Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9368099
  • Patent Number
    9,368,099
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 28, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 14, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A personal audio device, such as a wireless telephone, includes noise canceling circuit that adaptively generates an anti-noise signal from a reference microphone signal and injects the anti-noise signal into the speaker or other transducer output to cause cancellation of ambient audio sounds. An error microphone may also be provided proximate the speaker to measure the output of the transducer in order to control the adaptation of the anti-noise signal and to estimate an electro-acoustical path from the noise canceling circuit through the transducer. A processing circuit that performs the adaptive noise canceling (ANC) function also either adjusts the frequency response of the anti-noise signal with respect to the reference microphone signal, and/or by adjusting the response of the adaptive filter independent of the adaptation provided by the reference microphone signal.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to personal audio devices such as wireless telephones that include noise cancellation, and more specifically, to a personal audio device in which the anti-noise signal is band-limited to make the ANC operation more effective.


2. Background of the Invention


Wireless telephones, such as mobile/cellular telephones, cordless telephones, and other consumer audio devices, such as MP3 players and headphones or earbuds, are in widespread use. Performance of such devices with respect to intelligibility can be improved by providing noise canceling using a microphone to measure ambient acoustic events and then using signal processing to insert an anti-noise signal into the output of the device to cancel the ambient acoustic events.


Since the acoustic environment around personal audio devices such as wireless telephones can change dramatically, depending on the sources of noise that are present and the position of the device itself, it is desirable to adapt the noise canceling to take into account such environmental changes. However, adaptive noise canceling circuits can be complex, consume additional power and can generate undesirable results under certain circumstances.


Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a personal audio device, including a wireless telephone that provides noise cancellation in a variable acoustic environment.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The above stated objective of providing a personal audio device providing noise cancellation in a variable acoustic environment, is accomplished in a personal audio device, a method of operation, and an integrated circuit. The method is a method of operation of the personal audio device and the integrated circuit, which can be incorporated within the personal audio device.


The personal audio device includes a housing, with a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal that includes both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer. A reference microphone is mounted on the housing to provide a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds. The personal audio device further includes an adaptive noise-canceling (ANC) processing circuit within the housing for adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal such that the anti-noise signal causes substantial cancellation of the ambient audio sounds. An error microphone is included for controlling the adaptation of the anti-noise signal to cancel the ambient audio sounds and for correcting for the electro-acoustic path from the output of the processing circuit through the transducer. The ANC processing circuit avoids generating anti-noise that is disruptive, ineffective or that compromises performance in certain frequency ranges by shaping a frequency response of the anti-noise to the reference microphone signal and/or by adjusting a response of the adaptive filter independent of the adaptive control with respect to the reference microphone signal.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a wireless telephone 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of circuits within wireless telephone 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 3A-3E are block diagrams depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks within ANC circuit 30 of CODEC integrated circuit 20 of FIG. 2 in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B are block diagrams depicting signal processing circuits and functional blocks within integrated circuits in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

The present invention encompasses noise canceling techniques and circuits that can be implemented in a personal audio device, such as a wireless telephone. The personal audio device includes an adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuit that measures the ambient acoustic environment and generates an adaptive anti-noise signal that is injected in the speaker (or other transducer) output to cancel ambient acoustic events. A reference microphone is provided to measure the ambient acoustic environment and an error microphone is be included to control adaptation of the anti-noise signal to cancel the ambient acoustic events and to provide estimation of an electro-acoustical path from the output of the ANC circuit through the speaker. The ANC processing circuit avoids generating anti-noise that is disruptive, ineffective or that compromises performance in certain frequency ranges by shaping a frequency response of the anti-noise to the reference microphone signal and/or by adjusting a response of the adaptive filter independent of the adaptive control with respect to the error microphone signal.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a wireless telephone 10 is illustrated in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is shown in proximity to a human ear 5. Illustrated wireless telephone 10 is an example of a device in which techniques in accordance with embodiments of the invention may be employed, but it is understood that not all of the elements or configurations embodied in illustrated wireless telephone 10, or in the circuits depicted in subsequent illustrations, are required in order to practice the invention recited in the Claims. Wireless telephone 10 includes a transducer such as speaker SPKR that reproduces distant speech received by wireless telephone 10, along with other local audio event such as ringtones, stored audio program material, injection of near-end speech (i.e., the speech of the user of wireless telephone 10) to provide a balanced conversational perception, and other audio that requires reproduction by wireless telephone 10, such as sources from web-pages or other network communications received by wireless telephone 10 and audio indications such as battery low and other system event notifications. A near-speech microphone NS is provided to capture near-end speech, which is transmitted from wireless telephone 10 to the other conversation participant(s).


Wireless telephone 10 includes adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuits and features that inject an anti-noise signal into speaker SPKR to improve intelligibility of the distant speech and other audio reproduced by speaker SPKR. A reference microphone R is provided for measuring the ambient acoustic environment, and is positioned away from the typical position of a user's mouth, so that the near-end speech is minimized in the signal produced by reference microphone R. A third microphone, error microphone E is provided in order to further improve the ANC operation by providing a measure of the ambient audio combined with the audio reproduced by speaker SPKR close to ear 5 at an error microphone reference position ERP, when wireless telephone 10 is in close proximity to ear 5. Exemplary circuits 14 within wireless telephone 10 include an audio CODEC integrated circuit 20 that receives the signals from reference microphone R, near speech microphone NS and error microphone E and interfaces with other integrated circuits such as an RF integrated circuit 12 containing the wireless telephone transceiver. In other embodiments of the invention, the circuits and techniques disclosed herein may be incorporated in a single integrated circuit that contains control circuits and other functionality for implementing the entirety of the personal audio device, such as an MP3 player-on-a-chip integrated circuit.


In general, the ANC techniques of the present invention measure ambient acoustic events (as opposed to the output of speaker SPKR and/or the near-end speech) impinging on reference microphone R, and by also measuring the same ambient acoustic events impinging on error microphone E, the ANC processing circuits of illustrated wireless telephone 10 adapt an anti-noise signal generated from the output of reference microphone R to have a characteristic that minimizes the amplitude of the ambient acoustic events at error microphone E, i.e. at error microphone reference position ERP. Since acoustic path P(z) extends from reference microphone R to error microphone E, the ANC circuits are essentially estimating acoustic path P(z) combined with removing effects of an electro-acoustic path S(z) that represents the response of the audio output circuits of CODEC IC 20 and the acoustic/electric transfer function of speaker SPKR including the coupling between speaker SPKR and error microphone E in the particular acoustic environment, which is affected by the proximity and structure of ear 5 and other physical objects and human head structures that may be in proximity to wireless telephone 10, when wireless telephone is not firmly pressed to ear 5. Since the user of wireless telephone 10 actually hears the output of speaker SPKR at a drum reference position DRP, differences between the signal produced by error microphone E and what is actually heard by the user are shaped by the response of the ear canal, as well as the spatial distance between error microphone reference position ERP and drum reference position DRP. At higher frequencies, the spatial differences lead to multi-path nulls that reduce the effectiveness of the ANC system, and in some cases may increase ambient noise. While the illustrated wireless telephone 10 includes a two microphone ANC system with a third near speech microphone NS, some aspects of the present invention may be practiced in a system that does not include separate error and reference microphones, or a wireless telephone uses near speech microphone NS to perform the function of the reference microphone R. Also, in personal audio devices designed only for audio playback, near speech microphone NS will generally not be included, and the near-speech signal paths in the circuits described in further detail below can be omitted, without changing the scope of the invention.


Referring now to FIG. 2, circuits within wireless telephone 10 are shown in a block diagram. CODEC integrated circuit 20 includes an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 21A for receiving the reference microphone signal and generating a digital representation ref of the reference microphone signal, an ADC 21B for receiving the error microphone signal and generating a digital representation err of the error microphone signal, and an ADC 21C for receiving the near speech microphone signal and generating a digital representation ns of the near speech microphone signal. CODEC IC 20 generates an output for driving speaker SPKR from an amplifier A1, which amplifies the output of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 23 that receives the output of a combiner 26. Combiner 26 combines audio signals is from internal audio sources 24, the anti-noise signal generated by ANC circuit 30, which by convention has the same polarity as the noise in reference microphone signal ref and is therefore subtracted by combiner 26, a portion of near speech microphone signal ns so that the user of wireless telephone 10 hears their own voice in proper relation to downlink speech ds, which is received from radio frequency (RF) integrated circuit 22 and is also combined by combiner 26. Near speech microphone signal ns is also provided to RF integrated circuit 22 and is transmitted as uplink speech to the service provider via antenna ANT.


Referring now to FIG. 3A, details of an ANC circuit 30A are shown in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention that may be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. Adaptive filter 32 receives reference microphone signal ref and under ideal circumstances, adapts its transfer function W(z) to be P(z)/S(z) to generate the anti-noise signal. The coefficients of adaptive filter 32 are controlled by a W coefficient control block 31 that uses a correlation of two signals to determine the response of adaptive filter 32, which generally minimizes, in a least-mean squares sense, those components of reference microphone signal ref that are present in error microphone signal err. The signals provided as inputs to W coefficient control block 31 are the reference microphone signal ref as shaped by a copy of an estimate of the response of path S(z) provided by filter 34B and another signal provided from the output of a combiner 36 that includes error microphone signal err. By transforming reference microphone signal ref with a copy of the estimate of the response of path S(z), SECOPY(z), and minimizing the portion of the error signal that correlates with components of reference microphone signal ref, adaptive filter 32 adapts to the desired response of P(z)/S(z). A filter 37A that has a response Cx(z) as explained in further detail below, processes the output of filter 34B and provides the first input to W coefficient control block 31. The second input to W coefficient control block 31 is processed by another filter 37B having a response of Ce(z). Response Ce(z) has a phase response matched to response Cx(z) of filter 37A. The input to filter 37B includes error microphone signal err and an inverted amount of downlink audio signal ds that has been processed by filter response SE(z), of which response SECOPY(z) is a copy. Combiner 36 combines error microphone signal err and the inverted downlink audio signal ds. By injecting an inverted amount of downlink audio signal ds adaptive filter 32 is prevented from adapting to the relatively large amount of downlink audio present in error microphone signal err and by transforming that inverted copy of downlink audio signal ds with the estimate of the response of path S(z), the downlink audio that is removed from error microphone signal err before comparison should match the expected version of downlink audio signal ds reproduced at error microphone signal err, since the electrical and acoustical path of S(z) is the path taken by downlink audio signal ds to arrive at error microphone E.


To implement the above, adaptive filter 34A has coefficients controlled by SE coefficient control block 33, which updates based on correlated components of downlink audio signal ds and an error value. The error value represents error microphone signal err after removal of the above-described filtered downlink audio signal ds, which has been previously filtered by adaptive filter 34A to represent the expected downlink audio delivered to error microphone E. The filtered version of downlink audio signal ds is removed from the output of adaptive filter 34A by combiner 36. SE coefficient control block 33 correlates the actual downlink speech signal ds with the components of downlink audio signal ds that are present in error microphone signal err. Adaptive filter 34A is thereby adapted to generate a signal from downlink audio signal ds, that when subtracted from error microphone signal err, contains the content of error microphone signal err that is not due to downlink audio signal ds.


Under certain circumstances, the anti-noise signal provided from adaptive filter 32 may contain more energy at certain frequencies due to ambient sounds at other frequencies, because W coefficient control block 31 has adjusted the frequency response of adaptive filter 32 to suppress the more energetic signals, while allowing the gain of other regions of the frequency response of adaptive filter 32 to rise, leading to a boost of the ambient noise, or “noise boost”, in the other regions of the frequency response. In particular, noise boost is problematic when coefficient control block 31 has adjusted the frequency response of adaptive filter 32 to suppress more energetic signals in higher frequency ranges, e.g., between 2 kHz and 5 kHz, where multi-path nulls in paths P(z) and S(z) generally arise and the frequency response of the canal of the user's ear 5, starts to contribute to the overall operation of the ANC system as perceived by the listener. Since the phase of the anti-noise signal may not match the phase of the ambient audio sounds at drum reference position DRP in these upper frequency ranges, the anti-noise signal may actually increase noise perceived by the listener, and noise boost may compound the problem. Therefore, ANC circuit 30A includes an additional infinite impulse response (IIR) filter 39 to filter the anti-noise signal before the anti-noise signal is combined with downlink speech ds and sent to speaker SPKR. Filter 39 may alternatively be another type of filter such as a finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Filter 39 may be a low-pass filter that passes only generated anti-noise below a certain frequency, e.g., 2 kHz, or alternatively, filter 39 may be a notch filter that suppresses a particular problem frequency, e.g., a known frequency at which a multi-path null is present due to the acoustical length of path P(z) so that the phase of the anti-noise signal is incorrect. In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, filter 39 may be a high-pass filter that removes problematic low-frequency anti-noise components, or filter 39 may be a bandpass filter. Filter 39 removes the anti-noise either above the cut-off frequency of filter 39 when a low-pass filter response is used, below the cut-off frequency of filter 39 when a high-pass filter is used, removes the region of problem frequencies when a notch filter response is used, or removes both low and high ranges outside of a passband when a bandpass filter is used. The notch filter response could also include multiple nulls, in order to shape the frequencies present in the anti-noise signal to remove problem spot frequencies. ANC circuit 30A of FIG. 3A is an example of a circuit that adjusts the frequency response of the anti-noise signal with respect to reference microphone signal ref. In order to preserve stability in the output of W coefficient control 31, response Cx(z) of filter 37A includes a copy of the response of filter 39. A low-pass characteristic is provided in each of filters 37A and 37B so that the action of W coefficient control 31 does not attempt to counteract the processing performed by filter 39 by adapting response W(z) of adaptive filter 32.


Referring now to FIG. 3B, details of another ANC circuit 30B are shown in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention that may be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. ANC circuit 30B is similar to ANC circuit 30A of FIG. 3A, so only differences between them will be described below. In ANC circuit 30B, the anti-noise output of adaptive filter 32 is filtered, while allowing W coefficient control block 31 to adapt just as the anti-noise signal was not filtered, a first notch filter 39A removes certain frequencies from the anti-noise signal, but a second all-pass filter 39B having a phase response matching the phase response of notch filter 39A is provided to also filter the anti-noise signal. A combiner 36A subtracts the output of notch filter 39A from the output of all-pass filter 39B to generate a signal that represents the information removed from the anti-noise signal by notch filter 39A. The output of combiner 36A is then combined with downlink speech ds before downlink speech ds is provided to filter 34A, preventing the response of notch filter 39A from appearing in the output of combiner 36, since the output of combiner 36A as processed by filter 34A is ideally equal to the change in error microphone signal err due to the presence of notch filter 39A. Reference microphone signal ref is also processed by a notch filter 39C having a copy of the response of N′(z) before processing by filter 34B. The above-described circuit effectively hides the amplitude response of filter 39A from both error microphone signal err and from reference microphone signal ref inputs to W coefficient control block 31, so that W coefficient control circuit 31 does not attempt to adapt the coefficients of adaptive filter 32 to cancel the response of filter 39A, which may be a notch, as described above, or which may be another filter type, such as the low-pass or high-pass filter described above with reference to FIG. 3A.


Referring now to FIG. 3C, details of another ANC circuit 30C are shown in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention that may be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. ANC circuit 30C is similar to ANC circuit 30A of FIG. 3A, so only differences between them will be described below. In ANC circuit 30C, rather than employing an adaptive filter for W(z) in which the entire response is controlled by W coefficient control 31, in ANC circuit 30C, the response of the filter implementing W(z) has only a single gain tap. W coefficient control circuit 31 controls the gain of the anti-noise signal via gain block 35, while the remainder of W(z) is provided by a fixed response filter 32A that implements response WFIXED(z), which is generally a response adapted to the particular design of the personal audio device in a typical acoustic environment. Since the low-frequency gain of W(z) and SE(z) are the components that vary the most due to positioning with respect to the source of acoustic noise and the proximity/pressure of the phone to the ear, providing an adaptive filter with only a gain control for W(z) can prevent introduction of noise boost, since the amplitude response of filter 32A can be very low for other frequencies.


Referring now to FIG. 3D, details of another ANC circuit 30D are shown in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention that may be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. ANC circuit 30D is similar to ANC circuit 30C of FIG. 3C, so only differences between them will be described below. In ANC circuit 30D, rather than employing a fixed filter for W(z) and only adaptively adjusting the gain applied to the anti-noise signal, in ANC circuit 30D, a fixed response WFIXED(x) is provided by filter 32A and an adaptive portion of the response WADAPT(z) is provided by adaptive filter 32B, and the outputs of filters 32A and 32B are combined by combiner 36B to provide a total response that has a fixed and an adaptive portion. W coefficient control block 31A has a leaky response, i.e., the response is time-variant such that the response tends over time to a flat frequency response or another predetermined initial frequency response, so that any adaptive change is stabilized by undoing the adaptive change over time.


Referring now to FIG. 3E, details of another ANC circuit 30E are shown in accordance with another alternative embodiment of the present invention that may be used to implement ANC circuit 30 of FIG. 2. ANC circuit 30E is similar to ANC circuit 30B of FIG. 3B, so only differences between them will be described below. Rather than removing frequencies from the anti-noise signal using a separate filter as in ANC circuit 30B of FIG. 3B, ANC circuit 30E injects a noise signal noise(z) using a noise generator 37 that is supplied to a copy WCOPY(z) of the response W(z) of adaptive filter 32 provided by an adaptive filter 32C. A combiner 36C adds noise signal noise(z) to the output of adaptive filter 34B that is provided to W coefficient control 31. Noise signal n(z), as shaped by filter 32C, is subtracted from the output of combiner 36 by a combiner 36D so that noise signal n(z) is asymmetrically added to the correlation inputs to W coefficient control 31, with the result that the response W(z) of adaptive filter 32 is biased by the completely correlated injection of noise signal n(z) to each correlation input to W coefficient control 31. Since the injected noise appears directly at the reference input to W coefficient control 31, does not appear in error microphone signal err, and only appears at the other input to W coefficient control 31 via the combining of the filtered noise at the output of filter 32C by combiner 36D, W coefficient control will adapt W(z) to attenuate the frequencies present in noise(z). The content of noise signal n(z) does not appear in the anti-noise signal, only in the response W(z) of adaptive filter 32 which will have amplitude decreases at the frequencies/bands in which noise signal n(z) has energy. For example, if it is desirable to decrease the response of W(z) in the vicinity of 1 kHz, noise(z) can be generated to have a spectrum that has energy at 1 kHz, which will cause W coefficient control 31 to decrease the gain of adaptive filter 32 at 1 kHz in an attempt to cancel the apparent source of ambient acoustic sound due to injected noise signal noise(z).


Referring now to FIG. 4A, a block diagram of an ANC system is shown for illustrating ANC techniques in accordance with the embodiments of the invention as illustrated in FIGS. 3A-3D, as may be implemented within CODEC integrated circuit 20. Reference microphone signal ref is generated by a delta-sigma ADC 41A that operates at 64 times oversampling and the output of which is decimated by a factor of two by a decimator 42A to yield a 32 times oversampled signal. A delta-sigma shaper 43A spreads the energy of images outside of bands in which a resultant response of a parallel pair of filter stages 44A and 44B will have significant response. Filter stage 44B has a fixed response WFIXED(z) that is generally predetermined to provide a starting point at the estimate of P(z)/S(z) for the particular design of wireless telephone 10 for a typical user. An adaptive portion WADAPT(z) of the response of the estimate of P(z)/S(z) is provided by adaptive filter stage 44A, which is controlled by a leaky least-means-squared (LMS) coefficient controller 54A. Leaky LMS coefficient controller 54A is leaky in that the response normalizes to flat or otherwise predetermined response over time when no error input is provided to cause leaky LMS coefficient controller 54A to adapt. Providing a leaky controller prevents long-term instabilities that might arise under certain environmental conditions, and in general makes the system more robust against particular sensitivities of the ANC response. Since LMS coefficient controller 54A has a leaky response, the embodiment of the invention as illustrated in FIG. 3D is included in the system of FIG. 4A. Further, if adaptive filter stage 44A includes only a single gain tap, then the embodiment of the invention as illustrated in FIG. 3C is essentially included in the system of FIG. 4A. Although fixed-response filter 44B in FIG. 4A is arranged in a different circuit arrangement than fixed response filter 32A in FIG. 3C, since the only adaptive portion of the response is either the gain of amplifier 35 or a single tap provided in adaptive filter stage 44A, the adapting of W(z) will occur (and be constrained) in an equivalent manner. Alternatively, or in combination, a notch, low-pass or high-pass filter 39A can be optionally included to filter the anti-noise signal at the output of combiner 46A, as in the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B, and all-pass filter 39B and combiner 46F can provide a difference signal that can be added by a combiner 46G to the output of combiner 46D prior to its introduction to filters 55A,55B as in the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIG. 3B. Filter 39C is added between the output of delta-sigma shaper 43A and the input to filter 51 when filter 39A is present, so that leaky LMS 54A does not attempt to remove the response of filter 39A from the anti-noise signal by adaptation.


As in the systems of FIGS. 3A-3D, in the system depicted in FIG. 4A, the reference microphone signal is filtered by a copy SECOPY(z) of the estimate of the response of path S(z), by a filter 51 that has a response SECOPY(z), the output of which is decimated by a factor of 32 by a decimator 52A to yield a baseband audio signal that is provided, through an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter 53A to leaky LMS 54A. The error microphone signal err is generated by a delta-sigma ADC 41C that operates at 64 times oversampling and the output of which is decimated by a factor of two by a decimator 42B to yield a 32 times oversampled signal. As in the systems of FIGS. 3A-3D, an amount of downlink audio ds that has been filtered by an adaptive filter to apply response S(z) is removed from error microphone signal err by a combiner 46C, the output of which is decimated by a factor of 32 by a decimator 52C to yield a baseband audio signal that is provided, through an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter 53B to leaky LMS 54A. Response S(z) is produced by another parallel set of filter stages 55A and 55B, one of which, filter stage 55B has fixed response SEFIXED(z), and the other of which, filter stage 55A has an adaptive response SEADAPT(z) controlled by leaky LMS coefficient controller MB. The outputs of filter stages 55A and 55B are combined by a combiner 46E. Similar to the implementation of filter response W(z) described above, response SEFIXED(z) is generally a predetermined response known to provide a suitable starting point under various operating conditions for electrical/acoustical path S(z). A separate control value is provided in the system of FIG. 4A to control filter 51, which is shown as a single filter stage. However, filter 51 could alternatively be implemented using two parallel stages and the same control value used to control adaptive filter stage 55A could then be used to control the adaptive stage in the implementation of filter 51. The inputs to leaky LMS control block 54B are also at baseband, provided by decimating a combination of downlink audio signal ds and internal audio ia, generated by a combiner 46H, by a decimator 52B that decimates by a factor of 32 after a combiner 46C has removed the signal generated from the combined outputs of adaptive filter stage 55A and filter stage 55B that are combined by another combiner 46E. The output of combiner 46C represents error microphone signal err with the components due to downlink audio signal ds removed, which is provided to LMS control block 54B after decimation by decimator 52C. The other input to LMS control block 54B is the baseband signal produced by decimator 52B.


The above arrangement of baseband and oversampled signaling provides for simplified control and reduced power consumed in the adaptive control blocks, such as leaky LMS controllers 54A and 54B, while providing the tap flexibility afforded by implementing adaptive filter stages 44A-44B, 55A-55B and adaptive filter 51 at the oversampled rates. The remainder of the system of FIG. 4A includes combiner 46H that combines downlink audio ds with internal audio ia, the output of which is provided to the input of a combiner 46D that adds a portion of near-end microphone signal ns that has been generated by sigma-delta ADC 41B and filtered by a sidetone attenuator 56 to prevent feedback conditions. The output of combiner 46D is shaped by a sigma-delta shaper 43B that provides inputs to filter stages 55A and 55B that has been shaped to shift images outside of bands where filter stages 55A and 55B will have significant response.


In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the output of combiner 46D is also combined with the output of adaptive filter stages 44A-44B that have been processed by a control chain that includes a corresponding hard mute block 45A, 45B for each of the filter stages, a combiner 46A that combines the outputs of hard mute blocks 45A, 45B, a soft mute 47 and then a soft limiter 48 to produce the anti-noise signal that is subtracted by a combiner 46B with the source audio output of combiner 46D. The output of combiner 46B is interpolated up by a factor of two by an interpolator 49 and then reproduced by a sigma-delta DAC 50 operated at the 64× oversampling rate. The output of DAC 50 is provided to amplifier A1, which generates the signal delivered to speaker SPKR.


Referring now to FIG. 4B, a block diagram of another ANC system is shown for illustrating ANC techniques in accordance with the embodiment of the invention as illustrated in FIG. 3E, as may be implemented within CODEC integrated circuit 20. The ANC system of FIG. 4B is similar to that of FIG. 4A, so only differences between them will be described in detail below. The ANC system of FIG. 4B includes a noise generator 37 and combiners 36C, 36D that inject noise symmetrically into the correlation inputs of leaky LMS 54A, so that by injecting noise with a particular characteristic, the response of adaptive filter portion 44A which will have amplitude increases at the frequencies/bands in which noise signal n(z) has energy, but so that noise signal n(z) itself does not appear in the anti-noise signal.


Each or some of the elements in the systems of FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B, as well in as the exemplary circuits of FIG. 2 and FIGS. 3A-3E, can be implemented directly in logic, or by a processor such as a digital signal processing (DSP) core executing program instructions that perform operations such as the adaptive filtering and LMS coefficient computations. While the DAC and ADC stages are generally implemented with dedicated mixed-signal circuits, the architecture of the ANC system of the present invention will generally lend itself to a hybrid approach in which logic may be, for example, used in the highly oversampled sections of the design, while program code or microcode-driven processing elements are chosen for the more complex, but lower rate operations such as computing the taps for the adaptive filters and/or responding to detected events such as those described herein.


While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form, and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A personal audio device, comprising: a personal audio device housing;a transducer mounted on the personal audio device housing for reproducing an audio signal including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone mounted on the personal audio device housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone mounted on the personal audio device housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that implements an adaptive filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal to reduce a presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener, wherein the processing circuit implements a first fixed filter having a predetermined response acting in functional series with the adaptive filter, wherein the first fixed filter alters an anti-noise signal component of the audio signal, wherein the processing circuit further implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio to generate shaped source audio and a combiner that removes the shaped source audio from the error microphone signal to provide an error signal indicative of the combined anti-noise and ambient audio sounds delivered to the listener, wherein the processing circuit further subtracts the output of the first fixed filter from the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and adds a signal generated from the output of the adaptive filter to the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter to prevent a frequency response of the first fixed filter from appearing in the error signal, wherein the processing circuit shapes the response of the adaptive filter in conformity with the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal by adapting the response of the adaptive filter to minimize the ambient audio sounds at the error microphone.
  • 2. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the frequency response of the first fixed filter is a response shaped to remove a particular problem frequency from the anti-noise signal.
  • 3. The personal audio device of claim 2, wherein the particular problem frequency is a multipath null in the frequency range between 2 kHz and 5 kHz that is present in an acoustic path between the reference microphone and the error microphone.
  • 4. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit further implements a second fixed filter having a phase response matching a predetermined phase response of the first filter, but having an amplitude response that passes frequencies across a frequency band in which the predetermined response of the first fixed filter has substantial attenuation, wherein the processing circuit filters the output of the adaptive filter to generate the signal that is added to the source audio with the second fixed filter, so that the phase response of the first fixed filter does not cause error in the adapting of the adaptive filter, and wherein the processing circuit further implements a third fixed filter having a response matching the response of the second fixed filter, wherein the processing circuit further filters the reference microphone signal supplied to the copy of the secondary path adaptive filter with the third fixed filter.
  • 5. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the personal audio device is a wireless telephone further comprising a transceiver for receiving the source audio as a downlink audio signal.
  • 6. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the personal audio device is an audio playback device, wherein the source audio is a program audio signal.
  • 7. A method of canceling ambient audio sounds in the proximity of a transducer of a personal audio device, the method comprising: first measuring ambient audio sounds with a reference microphone to produce a reference microphone signal;second measuring an acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer with an error microphone;adaptively generating an anti-noise signal from a result of the first measuring and the second measuring for countering effects of ambient audio sounds at the transducer by adapting a response of an adaptive filter that filters the reference microphone signal;filtering a result of the adaptively generating with a first fixed filter having a predetermined response;shaping a copy of source audio with a secondary path response to generate shaped source audio;removing the shaped source audio from the error microphone signal to produce an error signal indicative of the combined anti-noise and ambient audio sounds delivered to a listener;second filtering the reference microphone signal with a response according to a copy of the secondary path adaptive filter to provide an input to the adaptive filter; andsubtracting the output of the first fixed filter from the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and adding a signal generated from the output of the adaptive filter to the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter to prevent a response of the first fixed filter from appearing in the error signal; andcombining the anti-noise signal with a source audio signal to generate an audio signal provided to the transducer.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the frequency response of the first fixed filter is a response shaped to remove a particular problem frequency from the anti-noise signal.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the particular problem frequency is a multipath null in the frequency range between 2 kHz and 5 kHz that is present in an acoustic path between the reference microphone and the error microphone.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, further comprising: filtering a the portion of the output of the adaptive filter to generate the signal that is added to the source audio with a second fixed filter having a phase response matching a predetermined phase response of the first fixed filter, but having an amplitude response that passes frequencies across a frequency band in which the predetermined response of the first fixed filter has substantial attenuation, so that the phase response of the first fixed filter does not cause error in the adaptively generating; andfiltering the reference microphone signal supplied to the second filtering with a third fixed filter having a response equal to the response of the second fixed filter.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the personal audio device is a wireless telephone, and wherein the method further comprises receiving the source audio as a downlink audio signal.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the personal audio device is an audio playback device, wherein the source audio is a program audio signal.
  • 13. An integrated circuit for implementing at least a portion of a personal audio device, comprising: an output for providing a signal to a transducer including both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; anda processing circuit that implements an adaptive filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal to reduce a presence of the ambient audio sounds heard by the listener, wherein the processing circuit implements a first fixed filter having a predetermined response acting in functional series with the adaptive filter, wherein the first fixed filter alters an anti-noise signal component of the audio signal, wherein the processing circuit further implements a secondary path adaptive filter having a secondary path response that shapes the source audio to generate shaped source audio and a combiner that removes the shaped source audio from the error microphone signal to provide an error signal indicative of the combined anti-noise and ambient audio sounds delivered to the listener, wherein the processing circuit further subtracts the output of the first fixed filter from the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter and adds a signal generated from the output of the adaptive filter to the source audio provided to the secondary path adaptive filter to prevent a frequency response of the first fixed filter from appearing in the error signal, wherein the processing circuit shapes the response of the adaptive filter in conformity with the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal by adapting the response of the adaptive filter to minimize the ambient audio sounds at the error microphone.
  • 14. The integrated circuit of claim 13, wherein the frequency response of the first fixed filter is a response shaped to remove a particular problem frequency from the anti-noise signal.
  • 15. The integrated circuit of claim 14, wherein the particular problem frequency is a multipath null in the frequency range between 2 kHz and 5 kHz that is present in an acoustic path between the reference microphone and the error microphone.
  • 16. The integrated circuit of claim 13, wherein the processing circuit further implements a second fixed filter having a phase response matching a predetermined phase response of the first filter, but having an amplitude response that passes frequencies across a frequency band in which the predetermined response of the first fixed filter has substantial attenuation, wherein the processing circuit filters the output of the adaptive filter to generate the signal that is added to the source audio with the second fixed filter, so that the phase response of the first fixed filter does not cause error in the adapting of the adaptive filter, and wherein the processing circuit further implements a third fixed filter having a response matching the response of the second fixed filter, wherein the processing circuit further filters the reference microphone signal supplied to the copy of the secondary path adaptive filter with the third fixed filter.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/333,484 filed on Dec. 21, 2011, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/493,162 filed on Jun. 3, 2011. The disclosure of the parent application is incorporated herein by reference and priority is claimed thereto under 35 U.S.C. §121.

US Referenced Citations (273)
Number Name Date Kind
4020567 Webster May 1977 A
4926464 Schley-May May 1990 A
4998241 Brox et al. Mar 1991 A
5018202 Takahashi May 1991 A
5021753 Chapman Jun 1991 A
5044373 Northeved et al. Sep 1991 A
5117401 Feintuch May 1992 A
5251263 Andrea et al. Oct 1993 A
5278913 Delfosse et al. Jan 1994 A
5321759 Yuan Jun 1994 A
5337365 Hamabe et al. Aug 1994 A
5359662 Yuan et al. Oct 1994 A
5377276 Terai et al. Dec 1994 A
5386477 Popovich Jan 1995 A
5410605 Sawada et al. Apr 1995 A
5425105 Lo et al. Jun 1995 A
5445517 Kondou et al. Aug 1995 A
5465413 Enge et al. Nov 1995 A
5481615 Eatwell et al. Jan 1996 A
5548681 Gleaves et al. Aug 1996 A
5550925 Hori et al. Aug 1996 A
5559893 Krokstad et al. Sep 1996 A
5586190 Trantow et al. Dec 1996 A
5640450 Watanabe Jun 1997 A
5668747 Ohashi Sep 1997 A
5687075 Stothers Nov 1997 A
5696831 Inanaga et al. Dec 1997 A
5699437 Finn Dec 1997 A
5706344 Finn Jan 1998 A
5740256 Castello Da Costa et al. Apr 1998 A
5768124 Stothers et al. Jun 1998 A
5815582 Claybaugh et al. Sep 1998 A
5832095 Daniels Nov 1998 A
5852667 Pan Dec 1998 A
5909498 Smith Jun 1999 A
5940519 Kuo Aug 1999 A
5946391 Dragwidge et al. Aug 1999 A
5991418 Kuo Nov 1999 A
6041126 Terai et al. Mar 2000 A
6118878 Jones Sep 2000 A
6181801 Puthuff et al. Jan 2001 B1
6219427 Kates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6278786 McIntosh Aug 2001 B1
6282176 Hemkumar Aug 2001 B1
6304179 Lotito et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317501 Matsuo Nov 2001 B1
6418228 Terai et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434246 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434247 Kates et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445799 Taenzer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6522746 Marchok et al. Feb 2003 B1
6542436 Myllyla Apr 2003 B1
6650701 Hsiang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6683960 Fujii et al. Jan 2004 B1
6738482 Jaber May 2004 B1
6766292 Chandran Jul 2004 B1
6768795 Feltstrom et al. Jul 2004 B2
6792107 Tucker et al. Sep 2004 B2
6850617 Weigand Feb 2005 B1
6940982 Watkins Sep 2005 B1
7016504 Shennib Mar 2006 B1
7058463 Ruha et al. Jun 2006 B1
7103188 Jones Sep 2006 B1
7181030 Rasmussen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7330739 Somayajula Feb 2008 B2
7365669 Melanson Apr 2008 B1
7466838 Moseley Dec 2008 B1
7680456 Muhammad et al. Mar 2010 B2
7742746 Xiang et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742790 Konchitsky et al. Jun 2010 B2
7817808 Konchitsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
7953231 Ishida May 2011 B2
8019050 Mactavish et al. Sep 2011 B2
8085966 Amsel Dec 2011 B2
D666169 Tucker et al. Aug 2012 S
8249262 Chua et al. Aug 2012 B2
8251903 LeBoeuf et al. Aug 2012 B2
8290537 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B2
8325934 Kuo Dec 2012 B2
8331604 Saito et al. Dec 2012 B2
8374358 Buck et al. Feb 2013 B2
8379884 Horibe et al. Feb 2013 B2
8401200 Tiscareno et al. Mar 2013 B2
8442251 Jensen et al. May 2013 B2
8559661 Tanghe Oct 2013 B2
8600085 Chen et al. Dec 2013 B2
8775172 Konchitsky et al. Jul 2014 B2
8804974 Melanson Aug 2014 B1
8831239 Bakalos Sep 2014 B2
8842848 Donaldson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8855330 Taenzer Oct 2014 B2
8908877 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Dec 2014 B2
8942976 Li et al. Jan 2015 B2
8977545 Zeng et al. Mar 2015 B2
9066176 Hendrix et al. Jun 2015 B2
9071724 Do et al. Jun 2015 B2
9082391 Yermeche et al. Jul 2015 B2
9129586 Bajic et al. Sep 2015 B2
20010053228 Jones Dec 2001 A1
20020003887 Zhang Jan 2002 A1
20030063759 Brennan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072439 Gupta Apr 2003 A1
20030185403 Sibbald Oct 2003 A1
20040047464 Yu et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040120535 Woods Jun 2004 A1
20040165736 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167777 Hetherington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040202333 Csermak et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240677 Onishi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242160 Ichikawa et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264706 Ray et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004796 Trump et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018862 Fisher Jan 2005 A1
20050117754 Sakawaki Jun 2005 A1
20050207585 Christoph Sep 2005 A1
20050240401 Ebenezer Oct 2005 A1
20060018460 McCree Jan 2006 A1
20060035593 Leeds Feb 2006 A1
20060055910 Lee Mar 2006 A1
20060069556 Nadjar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060153400 Fujita et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060159282 Borsch Jul 2006 A1
20060161428 Fouret Jul 2006 A1
20060251266 Saunders Nov 2006 A1
20070030989 Kates Feb 2007 A1
20070033029 Sakawaki Feb 2007 A1
20070038441 Inoue et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047742 Taenzer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053524 Haulick et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076896 Hosaka et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070154031 Avendano et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070258597 Rasmussen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070297620 Choy Dec 2007 A1
20080019548 Avendano Jan 2008 A1
20080101589 Horowitz et al. May 2008 A1
20080107281 Togami et al. May 2008 A1
20080144853 Sommerfeldt et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177532 Greiss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181422 Christoph Jul 2008 A1
20080226098 Haulick et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080240413 Mohammad et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240455 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080240457 Inoue et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269926 Xiang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012783 Klein Jan 2009 A1
20090034748 Sibbald Feb 2009 A1
20090041260 Jorgensen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046867 Clemow Feb 2009 A1
20090060222 Jeong et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080670 Solbeck et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086990 Christoph Apr 2009 A1
20090175461 Nakamura et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175466 Elko et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090196429 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090220107 Every et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090238369 Ramakrishnan et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245529 Asada et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254340 Sun et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090290718 Kahn et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090296965 Kojima Dec 2009 A1
20090304200 Kim et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311979 Husted et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100002891 Shiraishi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014683 Maeda et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014685 Wurm Jan 2010 A1
20100061564 Clemow et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069114 Lee et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082339 Konchitsky et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098263 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098265 Pan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100124335 Wessling et al. May 2010 A1
20100124336 Shridhar et al. May 2010 A1
20100124337 Wertz et al. May 2010 A1
20100131269 Park et al. May 2010 A1
20100142715 Goldstein et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150367 Mizuno Jun 2010 A1
20100158330 Guissin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100166203 Peissig et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100195838 Bright Aug 2010 A1
20100195844 Christoph et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100207317 Iwami et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100239126 Grafenberg et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100246855 Chen Sep 2010 A1
20100260345 Shridhar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266137 Sibbald et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272276 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272283 Carreras et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274564 Bakalos et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284546 DeBrunner et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291891 Ridgers et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100296666 Lin Nov 2010 A1
20100296668 Lee et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310086 Magrath et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322430 Isberg Dec 2010 A1
20110007907 Park et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026724 Doclo Feb 2011 A1
20110099010 Zhang Apr 2011 A1
20110106533 Yu May 2011 A1
20110116654 Chan et al. May 2011 A1
20110129098 Delano et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130176 Magrath et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142247 Fellers et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144984 Konchitsky Jun 2011 A1
20110150257 Jensen Jun 2011 A1
20110158419 Theverapperuma Jun 2011 A1
20110206214 Christoph et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110222698 Asao et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110249826 Van Leest Oct 2011 A1
20110288860 Schevciw et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293103 Park et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299695 Nicholson Dec 2011 A1
20110305347 Wurm Dec 2011 A1
20110317848 Ivanov et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120135787 Kusunoki et al. May 2012 A1
20120140917 Nicholson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120140942 Loeda Jun 2012 A1
20120140943 Hendrix et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120148062 Scarlett et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120155666 Nair Jun 2012 A1
20120170766 Alves et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120207317 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215519 Park et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120250873 Bakalos et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120259626 Li et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263317 Shin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120281850 Hyatt Nov 2012 A1
20120300955 Iseki et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300958 Klemmensen Nov 2012 A1
20120300960 Mackay et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120308021 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308024 Alderson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308025 Hendrix et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308026 Kamath et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120308027 Kwatra Dec 2012 A1
20120308028 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120310640 Kwatra et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130010982 Elko et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130083939 Fellers et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130195282 Ohita et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130243198 Van Rumpt Sep 2013 A1
20130243225 Yokota Sep 2013 A1
20130272539 Kim et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287218 Alderson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287219 Hendrix et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130301842 Hendrix et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301846 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301847 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301848 Zhou et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130301849 Alderson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130315403 Samuelsson Nov 2013 A1
20130343556 Bright Dec 2013 A1
20130343571 Rayala et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140016803 Puskarich Jan 2014 A1
20140036127 Pong et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140044275 Goldstein et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140050332 Nielsen et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140072134 Po et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140086425 Jensen et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140146976 Rundle May 2014 A1
20140169579 Azmi Jun 2014 A1
20140177851 Kitazawa et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140270222 Hendrix et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270223 Li et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270224 Zhou et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140294182 Axelsson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307887 Alderson Oct 2014 A1
20140307888 Alderson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140307890 Zhou et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140314244 Yong Oct 2014 A1
20140314247 Zhang Oct 2014 A1
20140369517 Zhou et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150092953 Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150161981 Kwatra Jun 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (38)
Number Date Country
102011013343 Sep 2012 DE
0412902 Feb 1991 EP
1691577 Aug 2006 EP
1880699 Jan 2008 EP
1947642 Jul 2008 EP
2133866 Dec 2009 EP
2216774 Aug 2010 EP
2237573 Oct 2010 EP
2395500 Dec 2011 EP
2395501 Dec 2011 EP
2551845 Jan 2013 EP
2401744 Nov 2004 GB
2436657 Oct 2007 GB
2455821 Jun 2009 GB
2455824 Jun 2009 GB
2455828 Jun 2009 GB
2484722 Apr 2012 GB
H06-186985 Jul 1994 JP
07104769 Apr 1995 JP
07240989 Sep 1995 JP
07325588 Dec 1995 JP
H11305783 Nov 1999 JP
2008015046 Jan 2008 JP
WO 9113429 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9911045 Mar 1999 WO
WO 03015074 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03015275 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2004009007 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004017303 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2006128768 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007007916 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007011337 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007110807 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2007113487 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2010117714 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2010131154 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2012134874 Oct 2012 WO
WO 2015038255 Mar 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (76)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,124, filed Mar. 12, 2015, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/686,353, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,160, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,367, filed Dec. 3, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,119, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,718, filed Dec. 27, 2012, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,018, filed Mar. 4, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/787,906, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,141, filed Dec. 28, 2012, Zhou, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,931, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,979, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,007, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Hendrix, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,159, filed Sep. 17, 2013, Li, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,951, filed Oct. 25, 2013, Zhou, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,814, filed Mar. 5, 2014, Kaller, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,537, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,589, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
Pfann, et al., “LMS Adaptive Filtering with Delta-Sigma Modulated Input Signals,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Apr. 1998, pp. 95-97, vol. 5, No. 4, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Toochinda, et al. “A Single-Input Two-Output Feedback Formulation for ANC Problems,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Jun. 2001, pp. 923-928, vol. 2, Arlington, VA.
Kuo, et al., “Active Noise Control: A Tutorial Review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 1999, pp. 943-973, vol. 87, No. 6, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Johns, et al., “Continuous-Time LMS Adaptive Recursive Filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Jul. 1991, pp. 769-778, vol. 38, No. 7, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Shoval, et al., “Comparison of DC Offset Effects in Four LMS Adaptive Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Processing, Mar. 1995, pp. 176-185, vol. 42, Issue 3, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Silva, et al., “Convex Combination of Adaptive Filters With Different Tracking Capabilities,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 15-20, 2007, pp. III 925-928, vol. 3, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Akhtar, et al., “A Method for Online Secondary Path Modeling in Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 23-26, 2005, pp. 264-267, vol. 1, Kobe, Japan.
Davari, et al., “A New Online Secondary Path Modeling Method for Feedforward Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Apr. 21-24, 2008, pp. 1-6, Chengdu, China.
Lan, et al., “An Active Noise Control System Using Online Secondary Path Modeling With Reduced Auxiliary Noise,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 16-18, vol. 9, Issue 1, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Liu, et al., “Analysis of Online Secondary Path Modeling With Auxiliary Noise Scaled by Residual Noise Signal,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Nov. 2010, pp. 1978-1993, vol. 18, Issue 8, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
Mali, Dilip, “Comparison of DC Offset Effects on LMS Algorithm and its Derivatives,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, May 2009, pp. 323-328, vol. 1, No. 1, Academy Publisher.
Kates, James M., “Principles of Digital Dynamic Range Compression,” Trends in Amplification, Spring 2005, pp. 45-76, vol. 9, No. 2, Sage Publications.
Gao, et al., “Adaptive Linearization of a Loudspeaker,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 14-17, 1991, pp. 3589-3592, Toronto, Ontario, CA.
Black, John W., “An Application of Side-Tone in Subjective Tests of Microphones and Headsets”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.20, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Feb. 1, 1954, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
Peters, Robert W., “The Effect of High-Pass and Low-Pass Filtering of Side-Tone Upon Speaker Intelligibility”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.25, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Aug. 16, 1954, 13 pages (pp. 1-13 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US.
Lane, et al., “Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and the Effects of Sidetone”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Feb. 1961, pp. 160-167, vol. 33, No. 2., Cambridge, MA, US.
Liu, et al., “Compensatory Responses to Loudness-shifted Voice Feedback During Production of Mandarin Speech”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Oct. 2007, pp. 2405-2412, vol. 122, No. 4.
Paepcke, et al., “Yelling in the Hall: Using Sidetone to Address a Problem with Mobile Remote Presence Systems”, Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 16-19, 2011, 10 pages (pp. 110 in pdf), Santa Barbara, CA, US.
Therrien, et al., “Sensory Attenuation of Self-Produced Feedback: The Lombard Effect Revisited”, PLOS ONE, Nov. 2012, pp. 1-7, vol. 7, Issue 11, e49370, Ontario, Canada.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,567, filed Dec. 22, 2014, Kwatra, et al.
Widrow, B., et al., Adaptive Noise Cancelling; Principles and Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, Dec. 1975, pp. 1692-1716, vol. 63, No. 13, IEEE, New York, NY, US.
Morgan, et al., A Delayless Subband Adaptive Filter Architecture, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, IEEE Service Center, Aug. 1995, pp. 1819-1829, vol. 43, No. 8, New York, NY, US.
Parkins, et al., “Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Jul. 2000, pp. 192-203, vol. 108, issue 1, US.
Feng, et al.., “A broadband self-tuning active noise equaliser”, Signal Processing, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 251-256, vol. 62, No. 2, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL.
Zhang, et al., “A Robust Online Secondary Path Modeling Method with Auxiliary Noise Power Scheduling Strategy and Norm Constraint Manipulation”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Service Center, Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 45-53, vol. 11, No. 1, NY.
Lopez-Gaudana, et al., “A hybrid active noise cancelling with secondary path modeling”, 51st Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2008, Aug. 10-13, 2008, pp. 277-280, IEEE, Knoxville, TN.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/038512, mailed on Jun. 20, 2013, 18 pages (pp. 1-18 in pdf).
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority in PCT/US2012/038512, mailed on Nov. 28, 2013, 4 pages (pp. 1-4 in pdf).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2012/038512, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, 29 pages (pp. 1-29 in pdf).
Campbell, Mikey, “Apple looking into self-adjusting earbud headphones with noise cancellation tech”, Apple Insider, Jul. 4, 2013, pp. 1-10 (10 pages in pdf), downloaded on May 14, 2014 from http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/07/04/apple-looking-into-self-adjusting-earbud-headphones-with-noise-cancellation-tech.
Jin, et al. “A simultaneous equation method-based online secondary path modeling algorithm for active noise control”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 455-474, vol. 303, No. 3-5, London, GB.
Erkelens, et al., “Tracking of Nonstationary Noise Based on Data-Driven Recursive Noise Power Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, Aug. 2008, pp. 1112-1123, vol. 16, No. 6, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rao, et al., “A Novel Two State Single Channel Speech Enhancement Technique”, India Conference (INDICON) 2011 Annual IEEE, IEEE, Dec. 2011, 6 pages (pp. 1-6 in pdf), Piscataway, NJ, US.
Rangachari, et al., “A noise-estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary environments”, Speech Communication, Feb. 2006, pp. 220-231, vol. 48, No. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,504, filed Feb. 8, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,832, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/724,656, filed Dec. 21, 2012, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/252,235, filed Apr. 14, 2014, Lu, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,013, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,935, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Hellman.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/896,526, filed May 17, 2013, Naderi.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,955, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,777, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson et al.
Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al., “On Maximum Achievable Noise Reduction in ANC Systems”,2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 14-19, 2010, pp. 349-352, Dallas, TX, US.
Cohen, Israel, “Noise Spectrum Estimation in Adverse Environments: Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-11, vol. 11, Issue 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Ryan, et al., “Optimum Near-Field Performance of Microphone Arrays Subject to a Far-Field Beampattern Constraint”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Nov. 2000, pp. 2248-2255, 108 (5), Pt. 1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Cohen, et al., “Noise Estimation by Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging for Robust Speech Enhancement”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 12-15, vol. 9, No. 1, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Noise Power Spectral Density Estimation Based on Optimal Smoothing and Minimum Statistics”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Jul. 2001, pp. 504-512, vol. 9, No. 5, Piscataway, NJ, US.
Martin, Rainer, “Spectral Subtraction Based on Minimum Statistics”, Signal Processing VII Theories and Applications, Proceedings of EUSIPCO-94, 7th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 13-16, 1994, pp. 1182-1185, vol. III, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.
Booij, et al., “Virtual sensors for local, three dimensional, broadband multiple-channel active noise control and the effects on the quiet zones”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2010, Sep. 20-22, 2010, pp. 151-166, Leuven.
Kuo, et al., “Residual noise shaping technique for active noise control systems”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (3), Mar. 1994, pp. 1665-1668.
Lopez-Caudana, Edgar Omar, “Active Noise Cancellation: The Unwanted Signal and The Hybrid Solution”, Adaptive Filtering Applications, Dr. Lino Garcia (Ed.), Jul. 2011, pp. 49-84, ISBN: 978-953-307306-4, InTech.
Senderowicz, et al., “Low-Voltage Double-Sampled Delta-Sigma Converters”, IEEE Journal on Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 1997, pp. 1907-1919, vol. 32, No. 12, Piscataway, NJ.
Hurst, et al., “An improved double sampling scheme for switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulators”, 1992 IEEE Int. Symp. On Circuits and Systems, May 10-13, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 1179-1182, San Diego, CA.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/333,484 mailed on Mar. 25, 2014, 17 pages (pp. 1-17 in pdf).
U.S. Appl. No. 14/734,321, filed Jun. 9, 2015, Alderson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/840,831, filed Aug. 31, 2015, Hendrix, et al.
Rafaely, Boaz, “Active Noise Reducing Headset—an Overview”, The 2001 International Congress and Exhibition on Noice Control Engineering, Aug. 27-30, 2001, 10 pages (pp. 1-10 in pdf), The Netherlands.
Ray, et al., “Hybrid Feedforward-Feedback Active Noise Reduction for Hearing Protection and Communication”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, Jan. 2006, pp. 2026-2036, vol. 120, No. 4, New York, NY.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140211953 A1 Jul 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61493162 Jun 2011 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13333484 Dec 2011 US
Child 14228322 US