The present invention relates generally to a barrier operator, and more particularly, the present invention relates to a gate operator that preferably includes variable rate movement control modes and a panic control override mode circuit to open or close the barrier at a relatively greater rate than typically used to open or close the gate during normal operation for use in, among other things, doors, and windows, during, for example, emergency situations such as a terrorist attack or robbery.
According to U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,867, issued Aug. 24, 1999 to Richmond, barrier or gate operators have become quite popular and are receiving widespread use, both for residential environments and business environments. Frequently, it is desirable to use a gate system for controlling access to a business office, an apartment building, or home. In order to provide either vehicle or pedestrian access, or both, gate operators are frequently employed and control the opening and closing movement of the gate.
Most gate operators usually employ a motor mechanism, such as an electrically or hydraulically powered motor along with one or more connecting arms which connect the motor to the gate in order to provide for an opening and closing driving movement.
As indicated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,940, issued Feb. 9, 1999 to Parsadayan, the gate may swing about a vertical hinge axis to open and close, or may move horizontally along a guide way. The Parsadayan patent describes a control system with a learning mode allowing a human to move the gate either manually or under powered operation with manual control, and during which the control system learns desired accelerations, decelerations, pauses, etc., along with start and finish positions for the gate movement in each direction of movement for the gate between opened and closed positions. Thereafter, during powered operation of the gate by the operator, the desired movement profile taught by a human to the operator during a learning mode experience is replicated. In the event that no preferred gate movement profile is available to the gate operator from a learning mode experience, it uses a default gate movement profile. Various default profiles of gate movement may be stored in memory and may be selected by an owner of the gate.
Other known control or barrier operators provide for (1) opening and closing movement of the gate in response to a signal and further provide a force in opposition to those movements to cushion the impact of the gate against any abutment at the fixed end positions (see the Richmond 867' patent); (2) starting and stopping the barrier at different speeds during travel along different parts of the path of travel such as when the gate encounters an obstruction in the path of the barrier (see U.S. Pat. No. 7,042,183, issued May 9, 2006 to Fitzgibbon et al.), and (3) a device for overcoming opening and closing speed variations in a gate due to mechanical design-related characteristics to achieve a defined and unchanging gate section speed, except during opening and closing (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,859,004, issued Feb. 22, 2005 to Hormann).
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a barrier operator that preferably includes variable rate movement control modes and a panic control override mode to open or close the barrier at a relatively greater rate than typically used to open or close the gate during normal operation for use in, among other things, gates, doors, and windows.
For the purpose of summarizing the invention certain objects and advantages have been described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
One embodiment of the gate closure system of the present invention includes a barrier or gate operator for moving a gate between a gate fully opened position and gate fully closed position. The gate closure system preferably further includes, among other things, a master control board having a central processing unit with input and output points to receive and transmit data associated with movement of the gate. The gate closure system of the present invention further includes a panic control override mode circuit with an input to the master control board.
The panic control override mode circuit input to the master control board negates all gate movement parameters during any portion of the gate's travel path to open or close the gate at a substantially greater rate of speed than typically used to open or close the gate during normal operation. In this regard, once the panic control override mode circuitry is activated, opening or closing of the gate will occur “unconditionally” at a substantially greater rate of speed than the speed used to open or close the gate during normal operation, regardless of the gate's speed, torque, direction of travel (forward or backward), or whether the gate is stationary.
These and other embodiments will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with references to the accompanying Figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner, simply because it is being utilized in conjunction with a detailed description of certain embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, various embodiments of the invention (whether or not specifically described herein) may include novel features, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or which is essential to practicing the invention herein described.
Although the present invention is described herein as it pertains to a gate closure system 5, and more particularly to a gate control operator 10 that provides for variable rate closure modes and a panic control override mode for the “unconditional” opening or closing of a barrier 15 at a relatively greater rate than typically used to open or close the gate during normal operation, persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the invention may be applied or utilized in the control (opening and closing) of a door, window, blinds, or other barrier or closure device.
As shown in
In this regard, the gate closure system 5 preferably further includes, among other things, a master control board 20 having a central processing unit with memory storage, and input and output points to receive and transmit data associated with movement of the gate 15. As shown in
Panic control override mode circuit 50 input to the master control board 20 negates all gate movement parameters during any portion of the gate's travel path to open or close the gate 15 at a substantially greater rate of speed than is typically used to open or close the gate during normal operation. In other words, regardless of the gate's speed, torque, direction of movement (forward or backward), or whether the gate 15 is stationary at the time of the panic control override mode circuit 50 input to the master control board 20, the gate will open or close. In this regard, a typical gate 15 that controls access by persons desiring to passthrough the gate may have a rate of opening or closing of one-foot-per-second (1 foot/sec) during normal operation. Generally, this rate is capable of being adjusted to a greater or lesser degree depending on user preference. However, during an emergency situation, such as a terrorist attack, robbery, environmental disaster, etc., activation of the panic control override mode circuit 50 input to the master control board 20 will preferably cause the gate 15 to open or close at a rate of approximately six (6) to seven (7) feet/second. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the gate closure system 5 described herein could be configured such that the panic control override mode circuit 50 input to the master control board 20 causes the gate 15 to open or close, and that as long as the override mode rate of opening or closing is substantially greater than the rate of gate movement under normal operating conditions, the override mode rate may vary from that indicated above.
A method of effecting movement of a barrier or gate in accordance with the present invention, preferably includes the steps of: (1) energizing a rate control mode circuit during normal operation of the gate; (2) effecting movement of the gate in response to the step of energizing the rate control circuit; (3) overriding the movement of the gate during normal operation by including the step of energizing a panic control override mode circuit; and (4) effecting movement of the gate in response to the step of energizing the panic control override mode circuit at a rate substantially greater than the rate of gate movement during normal operation.
The apparatus and methods of the present invention have been described with some particularity, but the specific designs, constructions and steps disclosed are not to be taken as delimiting of the invention. Obvious modifications will make themselves apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, all of which will not depart from the essence of the invention and all such changes and modifications are intended to be encompassed within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4007557 | Davis et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4887205 | Chon | Dec 1989 | A |
5869940 | Parsadayan | Feb 1999 | A |
5942867 | Richmond | Aug 1999 | A |
6025685 | Parsadayan | Feb 2000 | A |
6092338 | Crowner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6484784 | Weik, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6657409 | Leivenzon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667591 | Mullet et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6806672 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6859004 | Hormann | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7034487 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042183 | Fitzgibbon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7180260 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207142 | Mullet | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7298107 | McMahon | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20030057905 | Fitzgibbon | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076062 | Mullet et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030178962 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040145332 | Hom et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177558 | Parsadayan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070090781 | Keller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 403 983 | Jan 2005 | GB |
3-152083 | Jun 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080129233 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |