In the downhole drilling and completion industry, there is often need to contain fluid within a formation during various operations. Conventionally, a mechanical barrier is put in the system that can be closed to contain the formation fluid when necessary. One example of a system known in the art will use a valve in operable communication with an Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) so that if/when the ESP is pulled from the downhole environment, formation fluids will be contained by the valve. While such systems are successfully used and have been for decades, in an age of increasing oversight and fail safe/failure tolerant requirements, additional systems will be well received by the art.
A completion system, including a barrier valve transitionable between an open position and a closed position; and an upper completion operatively coupled with the barrier valve for mechanically transitioning the barrier valve to the closed position when the upper completion is withdrawn.
A method of operating a completion system, including withdrawing an upper completion, the upper completion operatively coupled to a barrier valve for controlling operation of the barrier valve; and closing the barrier valve mechanically due to the withdrawing.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
In one embodiment the more downhole valve 20 is a hydraulically actuated valve such as an ORBIT™ valve available commercially from Baker Hughes Incorporated, Houston Tex. and the more uphole valve 22 is a mechanically actuated valve such as a HALO™ valve available from the same source. It will be appreciated that these particular valves are merely exemplary and may be substituted for by other valves without departing from the invention.
Control lines 24 are provided to the valve 20 for hydraulic operation thereof. In the illustrated embodiment the lines also have a releasable control line device 28 in line therewith to allow for retrieval of the upper completion 16 apart from the lower completion 12. Also included in this embodiment of the system 10 is a stroker 30 that may be a hydraulic stroker in some iterations.
The components described function together to manage flow between the lower completion 12 and the upper completion 16. This is accomplished in that the valve 20 is settable to an open or closed position (and may be variable in some iterations) based upon hydraulic fluid pressure in the control line 24. The valve 22 is opened or closed based upon mechanical input generated by movement of the upper completion 16, or in the case of the illustration in
Attention is directed to releasable control line devices 28 and
In order to restore production, another system 110 is attached at a downhole end of upper completion 16 and run in the hole. This is illustrated in
Since the valves 20 and 22 will be in the closed position, having been intentionally closed upon preparing to retrieve the upper completion 16, they will need to be opened upon installation of the new system 110. This is accomplished by stabbing a mechanical shiftdown 142 into valve 22 and setting packer 114. The mechanical shiftdown 142 mechanically shifts the valve 22 to the open position. It should be pointed out that, in this embodiment, the mechanical shiftdown 142 does not seal to the valve 22 and as such the inside of the upper completion 16 is in fluidic communication with annular space 146 defined between the packers 14 and 114. Applying pressure to the tubing at this point will result in a pressure buildup that will act on the valve 20 through the string uphole thereof since all valves thereabove, 22, 120 and 122 are in the open position. Referring to
The foregoing apparatus and method for its use allows for the retrieval and replacement of an upper completion without the need for a wet connection. It will be further appreciated in view of the below that certain components, aspects, features, elements, etc. of the above described embodiments can be utilized in other completion systems. For example, as disclosed above, features of the system 10 can be used to enable barrier valves of other systems to “automatically” close when the upper completion is pulled out, i.e., transition to a closed position based upon mechanical movement of the upper completion as taught above.
Referring now to
The system 210 also includes a work string 222 that enables an intermediate completion assembly 224 to be run in. Essentially, the assembly 224 is arranged for functionally replacing the valve 220. That is, while the valve 220 remains physically downhole, the assembly 224 assumes or otherwise takes off at least some functionality of the valve 220, i.e., the assembly 224 provides isolation of the lower completion 214 and the formation and/or portion of the borehole 212 in which the lower completion 214 is positioned. Specifically, in the illustrated embodiment, the assembly 224 in the illustrated embodiment is a fluid loss and isolation assembly and includes a barrier valve 226 and a production packer or packer device 228. By packer device, it is generally meant any assembly arranged to seal an annulus, isolation a formation or portion of a borehole, anchor a string attached thereto, etc. The barrier valve 226 is shown in more detail in
A method of assembling and using the completion 210 according to one embodiment is generally described with respect to
As illustrated in
As depicted in
In order to start production, a production string 254 is run and engaged with the assembly 224 as shown in
Workovers are a necessary part of the lifecycle of many wells. ESP systems, for example, are typically replaced about every 8-10 years, or some other amount of time. Other systems, strings, or components in the upper completion 218 may need to be similarly removed or replaced periodically, e.g., in the event of a fault, damage, corrosion, etc. In order to perform the workover, reverse circulation may be performed by closing a circulation valve 258 and shifting open a hydraulic sliding sleeve 260 of the production string 254. Advantageously, if the production string 254 or other portions in the upper completion 218 (i.e., up-hole of the assembly 224) needs to be removed, removal of that portion will “automatically” revert the barrier valve 226 to its closed position, thereby preventing fluid loss. That is, the same act of pulling out the upper completion string, e.g., the production string 254, the work string 222, etc., will also shift the sleeve 232 into its closed position and isolate the fluids in the lower completion. This eliminates the need for expensive and additional wireline intervention, hydraulic pressure cycling, running and/or manipulating a designated shifting tool, etc. The packer 228 also remains in place to maintain isolation. This avoids the need for expensive and time consuming processes, such as wireline intervention, which may otherwise be necessary to close a fluid loss valve, e.g., the valve 220.
A replacement string, e.g., a new production string resembling the string 254, can be run back down into the same intermediate completion assembly, e.g., the assembly 224. Alternatively, if a long period of time has elapsed, e.g., 8-10 years as indicated above with respect to ESP systems, it may instead be desirable to run in a new intermediate completion assembly, as equipment wears out over time, particularly in the relatively harsh downhole environment. For example, as shown in
Unlike the assembly 224, the assembly 224′ has a shifting tool 262 for shifting the sleeve 232 of the original assembly 224 in order to open the barrier valve 226, which was closed by the shifting tool 256 when the production string 254 was pulled out. As long as the assembly 224′ remains engaged with the assembly 224, the tool 262 will mechanically hold the barrier valve 226 in its open position. In this way, the assembly 224′ can be stacked on the assembly 224 and the barrier valve 226′ will essentially take over the fluid loss functionality of the barrier valve 226 of the assembly 224 by holding the barrier valve 226 open with the tool 262. It is to be appreciated that any number of these subsequent assemblies 224′ could continue to be stacked on each other as needed. For example, a new one of the assemblies 224′ could be stacked onto a previous assembly between the acts of pulling out an old upper completion or production string and running in a new one. In this way, the newly run upper completion or production string will interact with the uppermost of the assemblies 224′ (as previously described with respect to the assembly 224 and the production string 254), while all the other intermediate assemblies are held open by the shifting tools of the subsequent assemblies (as previously described with respect to the assembly 224 and the shifting tool 262).
The shifting tool 230′ also differs from the shifting tool 230 to which it corresponds. Specifically, the shifting tool 230′ includes a seat 264 for receiving a ball or plug 266 that is dropped and/or pumped downhole. By blocking flow through the seat 264 with the plug 266, fluid pressure can be built up in the work string 222′ suitable for setting and anchoring the production packer 228′. That is, pressure was able to be established for setting the original packer 228 because the fluid loss valve 220 was closed, but with respect to
After setting the packer 228′, the string 222′ can be pulled out, thereby automatically closing the sleeve 232′ of the barrier valve 226′ as previously described with respect to the assembly 224 and the work string 222 (e.g., by use of a releasable connection). As previously noted, the original barrier valve 226 remains opened by the shifting tool 262 of the subsequent assembly 224′. As the assembly 224′ has essentially taken over the functionality of the original assembly 224 (i.e., by holding the barrier valve 226 constantly open with the tool 262), a new production string, e.g., resembling the production string 254, can be run in essentially exactly as previously described with respect to the production string 254 and the assembly 224, but instead engaged with the assembly 224′. That is, instead of manipulating the barrier valve 226, the shifting tool (e.g., resembling the tool 256) of the new production string (e.g., resembling the string 254) will shift the sleeve 232′ of the barrier valve 226′ open for enabling production of the fluids from the downhole zones or reservoir.
It is again to be appreciated that any number of the assemblies 224′ can continue to be run in and stacked atop one another. For example, this stacking of the assemblies 224′ can occur between the acts of pulling out an old production string and running a new production string, with the pulling out of each production string “automatically” closing the uppermost one of the assemblies 224′ and isolating the fluid in the lower completion 214. In this way, any number of production strings, e.g., ESP systems, can be replaced over time without the need for expensive and time consuming wireline intervention, hydraulic pressure cycling, running and/or manipulation of a designated shifting tool, etc. Additionally, the stackable nature of the assemblies 224, 224′, etc., enables the isolation and fluid loss hardware to be refreshed or renewed over time in order to minimize the likelihood of a part failure due to wear, corrosion, aging, etc.
It is noted that the fluid loss valve 220 can be substituted, for example, by the assembly 224 being run in on a work string resembling the work string 222′ as opposed to the work string 222. For example, as shown in
As another example, a modified system 210b is illustrated in
It is thus noted that the current invention as illustrated in
In view of the foregoing it is to be appreciated that new completions can be installed with a valve, e.g., the fluid loss valve 220, that requires some separate intervention and/or operation to close the valve during workovers, or, alternatively, according to the systems 210a or 210b, which not only initially isolate a lower completion, e.g., the lower completion 214, but additionally include a barrier valve, e.g., the barrier valve 226, that automatically closes upon pulling out the upper completion, as described above.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/961,954 filed on Dec. 7, 2010, which patent application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3493052 | Evans et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
4274486 | Fredd | Jun 1981 | A |
4382623 | Richardson | May 1983 | A |
4942926 | Lessi | Jul 1990 | A |
5058682 | Pringle | Oct 1991 | A |
5311939 | Pringle | May 1994 | A |
5372193 | French | Dec 1994 | A |
5465787 | Roth | Nov 1995 | A |
5831156 | Mullins | Nov 1998 | A |
5865251 | Rebardi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875852 | Floyd et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6302216 | Patel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352119 | Patel | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6491102 | Leismer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6516886 | Patel | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6598675 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6675893 | Lund | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684950 | Patel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695049 | Ostocke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7152688 | Richards | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7219743 | Wolters et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228914 | Chavers et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7322422 | Patel | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7380609 | Page et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428924 | Patel | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430153 | Fraser et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7487830 | Wolters et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7617876 | Patel et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640977 | Jonas | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7775275 | Patel | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7896079 | Dyer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950454 | Patel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8056628 | Whitsitt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8231947 | Vaidya et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8286713 | Broussard | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8353353 | Reaux | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8813855 | Lake | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030150622 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211768 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040159444 | Wolters et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050092501 | Chavers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050095156 | Wolters et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126789 | Nivens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060151183 | Turner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070084607 | Wright et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070119599 | Chavers et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070227727 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235185 | Patel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070295504 | Patel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090025923 | Patel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078429 | Du et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090218104 | Brown | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100206579 | Guven et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236774 | Patel et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270031 | Patel | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100300702 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110192596 | Patel | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110226479 | Tippel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120138309 | Lake | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120255738 | Lauderdale et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261137 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130075108 | Frisby et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075109 | Frisby et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130087344 | Reid et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130255946 | Frisby et al.. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130255947 | Frisby et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130255958 | Frisby et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130255961 | Frisby et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130306316 | Patel | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011005826 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Great Britain Search Report for GB Application No. 1303095.2, dated Jun. 24, 2013, pp. 1-5. |
K. Munday et al., “Want to Make Tree Operations Safer? Why Not Use the DHSV as a Barrier?”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 96337; Sep. 24, 2006. |
T.A. Nassereddin et al., “Electromagnetic Surface-Controlled Sub-Surface Safety Valve: An Immediate Soluation to Secure Wells with Damaged Control Line”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 138356; Nov. 1, 2010. |
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Advanced Openhole Completions Utilizing a Simplified Zone Isolation System”; Socity of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 77438; Sep. 29, 2002. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2011/063519; Mailed Jul. 30, 2012; Korean Intellecutal Property Office; 8 pages. |
L. Izquierdo et all, “Managing the Retrieval of Triple-Zone Intelligent Completions in Extended-Reach Wells Offshore California”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 112115; Mar. 4, 2008. |
Dwayne Leismer, “A System Approach to Annular Control for Total Well Safety”; Offshore Technology Conference; Paper No. OTC 7349; May 3, 1993. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2013/026856; International Filing Date: Feb. 20, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 30, 2013; 14 pages. |
Non Final Office action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/434,099, notification date Oct. 6, 2014; pp. 1-41. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130075108 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12961954 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13433991 | US |