This document concerns an invention relating generally to balance training devices that are well-suited to improving balance, and thus reducing the chances of falls and injuries, as well as to training for such sporting activities as skateboarding, snowboarding, surfing, and wakeboarding.
Various devices exist that attempt to mimic board and ski sports. The most realistic devices are large, expensive simulators that are inaccessible to most enthusiasts. Other smaller devices exist, but they do not succeed in mimicking the feel of a board and do not provide sufficient exercise and training. Two products in this market category are the Bongo Board™ and the Indo Balance Board™. The Bongo Board has a skateboard deck and a tapered central wheel on which one can balance while shifting one's weight side-to-side. The Indo Balance Board is similar to the Bongo Board but this device uses a long cylinder under a deck to roll the deck across. What is needed is a versatile exercise device that allows for balance, strength, and cardiac training through a fuller range of motion.
The invention, which is defined by the claims set forth at the end of this document, is directed to balance, strength, and cardiac training devices that at least partially alleviate the aforementioned problems. A basic understanding of some of the features of preferred versions of the invention can be attained from a review of the following brief summary of the invention, with more details being provided elsewhere in this document. To assist in the reader's understanding, the following review makes reference to the accompanying drawings (which are briefly reviewed in the “Brief Description of the Drawings” section following this Summary section of this document).
Referring initially to
The spherical shape of the ball 600 (which may be a medicine ball) makes it possible for the deck 100 to tip in any direction, unlike other devices that provide instability or movement only laterally. This involves (for example) balance in both the X- and Y-axes. Exercises performed on the exercise device 10 may emphasize movement, not just balance, providing increased cardiac and muscle workouts compared to other devices. Advantageous features of the exercise device 10 include: (1) providing a full range of instability in balance; (2) providing the options of side-to-side and twisting movements; (3) proximity of the deck 100 to the ground (that is, the deck 100 is low to the ground), allowing for faster-paced repetitions that involve alternate contacts of the deck 100 with the floor 30, enhancing cardiac workouts; (4) full body movement, not simply finding one's center of gravity; (5) movements in cycles of push-off, instability, and landing; (6) appropriate cardiac impact in addition to balance training; and (7) muscle strength training in addition to balance training. The exercise device can be beneficial not just to improve balance in athletes, but for all users because improved balance can help reduce the risks of falls and the injuries resulting therefrom.
Further advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the remainder of this document in conjunction with the associated drawings.
Turning initially to
The domed track 400 (or half-tablet) includes a convex side 460 opposing a concave side 470 that forms the track valley 410 that receives at least a portion of the ball 600 therein. The track 400 includes a track width extending laterally from a track first side 440 to a track second side 450, and a track length extending longitudinally from a track first end 420 to a track second end 430. As shown in the figures, the track 400 is elongated, with the track length being greater than the track width. The track 400 also includes a track height extending from a track nadir 480 to a track apex 490, the track height being between approximately a quarter and approximately a half of the resting radius of the ball 600 (that is, the radius of a cross-section of the spherical ball 600 when the ball 600 is not being compressed by, for example, the weight of the user 700). The track 400 is at least substantially centered between the deck first end 110 and the deck second end 120 for symmetry, and may further be substantially centered between the deck first side 170 and the deck second side 180. The ball track 400 in the figures extends upwardly from the deck 100, placing the user's feet 710, 720 closer to the floor 30 for a lower step-on height and facilitating easy touch down at the end of an exercise cycle.
The hardness of the ball 600 may be varied to adjust the parameters of a workout. For example, if the ball 600 is inflatable, relatively higher pressure (such as 10 psi) may be well-suited to quicker movements for increased cardio impact, and relatively lower pressure (such as 5 psi) may provide more resistance and enhanced strength training. If the ball 600 is solid, the exercise device 10 could include two or more interchangeable balls 600 of differing hardness to replicate the effects of inflating or deflating a ball 600. The walls of ball 600 may be thick enough that its structure allows the ball 600 to hold its shape, but the ball 600 may nonetheless include a valve that allows for changes in pressure and/or hardness. For example, a relatively lighter 3 kg ball may be made harder by adding some pressure (for example, 5 psi). It is noted that a standard medicine ball may begin to deform at about 10 psi or higher.
To use the exercise device 10, a user 700 may place the ball 600 on the floor 30, and position the exercise device 10 over the ball 600 with the concave side 470 of the track 400 facing down. The user 700 may then stand with a first foot 710 and a second foot 720 on the first and second foot supports 130, 140, respectively. The ball 600 fits into the domed track 400 and rolls against the concave side 470 of the track 400 as the user 700 balances to keep the first foot 710 and the second foot 720 from touching the floor 30. The deck 100 can move three-dimensionally as the ball 600 rolls on the floor 30.
In one side-to-side exercise that can be performed with the exercise device 10 (see, e.g.,
In another exercise (see, e.g.,
Preferred versions of the invention have been reviewed in the foregoing discussion to illustrate different possible features of the invention and the varying ways in which these features may be combined. Apart from combining the different features of the foregoing versions in varying ways, other modifications are also considered to be within the scope of the invention. Following is an exemplary list of such modifications.
Initially, it must be kept in mind that the exercise device 10 shown in the accompanying drawings and discussed above are merely exemplary, and may assume a wide variety of configurations different from those noted, and may use components different from those noted.
It should also be understood that various terms referring to orientation and position are used throughout this document—for example, “lower” (as in “deck lower surface”)—are relative terms rather than absolute ones. Thus, such terms should be regarded as words of convenience, rather than limiting terms. In other words, it should be understood (for example) that relative positions of components may vary depending on the overall orientation of the device and on the application in which they are used.
Also in the following description, it is to be understood that such terms as “forward,” “rearward,” “left,” “right,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” and the like are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms.
Various preferred versions of the invention are shown and described above to illustrate different possible features of the invention and the varying ways in which these features may be combined. Apart from combining the different features of the foregoing versions in varying ways, other modifications are also considered to be within the scope of the invention. Following is an exemplary list of such modifications.
First, although the first and second foot supports 130, 140 in the figures are shown to be substantially coplanar, the foot supports may instead have any other suitable three-dimensional shape. For example, the foot supports may curve upwards to restrict the foot from longitudinally slipping off the exercise device 10, or have valleys for receiving a user's feet.
Second, although the track 400 and deck 100 are shown in the figures to be elongated, with the first and second foot supports 130, 140 having greater surface area than the first and second sidebars 190, 200 of the deck 100, the deck 100 and track 400 may have other configurations as well. For example, the track 400 may have a more circular cross-section to allow for exercises that involve rolling the ball 600 such that the exercise device 10 traces circular patterns on the floor 30. The sidebars may also be wide enough to allow users 700 to position their feet 710, 720 thereon.
Third, in the version shown in the figures, the deck 100 is balanced and rolled on a ball 600 in a ball track 400. In alternative versions, different means for balancing the deck 100 on a ball 600 may be used. For example, the deck 100 could include a pair of rails that rest on the ball 600 to provide the same multidimensional instability and capacity for side-to-side motion.
Fourth, although the deck 100 is shown as a single continuous surface surrounding the ball track 400, other configurations may be utilized. For example, the deck 100 may comprise two surfaces at opposite ends of the deck underlying all or part of the foot supports 130, 140. Additionally, the shape of the deck 100 and track 400 may vary considerably for practical and/or aesthetic reasons.
The invention is not intended to be limited to the preferred versions of the invention described above, but rather is intended to be limited only by the claims set out below. Thus, the invention encompasses all different versions that fall literally or equivalently within the scope of these claims.
This application claims priority under 35 USC §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/676,997 filed Jul. 29, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
478166 | Madsen | Jul 1892 | A |
1565484 | McWhirter | Dec 1925 | A |
1585748 | Wendelken | May 1926 | A |
1712703 | Hudson | May 1929 | A |
2714007 | Jordan | Jun 1955 | A |
2829892 | Ludwig | Nov 1955 | A |
2764411 | Washburn, Jr. | Sep 1956 | A |
2803461 | Coplin | Aug 1957 | A |
2829891 | Ludwig | Apr 1958 | A |
2906532 | Echols | Sep 1959 | A |
3024021 | Coplin et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3306626 | Kawada | Feb 1967 | A |
3604726 | Tracy | Sep 1971 | A |
3612519 | Larson | Oct 1971 | A |
3862768 | England | Jan 1975 | A |
3895794 | England | Jul 1975 | A |
4191371 | Armer, Jr. | Mar 1980 | A |
4505477 | Wilkinson | Mar 1985 | A |
4601469 | Sasser, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4787630 | Watson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4817950 | Goo | Apr 1989 | A |
4826159 | Hersey | May 1989 | A |
4911440 | Hyman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5582567 | Chang | Dec 1996 | A |
6019712 | Duncan | Feb 2000 | A |
6146343 | Stewart | Nov 2000 | A |
6436019 | Hollowell | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461285 | Theunissen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6551225 | Romero | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6676150 | Goldstein | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676579 | Lin | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6705977 | Ziak | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719676 | Hsu | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6872175 | Lin | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6916276 | Robinson | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6945920 | Kemery et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7070415 | Hojo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081075 | Sachs | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083178 | Potter | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086996 | Matjacic et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097597 | Tamian | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112168 | Dalebout et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131934 | Dadbeh | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7134990 | Wischusen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147591 | McAvoy | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7264580 | Lu | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288055 | Blaum | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7300392 | Curran | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7357767 | Tsai | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7424927 | Hiramatsu | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7467681 | Hiramatsu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475442 | Dierking et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7479097 | Rosborough et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488177 | Pearson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7566291 | Lickle | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608017 | Nakanishi | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7670265 | Forrest et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7686396 | Schaaf | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7775939 | Nakanishi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775952 | Curran et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7782358 | Nieminen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7881217 | El-Damhougy et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887425 | Nakanishi | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7918774 | Dye | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942797 | Canton et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8033968 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8062199 | Smith | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075449 | Lee | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105250 | Wu | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8206275 | Chang | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8269826 | Nieminen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8300195 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8360943 | Smith | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8435164 | VanBuren | May 2013 | B2 |
8888669 | Dunegan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9084909 | Henley | Jul 2015 | B1 |
20030045410 | Kao | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045411 | Lin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040014571 | Haynes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040087421 | Lin | May 2004 | A1 |
20040198573 | Brydson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050170939 | Lin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060073938 | German et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082089 | Rejtano | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060217242 | Karpachev | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229159 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060270536 | Tukada | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070027009 | Arnold | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070207900 | Huang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254789 | Odien | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270296 | Caldicott | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298947 | Eksteen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080020856 | Rosa | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080020900 | Wang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039304 | Mattox | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064578 | Huang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080176715 | Dick | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228110 | Berme | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234117 | Clark et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242515 | Odien | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287263 | Cheng | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312043 | Cook | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011393 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090176635 | Brinson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186746 | Pandolfo | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192416 | Ernst et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090303179 | Overholt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318274 | Welsh | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100197465 | Stevenson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210978 | Oddsson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110039669 | Stewart et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110105286 | Dye | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111934 | Taylor et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143896 | Senegal | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160024 | Candela et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110212810 | Jeka et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218077 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263398 | Klassen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281702 | Tudico | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120018969 | Cho | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120065040 | Smith | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120115691 | Munroe | May 2012 | A1 |
20120208684 | Huang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238421 | Klopman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252645 | Agostini | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120258841 | James | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120264579 | Klein et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289866 | Irby et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309598 | Brentham et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329619 | Goldberg | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053228 | Winegar | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130150220 | Chen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61676997 | Jul 2012 | US |