This invention relates to packaging and is particularly, but not exclusively, concerned with packaging liquids—or other flowable materials, such as powders or granules—in so called bag-in-box (BIB) containers.
In the BIB approach, a flexible-walled bag is used as an (internal) liner—and housed within a protective outer box carton, typically of semi-rigid cardboard.
The term ‘carton’ is used herein for convenience to embrace, not merely traditional cardboard—but, as regards the scope of the present invention, other materials, such as corrugated, solid or laminated plastics or composites.
For esoteric applications, stranded or fibre-reinforcement could also be contemplated.
BIB Alternatives—Jerrycans
A prime BIB target for substitution is a so-called jerrycan (or jerrican), being a (blow) moulded semi-rigid walled container, with an integrated neck spout (typically threaded) and complementary closure cap.
Mould tool set up costs are prohibitive for implementing low volume changes—precluding bespoke customer configurations or formats.
Some aspects of the present invention seek to contrive a direct competitive substitute for jerrycans, with further advantages.
BIB—Box Carton
A box carton is fabricated—typically die cut—from a flat carton blank sheet {—and is collapse foldable}.
Carton erection from a flat sheet 2-D form to an erect 3-D form creates a hollow shell for bag liner housing.
Generally, the shell housing completely envelopes shrouds or wraps the vulnerable bag liner and its flowable contents—so protecting it from casual impact, puncture and contents spillage.
Thus a bag liner is commonly wrapped up and sealed in a box carton.
However, issues of access to the bag and contents arise post box carton enclosure.
BIB—Bag
A bag liner is typically of plastics thin film—extruded as tubing, collapsed into a flat web.
This web can be rolled up, as a continuous length—or segmented into individual flat bags, which can be stacked.
Film thickness and material reflects a balance between robustness and cost.
Single or multiple layer or ply bag constructions may be employed.
Localised (corner edge) seam welds can help brace or define a (regular) erect form.
Having the bag fill to a predetermined (outer) contour or form, consistent with that of the intended outer carton shroud, makes for easier installation of the bag within the carton—such as by insertion from one end of a partially erected carton configuration.
Alternatively, a generic (free-form) so-called ‘pillow bag’ may be used to minimise overall manufacturing costs.
Bag Port
Basic bag liners commonly feature a reinforced fill and discharge port, forming or configured for location of, a contents access neck or spout.
Such bag liners may be sealed upon fill—and so require seal puncture, by say local discharge spout penetration, to allow controlled contents discharge.
Some bag variants integrate the bag wall with a semi-rigid neck upstand—for removable closure fitment.
This allows a pre-formed neck thread, with a complementary threaded screw closure cap.
Bag Format
Filled bag profiles may leave wasteful voids between (curvilinear)bag and (rectilinear)container.
Certain bag constructions have been contrived to adopt a more rectangular filled form, complementary to that of the carton outer, through judicious disposition of joining, stiffening or profiling seams.
An example is the proprietary CPAC QUAD™ bag of single skin, with four upright side corner edges and an ‘H’ pattern base weld to achieve a cuboid form upon contents fill.
A particular QUAD CLASSIC™ bag variant adopts a double-walled construction, in which a cylindrical inner bag is secured locally to an outer bag intermediate its corners.
The outer bag is a ‘standard’ balloon or pillow bag made from a single sheet—folded and edge seam welded to form a ‘cuboid’ bag form upon contents fill.
Internally, a cylinder of sheet material is attached in ‘upright’ strips along inner side walls of the outer bag.
As the internal cylinder is not secured at the corners of the external bag—upon fill, (liquid) contents flows into voids between internal and external walls.
These in turn form corner ‘posts’ or pillars—bringing the overall bag into a more defined ‘cube’ form, and contributing structural strength, stiffness and rigidity.
Bag Access
With a basic BIB format, bag fill is generally undertaken on dedicated fill line—remotely of, or at least as a discrete step from, cartoning.
Bags can be grasped at a fill neck or collar upstand, by a location flange or rim—and supported, or rather suspended therefrom, for contents fill.
Bag construction can be stressed to allow this—a factor used to advantage in the present invention for bag support within a box carton.
A closure/seal is fitted upon fill— and the filled bag dropped, as a free-form bulging sack, upon a feed conveyor— and thence to a cartoning station.
Filled bags are introduced into a part pre-assembled carton (in tubular form)—typically through open flaps at one (upper) end.
Once a bag is inserted into an outer box carton—the carton (opposite end flaps) is closed around.
Thus bag (port) contents access requires opening (one end of) the carton.
In a BIB refinement, a bag neck stem is fed through—and so located by—a complementary aperture cut-out in one end flap.
This preserves exposure of a protruding neck upstand and attendant closure beyond the box carton, for ease of contents access.
However, this arrangement is unsuitable for post-assembly fill, as with, say, a jerrycan—in what is commonly an environment wet with contents spillage.
Thus a box carton is not usually moisture-proof, but can absorb and be degraded by wetting.
Nor is a coupled bag sufficiently braced to take engagement and trigger loads from a downward fill dispenser head.
A protruding bag neck is vulnerable in handling and dropping.
The neck also interrupts the otherwise rectangular box carton outer form, so impeding compact packing and stacking.
Bag Contents Fill
Bag contents fill is a prime consideration for a contents manufacturer.
Generally, dedicated automated filling lines are employed for a bespoke BIB configuration.
Traditional bag fill typically prefaces insertion of a filled bag into a pre-formed carton assembly.
Insertion and cartoning themselves can be a mix of manual and mechanised steps.
Fill Machinery
Resources commitment inhibits a packaging change, if incompatible with established filling machinery.
Hitherto, fill machinery for moulded jerrycans has often been incompatible with that for BIB containers.
Again, a wet fill environment is a factor.
Thus substitution of BIB alternatives to jerrycans has been impeded, not only by the need to replicate jerrycan features (discussed later), but by the need for new fill machinery—a prohibitive investment.
Collapse Fold
A collapse-folded, pre-filled condition is advantageous for compact storage and transport.
In particular, voids between containers are minimised, if not eliminated, as compared with, say, semi-rigid hollow containers (jerrycans).
On the other hand, bag filling, carton erection and bag-into-carton insertion machinery is required.
Post Fill—Collapse Upon Empty Mode
For certain applications, a facility to collapse-fold, say into a compact flat-pack, after use—that is fill and contents discharge—would be advantageous.
Thus, say, a collapsible, refillable water carrier—which would flat collapse fold for transport and storage between contents fill would be very convenient.
Such a collapsible carrier would find a use in camping, military and charitable aid contexts.
Moreover, collapse for waste disposal or recycling and bag from carton separation, would be useful—not least to meet legislative requirements.
This is a facility which largely escapes jerrycans—albeit certain (wall) materials allow (empty mode) resilient can deformation and even crushing.
Rather, in large-scale industrial applications, jerrycans are commonly shipped back empty after use to a supplier or waste disposal station.
According to one aspect of the invention, a Bag In Box (BIB) container [package] (10)—for flowable materials, including liquid, solid powders or particles—with an inner (contents) bag liner (12) locatable within an outer box carton (11), has a neck piece (14), between a bag neck (13) and carton aperture (24).
According to another aspect of the invention, a BIB container package, —for liquid or flowable material—comprises a bag inner liner and a box carton outer (shell); with a bag (neck) location and support element, (such as a neck piece), configured as any one, or a combination of:
This element partially enshrouds and protects the bag neck and an attendant closure (cap).
Free access to the neck and its removable closure is preserved, for contents fill and discharge.
Box structural performance (stiffness and rigidity) is unimpeded—and can even be enhanced by judicious top ledge and neck piece configuration.
The recess preserves a ‘uniform’—say rectangular—box carton outer form or profile, in turn allowing compact packing and stacking.
The recess is conveniently at an upper side edge of the carton, to facilitate contents access—in particular contents discharge, by pouring from a tilted or upturned container.
An optional supporting spill ledge or splash back guard can be integrated with the neck piece to protect the box carton locally.
Handles, such as handle cut-outs or apertures, say with pre-formed handle inserts, can be incorporated in the box carton panels, to facilitate container lift and handling—such as to preserve control when pouring.
Push in handle flaps or tabs are desirably profiled or omitted altogether to avoid abrasion interference with bag liners upon relative movement in transit.
In some constructions, a discrete insert, such as a vacuum form, thin plastics sheet, shelf, ledge or tray, is fitted between a carton top (lid closure) flap and a bag neck location or retention rim.
In other variants, a stiffener, reinforcement or bracing plate—which can also serve as a spillage or splash guard—is integrated with a carton panel, such as a folding top or lid flap.
In yet other variants, a stiffener profile is mounted upon, or integrated with, a bag neck rim, or an existing location flange for a fill station support.
Hexagonal flanges or flanges with opposed flats are known for this purpose.
A judicious combination of such variants may also be adopted—where stiffening and location is shared between a supplementary insert, bag and carton.
These features allow use of a BIB configuration upon a jerrycan fill line—with minimal or no adaptation.
This makes it easier for an existing jerrycan user to switch to a BIB container package according to the invention—for the various packaging and disposal advantages outlined herein.
According to another aspect of the invention a container comprises an outer (box) carton with a recessed edge panel and an internal bag liner located and retained within the carton by a neck support collar such that a protruding bag neck is inset within the recess.
In a particular construction, a (collapse) fold box carton, of semi-rigid sheet material, [configured for a flexible walled inner liner] has a [location] aperture to receive a bag liner fill/discharge neck; and a preformed neck piece, configured to interfit between carton and bag neck.
Cartons are conveniently corrugated cardboard—for stiffness without undue weight—and faced with a smooth outer layer for printing.
That said, solid board and board with a variety of surface treatment(s)—such as for moisture resistance—may be employed.
The cardboard is desirably moisture resistant to survive a wet fill environment without material degradation.
Liners are thin walled synthetic plastics sheet—single or multiple ply, with edge jointing seams configured to afford a desired filled profile.
In a particular construction, a neck mounting or location aperture may be located in a tuck-in top flap of a folding carton blank.
A preformed insert of semi-rigid synthetic plastics material is configured as a neck collar, or yoke, for installation between carton and liner at juxtaposed liner neck and carton neck aperture regions.
Operationally, carton (pre-)assembly and erection into a 3-D form could be undertaken separately from and preparatory to, bag liner insertion.
In turn, bag liner insertion could be undertaken either before or after contents fill.
In that regard, a consideration is neck piece fitment in relation to closure cap disturbance.
Thus, if neck piece fitment requires closure cap removal, and bag neck pre-insertion through a carton aperture, bag fill post carton insertion is appropriate.
For (hygiene or sterile) sensitive contents, such as foodstuffs or pharmaceuticals, contents seal attends closure cap fitment.
This precludes cap closure removal after bag fill and thus dictates neck piece fitment sequence.
For example, a carton could be part erected from a collapsed flat folded form to an erect upstand with open base flaps and pre-folded top closure flaps.
Top flaps include a tuck-in deck flap, an inboard edge of which is folded into a transverse stiffener ridge.
This ridge upstand bounds a ledge for a discrete preformed stiffener element.
The stiffener is in turn part overlaid upon installation by remaining top lid flaps.
The neck insert could have a peripheral rim upstand, with an edge flange to overlie—or be sandwiched between—in-turned top flaps.
The neck insert—with features of the present invention (ie not merely a retention clip)—may be an interference, slot or snap-action fit upon a liner bag neck.
There now follows a description of some particular embodiments of the invention, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic and schematic drawings, in which:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
Thus, say, given a filled bag is more securely kept upright, that is with neck uppermost—as reflected in FIGS. 6A-B—the variant of
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
More specifically:
Such a cut-out is advantageous either for:
More specifically:
More specifically:
A BIB container package assembly 10 comprises an inner bag liner 12 fitted within an outer box carton 11.
To achieve a rectangular or cuboid 3-D erect form, the 2-D carton blank 20 is subdivided into a series of generally rectangular side panels 18, bounded by respective foldable end flaps 17, 19 forming the erected carton lid or base.
Various cuts, creases and score lines or folds are incorporated to pre-dispose the carton blank 20 into a fold and interlock for erect sequence.
Collapse fold of an erected carton may also be accommodated.
A significant difference over conventional cartons is a waisted neck flap 16 with aperture 24 for a bag liner neck 13.
This neck flap 16 folds to an inset ledge or recessed platform for a bag liner neck 13— and is in turn supplemented by a neck piece 14.
The neck piece 14 may be:
Variant neck piece 14 forms and features are depicted in
In the assembly 10, a bag contents (fill and discharge) access neck 13 protrudes from an (upper) end flap 16 of the box carton 11 through an aperture 24.
The bag neck 13 is located by a neck piece insert or location and restraint collar 14, which engages a location rim 15 at the neck base and overlies a box carton top closure or lid flap 16.
The bag neck 13 is thus restrained from retreating into the box carton 11.
Bag neck 13 may incorporate screw thread grooves 28 for complementary interfit with a screw threaded closure cap 26.
The neck piece 14 is an open-sided shallow tray, with a ‘C’—shape rim upstand and peripheral flange 25, marginally overlying a box carton upper lid flap 17.
This allows BIB use at a contents fill station for conventional jerrycans—at which neck loads are applied to trigger discharge valve operation.
Side wall and end panel handle grip apertures 21 are provided for handling upon box carton 11 assembly.
These handle apertures may feature a hinged closure flap, readily contrived cutting only part of the aperture boundary profile, and creasing a residual jointing or entrainment edge.
As is evident from
The box carton 11 has closed top flaps 17 and pre-folded inset or recessed ledge 16, ready to receive a discrete neck piece 14, as shown in
Neck 14 piece fitment, such as shown in
Again, the box carton 11 is part pre-assembled into a wrap, but with closed bottom end flaps 19 and open top flaps 17, 41 for access.
As the bag liner 12 remains accessible throughout box carton insertion, such top-loading might be adopted for either an empty or filled bag liner 12.
An extended top flap 41, with split or bifurcated limbs 42 about neck location aperture 43, guide bag neck access, and folds down, bringing the bag along with it, culminating in closure and formation of a recess for the otherwise protruding bag neck 13, as depicted in
A top lid flap 41, with bifurcated opposed guidance limbs 42 to a neck location 43, is turned back to facilitate juxtaposition with a (filled) bag liner 12, as depicted in
A top plate or tray 51, with integral step ledge or recess 52 around a neck location aperture 53, substitutes for carton top lid flaps 16, 17.
Such a tray is either:
Carton and neck piece integration is implemented in another way in
The strip is brought over a filled bag liner 12, as depicted in
Carton lift by such handles 64 thus helps secure the wrap around the liner and vulnerable bottom flap joins are avoided in favour of a continuous panel (loop or ring) sequence.
The choice of individual and co-operative box carton 11 and bag liner 12 configurations reflects the intended assembly and fill sequence.
The bag liners and/or box cartons can feature neck piece fitment, connection or integration—preparatory to uniting of bag liner and respective box carton wrap while still entrained in a continuous web.
In a concertina fold stack of
Box carton 11 flat pack facility is contingent to some extent upon recessed neck piece 14 profile—hence the advantage of the shallow tray 31 forms of
In that regard, introducing a drip guard or splash back extension 35, as indicated in broken line in
Again, bag liner 12 pre-fill or post-fill can be accommodated.
Alternative neck piece configurations may include an integral funnel 38, a flip-top lid 32, a pourer or spout 33, a pop-out handle 34, a frangible tear strip 36, or a lock 37.
Compact transport and storage can be preserved for either bag liner 12 or box carton 11 elements, individually or together, until pre-erection of a hollow shell format preparatory to contents fill.
Conceivably, contents fill itself could be used to promote such pre-erection of interfitted bag liner 12 and collapse folded box carton 11—albeit not shown.
That said, corresponding bag liner 12 insertion and neckpiece 14 fitment considerations, such as of
Similarly, with the minimal neck cut-out box carton variant 80 of
Neck location lid (end) flap or panel 16 of
In an alternative format, a bag neck location panel 76 occupies only a localised (mid-) portion of a carton lid flap or panel 73, as depicted in
Moreover, lid panel 73 interlock can be substituted by simple lid panel 73 mutual overlay and adhesive bonding and/or supplementary edge joint taping 27.
Thus, an inset (bag neck location) panel 76 has an aperture 71 to receive a bag neck 13 (not shown).
Neck panel 76 spans between a base edge fold 77, marginally inset from the top edge of a side panel 78 and a step fold panel 72 intruding into lid panel 73.
A corner cut-out profile 74 of adjacent lid panels 79 accommodates the neck panel 76 when the lids are folded over to close the carton top, as depicted in
Rounded corners may be adopted to relieve stress and complement a corresponding neck piece profile, or a rectangular corner may be overlaid by a rounded neck piece corner profile.
In that carton closed condition, the neck panel 76 is inset as a recessed ledge 81.
A discrete pre-profiled neck piece insert 75, configured as a shallow open-sided tray, is sited upon ledge 81, as shown in
The carton variant of
Upon carton closure, as depicted in
Into this neck aperture 83 is fitted a pre-formed neck piece 75, for bag liner 12 insert retention at a protruding bag neck 13, as depicted in
A further carton variant is shown in
Alternatively, neck aperture 94 could be provided on along the wider carton side 95.
The carton blank 90 in
Consequently, an off-set flap overlay results upon carton closure.
This is complete with internal bag, neck piece and closure cap fitment.
In
Generally, for simplicity of fabrication, rectangular carton forms are convenient, in principle other, say curvilinear forms could be contrived with appropriate delineation of cuts, creases or folds in a 2-D carton blank.
Either single or multiple, co-operatively interacting carton blank forms may be employed—say for increased overall sizing, beyond individual carton sheet supply constraints and/or more complex forms.
Inter-nesting carton and/or bag forms may be employed for greater robustness and security.
Thus, say, a multiple-walled structure would afford redundancy against impact or penetration—useful in spillage containment for hazardous contents.
Mix'n Match Features
The various embodiment features may be ‘mixed and matched’ selectively—albeit it is not feasible to show every possible feature permutation or combination.
JERRIBOX™ vs Jerrycan
The following outline is presented by way of supplementary perspective upon the particular embodiments described separately, in relation to traditional jerrycans:
Overall Objective
A so-called JERRIBOX™ {which term is used for convenience herein} according to the present invention is a bag-in-box container package emulating certain traditional plastic [jerrycan] container characteristics, whilst delivering significant supply chain benefits.
It represents an integrated packaging approach to containerisation.
Positive jerrycan characteristics summarise as:
A JERRIBOX™ provides these characteristics, but in a BIB package—with a pack look of a jerrycan container and equivalent functionality.
Thus, for example, the cap is exposed and the pouring handle is behind the cap.
Moreover, in terms of competitive containers, smaller sized jerrycans are commonly assembled into a combination pack within an outer box—to facilitate palletisation and allow surface graphics.
The JERRIBOX™ obviates the need for outer carton wraps and allows shrink-wrapping of stacked units.
JERRIBOX™ Features
Moreover, the JERRIBOX™ provides major benefits compared with a conventional jerrycan container:
1. In-bound Material Logistics
JERRIBOX™ can be supplied flat-packed, in pallets or containers.
Jerrycans are supplied as complete bottles and inevitably involve shipping fresh air.
This means frequent packaging replenishment delivery and unproductive use of valuable packaging storage space.
A recent customer study showed a former need for 250 pallets a week of jerrycans reduced to 25 pallets a month of flat-pack BIB material.
2. Individual Usage
The flat pack facility of JERRIBOX™ is also beneficial beyond business-to-business applications.
Thus, camping caravanning and other outdoor pursuits can gain from travelling space usually occupied by large, fixed-form, water carriers.
Water carriers supplied flat-packed could also be of major advantage in disaster relief.
Flat-pack fuel containers are also feasible, with appropriate materials.
Containers could feature integrated ground wheels or skids and bespoke trolley carriages contrived.
3. Out-Bound Logistics
JERRIBOX™ containers filled with product are more efficiently packed, stacked, palletised and containerised than jerrycans.
The latter are usually packed overlapping the pallet (periphery) to help achieve a more stable load.
Jerrycans also lose capacity to handles and radiused surfaces.
A JERRIBOX™ could be sized to fit standard pallets precisely, for an intrinsically stable load.
That is close mutual juxtaposition and abutment of load elements inhibits their relative movement.
A JERRIBOX™ pack is lighter than an equivalent size jerrycan—contributing to pack load efficiency.
4. Waste Disposal
At the far end of the supply chain many jerrycan products are difficult to dispose of into the waste stream.
This can result in elaborate and costly ‘reverse logistics’.
JERRIBOX™ again takes advantage of flat-pack benefits as the plastic and paper elements divide easily into respective waste streams.
The lower packaging weight gives cost advantages in packaging waste obligations.
5. Product Presentation
A JERRIBOX™ container outer surface can display product branding, promotion and information—in simple formats through to multi colour high quality laminated finishes.
In contrast, Jerrycans are usually limited to labelling or sleeves—with limited decorative surface.
JERRIBOX™ Design
To ensure that JERRIBOX™ competes effectively with the jerrycan at the most important point . . . in the hands of the end user . . . several design elements have been created.
1.
Bags used in the JERRIBOX™ range may be generic free-form pillow bags or of complementary rectangular format, such as from the proprietary QUAD range, manufactured by C-PAC International.
They have two features complementary to the JERRIBOX™ and significant to achieving jerrycan container feature emulation, vis:
Such bags are available in a wide range of sizes and materials, and in single or double layer formats.
Liquids from most industries can be accommodated.
2.
JERRIBOX™ features an integral recessed or inset supporting ‘shelf’, or bracing ledge, for a container neck and cap.
The recess allows inset of an otherwise protruding neck and closure cap within a rectangular outer box carton profile—allowing space-efficient compact stacking and packing, such as upon palletisation.
The shelf profile interlocks with other carton (top) flaps, for maximum strength.
This shelf uses minimum material and is within an otherwise conventional ‘0201’ box configuration.
An exposed accessible cap and filler is an important functional link with a jerrycan and allows former users of jerrycans to fill with existing equipment.
Over a JERRIBOX™ range, box sizes have been optimised for palletisation on regular and eur-pallets.
3.
This supporting shelf—and its function of holding a liquid (bag) container neck of—is enhanced by a pre-formed plastics collar insert, or neck piece, configured to:
The collar is shaped to:
The collar also locally reinforces the box, while partially surrounding and protecting the cap.
Pack integrity is maintained in pallet stacking, or if the pack is dropped onto its top face.
Collar profile may be minimised—for consistency with carton flat-pack, or optionally extended—as a splash guard to prevent local carton soaking at the neck.
Collar design also enhances JERRIBOX™ identity and appearance—making it immediately identifiable as a jerrycan competitor or substitute.
4.
The collar provides a basis for optional features, vis:
Tamper evident seals and even cap locks are feasible.
Collar and attachment sizing allows adaptation for different sized necks.
5.
The box carton admits die-cut flat material.
Overall, JERRIBOX™ equals or betters entrenched plastic jerrycan functionality.
Environmental water, damp or splash proofing can be accommodated.
Filling and dispensing can also create dampness—although the collar protects the carton from spillage.
Occasional leakage can be contained by proofed carton board.
This avoids individual wetted box collapse and entire pallet spoilage risks.
Carton board options embrace:
Most such boards are available in a wide range of printed formats.
It is anticipated that fully waterproofed solid board will be a lead constituent.
6.
A size range can imitate/emulate the jerrycan, vis:
Unlike prohibitive mould tooling costs for jerrycans, it would feasible, at relatively modest cost, to contrive bespoke JERRIBOX™ sizes and configurations for particular customer and market needs—such as imperial, metric or US volumetric measures.
7.
Package assembly is an important consideration, given that existing industrial jerrycan users do not need to assemble the pack—although labelling is an extra activity.
The drawings variously depict assembly and tape or glue closure, undertaken by mixed manual and mechanised operations, together with automated pre-assembly of bag liner and box carton.
8.
For some important market sectors, the JERRIBOX™ will need to pass UN certification testing—although there is a large market where this is not essential.
Certification will likely be with fully water-proofed solid board cartoning.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0314815.2 | Jun 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/002609 | 6/17/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/20/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/000705 | 1/6/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1207421 | Lord | Dec 1916 | A |
2412544 | Waters | Dec 1946 | A |
2721674 | Lazard | Oct 1955 | A |
2946494 | Kuss | Jul 1960 | A |
2954901 | Winstead | Oct 1960 | A |
2973119 | Parker | Feb 1961 | A |
3042271 | Winstead | Jul 1962 | A |
3087655 | Scholle | Apr 1963 | A |
3090526 | Hamilton et al. | May 1963 | A |
3100587 | Cox, Jr. | Aug 1963 | A |
3171571 | Daniels | Mar 1965 | A |
3184117 | Sanderson | May 1965 | A |
3233817 | Casady | Feb 1966 | A |
3349960 | Ketler | Oct 1967 | A |
3363807 | Powell | Jan 1968 | A |
3448889 | Malpas | Jun 1969 | A |
3458084 | Laurizio | Jul 1969 | A |
3599840 | Speas | Aug 1971 | A |
4165023 | Schmit | Aug 1979 | A |
4174051 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4176748 | Beane | Dec 1979 | A |
4209092 | Jones | Jun 1980 | A |
4280634 | Wiesenberger et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4322018 | Rutter | Mar 1982 | A |
4379455 | Deaton | Apr 1983 | A |
4445550 | Davis et al. | May 1984 | A |
4524883 | Herring | Jun 1985 | A |
4560090 | Okushita | Dec 1985 | A |
4696840 | McCullough et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4781314 | Schoonover et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4815631 | Eeg et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834255 | Boots | May 1989 | A |
5156295 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5265753 | Moorman | Nov 1993 | A |
5474203 | Baker | Dec 1995 | A |
5715992 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5803346 | Baker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826752 | Latimer | Oct 1998 | A |
5909841 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6053401 | Andrews, Sr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059182 | Wein | May 2000 | A |
6062431 | Geshay | May 2000 | A |
6196452 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209781 | Sylvester et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6290124 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6375040 | Allanson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378733 | Boonzaier | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446859 | Holladay | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6637623 | Muise et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651845 | Schroeder | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6736289 | Cook et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6877654 | Bartlett et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20010030228 | Todjar-Hengami | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020047040 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030160092 | Philips et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
89082702 | Jul 1989 | DE |
3802793 | Aug 1989 | DE |
0053310 | Nov 1981 | EP |
0225677 | Jun 1987 | EP |
1 129 961 | May 2001 | EP |
2 112 854 | Nov 1970 | FR |
2 371 355 | Jun 1978 | FR |
2 436 082 | Sep 1978 | FR |
2 446 233 | Dec 1978 | FR |
2 483 893 | Jun 1980 | FR |
2 624 107 | Nov 1988 | FR |
927866 | Oct 1959 | GB |
959306 | May 1964 | GB |
1207421 | Sep 1970 | GB |
2403467 | May 2005 | GB |
8048376 | Feb 1996 | JP |
10147369 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10251417 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000 185743 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2002012265 | Jan 2002 | JP |
WO- 8808401 | Nov 1988 | WO |
WO- 9119651 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9314984 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9419255 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9601766 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 0121496 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2005080219 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005080219 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060180643 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |