Related application U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/853,626, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,073,835, was filed on May 24, 2004, describing an improved bale wagon.
The present invention relates to bale wagons, and more particularly to the improved design of rolling rack tines for the wagons.
In the past, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of bale wagons. Note for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 418,091; 2,848,127; 3,065,866; 3,430,783; 3,436,903; 3,620,384; 3,662,900; 3,974,926; 4,095,701; 4,119,218; 5,501,562; 5,547,334; and 6,247,885. However, little attention has been devoted to improving the characteristics of the unloaded stacks of bales themselves. Consequently, the stackability of baled crops, depends less upon the nature of the baling machinery than upon the inherent nature of the baled crop, i.e. its weight, shape, density, moisture content, etc. For example, tightly gathered, highly dense bales will stack more uniformly than loosely gathered softer bales. Also, even the tightly gathered bales have irregularities which cause inconsistent spacing between individual bales, and in turn leads to individual bales toppling from the stack. Variations in baler settings, feeding speeds, and other factors involving baler mechanisms also limit the height at which the bales can be stacked without falling over. Even the topography of the ground on which the bales are stacked can be detrimental to stackability.
Presently, more uniform, higher stacks and less spillage from toppling is desired. An advancement that would save money and time by enhancing the tidiness of the stacked bales, regardless of the type of crop or topography, but without modifying baler settings, would be welcomed and would satisfy a longfelt need in the industry.
It is therefore a principal aspect of the present invention to provide an improved bale wagon which allows unloading higher stacks of bales with less spillage from toppling.
It is a further aspect of the present invention to provide a new and improved method for stacking bales of crop, when unloading bale wagons.
Generally, bale wagons consist of a first table to pick-up bales, and a second table for transferring the bales onto yet another table, called a load-carrying bed, which is also known as the “load rack”, or “load bed”, or “load table.” Tiers of bales, typically 3 bales wide, can be formed on the transfer table (which is forward of the load-carrying bed) and then the tiers can be successively loaded, as high as 7 to 9 bales high, onto the load-carrying bed. As each tier is loaded, the previously loaded tiers move rearwardly one bale width to provide space for the new tier. A “movable” (as by rolling or sliding action) rack of tines, on the load-carrying bed, having a plurality of vertically extending tines or fingers which are fixed at their lower ends to a crossbar, extends transversely across the load-carrying bed and supports the rear end of the load. As the load accumulates and moves rearwardly, the movement is biased against the force of a spring or hydraulic cylinder, or other mechanism. The tines move toward an inoperable position, at the rear end of the wagon, such as against a cam associated with the transfer table. When unloading, the load-carrying bed is tilted backwards 90° the wagon pulls away, and the load of bales slides onto the ground. At the point of resting in the 90° tilt, and as the wagon pulls away, the entire weight of the tiers of bales falls onto the rolling rack tines (and onto additional reinforcements at the wagons rear-end, such as special “nonmovable” tines). After the bales are unloaded from the load-carrying bed, the tine rack retracts to its forward most position.
Previously, it was thought that the junction point, at which the rollable crossbar of the rolling rack intersects the bottom ends of the tine fingers, should be integrally fixed or casted together as by welding or otherwise. Thus, structural support is assured, against the entire weight and force of the bales, both when moving rearwardly and when tilting toward the 90° unloading position. It is of note that the angle, defined at that junction point between the tine fingers and the crossbar, will directly correlate to the angle at which the stacks of bales are unloaded, and the angle at which the stacks are unloaded will dictate the angle of lean, of the unloaded stacks.
We have surprisingly discovered that a bale wagon, having rolling rack tines that pivot along the crossbar rather than being integrally fixed or casted to the crossbar, can be secure enough and strong enough to accommodate the maximum weight and force of the load, thereby allowing one to selectably stabilize various angles at which unloaded stacks of bales can lean.
In the present invention, the individual tines are pivotally connected to the crossbar so as to allow a stable point at an approximately 90° tine angle relative to the top surface of the load-carrying bed, and may be adjusted to rest at any of several positions, which positions reduce the tine angle by increments of about 1.5° to about 2°. This provides an effective variation of the lean angle to substantially improve the stacking of unloaded bales, without loss of structural support in the rolling rack as the load accumulates and the load-carrying bed tilts backward.
The bale wagons of the present invention are equipped with pivotally adjustable tines. The adjustability may be achieved by either electronic circuitry, hydraulic mechanism, or mechanically or other equivalent systems, but preferably for cost effectiveness and simplicity, the pivotal adjustment of the tines is effected by using brackets, braces, pins, hinges and/or other pivotally adjustable elements. The present invention shall be described in terms of one such preferred embodiment.
Referring to the accompanying drawings, particularly
A partial view of the back tier of bales 20(a) is shown in
Referring again specifically to
It will be understood that changes in the details, materials, steps, and arrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made by those skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within the principles and scope of the invention. The foregoing description illustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however, concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following claims are intended to protect the invention broadly as well as in the specific form shown.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
418091 | Thompson | Dec 1889 | A |
2848127 | Grey | Aug 1958 | A |
3065866 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3430783 | Butler | Mar 1969 | A |
3436903 | Blair | Apr 1969 | A |
3572521 | Grey et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3620384 | Welker | Nov 1971 | A |
3662900 | Grey et al. | May 1972 | A |
3952881 | Knudson | Apr 1976 | A |
3974926 | Kopaska | Aug 1976 | A |
4095701 | Guenon | Jun 1978 | A |
4119218 | Guenon et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4278379 | Grey | Jul 1981 | A |
4282969 | Zipser | Aug 1981 | A |
4289436 | Zipser et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295772 | Zimmerman | Oct 1981 | A |
4305690 | Butler et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4325666 | Chain et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4329101 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4358235 | Butler et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4838753 | Gehman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4971504 | Klompien | Nov 1990 | A |
5168817 | Nulle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5211345 | Siebenga | May 1993 | A |
5333693 | Severeid | Aug 1994 | A |
5333981 | Pronovost et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5501562 | Zimmerman | Mar 1996 | A |
5547334 | Baril | Aug 1996 | A |
6171047 | Vandervalk | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247885 | Smart | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6328520 | Maclay | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6764274 | Maclay | Jul 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050220592 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |