Barbed tape

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6601830
  • Patent Number
    6,601,830
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 18, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 5, 2003
    20 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Browne; Lynne H.
    • Garcia; Ernesto
    Agents
    • Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
Abstract
A barrier structure includes a continuous piece of elongated metal tape. The metal tape includes barbs spaced along an elongate body. Each of the barbs is connected securely to a barb root, and each barb root is connected securely to the elongate body. A first region of the elongate body is adjacent to each barb root, and a second region of the elongate body is adjacent to each first region distal from the barb root. A third region of the elongate body adjacent to each second region distal from the first region extends lengthwise from each second region and meets a corresponding third region that is extending lengthwise away from another second region. Each second region extends transversely and inwardly from the adjacent first region and the adjacent third region.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




This invention generally relates to barriers and security fences, and more specifically relates to barbed tape.




2. Background Art




An early form of metal barrier fence was made of barbed wire. This type of barrier has been in use for more than a century, and is typically rather easy to breach. In addition to lacking the visual intimidation common to more modern barbed tape barriers, barbed wire lacks the strength to resist crushing. To defeat its intended purpose, one need only lay some heavy object over the wire strands, thereby providing a walkway over the barrier.




Barbed tape is designed to overcome these deficiencies. It is more visually intimidating than barbed wire, which features short, unimposing barbs. Barbed tape typically employs razor-sharp barb clusters that can be more than two inches in length. The tape is designed to discourage some breach attempts by its appearance alone. Barbed tape barriers also are typically stronger and harder to crush than barbed wire.




A number of variations of barbed tape already exist. Most variations exhibit the same general features-sharp barbs connected to a central metal strip that is curved into a generally helical shape-and introduce various differences designed to improve upon older designs.




One such design is described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,908,484 granted Oct. 13, 1959 to S. Uhl for “BARBED WIRE SPIRAL.” This barrier includes a metallic strip wrapped completely around a supporting wire made of spring quality steel so that only the barbs extend from the wire (i.e., there is no flange along the wire between barbs). Disadvantages of this barrier include the relatively unimposing appearance of the smaller barbs, and the narrow center strip. Also, the coils are relatively weak in vertical compression.




The barbed tape barrier disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,726 granted Apr. 9, 1985 to W. G. Boggs et al. for “BARRIER” consists of a metal strip wrapped part way around a reinforcing wire. The ends of the metal strip, rather than wrapping completely around the wire, extend away from it to form flanges from which the barbs extend. A key feature of this invention is the reduced width of the flange at the barb root intended to open up the tape in those regions so as to increase the penetration capability of the barbs. One deficiency of this barrier is its loss of strength caused by the reduced flange width. Weaker barriers are easier to breach and barriers that collapse easily are less fit for the purpose of preventing the crossing of the barrier.




DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION




Therefore, there existed a need to provide a barbed tape barrier that is both highly resistant to crushing as well as inexpensive and efficient to manufacture. According to the present invention, a barrier structure includes a continuous piece of elongated metal tape. The metal tape includes barb pairs spaced along said tape. Each of the barbs is connected securely to a barb root, and each barb root is connected securely to the elongate body. A first region of the elongate body is adjacent to each barb root, and a second region of the elongate body is adjacent to each first region distal from the barb root. A third region of the elongate body adjacent to each second region distal from the first region extends lengthwise from each second region and meets a corresponding third region that is extending lengthwise away from another second region. Each second region extends transversely and inwardly from the adjacent first region and the adjacent third region.




Thus, the second regions preferably form cutouts. The cutouts can be placed in a variety of locations and can be a variety of shapes, but it is important that they not be placed immediately adjacent to the barb roots. The cutouts aid in the manufacturing process, as will be explained more fully in a subsequent section. Locating the cutouts away from the root of the barbs lends strength to the structure and allows the barrier to be manufactured with less material than would be needed for weaker structures, thereby lowering the manufacturing cost. Locating the cutouts away from the barb roots also provides for a “second cut” when the barbs pierce the skin of a would-be-intruder.




The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS











The preferred embodiments of the present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, where like designations denote like elements.





FIG. 1

is an isometric view of a barrier according to the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a sectional view taken along line


2





2


of FIG.


3


.





FIG. 3

is a broken away view of a barrier according to the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a top plan view of a repeating pattern for forming barbed tape according to the present invention.











MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a barrier


108


includes barbed tape


110


mounted on a wall


112


. Barbed tape


110


preferably includes an elongated strip of metal or metal body


114


, which has been bent slightly along its longitudinal axis in such a way that the strip substantially forms a helix. Barbs


116


extend from opposing sides of body


114


. Preferably the barbs are in clusters of four barbs, with a pair of barbs extending from each side of body


114


. Each pair of barbs includes two barbs


116


extending in each opposing longitudinal direction. The helical structure is optimal for preventing intrusions across the barrier because barbs


116


at the top of barrier


108


extend directly toward a would-be intruder. Structural patterns other than helical are also possible. For example, the structure could be a concertina pattern where adjacent loops of helical coils are attached to one another at specified points on the circumference.




The helical structure is also used to facilitate storage and shipment of barbed tape


110


. During shipment and storage, the helix can be flattened into a coil, in which configuration the user of tape


110


is somewhat shielded from barbs


116


because many of the barbs


116


are on the inside of the coil where they are less likely to penetrate the skin or clothing of the user. Barbed tape


110


is deployed by stretching it from its coiled form and attaching it to wall


112


or some other structure it is intended to protect, in which configuration barbs


116


are arranged so that some directly confront an approaching person while some lie at various other angles to wall


112


being protected. In this way barbed tape


110


presents an intimidating array of barbs


116


in all directions. The mere appearance of this array may be enough to discourage some breach attempts.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, body


114


preferably defines an elongate channel


130


that runs the entire length of barbed tape


110


. Preferably, channel


130


describes an arc. Opposing elongate flanges


132


extend transversely outwardly in substantially the same plane from opposing sides of the opening of channel


130


. Channel


130


preferably receives a reinforcing wire


134


. Channel


130


is typically about 0.125 inch in depth and roughly the same distance from edge to edge. Typically, the channel extends about 220-240 degrees around wire


134


so as to inclose wire


134


within channel


130


and hold wire


134


in place by pressure from the walls of channel


130


.




Wire


134


can be made from a wide range of materials. As an example, stainless steel may be used both for the reinforcing wire


134


and for the barbed tape


110


that forms the rest of the barrier


108


. This material is strong, resistant to corrosion, and relatively inexpensive, making it an ideal material for use in an outdoor security barrier. However, many other types of metal could be used for wire


134


and for barbed tape


110


.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, flanges


132


typically extend roughly 0.25 inch away from channel


130


and run along the entire length of tape


110


. At regular intervals along tape


110


, barbs


116


extend transversely from flanges


132


. More specifically, a barb root or root portion


136


extends transversely from a flange


132


and preferably branches into a pair of barbs or tapering portions


116


with each barb


116


of the pair of barbs extending in an opposing longitudinal direction. Each barb


116


terminates in a point


138


distal from the barb root


136


. Preferably, barbs


116


are formed in clusters of four barbs, with a pair of longitudinally aligned barb roots


136


extending in opposing directions from opposing flanges


132


. However, barb roots


136


may be longitudinally offset so that barbs


116


are in clusters of two, rather than four. Also, it is possible that barbs


116


only extend from one side of tape


110


, rather than from two opposing sides.




Each barb root


136


is longitudinally bounded by two first regions


150


of flange


132


of body


114


that are each adjacent to the barb root


136


. Each first region


150


of flange


132


extends longitudinally to a second region


152


. Each second region


152


preferably extends transversely inwardly to form an arcuate cutout in each flange


132


. Each second region


152


extends longitudinally from the adjacent first region


150


to an adjacent third region


154


that is distal from first region


150


. Thus second region


152


is between first region


150


and third region


154


. Third region


154


extends longitudinally from second region


152


to an adjoining third region


154


. The adjoining third region


154


extends to another second region


152


, which extends to another first region


150


, which extends to another barb root


136


. This pattern preferably repeats along the length of each side of barbed tape


110


. Each flange


132


thus has three repeating regions: first region


150


beginning at barb root


136


and extending away from it; second region


152


that preferably forms an arcuate cutout; and third region


154


extending away from the cutout of second region


152


and running into a corresponding third region


154


that extends to the second region


152


near the next barb root


136


. Preferably, the width of all the third regions


154


are the same so that adjoining third regions


154


form a continuous flange region having a substantially constant flange width. In a preferred embodiment, the width of each first region


150


is the same as the width of each third region


154


. However, the width of the first regions may differ from the width of the third regions. A typical longitudinal distance along a second region is about 0.25 inch, although other lengths are also possible and may be more preferable for some types of tape.




Barb roots


136


are extensions of flanges


132


and typically have a width of at least 0.25 inch. Each barb root


136


preferably feeds smoothly into the central, shared portion


160


of a barb pair and each barb


116


of the pair then points away from the central portion


160


, in a direction opposite to the pair's other barb


116


, on a line parallel to the longitudinal axis of barbed tape


110


. Barbs


116


may be more than an inch long and taper to very sharp, needle-like points


138


that easily penetrate a person's skin or clothing. As discussed above, barb pairs, in the preferred embodiment, are arranged in barb clusters including two barb pairs each, one barb pair lying on either side of body


114


. These barb clusters may be spaced about every three inches along the length of barbed tape


110


. This arrangement of barb pairs and barb clusters creates an imposing and effective barrier that quickly stops or deters most would-be breach attempts.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, the present invention is manufactured by starting with a sheet


210


of metal such as stainless steel whose width is determined according to the number of barbed tape strips desired for simultaneous manufacture; a typical five strip production run may use a metal blank roughly four inches wide. Preferably, a pattern formed in sheet


210


includes several barbed tapes


110


that are parallel, wherein each barb


116


abuts an adjacent third region


154


of a body


114


so that each barb pair extends between adjacent second regions


152


. Thus, the longitudinal distance between second regions


152


(and thus along adjoining third regions


154


) is preferably equal to the distance between opposing barb points


138


of barbs


116


of a barb pair. In forming tapes


110


from sheet


210


, dies are used to stamp out oblong regions


220


of the metal that will define each first region


150


, each second region


152


, each barb root


136


, and the edge of each barb


116


that faces its body


114


. Then, sheet


210


is sheared along each shear line


230


that separates each barb


116


from an abutting third region


154


. Preferably, the edge of each shear tool extends from shear line


230


into the cutout formed by each second region


152


, thereby completely shearing each tape


110


from adjacent tapes


110


and forming sharp barb points


138


. Thus, the cutting tool is able to form a razor-sharp barb point


138


on each barb while making a clean cut between each strip of tape


110


. The cutout at each second region


152


prevents the cutting tool from leaving behind a sliver that would require manual removal while dulling the points of the barbs. The cutout at each second region


152


also increases the allowable tolerances of the shearing and stamping tools.




Referring back to

FIGS. 1-3

, after the strips of barbed tape


110


have been cut out and separated, preferably channels


130


are formed about reinforcing wire


134


and barbed tape


110


is wound into coils. After receiving a shipment of the barbed tape


110


, the user stretches the barbed tape into its operational, helical shape along a wall or other structure.




It is an important feature of this invention that the cutouts not be located immediately adjacent to the barb roots


136


; therefore the stamping dies are shaped to provide a cutout some distance away from each barb root


136


. Having the cutout away from the barb root produces more rigidity in tape


110


, and especially increases the rigidity of each barb root


136


. Because of the increased rigidity, the width of each third region


154


of body


114


may be decreased, thereby decreasing the amount of material needed.




The strength imparted by these measures allows the invention to withstand the breach attempts that would topple many of the earlier versions of barbed tape barriers. Additionally, the cutout second regions


152


produce a “second cut” when contacted by a would-be-intruder. A first cut is made when barb point


138


initially penetrates the skin, and a second cut is made when the skin contacts the ridge between second region


152


and first region


150


.




Alternatively, the barrier structure may be manufactured without reinforcing wire


134


. In this embodiment the tape includes a smaller channel because omitting the wire eliminates the need to bend the channel around the wire. Typically, without a reinforcing wire, the channel formed within the metal strip need only describe a


180


degree arc, thus allowing the flanges to be wider while using the same amount of material or equally as wide while using less material. Wider flanges significantly increase the axial strength (due to force directed downwardly on the top of the tape helix) of barbed tape


110


because it increases the polar moment of inertia of the tape. Thus, removing the wire can actually add to the barrier's strength while avoiding an increase in cost, or decrease the cost without producing a corresponding decrease in strength.




As shown in

FIG. 3

by the dotted line at line


150


, the first region has a predetermined width. Similarly, at the dotted lines at


152


and


154


show the predetermined width of the second and third region, respectively.




While the width of flange


132


in first region


150


and third region


154


may be equal, preferably the width of flange


132


in third region


154


is less than the width of flange


132


in first region


150


. In fact, the flange may be eliminated altogether in third region


154


so that the body of the tape in the third region


154


and second region


152


wrap entirely around the reinforcing wire. Thus, in this embodiment, no flange is formed other than first region


150


and the barbs themselves. In this embodiment, the width of the flange in second region


152


and in third region


154


would be equal because there would be no flange in second region


152


or third region


154


. However, in such an embodiment, second region


152


still extends transversely and inwardly (i.e., into the material) from the adjacent first region


150


and the adjacent third region


154


. Whether the strength of the tape comes from the wider flange or the reinforcing wire, the barrier of this invention is stronger than previous barrier structures.




Second region


152


may be located at any of several distances from barb root


136


and it may form any of several shapes. Also, first region


150


and third region


154


need not be the same width. However, second region


152


forms a cutout and thus has a reduced width relative to first region


150


and third region


154


. The cutout of second region


152


should extend transversely inwardly at least about 0.002 inch, and it preferably extends transversely inwardly about 0.06 inch.




While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, it will be understood that the precise location of the cutout is less important than that it be placed some distance away from the barb root. Additionally, the length of the barbs, the width of the barb roots, the spacing of barb clusters, the dimensions of the cutouts and the channel, and the precise arrangement of barbs, barb pairs, and barb clusters are all capable of being modified to some extent without exceeding the scope of this invention.



Claims
  • 1. A barrier structure comprising a continuous piece of elongated metal tape, said metal tape comprising:an elongate body defining a longitudinally extending channel and an elongate flange extending transversely from each side of said channel; barb roots spaced along said tape and secured to said flanges; a pair of tapered barbs secured to a barb root, said pair of tapered barbs extending in opposing longitudinal directions, and each of said tapered barbs forming a barb point; a first region of said elongate body adjacent to the barb root; a second region of said elongate body adjacent to the first region distal from the adjacent barb root; a third region of said elongate body adjacent to the second region distal from said first region, the third region extending lengthwise from the second region and meeting a corresponding third region extending lengthwise away from another second region; wherein the second region extends transversely and inwardly from said first region to the third region; wherein a width of the flanges in the first region is greater than a width of the flanges in the second region, and wherein a width of the flanges in the third region is greater than the width of the flanges in the second region; and wherein a width of the flanges in the first region is equal to the width of the flanges in the third region.
  • 2. A barrier structure comprising a continuous piece of elongated metal tape, said metal tape comprising:an elongate body defining a longitudinally extending channel and an elongate flange extending transversely from each side of said channel; barb roots spaced along said tape and secured to said flanges; a pair of tapered barbs secured to a barb root, said pair of tapered barbs extending in opposing longitudinal directions, and each of said tapered barbs forming a barb point; a first region of said elongate body adjacent to the barb root; a second region of said elongate body adjacent to the first region distal from the adjacent barb root; a third region of said elongate body adjacent to the second region distal from said first region, the third region extending lengthwise from the second region and meeting a corresponding third region extending lengthwise away from another second region; wherein the second region extends transversely and inwardly from said first region to the third region; and wherein the width of the flanges in the first region is greater than the width of the flanges in each third region.
  • 3. The structure of claim 1, wherein the flanges extend along the first region, the second region and the third region.
  • 4. The structure of claim 1, wherein the first region extends away from said barb root a distance of approximately 0.25 inch.
  • 5. A barrier structure comprising a continuous piece of elongated metal tape, said metal tape comprising:an elongate body defining a longitudinally extending channel and an elongate flange extending transversely from each side of said channel; barb roots spaced along said tape and secured to said flanges; a pair of tapered barbs secured to a barb root, said pair of tapered barbs extending in opposing longitudinal directions, and each of said tapered barbs forming a barb point; a first region of said elongate body adjacent to the barb root; a second region of said elongate body adjacent to the first region distal from the adjacent barb root; a third region of said elongate body adjacent to the second region distal from said first region, the third region extending lengthwise from the second region and meeting a corresponding third region extending lengthwise away from another second region; wherein the second region extends transversely and inwardly from said first region to the third region; and wherein the second region comprises an arcuate cutout.
  • 6. The structure of claim 1, wherein said channel receives a reinforcing wire, said reinforcing wire being held in place by pressure exerted by walls of said channel.
  • 7. The structure of claim 6, wherein said channel describes an arc extending between the flanges, the arc extending about 220°.
  • 8. The structure of claim 1, wherein each pair of barbs is part of a cluster of four barbs, each cluster of four barbs comprising a pair of barbs extending from each of said flanges.
  • 9. The structure of claim 1, wherein the tape substantially forms a helix.
  • 10. A barrier structure comprising a continuous piece of elongated metal tape, said metal tape comprising:an elongate body defining a longitudinally extending channel and an elongate flange extending transversely from each side of said channel; barb roots spaced along said tape and secured to said flanges; a pair of tapered barbs secured to a barb root, said pair of tapered barbs extending in opposing longitudinal directions, said tapered barbs forming a barb point; a first region of said elongate body adjacent to the barb root; a second region of said elongate body adjacent to the first region distal from the adjacent barb root; a third region of said elongate body adjacent to the second region distal from said first region, the third region extending lengthwise from the second region and meeting a corresponding third region extending lengthwise away from another second region; wherein the second region extends transversely and inwardly from said first region to said third region; wherein the tapered barb pair is part of a cluster of four barbs, each cluster of four barbs comprising a pair of tapered barbs extending from each of said flanges; wherein the tape substantially forms a helix; and wherein a width of the flanges in the first region is greater than a width of the flanges in the second region, and wherein a width of each of the flanges in the third region is greater than a width of the flanges in the second region.
  • 11. The structure of claim 10, wherein said channel receives a reinforcing wire, wherein said channel describes an arc extending between the flanges, the arc extending about 220°, and wherein said reinforcing wire is held in place by pressure exerted by walls of said channel.
  • 12. The structure of claim 10, wherein said width of the flanges in the first region is equal to said width of the flanges in the third region.
  • 13. The structure of claim 10, wherein a width of the flanges in the first region is greater than a width of the flanges in the third region.
  • 14. The structure of claim 10, wherein the flanges extend along the first region, second region, and third region.
US Referenced Citations (34)
Number Name Date Kind
191913 Barnes Jun 1877 A
293411 Brock Feb 1884 A
386742 Grellner Jul 1888 A
538401 Allis Apr 1895 A
782670 Leahy Feb 1905 A
1175433 Goetsch Apr 1916 A
2908132 Klemm Oct 1959 A
2908484 Uhl Oct 1959 A
3010701 Klemm Nov 1961 A
3376120 Hiegel Apr 1968 A
3455539 Loofbourrow Jul 1969 A
3463455 Meckel et al. Aug 1969 A
3480256 Simon et al. Nov 1969 A
3763529 Musgrave Oct 1973 A
3911705 Voorhes Oct 1975 A
3916958 Uhl Nov 1975 A
4028925 Mainiero Jun 1977 A
4040603 Mainiero Aug 1977 A
4045985 Musgrave Sep 1977 A
4204415 Braad et al. May 1980 A
RE30814 Mainiero Dec 1981 E
4503423 Mainiero et al. Mar 1985 A
4509726 Boggs et al. Apr 1985 A
4666129 Dobson May 1987 A
4680573 Ciordinik et al. Jul 1987 A
4818972 Mainiero et al. Apr 1989 A
4844422 Major Jul 1989 A
4884425 Mainiero Dec 1989 A
4887796 Cano et al. Dec 1989 A
4906975 Casella et al. Mar 1990 A
5109583 Pavlov May 1992 A
5194847 Taylor et al. Mar 1993 A
5401002 Major Mar 1995 A
5530430 Pavlov Jun 1996 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
37969 Oct 1981 EP
2259722 Mar 1993 GB
2337279 Nov 1999 GB