The output devices used in or with some printers, copiers, and other sheet media processing machines include a bail to help control sheets discharged to a stack of sheets. The sheets slide under the bail as they are discharged on to the stack, for example to stop each sheet in the desired position in the output tray.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures. The figures are not necessarily to scale.
Some sheet media processing machines are capable of processing multiple different sheet types and sizes. The speed, force, or other sheet discharge conditions may vary in a particular machine or between different machines that utilize the same type of output device. For example, the bail force desired to properly control a sheet of uncoated A3 size printer paper may be inadequate to properly control a shorter stiffer A4 sheet of paper or a slicker sheet of coated paper.
A new bail system has been developed to help expand the range of forces a bail can deliver to accommodate a greater variety of media sheets and discharge conditions. In one example, a bail system includes a bail to apply a force to the sheets, a spring or other bias mechanism to counter the force of the bail on the sheets, and a control mechanism to control the degree to which the bias mechanism counters the force of the bail on the sheet. The control mechanism may be implemented, for example, using a lost motion coupler between the bail axle and the bail and between the axle and a motor drive train, to control the torque applied to the bail axle by the bias spring. The control mechanism may be implemented, for another example, using an actuator to vary the tension in the bias spring, to control the torque applied to the bail axle by the spring.
These and other examples shown in the figures and described below illustrate but do not limit the scope of the patent, which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
As used in this document: “and/or” means one or more of the connected things; a “bail” means a hinged arm to hold or position media sheets in a tray; a “bias mechanism” means a mechanism to urge something toward a position or state; a “lost motion coupler” means a coupler in which a gap between the parts creates a range of motion through which a part may be moved without applying force or motion to another part; a “processor readable medium” means any non-transitory tangible medium that can embody, contain, store, or maintain instructions for use by a processor and may include, for example, circuits, integrated circuits, ASICs (application specific integrated circuits), hard drives, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and memory cards and sticks and other portable storage devices; and a “tray” means a structure to support media sheets including, for example, an input tray or an output bin.
Counter force bias spring 19 is connected to axle 22 through a lever arm 28 to exert a biasing torque on the axle, as indicated by arrow 30 in
Also in this example, bias spring 19 is configured as an extension spring connected between a chassis or other stationary part 36 and lever arm 28. A linear actuator 21 controls the length of spring 19 to adjust the counter force applied to bail 14. Actuator 21 may be operated manually, or actuator 21 may be operated automatically using a motor and programmable controller. Although a rack and pinion actuator 21 is shown, any suitable linear actuator may be used to adjust the length of an extension spring 20. Other suitable spring/actuator configurations are possible. For example, a torsion spring connected to axle 22 could be used in combination with a rotary actuator, to apply the desired counter force to bail 14.
In one example, spring 19, actuator 21, and lever arm 28 are configured together to achieve a range of counter forces between 0 and something exceeding the weight of bail 14. When actuator 21 is set to apply 0 counter force, then the bail force is unaffected by spring 19. When actuator 21 is set to apply a counter force greater than 0 but less than the weight of bail 14, then bail 14 will continue to rest on tray 12 (or sheets in tray 12) with a bail force less than the weight of bail 14. When actuator 21 is set to apply a counter force greater than the weight of bail 14, then bail 14 will be lifted off tray 12 to further reduce or eliminate the bail force applied to sheets moved into tray 12.
Control mechanism 20 also includes a second lost motion coupler 54 to couple axle 22 to bail 14. In this example, lost motion coupler 54 includes pin 32 on axle 22 and a slot 34 in bail 14. Pin 32 can engage bail 14 at each end of slot 34. Slot 34 forms a gap that creates a range of motion through which one or both of pin 32 and bail 14 may be moved without applying force or motion to the other part, for example to allow bail 14 to be lifted as media sheets are added to tray 12.
The direction of torque 30 (
When motor 38 rotates drive finger 44 clockwise against gap end 48 to override spring 19, then axle 22 rotates clockwise to move axle pin 32 away from the countering end of bail slot 34, to decouple bail 14 from bias spring 19 (no counter force applied to bail 14), as shown in
The use of two lost motion couplers 42, 54 enables the selective application of a counter force to bail 14 while still allowing bail 14 to function free of any force from either spring 19 or motor 38. For example, without a lost motion coupler 54 to couple axle 22 to bail 14, motor 38 could not override spring 19 without also depressing bail 14, and without a lost motion coupler 42 to couple motor 38 to axle 22, motor 38 would always override spring 19 (by always applying a torque to axle 22) thus rendering spring 19 ineffective to counter the bail force.
As shown in
As noted above, the examples shown in the figures and described herein illustrate but do not limit the patent, which is defined in the following Claims.
“A”, “an” and “the” used in the claims means one or more. For example, “a bias mechanism” means one or more bias mechanisms and “the bias mechanism” means the one or more bias mechanisms.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/055532 | 10/5/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/067144 | 4/12/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3951264 | Heidecker | Apr 1976 | A |
4852868 | Fukui et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5078379 | Leisner | Jan 1992 | A |
5260759 | Kobayashi | Nov 1993 | A |
5462267 | Hori | Oct 1995 | A |
5915690 | Surya | Jun 1999 | A |
6126164 | Rennick et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6547238 | Ardery et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
8006971 | Iguchi et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
9206010 | Shelhart et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20070069454 | Ino | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20140061994 | Mimura et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150307311 | Ono | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20190144221 | Lo | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S63144063 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04277159 | Oct 1992 | JP |
H06-171775 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2009067595 | Apr 2009 | JP |
WO-2004061787 | Jul 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200031147 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |