This patent application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/733,232 filed on Jan. 2, 2020, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
High performance baseball and softball bats, hereinafter referred to simply as “baseball bats” or “bats”, are primarily made from aluminum alloys, composite materials, or some combination thereof. These bats are tubular (hollow inside) so as to optimize their weight and they consist of three sections: a relatively narrow handle portion for gripping, a relatively wider distal portion for hitting, and a tapered mid-section connecting the handle and hitting portions. Original aluminum bats were fabricated as a single piece in that they solely consisted of a frame with nothing occupying the space within the frame. It was found that these bats outperformed traditional wooden bats because of a “rebound” effect present in aluminum/composite bats. As the ball impacted the bat, the bat wall would absorb the energy from the impact by elastically deforming the wall at the point of impact. As the ball began to leave the bat the energy absorbed by the elastic deformation would be released by the wall returning to its original structure, in effect giving the ball an extra “push”, thus the rebound effect. Another name given to this effect is the “trampoline” effect. Manufacturers of bats found that by making the wall thinner the rebound effect would be magnified. However thinner walls also decreased the life of the bat as the wall would fatigue and no longer return to its original position; leaving dents or dings on the bat. As a result manufacturers begin to look at ways of utilizing the cavity within the hitting portion of the bat to increase the rebound effect and reduce fatigue.
A number of designs were introduced to take advantage of the space available in the cavity of the bat's hitting portion with the goal of strengthening the hitting portion while maintaining or improving the rebound effect. Some designs would decrease the width of the cavity so as to add an outer tubular sleeve while other designs would add tubular inserts within the cavity of the bat's hitting portion. These designs became to be known as multi-walled bats. Still other designs added composites to the outer wall or disks within the cavity to strengthen the wall while maintaining its flexing properties. These designs continued to be known as single wall bats. As this disclosure is for a bat with a novel method of utilizing a tubular insert this discussion will focus on multiwall bat disclosures.
Multiwall bat designs may be broken down into two groups. The first group have walls that are distinct from each other yet each wall directly and continuously adjoins adjacent walls. Although the walls may flex independently from each other the fact that they adjoin one another only allows for minor improvements to the rebound effect. The second group have walls where a gap(s) between the walls have been purposefully incorporated. The gap(s) allow for greater independent flexing of the walls with a corresponding greater improvement of the rebound effect so that the rebound effect may increase more linearly.
Examples of bats with multiple walls that directly abuts one another include U.S. Pat. No. 5,303,917 to Uke and U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,017 to Anderson which both discloses a bat with a sleeve over the outside of the hitting portion that directly and continuously adjoins the frame of the bat's hitting portion. Examples of bats with internal walls, referred to as inserts, includes U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,095 to Easton which discloses an internal insert bonded to the inside of the external metal tube and running the full length of the hitting portion of the bat and U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,836 to Misono et al. which discloses an internal insert with a weak boundary layer so as to encourage some amount of independent flexing. The advantage of these designs is simplicity in manufacturing. Since the walls directly and continuously adjoin each other they are less likely to separate. However this simplicity comes at a cost to performance as less energy is absorbed from the ball's impact with the bat resulting in a less than desired rebound effect.
Examples of bats with multiple walls that incorporate some sort of gap between the walls include U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,398 to Eggiman which discloses a bat with a tubular insert that is placed within the bat's hitting portion. The outside diameter of the insert is smaller than the inside diameter of the bat's outer shell so that there exists an annular gap between the two. The outside shell and tubular insert are therefore able to flex independently and, by so doing, together act as a leaf spring, resulting in greater bat performance. To prevent the insert from moving about within the frame it is secured by friction fit or fasteners. Another example is U.S. Pat. No. 6,612,945, also to Anderson, that contains a spiral inspired textured insert that makes contact with the bat's frame at each apex of the spiral. While the two walls are not as independent as the Eggiman patent they do act with greater independence than walls that directly and continuously adjoin one another. The spiral inspired textured insert is seated against a buttress at one end of the hitting portion and secured by the bat's end cap at the opposite end of the hitting portion. A final example is U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,381 to Watari et al. which discloses a bat with sleeve that fits over the outside of the hitting portion with an inside diameter larger than the outside diameter of the bat's frame such that a gap exists between the two. The sleeve is secured to the bat's frame by both structural elements and adhesives at both ends of the sleeve. The walls in multiwall bats that contain gaps between the walls are able to absorb more energy from an impact with a ball as they are able to flex with greater independence from each other. The increase in flexing in turn improve the bat's rebound effect and performance.
However all of the designs presented here are, in essence, single wall designs as the separate walls are securely connected or make contact, either continuously or at two or more points, with each other. As a result energy absorbed by the bat is transmitted to each wall at multiple points, not just the point of impact. Additionally the walls, since they are connected to each other, freely allow energy absorbed as vibrations to travel along the full length of the bat's frame and every structural element attached to the bat's frame.
On impact with a ball a bat absorbs energy by two means; flexing and vibrating. Energy that flexes the wall leads to improved rebound effect. In the multiwall designs presented here the walls will flex at each point they are in contact with each other. Using the Eggiman patent as an example the inner wall will flex at the two points where it is secured to the outer wall and where the ball impacts with the outer wall. Although most of the energy that flexes the inner wall will be at the point of impact some flexing energy will “bleed away” at the other two points where the inner wall is secured to the outer wall and correspondingly reduce the amount of flexing at the point of impact. When a ball impacts a bat the bat will vibrate. Although the bat will always vibrate the amount of vibrations may sometimes be felt by the batter and can lead to the batter experiencing a “stinging” sensation in their hands. Energy absorbed as vibrations adversely affects the rebound effect in two ways. First it can be easily seen that vibration energy directly subtracts from flexing energy in that the more energy absorbed by vibration the less energy is available to be absorbed for flexing. Vibrations also adversely impact the rebound effect by actively working against the wall flexing. Vibrations are an oscillatory effect creating an equal amount of movement away from a resting point. As the wall is flexed energy will have to be expended to overcome the vibrations resulting in a reduction of the energy used to flex the wall and therefore a less than optimal rebound effect.
The prior art designs presented herein provide for a less than optimal rebound effect by means of the multiple points of contact between the walls and the multiple points of contact allow vibrations to spread throughout the bat.
A hollow non-wood baseball or softball bat wherein the impact portion of the bat contains an inner multi-walled barrel that is positioned by means of a (i) foam insert, (ii) tube extending from the bat's knob, or (iii) line attached to the bat's knob and end cap and extending throughout the bat such that the inner barrel does not come into contact with the inside wall of the bat when the bat is at rest yet when swung the inner barrel is allowed to move so as to amplify the rebound effect given to the ball upon impact with the bat.
The system provides an improved baseball bat that includes a multi-walled inner barrel to enhance the rebound power of the bat wall. U.S. Pat. No. 9,005,056 and assigned to the assignee of the present application describes a bat having an inner barrel that does not come into contact with the inside wall of the bat when the bat is at rest. The present system provides a multi-layer floating insert.
In one embodiment, at least a portion of the outer surface of the insert touches the inner surface of the barrel of the bat and is in continuous contact with the inner surface of the barrel of the bat during operation.
In the embodiment of
There is a gap GI between outer wall 301 and inner wall 302. The thickness of GI varies from the narrow end of the insert 300 to the widest point of the insert 300.
In one embodiment, inner wall 302 is itself comprised of two walls 308 and 310 with a gap 305 therebetween. A series of spacers formed in gap 305 help maintain the distance between the walls 308 and 310
The center region of insert 300 is a hollow shaft 311 that is air filled in one embodiment. The insert may be comprised of any suitable rigid material, including metal, carbon fiber, titanium, poly or plastic, and the like.
In operation, the bat insert is used with a tubular bat having a large diameter barrel portion that tapers to a narrow handle having a knob on the end thereof. The top of the tubular bat has a cap to cover the cavity of the bat. When the bat is at rest, the bat insert does not make any contact with the inner wall of the bat. When the bat is swung the insert is deterred or prevented from moving axially within the hitting portion by one of a plurality of embodiments described below. Since the multi-layer insert is not fastened or attached to the bat frame in any manner, when the ball makes contact with the bat, the insert is able to absorb a greater amount of the energy than inserts of prior art bats that are physically attached to the bat frame. The greater energy absorbed in turn causes a larger rebound effect. The sum total of the rebound effect of the wall of the hitting portion of the bat and the insert is greater than prior art bats resulting in a higher performance bat. The insert will also dampen vibrations by not being connected to the frame of the bat and by compressing against the wall on the side opposite of the impact.
When a bat contacts a ball, the wall of the bat is deformed and the insert moves against the inner wall of the bat opposite where the ball is struck. Both walls of the bat insert compress and then rebound in the direction of the struck ball, providing additional force to the ball as it leaves the bat.
The bat insert 20 of
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
In one embodiment, the shape of the insert may be effectively cylindrical as shown in
In one embodiment, the section of foam 28 near the end cap may be cut so that a section of foam near the end cap 26 is separate from the remainder of the foam near the insert 20.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5415398 | Eggiman | May 1995 | A |
5511777 | McNeely | Apr 1996 | A |
6663517 | Buiatti | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7867114 | Sutherland | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7985149 | Watari | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8602924 | Shindome | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8632428 | Burger | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9005056 | Pegnatori | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9138625 | Chung | Sep 2015 | B2 |
10583340 | Lanyon | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11097171 | Pegnatori | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20020091022 | Fritzke | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094892 | Chauvin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030004020 | Ogawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050221924 | Sutherland | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080070726 | Watari | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090280935 | Watari | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110105255 | Watari | May 2011 | A1 |
20140080642 | Epling | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20200330838 | Goodwin | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210379454 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16733232 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17410862 | US |