The present invention relates to voltage references and in particular to voltage reference implemented using bandgap circuitry. The invention more particularly relates to a voltage reference circuit and a method which provides a reference voltage output that is independent of the process variations. Such a circuit is particularly advantageous in the provision of sub-bandgap voltage reference circuits.
A typical bandgap voltage reference circuit is based on addition of two voltages having equal and opposite temperature coefficients.
There are different approaches to trim a bandgap voltage reference. The first method is to trim the reference at a so called “magic” value. An example of how this trimming method is achieved is illustrated in
An alternative technique is to utilise two trimming steps, at two different temperatures. At a first temperature, say room temperature, the reference voltage is measured. But because Eg_0 changes from die to die, this value is always different from desired value. At a second temperature, usually a higher temperature, the reference is trimmed to the same value as it was at first temperature. To overcome this situation a third trimming is required by gaining the resulting reference voltage to the desired value. As a result when a lot of prior art voltage references are trimmed at two different temperatures, an expensive tracking procedure is required to identify the part from the lot and its corresponding voltage value.
An example of a known more detailed CMOS bandgap voltage reference is presented on
Here
This voltage has a typical slope between 0.2 mV/C to 0.4 mV/C and is usually amplified by a factor of 10 to 5 in order to balance the base-emitter voltage slope to generate the reference voltage as
The resistor ratio r2/r1 represents the gain factor for ΔVbe.
Such circuits based on a CMOS process generate a voltage having significant variations from die to die mainly due to MOS transistor offset voltages. It is also a noisy reference voltage as MOS transistors generate large noise, especially low frequency noise, compared to a bipolar based bandgap voltage reference. The main offset and noise contributor of the circuit according to
Another drawback of a circuit in this configuration is its poor Power Supply Rejection Ratio i.e. its ability to reject variation in the supply voltage.
A typical value of a bandgap voltage reference is about 1.25V. There is more demand for lower voltage references, such as 1V or 1.024V. These reference voltages are called “sub-bandgap” voltage references, as their value is less than a normally generated bandgap voltage reference.
One sub-bandgap voltage is described in “A CMOS Bandgap Reference Circuit with Sub-1-V Operation”, Banba et al. JSSC Vol. 34, No. 5, May 1999, pp 670-674. This circuit can be derived from that of
Although this teaches the provision of a sub-bandgap reference it suffers in that the reference voltage is not corrected for the “curvature” error, which as was mentioned above is inherently present in such circuits due to second order effects. As a result it cannot be trimmed for a temperature coefficient of less than 15 ppm due to this curvature error. A modified version of this sub-bandgap voltage reference is presented on “Curvature Compensated BiCMOS Bandgap with 1V Supply Voltage”, Malcovati et al., JSSC, Vol. 36, No. 7, July 2001.
Sub-bandgap voltage references such as those described in this publication are commonly denoted as “current mode” and are dependent on MOS transistors behaviour as the two components, PTAT and CTAT currents are separately generated and combined to generate the reference voltage across a resistor.
There are variants of “voltage mode” sub-bandgap voltage references based on adding fractions of base-emitter voltage to a corresponding PTAT component to generate temperature insensitive reference voltages. A sub-bandgap voltage reference is described in: “A low noise sub-bandgap voltage reference”, Sudha, M.; Holman, W. T.; Proceedings of the 40th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1997. Volume 1, 3-6 Aug. 1997 Page(s):193-196. This reference circuit generates a low reference voltage as a base-emitter voltage difference of two bipolar transistors operating at different current density. The base-emitter difference is subtracted via a resistor divider. As it stands this circuit cannot be implemented in a low cost CMOS process. In order to use the reference voltage this circuit has to be followed by a gain stage. Because the reference voltage value is about 200 mV usually it needs to be amplified to 1V or more. By amplifying the reference voltage the errors of both the reference circuit and the amplifier will increase in proportion to the gain factor. This is not ideal.
A curvature-corrected sub-bandgap voltage which can be implemented on a CMOS process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,253,597 to Paul Brokaw, co-assigned to the assignee of the present invention. This circuit based on a combination of two bipolar transistors, four resistors, an amplifier and three PMOS transistors and generates a constant current and a temperature independent voltage across a load resistor. As with other MOS variants this reference is also very much affected by offset and noise of MOS transistors.
A CMOS bandgap voltage reference was disclosed in “A method and a circuit for producing a PTAT voltage and a method and a circuit for producing a bandgap voltage reference” U.S. Pat. No. 7,193,454, co-assigned to the assignee of the present invention. In order to reduce offset and noise sensitivity due to MOS current mirrors, this circuit is based on a combination of two amplifiers, the first generating an inverse PTAT voltage and the second generating a reference voltage by mixing a base-emitter voltage of a bipolar transistor and the output voltage of the first amplifier. This circuit offers a low offset voltage and does not suffer from noise sensitivity arising from MOS current mirrors but suffers in that these benefits are achieved by increasing the circuit complexity.
Due to these and other disadvantages associated with the prior art there is a requirement for a bandgap voltage reference that may be implemented using a single amplifier.
These and other problems associated with the prior art are addressed by a bandgap voltage reference in accordance with the teachings of the invention. Such a circuit is based on the generation of a PTAT component which can be used to eliminate the slope of the CTAT component yet does not contribute to the absolute value of the resultant reference output.
A circuit in accordance with the teaching of the invention provides a first set of circuit elements whose output below a first temperature is a PTAT output of a first polarity and above that first temperature is a PTAT output of a second polarity. By judiciously selecting the temperature at which the PTAT output changes polarity the contribution of the PTAT output to the overall value of the reference can be minimized.
These and other features of the invention will be understood with reference to the exemplary embodiments which follow.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The prior art has been described with reference to
The present invention addresses the problem of the prior art arrangements by reducing the number of unknown variables in the circuit in order to provide a more accurate voltage reference which is not dependant on process variations.
It will be understood from an examination of
It will be further understood that the point of crossover of the PTAT is used to select the absolute value of the CTAT voltage that will form the basis of the reference output. Unless the crossover point is absolute zero, this CTAT value will be less than a bandgap voltage. Unless this value is then amplified or scaled in some other fashion the resultant reference voltage will be a value less than a bandgap voltage, i.e. a sub-bandgap voltage reference.
1) First, for S1 open and S2 closed the output voltage of the amplifier is measured. The corresponding voltage will be the reference voltage. If this value is different from the desired value the current I1 is to be adjusted accordingly.
2) Second, S1 is closed and S2 is open and I2 is trimmed to zero such that the reference voltage value remains the desired value. At this stage the reference is trimmed only for absolute value. For temperature coefficient (TC) with S1 closed and S2 is open, the reference voltage is trimmed at a different temperature, usually higher by trimming Rf until the reference voltage remains the desired voltage. As the reference voltage variation vs. temperature is a straight line with two equal values at different temperatures the reference is temperature insensitive.
A very important feature of this reference circuit is that it is no longer dependent on the process used to fabricate the components of the circuit. The desired output value is under control as compared to the typical bandgap voltage reference, described previously with reference to the Background, which is based on summation of two voltages with opposite TC where the “magic” voltage is out of control.
It will be appreciated that the teaching of the invention overcomes the problem of the two unknown parameters which was present in the prior art arrangement by forcing Vbe of the diode to a desired value that is process independent and then using that value as the determining value for the remainder of the calibration steps. The desired voltage reference can either be a base-emitter voltage, a gained replica or an attenuated replica of this voltage.
It will be understood that the circuit and methodology rely on the provision of a shifted PTAT voltage or current. There are different arrangements or configurations that could be used to generate a shifted PTAT current through the feedback resistor of
As the voltage at the node “a” is related to the base emitter voltage of transistor Q1, it will be understood that the presence of a single resistor Q1 at the non-inverting node results in a sub-bandgap voltage being generated at this node.
The second set of circuit elements which provide the remainder of the circuit, are designed to generate a desired or buffered reference voltage from the output of the first set of circuit elements taken from node “a”. This buffered output at a node “ref” is generated by circuit components including an amplifier A2 and three resistors, r5, r6, r7, where r5 and r7 are fixed resistors and r6 is a variable resistor, all provided in a negative feedback configuration coupled to the inverting node of amplifier A2. The node “a” is coupled to the non-inverting node. A logic signal C will allow for the operation of the circuit in “test” mode, for C=1, when S1 is open and S2 is closed and in “normal” mode, for C=0, when S1 is closed and S2 is open. It will be understood that the trimming of resistor r6 may be used to scale the amplification of the output of the first set of circuit elements but that alternatively the emitter of Q1 could be forced to a desired value by replacing current source I1 with a variable current source—similar to what was shown in
Examples of the types of circuitry that may be used to provide the PTAT and CTAT current generators are well known to those skilled in the art.
The sub-bandgap voltage reference output is a combination of the base-emitter voltage of Q1, plus the voltage drop across the feedback resistors from the inverting node of A1 to the tapping node, “a”.
The base-emitter voltage of a bipolar transistor has a temperature variation according to (3):
Here VG0 is base-emitter voltage at 0K, which is of the order of 1.2V; Vbe0 is base-emitter voltage at room temperature; σ is the saturation current temperature exponent; Ic is the collector current at temperature T and Ic0 is the same current at a reference temperature T0. The first two terms in (3) show a linear drop in temperature and the last two a nonlinear variation which is usually called “curvature” voltage. The two curvature terms can be combined in a single one, depending on the temperature variation of the collector current.
Assuming that the collector currents of Q1 and Q2 are PTAT currents of the same value and collector current of Q3 is a CTAT current having at room temperature (T0) the same value as Q1 and Q2 then the base-emitter voltages for the three bipolar transistors are:
Here Vbe10, Vbe20, Vbe30, are the corresponding base-emitter voltage at reference or room temperature, T0, and c is an approximation coefficient equal to zero for constant current, −1, for PTAT current as (4) and (5) show, and about 0.8 for CTAT current.
As Q2 and Q3 have n times larger emitter area compared to Q1 at T0, the base-emitter voltage differences are:
At temperature T0 the feedback current is forced to zero by trimming r3. As a result the voltage at the sub-bandgap voltage reference is Vbe10. This condition sets up the ratio of r3 to r1 as equation (8) shows:
The sub-bandgap voltage reference is:
Where A is the bandgap voltage multiplication coefficient, B is temperature linear coefficient and D is “curvature” coefficient. These coefficients are:
In order to force a reference voltage temperature insensitive, B has to be set to zero. From (8) and (11) for B=0 we get:
The ratio of r2 to r3 can be found from (8) and (13):
For a submicron CMOS process Vg0 is about 1.205V; the base-emitter voltage of a forward biased bipolar transistor at room temperature is about Vbe10=0.7V; a typical ΔVbe0 voltage at room temperature is about 0.1V; typical value for σ is 3.8.
For these values the resistor's ratios are:
Also the coefficient “c” for D=0, (12), is c=0.9, which indicates the right choice for biasing Q3 with CTAT current in order to compensate for “curvature” error. In this way it will be understood that the voltage output includes an inherent curvature correction element.
While implementations have been described heretofore with reference to the generation of sub-bandgap voltage references it will be understood that the teaching of the invention can be also used for bandgap references where it is desired to provide an output which is based on the combination of known parameters.
Such an arrangement is shown in
Another way to generate the multiple bandgap voltage at node “a” is shown In
The circuit of
As the simulation shows the reference voltage has a variation of about 83 uV for the industrial temperature range (−40 C to 85 c) which corresponds to a temperature coefficient (TC) of less than 1 ppm/C degree.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, a buffered reference voltage with a desired value will be provided at the “ref” node by trimming r6 so as to achieve the desired value, or as mentioned above by forcing the emitter of Q1 to a desired value.
As the impedance through the two 1/gm resistors is less than that through r1, the noise current, in0, is mainly dumped to ground via the two 1/gm resistors in series with a corresponding value of more than ten times r1. Assuming at room temperature the currents through r1 and Q2 and Q3 having the same value then the ratio of the current injected into the amplifier's non-inverting node, in1, to the total noise current in0 is:
Here Vt0 is kT0/q, or thermal voltage, of 26 mV at T=300K. As Equation (16) shows more than 90% of the noise injected from PMOS mirrors is dumped to ground through Q2 and Q3 and less than 10% is diverted to the amplifier's inverting node such that the reference voltage is desensitized to the supply voltage variation and current mirrors mismatches and noise.
The advantages of the bandgap voltage references according to
It will be understood that what has been described herein is a circuit and methodology that provides a voltage reference whose output is independent of process variations. By providing circuitry that generates a PTAT voltage whose output at a preselected temperature can be chosen to be zero it is possible to reduce the number of unknown parameters that are used in generation of bandgap voltage references.
A bandgap voltage reference circuit according to the teaching of the invention includes a PTAT source whose polarity reverses at a determinable temperature. The PTAT source is combined with a CTAT source in a manner to remove the effects of the slope of the CTAT source such that a voltage reference may be generated.
It will be appreciated that another advantage provided by the methodology of the present invention arises from the fact that according to the teaching of the present invention, the reference voltage target is always the desired value at any trimming step as compared to the prior art arrangements where the voltage is changed from one step to another because TC and absolute value interact.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments it will be understood that these are provided for an understanding of the teaching of the invention and it is not intended to limit the invention in any way except as may be deemed necessary in the light of the appended claims. In this way modifications can be made to each of the Figures, and components described with reference to one embodiment can be interchanged with those of another without departing from the spirit and/or scope of the invention.
The words comprises/comprising when used in this specification are to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components or groups thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4399398 | Wittlinger | Aug 1983 | A |
4475103 | Brokaw et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4603291 | Nelson | Jul 1986 | A |
4714872 | Traa | Dec 1987 | A |
4800339 | Tanimoto et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808908 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4939442 | Carvajal et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5053640 | Yum | Oct 1991 | A |
5119015 | Watanabe | Jun 1992 | A |
5229711 | Inoue | Jul 1993 | A |
5325045 | Sundby | Jun 1994 | A |
5352973 | Audy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371032 | Nishihara | Dec 1994 | A |
5424628 | Nguyen | Jun 1995 | A |
5512817 | Nagaraj | Apr 1996 | A |
5563504 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5646518 | Lakshmikumar et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5821807 | Brooks | Oct 1998 | A |
5828329 | Burns | Oct 1998 | A |
5933045 | Audy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952873 | Rincon-Mora | Sep 1999 | A |
5982201 | Brokaw et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002293 | Brokaw | Dec 1999 | A |
6075354 | Smith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6157245 | Rincon-Mora | Dec 2000 | A |
6218822 | MacQuigg | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225796 | Nguyen | May 2001 | B1 |
6255807 | Doorenbos et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6329804 | Mercer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329868 | Furman | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356161 | Nolan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362612 | Harris | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373330 | Holloway | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6426669 | Friedman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6462625 | Kim | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6483372 | Bowers | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489787 | McFadden | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6489835 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501256 | Jaussi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529066 | Guenot et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531857 | Ju | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6549072 | Vernon | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6590372 | Wiles, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614209 | Gregoire, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6642699 | Gregoire, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661713 | Kuo | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664847 | Ye | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690228 | Chen et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6791307 | Harrison | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798286 | Dauphinee et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801095 | Renninger, II | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6828847 | Marinca | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836160 | Li | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6853238 | Dempsey et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6885178 | Marinca | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891358 | Marinca | May 2005 | B2 |
6894544 | Gubbins | May 2005 | B2 |
6919753 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6930538 | Chatal | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958643 | Rosenthal | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6987416 | Ker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992533 | Hollinger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7012416 | Marinca | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7057444 | Illegems | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068100 | Dauphinee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7088085 | Marinca | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091761 | Stark et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112948 | Daly et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7170336 | Hsu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173407 | Marinca | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7193454 | Marinca | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7199646 | Zupcau et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7211993 | Marinca | May 2007 | B2 |
7224210 | Garlapati et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236047 | Tachibana et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248098 | Teo | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7260377 | Burns et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7301321 | Uang et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7372244 | Marinca | May 2008 | B2 |
7411380 | Chang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7472030 | Scheuerlein | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7482798 | Han | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20030234638 | Eshraghi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050073290 | Marinca et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050194957 | Brokaw | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237045 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060017457 | Pan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038608 | Ozawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070176591 | Kimura | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080018319 | Chang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074172 | Marinca | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080224759 | Marinca | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080265860 | Dempsey et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0510530 | Oct 1992 | EP |
1359490 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1359490 | Nov 2003 | EP |
4-167010 | Jun 1992 | JP |
0115143 | Dec 2007 | KR |
WO 200407719 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080074172 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |