Balanced adaptive body bias control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7949864
  • Patent Number
    7,949,864
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 28, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 24, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods of balanced adaptive body bias control. In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, a method of balanced adaptive body bias control comprises determining a desirable dynamic condition for circuitry of an integrated circuit. A first dynamic indicator corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition is accessed. Second and third dynamic indicators of the integrated circuit are accessed. A first body biasing voltage is adjusted by an increment so as to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition. A second body biasing voltage is adjusted based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments in accordance with the present invention relate to control of body bias. More specifically, embodiments in accordance with the present invention relate to balanced adaptive body bias control.


BACKGROUND

In order to operate an integrated circuit, e.g., a microprocessor, in an efficient manner, for example, to consume a low amount of energy to accomplish a task, it is known to adjust various controlling parameters. These parameters may include threshold voltage of active devices of the integrated circuit. It is known to adjust threshold voltage after manufacture of an integrated circuit by adjusting body biasing voltage(s) applied to body biasing wells of such active devices.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Systems and methods of adaptively controlling body biasing voltages to adjust threshold voltages while balancing characteristics of p type and n type devices are highly desired.


Accordingly, systems and methods of balanced adaptive body bias control are disclosed. In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, a method of balanced adaptive body bias control comprises determining a desirable dynamic condition for circuitry of an integrated circuit. A first dynamic indicator corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition is accessed. Second and third dynamic indicators of the integrated circuit are accessed. A first body biasing voltage is adjusted by an increment so as to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition. A second body biasing voltage is adjusted based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.


Advantageously, embodiments in accordance with the present invention control two body biasing voltages as two one-dimensional problems, rather than as a two-dimensional problem. This reduces complexity of the control solution from an order two, e.g., quadratic, problem to an order one, e.g., linear, problem, greatly reducing computational resources required to implement such control solutions, while also reducing characterization time and complexity, which simplifies modeling of the control system.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an integrated circuit, for example, a microprocessor, comprising dynamic condition reporting registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary computer controlled method of balanced adaptive body bias control, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description of the present invention, balanced adaptive body bias control, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or with equivalents thereof. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.


Notation and Nomenclature

Some portions of the detailed descriptions that follow (e.g., process 200) are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits that can be performed on computer memory. Such computer memory is functionally coupled to a processor. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. Such quantities may be represented in a wide variety of computer usable media, including, for example, computer memory, e.g., RAM or ROM, removable memory, e.g., flash memory, bubble memory, optical storage, e.g., CD or DVD, magneto-optical storage, magnetic storage, e.g., drum, hard drive, diskette or tape, paper tape, punch cards and the like. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.


It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “accessing” or “commanding” or “storing” or “dividing” or “computing” or “testing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “storing′” or “measuring” or “adjusting” or “generating” or “performing” or “comparing” or “synchronizing” or “accessing′” or “retrieving′” or “conveying′” or “sending” or “resuming′” or “installing” or “gathering” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device” that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Balanced Adaptive Body Bias Control

Embodiments in accordance with the present invention are described in the context of design and operation of integrated semiconductors. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to balanced adaptive body bias control. It is appreciated, however, that elements of the present invention may be utilized in other areas of semiconductor design and operation.


The following description of embodiments in accordance with the present invention is directed toward pFETs (or p-type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETS)) formed in surface N-wells and/or nFETs (or n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells when a p-type substrate and an N-well process are utilized. It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments in accordance with the present invention are equally applicable to nFETs (e.g., n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells and/or pFETs (e.g., p-type MOSFETS) formed in surface N-wells when an n-type substrate and a P-well process are utilized. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention are well suited to a variety of types of semiconductors supporting electrically adjustable transistor threshold voltages and such embodiments are considered within the scope of the present invention. Examples of such semiconductors include a fully depleted body structure with back gate electrode separated from the body of a transistor by a buried insulator.


Several operational indicators of an integrated circuit, e.g., a microprocessor, can be measured dynamically, e.g., in-situ, while the integrated circuit is in operation. For example, the operating temperature of the integrated circuit can be measured. Such measurements can be external, e.g., via an applied thermocouple, or they can be made internally, e.g., via on-chip measurement circuits.


A wide variety of integrated circuit characteristics can be measured or determined, either directly or inferred from other characteristics, while the device is operating. For example, in addition to temperature, other characteristics such as gate delays, metal delays, leakage current, “on” current, relative behavior of NMOS and PMOS devices, maximum frequency and the like can be measured or determined for the instant operating conditions of an integrated circuit. Commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/124,152, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,172, filed Apr. 16, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Measuring Transistor Leakage Current with a Ring Oscillator” and incorporated by reference herein, provides exemplary systems and methods of such dynamic determinations, or dynamic operating indicators, that are well suited to embodiments in accordance with the present invention.


Such measurements or indications are typically made available, e.g., to control circuitry, state machines and/or processor control software, via registers. Such register values frequently comprise a count of a number of events, e.g., oscillations of a ring oscillator in a given time interval. For the purpose of illustrating embodiments in accordance with the present invention, a model of a register reporting a value that is correlated to an operating characteristic of an integrated circuit is employed. It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments in accordance with the present invention are well suited to a variety of systems and methods of determining and reporting dynamic operating conditions of an integrated circuit.



FIG. 1 illustrates an integrated circuit 100, for example, a microprocessor, comprising dynamic condition reporting registers, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.


Dynamic condition reporting registers R1101, R2102 and R3103 each indicate a dynamic condition metric of integrated circuit 100. For example, generally each dynamic condition reporting register is associated with a dynamic condition measuring circuit either as a part of the integrated circuit or external to the integrated circuit. Conversion of a measured quantity, e.g., oscillations of a ring oscillator, into a usable metric related to the measured quantity, e.g., a frequency measurement, e.g., in hertz, or a count of oscillations per unit time, can be embodied in either software or hardware, and all such embodiments are to be considered within the scope of the present invention. For example, logic circuitry can increment a counting register for each oscillation for a period of time. Alternatively, for example, a software timing loop, with or without hardware timing assistance, can count a number of oscillations per unit time. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, dynamic condition reporting registers, e.g., dynamic condition reporting registers R1101, R2102 and R3103, can refer to any memory location utilized to store such indications of a dynamic condition.


As operating conditions of integrated circuit 100 change, values reported by dynamic condition reporting registers R1101, R2102 and R3103 will generally change. For example, operating voltage and operating temperature are strong influences on gate delay and/or leakage current within an integrated circuit. Likewise, body biasing voltage(s) applied to circuitry of integrated circuit 100 also strongly influence operating conditions such as gate delay and/or leakage current. As body biasing voltage(s) applied to circuitry of integrated circuit 100 vary, so too in general will the values reported by dynamic condition reporting registers R1101, R2102 and R3103.


For example, dynamic condition reporting register R1101 can indicate a number of oscillations per time of a ring oscillator comprising complementary metal oxide inverter gates. Such a circuit can be utilized to indicate gate delays for the microprocessor at the instant operating conditions, e.g., operating temperature, operating voltage, applied body biasing voltage(s) and the like. Similarly, other dynamic condition reporting registers can indicate other operational characteristics of integrated circuit 100. For example, device leakage, gate leakage, temperature, metal delays, “on” current, behavior of n type and p type devices and/or relative behavior of n type and p type devices can be reported by dynamic condition reporting registers.


Most useful dynamic conditions indications will have a correlation with maximum achievable operating frequency of an integrated circuit at those operating conditions. For example, an indication of operating temperature will generally have a correlation with maximum achievable operating frequency. For example, for operation above a thermal null voltage, as operating temperature increases, maximum achievable operating frequency decreases. Other dynamic condition indications may have other correlations with maximum achievable operating frequency. For example, the number of oscillations of a ring oscillator per unit time may generally increase as maximum achievable operating frequency of an integrated circuit increases.


Integrated circuit 100 further comprises adjustable body biasing voltage sources 110 and 120. For example, adjustable body biasing voltage source 110 is configured to supply a body biasing voltage to n type body wells of p type metal oxide semiconductors (PMOS). Similarly, adjustable body biasing voltage source 120 is configured to supply a body biasing voltage to p type body wells of n type metal oxide semiconductors (NMOS). It is to be appreciated that embodiments in accordance with the present invention are not dependent upon the location of such body biasing voltage sources, and are well suited to body biasing voltages applied to integrated circuit 100 from external sources, e.g., voltage supplies external to integrated circuit 100.



FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary computer controlled method 200 of balanced adaptive body bias control, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In 210, a desirable dynamic condition for circuitry of an integrated circuit is determined. For example, software operating on a microprocessor may determine an operating frequency necessary to perform a particular task on the microprocessor. A desirable gate delay for circuitry of the microprocessor corresponding to such desirable operating frequency can be determined, e.g., via table lookup. Similarly, a desirable power condition of the integrated circuit can be determined.


In 220, a first dynamic indicator corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition, second and third dynamic indicators are accessed. For example, a second dynamic indicator can indicate leakage current of PMOS devices of the integrated circuit and a third dynamic indicator can indicate leakage current of NMOS devices of the integrated circuit. For example, dynamic condition reporting registers R1101, R2102 and R3103 (FIG. 1) are accessed. Embodiments of the present invention are well suited to measurements of such dynamics indicators taking place prior to or during method 200.


In 230, a first body biasing voltage is adjusted to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition. For example, if a measured gate delay is larger than a desirable gate delay, the first body biasing voltage can be decreased.


In general, the speed of operation of circuitry of an integrated circuit, e.g., maximum frequency of operation, is more sensitive to one transistor type, typically NMOS, while circuit leakage is more sensitive to the other transistor type, typically PMOS. A determination of which body biasing voltage to adjust first, e.g., in 230, should correspond to which body biasing voltage has a greater effect on the desirable dynamic condition. For example, if the desirable dynamic condition is maximum frequency of operation, body biasing voltage applied to NMOS devices, e.g., a p well voltage, should be adjusted first.


In 240, a second body biasing voltage is adjusted based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.


In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, it is not necessary to specify a particular body biasing voltage to a body biasing voltage supply. Rather, method 200 can signal such body biasing voltage supply to increase or decrease the particular body biasing voltage relative to a previous condition of the body biasing voltage. Generally, such relative changes are beneficially less computationally intense than determining an absolute value for a body biasing voltage. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the relative adjustment in body biasing voltage (230, 240) may be the minimum increment of adjustment available from the body biasing voltage supplies, e.g., adjustable body biasing voltage sources 110 and 120 of FIG. 1. An exemplary value of such minimum increments or step sizes is 20 mV. It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments in accordance with the present invention are well suited to determining an absolute value, e.g., via table lookup, for a body biasing voltage based on a desirable adjustment to a dynamic indicator.


Relation 1, below, illustrates an exemplary relationship between a second dynamic indicator and a third dynamic indicator:

|(Ioffn−scale*Ioffp)|  (Relation 1)

where Ioffn is a dynamic indication of leakage current of n type devices, Ioffp is a dynamic indication of leakage current of p type devices, scale is a scaling factor and “|” indicates the absolute value operation.


The scaling factor used within Relation 1 can be used to adjust for variations between n type and p type devices within an integrated circuit. For example, n type devices are typically faster than p type devices, and may generally be designed to have less leakage current for a given maximum frequency of operation in comparison to p type devices. For example, such a scaling factor can be used to adjust for such variations in leakage current. It is appreciated that the scaling factor need not be linear and may be unity.


In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the second body biasing voltage is adjusted so as to minimize a value of Relation 1. For example, the second body biasing voltage is adjusted a minimum increment in a direction, e.g., increased or decreased, so as to minimize a value of Relation 1.


It is to be appreciated that other relationships among dynamic indicators may be used in 240, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. For example, a quadratic relationship is well suited to embodiments of the present invention.


In optional 250, an interval, e.g., a settling delay, is delayed for changes in body biasing voltages to have an effect. An exemplary delay might be ten microseconds. In optional 260, control reverts to 210 and the method repeats.


It is to be appreciated that virtually any measurable dynamic condition, as well as relationships among such measurable dynamic conditions, can be used as the second and third dynamic indicators in method 200, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. In addition to the previously described leakage currents, e.g., “off” currents, for example, “on” currents, gate delays by transistor type, combinations, e.g., ratios of “on” current to “off” current by transistor type and the like may be utilized as such second and third dynamic indicators, and are well suited to embodiments of the present invention.


Similarly, it is to be appreciated that virtually any measurable dynamic condition, as well as relationships among such measurable dynamic conditions, can be used as the desirable dynamic condition. In addition to the previously described gate delays and maximum operating frequency, for example, “on” currents, gate delays by transistor type, combinations, e.g., ratios of “on” current to “off” current by transistor type, power consumption, chip temperature, wire-dominated delays, critical path replicas and the like may be utilized as the desirable dynamic condition, and are well suited to embodiments of the present invention.


Advantageously, embodiments in accordance with the present invention are capable of controlling two body biasing voltages as two one-dimensional problems, rather than as a two-dimensional problem. This reduces complexity of the control solution from an order two, e.g., quadratic, problem to an order one, e.g., linear, problem, greatly reducing computational resources required to implement such control solutions.


Embodiments in accordance with the present invention thus provide systems and methods of adaptively controlling body biasing voltages to adjust threshold voltages while balancing characteristics of p type and n type devices.


Embodiments in accordance with the present invention, balanced adaptive body bias control, are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: determining a desirable dynamic condition for a circuit of an integrated circuit, wherein the circuit receives a first and a second body biasing voltages;accessing a first dynamic indicator of the circuit corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition;accessing second and third dynamic indicators of the circuit;adjusting the first body biasing voltage to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition; andadjusting the second body biasing voltage based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the relationship comprises a difference between the second dynamic indicator and a scaled value of the third dynamic indicator and further wherein the adjusting acts to minimize the difference.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the desirable dynamic condition corresponds to a desirable operating frequency for the integrated circuit.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a gate delay of circuitry of the integrated circuit.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to on current of active devices of the integrated circuit.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the second dynamic indicator corresponds to leakage current of a first polarity of active devices of the integrated circuit.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the third dynamic indicator corresponds to leakage current of active devices of a second polarity opposite to the first polarity.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a critical path replica of the integrated circuit.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising delaying an interval for changes in body biasing voltages to have an effect.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising repeating the determining, the accessing the first dynamic indicator, the accessing the second and third dynamic indicators, the adjusting the first body biasing voltage and the adjusting the second body biasing voltage.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the accessing the first dynamic indicator comprises accessing a register value corresponding to the first dynamic indicator.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the adjusting the first body biasing voltage by an increment comprises adjusting the first body biasing voltage by a minimum increment of adjustment available from a body biasing voltage supply.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the integrated circuit is a microprocessor.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the first body biasing voltage has a greater effect on the desirable dynamic condition than the second body biasing voltage.
  • 15. A computer system comprising: a microprocessor integrated circuit;first and second body biasing voltage supplies coupled to the microprocessor integrated circuit for furnishing selectable voltages to first and second body biasing wells of the microprocessor integrated circuit;a memory space coupled to the microprocessor integrated circuit and comprising instructions to implement a method of balanced adaptive body bias control comprising:determining a desirable dynamic condition for circuitry of the microprocessor integrated circuit;accessing a first dynamic indicator corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition;accessing second and third dynamic indicators of the integrated circuit;adjusting the first body biasing voltage supply to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition; andadjusting the second body biasing voltage supply based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein the desirable dynamic condition corresponds to a desirable operating frequency for the microprocessor integrated circuit.
  • 17. The system of claim 16 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a gate delay of circuitry of the microprocessor integrated circuit.
  • 18. The system of claim 15 wherein the accessing the first dynamic indicator comprises accessing a register value in an address space of the microprocessor integrated circuit corresponding to the first dynamic indicator.
  • 19. The system of claim 15 wherein the adjusting the first body biasing voltage supply by an increment comprises adjusting the first body biasing voltage supply by a minimum increment of adjustment available from the first body biasing voltage supply.
  • 20. The system of claim 15 wherein the first body biasing voltage has a greater effect on the desirable dynamic condition than the second body biasing voltage.
  • 21. An article of manufacture including a computer usable media comprising instructions stored thereon that, responsive to execution on a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations comprising: determining a desirable dynamic condition for circuitry of an integrated circuit;accessing a first dynamic indicator corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition;accessing second and third dynamic indicators of the integrated circuit;adjusting a first body biasing voltage so as to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition; andadjusting a second body biasing voltage based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
  • 22. The article of manufacture of claim 21 wherein the desirable dynamic condition corresponds to a desirable operating frequency for the integrated circuit.
  • 23. The article of manufacture of claim 21 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a gate delay of circuitry of the integrated circuit.
  • 24. The article of manufacture of claim 21 wherein the accessing the first dynamic indicator comprises accessing a register value corresponding to the first dynamic indicator.
  • 25. The article of manufacture of claim 21 wherein the adjusting the first body biasing voltage comprises adjusting the first body biasing voltage by a minimum increment of adjustment available from a body biasing voltage supply.
  • 26. A method comprising: determining a desirable dynamic condition for a circuit of an integrated circuit, wherein the circuit receives a first well and a second well body biasing voltages;accessing a first dynamic indicator of the circuit corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition;accessing second and third dynamic indicators of the circuit;adjusting the first well body biasing voltage to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition; andadjusting the second well body biasing voltage based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
  • 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the relationship comprises a difference between the second dynamic indicator and a non-unity scaled value of the third dynamic indicator and further wherein the adjusting acts to minimize the difference.
  • 28. The method of claim 26 wherein the desirable dynamic condition corresponds to a desirable operating frequency for the integrated circuit.
  • 29. The method of claim 26 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a gate delay of circuitry of the integrated circuit.
  • 30. The method of claim 26 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to on current of active devices of the integrated circuit.
  • 31. The method of claim 26 wherein the second dynamic indicator corresponds to leakage current of a first polarity of active devices of the integrated circuit.
  • 32. The method of claim 31 wherein the third dynamic indicator corresponds to leakage current of active devices of a second polarity opposite to the first polarity.
  • 33. An integrated circuit comprising: means for determining a desirable dynamic condition for a circuit of the integrated circuit, wherein the circuit receives a first well and a second well body biasing voltages;means for accessing a first dynamic indicator of the circuit corresponding to the desirable dynamic condition;means for accessing second and third dynamic indicators of the circuit;means for adjusting the first body biasing voltage to change the first dynamic indicator in the direction of the desirable dynamic condition; andmeans for adjusting the second body biasing voltage based on a relationship between the second dynamic indicator and the third dynamic indicator.
  • 34. The integrated circuit of claim 33 wherein the first dynamic indicator corresponds to a critical path replica of the integrated circuit.
  • 35. The integrated circuit of claim 33 further comprising delaying an interval for changes in body biasing voltages to have an effect.
  • 36. The integrated circuit of claim 33 further comprising means for repeating the determining, the accessing the first dynamic indicator, the accessing the second and the third dynamic indicators, the adjusting the first body biasing voltage and the adjusting the second body biasing voltage.
  • 37. The integrated circuit of claim 33 wherein the means for accessing the first dynamic indicator comprises accessing a register value corresponding to the first dynamic indicator.
  • 38. The integrated circuit of claim 33 wherein the means for adjusting the first body biasing voltage by an increment comprises adjusting the first well body biasing voltage by a minimum increment of adjustment available from a body biasing voltage supply.
  • 39. The integrated circuit of claim 33 wherein the integrated circuit is a microprocessor.
  • 40. The integrated circuit of claim 33 wherein the first well body biasing voltage has a greater effect on the desirable dynamic condition than the second well body biasing voltage.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation in part of co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/334,918, filed Dec. 31, 2002, entitled “Adaptive Power Control” to Burr et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/771,015, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,205,758, filed Feb. 2, 2004, entitled “Systems and Methods for Adjusting Threshold Voltage” to Masleid and Burr, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/956,207, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,180,322, filed Sep. 30, 2004, entitled “Closed Loop Feedback Control of Integrated Circuits” to Koniaris and Burr, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/124,152, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,172, filed Apr. 16, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Measuring Transistor Leakage Current with a Ring Oscillator” to Suzuki and Burr, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (167)
Number Name Date Kind
4335445 Nercessian Jun 1982 A
4679130 Moscovici Jul 1987 A
4739252 Malaviya et al. Apr 1988 A
4893228 Orrick et al. Jan 1990 A
5086501 DeLuca et al. Feb 1992 A
5103110 Housworth et al. Apr 1992 A
5167024 Smith et al. Nov 1992 A
5201059 Nguyen Apr 1993 A
5204863 Saint-Joigny et al. Apr 1993 A
5218704 Watts, Jr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5230055 Katz et al. Jul 1993 A
5239652 Seibert et al. Aug 1993 A
5410278 Itoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5422591 Rastegar et al. Jun 1995 A
5422806 Chen et al. Jun 1995 A
5440520 Schutz et al. Aug 1995 A
5461266 Koreeda et al. Oct 1995 A
5502838 Kikinis Mar 1996 A
5511203 Wisor et al. Apr 1996 A
5513152 Cabaniss Apr 1996 A
5519309 Smith May 1996 A
5560020 Nakatani et al. Sep 1996 A
5568103 Nakashima et al. Oct 1996 A
5592173 Lau et al. Jan 1997 A
5594360 Wojciechowski Jan 1997 A
5610533 Arimoto et al. Mar 1997 A
5680359 Jeong Oct 1997 A
5682093 Kivela Oct 1997 A
5692204 Rawson et al. Nov 1997 A
5717319 Jokinen Feb 1998 A
5719800 Mittal et al. Feb 1998 A
5727208 Brown Mar 1998 A
5745375 Reinhardt et al. Apr 1998 A
5752011 Thomas et al. May 1998 A
5754869 Holzhammer et al. May 1998 A
5757171 Babcock May 1998 A
5764110 Ishibashi Jun 1998 A
5778237 Yamamoto et al. Jul 1998 A
5796313 Eitan Aug 1998 A
5812860 Horden et al. Sep 1998 A
5815724 Mates Sep 1998 A
5815725 Feierbach Sep 1998 A
5825674 Jackson Oct 1998 A
5848281 Smalley et al. Dec 1998 A
5880620 Gitlin et al. Mar 1999 A
5884049 Atkinson Mar 1999 A
5894577 MacDonald et al. Apr 1999 A
5923545 Nguyen Jul 1999 A
5933649 Lim et al. Aug 1999 A
5940785 Georgiou et al. Aug 1999 A
5940786 Steeby Aug 1999 A
5973526 Dabral Oct 1999 A
5974557 Thomas Oct 1999 A
5977763 Loughmiller et al. Nov 1999 A
5996083 Gupta et al. Nov 1999 A
5996084 Watts Nov 1999 A
6011403 Gillette Jan 2000 A
6035407 Gebara et al. Mar 2000 A
6047248 Georgiou et al. Apr 2000 A
6048746 Burr Apr 2000 A
6055655 Momohara Apr 2000 A
6078319 Bril et al. Jun 2000 A
6087892 Burr Jul 2000 A
6091283 Murgula et al. Jul 2000 A
6091300 Setty et al. Jul 2000 A
6097242 Forbes et al. Aug 2000 A
6118306 Orton et al. Sep 2000 A
6119241 Michail et al. Sep 2000 A
6141762 Nicol et al. Oct 2000 A
6172943 Yuzuki Jan 2001 B1
6202104 Ober Mar 2001 B1
6216235 Thomas et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218708 Burr Apr 2001 B1
6218892 Soumyanath et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218895 De et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229747 Cho et al. May 2001 B1
6232793 Arimoto et al. May 2001 B1
6232827 De et al. May 2001 B1
6242936 Ho et al. Jun 2001 B1
6272642 Pole, II et al. Aug 2001 B2
6279048 Fadavi-Ardekani et al. Aug 2001 B1
6303444 Burr Oct 2001 B1
6304824 Bausch et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311287 Dischler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314522 Chu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6341087 Kunikiyo Jan 2002 B1
6345363 Levy-Kendler Feb 2002 B1
6347379 Dai et al. Feb 2002 B1
6378081 Hammond Apr 2002 B1
6388432 Uchida May 2002 B2
6392467 Oowaki et al. May 2002 B1
6407571 Furuya et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411156 Borkar et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415388 Browning et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422746 Weiss et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425086 Clark et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426641 Koch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6427211 Watts, Jr. Jul 2002 B2
6442746 James et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456157 Forbes et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457134 Lemke et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457135 Cooper Sep 2002 B1
6466077 Miyazaki et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476632 La Rosa et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477654 Dean et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484265 Borkar et al. Nov 2002 B2
6487668 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 B2
6489224 Burr Dec 2002 B1
6489796 Tomishima Dec 2002 B2
6510400 Moriyama Jan 2003 B1
6510525 Nookala et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513124 Furuichi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518826 Zhang Feb 2003 B2
6519706 Ogoro Feb 2003 B1
6574739 Kung et al. Jun 2003 B1
6614301 Casper et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621325 Hart et al. Sep 2003 B2
6653890 Ono et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657504 Deal et al. Dec 2003 B1
6731157 Fulkerson May 2004 B2
6777978 Hart et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784722 Tang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6792379 Ando Sep 2004 B2
6794630 Keshavarzi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6812758 Gauthier et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815971 Wang et al. Nov 2004 B2
6847252 Ono et al. Jan 2005 B1
6858897 Chen Feb 2005 B2
6885210 Suzuki Apr 2005 B1
6912155 Sakurai et al. Jun 2005 B2
7112978 Koniaris et al. Sep 2006 B1
7129745 Lewis et al. Oct 2006 B2
7180322 Koniaris et al. Feb 2007 B1
7263457 White et al. Aug 2007 B2
7334198 Ditzel et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336090 Koniaris et al. Feb 2008 B1
7336092 Koniaris et al. Feb 2008 B1
7348827 Rahim et al. Mar 2008 B2
7363176 Patel et al. Apr 2008 B2
7502565 Moran Mar 2009 B2
7626409 Koniaris et al. Dec 2009 B1
7671621 Koniaris et al. Mar 2010 B2
20020002689 Yeh Jan 2002 A1
20020026597 Dai et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029352 Borkar et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032829 Dalrymple Mar 2002 A1
20020073348 Tani Jun 2002 A1
20020083356 Dai Jun 2002 A1
20020087896 Cline et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116650 Halepete et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138778 Cole et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020178390 Lee Nov 2002 A1
20020194509 Plante et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030036876 Fuller et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065960 Rusu et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074591 McClendon et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030189465 Abadeer et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040025061 Lawrence Feb 2004 A1
20040073821 Naveh et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040123170 Tschanz et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128631 Ditzel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20060074576 Patel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070229054 Dobberpuhl et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070296440 Takamiya et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080143372 Koniaris et al. Jun 2008 A1
20100077233 Koniaris et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100097092 Koniaris et al. Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
0381021 Aug 1990 EP
0501655 Feb 1992 EP
0474963 Mar 1992 EP
0978781 Sep 2000 EP
1398639 Dec 2003 EP
409185589 Jul 1997 JP
0127728 Apr 2001 WO
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10334918 Dec 2002 US
Child 11238446 US