This invention relates to barrier devices for vehicular and vessel traffic control, soil erosion containment, impact attenuation and the like which can be interconnected with one another to define a continuous barrier wall structure and/or connected in various combinations to form energy-absorbing cells, and, more particularly, to barrier devices formed of a light weight plastic having side wall which receive and mount external reinforcement structure in the form of a pair of beams each extending along the length of one of the side walls.
A variety of different devices have been developed for absorbing the kinetic energy of impact of colliding automobiles, and for the containment of forces exerted by soil or water. Highway barrier devices, for example, are intended to provide a continuous wall or barrier along the center line of a highway when laid end-to-end to absorb grazing blows from moving vehicles. One commonly used highway barrier is formed of pre-cast reinforced concrete, and is known as the “New Jersey” style barrier. Highway barriers of this type have a relatively wide base including side walls which extend vertically upwardly from the pavement a short distance, then angle inwardly and upwardly to a vertically extending top portion connected to the top wall of the barrier. This design is intended to contact and redirect the wheels of a vehicle in a direction toward the lane of traffic in which the vehicle was originally traveling, instead of the lane of opposing traffic. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,059,362.
One problem with highway barriers of the type described above is the high weight of reinforced concrete. A barrier having a typical length of twelve feet weighs about 2,800-3,200 pounds and requires special equipment to load, unload and handle on site. It has been estimated that for some road repairs, up to 40 percent of the total cost is expended on acquiring, delivering and handling concrete barriers. Additionally, concrete barriers have little or no ability to absorb shock upon impact, and have a high friction factor. This increases the damage to vehicles which collide with such barriers, and can lead to serious injuries to passengers of the vehicle.
In an effort to reduce weight, facilitate handling and shipment, and provide improved absorption of impact forces, highway barriers have been designed which are formed of a hollow plastic container filled with water, sand or other ballast material such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,681,302; 4,773,629; 4,846,306, 5,123,773 and 5,882,140. For example, the '302 patent discloses a barrier comprising a container having a top wall, a bottom wall, opposed side walls and opposed end walls interconnected to form a hollow interior which is filled with water, and having fittings for coupling one barrier to another to form a continuous wall. The container structure is formed of a resilient material which is deformable upon impact and capable of resuming its original shape after being struck. Longitudinally extending, spaced traction spoiler channels are said to reduce the area of potential impact and thus the tendency of the vehicle to climb the walls of the barrier and vault over it into the opposing lane of traffic.
The '629, '306, '773 and '140 patents noted above represent further advances in deformable highway barrier designs. The first two patents disclose barriers which comprise a longitudinally extending container made of semi-rigid plastic which is self-supporting, and has a predetermined shape which is maintained when filled with water, sand or other ballast material. Such devices are connected end-to-end by a key insertable within grooves formed in the end walls of adjacent barriers. Interconnected fill openings are provided which permit adjacent barriers to be filled with water or the like when laid end-to-end.
The '773 and '140 patents disclose further improvements in barrier devices including side walls formed with higher curb reveals, a horizontally extending step and vertical indentations in order to assist in maintaining the structural integrity of the container, and to create internal baffles for dampening movement of water or other fluid within the container interior. Interlocking male and female coupling elements are formed on opposite end walls of the barrier to facilitate end-to-end connection thereof. Additionally, such barriers are formed with channels or openings to permit the insertion of the tines of a fork lift truck therein for easy handling of the barriers.
Despite the improvements in highway barrier designs noted above, some deficiencies nevertheless remain. One concern has been with the ability of a wall of barriers, e.g. individual barriers connected end-to-end, to withstand a direct impact by a speeding vehicle. It has been found that plastic barriers tend to separate from one another at their connections, and in some instances break apart in response to the vehicle impact. Although concrete barriers of the type described above also can break apart during a crash, they are more resistant to that than plastic barriers and there is a need for plastic barriers to demonstrate impact resistance capabilities which more closely approximates those of concrete barriers.
This invention is directed to a barrier device comprising a top wall, a bottom wall, opposed end walls, and, opposed side walls interconnected to form a hollow interior in which a pair of spaced openings are formed which extend between the side walls. An external reinforcement structure is provided to enhance the structural integrity of the barrier device, including first and second beams each extending along one of the side walls which are connected to one another by a mounting device extending through the openings, or, alternatively, are mounted within a seat formed in each side wall between the opposed ends of the barrier device. The beams of one barrier device, in turn, are connected end-to-end with the beams of an adjacent barrier device to form an essentially continuous, interconnected wall of barriers which resist disengagement from one another and exhibit improved resistance to being broken apart upon impact by a vehicle.
The openings extending through the hollow interior are fork lift holes which are sized to receive the tines of a fork lift thus facilitating movement of the barrier device during loading, unloading and assembly. In one presently preferred embodiment of this invention, the external reinforcement structure comprises a first box beam and a second box beam, each generally square in cross section and formed of metal, rubber, composite material or the like. Each box beam is hollow, at least at its opposite ends, in order to receive and mount one end of a connector bar whose other end is mounted within the box beam of an adjacent barrier device. The cross section of the connector bar is sufficiently smaller than that of the box beams to permit at least limited pivotal movement of the connector bar within the beams, and hence, pivotal movement between the adjacent barrier devices.
The two box beams are connected to one another by a pair of brackets each including a plate mounted at each edge to one of a pair of upstanding legs. One bracket is inserted within each of the fork lift holes and has a length dimension such that its ends protrude from the side walls. Each box beam rests atop a protruding end of both brackets and is bolted in place to connect it to the bracket and, in turn, to the box beam on the other side wall. Because the brackets have upstanding legs, clearance is provided within each fork lift hole to receive the tines of a fork lift even with the brackets and box beams in place.
In an alternative embodiment, a pair of box beams similar to those noted above are employed except they are connected to one another by telescoping members associated with each beam. One of the box beams mounts a pair of sleeves extending perpendicular thereto, and the other box beam mounts a pair of arms which align with the sleeves and are inserted therein when the beams are positioned along the side walls. The box beams associated with one barrier device are connected to those of an adjacent barrier by means of telescoping ends of the beams. One end of each beam has a reduced cross sectional area which telescopes into the opposite end of an adjacent beam having a larger cross section. The beams of one barrier device may be connected to the beams of an adjacent barrier device by a friction fit, or with fasteners such as bolts.
Additional embodiments of this invention employ “beams” in the form of hollow or solid slats which are mounted within longitudinally extending seats formed in the side walls of each barrier device between the end walls. Connecting structure is provided to mount the protruding ends of each beam of one barrier device to those of an adjacent barrier device.
In each of the embodiments employing a beam or slat structure extending along the opposed side walls of a barrier device, a ground anchor is preferably employed to assist in retaining the barrier device in position on the roadway or other surface on which it rests. The ground anchor(s) are connected to the beam or slat, or the mounting structure for same, and then are staked or otherwise affixed to the ground.
As noted above, a number of barrier devices may be connected end-to-end to form a barrier wall. At the outermost ends of the wall, the beams or slats of the end most barrier devices are exposed and could present a hazard if impacted by oncoming traffic. An end connector is therefore provided in order to close off the beam or slat ends.
In another aspect of this invention, a rotational molding process is employed to combine crosslinkable high density polyethylene material with polyethylene foaming pellets to form the barrier device noted above with walls having an interior surface covered with a layer of foam. The plastic, polyethylene walls have a thickness on the order of about 0.25 inches, and the foam layer is in the range of about 0.5 to 6 inches in thickness depending upon the amount of foaming pellets used. Fill holes are formed in the top wall of the barrier so that water, sand or other ballast material can be introduced into the hollow interior and into contact with the foam layer. In an alternative embodiment, substantially the entire hollow interior of the barrier is filled with foam material. Preferably, a liquid material is introduced into the hollow interior through one or more of the fill holes, which then cures to form a foam which expands to fill all or a part of the entire volume of the barrier interior.
It has been found that barrier devices filled with foam can be interconnected end-to-end to form a barrier wall which readily floats in water, and the external reinforcement structure adds overall strength, rigidity and resistance to separation and breaking apart of individual barriers within such barrier wall. These floating barrier walls can be used in various naval applications to encircle ships or other assets, or to segregate areas within a port or dock area, as desired.
The structure, operation and advantages of the presently preferred embodiment of this invention will become further apparent upon consideration of the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring initially to
When using the barrier device 10 of this invention as a highway barrier, the hollow interior 24 is preferably filled with a “ballast” material such as water or other liquid, or a flowable solid material such as sand, concrete and the like. For this purpose, the walls 12-22 of barrier device 10 have a thickness in the range of about one-eighth inch to one inch so as to perform satisfactorily in service. The barrier device 10 is preferably in the range of about six to eight feet in length, and, at the wall thickness noted above, has a weight when empty of about 80 to 140 lbs. When filled with a liquid such as water, the overall weight of the barrier is in the range of about 1400 to 2200 lbs. Flowable solid material such as sand and the like increase the weight of barrier 10 further.
For ease of understanding and discussion of the principal aspects of this invention, the various structural elements of the barrier device 10 are described below in relation to their collective performance of a particular function of the barrier 10. These functions include the ability of the barrier 10 to better redirect and control the upper movement of a vehicle upon impact therewith, the ability to resist lateral separation of adjacent barriers 10 when they are joined end-to-end to form an essentially continuous wall, the ability to resist break up or disintegration of individual barriers in response to impact from a vehicle and the ability to float in water.
Control of Vehicle Movement
The control of vehicle movement upon impact with the barrier device 10 of this invention is achieved primarily by the material with which the barrier 10 is constructed, and the configuration of its side walls 20 and 22. Because both side walls 20, 22 are identical in configuration, only side wall 20 is described in detail herein, it being understood that the side wall 22 is formed with the identical structure and functions in the same manner.
The side wall 20 includes a substantially vertically extending curb reveal 26 which extends from the bottom wall 14 to a horizontally extending ledge or step 28 best shown in
Extending upwardly at an acute angle from the step 28 is an intermediate section 30 which terminates at a vertically extending upper section 32. The upper section 32, in turn, extends from the intermediate section 30 to the top wall 12 of barrier 10 which is formed with a pair of fill holes 33 preferably having a diameter in the range of about 3-4 inches. In the presently preferred embodiment, a number of stabilizers 34 are integrally formed in the intermediate section 30, at regularly spaced intervals between the end walls 16, 18. Each stabilizer 34 includes a base 36 and opposed sides 38 and 40. As best seen in
Enhanced control and redirection of the path of a vehicle impacting the barrier device 10 of this invention is achieved with the above-described structure as follows. The increased height of the curb reveal 26 of side wall 20, e.g., nine inches compared to seven inches or less for conventional barriers, is effective to engage and redirect the tires of a vehicle toward the lane in which the vehicle was traveling instead of in a direction toward the barrier 10 or the opposing lane of traffic. The curb reveal 26 is strengthened and reinforced by the presence of the horizontally extending ledge or step 28 and the stabilizers 34.
In the event the vehicle tires nevertheless extend above the curb reveal 26 upon impact, the intermediate and upper sections 30 and 32 are designed to resist further upward movement of the vehicle therealong. While the stabilizers 34 in intermediate section 30 function to add rigidity and stability to the overall barrier 10, the intermediate section 30 is nevertheless designed to at least partially collapse inwardly or buckle in response to the application of an impact force thereto. The extent of inward motion of buckling is controlled, at least to some extent, by the diameter of the fill holes 33 in the top wall 12. When the barrier interior 24 is filled with water, for example, the impact of a vehicle with a barrier side wall 20 or 22 causes such water to displace from the area of contact. Some of the water is forcefully discharged from the interior 24 through the fill holes 33, and the amount of such energy displacement is dependent on the diameter of the holes 33. The greater the diameter, the greater the amount of water displaced, and, hence, the more the barrier side wall 20 or 22 is permitted to buckle. It has been found that a fill hole 33 diameter of about 3-4 inches, noted above, is optimum wherein sufficient buckling of the side walls 20, 22 is permitted for the purposes described below without permanent damage to the barrier 10 upon impact with a vehicle. In the presently preferred embodiment, when the intermediate section 30 buckles inwardly, a pivot point is created about which the upper section 32 can move in a generally downward direction. Consequently, the tire and/or bumper of the vehicle is impacted by the upper section 32 of barrier device 10 and urged downwardly, back toward the pavement or ground along which the vehicle was traveling. This substantially prevents the vehicle from vaulting over the top of the barrier 10 and entering the opposing lane of traffic. Despite such movement of the intermediate and upper sections 30, 32 in response to impact, the material from which barrier device 10 is constructed allows such sections 30, 32 to return to their original shape after deformation.
In the presently preferred embodiment, a drain hole 76 is formed along each of the end walls 18 and 20 thereof near the bottom wall 14 to allow passage of water and the like from one side of the barrier device 10 to the other. Water or other flowable material is introduced into the hollow interior 24 of the barrier device 10 via the fill holes 33 formed in top wall 12. These fill holes 33 can also receive the post of a sign or the like (not shown) extendable into the barrier interior 24. As shown in
Resistance to Barrier Disengagement and Break Up
Another general aspect of the construction of the barrier device 10 of this invention involves a number of elements designed to resist disengagement of adjacent barrier devices 10 and 10′ when they are arranged end-to-end to form an essentially continuous wall, and to resist the break up or disintegration of individual barrier devices 10 and 10′ in response to impact by a vehicle. Two barrier devices 10 and 10′ are depicted in
Each end wall 16 of barriers 10 is formed with an internally extending recess 48 near the bottom wall 14, which receives an outwardly protruding extension 52 formed on the end wall 18 of an adjacent barrier 10. The upper portion of end wall 16 is formed with a slot 56, and the upper portion of end wall 18 is formed with a slot 58. Each slot 56, 58 has an inner, generally cylindrical-shaped portion 59 and a narrower, substantially rectangular-shaped portion 61 at their respective end walls 16, 18. The slots 56, 58 extend from the top wall 12 downwardly to a point near the juncture of the upper section 32 and intermediate section 30.
When two barrier devices 10 and 10′ are oriented end-to-end, with the end wall 16 of one barrier 10 abutting the end wall 18′ of an adjacent barrier 10′, the slots 56, 58 collectively form a barbell-shaped locking channel 60 shown in
Additionally, a pair of hollow channels 68 and 70 are located within the hollow interior 24 of barrier device 10 and extend between the side walls 20, 22. A portion of both channels 68, 70 is located in the intermediate section 30 of each side wall 20, 22, and extends partially into the upper sections 32 thereof. The two channels 68, 70 are positioned in the spaces between the three stabilizers 34 formed in the side walls 20, 22, and provide added internal support to the barrier 10 so that it retains its shape when filled with a ballast material. Each of the channels 68 and 70 define a pass-through hole or opening 72 adapted to receive the tines of a forklift truck to permit handling of the barriers 10.
In the presently preferred embodiment, a drain hole 76 is formed along each of the end walls 18 and 20 thereof near the bottom wall 14 to allow passage of water and the like from one side of the barrier device 10 to the other. Water or other flowable material is introduced into the hollow interior 24 of the barrier device 10 via the fill holes 33 formed in top wall 12. These fill holes 33 can also receive the post of a sign or the like (not shown) extendable into the barrier interior 24. As shown in
With reference to
In order to interconnect the beams 90, 92 of one barrier device 10 to those of an adjacent barrier device 10′, a connector bar 106 is inserted within one open end of each beam 90, 92 and retained in place by bolts 104. The connector bars 106 have a cross sectional area which is sufficiently less than that of the ends of beams 90, 92 to permit pivotal motion of the beams 90, 92 of barrier 10 relative to the beams 90′, 92′ of barrier 10′ as depicted in
Referring now to
Instead of a connector bar 106 used in the embodiment of
Still further embodiments of the external reinforcement structure according to this invention are shown in
Referring initially to
As seen in
Referring now to
Two different structures for connecting the box beams 150 and 150′ of adjacent barriers 10 and 10′ are depicted in
An alternative embodiment of the connecting device between the beams 150 and 150′ of adjacent barriers 10, 10′ is shown in
Referring now to
Another embodiment of this invention wherein a beam or slat is mechanically retained within a seat formed in the side walls 20 and 22 is shown in
It is contemplated that shapes of seats and beams or slats may be employed other than those shown in
Referring now to
As shown in
The embodiment shown in
Referring now to
Flotation of Barrier Devices
With reference to
The method of forming the barrier device 10 with the foam layer 94 forms no part of this invention, and is therefore not discussed in detail herein. Generally, a rotational molding process is employed in which a polyethylene resin and polyethylene foaming pellets are combined in a mold to form the completed barrier. Each of the walls 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 22 is therefore formed of a high density polyethylene using this molding technique, preferably having a thickness on the order of about 0.25 inches. One type of polyethylene resin suitable for forming the plastic walls of the barrier 10 are commercially available from ExxonMobil Chemical under the trademark “PAXON,” Type Numbers 7004 and 7204 rotational molding resins.
One foam material which can be employed in the rotational molding process noted above to form the foam layer 134 is commercially available from Equistar Chemicals, Inc. of Houston, Tex. under the trademark “PETROTHENE.” A structural foam, semi-rigid foam or flexible PETROTHENE foam may be employed in the barrier 10 and 10′ of this invention, whose properties and type numbers are as follows:
In most instances it is contemplated that a semi-rigid foam would be employed to form the foam layer 134, such as PETROTHENE Type No. MSTR008, depending on the particular application for which the barrier device is intended. If additional structural rigidity is required, a denser foam with increased compressive modulus may be used such as PETROTHENE Type No. MSTR005. Further, the overall thickness of the foam layer 134 can be controlled in the molding process to increase or decrease the rigidity of the barrier 10, i.e., the thicker the foam layer 94 the more rigid the walls 12-22.
Referring now to
TYPICAL RESIN PROPERTIES:
MIX RATIO:
TYPICAL REACTION PROPERTIES:
As noted above and shown in
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof.
For example, while the barrier 10 of
Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/764,853 filed Jun. 19, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/082,630 filed Mar. 17, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,002 issued Apr. 1, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/669,998, filed Sep. 24, 2003, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/033,974, filed Dec. 19, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,666,616, issued Dec. 23, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3877681 | Humphrey | Apr 1975 | A |
4059362 | Smith | Nov 1977 | A |
4391077 | Giess | Jul 1983 | A |
4435106 | Forster et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4452431 | Stephens et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4496264 | Casey | Jan 1985 | A |
4553875 | Casey | Nov 1985 | A |
4681302 | Thompson | Jul 1987 | A |
4722513 | Gaillard et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4772155 | Dinitz | Sep 1988 | A |
4773629 | Yodock | Sep 1988 | A |
4946138 | Gaillard et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4946306 | Yodock | Aug 1990 | A |
5030029 | Johnsen | Jul 1991 | A |
5123773 | Yodock | Jun 1992 | A |
5387049 | Duckett | Feb 1995 | A |
5425594 | Krage et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5498101 | Braverman | Mar 1996 | A |
5531540 | Wasserstrom et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5605413 | Brown | Feb 1997 | A |
5882140 | Yodock, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6164865 | McCallum | Dec 2000 | A |
6179516 | Ivey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6428237 | Duckett | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6666616 | Yodock et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669402 | Davis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679649 | Capolupo | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6718672 | Wieringa | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6843614 | Yodock, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848857 | McColl et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6851887 | Lembo | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6951434 | Yodock, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7303353 | Carey | Dec 2007 | B2 |
6863468 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20040057792 | Yodock, III et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090110480 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11764853 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12261116 | US | |
Parent | 11082630 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 11764853 | US | |
Parent | 10033974 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10669998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10669998 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11082630 | US |