1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of duct-type cable routing systems. More specifically, the invention relates to fittings that include barb assemblies that can bitingly engage an end of a cable duct section and oppose removal of the cable duct section from the cable duct component.
2. Background
Raceway duct systems have become very popular in recent years to route, protect, and conceal data, voice, video, fiber optic, and/or power cabling. Such systems allow custom installation and can be provided within walls or provided on external surfaces, allowing ready access for reconfiguration, repair, or installation of additional equipment. Such systems may typically include various sections of duct or raceway, including straight sections and various fittings, such as 90° elbow fittings, 45° elbow fittings, T-fittings, four-way intersection (x) fittings, and the like, respective ones of which are affixed together by duct couplers to cumulatively form a duct system.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,634,605, 6,523,791, 6,450,458, and 6,559,378 provide examples and descriptions of the general background of cable duct couplers and other cable duct fittings, and the entirety of these applications are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth here in full. U.S. Pat. No. 5,316,243 (assigned to ADC Telecommunications, Inc.) provides a description of the general background and environment of cable routing systems, and the specification of that issued patent is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth here in full.
Due to the increase in the number and sophistication of such raceway duct systems, the number of duct couplers and fittings being installed in such systems has also increased significantly. Therefore, it is important to have couplers and fittings that are easy to install and inexpensive to manufacture, and that provide relatively high resistance to “pullout” forces to prevent unintended disassembly.
Previous designs disclosed cable duct components with barb assemblies that could bitingly engage another component of a cable duct system, such as a section of cable duct or raceway. Through such engagement, the barb could resist a tensile “pullout” force applied to the other cable duct component, and the barb could oppose removal of that component. There are limits, however, to the pullout force that the barb can resist. Although previous designs were improvements over the prior art, it would be a further improvement to provide a product that could resist a larger pullout force. Significantly, the present invention increases the ability of a barb to resist a tensile pullout force.
In one embodiment, there is provided a barb assembly for use with a cable duct component to oppose removal of a cable duct section from the cable duct component, the barb assembly comprising a barb comprising a body and one or more barb arms extending from the body to bitingly engage an end of a cable duct section and to oppose removal of a cable duct section from the cable duct component, and one or more barb arm supports.
In another embodiment, there is also provided a cable duct component that can receive an end of a cable duct section, the cable duct component comprising a barb assembly comprising a barb comprising a body and one or more barb arms extending from the body to bitingly engage an end of a cable duct section and to oppose removal of a cable duct section from the cable duct component, and one or more barb arm supports.
In another embodiment, there is also provided a cable duct component comprising a barb comprising a body and one or more barb arms extending from the body to bitingly engage an end of a cable duct section and to oppose removal of a cable duct section from the cable duct component, and one or more barb arm supports that can engage one of the barb arms to increase the ability of the barb assembly to oppose removal of the cable duct section from the cable duct component.
In another embodiment, there is also provided a cable duct system comprising a cable duct section comprising an end, and a cable duct component that can receive the end of the cable duct section, the cable duct component comprising a barb assembly, the barb assembly comprising a barb comprising a body and one or more barb arms extending from the body to bitingly engage the cable duct section and to oppose removal of the cable duct section from the cable duct component, and one or more barb arm supports.
In another embodiment, there is also provided a method for assembling a cable duct system, the method comprising providing a cable duct section comprising an end, providing a cable duct component that can receive the end of the cable duct section, the cable duct component comprising a barb assembly, the barb assembly comprising a barb comprising a body and one or more barb arms extending from the body to bitingly engage the end of the cable duct section and to oppose removal of the end of the cable duct section from the cable duct component, and one or more barb arm supports, and inserting the end of the cable duct section into the cable duct component.
Embodiments of the present invention are described herein with reference to the drawings, in which:
The embodiments herein are directed to a new and improved barb assembly with a barb arm support. The barb assembly with the barb arm support can be used advantageously as part of another component, such as a cable duct coupler, for example, to engage and disengage one or more components of cable routing systems. The barb arm support can also be used advantageously with the various releasable barb assembly embodiments described and claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/808,974, filed on Mar. 25, 2004, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Although several examples of particular embodiments are provided below, it should be understood that all the arrangements described herein are set forth for purposes of example only. As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other arrangements and other assemblies are contemplated as well.
Barb arm support structure 272 may take various forms. Referring to
As depicted in the embodiment of
Failure of a barb 230 might occur, however, if the tensile pullout force 270 is sufficient to overcome the ability of the barb 230 to resist that force. As depicted in the embodiment of
In one embodiment, each barb arm support structure 272 can support one of the barb arms 240 such that the support structure 272 can decrease the magnitude of the moment arm 284 and thereby increase the ability of the barb 230 to resist the tensile pullout force 270. The embodiment depicted in
In some embodiments, the barb arm support structure 272 can actually change the mode of failure of the barb assembly 210. For example, some placements or constructions of the barb arm support structure 272 could act to reduce the risk of failure of the barb 230 so much that the risk of failure shifts to other components of the barb assembly or cable duct system, such as the component 234, for example.
Several examples of particular embodiments of the present invention have been described above. Those skilled in the art will understand, however, that changes and modifications may be made to these embodiments without departing from the true scope and spirit of the present invention, which is defined by the claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/513,121, filed Oct. 21, 2003, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
834828 | Lutz | Oct 1906 | A |
917328 | Lutz | Apr 1909 | A |
1087791 | Leavitt | Feb 1914 | A |
D49688 | Abbott | Sep 1916 | S |
D49694 | Abbott | Sep 1916 | S |
D52954 | Hubbard et al. | Feb 1919 | S |
1590569 | Fisk | Jun 1926 | A |
1682840 | Foerch, Jr. | Sep 1928 | A |
1862433 | Ross | Jun 1932 | A |
2316166 | Huguelet | Apr 1943 | A |
2682321 | Brock | Jun 1954 | A |
2821154 | Tennison | Jan 1958 | A |
2823056 | Di Meo | Feb 1958 | A |
2829190 | Comlossy | Apr 1958 | A |
2834622 | Reeves | May 1958 | A |
D184913 | Cataldo et al. | Apr 1959 | S |
3023032 | Johnston et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3042351 | Du Bois | Jul 1962 | A |
3272537 | Stone et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3275355 | Endler et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3351699 | Merckle | Nov 1967 | A |
3370121 | Merckle | Feb 1968 | A |
3401721 | George | Sep 1968 | A |
3425456 | Schibig | Feb 1969 | A |
3451033 | Flachbarth | Jun 1969 | A |
3457598 | Mariani | Jul 1969 | A |
3471629 | O'Leary | Oct 1969 | A |
3570546 | Jackson | Mar 1971 | A |
3600010 | Downs, III et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3633628 | Duquette et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3841101 | Henfrey | Oct 1974 | A |
3875618 | Schuplin | Apr 1975 | A |
3906146 | Taylor | Sep 1975 | A |
3931946 | Soltysik | Jan 1976 | A |
3938767 | Norris | Feb 1976 | A |
4099749 | Van Vliet | Jul 1978 | A |
4105051 | Visentin | Aug 1978 | A |
4163572 | Benscoter | Aug 1979 | A |
4202090 | Cook | May 1980 | A |
4270020 | Kenworthy et al. | May 1981 | A |
4305236 | Williams | Dec 1981 | A |
4306109 | Nattel | Dec 1981 | A |
4398564 | Young et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4602124 | Santucci | Jul 1986 | A |
4627469 | Buard | Dec 1986 | A |
4931597 | Kimbrough et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4954015 | McGowan | Sep 1990 | A |
5035092 | Brant | Jul 1991 | A |
5038528 | Brant | Aug 1991 | A |
D320782 | Henneberger | Oct 1991 | S |
D321682 | Henneberger | Nov 1991 | S |
5067678 | Henneberger et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5100221 | Carney et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
D327874 | Henneberger | Jul 1992 | S |
5161580 | Klug | Nov 1992 | A |
D334380 | Henneberger | Mar 1993 | S |
5271585 | Zetena, Jr. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271586 | Schmidt | Dec 1993 | A |
D347209 | Henneberger | May 1994 | S |
5316243 | Henneberger | May 1994 | A |
5316244 | Zetena, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5391840 | Hughes et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5522675 | Gunter | Jun 1996 | A |
5735637 | Gunter | Apr 1998 | A |
5752781 | Haataja et al. | May 1998 | A |
5872336 | Long | Feb 1999 | A |
6192181 | Haataja et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6450458 | Bernard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6523791 | Bernard | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6559378 | Bernard | May 2003 | B1 |
6634605 | Bernard et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6709186 | Ferris et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7093997 | Ferris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20030085327 | Bernard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040051007 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
526367 | Jun 1931 | DE |
27 06 191 | Aug 1978 | DE |
31 14 225 | Nov 1982 | DE |
33 46 211 | Jun 1985 | DE |
36 36 412 | Apr 1988 | DE |
3636412 | Apr 1988 | DE |
38 04 542 | Sep 1989 | DE |
41 20 937 | Mar 1992 | DE |
3 879 353 | Apr 1993 | DE |
200 22 356 | Dec 2001 | DE |
0 315 023 | May 1989 | EP |
0 348 285 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 798 581 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1 049 226 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1160950 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 100 982 | Sep 1955 | FR |
1.138.599 | Jun 1957 | FR |
1207610 | Jun 1958 | FR |
2 343 393 | Sep 1977 | FR |
2 365 902 | Apr 1978 | FR |
2 488 064 | Feb 1982 | FR |
2 488 742 | Feb 1982 | FR |
2 680 206 | Feb 1993 | FR |
2 686 141 | Jul 1993 | FR |
518208 | Feb 1940 | GB |
549 840 | Dec 1942 | GB |
612162 | Nov 1948 | GB |
956898 | Apr 1964 | GB |
1 124 370 | Aug 1968 | GB |
1 342 085 | Dec 1973 | GB |
5-130726 | May 1993 | JP |
288545 | Mar 1964 | NL |
920930 | Apr 1982 | SU |
WO 0075550 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050098687 A1 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60513121 | Oct 2003 | US |