Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to printers. More particularly, the present invention relates to ink jet printers.
2. General Background of the Invention
High quality ink jet printing is usually done in one direction (unidirectional) and in multiple passes to hide repetitive defects in dot placement. For each firing of an ink jet nozzle there may be more than one drop, a main drop and one or more accompanying satellite droplets. These satellite droplets are generally smaller than the main drop and are at varying distance and direction from the main drop.
Prior art has attempted to reduce or eliminate satellite drops with varying degrees of success. This is usually done by controlling the drive signal to the resistive heater element or piezo-electric element. There is also some prior art for edge-feed thermal ink jet to compensate for topography of the nozzle plate near the edge of the silicon substrate. This prior art typically does not mention controlling satellites, but is concerned with the main drop misdirection.
One of ordinary skill in this art should be able to find details of the invention not specifically disclosed herein in, for example, patents and other references and prior art products mentioned herein.
The following patents are believed to be related to the first embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
4,282,533; 5,406,318; 5,867,189; 6,126,282; 6,247,794; 6,264,850; 6,293,644; 6,299,281; 6,336,710; 6,491,833; 6,505,912; 6,527,354.
The following patent documents are believed to be related to the second embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
The following patent documents are believed to be related to the third embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
The following patent documents are believed to be related to the fourth embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
The following patent documents are believed to be related to the fifth embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
The following patent documents are believed to be related to the sixth embodiment of the present invention: U.S. Patent Document Nos.:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,049,899 and 6,474,763 are also believed to be of interest.
The apparatus of the present invention comprises an inkjet printer, a system for printing, and a method of printing using an inkjet printhead having specially shaped and/or directed nozzle bores to control the distribution of main and/or satellite ink drops.
The method of printing of the present invention includes intentional directional shifting of satellites for uniform density control.
The apparatus of the present invention includes a printhead for an inkjet printer, the printhead comprising an ink reservoir and nozzles for ejecting ink from the ink reservoir onto print media, the nozzles being formed in the ink jet printer printhead in a predetermined fashion with bores purposefully shaped and/or directed to determine the formation and placement of satellite droplets when ink is ejected from the ink reservoir when the printhead is part of an inkjet printer.
In some embodiments: (a) each of the nozzles produces a main drop and a satellite droplet when ink is ejected through the nozzles, (b) each nozzle includes a bore, (c) the bore of each nozzle is shaped such that, when ink is ejected through the nozzles, satellite droplets and main drops are balanced—the combined area of satellite droplet and main drop in a first printing direction is as nearly equal as possible to the combined area of the satellite droplet and main drop in a second printing direction opposite to the first printing direction; this can be achieved, for example, by forming the bores as truncated vertical cones, with each bore including two concentric circles, a larger one at the top, a smaller one at the bottom with the two concentric circles connected by a conical section, and the vertical axis through the conical section being substantially normal to the surface of the nozzle plate; (d) the printhead is used in a printer which prints in two directions, and (e) when ink is ejected through the nozzles, satellite droplets and main drops are balanced—the combined area of satellite droplet and main drop in a first printing direction is as nearly equal as possible to the combined area of the satellite droplet and main drop in a second printing direction opposite to the first printing direction; when ink is ejected through the nozzles, satellite droplets ejected through the nozzles can at least partially overlap the main drops in each direction of printing.
In some embodiments:
In some embodiments:
In some embodiments:
In some embodiments the inkjet printer includes means for printing in a single lateral direction so that the main drop and satellite droplet at least partially overlap.
In some embodiments the bores are aligned so that the main drop and satellite droplet ejected from substantially all of the nozzles at least partially overlap when the printer prints.
In some embodiments:
In some embodiments:
in a first direction of printing, the main drop from the first nozzle associated with a heater at least partially overlaps the satellite droplet from that nozzle and at least partially overlaps the satellite droplet from the second nozzle associated with that heater, and
in a second direction of printing, the main drop from the second nozzle associated with a heater at least partially overlaps the satellite droplet from that nozzle and at least partially overlaps the satellite droplet from the first nozzle associated with that heater.
The nozzle bores can for example be oriented such that they eject ink opposite the direction of travel of the print head when the print head is moving and printing.
The present invention includes an inkjet print head comprising the inkjet print head chip, and an ink jet printer comprising the inkjet print head.
The nozzle bores can for example be formed in polyimide film; the nozzle bores can for example be cut with an eximer laser.
The present invention includes a method of controlling the formation and placement of satellite droplets ejected from an ink jet printer printhead comprising the steps of:
providing an ink jet printer printhead having an ink reservoir; forming nozzles in the ink jet printer printhead; installing the printhead in an ink jet printer; ejecting ink from the reservoir through the nozzles in the form of main drops and satellite droplets in a manner to achieve uniform density control by controlling the formation and placement of satellite droplets when ink is ejected from the reservoir of the ink jet printer printhead when the printhead is part of an inkjet printer. The method of the present invention can advantageously use the apparatus of the present invention.
For a further understanding of the nature, objects, and advantages of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description, read in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and wherein:
Balanced Satellite Distributions
In the first embodiment of the present invention the nozzle openings are formed with a balanced bore (see
It is the distance and direction of the satellite droplet from the main drop that the first embodiment of the present invention proposes to control. By controlling this distance and direction one can reduce the repetitive differences between printing right-to-left and printing left-to-right. High quality ink jet printing in two directions (bi-directionally) reduces the printing time by half.
Satellite steering is caused by the bore angle of the nozzle hole with respect to the silicon substrate surface (see
A bore angled to the left causes satellite predominance in the R2L direction (see
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain a balanced satellite pattern.
Balanced satellite distributions R2L and L2R create print swaths of uniform color and density (see
Alternating High Frequency Satellite Direction
In the second embodiment of the present invention the nozzle openings are formed with all bores in one pair of rows facing to the left, then all bores in the next pair of rows facing to the right, to cause the printing pattern in one direction (e.g, left to right) to be a vertically offset mirror image of the printing pattern in the other direction (i.e, the satellite ink drops are spaced from the main drops in one pair of rows in one direction at approximately the same distance as the satellite ink drops are spaced from the main drops in the next pair of rows in the other direction (see FIG. 8)); in
It is the distance and direction of the satellite droplet from the main drop that the second embodiment of the present invention proposes to control. By controlling this distance and direction one can reduce the repetitive differences between printing right-to-left and printing left-to-right.
Here it is the intent to purposefully change the satellite direction at some high frequency in the y-direction (printhead swath width). This means that every pair of nozzles or every (1 . . . n) nozzles, have satellites directed in one print direction only. The next pair of nozzles or set of (1 . . . n) nozzles has satellites directed in the opposite direction.
By directing multiples of satellites in opposite directions, one can achieve the same effect as balancing satellites R2L and L2R. High quality bi-directional printing can be achieved with a 2× increase in speed.
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain the directed satellite pattern.
Directed satellite distributions R2L and L2R create print swaths of uniform color and density. High quality printing in both directions (bi-directional) can be achieved when satellite distributions are directed at some high frequency (1 . . . n)/dpi. This achievement allows doubling the print speed of the printer.
Elimination of Satellites in One Printing Direction
In the third embodiment of the present invention (see
It is the distance and direction of the satellite droplet from the main drop that the third embodiment of the present invention proposes to control. By controlling this distance and direction one can produce printing in a single direction that is free of satellites. This allows very uniform controlled printing in one direction.
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain a predominantly L2R or R2L satellite pattern.
Unidirectional high quality printing can be achieved when satellite distributions are altered using bore angle. This achievement allows excellent control over dot placement and print uniformity.
Steering Main Drops
In the fourth embodiment of the present invention the nozzle openings are formed with all bores in one pair of rows facing to the left, then all bores in the next pair of rows facing to the right, to cause the printing pattern in one direction (e.g, left to right) to be a vertically offset mirror image of the printing pattern in the other direction (i.e, the satellite ink drops are spaced from the main drops in one pair of rows in one direction at approximately the same distance as the satellite ink drops are spaced from the main drops in the next pair of rows in the other direction (very similar to the second embodiment, but in this one the main drops are primarily the ones being directed, while in the second embodiment it is the satellite drops which are primarily the ones being directed).
By controlling the direction of the main drop relative to the desired line of dots one can create a pattern with high frequency or random pattern that will exhibit less defects. This allows very uniform controlled printing in both directions.
Controlling the main drop position relative to the desired in-line firing of nozzles involves offsetting the inkjet nozzle relative to the heater. Change in the main drop position in the x-direction can be accomplished by offsetting the nozzle in the x-direction (see FIGS. 11–14—the reference point was different between the cyan graph (
In addition to nozzle hole offset, a bore angled to the left causes main drop movement to the left (
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain main drop deflection to the right or to the left (see
Here it is the intent to purposefully change the main drop direction at some high frequency in the y-direction (printhead swath width). This means that every pair of nozzles or every (1 . . . n) nozzles are directed say to the right. The next pair of nozzles or set of (1 . . . n) nozzles is directed in the opposite direction.
Using Satellites to Fill Swath and Improve Uniformity
In the fifth embodiment of the present invention the nozzle openings are formed with an upwardly or downwardly directed bore to cause the satellite ink drops to be offset in the y direction so one can increase the space between the main drops and still have full coverage.
By controlling the direction of the satellite droplet relative to the main dot one can use the satellite droplets to fill white space between lines of main drops.
In this embodiment reduced print density variation can for example be achieved by directing the satellites in the vertical axis far enough to be separated from the main dot on the print media. This placement ensures that as the carrier moves in either direction the satellite will fall outside the main dot. The result is a consistent ink print coverage and equal density in either direction. This technique is also of benefit to unidirectional printing. Variation in satellite trajectory within the nozzle array can cause some of the satellites to fall within the main dot area and others to fall outside the main dot area. This results in density bands within the printed swath. By directing the satellites sufficiently vertically, the satellites fall outside the main dot area in spite of these trajectory variations and the density of the swath is more uniform. In this method, all nozzles can for example have the same vertical satellite directing applied; thus, if the main drop is affected by the satellite positioning technique, all drops are affected equally thereby requiring no electrical timing compensation for re-alignment. The same effect can be achieved by either directing nozzles up or directing nozzles down.
A nozzle hole bore angled to the left causes main drop movement to the left. A bore angle to the right causes main drop movement to the right. Likewise a bore angled up causes the satellite droplets to land above the main drop (see
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain satellite droplet deflection up or down to fill in white space between main dots (see
Here it is the intent to purposefully change the satellite droplet location in the y-direction (printhead swath width) and to be able to increase the space between main drop and still have full coverage. Full coverage is achieved by filling in the white space between main drops using satellites deflected above or below the main drop on the printed page. Creating consistent doublets of equal or near equal mass instead of main drop and satellites with differing mass
In the sixth embodiment of the present invention the nozzle openings are formed with two nozzles per heater and the bore angle is controlled to cause two droplets of approximately equal size and mass (see
By controlling the nozzle shape and the direction of the satellite drops relative to the main dot one can create doublets of equal or near equal mass. This allows very uniform controlled printing in both directions. This also allows one to control the effective aspect ratio of the drop, and can be used to increase resolution in one direction. This can be done in either the horizontal (x-direction—
A nozzle hole bore angled to the left causes main drop movement to the left. A bore angle to the right causes main drop movement to the right. Likewise a bore angled up causes the satellite droplets to land above the main drop, just as a bore angled down causes the satellite droplets to land below the main drop. Satellite droplet location with respect to the main drop depends on a number of factors that will be detailed below. Desired tolerance on bore angle for satellite droplet deflection depends on the drop velocity, carrier velocity, and paper gap. Gravity and air turbulence are ignored and have been found to be negligible in practice.
Once the printhead gap and drop velocities are known along with the associated tolerances for each, one can calculate the angular tolerance needed to maintain satellite droplet deflection desired.
Here it is the intent to purposefully change the satellite droplet location in the x-direction or the y-direction to change the aspect ratio of the drops deposited on the print. By doing this one can accommodate different resolution in x and y directions and still maintain high quality bi-directional printing.
Inkjet print head 120 (
Processes for Manufacture of Directed Nozzles
There are several ways to manufacture directed nozzles. An exemplary current process is to use an eximer laser (such as Lambda Physik brand eximer laser, model NovaLine or LPX, commercially available from Lambda Physik) to ablate nozzle hole features in polyimide film. A chrome mask can for example be used to provide the ablation patterns. The nozzle plates can then be die-cut from the film. Other nozzle-plate films could be, for example, polyethersulfone, liquid crystal polymer, polyimide ether, or polyether ether ketone, though polyimide is preferred. These other films can for example be about 10–75 microns thick. A mask other than chrome could be used, such as any material that would block the laser beam and not be degraded by the beam energy). The mask can for example be about 0.5–3.0 millimeters thick.
In order to produce balanced satellites (as in the first embodiment), laser beam perpendicularity at the object surface should be within about 0.5 degrees, more preferably within about 0.3 degrees, and most preferably within about 0.1 degrees from normal to the nozzle plate film. Hole concentricity can be verified by ablation of a material (such as polyethersulfone, liquid crystal polymer, polyimide ether, polyether ether ketone, or polyimide ) that is thicker (typically about 25–125 microns thick) than the normal nozzle plate material.
If the nozzles are to be directed all in one direction (as in the third and fifth embodiments), the laser beam can for example be angled (typically about 1–10 degrees from normal, preferably about 1–5 degrees from normal, and more preferably about 1–3 degrees from normal) by adjusting the laser optics and verifying beam angle by ablation of a material (such as polyethersulfone, liquid crystal polymer, polyimide ether, polyether ether ketone, or polyimide) that is thicker (typically about 25–125 microns thick) than the normal nozzle plate material.
If nozzles are to be directed in multiple directions (as in the second, fourth, and sixth embodiments), the laser beam can for example be adjusted to be normal to the ablated material. An ablation mask can for example be used that has greyscale (uniform small geometric or non geometric shapes that reduce beam transmission, but do not image) to reduce the beam power in a portion of the ablated hole features. Examples of ablation mask material include chrome on glass, where chrome is the patterned material. These masks can for example be drawn with a CAD package, and chrome can for example be the patterned material.
By using a greyscale mask the wall angle of a portion of the circumference of the ablated holes can be varied to produce the desired non-concentric holes for directing the droplets of ink from the printhead. This is done in the following manner: The greyscale mask is designed to reduce the laser beam energy on one side of each nozzle hole gradually outward radially to the edge of the hole. This produces a nozzle hole with more wall taper on one side than the other. The hole concentricity is shifted in the desired direction. The tangent of the angle produced is the difference between the centroid of the laser entrance hole and the centroid of the laser exit hole divided by the thickness of the ablated material.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5378137; 5417897; 5467115; 5948289; 6361145; and 6454393 disclose various methods for making nozzles which could be used to make the nozzles of the present invention.
Parts List:
The following is a list of parts and materials suitable for use in the present invention:
120 inkjet print head of the present invention
130 inkjet printer including print head 120
All measurements disclosed herein are at standard temperature and pressure, at sea level on Earth, unless indicated otherwise.
The foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only; the scope of the present invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3928855 | Helinski et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3979756 | Helinski et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3981019 | Fujimoto et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4048639 | Walsh et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4220958 | Crowley | Sep 1980 | A |
4238804 | Warren | Dec 1980 | A |
4246589 | Denny et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4282533 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4380017 | Ort | Apr 1983 | A |
4384296 | Torpey | May 1983 | A |
4393385 | Jinnai et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4555712 | Arway et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4613875 | Le et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4638337 | Torpey et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4827280 | Stamer et al. | May 1989 | A |
5142296 | Lopez et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5337071 | East et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5396273 | Stamer | Mar 1995 | A |
5406318 | Moore et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422664 | Stephany | Jun 1995 | A |
5461406 | Lorenze, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5594479 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638101 | Keefe et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5859653 | Aoki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867189 | Whitlow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870117 | Moore | Feb 1999 | A |
5896154 | Mitani et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6053598 | Inpyn | Apr 2000 | A |
6079809 | Yaegashi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6126282 | Oikawa | Oct 2000 | A |
6155670 | Weber et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6220693 | Bode et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247794 | Silverbrook | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250739 | Serra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264850 | Silverbrook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276774 | Moghadam | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276783 | Ishinaga et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293644 | Markham et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299270 | Merrill | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299281 | Shiida et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302505 | Askeland et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302506 | Norton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336710 | Silverbrook | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338545 | Sekiya | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6364447 | Boleda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367908 | Serra et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371596 | Maze et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428135 | Lubinsky et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431675 | Chang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435643 | Miura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464330 | Miller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474763 | Murakami et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491377 | Cleland et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491833 | Silverbrook | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497467 | Suwa et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6505905 | Krouss | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505912 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523926 | Mitsuzawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527354 | Takahashi | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6527376 | Itaya et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530635 | Otsuki | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536869 | Bland et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20020054187 | Kato et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030025749 | Krouss | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030179258 | Freire et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
58217372 | Dec 1983 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050083373 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |