The field of the invention is hydraulic control systems for borehole tools and more particularly systems that employ a control line and a balance line to the surface with a floating piston isolating a balance chamber. In the event leakage of tubing pressure prevents downward movement of the floating piston on safety valve closure, a pressure equalization enabled by applied pressure on the balance line allows reset of the floating piston to allow continued operation of the safety valve despite the tubing pressure leak.
Subsurface safety valves are typically hydraulically controlled from a remote location using one or two control lines. An advantage of a two control line system is that hydrostatic pressure in each line is canceled out so that a closure spring for a flow tube does not need to resist hydrostatic pressure as is the case with single control line systems. In two line control systems pressure on top of an operating piston moves a flow tube against a flapper to open the valve. Removal of such pressure from the main control line allows a closure spring to reverse movement of the flow tube to allow the flapper to rotate 90 degrees to closed position of the safety valve. In the past operators have wanted or regulations required a barrier in the second or balance control line so that if tubing pressure leaks into the hydraulic system there would be a barrier to keep hydrocarbons from reaching a surface location through the balance line.
The floating piston in the balance line served this purpose as a barrier. In normal valve operations pressure applied in the main control line to the top of a piston whose movement shifted the flow tube would result in hydraulic fluid displacement to the underside of the floating piston. Conversely, as pressure was removed from the main control line and the closure spring pushed up the flow tube hydraulic fluid would be drawn into the safety valve from under the floating piston to enable the safety valve to close. The floating piston would just move up when the safety valve open and reverse its motion when the safety valve closed, each time displacing an equal volume of hydraulic fluid as movement of the operating piston had displaced. The floating piston was sometimes biased toward the down position to put it in the ready position for safety valve opening.
Sometimes, seals could leak in such safety valve hydraulic systems such that the much higher tubing pressure could leak into the balance control line and against the underside of the floating piston. This could happen slowly taking months or even years to reach an extreme condition where the floating piston would be up against an upper travel stop with tubing pressure under it. As a result the safety would not be functional to open since the operating piston in the safety valve could not displace hydraulic fluid because the floating piston could not move because it was forced against an upward travel stop due to tubing pressure leaking past a seal. When this happened in the past the safety valve would need to be removed, which caused very expensive downtime.
The present invention is a reconfiguration of the two control line system that incorporates the floating piston working normally the same way as it worked in the past. What is different is the addition of an operable one way valve that can be opened with pressure applied to the balance line such that when such equalizing valve was forced open from the balance line applied pressure, the pressure on opposed sides of the floating piston could equalize and the position of the floating piston could change. The floating piston, now placed in pressure balance on its opposed ends could be biased away from its upper travel stop. Doing this would again make the safety valve operable to open as the hydraulic system would no longer be liquid locked by virtue of the floating piston sitting against its upper travel stop under tubing pressure. In essence the balance line pressure would be raised to the level of the tubing pressure or less depending on seal geometries to get the equalizer valve to open to allow a return spring acting on the floating piston to bias it back to a lower travel stop to allow reopening of the valve without well shutdown and safety valve removal. Many times the seal leakage is so slow that the ability to reposition the floating piston can allow many more years of service for the safety valve. These and other aspects of the present invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is to be determined from the appended claims. The following references are illustrative of control systems used in the past for safety valves in a borehole application: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,906,220; 7,743,833; 8,534,317 and US 2008/0314599.
An operating control line is in communication with an operating piston for the safety valve as well as an equalizing piston such that pressure in the operating control line opens the safety valve and holds the equalizer valve closed. A balance chamber receives fluid from an operating piston in the safety valve when the valve opens to displace a floating piston to the open position. Operating control line pressure reduction allows valve closure and opposite floating piston movement to the closed position. If the floating piston is forced by a tubing seal leak against the open position travel stop, pressure in a balance control line against the equalizing valve member moves it from a seat to then equalize pressure on opposed ends of the floating piston allowing a bias force to move the floating piston off the open position stop so the safety valve can open despite the tubing leak.
Referring to
Operating control line 12 branches into lines 30 and 32. Line 32 goes to the top of the operating piston inside the safety valve 14 and line 30 goes to the underside of equalizing valve 34 at inlet 36 below the valve member 38 that has a seal 40 to hold the pressure in the operating control line 12. Coming out of the safety valve 14 from below the operating piston of the safety valve 14 is line 44 that branches into lines 46 and 48. Line 46 goes into an annular space where spring 42 is located. Spring 42 pushes up on valve member 38 to hold head 50 against seat 52. Pressure in line 46 acts below head 50 also acts in the same direction as spring 42. Note that the seal area at seat 52 is larger than the seal 40 so that pressure in line 46 creates a net force on head 50 against seat 52. Stop 54 limits the movement of head 50 away from seat 52. Lines 56 and 58 join to become the balance line 60 that goes to a remote surface location. As previously stated the purpose of line 60 is to offset the hydrostatic pressure in operating control line 12 but it has another purpose as will be described.
Valve member 38 does not move during normal operation of the safety valve 14. Floating piston 18 is in a lower position shown in
As
The pressure under the equalizing valve 34 at inlet 36 is at this time equal to the hydrostatic pressure in operating control line 12 because no pressure is being applied to operating control line 12. This pressure tends to push the valve member 38 and the head 50 toward seat 52. Opposing this force is the pressure in balance line 60 communicating with head 50 through line 56. Since the area of the head 50 is larger than seal there is a net force developed in the direction of moving the head 50 away from seat 52. As the pressure in balance line 60 in the direction of arrow 62 increases so does the net force on the valve member 38 until the force of spring 42 is overcome and the
If the balance chamber 16 loses pressure/volume, the floating piston 18 will move to compensate for that volume loss. If the floating piston reaches its downward stop 26, it will not be able to compensate for any additional fluid loss from the balance chamber 16. If the balance chamber continues to lose pressure, a pressure differential will be created across the equalizer piston 38 causing an opening force on the equalizing piston 38. This opening force is created by hydrostatic pressures from the balance line 60 and control line 12 acting on the area differential between the larger seal on the head 50 of the equalizing piston 38 and the smaller seal 40 on the equalizing piston 38. These pressures are normally counter-acted by the pressure of the balance chamber 16 in the annular area around the equalizing piston 38 but differential pressures are formed across the head 50 and seal 40 of the equalizing piston 38 when pressure decreases in the balance chamber 16. When the balance chamber 16 has lost sufficient pressure to create a sufficient pressure differential to overcome the closing force of the equalizing spring 42 the equalizing piston will shift open and pressure/volume from line 60 will travel through line 56 and refill the lost pressure/volume from the balance chamber 16.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the equalizer valve 34 is piped up to be in parallel with the end connections on the floating piston 18 such that its opening, however achieved, puts the floating piston in pressure balance in the balance line 60. At that point the bias of spring 20 repositions the floating piston 18 closer to valve 14 as shown in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5906220 | Thompson | May 1999 | A |
7743833 | Casciaro et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8534317 | Plunkett et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20030168219 | Sloan | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20080314599 | Bane et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20120073829 | Smith | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130056222 | Smith et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0915230 | May 1999 | EP |
2434090 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2015084529 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170268314 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |