1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to communication over an Ethernet-Class network and, more specifically to communication over a powerline network.
2. Background Art
The vision of the networked home has driven many a business plan, but product offerings to date have been too limited in capability or in market potential to achieve the dream. Home networking is different than networking in the workplace. The applications are different, the traffic patterns are different, and the media available to carry the data are different. Certainly home networking users will want to transfer files between their computers and share peripherals such as printers. They will want gateways to broadband access so they can share their Internet connection between multiple devices. Users will also want other services, such as voice-over-IP (VoIP), streaming media for entertainment, and support for multi-player networked games.
While some newer houses are wired with cables suitable for Ethernet, most are not. Thus, if choices for home network physical media are limited to phone wiring, wireless, and power line, there are a mixed bag of attributes.
There has been a proliferation of wireless networking and related components in recent years. However, wireless communication suffers from limited range and less than universal coverage, i.e. certain areas of the home cannot communicate with others. These issues are particularly prominent in certain types of construction that result in poor signal propagation, such as those using steel frame and brick walls. Solutions to these issues are expensive and complex, and require some technical acumen not available to the average homeowner.
Although telephone line networking may at first appear to be a solution, many households lack phone jacks at convenient locations to achieve the foreseeable benefits of home networking. For instance, some older houses may only have one phone jack located in the kitchen for use in the kitchen and other living areas (e.g. living room, family room, etc). Thus, it may be inconvenient or messy to provide network connections to remote devices. This picture is particularly unfavorable in less developed countries. Power plugs, on the other hand, are located in almost every room in the home, and some homes have multiple power outlets located on every wall of every room. The power line appears to be the most difficult medium of these three for communication, but it does have two appealing attributes. First, as with phone lines, no RF conversion hardware is needed and, thus, the cost can be low compared to wireless solutions. But more importantly, power outlets are almost everywhere someone might want to use a networked device at home.
The power line medium is a harsh environment for communication. For instance, the channel between any two outlets in a home has the transfer function of an extremely complicated transmission line network with many unterminated stubs and some having terminating loads of varying impedance. Such a network has an amplitude and phase response that varies widely with frequency. At some frequencies the transmitted signal may arrive at the receiver with relatively little loss, while at other frequencies it may be driven below the noise floor. Worse, the transfer function can change with time. This might happen because the homeowner has plugged a new device into the power line, or if some of the devices plugged into the network have time-varying impedance. As a result, the transfer function of the channel between outlet pairs may vary over a wide range. In some cases, a broad swath of bandwidth may be suitable for high quality transmission, while in other cases the channel may have a limited capacity to carry data.
Also, unplanned device usage by the homeowner can cause random variations in the transfer function of the channel between outlet pairs. As a result, the suitability of the channel's bandwidth for high quality transmission over the power line is impossible to predict before use of the channel is needed. Additionally, the bandwidth requirements of a connection between a receiver and a transmitter can change after the connection has been established, which can significantly impact Quality of Service (QoS) provided by the connection.
Since a connection between a pair of networked devices can require varying channel capacity, issues involving availability of channel bandwidth bring about concerns regarding the overall throughput of the network, QoS for each connection, monitoring of connection requirements, and adaptability of network resources. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for management and monitoring schemes that can effectively and efficiently address such concerns.
The present invention is directed to method and system for bandwidth management in a powerline network. More specifically, the invention provides a method and system for estimating channel capacity and monitoring connection requirements of networked devices to achieve effective bandwidth management in a powerline network.
In one aspect, a powerline network includes a number of stations including a central coordinator for coordinating transmissions of each of the stations. Each of the stations is configurable to generate one or more tone maps for communicating with each of the other stations in the powerline network. Each tone map includes a set of tones to be used on a communication link between two of the stations. Each tone map further includes a unique set of modulation methods for each tone. Each of the stations is further configurable to generate a default tone map for communicating with each of the other stations, where the default tone map is valid for all portions of a powerline cycle. Each of the stations is further configurable to monitor its bandwidth needs and to request additional bandwidth from the central coordinator. Each of the stations is further configurable to indicate a bandwidth need in a frame control field of a transmission, where the central coordinator is configurable to monitor the frame control field of the transmission so as to respond to the bandwidth need. Each of the tone maps can be generated as a result of a channel estimation procedure during a connection between two of the stations, where the channel estimation procedure includes measuring characteristics of a channel.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art after reviewing the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art after reviewing the following detailed description and accompanying drawings, wherein:
Although the invention is described with respect to specific embodiments, the principles of the invention, as defined by the claims appended herein, can obviously be applied beyond the specifically described embodiments of the invention described herein. Moreover, in the description of the present invention, certain details have been left out in order to not obscure the inventive aspects of the invention. The details left out are within the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill in the art.
The drawings in the present application and their accompanying detailed description are directed to merely example embodiments of the invention. To maintain brevity, other embodiments of the invention which use the principles of the present invention are not specifically described in the present application and are not specifically illustrated by the present drawings. It should be borne in mind that, unless noted otherwise, like or corresponding elements among the figures may be indicated by like or corresponding reference numerals.
HPAV system 100 utilizes OFDM modulation technique due to its inherent adaptability in the presence of frequency selective channels, its resilience to narrow band interference, and its robustness to impulsive noise. Through the use of time-domain pulse shaping of the OFDM symbols, deep frequency notches can be achieved without the additional requirement of transmit notch filters. HPAV system 100 employs 1155 carriers, in the range from 1.80 MHz to 30.00 MHz.
As shown in
At receiver side 360, AFE 365 operates with an Automatic Gain Controller (AGC) 368 and a time-synchronization module 370 to feed separate frame control and payload data recovery circuits. The frame control data is recovered by processing the received sample stream through 384-point FFT 372 for HomePlug 1.0.1 delimiters, and 3072-point FFT 374 for HomePlug AV, and through separate frame control decoders 380 and 382 for respective HomePlug 1.0.1 and HomePlug AV modes. The payload portion of the sampled time domain waveform, which contains only HomePlug AV formatted symbols, is processed through 3072-point FFT 374, demodulator 375, and through de-interleaver 385, turbo convolutional decoder 386, and de-scrambler 387 of AV payload data decoder 384 to recover the AV payload data.
In the present invention, the CCo of a network (e.g. CCo1 of AVLN 202 in
Each HPAV station (e.g. stations A, B, C, and D in
As also shown in
Information describing allocations within beacon period 402 is broadcast in the beacon payload by using one or more beacon Entries. Beacon region 406 also includes information regarding the duration of CSMA region 408 and reserved region 410. CSMA region 408 includes persistent shared CSMA allocation region 416, which is allocated to connections (i.e. sessions between transmitting and receiving stations) that use CSMA channel-access mechanism. CSMA region 408 is a contention period (CP) which is also known as CSMA/CA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access/contention access) period. Reserved region 410, which is the section of beacon period 402 during which only one station has permission to transmit, is further divided into persistent allocation region 412 and non-persistent allocation region 414. Persistent allocation region 412 is allocated to connections (i.e. sessions between transmitting and receiving stations), where the connections require QoS (Quality of Service). Persistent allocation region 412 is a contention free period (CFP) and can utilize TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) channel access. Non-persistent allocation region 414 is allocated to one or more of the following:
(a) active connections that have allocation in persistent allocation region 412 but may need extra capacity, either because the channel has deteriorated for a brief or longer period of time, or because the requirements of a particular application have increased (e.g. during video or audio fast forward);
(b) an additional CSMA period (e.g. when the CCo senses high level of collisions in the regular CSMA period; and
(c) special system needs, such as a discover beacon, whose purpose is to discover hidden nodes (i.e. stations) that cannot detect or hear the CCo.
In the invention's HPAV system (e.g. HPAV system 100 in
Channel estimation can include selection of the modulation method(s) used on each carrier (i.e. tone), selection of the FEC (Forward Error Correction) rate, selection of the guard interval length, and selection of the intervals within the AC line cycle (i.e. the powerline cycle) where a particular tone map setting applies. The FEC rate and guard interval length can vary over the powerline cycle period, but they are the same for all carriers at any given time.
All stations in the powerline network establish a default tone map that is valid for reception by the particular station in all of the CSMA and CFP period (i.e. the whole Beacon Period a station may transmit). In addition, stations may establish AC line cycle adapted Tone Maps, i.e. Tone Maps that are valid in portion(s) of the Beacon Period and the underlying AC line cycle.
A channel estimation procedure enables a transmitting station to obtain tone maps that can be used at various intervals of the powerline cycle while communicating with a particular receiving station. Powerline channels are unique between each transmitting station and receiving station. As a result, the channel estimation procedure must be executed independently between each transmitting station and receiving station. The channel estimation procedure also includes mechanisms for negotiating the number of tone maps that can be used, maintaining lists of valid tone maps, and maintaining the lists of intervals within the powerline cycle where each tone map may be used. The channel estimation procedure can be divided into an initial channel estimation procedure and a dynamic channel adaptation procedure. The transmitting station invokes an initial channel estimation procedure when it needs to transmit data to a particular receiving station and does not have any valid tone maps.
Referring now to
Beginning at step 502, a transmitting station with data to send to a receiving station determines that it (i.e. the transmitting station) has no valid tone maps. At step 504, the transmitting station initiates a channel estimation procedure by sending a sound MPDU (MAC Protocol Data Unit) with SRC (Sound Reason Code) set to indicate sounding for initial channel estimation. This MPDU, which is also referred to as an “initial transmission” in the patent application, specifies the maximum number of tone maps that the transmitting station can allocate to this “link.” Within the MAC, a connection is decomposed into one or more unidirectional data flows called “links.” The sound MPDU is used during channel estimation to estimate the characteristics of the channel. Initial channel estimation can take place in either the CP or the CFP.
At step 506: the receiving station sends a sound MPDU with SAF (Sound ACK Flag) bit in the FC (Frame Control) field appropriately set to acknowledge reception of the sound MPDU from the transmitting station. At step 508, the transmitting station continues to send sound MPDUs to the receiving station until the receiving station indicates that it has sufficient data to generate tone maps. For example, the receiving station can send a sound MPDU to the transmitting station with the SAF and the SCF (Sound Complete Flag) appropriately set to indicate that it (i.e. the receiving station) has sufficient data to generate the tone maps. At step 510, the receiving station generates a new tone map and sends it to the transmitting station as a default tone map. The new tone map can be sent in a CEI (Channel Estimation Indication) message having a response type field that indicates that the message includes a default tone map that is generated as a result of the initial channel estimation procedure. After generating the default tone map, the receiving station can also generate one or more powerline cycle adapted tone maps.
If the initial channel estimation procedure is performed in the CP, the transmitting station must contend for the channel prior to sending sound MPDUs to the receiving station. Conducting the initial channel estimation procedure in the CP may preclude the transmitting station from transmitting sound MPDUs during certain parts of the powerline cycle. Similarly, if the initial channel estimation procedure is performed in the CFP, the transmitting station may lack sufficient allocation to span a complete powerline cycle. In either case, the receiving station is required to provide a tone map referred to as the default tone map that is valid for all portions of the beacon period (or powerline cycle).
A dynamic channel adaptation procedure can be performed by the receiving station after the initial channel estimation procedure has been performed. The dynamic channel adaptation procedure can result in dynamic updates to the default tone map (i.e. replacing an existing default tone map with a new default tone map). This procedure can also result in the generation of powerline cycle adapted tone maps that are valid at various intervals of the powerline cycle, where some of powerline cycle adapted tone maps may replace existing tone maps. In contrast to the default tone map, powerline cycle adapted tone maps are fine tuned for channel characteristics within a specific interval of the powerline cycle. Thus, a powerline cycle adapted tone map should be used by the transmitting station whenever one is available and can be used (based on the CPF field in CEI). Tone maps need to be updated and refreshed on a regular basis, otherwise they are declared as stale, and cannot be used in connections. This adaptation is needed to capture changes of the channel resulting from removal or addition of equipment in the neighborhood of the receiving or transmitting station, for example.
During a connection, the health of an active link is constantly monitored by both the receiving and transmitting stations (the transmitting station can receive feedback from the receiving station by means of the Selective ACK mechanism). When one station senses that more resources are needed to satisfy the QoS requirements of the connection, the stations can request more resources from the CCo. More resources may be needed, for example, because the channel has degraded or because the traffic presented to the transmitting station by the application has increased.
In addition to explicit requests for additional resources by the stations involved in the connection, the stations can indicate their resource needs to the CCo through special fields in the FC (Frame Control) field of each transmission. Each transmission on the channel starts with a special portion called the Frame Control (FC), which provides special information to the receiving station (e.g. what tone map is used in the modulation of the payload, or what code rate is used for error correction). One of the fields in the FC provides an indication of how many blocks are waiting for transmission in the transmitting station. If the number of blocks waiting for transmission appears excessive (i.e. if the transmitting station is suffering from congestion), the CCo, which can monitor the FC from all the transmissions in the powerline network, can allocate more resources to that connection. Additional allocations can be temporary (e.g. allocations communicated in Non-persistent allocations) to deal with short-term link degradation that results from changes in channel characteristics to which the PHY layer adapts successfully. Allocation changes can also be longer term to deal with changes in the channel to which the PHY layer cannot simply adapt, or with changes in the traffic load caused by a particular application.
Thus, as discussed above, the present invention provides an HPAV system including stations that communicate via a powerline in a powerline network, where each of the stations can be configured to generate one or more tone maps for communicating with each of the other stations, and where the tone maps indicate an amount of information that can be reliably carried in different tones. Each of the stations can be further configured to monitor its bandwidth needs and communicate its bandwidth needs to a CCo (central coordinator) for allocation of additional resources. As a result, the present invention achieves an HPAV system that advantageously provides effective bandwidth management in a powerline network environment.
From the above description of the invention it is manifest that various techniques can be used for implementing the concepts of the present invention without departing from its scope. Moreover, while the invention has been described with specific reference to certain embodiments, a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that changes could be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. For example, it is contemplated that the circuitry disclosed herein can be implemented in software and/or hardware, and the software may be stored in any storage medium or memory. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. It should also be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of many rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/702,717, filed on Jul. 27, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The following U.S. Patent Applications are also incorporated by reference in their entireties and made part of the present application: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/492,506, titled “Flexible Scheduling Of Resources In A Noisy Environment,” filed concurrently with the present application; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/492,487, titled “Communicating Schedule and Network information in a Powerline Network,” filed concurrently with the present application; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/705,720, titled “Communicating in a Network that includes a Medium having Varying Transmission Characteristics, filed Aug. 2, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/339,293, titled “Time Synchronization in a Network,” filed Jan. 24, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/337,946, titled “Communicating in a Network that includes a Medium having Varying Transmission Characteristics,” filed Jan. 23, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/421,155, titled “Synchronizing Channel Sharing with Neighboring Networks,” filed on May 31, 2006, assigned to Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/703,236, titled “Method for Sharing the Channel with Neighbor Networks,” filed Jul. 27, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/420,432, titled “Method for Providing Requested Quality of Service,” filed on May 25, 2006, assigned to Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/703,317, titled “Method for Providing Requested Quality of Service,” filed Jul. 27, 2005; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/337,963, titled “Managing Contention-Free Time Allocations in a Network,” filed Jan. 23, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6172615 | Kogure | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172616 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6278357 | Croushore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6577231 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587474 | Griessbach | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6834091 | Litwin et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6882634 | Bagchi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888844 | Mallory | May 2005 | B2 |
6952399 | Bayerl et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6985072 | Omidi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000031 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7206320 | Iwamura | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218901 | Mobley et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7307357 | Kopp | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7359398 | Sugaya | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369579 | Logvinov et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388853 | Ptasinski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7423992 | Iwamura | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7664145 | Akamatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20030053493 | Mobley et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071721 | Manis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030107476 | Sahinoglu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030231715 | Shoemake et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040122531 | Atsuta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136396 | Yonge et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174851 | Zalitzky et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184427 | Lynch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208139 | Iwamura | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040264557 | Maruyama | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050276276 | Davis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060098606 | Pandey | May 2006 | A1 |
20060164969 | Malik | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060218269 | Iwamura | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227729 | Budampati | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233203 | Iwamura | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070025266 | Riedel | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025384 | Ayyagari | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070237070 | Geile et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080095126 | Mahany | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080201503 | McKim et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090279638 | Kurobe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1065818 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1179919 | Feb 2002 | EP |
HE08-265241 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000165304 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-135177 | May 2002 | JP |
2005-73240 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005079615 | Mar 2005 | JP |
WO2004095165 | Nov 2004 | KR |
WO 9634329 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 0118998 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0118998 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 02103943 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03100996 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03103222 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005015841 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024558 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005048047 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English abstract of JP 2000165304 generated online on May 22, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070025386 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60702717 | Jul 2005 | US | |
60705720 | Aug 2005 | US | |
60703236 | Jul 2005 | US | |
60703317 | Jul 2005 | US |