethylammonium chloride and an alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol having the following formula (I): ##STR2## in which R is an alkylene having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a, b, c and d each are zero or an interger of 1 to 50 and a+b+c+d ranges from 4 to 200, said didecyldimethylammonium chloride having a weight ratio to said alkylene oxide adduct of from 1/0.1 to 1/10.
  • 7. A composition as claimed in claim 6, in which the adduct contains 20 to 100 mole percent of ethylene oxide based on total alkylene oxide.
  • 8. A composition as claimed in claim 6, which further comprises a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of polyoxyethylene (9) nonylphenyl ether and polyoxyethylene (12) octylphenyl ether.
  • 9. An aqueous solution consisting essentially of 2 to 50 percent by weight of a bacterial composition and the balance of water, said bacterial composition comprising didecyldimethylammonium chloride and a C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide adduct of a polyhydric alcohol having three or more hydroxyl groups, said adduct having a mole number of C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide ranging between 4 to 200 per mole polyhydric alcohol and a weight ratio of didecyldimethylammonium chloride to C.sub.2-4 -alkylene oxide adduct of from 1/0.1 to 1/10.
  • 10. An aqueous solution as claimed in claim 9, in which said bacterial composition also contains a nonionic surfactant.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
61-75978 Apr 1986 JPX
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
4476107 Schmolka Oct 1984
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1554615 Oct 1979 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Polyethers (PtI Polyalkylene Oxides & Other Polyethers) Gaylord ed. Interscience Publishers .COPYRGT. 1963.