The present invention relates, in general, to wireless communication and, more specifically, to managing bandwidth using statistical measurements
Data measurement using measurement probes and tools has been a common practice since the advent of measuring tools. The earliest tools, such as sun dials, wind vanes, sextants, and the like, were manually or naturally driven with the data simply written down or remembered. Newer probes include temperature sensors, weather probes, radio frequency (RF) sensors, global positioning system (GPS) receivers, and the like, are now driven by computers and electronics. The modern trend has evolved to using wireless probes for certain types of measurement tasks. Generally, a measurement task that may be targeted in stationary, remote locations or events that may be tracked across a wide area are all good candidates to use wireless measurement probes. For example, probes measuring wireless communication networks, traffic patterns, pollution levels, environmental conditions, and the like, are each have use for a remote probe that sends its measurements over the airwaves. This process generally relieves the cost to place human resources in the field and also allows for probes to be placed in extreme areas that may not typically be accessible or inviting to humans. By using a wireless probe, there is no need to run cabling to the remote location, which both relieves the costs involved for the cabling, but also may diminish the impact on the environment.
One of the problems with wireless probes, however, is the data bandwidth limitations of the wireless networks. Most measurement probes are capable of taking measurements at a rate well in excess of the rate at which the measured data can be transmitted over the wireless network. This data throughput mismatch creates a problem in getting the measured information to the processing point. Either data will have to be dropped or will have to be saved. Current solutions for mobile-type wireless probes generally involve the probe attached to a large storage facility, such as a large hard disk, or other type of storage. While this allows for a large amount of data to be measured and used in analysis, the measured data needs to be downloaded from the storage at the processing center before any processing may be done. Other solutions have involved the use of “smart” probes, which are probes that have a limited amount of embedded processing functionality. These smart probes may be programmed to control the actual measure-taking in some limiting, yet logical, fashion.
Such smart probes may be used to control the measurement process in bandwidth-sensitive ways. For example, if a phenomenon to be measured is really only interesting for a certain period of time, the probe may be programmed to make its measurements only during the times of interest. Similarly, if the phenomenon were only present in certain locations, the probe may be programmed to make measurements only when it is in those zones or locations of interest. Moreover, there may be phenomena that are interesting over a combination of time and location. In these cases, the probe may be programmed to measure only in the interesting times and locations. By strategically limiting the measurement process, the amount of raw data collected may be greatly reduced. However, while these measurement strategies greatly reduce the amount of raw measurement data is collected, the amount of data that may be collected by a probe within the limited zones of interest may still overwhelm any available bandwidth resources.
Representative embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method for managing bandwidth in a wireless probe measurement system comprising receiving an indicator at the wireless probe to begin taking measurements of one or more variables, measuring the one or more variables, calculating a set of statistical values at the wireless probe using the measured one or more variables, and transmitting the set of statistical values to a central station.
Further representative embodiments of the present invention are directed to a wireless probe for measuring desired phenomena that may include a processor, a transducer for capturing measurements, code operable by the processor, for calculating statistical information on the captured measurements, and a communication interface for transmitting the statistical information to a data clearinghouse.
Still further representative embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method measuring desired phenomena using a wireless probe that may include measuring one or more variables related to the desired phenomena, calculating statistical data at the wireless probe using the measured one or more variables, responsive to receiving a transition event notification, and transmitting the statistical data to a central processing location.
Additional representative embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method for analyzing desired phenomena in a defined area using a plurality of wireless probes, the method that may include dividing the defined area into a grid having a plurality of grid sections, taking raw measurements related to the desired phenomena across the defined area, determining a location of each of the raw measurements, assigning each of the raw measurements to one of the plurality of grid sections responsive to the location falling within a perimeter of the one of the plurality of grid sections, calculating statistical data at the wireless probe using the raw measurements, and communicating the statistical data to a central analysis center.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the present invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:
In one embodiment of the bandwidth management system described herein, RF probes are used to measure attributes of a cellular telephone network.
It should be noted that the application of the present invention is not limited to testing RF attributes of cellular networks. The system depicted in
The measurement process implemented by RF probe 104 may be controlled using a time/distance algorithm. For example, the probe may be directed to make a measurement every ‘X’ meters. However, if the probe determines that it is moving very fast, very slowly, or is stopped altogether, the algorithm may change to direct a measurement be taken every ‘Y’ seconds, if moving too slowly, or, if moving to quickly, then once ‘X’ meters have elapsed, a check is made that ‘Z’ seconds have also elapsed before taking the next measurement, where ‘Z’ is less than ‘Y’.
Half-kilometer bin lines 200 indicate bins between antennae 101 and 102 that delimit areas in which the signal strength may not vary considerably within the particular half-kilometer bin. Using such a separated breakdown, statistical analysis may be used to analyze the attributes of the antennae because the relative signal strength within any given bin should not generally vary to any large extent.
Part of the analysis of a particular phenomena may be to check for certain alarm conditions. For example, in cellular network 10, if the signal power falls below a certain level, the cell may fail, dropping calls and possibly causing a communication crisis. Similarly, if signal power is too strong, there may be interference with neighboring cells. Therefore, knowing the level of a single raw measurement may be beneficial to the analyzing authority. As the raw measurements are taken by the probe, the probe may compare those measurements to certain alarm conditions for the phenomena being tested. If an alarm condition is exceeded, the probe may issue an alarm. When using a wireless measurement system, it is beneficial to assign a priority level to the communications in order to give a higher priority to the limited bandwidth for more important data. An alarm issued by a probe may be classified as a high priority message, which is sent to the central station over other communication.
One embodiment of the present invention uses statistical calculations performed on the probe to reduce the amount of data transmitted to the central station. Referring back to
In operation, a single wireless probe may pass through any particular bin of interest only randomly. Therefore, using only a single probe may increase the unreliability of the measured data because of the infrequency of the measurement any may also leave some bins unmeasured altogether. In many systems, multiple probes are used to gather measurement information. This information may then be aggregated at the central station to more accurately analyze the different bins of interest. To accommodate this aggregation at the central station, the set of statistical values calculated and transmitted may be limited to intermediate statistical values, such as the summation of particular measurements. In such embodiments, a single probe may calculate the summation of a particular measurement, X, and send the statistical values N and Σ1-NX. When each of the statistical values is received from the different probes in the field, the central station is then able to aggregate the measurements into a larger population using the different sample sizes, N1–Nm, and summations Σ1-NX1–Σ1-NXm, Σ1-NX12–Σ1-NXm2, Σ1-NX13–Σ1-NXm3, where each of N1–Nm and X1–Xm are the sample size and measurements for probes 1-m making measurements in the target bin. The square and other higher-ordered summations may be used in calculating other statistical variables, such as standard deviation and the like. Therefore, for example, in calculating the aggregate mean, which is just a single example of a statistical variable that may be calculated, for the particular bin, the central stations may calculate:
Aggregate Mean=(ΣX1+ΣX2+ . . . ΣXm)/(N1+N2+ . . . Nm) (1)
Linear statistical schemes, which include the mean, standard deviation, and the like, are just one type that may be used. Other schemes, such as exponential, Poisson, uniform, and the like, may also be used. However, the probe should transmit the type of statistical scheme being used along with the statistical value set.
As noted above, if the bin size is too small, the savings in the number of measurements per bin or grid is offset by the number of measurements for each of the multiple bins. An alternative to calculating single variable measurement/calculation is to increase the bin or grid size and use multiple measurement/calculations which may then be cross-correlated to obtain the statistical analysis. The process in implementing the multi-variable descriptive statistics is similar to the steps identified in
In another embodiment of the present invention, an area to be tested may be dynamically gridded by the probe, instead of having a static artificial grid overlaid onto the area.
In operation, wireless measurement probe compares each raw measurement to the calculated statistics in current statistical bin 508.
If no alarm conditions are met, statistics are calculated in step 605 representing the measurements of the phenomena. The statistical values are assigned a medium priority, in step 606. At the same time, the raw measurements may be decimated in step 607 to reduce the total amount of measurement data on the probe. In step 608, the decimated measurements are assigned a low priority for transmission to the central station. In step 609, the decimated raw measurements are then stored in a local memory or local storage. In step 610, communications from the probe are transmitted to the central station according to the assigned priority level.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one will readily appreciate from the disclosure, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4940976 | Gastouniotis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5425076 | Knippelmier | Jun 1995 | A |
5539645 | Mandhyan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5805200 | Counselman, III | Sep 1998 | A |
5852409 | Bell | Dec 1998 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
5987306 | Nilsen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987320 | Bobick | Nov 1999 | A |
6163276 | Irving et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169896 | Sant et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219544 | Suutarinen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6401054 | Andersen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459898 | Yegenoglu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6563460 | Stilp et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6580983 | Laguer-Diaz et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6625448 | Stern | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6711404 | Arpee et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6754470 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6807515 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6873601 | Chow et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6914944 | Nokkonen et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6915128 | Oh | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928280 | Xanthos et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
20020069037 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030064720 | Valins et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030162539 | Fiut et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040176040 | Thornton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203437 | Burch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 715 285 | Nov 1995 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050096049 A1 | May 2005 | US |