The present disclosure relates generally to balanced armature (BA) receivers and more particularly to nickel-iron (Ni—Fe) alloy armature having improved robustness and performance for BA receivers, as well as to BA motors and BA receivers comprising such Ni—Fe alloy armatures.
BA receivers (also referred to herein as “receivers”) capable of producing an acoustic output signal in response to an electrical audio signal are commonly used in hearing aids, wired and wireless earphones, True Wireless Stereo (TWS) devices, among other hearing devices. BA receivers generally comprise a housing in the form of a cup and cover enclosing a diaphragm that separates an interior of the housing into a back volume and a front volume. An electromagnetic motor located in the back volume includes an electrical coil disposed about an armature (also referred to herein as a “reed”) having a free end portion movably disposed between permanent magnets retained by a yoke. A drive rod or other link mechanically connects the movable portion of the reed to a movable portion of the diaphragm known as a paddle. The reed vibrates between the magnets in response to an electrical signal (representing sound) applied to the coil; otherwise, the reed is balanced between the magnets. The moving diaphragm expels sound out of a sound port of the housing via the front volume.
The motor and particularly the reed and yoke of known balanced armature receivers comprise ASTM A753-2 Type 2 (UNS K94840) nickel-iron (Ni—Fe) alloy having a nickel content between 47% and 49% by weight. Type 2 Ni—Fe alloy is desired for its characteristically low coercivity, low core loss, low distortion and high magnetic permeability. ASTM A753-02 Type 1 (UNS K94490) Ni—Fe alloy has a lower nickel content than Type 2 Ni—Fe alloy. Type 1 Ni—Fe alloy has not been used for armatures due to its low magnetic permeability and high coercivity compared to Type 2 Ni—Fe alloy. However Type 2 Ni—Fe alloy is relatively inelastic and susceptible to plastic deformation, which can result from an impact or other shock imparted to the receiver. A bent or otherwise deformed reed adversely affects the acoustical performance of the receiver. Thus there is a desire to provide BA receivers, and motors and armatures for such receivers that are more robust.
The objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description and the appended claims considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The drawings depict only representative embodiments and are therefore not considered to limit the scope of the disclosure.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and therefore may not be drawn to scale and may not include well-known features, that the order of occurrence of actions or steps may be different than the order described or be performed concurrently unless specified otherwise, and that the terms and expressions used herein have the meaning understood by those of ordinary skill in the art except where different meanings are attributed to them herein.
The disclosure relates generally to balanced armature receivers and more particularly to armatures comprising nickel-iron (Ni—Fe) alloy compositions having improved robustness and performance for BA receivers. The disclosure also related to receiver motors and receivers comprising such armatures. BA receivers are commonly used in hearing aids, wired and wireless earphones, True Wireless Stereo (TWS) devices, among other hearing devices that are susceptible to shock when handling or dropped.
A balanced armature receiver generally comprises a housing having a sound port between an interior and exterior thereof, and a diaphragm disposed in the housing and separating the interior thereof into a front volume and a back volume. A motor disposed at least partially within the housing comprises a coil located proximate an armature having a free-end portion balanced between permanent magnets retained by a yoke. The free-end portion of the armature is connected to a movable portion of the diaphragm and vibrates between the magnets in response to an audio signal applied to the coil, whereby the moving diaphragm emits sound from the sound port. A representative balanced armature receiver is described in greater detail below.
The Ni—Fe alloy armatures described herein can take many forms. Most all of these armatures generally comprise a planar member having a longitudinal dimension, a width dimension transverse to the longitudinal dimension, and a thickness dimension less than the width dimension. An end portion of the planar member is positionable between magnets retained by a yoke when the armature is connected to the yoke. In one implementation, shown in
According to one aspect of the disclosure, generally, the armature is a nickel-iron (Ni—Fe) alloy comprising a nickel content of 45% or less by weight, 5% or less additives and impurities by weight, and the balance Fe. This representative Ni—Fe alloy armature has a modulus of elasticity not greater than 120 gigapascals (GPa), a density of less than 8.20 g/cm{circumflex over ( )}3, and a yield strain, after annealing, of 0.001 or greater.
The mechanism of elastic deformation in a reed is dominating by bending, which includes tensile, compressive, and shear stresses and strains. As such, the effective modulus seen in bending, also called the flexural modulus, may differ slightly from the more commonly measured tensile modulus. For the purposes of this disclosure, the terms bending modulus, flexural modulus, Young's modulus, effective elastic modulus, elastic modulus, and modulus of elasticity are all understood to mean the material property that dictates the stress-strain relationship of the reed in operation and during shock events. Similarly, for the purposes of this disclosure, the term yield strain is used interchangeably to refer to the strain seen in tension, compression, bending, or combined modes of deflecting the reed.
In a more particular implementation, the armature is a Ni—Fe alloy comprising a nickel content between 36.5% and 45% by weight, 5% or less additives and impurities by weight and the balance Fe. In this implementation, the Ni—Fe alloy armature has a modulus of elasticity between 80 GPa and 120 GPa, a density between 8.1 g/cm{circumflex over ( )}3 and 8.20 g/cm{circumflex over ( )}3, and a yield strain, after annealing, between 0.001 and 0.004.
In another more particular implementation, the armature is a Ni—Fe alloy comprising a nickel content between 38.5% and 41.5%, 2% or less additives and impurities by weight, and the balance Fe. In this implementation, the Ni—Fe alloy armature has a modulus of elasticity between 80 GPa and 100 GPa, a density between 8.10 g/cm{circumflex over ( )}3 and 8.15 g/cm{circumflex over ( )}3, and a yield strain, after annealing, between 0.002 and 0.003.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, the Ni—Fe alloy armature comprising a nickel content of 45% or less by weight is subject to an annealing operation after formation of the armature. Ni—Fe alloy material as delivered from a steel mill tends to have small grains before annealing.
In
In some receiver implementations, the armature and yoke both comprise the same Ni—Fe composition, namely a nickel content of 45% or less by weight as described herein. In other receiver implementations, however, a Ni—Fe alloy yoke comprises a different nickel content than the Ni—Fe alloy armature described in the embodiments disclosed herein. The yoke does not require enhanced strain characteristics to survive a shock as it is physically well constrained by magnets, reed welding and case. The yoke only requires optimized for magnetic properties. Type 2 Ni—Fe alloys provide the best magnetic properties for the yoke. The reed must balance magnetic properties with elastic modulus and resistance to damage when larger strains occur during shock events. In one particular implementation, the armature is a Ni—Fe alloy comprising a nickel content of 45% or less by weight and the yoke is a Ni—Fe alloy comprising a nickel content between 46% and 51% by weight. For example, the yoke can be a Type 2 Ni—Fe alloy comprising a nickel content between 47% to 49% by weight.
While the disclosure and what is presently considered to be the best mode thereof has been described in a manner establishing possession and enabling those of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the same, it will be understood and appreciated that there are many equivalents to the representative embodiments described herein and that myriad modifications and variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, which is to be limited not by the embodiments described but by the appended claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1871739 | Ringel | Aug 1932 | A |
| 2143097 | Warneke | Jan 1939 | A |
| 2994016 | Tibbetts et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
| 3111563 | Carlson | Nov 1963 | A |
| 3163723 | Tibbetts | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3172022 | Tibbetts | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3177412 | Carlson | Apr 1965 | A |
| 3182384 | Carlson et al. | May 1965 | A |
| 3347991 | Carlson | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3432622 | Sebesta et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3531745 | Tibbetts | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3588383 | Carlson et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3617653 | Tibbetts et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3935398 | Carlson et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 4272654 | Carlson | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4410769 | Tibbetts | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4425482 | Bordelon | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4473722 | Wilton | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4518831 | Stanley et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 5101435 | Carlson | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5222050 | Marren et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5610989 | Salvage et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5647013 | Salvage et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5690093 | Schrank et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5708721 | Salvage et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 6041131 | Kirchhoefer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6075870 | Geschiere et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6654477 | Miller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658134 | van Hal et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6757403 | Urushibata et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 7050602 | Miller | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7103196 | Warren | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7164776 | Miller et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7203334 | Schafer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7236609 | Tsangaris et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7321664 | Van Banning et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7336797 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7362878 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366317 | Miller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7415125 | Warren et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7443997 | Miller et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7817815 | Miller | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7860264 | Jiles et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7921540 | Jiles et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7925041 | Jiles et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7995789 | Tsangaris et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8027492 | Miller | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8233646 | Lutz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8494209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8824726 | Miller et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8837755 | Jiles et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9137605 | Manley et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9137610 | Jiles et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 10945077 | Scheleski et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 20020003890 | Warren et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20060140436 | de Moel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060239488 | Geschiere et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070036378 | Saltykov et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20090147983 | Jiles | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100054509 | Thompson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284561 | Miller | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20120008814 | Alwicker et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120286865 | Chandrasekaran | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130279732 | Sanecki et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140369548 | Manley et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150036831 | Klippel | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150086049 | Jiles | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150110338 | McCratic et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150201293 | Sanecki et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150249889 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150373456 | Dayton et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160227328 | Van Halteren et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20180367916 | Tjepkema | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190007768 | Kim | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190069091 | Bruins | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190306610 | Kim | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190320272 | Jones | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20200154212 | Mbahri et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1452545 | Oct 2003 | CN |
| 103364909 | Oct 2013 | CN |
| 203840067 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 203840177 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 203840179 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 203840180 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 203872027 | Oct 2014 | CN |
| 203933199 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 203951282 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 203951286 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 204046390 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 204046391 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 204118999 | Jan 2015 | CN |
| 204119001 | Jan 2015 | CN |
| 204168459 | Feb 2015 | CN |
| 204291354 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 204350281 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204350282 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204350283 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204350284 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204350285 | May 2015 | CN |
| 204350286 | May 2015 | CN |
| 105050010 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 205584474 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 205595924 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 205595999 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 205596313 | Sep 2016 | CN |
| 107135449 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107222818 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 107240976 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107240989 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 107241674 | Oct 2017 | CN |
| 203951601 | Nov 2017 | CN |
| 206775740 | Dec 2017 | CN |
| 206879090 | Jan 2018 | CN |
| 207354540 | May 2018 | CN |
| 0993759 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 0784415 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1247427 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 551182 | Mar 1923 | FR |
| 564941 | Oct 1923 | FR |
| 859830 | Jan 1961 | GB |
| 2007074499 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| 4876293 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2015057519 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2016058637 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Patent Office; International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2018/041921; dated Feb. 15, 2019. |