The present invention relates to vibratory devices such as vibrating screens for classifying aggregate and vibratory feeders for feeding aggregate to crushing and processing devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to an improved wheel case for housing the rotating components of the vibratory devices and for protecting those components from the loss of lubricant and/or from the ingress of contaminants.
Vibrating screen devices and vibrating feeder devices are generally well known in the art. On a typical vibrating screening device, a system of classifying screens are mounted to a frame which in turn is supported on a system of springs. At or near the center of the device is an eccentrically weighted shaft unit, typically having one, two, or three or more rotating and eccentrically weighted shafts. On a multi-shaft unit, the shafts may be counter-rotating such that the eccentric weights are oriented in the same direction twice each revolution. This causes the screen to vibrate, which aids the classifying effects of the screen device. On a vibrating feeder, a similar shaft unit vibrates the feed trough or chute, which “throws” the aggregate contained in the trough in a desired direction. An example of such a device can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,469 issued to Archer.
The ends of the rotating shafts are supported by bearings, and each shaft includes a drive wheel or gear. The shaft drive gears are operatively coupled to an external drive motor. The eccentric weights are typically attached to the ends of the shafts adjacent the drive wheels. The bearings and the drive wheels require constant lubrication, and thus such components are disposed within a wheel housing or case containing a quantity of oil or other suitable lubricating fluid. The wheel case is typically bolted to the frame of the vibratory device.
Historically, conventional cap screws have been used to secure the wheel case to the frame of the vibratory device. However, due to the constant vibration, coupled with the constant exposure of the cap screws to the lubricating oil, such conventional cap screws are subject to loosening. The loosened cap screws provide a convenient avenue for oil loss, and also provide a convenient avenue for the ingress of dirt, water, and other contaminants. Moreover, the cap screws are not readily accessible for the purposes of re-tightening.
Accordingly, threadless fasteners have been used, such as the threadless fastener sold under the trade name Huckbolt® manufactured by the Federal Mogul Corporation. Such a fastener has a threadless collar that is pressed onto the bolt shank using hydraulic means. The collar engages a series of annular rings spaced along the bolt shank. Such bolts typically provide consistent clamping force and exhibit high resistance to loosening in most applications. However, such bolts may experience loosening when used in highly lubricated, vibrating environments, thus leading to the leakage problems outlined above. Such bolts are not easily re-tightened, and as outlined above, it is not easy to access the securing bolts in any event.
In addition to the problems with oil loss and contaminant ingress, both of which lead to premature failure of the gears and/or the bearings housed within the wheel case, a loose bolt also causes the holes through the bolted components to enlarge, thus accelerating the loss of oil or the ingress of contaminants. Moreover, loose bolts permit small pieces of aggregate to become lodged between the various bolted components, rendering it impossible to securely bolt the components together without completely disassembling and cleaning the device.
A similar leakage problem may be created where the spindles, which support the rotatable shafts, are secured to the frame. The spindles are typically disposed within the wheel case such that the shaft bearings are exposed to a constant supply of lubricating oil. Each spindle includes a mounting flange, and an O-ring seal may be provided under the mounting flange. However, the cap screws used to secure the spindle to the frame may loosen in a manner similar to the problem described above, leading to similar problems.
As mentioned above, at least one of the shafts is operatively coupled to an external drive system. Typically, one of the shafts is extended through the wheel case cover for connection to a drive motor. This penetration through the wheel case must be sealed. Due to deflections at the end of the shaft caused by the extreme operating conditions, the end of the shaft typically experiences “runout” which typically causes premature breakdown of the seal. Although labyrinth seals have been employed, a typical labyrinth seal includes a weep hole for captured oil to escape back into the sealed area. Under the extreme operating conditions of the wheel case, in which the rotating eccentric weights contact the oil supply at velocities in excess of 5000 feet per second, the resulting oil agitation throws oil through the weep hole, causing lubricant loss. Consequently, the seal becomes one additional path of lubricant loss or contaminant ingress.
Accordingly, an improved wheel case having an improved fastening system less prone to loosening and leakage is desired. It is also desired to have an improved wheel case which exhibits better lubricant retention characteristics than prior art wheel cases.
The embodiment described herein is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the scope of the invention to the precise form disclosed. The following embodiment has been chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to follow its teachings.
Referring now to the drawings, an improved wheel case generally indicated by the reference numeral 10 is shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Although a number of configurations are contemplated for the attachment bolt 46, the preferred embodiment is shown in FIG. 3. Referring now to
The bolt 46 is preferably a threadless bolt having a pressed on collar 58, and preferably the bolt 46 is a threadless bolt sold under the trade name Huckbolt® and is manufactured by the Federal Mogul Corporation. Other suitable fasteners, especially other suitable threadless fasteners and/or other suitable fasteners which may be fastened with a desired pre-load tension on the bolt 46 may be employed, with the desired pre-load tension typically being designated by the manufacturer or otherwise determined using well known principles of mechanics. The collar 58 is preferably pressed on using a tool, such as a hydraulic tool, of the type commonly employed for such installations. The collar 58 is retained on the shank 52 by a plurality of annular rings 60 spaced along a portion of the shank 52.
A pair of compression control washers 62, 64 are provided. The washers 62, 64 are preferably 0.108 inches thick, and have a hardness in the range of 38-45 on the Rockwell “C” hardness scale. The washer 62 includes an aperture 66 which is greater than the diameter of the shank 52 so as to define an annular cavity 68 surrounding the shank 52. The annular cavity 68 is sized to receive a resilient O-ring seal 70. Similarly, the washer 64 includes an aperture 72 which is greater than the diameter of the shank 52 so as to define an annular cavity 74 surrounding the shank 52. The annular cavity 74 is sized to receive a resilient O-ring seal 76. The O-rings 70, 76 are preferably thicker than the thickness of the washers 62, 64, and are preferably 0.140 inches thick. Still preferably, the O-rings may be manufactured of a resilient rubber compound, such as nitrile rubber.
The washer 62 and the O-ring 70 are disposed adjacent the outer contact surface 56, while the washer 64 and the O-ring 76 are disposed adjacent the inside contact surface 54, inside the wheel case 10. An additional washer 78 may be employed, but the use of such is optional.
In operation, the housing 38 and the stiffeners 34 are positioned for attachment to the sidewall 18 of the frame 14 as shown in FIG. 3. The washer 62 and the O-ring 70 are positioned on the bolt 46 adjacent the outer contact surface 56. The inner end 48 of the attachment bolt 46 is then inserted into the wheel case 10 from the opposite side of the sidewall 18. The washer 64 and the O-ring 76 are placed along the shank 52, and then the collar 58 is applied using the above-referenced tool in a known manner. The tool draws the inner end 48 (typically by pulling on a break-away portion, which is not shown but which is releasable along a frangible connection line 80). As stated above, the optional washer 78 may be included as shown.
In the process of securing the bolt 46, the inner and outer contact surfaces 54, 56 are drawn together, which compresses the O-rings 70, 76 such that they substantially fill their respective annular cavities 68, 74. The ratio between the thickness of the O-rings 70, 76 and the thickness of their associated washer 62, 64, allows for the O-rings to be compressed a desired amount to maximize their sealing capacities while preventing inadvertent damage to the O-rings via over-compression.
The embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
The embodiment shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
It will be appreciated that, during operation of the device 12, splashing and otherwise agitated oil (not shown) is shielded from the seal 104, the weep hole 106 and the aperture 102 by the annular baffle 108. The sealing properties are enhanced by the relatively small size of the gap 112.
Numerous modifications and alternative embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for the purpose of teaching those skilled in the art the best mode of carrying out the invention. The details of the structure may be varied substantially without departing from the spirit of the invention, and the exclusive use of all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims is reserved.
This is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/273,432, filed Mar. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,708.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003163 | Warren | May 1935 | A |
2396005 | Gross et al. | Mar 1946 | A |
2643904 | Wehmanen | Jun 1953 | A |
2742790 | Nelson | Apr 1956 | A |
2884790 | Lehman | May 1959 | A |
2927495 | Barwood | Mar 1960 | A |
3066568 | Armour | Dec 1962 | A |
3170701 | Hoover | Feb 1965 | A |
3276289 | Cox | Oct 1966 | A |
3422721 | Yonkers | Jan 1969 | A |
3519279 | Wagner | Jul 1970 | A |
3592480 | Koranyi | Jul 1971 | A |
3606357 | Yonkers | Sep 1971 | A |
3622167 | Velthoven | Nov 1971 | A |
3627334 | Reddy | Dec 1971 | A |
3661046 | Waud et al. | May 1972 | A |
3796437 | Nickly | Mar 1974 | A |
3910588 | Austin | Oct 1975 | A |
4077873 | McKibben | Mar 1978 | A |
4170549 | Johnson | Oct 1979 | A |
4177999 | Raber | Dec 1979 | A |
4340469 | Archer | Jul 1982 | A |
4347759 | Renk et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4470324 | Renk et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4519736 | Sigmund | May 1985 | A |
4566351 | Skipor | Jan 1986 | A |
4632751 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4655463 | Inciong et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4806810 | Hernden | Feb 1989 | A |
4924533 | Stairs, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
4928551 | Connelly et al. | May 1990 | A |
5035155 | Robledo | Jul 1991 | A |
5035266 | Benson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5220846 | Niklewski | Jun 1993 | A |
5231886 | Quirk et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5562379 | Rausch et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5676221 | Renk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687480 | Khariton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5924813 | Sasaki | Jul 1999 | A |
5957641 | Bogatz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6138980 | Farbotnik | Oct 2000 | A |
6173969 | Stoll et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6386375 | Olsen | May 2002 | B1 |
6543788 | Ito | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580189 | Mooney | Jun 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020053534 A1 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09273432 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 10020647 | US |