This invention relates to heating, ventilating and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems that include at least two zones controlled by sensors, generally thermostats, located within the at least two zones that control corresponding dampers in ducts leading from usually a single HVAC source to the at least two zones.
In a conventional HAVC zoning system, conditioned air can be supplied to a plurality of zones, each zone being controlled by its own thermostat. Zoning systems for such an HVAC system typically includes zone dampers disposed in the ductwork for controlling the air flow of the conditioned air to the zones in response to the thermostat. These zoning systems control the flow of conditioned air to the plurality of zones independently so as to allow for independent control of the zone environments. As a result, at any given time a number of zone dampers may be open or closed. As the temperature in each zone is satisfied, its zone damper will close causing the static pressure in the duct system to rise. This rise in static duct pressure can result in an increase in noise and drafts due, in part, to an increase in air flow velocity though the ducts in zones still calling for conditioned air.
Conventionally, a bypass damper system is used to relieve excess static duct pressure. For example, a bypass damper can be connected between the supply and return air duct. If the bypass damper system determines that the air flow to a supply air duct is causing excess static duct pressure, then the bypass damper will be modulated open to recycle the conditioned air from the supply air duct to the return air duct. This implementation has the disadvantage of being energy inefficient, and hence an expensive way to solve the problem. Bypass dampers can also be expensive to install and difficult to setup. Elimination of the aforementioned bypass damper system could reduce the amount of HVAC system equipment, which, in turn, would reduce installation and maintenance costs.
What is needed is alternative apparatus that can effectively and efficiently control excess static duct pressure without resorting to the use of a bypass damper.
The alternative apparatus can take the form of each zone damper being replaced with a zone damper that, in addition to being controlled by the corresponding zone thermostat, also includes a mechanical portion responsive to the barometric pressure differential in the system to open and bleed a small amount of conditioned air into each zone when the static pressure of the system increases above a selected level.
In a preferred embodiment, the zone damper can include two portions that are hinged to each other to permit independent movement of the two portions relative to each other. A first of the portions can be connected to a damper actuator controlled by a corresponding zone thermostat to open and close in response to the need for conditioned air within the zone. A second of the portions can also be moved by the damper actuator from the closed position to an open position to ensure maximum air flow through the duct in response to the need for conditioned air within the zone. As the first portion moves from the open position to the closed position, the second portion can also move toward the closed position, but may not entirely close if the static pressure differential in the system is too high.
In a preferred embodiment, the second portion of the zone damper can include a counter balance weight, which may be adjustable, to set the desired static pressure differential value that will be allowed. If the system static pressure differential rises above the set desired pressure differential value, the second portion responds by opening sufficiently to reduce the system static pressure differential to the desired value. The counter balance weight and adjustment mechanisms can be of a variety of constructions. A removable access panel can be provided in the zone ducting adjacent to the zone damper to permit access to and adjustment of the counter balance weight to the desired level. Additionally, a lock or stop can be provided to fix the position of the second portion relative to the first portion or to set the maximum deflection of the second portion relative to the first portion in certain situations.
In a further preferred embodiment, the zone damper can include a coupling mechanism between the damper blade and the damper actuator that includes a provision for limited relative movement so that the damper blade can respond to the barometric pressure differential in the system to open and bleed an appropriate amount of conditioned air into each zone when the static pressure of the system increases above a selected level. The coupling mechanism can include a shaft coupled to one of the damper blade and damper actuator and a cylinder surrounding the shaft coupled to another of the damper blade and damper actuator, one of the shaft and cylinder including slot and the other of the shaft and cylinder including a projection into the slot defining limits to the relative movement between the shaft and cylinder. The shaft and cylinder need not be of the same length.
A feature of the disclosed zone dampers is the inclusion of barometrically responsive portions that effectively eliminate the need for any bypass damper system and hence reduce the size of damper inventory. An advantage of the disclosed zone dampers is a reduction in drafts and air noise, and a reduction in coil freeze up, with a resulting increase in system energy efficiency.
Other features and advantages of the present barometric zone damper and the corresponding advantages of those features will become apparent from the following discussion of preferred embodiments, which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of operation. Moreover, in the figures to the extent possible, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The amount of the force acting to close the lower portion 16 can be modified by modifying the size of the weight 26 or by adjusting the position the weight 26 so as to increase or decrease the torque applied to the lower portion 16 as shown in
A variations of the barometric zone damper is shown in
A lock 34 can also be provided to fix the position of the lower portion 16 in relation to the upper portion 14. The lock 34 in
The strap 38 can also take the form shown in
An appreciation of the operation of the barometrically responsive zone dampers 10 can be gained from a consideration of
In the absence of a locking element, or with the locking element situated in an un-locked position allowing relative movement between second portion 16 and first portion 14, the rotation of shaft 18 will still cause a corresponding angular displacement of the portion 14. Portion 16, however, is free to respond to a pressure differential across the damper 10, which if sufficient to overcome the biasing force, will allow portion 16 to open to a relief position R even though portion 14 remains in the closed position C as shown in
With each of the illustrated variations, if the system static pressure differential rises above the set desired pressure value, the lower or second portion 16 of the zone damper 10 can respond by opening sufficiently to reduce the system static pressure to a desired value. In a preferred system, the biasing force supplied by the one or more springs, or by the weights 26, can be such that the second or lower portion 16 of the damper 10 will begin to open independent of the first portion 14 at approximately 0.3″ WC of static pressure. The use of any of the illustrated variations of barometric zone dampers effectively eliminates the need for any bypass damper system.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the shaft 18 could be coupled to the actuator 22, while the cylinder 56 could be coupled to the damper blade 14. It will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the slot 58 could be located on the interior surface of the cylinder 56, while the projection 60 could project outward from the shaft 18 into the slot. The shaft 18 and cylinder 56 need not be of the same length. While the slot 58 is shown to provide for about 90° of relative movement between the shaft and cylinder, the scope of relative movement is subject to some choice of design and may be limited or enlarged to provide less or more relative movement. It will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a suitable spring could be substituted for the weight 26 to provide the desired biasing force, the spring being coupled, for example, between the shaft 18 and the cylinder 56.
While these features have been disclosed in connection with the illustrated preferred embodiments, other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art that come within the spirit of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 13/463,952 filed May 4, 2012 now abandoned, which in turn is related to and claims all benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/569,845 filed Dec. 13, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
105925 | Eastman | Aug 1870 | A |
124931 | Boore | Mar 1872 | A |
366493 | Mann | Jul 1887 | A |
1852918 | Chandler et al. | Apr 1932 | A |
2037363 | Branche | Apr 1936 | A |
2164814 | Griffith | Jul 1939 | A |
2259973 | Firehammer | Oct 1941 | A |
2285749 | Stuart | Jun 1942 | A |
2289579 | Klermund et al. | Jul 1942 | A |
2475799 | Moore | Jul 1949 | A |
2487856 | Cunningham | Nov 1949 | A |
2489308 | Miller et al. | Nov 1949 | A |
2514446 | Field | Jul 1950 | A |
2538190 | Crew | Jan 1951 | A |
2546714 | Bataille | Mar 1951 | A |
2627799 | Kurth et al. | Feb 1953 | A |
2654425 | Hayner | Oct 1953 | A |
2692640 | Field | Oct 1954 | A |
2761494 | Field | Sep 1956 | A |
2796082 | Green et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
2978184 | Franks | Apr 1961 | A |
2981172 | Kalman | Apr 1961 | A |
3070345 | Knecht | Dec 1962 | A |
3206119 | Steinen | Sep 1965 | A |
3311302 | Merckle | Mar 1967 | A |
3818814 | Obler et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3971414 | Illing | Jul 1976 | A |
3993096 | Wilson | Nov 1976 | A |
4163415 | Neveux | Aug 1979 | A |
4251024 | Feinberg | Feb 1981 | A |
4294403 | Ammons et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4328926 | Hall, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4355753 | Watanabe | Oct 1982 | A |
4372485 | McCabe | Feb 1983 | A |
4407447 | Sayegh | Oct 1983 | A |
4408581 | Pfalzgraf et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4487214 | Tatum | Dec 1984 | A |
4509499 | Hebert | Apr 1985 | A |
4694851 | Aalto et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4744409 | Berner | May 1988 | A |
4773362 | Wissmann et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4964422 | Ball et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964431 | Ball et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969485 | Ball et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5088388 | Schaefer | Feb 1992 | A |
5113910 | Ball | May 1992 | A |
5195719 | Ball et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201685 | Raisanen | Apr 1993 | A |
5220944 | Burnett et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5249596 | Hickenlooper, III et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5333838 | Garcia-Mallol | Aug 1994 | A |
5345966 | Dudley | Sep 1994 | A |
5584312 | Van Becelaere | Dec 1996 | A |
5669815 | Cakebread | Sep 1997 | A |
5674125 | Xia et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5881995 | Tse et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5944445 | Montgomery | Aug 1999 | A |
6003554 | Magdelyns et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6089464 | Morgan | Jul 2000 | A |
6234208 | Magdelyns et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6364211 | Saleh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446539 | Niessen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481361 | Schindler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6561161 | Geyer | May 2003 | B2 |
6685557 | Hoffe | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6916240 | Morton | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7188481 | DeYoe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7325569 | Denike et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7566264 | Votaw et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7765981 | Lhote et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8136793 | Keller-Staub | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8588983 | Grabinger et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020175307 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20070173192 | Votaw et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080116288 | Takach et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080233861 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090076658 | Kinnis | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090186572 | Farrell | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110247694 | Sheldon et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120028562 | Heim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/218,063, filed Mar. 18, 2014. 16 pps. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130149955 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61569845 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13463952 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 13562859 | US |