Base station for use in a CDMA communication system using an antenna array

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6983008
  • Patent Number
    6,983,008
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 6, 2002
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 3, 2006
    20 years ago
Abstract
A base station has a plurality of transmitting antennas. From each transmitting antenna, a reference signal having a code uniquely associated with that antenna is transmitted. A data signal is transmitted such that different spread spectrum versions of the data signal are transmitted from each antenna. Each version has a different code for the respective transmitting antenna.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to signal transmission and reception in a wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) communication system. More specifically, the invention relates to a system and method of transmission using an antenna array to improve signal reception in a wireless CDMA communication system.


2. Description of the Prior Art


A prior art CDMA communication system is shown in FIG. 1. The communication system has a plurality of base stations 2032. Each base station 20 communicates using spread spectrum CDMA with user equipment (UEs) 3438 within its operating area. Communications from the base station 20 to each UE 3438 are referred to as downlink communications and communications from each UE 3438 to the base station 20 are referred to as uplink communications.


Shown in FIG. 2 is a simplified CDMA transmitter and receiver. A data signal having a given bandwidth is mixed by a mixer 40 with a pseudo random chip code sequence producing a digital spread spectrum signal for transmission by an antenna 42. Upon reception at an antenna 44, the data is reproduced after correlation at a mixer 46 with the same pseudo random chip code sequence used to transmit the data. By using different pseudo random chip code sequences, many data signals use the same channel bandwidth. In particular, a base station 20 will communicate signals to multiple UEs 3438 over the same bandwidth.


For timing synchronization with a receiver, an unmodulated pilot signal is used. The pilot signal allows respective receivers to synchronize with a given transmitter allowing despreading of a data signal at the receiver. In a typical CDMA system, each base station 20 sends a unique pilot signal received by all UEs 3438 within communicating range to synchronize forward link transmissions. Conversely, in some CDMA systems, for example in the B-CDMA™ air interface, each UE 3438 transmits a unique assigned pilot signal to synchronize reverse link transmissions.


When a UE 3436 or a base station 2032 is receiving a specific signal, all the other signals within the same bandwidth are noise-like in relation to the specific signal. Increasing the power level of one signal degrades all other signals within the same bandwidth. However, reducing the power level too far results in an undesirable received signal quality. One indicator used to measure the received signal quality is the signal to noise ratio (SNR). At the receiver, the magnitude of the desired received signal is compared to the magnitude of the received noise. The data within a transmitted signal received with a high SNR is readily recovered at the receiver. A low SNR leads to loss of data.


To maintain a desired signal to noise ratio at the minimum transmission power level, most CDMA systems utilize some form of adaptive power control. By minimizing the transmission power, the noise between signals within the same bandwidth is reduced. Accordingly, the maximum number of signals received at the desired signal to noise ratio within the same bandwidth is increased.


Although adaptive power control reduces interference between signals in the same bandwidth, interference still exists limiting the capacity of the system. One technique for increasing the number of signals using the same radio frequency (RF) spectrum is to use sectorization. In sectorization, a base station uses directional antennas to divide the base station's operating area into a number of sectors. As a result, interference between signals in differing sectors is reduced. However, signals within the same bandwidth within the same sector interfere with one another. Additionally, sectorized base stations commonly assign different frequencies to adjoining sectors decreasing the spectral efficiency for a given frequency bandwidth. Accordingly, there exists a need for a system which further improves the signal quality of received signals without increasing transmitter power levels.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A base station has a plurality of transmitting antennas. From each transmitting antenna, a reference signal having a code uniquely associated with that antenna is transmitted. A data signal is transmitted such that different spread spectrum versions of the data signal are transmitted from each antenna. Each version has a different code for the respective transmitting antenna.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a prior art wireless spread spectrum CDMA communication system.



FIG. 2 is a prior art spread spectrum CDMA transmitter and receiver.



FIG. 3 is the transmitter of the invention.



FIG. 4 is the transmitter of the invention transmitting multiple data signals.



FIG. 5 is the pilot signal receiving circuit of the invention.



FIG. 6 is the data signal receiving circuit of the invention.



FIG. 7 is an embodiment of the pilot signal receiving circuit.



FIG. 8 is a least mean squarred weighting circuit.



FIG. 9 is the data signal receiving circuit used with the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 7.



FIG. 10 is an embodiment of the pilot signal receiving circuit where the output of each RAKE is weighted.



FIG. 11 is the data signal receiving circuit used with the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 10.



FIG. 12 is an embodiment of the pilot signal receiving circuit where the antennas of the transmitting array are closely spaced.



FIG. 13 is the data signal receiving circuit used with the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 12.



FIG. 14 is an illustration of beam steering in a CDMA communication system.



FIG. 15 is a beam steering transmitter.



FIG. 16 is a beam steering transmitter transmitting multiple data signals.



FIG. 17 is the data receiving circuit used with the transmitter of FIG. 14.



FIG. 18 is a pilot signal receiving circuit used when uplink and downlink signals use the same frequency.



FIG. 19 is a transmitting circuit used with the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 18.



FIG. 20 is a data signal receiving circuit used with the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 18.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the drawing figures where like numerals represent like elements throughout. FIG. 3 is a transmitter of the invention. The transmitter has an array of antennas 4852, preferably 3 or 4 antennas. For use in distinguishing each antenna 4852, a different signal is associated with each antenna 5660. The preferred signal to associate with each antenna is a pilot signal as shown in FIG. 3. Each spread pilot signal is generated by a pilot signal generator 5660 using a different pseudo random chip code sequence and is combined by combiners 6266 with the respective spread data signal. Each spread data signal is generated using data signal generator 54 by mixing at mixers 378382 the generated data signal with a different pseudo random chip code sequence per antenna 4852, D1–DN. The combined signals are modulated to a desired carrier frequency and radiated through the antennas 4852 of the array.


By using an antenna array, the transmitter utilizes spacial diversity. If spaced far enough apart, the signals radiated by each antenna 4852 will experience different multipath distortion while traveling to a given receiver. Since each signal sent by an antenna 4852 will follow multiple paths to a given receiver, each received signal will have many multipath components. These components create a virtual communication channel between each antenna 4852 of the transmitter and the receiver. Effectively, when signals transmitted by one antenna 4852 over a virtual channel to a given receiver are fading, signals from the other antennas 4852 are used to maintain a high received SNR. This effect is achieved by the adaptive combining of the transmitted signals at the receiver.



FIG. 4 shows the transmitter as used in a base station 20 to send multiple data signals. Each spread data signal is generated by mixing at mixers 360376 a corresponding data signal from generators 7478 with differing pseudo random chip code sequences D11–DNM. Accordingly, each data signal is spread using a different pseudo random chip code sequence per antenna 4852, totaling N×M code sequences. N is the number of antennas and M is the number of data signals. Subsequently, each spread data signal is combined with the spread pilot signal associated with the antenna 4852. The combined signals are modulated and radiated by the antennas 4852 of the array.


The pilot signal receiving circuit is shown in FIG. 5. Each of the transmitted pilot signals is received by the antenna 80. For each pilot signal, a despreading device, such as a RAKE 8286 as shown in the FIG. 5 or a vector correlator, is used to despread each pilot signal using a replica of the corresponding pilot signal's pseudo random chip code sequence. The despreading device also compensates for multipath in the communication channel. Each of the recovered pilot signals is weighted by a weighting device 8892. Weight refers to both magnitude and phase of the signal. Although the weighting is shown as being coupled to a RAKE, the weighting device preferably also weights each finger of the RAKE. After weighting, all of the weighted recovered pilot signals are combined in a combiner 94. Using an error signal generator 98, an estimate of the pilot signal provided by the weighted combination is used to create an error signal. Based on the error signal, the weights of each weighting device 8892 are adjusted to minimize the error signal using an adaptive algorithm, such as least mean squared (LMS) or recursive least squares (RLS). As a result, the signal quality of the combined signal is maximized.



FIG. 6 depicts a data signal receiving circuit using the weights determined by the pilot signal recovery circuit. The transmitted data signal is recovered by the antenna 80. For each antenna 4852 of the transmitting array, the weights from a corresponding despreading device, shown as a RAKE 8286, are used to filter the data signal using a replica of the data signal's spreading code used for the corresponding transmitting antenna. Using the determined weights for each antenna's pilot signal, each weighting device 106110 weights the RAKE's despread signal with the weight associated with the corresponding pilot. For instance, the weighting device 88 corresponds to the transmitting antenna 48 for pilot signal 1. The weight determined by the pilot RAKE 82 for pilot signal 1 is also applied at the weighting device 106 of FIG. 6. Additionally, if the weights of the RAKE's fingers were adjusted for the corresponding pilots signal's RAKE 8286, the same weights will be applied to the fingers of the data signal's RAKE 100104. After weighting, the weighted signals are combined by the combiner 112 to recover the original data signal.


By using the same weights for the data signal as used with each antenna's pilot signal, each RAKE 8286 compensates for the channel distortion experienced by each antenna's signals. As a result, the data signal receiving circuit optimizes the data signals reception over each virtual channel. By optimally combining each virtual channel's optimized signal, the received data signal's signal quality is increased.



FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of the pilot signal recovery circuit. Each of the transmitted pilots are recovered by the receiver's antenna 80. To despread each of the pilots, each RAKE 8286 utilizes a replica of the corresponding pilot's pseudo random chip code sequence, P1–PN. Delayed versions of each pilot signal are produced by delay devices 114124. Each delayed version is mixed by a mixer 126142 with the received signal. The mixed signals pass through sum and dump circuits 424440 and are weighted using mixers 144160 by an amount determined by the weight adjustment device 170. The weighted multipath components for each pilot are combined by a combiner 162164. Each pilot's combined output is combined by a combiner 94. Since a pilot signal has no data, the combined pilot signal should have a value of 1+j0. The combined pilot signal is compared to the ideal value, 1+j0, at a subtractor 168. Based on the deviation of the combined pilot signal from the ideal, the weight of the weighting devices 144160 are adjusted using an adaptive algorithm by the weight adjustment device 170.


A LMS algorithm used for generating a weight is shown in FIG. 8. The output of the subtractor 168 is multiplied using a mixer 172 with the corresponding despread delayed version of the pilot. The multiplied result is amplified by an amplifier 174 and integrated by an integrator 176. The integrated result is used to weight, W1M, the RAKE finger.


The data receiving circuit used with the embodiment of FIG. 7 is show for a base station receiver in FIG. 9. The received signal is sent to a set of RAKEs 100104 respectively associated with each antenna 4852 of the array. Each RAKE 100104, produces delayed versions of the received signal using delay devices 178188. The delayed versions are weighted using mixers 190206 based on the weights determined for the corresponding antenna's pilot signal. The weighted data signals for a given RAKE 100104 are combined by a combiner 208212. One combiner 208212 is associated with each of the N transmitting antennas 4852. Each combined signal is despread M times by mixing at a mixer 214230 the combined signal with a replica of the spreading codes used for producing the M spread data signals at the transmitter, D11–DNM. Each despread data signal passes through a sum and dump circuit 232248. For each data signal, the results of the corresponding sum and dump circuits are combined by a combiner 250254 to recover each data signal.


Another pilot signal receiving circuit is shown in FIG. 10. The despreading circuits 8286 of this receiving circuit are the same as FIG. 7. The output of each RAKE 8286 is weighted using a mixer 256260 prior to combining the despread pilot signals. After combining, the combined pilot signal is compared to the ideal value and the result of the comparison is used to adjust the weight of each RAKE's output using an adaptive algorithm. To adjust the weights within each RAKE 8286, the output of each RAKE 8286 is compared to the ideal value using a subtractor 262266. Based on the result of the comparison, the weight of each weighting device 144160 is determined by the weight adjustment devices 268272.


The data signal receiving circuit used with the embodiment of FIG. 10 is shown in FIG. 11. This circuit is similar to the data signal receiving circuit of FIG. 9 with the addition of mixers 274290 for weighting the output of each sum and dump circuit 232248. The output of each sum and dump circuit 232248 is weighted by the same amount as the corresponding pilot's RAKE 8286 was weighted. Alternatively, the output of each RAKE's combiner 208212 may be weighted prior to mixing by the mixers 214230 by the amount of the corresponding pilot's RAKE 8286 in lieu of weighting after mixing.


If the spacing of the antennas 4852 in the transmitting array is small, each antenna's signals will experience a similar multipath environment. In such cases, the pilot receiving circuit of FIG. 12 may be utilized. The weights for a selected one of the pilot signals are determined in the same manner as in FIG. 10. However, since each pilot travels through the same virtual channel, to simplify the circuit, the same weights are used for despreading the other pilot signals. Delay devices 292294 produce delayed versions of the received signal. Each delayed version is weighted by a mixer 296300 by the same weight as the corresponding delayed version of the selected pilot signal was weighted. The outputs of the weighting devices are combined by a combiner 302. The combined signal is despread using replicas of the pilot signals' pseudo random chip code sequences, P2–Pn, by the mixers 304306. The output of each pilot's mixer 304306 is passed through a sum and dump circuit 308310. In the same manner as FIG. 10, each despread pilot is weighted and combined.


The data signal recovery circuit used with the embodiment of FIG. 12 is shown in FIG. 13. Delay devices 178180 produce delayed versions of the received signal. Each delayed version is weighted using a mixer 190194 by the same weight as used by the pilot signals in FIG. 12. The outputs of the mixers are combined by a combiner 208. The output of the combiner 208 is inputted to each data signal despreader of FIG. 13.


The invention also provides a technique for adaptive beam steering as illustrated in FIG. 14. Each signal sent by the antenna array will constructively and destructively interfere in a pattern based on the weights provided each antenna 4852 of the array. As a result, by selecting the appropriate weights, the beam 312316 of the antenna array is directed in a desired direction.



FIG. 15 shows the beam steering transmitting circuit. The circuit is similar to the circuit of FIG. 3 with the addition of weighting devices 318322. A target receiver will receive the pilot signals transmitted by the array. Using the pilot signal receiving circuit of FIG. 5, the target receiver determines the weights for adjusting the output of each pilot's RAKE. These weights are also sent to the transmitter, such as by using a signaling channel. These weights are applied to the spread data signal as shown in FIG. 15. For each antenna, the spread data signal is given a weight by the weighting devices 318322 corresponding to the weight used for adjusting the antenna's pilot signal at the target receiver providing spatial gain. As a result, the radiated data signal will be focused towards the target receiver. FIG. 16 shows the beam steering transmitter as used in a base station sending multiple data signals to differing target receivers. The weights received by the target receiver are applied to the corresponding data signals by weighting devices 324340.



FIG. 17 depicts the data signal receiving circuit for the beam steering transmitter of FIGS. 15 and 16. Since the transmitted signal has already been weighted, the data signal receiving circuit does not require the weighting devices 106110 of FIG. 6.


The advantage of the invention's beam steering are two-fold. The transmitted data signal is focused toward the target receiver improving the signal quality of the received signal. Conversely, the signal is focused away from other receivers reducing interference to their signals. Due to both of these factors, the capacity of a system using the invention's beam steering is increased. Additionally, due to the adaptive algorithm used by the pilot signal receiving circuitry, the weights are dynamically adjusted. By adjusting the weights, a data signal's beam will dynamically respond to a moving receiver or transmitter as well as to changes in the multipath environment.


In a system using the same frequency for downlink and uplink signals, such as time division duplex (TDD), an alternate embodiment is used. Due to reciprocity, downlink signals experience the same multipath environment as uplink signals send over the same frequency. To take advantage of reciprocity, the weights determined by the base station's receiver are applied to the base station's transmitter. In such a system, the base station's receiving circuit of FIG. 18 is co-located, such as within a base station, with the transmitting circuit of FIG. 19.


In the receiving circuit of FIG. 18, each antenna 4852 receives a respective pilot signal sent by the UE. Each pilot is filtered by a RAKE 406410 and weighted by a weighting device 412416. The weighted and filtered pilot signals are combined by a combiner 418. Using the error signal generator 420 and the weight adjustment device 422, the weights associated with the weighting devices 412416 are adjusted using an adaptive algorithm.


The transmitting circuit of FIG. 19 has a data signal generator 342 to generate a data signal. The data signal is spread using mixer 384. The spread data signal is weighted by weighting devices 344348 as were determined by the receiving circuit of FIG. 19 for each virtual channel.


The circuit of FIG. 20 is used as a data signal receiving circuit at the base station. The transmitted data signal is received by the multiple antennas 4852. A data RAKE 392396 is coupled to each antenna 4852 to filter the data signal. The filtered data signals are weighted by weighting devices 398402 by the weights determined for the corresponding antenna's received pilot and are combined at combiner 404 to recover the data signal. Since the transmitter circuit of FIG. 19 transmits the data signal with the optimum weights, the recovered data signal at the UE will have a higher signal quality than provided by the prior art.

Claims
  • 1. A base station having a plurality of transmitting antennas, the base station comprising: means for transmitting from each transmitting antenna, a reference signal having a code uniquely associated with that antenna, wherein the transmitted reference signals are not delayed with respect to each other; andmeans for transmitting a data signal such that different spread spectrum versions of the data signal are transmitted from each antenna, each data signal version having a different code for the respective transmitting antenna and the data signal versions are not transmission channel compensation processed; andwherein the base station transmissions are in a time division duplex format and weights derived from received versions of the reference signals are used to weight received versions of the data signal versions prior to combining the weighted received data signal versions.
  • 2. The base station of claim 1 wherein the means for transmitting a data signal transmits a plurality of data signals, such that spread spectrum versions of each data signal are transmitted from each antenna, each version having a different code for the respective transmitting antenna.
  • 3. The base station of claim 2 wherein each version has a different code than the code for any of the versions of the plurality of data signals.
  • 4. A base station comprising: a plurality of transmitting antennas for transmitting a plurality of reference signals and data signal versions, each transmitting antenna operatively coupled to a reference signal generator and a mixer, wherein the transmitted reference signals are not delayed with respect to each other and the data signal versions are not transmission channel compensation processed;a plurality of reference signal generators, each reference signal generator generating a code uniquely associated with its operatively coupled to antenna;a data signal generator for producing a data signal; anda plurality of mixers for producing the plurality of the data signal versions, each mixer for mixing the data signal with a different code to produce one of the versions for that mixer's coupled to antenna; andwherein the base stations transmissions are in a time division duplex format and weights derived from received versions of the reference signals are used to weight received versions of the data signal versions prior to combining the weighted received data signal versions.
  • 5. The base station of claim 4 further comprising at least one additional data signal generator for producing at least one additional data signal; for each at least one additional data signal generator, a plurality of mixers for producing a plurality of versions of that at least one additional data signal, each version having a different code for transmission over a respective transmitting antenna of the transmitting antennas.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/602,963, filed on Jun. 23, 2000, which issued on Apr. 16, 2002 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,373,877; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/394,452 filed on Sep. 10, 1999, which issued on Sep. 5, 2000 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,115,406.

US Referenced Citations (60)
Number Name Date Kind
3662268 Gans et al. May 1972 A
4736460 Rilling Apr 1988 A
4901307 Gilhousen et al. Feb 1990 A
5146475 Kubo Sep 1992 A
5319677 Kim Jun 1994 A
5331666 Dent Jul 1994 A
5381443 Borth et al. Jan 1995 A
5457704 Hoeher et al. Oct 1995 A
5493563 Rozanski et al. Feb 1996 A
5623511 Bar-David et al. Apr 1997 A
5652764 Kanzaki et al. Jul 1997 A
5673294 Namekata Sep 1997 A
5680419 Bottomley Oct 1997 A
5694388 Sawahashi et al. Dec 1997 A
5757791 Kanterakis et al. May 1998 A
5809020 Bruckert et al. Sep 1998 A
5812542 Bruckert et al. Sep 1998 A
5822380 Bottomley Oct 1998 A
5822701 Tomisato et al. Oct 1998 A
5886987 Yoshida et al. Mar 1999 A
5903834 Wallstedt et al. May 1999 A
5952968 McDowell Sep 1999 A
5982327 Vook et al. Nov 1999 A
5991332 Lomp et al. Nov 1999 A
6009074 Kim et al. Dec 1999 A
6026130 Rahmatullah et al. Feb 2000 A
6044120 Bar-David et al. Mar 2000 A
6067324 Harrison May 2000 A
6069884 Hayashi et al. May 2000 A
6081566 Molnar et al. Jun 2000 A
6108517 Arslan et al. Aug 2000 A
6147985 Bar-David et al. Nov 2000 A
6148041 Dent Nov 2000 A
6154443 Huang et al. Nov 2000 A
6160801 Uchida et al. Dec 2000 A
6161209 Moher Dec 2000 A
6215762 Dent Apr 2001 B1
6335954 Bottomley et al. Jan 2002 B1
6459740 Lo Oct 2002 B1
6470047 Kleinerman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470192 Karlsson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6483866 Suzuki Nov 2002 B1
6484285 Dent Nov 2002 B1
6501788 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501803 Alamouti et al. Dec 2002 B1
6556634 Dent Apr 2003 B1
6647070 Shalvi et al. Nov 2003 B1
6694154 Molnar et al. Feb 2004 B1
6697441 Bottomley et al. Feb 2004 B1
6731700 Yakhnich et al. May 2004 B1
20010030993 Bottomely et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020003846 Khayrallah et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020122510 Yakhnich et al. May 2002 A1
20020150187 Chugg et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154704 Reshef Oct 2002 A1
20020181430 Thomas et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030013468 Khatri Jan 2003 A1
20030053524 Dent Mar 2003 A1
20030058929 Cox et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030092456 Dent May 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
0 675 455 Oct 1994 EP
0 715 421 Jun 1996 EP
07 55 127 Jan 1997 EP
0755127 Jan 1997 EP
0 820 157 Jan 1998 EP
08 81 781 Dec 1998 EP
0881781 Dec 1998 EP
0 892 508 Jan 1999 EP
08 99 894 Mar 1999 EP
0899894 Mar 1999 EP
22 80 575 Feb 1995 GB
2280575 Feb 1995 GB
9401956 Jan 1994 WO
9534140 Dec 1995 WO
9611533 Apr 1996 WO
9713386 Apr 1997 WO
9904537 Jan 1999 WO
9912283 Mar 1999 WO
9952311 Oct 1999 WO
0035159 Jun 2000 WO
0044141 Jul 2000 WO
0048330 Aug 2000 WO
0069192 Nov 2000 WO
0105088 Jan 2001 WO
0128174 Apr 2001 WO
0145289 Jun 2001 WO
0209297 Jan 2002 WO
0223787 Mar 2002 WO
02065719 Aug 2002 WO
02067444 Aug 2002 WO
02084892 Oct 2002 WO
03003604 Jan 2003 WO
03010899 Feb 2003 WO
04012341 Feb 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020094016 A1 Jul 2002 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09602963 Jun 2000 US
Child 10068718 US
Parent 09394452 Sep 1999 US
Child 09602963 US