Ballasted sequencing batch reactor system and method for treating wastewater

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8540877
  • Patent Number
    8,540,877
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 26, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2013
    10 years ago
Abstract
A ballasted sequencing batch reactor system for treating wastewater including one or more sequencing batch reactors. A weighting agent impregnation subsystem is configured to mix biological flocs and weighting agent to form weighted biological flocs. A weighting agent recovery subsystem is configured to recover weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs and reintroduce the recovered weighting agent to the weighting agent impregnation subsystem.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a ballasted sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system and method for treating wastewater.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

SBR systems are used to treat wastewater. A typical conventional SBR system includes one or more SBRs which contain a large population of microorganisms that ingest contaminants in the influent wastewater to form biological flocs and treat the wastewater. SBR systems typically use four phases to treat wastewater: fill, react, settle, and decant. During the fill phase, the SBR is filled with the influent wastewater and may be aerated, mixed without aeration, or not mixed and not aerated. The react phase involves adding oxygen, mixing, or a combination thereof, to provide treatment by converting biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) to microorganisms to form biological flocs. During the settle phase, the biological flocs formed in the previous phases are allowed settle to the bottom of the SBR to form settled sludge. The decant phase involves slowly decanting the clear water from the settled sludge to provide a treated effluent.


However, during the settling phase of a typical conventional SBR system, the biological flocs are only marginally heavier than water and therefore settle very slowly. Moreover, the solids separation in the settle phase may be unreliable due to many types of settling problems that are caused by: overgrowth of filamentous organisms, viscous bulking caused by the overgrowth of either zoogleal organisms or exocellular polysaccharide material, pin floc, straggler floc, and the like. This may limit the capacity of a conventional SBR system and can compromise the quality of the treated effluent.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention features a ballasted sequencing batch reactor system for treating wastewater including one or more sequencing batch reactors. A weighting agent impregnation subsystem is configured to mix biological flocs and weighting agent to form weighted biological flocs. A weighting agent recovery subsystem is configured to recover weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs and reintroduce the recovered weighting agent to the weighting agent impregnation subsystem.


In one embodiment, the system may include a sludge storage tank configured to receive settled sludge from the one or more sequencing batch reactors, store the settled sludge therein, and regulate the flow of settled sludge to weighting agent recovery subsystem. The weighting agent recovery subsystem may include a separator subsystem for separating the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. The separator subsystem may include a shear mill. The separator subsystem may include a centrifugal separator. The separator subsystem may include an ultrasonic separator. The separator subsystem may include a shear mill and a wet drum magnetic separator. The separator subsystem may include a shear mill and a centrifugal separator. The separator subsystem may include an ultrasonic separator and a wet drum magnetic separator. The separator subsystem may include an ultrasonic separator and a centrifugal separator. The shear mill may include rotor and a stator, wherein the rotor and/or the stator include slots sized as to optimize separation of weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. The weighting agent impregnation subsystem may include an impregnation tank and at least one mixer. The capacity of the system may be increased by reducing the duration of a settle phase. The one or more sequencing batch reactors may be configured to decant clear effluent from settled sludge to provide a treated effluent. The weighted biological flocs may enhance the quality of the treated effluent by reducing the concentration of suspended solids and related contaminants therein. The system may include a wasting subsystem for wasting settled sludge from the weighting agent recovery subsystem to control a population of microorganisms in a mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors. The capacity of the system may be increased by increasing the concentration of the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors by reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by a wasting subsystem. The capacity of the system may be increased by reducing the duration of a react phase. The amount of settled sludge wasted by the wasting subsystem may be reduced to increase the concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids for enhancing nitrification and/or de-nitrification of ammonia in the mixed liquid. Nitrification may be enhanced by increasing the amount of dissolved oxygen introduced into the one or more sequencing batch reactors. A coagulant may be added to the one or more sequencing batch reactors for removing phosphorus by precipitation and/or coagulation. A flocculant may be added to the one or more sequencing batch reactors for enhancing settling and thickening of the weighted biological flocs and for providing agglomeration of non-impregnated biological flocs and/or partially impregnated biological flocs with weighted biological flocs. The weighting agent impregnation subsystem may include a venturi mixer/eductor. A majority of the weighting agent may have a particle size less than about 100 μm. A majority of the weighting agent may have a particle size less than about 40 μm. A majority of the weighting agent may have a particle size less than about 20 μm. The weighting agent may include magnetite. The system may include a mixer disposed in each of the one or more sequencing batch reactors for maintaining the suspended solids or the mixed liquor in suspension.


This invention also features a method for treating wastewater using one or more sequencing batch reactors, the method including the steps of: a) receiving influent wastewater in the one or more sequencing batch reactors, b) forming biological flocs in the one or more sequencing batch reactors, c) impregnating weighting agent into the biological flocs to form weighted biological flocs, and d) recovering weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs to reintroduce the weighting agent to step c).


In one embodiment, the method may include the step of separating the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. The method may include the step of collecting the weighting agent and recycling the weighting agent to step c). The method may include the step of providing weighting agent in which the majority of the weighting agent has a particle size less than about 100 μm. The method may include the step of providing weighting agent in which the majority of the weighting agent has a particle size less than about 40 μm. The method may include the step of providing weighting agent in which the majority of the weighting agent has a particle size less than about 20 μm. The method may include the step of introducing dissolved oxygen to a population of microorganisms to promote growth of biological flocs in a mixed liquor defined by a concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids. The method may include the step of introducing a flocculant to the mixed liquor to enhance settling and thickening of the weighted biological flocs and to establish agglomeration of non-impregnated biological flocs and/or partially impregnated biological flocs with the weighted biological flocs. The method may include the step of separating and collecting the weighted biological flocs from the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors to provide a secondary effluent and a settled sludge. The method may include the step of recycling the majority of the settled sludge to step b). The method may include the step of decanting the clean effluent from the settled sludge in the one or more sequencing batch reactors to provide a treated effluent. The method may include the step of wasting the remaining settled sludge using a wasting subsystem to control the population of the microorganisms in the mixed liquor. The method may include the step of increasing the capacity of the system by reducing the duration of a settle phase. The method may include the step of enhancing the quality of the treated effluent by reducing suspended solids and related contaminants therein. The method may include the step of wasting settled sludge from the weighting agent recovery subsystem to control a population of microorganisms in a mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors. The method may include the step of increasing the capacity of the system by increasing the concentration of the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors by reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by a wasting subsystem. The method may include the step of increasing the capacity of the system by reducing the duration of a react phase. The method may include the step of reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by the wasting subsystem to increase the concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids which enhances nitrification and/or de-nitrification of ammonia in the mixed liquid. The method may include the step of enhancing nitrification by increasing the amount of dissolved oxygen introduced into the one or more sequencing batch reactors. The weighting agent may be impregnated into the biological flocs in step b) by mixing the mixed liquor and the biological flocs at a predetermined energy level.


The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of one embodiment of the SBR system for treating wastewater in accordance with this invention;



FIG. 2 is a microscopic view showing one example of weighting agent impregnated in biological flocs using the weighting agent impregnation system shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram showing another embodiment of the SBR system for treating wastewater of this invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic side-view of another embodiment of the impregnation subsystem shown in FIGS. 1 and 3;



FIG. 5A is a schematic side-view of one embodiment of the separator shown in FIGS. 1 and 3;



FIG. 5B is a schematic top view showing one example of slots in the rotor and stator of the shear mill shown in FIG. 5A;



FIG. 5C is a three-dimensional view of one embodiment of the shear mill in FIG. 5A;



FIG. 6 is a three-dimensional front-view of another embodiment of the separator shown in FIGS. 1 and 3; and



FIG. 7 is a three-dimensional front-view of yet another embodiment of the separator shown in FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.


There is shown in FIG. 1, one embodiment of SBR system 10 for treating wastewater of this invention. System 10 includes at least one SBR 12 which receives a flow of influent wastewater 14 by line 16. SBR 12 preferably introduces air bubbles 18 by line 20 exposed to ambient air 22. Air bubbles 18 introduce dissolved oxygen to a population of microorganisms in SBR 12 to promote growth of biological flocs 23 in mixed liquor 24. Mixed liquor 24 as used herein means a combination of influent wastewater 14 and biological flocs 23.


System 10 also includes weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 which, in one embodiment, includes impregnation tank 28 and mixer 30 which receives mixed liquor 24 from SBR 12 by line 32. In one embodiment, impregnation tank 28 preferably receives virgin weighting agent 33, e.g., from feed hopper 34 by line 36, and/or recycled weighting agent 38 from weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 (discussed below). Weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 mixes mixed liquor 24 or settled sludge received by line 77 and virgin weighting agent 33 and/or the recycled weighting agent 38 in impregnation tank 28 to impregnate the weighting agent into biological flocs 23 suspended in mixed liquor 24 or settled sludge by line 77 via sludge storage tank 88 and line 76 and/or via lines 76 and 81 to form weighted biological flocs. Mixer 30 utilizes a mixing energy which is sufficient to impregnate the weighting agent into biological flocs suspended in a mixed liquor to form weighted biological flocs. FIG. 2 shows one example of weighting agent 33, 38 impregnated into biological flocs 23 to form weighted biological flocs 25. The weighted biological flocs impregnated with the weighting agent are then sent back to SBR 12, FIG. 1, by line 37.


The weighting agent may be magnetite, or any similar type weighting agent or magnetically separable inorganic material known to those skilled in the art which increases the density of the biological flocs. In one example, the majority of the weighting agent particles may have a size less than about 100 μm. In other examples, the majority of the weighting agent particles may have a size less than about 40 μm, or, the majority of the weighting agent may have a particle size less than about 20 μm.


System 10 also includes weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 which receives settled sludge from bottom 39 of SBR 12 by line 76 typically after the settle and decant phases are complete. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 preferably includes separator 78 which recovers the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs in the settled sludge in line 76 and reintroduces (recycles) the weighting agent to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 by line 79. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 may include recovery subsystem 83, discussed below.


In one embodiment, system 10 includes sludge storage tank 88 which stores settled sludge output from SBR 12 by line 76 typically after the decant phase is complete.


In one exemplary operation of SBR system 10, SBR 12 is filled with influent wastewater 14 via line 16 and seeded with a large population of microorganisms that ingest contaminants in influent wastewater 14 to form biological flocs 23. During a fill phase, dissolved oxygen via air bubbles 18 may be introduced to mixed liquor 24 to promote growth of biological flocs 23. Once filled, system 10 undergoes a react phase. During the fill and/or react phases, weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 receives the mixed liquor by line 32, or settled sludge by line 77 via sludge storage tank 88 and line 76 and/or via lines 76 and 81, and impregnates the biological flocs therein with virgin weighting agent 33 and/or recycled weighting agent 38 using mixer 30. The mixed liquor or settled sludge having weighted biological flocs is then sent back to SBR 12 by line 37. The react phase is followed by the settling phase where the weighted biological flocs settle to bottom 39 of SBR 12 to form settled sludge. The times for the fill, react, settle, and decant phases vary as known by those skilled in the art. Then, the clear effluent is decanted by line 52 to provide treated effluent 50. During or after the decant phase, some of the settled sludge at bottom 39 of SBR 12 may be sent to sludge storage tank 88 via line 76. Sludge storage tank 88 stores sludge from SBR 12 and regulates the flow thereof to weighting agent recovery subsystem 74. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 then recovers the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs as discussed above and recycles the weighting agent to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 as recovered weighting agent 38.


Because the weighted biological flocs in SBR 12 have a greater specific gravity than non-impregnated biological flocs, they settle faster than non-impregnated biological flocs utilized in a typical conventional SBR system. Thus, the time needed for the settling phase of system 10 is reduced. This alleviates settling problems associated with a conventional SBR system, such as overgrowth of filamentous organisms, viscous bulking caused by the overgrowth of either zoogleal organisms or exocellular polysaccharide material, pin floc, straggler floc, and the like. The result is the capacity of system 10 to treat wastewater may be increased while providing high quality treated effluent 50. Because the time needed in the settling phase is reduced, system 10 may also allow more time for the react phase, which further increases the quality of treated effluent 50. The weighted biological flocs also enhance the quality of the treated effluent by reducing the concentration of suspended solids and related contaminants therein. The weighted biological flocs also facilitate higher mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations. Operating at higher MLSS concentrations provides additional advantages, including additional increased treatment capacity, enhanced nitrogen removal, enhanced phosphorus removal, and the like. Moreover, because weighting agent recovery subsystem 74 recovers and recycles the weighting agent, the operational costs of system 10 are significantly reduced.


System 10′, FIG. 3, where like parts have been given like numbers, includes at least two SBRs 12′ and 12″. In this example, SBR 12′ is filled with influent wastewater 14 by line 16 by opening valve 62 and closing valve 64. Once SBR 12′ is filled, valve 62 is closed and valve 64 is open. SBR 12″ is then similarly filled with influent wastewater 14. Thus, system 10′ allows a continuous flow of influent wastewater 14 to either SBR 12′ or SBR 12″ for continuous operation. System 10 is not limited to two SBRs, as any number of SBRs may be utilized to accommodate the flow rate of influent wastewater 14. In one example, after SBR 12′ is filled and SBR 12″ is in the fill phase, SBR 12′ undergoes the react, settle, and decant phases. Similarly, when SBR 12′ is in the fill phase, SBR 12″ typically undergoes the react, settle, and decant phases.


System 10′ may include sludge storage tank 88′ which receives some of the settled sludge from SBR 12′ via line 90 and some of the settled sludge from SBR 12″ via line 92 during or after the decant phase in each respective SBR 12′, 12″.


System 10′ also includes weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26′ which, in this embodiment, is located downstream from sludge storage tank 88′. In this example, impregnation tank 28 and mixer 30 receives settled sludge from sludge storage tank 88′ by line 100. Impregnation tank 28 also preferably receives virgin weighting agent 33, e.g., from feed hopper 34 by line 36, and/or recycled weighting agent 38 from weighting agent recovery subsystem 74. Mixer 30 mixes the settled sludge and virgin weighting agent 33 and/or the recycled weighting agent 38 in impregnation tank 28 to impregnate the weighting agent into the biological flocs suspended in the settled sludge to form weighted biological flocs, similarly as discussed with reference to FIG. 1.


System 10′, FIG. 3, also includes weighting agent recovery subsystem 74′ which receives the sludge from sludge storage tank 88′. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74′ preferably includes separator 78, which in this embodiment, is located downstream from sludge storage tank 88′ and upstream from weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26. Separator 78 recovers the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs in the settled sludge in line 95 from sludge storage tank 88′ and reintroduces (recycles) the recovered weighting agent 38 to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 via line 79. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74′ may include recovery subsystem 83, FIG. 3, e.g., a wet drum magnetic separator or similar type device, which is typically located downstream from separator 78.


In one exemplary operation of system 10′, valve 62 is opened and valve 64 is closed to fill SBR 12′ (SBR #1) with influent wastewater 14. Then valve 62 is closed and valve 64 is opened to fill SBR 12″ (SBR #2). While SBR 12″ is being filled, SBR 12′ undergoes the react, settle, and decant phases as discussed above. During or after the decant phase in SBR 12′, excess (waste) settled sludge at the bottom of SBR 12′ is pumped to sludge storage tank 88′ via line 90. Some of the settled sludge in sludge storage tank 88 may be directed via line 100 to weighting agent impregnation tank 28 of weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26′ and some of the sludge in sludge storage tank 88 may be directed to separator 78 via line 95. Weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26′ impregnates virgin weighting agent 33 and/or recovered weighting agent 38 into the biological flocs in the settled sludge in impregnation tank 28 using mixer 30.


Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74′ then sends the settled sludge having weighted biological flocs therein to line 16 via line 76. At this point, SBR 12″ (SBR #2) has been filled so valve 62 is opened and valve 64 is closed so that the mixture of influent wastewater 14 and the settled sludge having weighted biological flocs therein is directed to fill SBR 12′ (SBR #1). At this point, SBR 12″ is undergoing the react, settle, and decant phases. Similar, as discussed above, during or after decant phase, some of the settled sludge at the bottom of SBR 12″ is pumped to sludge storage tank 88′ via line 92. This settled sludge is processed by weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26′ as discussed above to form weighted biological flocs in the settled sludge in impregnation mixing tank 28. Weighting agent recovery subsystem 74′ then directs the settled sludge with the weighted biological flocs therein to line 16, as discussed above. Valve 62 is closed and valve 64 is open to fill SBR 12″ with the mixture of influent wastewater and settled sludge having weighted biological flocs. The process of switching between SBR 12′ and SBR 12″ continues when ever system 10′ is operational.


Similar as discussed above, the weighted biological flocs introduced to mixed liquor 24 in SBRs 12′, 12″ settle faster to reduce the time needed for their respective settling phases. This increases the capacity system 10′ to treat wastewater and alleviates the problems associated with conventional SBR systems discussed above and provides a cleaner treated effluent 50′, 50″.


Similar as discussed above, flocculant 62, FIG. 3, may be added to mixed liquor 24 in SBR 12′, 12″ to enhance settling and thickening of the weighted biological flocs suspended in mixed liquor 24 in SBR 12 and establishes agglomeration of non-impregnated biological flocs and/or partially impregnated biological flocs with the weighted biological flocs in SBR 12′, 12″. The weighted biological flocs also provide a cleaner treated effluent, with fewer suspended solids and related contaminants.


Coagulant 64 may also be added to SBR 12′, 12″ for removing phosphorus from mixed liquor 24 by precipitation and/or coagulation, as known by those skilled in the art. Mixer 40 and/or air bubbles 18 may be used to maintain biological flocs 23 in suspension in mixed liquor 24 and to mix the flocculant and/or the coagulant with mixed liquor 24 in SBR 12′, 12″.


In another embodiment, weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26′ may receive mixed liquor 24 directly from SBR 12′ or directly from SBR 12″. Similar as discussed above with reference to FIG. 1, weighting agent impregnation tank 28 mixes mixed liquor 24 and virgin weighting agent 33 and/or recovered weighting agent 38 from separator 78 and/or recovery subsystem 83 to impregnate the weighting agent into biological flocs suspended in the mixed liquor to form weighted biological flocs. The weighted biological flocs are then sent back to SBR 12′ or to SBR 12″.


Thus, system 10′ can impregnate the biological flocs either by impregnating the biological flocs in the mixed liquor in SBRs 12′, 12″, or by impregnating the biological flocs in the settled sludge output by SBRs 12′, 12″, or using a combination of both methods.


System 10, FIG. 1, and/or system 10′, FIG. 3, may also utilize weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26″, FIG. 4, where like parts have been given like numbers. Weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26″ includes venturi mixer/eductor 27 having nozzle 31 and funnel 45 which receives virgin weighting agent 33, e.g., from tank 34 by line 36, and/or recycled weighting agent 38 from separator 78 or recovery subsystem 83, FIGS. 1 and 3. Venturi mixer/eductor 27 preferably receives mixed liquor by line 32, FIG. 1, or settled sludge by line 77, or settled sludge by line 100, FIG. 3.


In operation, the velocity of mixed liquor in line 32, FIG. 1, or the settled sludge in line 77, or line 100, FIG. 3, is increased through nozzle 31, FIG. 4. Virgin weighting agent 33 and/or recycled weighting agent 38 in funnel 45 enters nozzle 31 by line 39 and travels downstream to line 37. The widening of line 37 at 41 induces intimate mixing and entrainment, as shown at 43. This impregnates the virgin and/or recycled weighting agent into the biological flocs to form weighted biological flocs. The weighted biological flocs are then returned to SBR 12, FIG. 1, by line 37, or SBR 12′, 12″, FIG. 3, by lines 76 and 16.


In one design, separator subsystem 78, FIGS. 1 and 3 may be configured as shear mill 112, FIG. 5A, which shears the sludge in line 76, FIG. 1, or line 95, FIG. 3, to separate the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. Shear mill 112 ideally includes rotor 80 and stator 82. In operation, the settled sludge in line 76, FIG. 1 or 95, FIG. 3, enters shear mill 112 and flows in the direction of arrows 180 and enters rotor 80 and then stator 82. Shear mill 112 is designed such that there is a close tolerance between rotor 80, FIG. 5B and stator 82, as shown at 93. Rotor 80 is preferably driven at high rotational speeds, e.g., greater than about 1,000 r.p.m., to form a mixture of weighting agent and obliterated flocs in area 181, FIG. 5A, of shear mill 112. The mixture of weighting agent and obliterated flocs exits shear mill 112 by line 79, as shown by arrows 184. FIG. 5C shows in further detail the structure of one embodiment of shear mill 112. Preferably, rotor 80, FIGS. 5A-5C, and/or stator 82 includes slots which function as a centrifugal pump to draw the settled sludge from above and below rotor 80 and stator 82, as shown by paths 182, FIG. 5A, and then hurl the materials off the slot tips at a very high speed to break the weighted biological flocs into the mixture of weighting agent and obliterated flocs. For example, rotor 80, FIG. 5B, may include slots 186, and stator 82 may include slots 188. Slots 186 in rotor 80 and/or slots 188 in stator 82 are preferably optimized to increase shear energy to efficiently separate the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. The shear developed by rotor 80 and stator 82 depends on the width of slots 186 and 188, the tolerance between rotor 80 and stator 82, and the rotor tip speed. The result is shear mill 112 provides a shearing effect which effectively and efficiently separates the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs to facilitate recovery of the weighting agent.


In another design, separator subsystem 78, FIGS. 1 and 3, may be configured as ultrasonic separator 116, FIG. 6, where like parts have been given like numbers. Ultrasonic separator 116 typically includes one or more ultrasonic transducers, e.g., ultrasonic transducer 262, 264, 266, 268, and/or 270, available from Hielscher Ultrasonics GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, which generates fluctuations of pressure and cavitation in the settled sludge in line 76, FIG. 1 or line 95, FIG. 3. This results in microturbulences that produce a shearing effect to create a mixture of weighting agent and obliterated flocs to effectively separate the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs in the settled sludge. The resulting mixture of weighting agent and obliterated flocs exits ultrasonic separator 116 by line 79.


In yet another design, separator subsystem 78, FIG. 7, where like parts have been given like numbers, may be configured as centrifugal separator 118. Centrifugal separator 114 typically includes cylindrical section 302 located at the top of hydrocyclone 300 and conical base 304 located below section 302. The settled sludge in line 76, FIG. 1 or line 100, FIG. 3, is fed tangentially into cylindrical section 302 via port 303. Smaller exit port 306 (underflow or reject port) is located at the bottom of conical section 304 and larger exit port 308 (overflow or accept port) is located at the top of cylindrical section 302.


In operation, the centrifugal force created by the tangential feed of the sludge by port 303 causes the denser weighting agent to be separated from the biological flocs in the settled sludge. The separated weighting agent is expelled against wall 308 of conical section 304 and exits at port 306. This effectively separates the weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs. The recovered weighting agent 38 exits via port 306 and may be deposited to weighting agent impregnation system 26, 26′, or 26″, FIGS. 1, 3, and 4. The less dense biological flocs remain in the sludge and exit via port 308 through tube 310 extending slightly into the body of the center of centrifugal separator 118.


Although as discussed above, separator subsystem 78 may be configured as a shear mill, an ultrasonic separator, or a centrifugal separator, this is not a necessary limitation of this invention. In other designs, separator subsystem 78 may be configured as a tubular bowl, a chamber bowl, an imperforate basket, a disk stack separator, and the like, as known by those skilled in the art.


In the example above where a separator 78, FIGS. 5A-5C, is configured as shear mill 112 to create the mixture of weighting agent and obliterated biological flocs, a wet drum magnetic separator or centrifugal separator 118, FIG. 7, may be used to recover the weighting agent therefrom e.g., recycled weighting agent 38, FIGS. 1 and 3, delivered to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 by line 79 and/or recycled weighting agent 38, FIG. 7, delivered to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 via port 306.


In the example where separator subsystem 78, FIG. 6, is configured as an ultrasonic separator 116 to create the mixture of weighting agent and obliterated biological flocs, a wet drum magnetic separator or centrifugal separator 118, FIG. 7, may be used to recover the weighting agent therefrom, e.g., recycled weighting agent 38, FIGS. 1 and 3, delivered to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 by line 79 and/or recycled weighting agent 38, FIG. 7, delivered to weighting agent impregnation subsystem 26 via port 306.


The result of recovering and recycling the weighting agent as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 5A-7 significantly reduces the operating costs of wastewater treatment system 10.


System 10, 10′, FIGS. 1 and 3, may also include wasting subsystem 85 coupled to separator 78 and/or recovery subsystem 85 which wastes the remaining settled sludge output by separator subsystem 78 and/or recovery subsystem 83 to control the population of the microorganisms in mixed liquor 24 in SBR 12, FIG. 1, or SBR 12′, 12″, FIG. 3. The capacity of system 10, 10′, FIGS. 1 and 3 to process wastewater 14 may be increased by increasing the concentration of the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) in SBR 12, FIG. 1, or SBR 12′, 12″, FIG. 3, by reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by wasting subsystem 85. Increasing the concentration of the MLSS may reduce the duration of the react phase. The amount of settled sludge wasted by wasting subsystem 85 may also be reduced to increase the concentration of MLSS to enhance nitrification and/or de-nitrification of ammonia in mixed liquor 24. The nitrification process may also be further enhanced by increasing the amount of dissolved oxygen introduced to SBR 12, 12′, 12″ via bubbles 18.


Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.


Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.


In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant cannot be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.

Claims
  • 1. A ballasted sequencing batch reactor system for treating wastewater comprising: one or more sequencing batch reactors fluidly connected to a source of wastewater, the one or more sequencing batch reactors comprising a treated effluent outlet and a waste activated sludge outlet;a weighting agent impregnation subsystem fluidly connected to a biological flocs outlet of the one or more sequencing batch reactors and comprising a weighted biological flocs outlet fluidly connected to the one or more sequencing batch reactors, the weighting agent impregnation subsystem configured to mix suspended biological flocs and weighting agent to form weighted biological flocs;a weighting agent recovery subsystem fluidly connected to the waste activated sludge outlet of the one or more sequencing batch reactors and an inlet of the weighting agent impregnation subsystem, the weighting agent recovery subsystem configured to recover weighting agent from the weighted biological flocs of a waste activated sludge and reintroduce the recovered weighting agent to the weighting agent impregnation subsystem.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a sludge storage tank configured to receive settled sludge comprising settled weighted biological flocs from the waste activated sludge outlet of the one or more sequencing batch reactors, store the settled sludge therein, and regulate the flow of the settled sludge to the weighting agent recovery subsystem.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the weighting agent recovery subsystem comprises a separator subsystem for separating the weighting agent from the settled weighted biological flocs, the separator subsystem comprising at least one of a shear mill, a centrifugal separator, an ultrasonic separator and a wet drum magnetic separator.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more sequencing batch reactors are configured to decant effluent from settled sludge comprising settled weighted biological flocs to provide a treated effluent.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, further comprising a wasting subsystem for wasting settled sludge comprising settled weighted biological flocs from the weighting agent recovery subsystem to control a population of microorganisms in a mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the weighting agent has a particle size less than about 40 μm.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the weighting agent comprises magnetite.
  • 8. A method for treating wastewater using one or more sequencing batch reactors, the method comprising: introducing influent wastewater to the one or more sequencing batch reactors to form suspended biological flocs;introducing a portion of the suspended biological flocs into a weighting agent impregnation subsystem to impregnate the weighting agent into the suspended biological flocs and to form weighted biological flocs;introducing the weighted biological flocs from the weighting agent impregnation subsystem to the one or more sequencing batch reactors; andintroducing at least a portion of a settled sludge comprising settled weighted biological flocs to a weighting agent recovery system to recover weighting agent from the settled weighted biological flocs.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising introducing a recovered weighting agent from the weighting agent recovery system to the weighting agent impregnation subsystem.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the weighting agent has a particle size less than about 40 μm.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, further comprising introducing dissolved oxygen to a population of microorganisms to promote growth of suspended biological flocs in a mixed liquor defined by a concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising introducing a flocculant to the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors to enhance settling and thickening of the weighted biological flocs and to establish agglomeration of non-impregnated biological flocs and/or partially impregnated biological flocs with the weighted biological flocs.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising separating and collecting the weighted biological flocs from the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors to provide a secondary effluent and the settled sludge.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising recycling the settled sludge.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, further comprising decanting the effluent from the settled sludge in the one or more sequencing batch reactors to provide a treated effluent.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, further comprising wasting a portion of the settled sludge using a wasting subsystem to control the population of the microorganisms in the mixed liquor.
  • 17. The method of claim 8, further comprising wasting settled sludge from the weighting agent recovery subsystem to control a population of microorganisms in a mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising increasing the capacity of the system by increasing the concentration of the mixed liquor in the one or more sequencing batch reactors by reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by a wasting subsystem.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, further comprising reducing the amount of settled sludge wasted by the wasting subsystem to increase the concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids which enhances nitrification and/or de-nitrification of ammonia in the mixed liquid.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/799,573, filed on Apr. 27, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/584,545, filed Sep. 8, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/008,216, filed Jan. 9, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,695,623, issued Apr. 13, 2010, which claims benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/879,373, filed Jan. 9, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/994,553, filed Sep. 20, 2007, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (358)
Number Name Date Kind
438579 Faunce et al. Oct 1890 A
531183 Harris Dec 1894 A
653010 Koyl Jul 1900 A
728062 Wilson May 1903 A
1064807 Yost Jun 1913 A
1310461 Williams Jul 1919 A
1383287 Campbell Jul 1921 A
1401288 Sodeau Dec 1921 A
1948080 Thomas Feb 1934 A
2065123 Downes Dec 1936 A
2129267 Fischer Sep 1938 A
2232294 Urbain et al. Feb 1941 A
2232296 Urbain et al. Feb 1941 A
2268461 Nichols Dec 1941 A
2326575 Stearns Aug 1943 A
2359748 Clemens Oct 1944 A
2391494 Walker Dec 1945 A
2401924 Goetz Jun 1946 A
2564515 Vogel Aug 1951 A
2597561 Blind May 1952 A
2652925 Vermeiren Sep 1953 A
2713028 Jenks Jul 1955 A
2758715 Fowler Aug 1956 A
2825464 Mack Mar 1958 A
2945590 Stearns Jul 1960 A
3066095 Hronas Nov 1962 A
3080264 Zimmie Mar 1963 A
3142638 Blaisdell et al. Jul 1964 A
3228878 Moody Jan 1966 A
3350302 Demeter et al. Oct 1967 A
3575852 Hughes Apr 1971 A
3617561 Fanselow Nov 1971 A
3622461 Wagner et al. Nov 1971 A
3627678 Marston et al. Dec 1971 A
3676337 Kolm Jul 1972 A
3690454 Bekhtle et al. Sep 1972 A
3693795 Robinson et al. Sep 1972 A
3697420 Blaisdell et al. Oct 1972 A
3767351 Blaser Oct 1973 A
3819589 Fauke et al. Jun 1974 A
3856666 Yashima et al. Dec 1974 A
3886064 Kosonen May 1975 A
3887457 Marston et al. Jun 1975 A
3920543 Marston et al. Nov 1975 A
3929632 Buriks et al. Dec 1975 A
3929635 Buriks et al. Dec 1975 A
3950319 Schmidt et al. Apr 1976 A
3951807 Sanderson Apr 1976 A
3959133 Fulton May 1976 A
3983033 de Latour Sep 1976 A
4024040 Phalangas et al. May 1977 A
4025432 Nolan et al. May 1977 A
4033864 Nolan et al. Jul 1977 A
4046681 Marston et al. Sep 1977 A
4066991 Marston et al. Jan 1978 A
4089779 Neal May 1978 A
4110208 Neal Aug 1978 A
4139456 Yabuuchi et al. Feb 1979 A
4142970 von Hagel et al. Mar 1979 A
4151090 Brigante Apr 1979 A
4153559 Sanderson May 1979 A
4167480 Mach Sep 1979 A
4176042 Fahlstrom Nov 1979 A
4190539 Besik Feb 1980 A
4193866 Slusarczuk et al. Mar 1980 A
4204948 Wechsler et al. May 1980 A
4274968 Grutsch et al. Jun 1981 A
4290898 von Hagel et al. Sep 1981 A
4297484 Quinlan Oct 1981 A
4320012 Palm et al. Mar 1982 A
4339347 Quinlan Jul 1982 A
4341657 Quinlan Jul 1982 A
4343730 Becker et al. Aug 1982 A
4357237 Sanderson Nov 1982 A
4358382 Quinlan Nov 1982 A
4359382 Morgan Nov 1982 A
4377483 Yamashita et al. Mar 1983 A
4388195 von Hagel et al. Jun 1983 A
4402833 Bennett et al. Sep 1983 A
4454047 Becker et al. Jun 1984 A
4465597 Herman et al. Aug 1984 A
4482459 Shiver Nov 1984 A
4502958 Sasaki Mar 1985 A
4522643 Quinlan Jun 1985 A
4563286 Johnson et al. Jan 1986 A
4579655 Louboutin et al. Apr 1986 A
4588508 Allenson et al. May 1986 A
4595506 Kneer Jun 1986 A
4654139 Baba et al. Mar 1987 A
4655933 Johnson et al. Apr 1987 A
4686035 Estabrook Aug 1987 A
4689154 Zimberg Aug 1987 A
4699951 Allenson et al. Oct 1987 A
4735725 Reischl et al. Apr 1988 A
4752401 Bodenstein Jun 1988 A
4765900 Schwoyer et al. Aug 1988 A
4765908 Monick et al. Aug 1988 A
4783265 Timmons Nov 1988 A
4795557 Bourbigot et al. Jan 1989 A
4827890 Pociask et al. May 1989 A
4843105 Reischl et al. Jun 1989 A
4849128 Timmons et al. Jul 1989 A
4851123 Mishra Jul 1989 A
4864075 Thompson et al. Sep 1989 A
4872993 Harrison Oct 1989 A
4874508 Fritz Oct 1989 A
4882064 Dixon et al. Nov 1989 A
4921597 Lurie May 1990 A
4921613 Nordberg et al. May 1990 A
4927543 Bablon et al. May 1990 A
4938876 Ohsol Jul 1990 A
4940550 Watson Jul 1990 A
4944278 Woodard Jul 1990 A
4944279 Woodard Jul 1990 A
4956099 Thompson et al. Sep 1990 A
4981593 Priestley et al. Jan 1991 A
5009791 Lin et al. Apr 1991 A
5013451 Thompson et al. May 1991 A
5019274 Thompson et al. May 1991 A
5023012 Buchan et al. Jun 1991 A
5026483 Thompson et al. Jun 1991 A
5055194 Goetz et al. Oct 1991 A
5064531 Wang et al. Nov 1991 A
5069783 Wang et al. Dec 1991 A
5084733 Katoh et al. Jan 1992 A
5089120 Eberhardt Feb 1992 A
5089227 Thompson et al. Feb 1992 A
5089619 Thompson et al. Feb 1992 A
5112494 Yan May 1992 A
5112499 Murray et al. May 1992 A
5149438 Hebert Sep 1992 A
5187326 Shirai Feb 1993 A
5234603 Potts Aug 1993 A
5266200 Reid Nov 1993 A
5298168 Guess Mar 1994 A
5310642 Vargas et al. May 1994 A
5369072 Benjamin et al. Nov 1994 A
5377845 Hamen et al. Jan 1995 A
5383539 Bair et al. Jan 1995 A
5395527 Desjardins Mar 1995 A
5397476 Bradbury et al. Mar 1995 A
5462670 Guess Oct 1995 A
5545330 Ehrlich Aug 1996 A
5560493 Perry Oct 1996 A
5593590 Steyskal Jan 1997 A
5595666 Kochen et al. Jan 1997 A
5596392 Danzuka Jan 1997 A
5597479 Johnson Jan 1997 A
5616250 Johnson et al. Apr 1997 A
5637221 Coyne Jun 1997 A
5693461 Bagchi et al. Dec 1997 A
5702809 Tixier et al. Dec 1997 A
5730864 Delsalle et al. Mar 1998 A
5731134 Honan et al. Mar 1998 A
5770091 Binot et al. Jun 1998 A
5779908 Anderson et al. Jul 1998 A
5800717 Ramsay et al. Sep 1998 A
5805965 Tsuda et al. Sep 1998 A
5840195 Delsalle et al. Nov 1998 A
5856072 Leone et al. Jan 1999 A
5893355 Glover et al. Apr 1999 A
5925290 Hills Jul 1999 A
5976375 Dorica et al. Nov 1999 A
5976771 Kosugi et al. Nov 1999 A
6010631 Delsalle et al. Jan 2000 A
6030761 Taguchi et al. Feb 2000 A
6093318 Saho et al. Jul 2000 A
6099738 Wechsler et al. Aug 2000 A
6149014 Mankosa et al. Nov 2000 A
6151467 Yamaguchi Nov 2000 A
6160976 Karakama et al. Dec 2000 A
6185393 Karakama et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210587 Vion Apr 2001 B1
6210588 Vion Apr 2001 B1
6221253 Fukase et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221262 MacDonald et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228269 Cort May 2001 B1
6228565 Ohzeki et al. May 2001 B1
6251576 Taguchi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6277285 Vion Aug 2001 B1
6290849 Rykaer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6379549 LePoder et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383370 Keever et al. May 2002 B1
6386781 Gueret May 2002 B1
6406624 DeVos Jun 2002 B1
6423485 Yamada et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432303 Chesner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447686 Choi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6472132 Yamada et al. Oct 2002 B1
6485652 Le Poder et al. Nov 2002 B1
6517714 Streat Feb 2003 B2
6576145 Conaway et al. Jun 2003 B2
6613232 Chesner et al. Sep 2003 B2
6645386 Moreau et al. Nov 2003 B1
6689277 Streat Feb 2004 B2
6692173 Gueret Feb 2004 B2
6706467 Howe et al. Mar 2004 B2
6740245 Johnson May 2004 B2
6759018 Arno et al. Jul 2004 B1
6783679 Rozich Aug 2004 B1
6811885 Andriessen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824692 Binot et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832691 Miles et al. Dec 2004 B2
6875351 Arnaud Apr 2005 B2
6896815 Cort May 2005 B2
6902678 Tipton Jun 2005 B2
6919031 Blumenschein et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923901 Leffler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6960294 Arnaud Nov 2005 B2
6966993 Binot Nov 2005 B2
6968138 Akutsu Nov 2005 B2
7001525 Binot et al. Feb 2006 B2
7083715 Binot Aug 2006 B2
7153431 Daugherty Dec 2006 B2
7160448 Johnson Jan 2007 B2
7210581 Robinson et al. May 2007 B2
7244362 Binot Jul 2007 B2
7255793 Cort Aug 2007 B2
7276165 Morgoun Oct 2007 B2
7309435 Rozich Dec 2007 B2
7311841 Binot et al. Dec 2007 B2
7323108 Garbett et al. Jan 2008 B1
7407582 Sun Aug 2008 B2
7407593 Frederick, Jr. et al. Aug 2008 B2
7438817 Nagghappan et al. Oct 2008 B2
7449105 Hastings Nov 2008 B2
7476324 Ciampi et al. Jan 2009 B2
7494592 Deskins Feb 2009 B2
7563366 Sun Jul 2009 B2
7601261 Palacios Donaque Oct 2009 B2
7608190 Banerjee et al. Oct 2009 B1
7625490 Cort Dec 2009 B2
7648637 Sauvignet et al. Jan 2010 B1
7648638 Essemiani et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651620 Vion Jan 2010 B2
7678278 Binot et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686079 Gamache et al. Mar 2010 B2
7686960 Cort Mar 2010 B2
7691261 Deskins Apr 2010 B2
7691269 Cort Apr 2010 B2
7695623 Woodard et al. Apr 2010 B2
7695630 de Guevara Apr 2010 B2
7704390 Leffler et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704399 Condit Apr 2010 B2
7722843 Srinivasachar May 2010 B1
7729778 Eggers et al. Jun 2010 B2
7820025 Ciampi et al. Oct 2010 B2
7820053 Cort Oct 2010 B2
7820054 Hastings et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828976 Banerjee et al. Nov 2010 B2
20010030160 Wechsler et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020003115 Conaway et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020017483 Chesner et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020030019 Keever et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020054783 Gueret May 2002 A1
20020088758 Blumenschein et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020158025 Streat Oct 2002 A1
20020170816 Leffler et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020185452 Johnson Dec 2002 A1
20020190004 Wechsler et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030082084 Cort May 2003 A1
20030089667 Binot et al. May 2003 A1
20030150817 Keever et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030222027 Streat Dec 2003 A1
20030224301 Howe et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040055959 Wechsler et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055961 Binot Mar 2004 A1
20040060876 Tipton Apr 2004 A1
20040129642 Binot Jul 2004 A1
20040144730 Binot et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040206680 Johnson Oct 2004 A1
20040213721 Arno et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050005471 Pan Jan 2005 A1
20050035030 Oder et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050045534 Kin et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050051488 Nagghappan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050101719 Ishihara May 2005 A1
20050103719 Binot et al. May 2005 A1
20050131266 Carman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050173354 Binot et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050194311 Rozich Sep 2005 A1
20050218056 Binot Oct 2005 A1
20050230299 Saho et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050258103 Cort Nov 2005 A1
20050271575 Ciampi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277712 Daly Dec 2005 A1
20050282144 Wechsler et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060006114 Deskins Jan 2006 A1
20060018273 Yamada et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060108273 Perri et al. May 2006 A1
20060108283 Johnson et al. May 2006 A1
20060138047 Morgoun Jun 2006 A1
20060175252 Upendrakumar et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060186056 Ivan Aug 2006 A1
20060213832 Hudson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060254770 Hou Nov 2006 A1
20060270888 Carman et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060289357 Wechsler et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070039894 Cort Feb 2007 A1
20070062883 Frederick et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070108132 de Guevara May 2007 A1
20070114184 Essemiani et al. May 2007 A1
20070138093 Bossler et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070163955 Sun Jul 2007 A1
20080019780 Hastings Jan 2008 A1
20080073267 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073268 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073270 Smith Mar 2008 A1
20080073271 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073278 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073279 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073280 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073281 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073282 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073283 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080073284 Cort Mar 2008 A1
20080078721 Binot et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080135491 Cort Jun 2008 A1
20080156709 Johnson Jul 2008 A1
20080164183 Marston et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164184 Marston et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080203015 Marston et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080210613 Wechsler et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080217244 Gaid Sep 2008 A1
20080257810 Sun Oct 2008 A1
20080272065 Johnson Nov 2008 A1
20080290030 Nagghappan et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080296228 Sauvignet et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080314820 Prulhiere et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080314830 Banerjee et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090047076 Hastings Feb 2009 A1
20090050570 Sauvignet Feb 2009 A1
20090065404 Paspek, Jr. et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084730 Mabille et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098262 Mabille et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090127180 Deskins May 2009 A1
20090178979 Hastings et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090206040 Berg et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090218281 Sauvignet et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090261037 Clifford et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090272693 Mabille et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090299143 Conlon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090301948 Essemiani et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308815 Sauvignet et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100038081 Gamache et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057085 Holcomb et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100072142 Lean et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100096335 Sauvignet et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100101309 Klyamkin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100102006 Quevillon Apr 2010 A1
20100155327 Woodard et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100213123 Marston et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100219372 Hook et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251571 Woodard Oct 2010 A1
20100274209 Roe et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110036771 Woodard Feb 2011 A1
20110147304 Sauvignet et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120067824 Berg et al. Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
19600647 Jul 1997 DE
12594 Jun 1980 EP
0087223 Aug 1983 EP
0139572 May 1985 EP
266098 May 1988 EP
392321 Oct 1990 EP
392322 Oct 1990 EP
1244601 Oct 2002 EP
1785400 May 2007 EP
2165980 Mar 2010 EP
1411792 Sep 1965 FR
2378550 Aug 1978 FR
2719235 Nov 1995 FR
07-299495 Nov 1995 JP
08-257583 Oct 1996 JP
11-169866 Jun 1999 JP
2000-233198 Aug 2000 JP
2001-170404 Jun 2001 JP
2003-010874 Jan 2003 JP
1136839 Jan 1985 SU
9312041 Jun 1993 WO
9735654 Oct 1997 WO
9735655 Oct 1997 WO
9803433 Jan 1998 WO
9919261 Apr 1999 WO
9931016 Jun 1999 WO
0114260 Mar 2001 WO
0128931 Apr 2001 WO
0140121 Jun 2001 WO
0200556 Jan 2002 WO
0242223 May 2002 WO
2005077835 Aug 2005 WO
2005087381 Sep 2005 WO
2006086384 Aug 2006 WO
2006102362 Sep 2006 WO
2007059141 May 2007 WO
2007098298 Aug 2007 WO
2008022192 Feb 2008 WO
2008039936 Apr 2008 WO
2008085196 Jul 2008 WO
2008085197 Jul 2008 WO
2008086009 Jul 2008 WO
2008086010 Jul 2008 WO
2009083346 Jul 2009 WO
2010027895 Mar 2010 WO
2010081903 Jul 2010 WO
2010086249 Aug 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Tozer, Hugh G., “Study of Five Phosphorus Removal Processes,” The Georgia Operator , vol. 45 No. 1 (Winter 2008).
www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wef/wefproc/2009/00002009/00000004/art0020 downloaded Dec. 16, 2012.
http://www.envirosim.com/includes/weftec08.htm downloaded Dec. 16, 2012.
Buchanan et al., “Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units,” University Curriculum Development for Decentralized Wastewater Management Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units Buchanan and Seabloom, p. i-v and 1-22, Nov. 2004, [Retrieved on Mar. 9, 2011].
Catlow et al. “Ballasted Biological Treatment Process Removes Nutrients and Doubles Plant Capacity”. WEFTEC Conference, (Oct. 2008).
Kolm et al., “High Gradient Magnetic Separation,” Scientific American, Nov. 1975, vol. 233, No. 5, 10 pages (unnumbered).
Lubenow et al. “Maximizing Nutrient Removal in an Existing SBR with a Full-Scale BioMag Demonstration”. WEFTEC Conference. Date Unknown.
Moody et al. “Beyond Desktop Evaluation: Key Design Criteria for Mixing and Settling of Magnetite-Impregnated Mixed Liquor”. WEFTEC Conference 2011.
Raskin et al., “Quantification of Methanogenic Groups in Anaerobic Biological Reactors by Oligonucleotide Probe Hybridization,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Apr. 1994, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1241-1248.
Sakai et al., “A Sewage Treatment Process Using Highly Condensed Activated Sludge with an Apparatus for Magnetic Separation,” 1994, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 120-122.
Sakai et al., “Magnetic Forced Sedimentation of Flocs in Activated Sludge Supplemented with Ferromagnetic Powder of Iron Oxide,” 1991, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 208-210.
Sakai et al., “Recovery and Reuse of Ferromagnetic Powder Supplemented in Activated Sludge for Magnetic Separation,” Dept. of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Utunsonomiya University, Japan, Submitted: Jun. 28, 1991; Accepted: Oct. 22, 1991, pp. 1-11. Japanese language original (pp. 52-56), and translated English language copy (pp. 1-11).
Sakai et al., “Sewage Treatment under Conditions of Balancing Microbial Growth and Cell Decay with a High Concentration of Activated Sludge Supplemented with Ferromagnetic Powder,” 1992, Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 413-315.
Sakai et al., “Simultaneous Removal of Organic and Nitrogen Compounds in Intermittently Aerated Activated Sludge Process Using Magnetic Separation,” 1997, Technical Note Wat. Res., vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 2113-2116.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130020254 A1 Jan 2013 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60879373 Jan 2007 US
60994553 Sep 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12799573 Apr 2010 US
Child 13627757 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12584545 Sep 2009 US
Child 12799573 US
Parent 12008216 Jan 2008 US
Child 12584545 US