1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an inflatable ball, in particular a soccer ball, having a shell comprising a plurality of panels.
2. Background Art
Soccer balls, as well as other inflatable balls, are typically produced as follows. In a first step an inner bladder, which can be made from latex, is reinforced with a carcass, or by a nylon thread wound around the bladder. An outer shell is then arranged on the carcass or on the nylon winding.
For simple balls the shell can be integrally formed of plastic material, or two preformed half shells of the ball shell are connected to each other, for example by gluing or sealing, as it is disclosed in FIG. 5 of the U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0011878. The present invention is related to higher quality balls. The shell of high quality balls is composed of a multitude of prefabricated panels. To clearly distinguish these two fundamentally different constructions of a ball shell (i.e., a shell formed from two half shells and a shell formed from a multitude of prefabricated panels), in the following the term panel is taken to mean a separately prefabricated portion which forms less than a half of the ball shell.
The panels must be suitably attached relative to each other, for example by sewing the edges of the panels together or also by gluing the panels to the surface of the carcass. A direct gluing or (laser) welding of the edges of the panels to each other is also conceivable. For the sake of simplicity, the region in which two adjacent panels contact each ether, is simply called a “seam” in the following description, regardless of whether the panels are actually sewn to each other in a standard manner or whether they are fixed relative to each other in any other way in order to provide the outer shell of the ball.
In the past, the shell of soccer balls typically consisted of 32 pentagonal and/or hexagonal panels. However, more recent ball designs have a lower number of larger-sized panels. The new designs improve the ball control by the player, since each seam creates an inhomogenity, typically a localized stiffness, in the outer shell so that the ball reacts differently when kicked with a shoe in the centre of a panel than when being kicked in the seam area. Unavoidable production tolerances during the manufacture of the seam result in an oven greater inhomogeneity and are another reason why the player cannot perfectly control the ball and that a shot ball does not follow a precise flight path. Furthermore, the arrangement of many seams leads to deviations from perfect sphericity.
Using larger panels reduces these problems, since less seams are needed for the manufacture of the overall shell of a ball having the same size. In addition, the manufacturing costs are reduced for larger panels, since less effort is needed to interconnect the panels and/or to arrange them on the carcass. Also the production tolerances are lower since there are less possibilities to create faulty seams during production. This applies for the frequency of occurrence as well as for the extent of such production tolerances.
However, balls having large panels can have negative flight properties and can, for example, tend to have instability. As a result of aerodynamic effects, there can be unintended and unpredictable flutter movements of the ball. It is immediately apparent that these aerodynamic effects substantially impair a controlled play and precise shots. Similar problems also occur for inflatable balls for others sports, such as handball and volleyball.
For improving the aerodynamic properties, it is known from the U.S. Pat. No. 4,318,544 to provide a soccer ball with seven parallel grooves extending in a uniform pentagonal arrangement over the complete shell of the ball. The arrangement is such that there are no grooves on certain panels of the shell of the ball, whereas up to three groups of seven parallel grooves contact each other on other panels.
While this arrangement may improve the flight properties of the ball, it does not improve precision during play. The extremely different surface design of the panels leads to a very different behavior of the ball when contacting a shoe of a player. Both, during dribbling, but also for an aimed shot, the ball will behave differently depending on whether the shoe of the player hits a panel provided with the seven parallel grooves or a standard panel without any ridges.
Embodiments of the present invention are, therefore, based on the problem to provide a ball, in particular a soccer ball, having good properties both, when contacting the shoe of the player but also in the air, and therefore allows more precise play.
In one embodiment, the ball may comprise an outer shell having a plurality of panels, wherein the panels are interconnected by seams. Each panel may comprise at least one pseudo-seam, which extends at least over a part of an outer surface of the panel.
As a result of the pseudo-seams of the invention and their distribution on each panel, the panels of the ball of the invention can be made larger so that the number and the lengths of the seams of the outer shell are reduced. In contrast to real seams, the pseudo-seams have no practical influence on the deformation properties and the contact properties of the panels. However, they have approximately the same aerodynamic effect as real seams and thereby avoid the unintended flutter movements in the flight path. This applies in particular, if the pseudo-seams have a cross section corresponding essentially to the cross section of a seam between two panels, for example an essentially V- or U-shaped cross section having a width in a range from about 1 mm to about 3 mm, for example about 2 mm, and a depth in a range from about 0.5 mm to about 2 mm, for example about 1 mm.
The term “substantially” means in this context, as well as generally within the present description, an accuracy within the limits of production tolerances.
In contrast to the prior art according to the above explained U.S. Pat. No. 4,318,544, each panel may comprise at least one pseudo-seam so that the effect on the aerodynamic properties is evenly distributed over all panels and thereby the complete outer shell. This may lead to improved flight properties. Also the local modification of the deformation properties and the contact properties by the pseudo-seam, which are only minor, is evenly distributed on each panel. As a result, a ball is provided which can be perfectly controlled on the shoe and in the air and allows very precise play.
Apart from the more homogeneous deformation and contact properties and the better flight properties, the ball of the invention can also be more cost-efficiently produced since the outer shell is assembled from a lower number of larger panels. Gluing, sewing or any other method to interconnect the panels therefore requires less process steps and working time and can be performed with lower production tolerances.
In some embodiments, the pseudo-seams may extend over the outer surface such that each panel is divided into at least two sub-panels. From an aerodynamic point of view, the ball therefore appears as if it was made of a plurality of small panels and enables precise flight paths without any flutter movements.
In some embodiments, in order to achieve an even distribution over the outer surface, the pseudo-seams may be arranged so that they are not parallel on the outer surface of a panel. On the contrary, in some embodiments, each pseudo-seam may either substantially interconnect two seams, or may form a closed curve on the outer surface of the panel. Other embodiments, are however, also conceivable in which each panel may be divided into four sub-panels by three arcuated pseudo-seams and/or modifications in which one or several additional pseudo-seams are foreseen which may extend parallel to an edge of a sub-panel over at least a part of its surface.
As already mentioned, the outer shell of the ball of the invention can be manufactured from a lower number of panels. In some embodiments, the outer shell may comprise twelve or less panels. In other embodiments, the outer shell may comprise eight panels or less. As a result, a ball may be provided having substantially more homogeneous deformation and contact properties so that it can be precisely controlled by the shoe of the player.
In some embodiments, the outer shell may comprise a first and a second group of panels, each panel of the first group having the shape of a rounded triangle with convex edges and each panel of the second group having six corners with alternating concave and essentially straight edges. The convex edge of a panel of the first group can form a seam with the concave edge of a panel of the second group. Comprehensive tests have revealed that this panel form and the seam distribution resulting out of it are especially beneficial for the play properties of the ball.
In order to avoid excessive tensions in the shell, in some embodiments, the panels may comprise a three-dimensionally domed shape prior to interconnecting them to form the outer shell. This can be achieved by suitable manufacturing methods of the materials used for the panels, such as deep-drawing using a domed mold. Injection molding of the panels is however also conceivable to manufacture complex designs with little effort.
In addition to the pseudo-seams, which serve for improving the aerodynamic properties, in some embodiments, each panel may further comprise a surface texture having a height of ≦ about 0.5 mm, for example ≦ about 0.05 mm. These surface textures or corrugations may be substantially smaller than the pseudo-seams and are therefore of less relevance for the aerodynamic properties of the ball. However, they improve the grip of the ball, in particular when wet, and therefore, facilitate ball control and catching or halting of the ball by the goal keeper.
In some embodiments, each panel may comprise at least one backing material and at least one surface material, wherein the pseudo-seam may be provided in both the backing material and the surface material.
In some embodiments, the backing material may comprise a foamed material and the surface material may comprise at least one thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) film. Other materials can also be used for the plastic films, as for example polyurethane (PU), polyamide (PA), or polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The pseudo-seams and/or the surface texture can be created in many different ways, such as master forming of the surface material and/or the backing material, for example by (multi-component) injection molding, vacuum-forming, deep-drawing and/or laser etching of the TPU film and/or the backing material.
In the following, aspects of the present invention are described in more detail with reference to the accompanying figures. These figures show:
a, b are presentations of a presently preferred embodiment of a ball according to the present invention;
In the following, preferred embodiments and modifications of the present invention are described with reference to a soccer ball. However, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to soccer balls. On the contrary, also other inflatable balls, such as handballs, basketballs, volleyballs, balls for American Football etc. may comprise the features of the present invention.
Extensive experimental tests in a wind tunnel have shown that the probability of flutter movements occurring depends on a number of parameters. An important parameter is, how “smooth” the surface of the ball is. Balls having an outer shell made from a plurality of small panels, such as the ball shown in
However, it was already mentioned in the introductory part that the arrangement of the plurality of seams causes other difficulties, such as inhomogeneous deformation properties and contact properties of the ball over its outer shell, high manufacturing costs and large production tolerances. The latter can also negatively affect the good flight properties of such a ball. If not all of the seams are perfect, this may cause substantial deviations from a straight flight path.
a and 2b present an embodiment of a ball 20 according to the present invention, which overcomes these difficulties but also allows a flight path without a noticeable flutter movement. The presented ball 20 comprises two groups of panels, a first group of panels 30 and a second group of panels 40, which are individually shown in
Where the edges of the panels 30, 40 contact each other, the ball 20 comprises seams 50. These seams 50 can be provided in many different ways. In the presented embodiment, the panels 30, 40 are glued to a carcass (not shown). At the same time, also the lateral edges of the panels 30, 40 are glued to each other so that the seams 50 are provided as bond seams. However, it is also conceivable to interconnect the panels 30, 40 in other ways along the seams 50, such as by sewing, by welding of a suitable plastic material, or the like. Another option is to glue the panels 30, 40 only to the carcass without any bond or other direct interconnection between contacting panels 30, 40. In this case, the seams 50 are exclusively defined by the contact area or the transition region between two adjacent panels 30, 40.
The deterioration of the flight properties as a result of the use of a lower number of larger panels can be avoided if pseudo-seams 60 are arranged on the surface of the panels 30, 40. As shown in
As can be seen in
In some embodiments, the surface of the panels 30 of the other group may also have a pseudo-seam 60. This pseudo-seam 60 forms a closed curve and may extend essentially parallel to the seam 50, which limits the panel 30. Also the panel 30 may be divided by the arrangement of the pseudo-seam 60 into two sub-panels. In some embodiments, these sub-panels have approximately the same size.
Apart from the described pseudo-seams 60, 60′, the hatch in
An important aspect is that the projections do not excessively extend above the surface of the panel, which would lead to a substantial influence on the aerodynamic properties of the ball. In some embodiments, the height of the projections of the surface texture 70 may be ≦ about 0.5 mm. For example, in some embodiments, the height may be ≦ about 0.05 mm.
The pseudo-seams 60, as well as the surface textures 70, of the panels 30, 40 can be created with different manufacturing methods. In the method disclosed in the above mentioned EP 1 424 105 A1, each panel 30, 40 comprises a surface material, made for example from thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), as well as a backing material, which may for example be a PU foam. Other exemplary backing materials are disclosed in the EP 0 894 514 A2 of applicant, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety. According to the method disclosed in EP 1 424 105 A1, for the manufacturing of a ball 20, the surface material may be molded by deep-drawing in a mold to provide the above described three-dimensional dome shape and the pseudo-seams 60 and, if desired, the surface texture 70.
In a similar manner, the backing material may be foamed, which may at the same time be interconnected to the surface material. The produced panels 30, 40 may have a thickness in a range from about 2 mm to about 10 mm, and in some embodiments may have a thickness in the range from about 3 mm to about 6 mm. In some embodiments, the surface material of the finished panel may extend at the edges around the backing material and can therefore be used for providing the seams 50 by gluing, welding, sewing or the like (cf. also
Apart from the described deep-drawing, other forming methods for plastic materials known to the person skilled in the art can be used for producing the panels 30, 40, such as vacuum-forming. In this case, a TPU film or a film made from another suitable plastic material is heated and brought into the desired shape by means of a mold and a vacuum. Also in this method, the surface can be provided with the pseudo-seams 60 and, if desired, with the described surface texture 70 during molding.
Injection molding may also be used for master forming of the panels. In doing so, the surface material and the backing material for a panel can either be successively master formed and glued or can concurrently be injection molded as a two component injection molding or can be injection molded successively with the aid of an insert between layers in a mold. Materials may comprise two component foams of materials with different densities or with different colors. Foams of different colors which are arranged in a panel side by side with a transparent TPU film as surface material opens new design possibilities. A hybrid type of master forming and shaping is also conceivable, for example if the injection molded part which is not completely hardened, is additionally deformed by embossing or by other methods.
Moreover, it is also possible to process the surface after forming/molding, for example by etching with a laser or embossing with a suitable mechanical device. Etching with a laser is particularly advantageous, if the precision of the created structure is important as in the case of the pseudo-seams 60 (see below). A combination of the above methods may also be used, wherein some of the elements of the surface of the panels 30, 40 are created during molding and wherein other elements are created later by processing the surface material and/or the backing material.
Independent of the manufacturing methods used, the panels 30, 40 may comprise several layers made from different backing materials as well as several layers of surface material. Complexes of several layers of a backing material are exemplary explained in the above mentioned EP 0 894 514 A2. Using several TPU layers with different colors for the surface material enables the creation of a particular optical design. For example, a laser may subsequently selectively etch away parts of an upper TPU layer to expose a lower TPU layer of different color. This enables, for example, a simple personalization of a ball, if a long time after its fabrication individual information or graphic arts are generated with a laser for example after an important game.
The values of a width of approximately 2 mm and a depth of approximately 1 mm, discussed above, are exemplary; however, they contribute to an optimization of the flight properties of the ball 20.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 016 287 | Apr 2009 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1559117 | Maynard | Oct 1925 | A |
1931429 | Buckner et al. | Oct 1933 | A |
2149465 | Riddell | Mar 1939 | A |
2280314 | Scudder | Apr 1942 | A |
D198924 | Satchell | Aug 1964 | S |
4000894 | Butzen | Jan 1977 | A |
4318544 | Brine, Jr. | Mar 1982 | A |
D268853 | Brine, Jr. | May 1983 | S |
4570931 | Martin | Feb 1986 | A |
4830373 | Dehnert et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856781 | Shishido et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5165685 | Hynes | Nov 1992 | A |
5470060 | Spiegel | Nov 1995 | A |
D386230 | Gray | Nov 1997 | S |
5709623 | Schwaner | Jan 1998 | A |
5820501 | Soofi | Oct 1998 | A |
5851161 | Sassak | Dec 1998 | A |
D405486 | Chan | Feb 1999 | S |
5888157 | Guenther et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
D408876 | Feeney | Apr 1999 | S |
5931752 | Guenther et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
D416961 | Sonntag et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
5984812 | Sassak | Nov 1999 | A |
D418565 | Burgess | Jan 2000 | S |
D439294 | Hall | Mar 2001 | S |
D440614 | Audero | Apr 2001 | S |
6302815 | Shishido et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D452721 | Sonntag | Jan 2002 | S |
6422961 | Feeney | Jul 2002 | B1 |
D462732 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6503162 | Shishido et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506135 | Ou | Jan 2003 | B2 |
D473275 | Gundra | Apr 2003 | S |
6612948 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
D483424 | Lowinger | Dec 2003 | S |
6685585 | Shishido et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6752732 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D510113 | Kelly | Sep 2005 | S |
D511191 | Fryer | Nov 2005 | S |
D511551 | Llewellyn | Nov 2005 | S |
6971965 | Shishido | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6988969 | Avis | Jan 2006 | B2 |
D516647 | Yang | Mar 2006 | S |
D520086 | Just et al. | May 2006 | S |
7066853 | Chang | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D527432 | Just et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
D529107 | Just et al. | Sep 2006 | S |
D533239 | Yang | Dec 2006 | S |
D544053 | Krysiak | Jun 2007 | S |
D544931 | Laliberty et al. | Jun 2007 | S |
D548292 | Smith | Aug 2007 | S |
D556275 | Crane et al. | Nov 2007 | S |
D558285 | Avis et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D563495 | Torres | Mar 2008 | S |
D568425 | Oono | May 2008 | S |
7427246 | Taniguchi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444770 | Wellington, Jr. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
D583427 | Saghir | Dec 2008 | S |
7462119 | Kelly | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D596249 | Katzke | Jul 2009 | S |
7585236 | Krysiak | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D603916 | Smith et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D613354 | Van Oorschot | Apr 2010 | S |
D613355 | Van Oorschot | Apr 2010 | S |
D613356 | Van Oorschot | Apr 2010 | S |
D618740 | Van Oorschot | Jun 2010 | S |
D620060 | Gibson | Jul 2010 | S |
7749116 | Tang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D634380 | Walling, Jr. et al. | Mar 2011 | S |
8133570 | Fujisawa et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20040134136 | Shearing | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142780 | Estefano | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050170920 | Boyer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060105866 | Ma | May 2006 | A1 |
20060229150 | Ou | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070037642 | Chang | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070117662 | Ma | May 2007 | A1 |
20070225094 | Nix | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080070727 | Avis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080176685 | Madore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080305900 | Geisendorfer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011878 | Ou | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090105019 | Keppler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090209374 | Ou | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090325740 | Krysiak | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325744 | Raynak et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100009790 | Maziarz | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1016122 | Mar 2006 | BE |
202136749 | Feb 2012 | CN |
3726830 | Dec 1988 | DE |
20 2007 013 433 | Sep 2008 | DE |
112008001626 | Jul 2010 | DE |
3021829 | Aug 2005 | GB |
35-12256 | Jun 1960 | JP |
55-91368 | Jul 1980 | JP |
58-152576 | Sep 1983 | JP |
59-125574 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59-125578 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59-232562 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60-018184 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-024855 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60-199472 | Oct 1985 | JP |
60-199473 | Oct 1985 | JP |
60-199474 | Oct 1985 | JP |
1-212578 | Aug 1989 | JP |
1-265979 | Oct 1989 | JP |
7-080097 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8-155055 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8-196662 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9-019516 | Jan 1997 | JP |
11-089971 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-155980 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000-245875 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-170216 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003-033448 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2008-080176 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-188038 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2010 35694 | Feb 2010 | JP |
462300 | Nov 2001 | TW |
DM 057033 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2008132793 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008134029 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for European Application No. 10155323, European Patent Office, Munich, dated Jun. 18, 2010, 5 pages. |
English-language Abstract of BE 1016122 (A6), Published on Mar. 7, 2006. |
Saturnian Fun Gripper 36″ Oversized Soccer Ball [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cdntoyassn.com/details.cfm?id=619, [retrieved on Jan. 12, 2007]. |
Puma V1.06 FIFA A Soccer Ball, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.newhorizonssoccer.com/prod.itml/icOid/1976, [retrieved on Jan. 12, 2007]. |
CSI “Tiger” Practice Rubber Soccer Ball, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/516z5uccDL.—SS500—.jpg, [retrieved on Jan. 12, 2007]. |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 29/335,431, van Oorschot, Ball, filed Apr. 15, 2009. |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 29/335,432, van Oorschot, Ball, filed Apr. 15, 2009. |
Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 29/335,433, van Oorschot, Ball, filed Apr. 15, 2009. |
Villa Giocattoli 1995 product catalog, p. 45: ball (item art. 550) shown on the lower portion of page. |
Ball shown on webpage: http://www.discountattic.com/36605-WorldSoccerBall.jpg, display date Jun. 30, 2009. |
Office Action date Mar. 12, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 29/327,904, van Oorschot, Ball, filed Nov. 14, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100255940 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |