Baseband-derived RF digital predistortion

Abstract
A baseband-derived RF predistortion system using a lookup table having coefficients extracted at baseband and then applied at RF by means of a vector modulator. The architecture combines the narrowband advantage of envelope predistortion with the accuracy of baseband predistortion, and including compensation for memory effects. A polynomial-based alternative is also described.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to power amplifiers for wireless communications systems, and more particularly relates to predistortion methods for linearizing the output of such power amplifiers.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Reliable mobile, or wireless, communication systems rely on clean and consistent transmission from base-stations under widely and rapidly changing conditions. Therefore, the radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers (PA) found in the base stations of such wireless communication systems have typically been the most critical and costly component. This is derived from the stringent requirements on spectrum and power efficiency of these transmitters, even though they are driven by wideband and highly varying signals. To meet the demanding specifications for these amplifiers, a number of linearization techniques have been implemented. One such linearization technique, called digital baseband predistortion, has been successfully implemented using digital signal processors. However, digital baseband predistortion has a disadvantage in that it requires the entire transmit path to be several times wider than the signal bandwidth due to the predistorted input. Therefore, this wideband transmit path demands a fast digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and wideband filters. Moreover, as the bandwidth of the input signal gets wider, the bandwidth requirement of the baseband predistortion system gets much wider. In contrast, the main advantage of RF envelope digital predistortion is that the transmit path doesn't need to be wideband. But RF envelope digital predistortion has the disadvantage that it requires additional components, such as an envelope detector and large RF delay lines, that create inaccuracy and loss, as well as increased cost and complexity. There has therefore been a need for a predistortion system that provides the desired precision without unnecessary cost and complexity.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises a new architecture for a predistortion system that substantially removes the wideband requirements and potential distortions caused by the additional components typically required in the prior art. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed architecture achieves a reduction of adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR) comparable to conventional baseband predistortion. The proposed architecture is suitable for the applications which require wide bandwidth (i.e., >100 MHz).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates in block diagram form an embodiment of the predistortion system of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates in block diagram form a test bench for establishing and verifying the operation of the system of the present invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates in graphical form the measured spectra for the delay dependence of the system wherein:


(a) represents the output of a power amplifier without predistortion;


(b) represents the output of a power amplifier with one sample advanced;


(c) represents the output of a power amplifier with one sample delayed;


(d) represents the output of a power amplifier with coarse delay match.



FIG. 4 illustrates an alternative embodiment to the lookup table shown in FIG. 1, using a polynomial calculation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

A block diagram of an embodiment of the proposed system is shown in FIG. 1. A predistortion function, F, is derived at baseband as shown in the block 100 labeled Digital Baseband Processing, but applied to the output at RF. A vector modulator 105, also indicated as VM, is employed to generate the predistorted signal based on the predistortion function. A magnitude calculation block 110 indexes an input signal in order to determine the proper correction coefficients at each instant either from a lookup table or a polynomial calculation. A digital delay component is able to compensate for the delay difference, τd, between the predistorting path and the main transmit path, including memory effects. This delay mismatch between two paths should be compensated using delay calibration.


More particularly, an input signal is converted into I and Q components 120 and 125 in a conventional manner (and therefore not shown). The I and Q components are provided to a digital delay 130, and also provided to the magnitude calculation block 110 as well as an adaptation algorithm block 135.


In an embodiment as shown in FIG. 1, the magnitude calculation block and the adaptation algorithm block both provide inputs to a look-up table 140, which has stored therein a database of correction coefficients appropriate to the range of operation of the system. As noted above, the LUT 140 supplies the correction factor appropriate to each value of the input to a pair of DAC's 145A-B. The outputs of the DAC's 145A-B are filtered in a pair of low pass filters 150A-B, the outputs of which are provided to the vector modulator 105.


In at least some embodiments, the LUT values are initially obtained via a calibration routine, whereby the output signal from the power amplifier is measured and the LUT coefficients are estimated so as to compensate for any nonlinear distortion created by the power amplifier. In such an embodiment, the LUT coefficients can be stored in the memory of either an FPGA or a DSP, and can be populated with a microprocessor or digital signal processor. In addition, the LUT coefficients can be updated by, as just one example, feeding the output of the power amplifier back to the baseband signal processor, where it is compared with the input signal, in response to which the lookup table value is updated. The feedback block shown in FIG. 1 can also be implemented by, for example, down-converting the output of the power amplifier to baseband. The baseband signal can then be compared with the input signal and the resulting error will be used to update the LUT coefficients. As just one alternative, the output signal from the power amplifier can be spectrally monitored, and the feedback signal will monitor the out-of-band distortion using a downconverter, bandpass filter and power detector. The output of the power detector can then be used to adjust the LUT values or, if a polynomial approach is used, to adjust the polynomial coefficients.


Referring to FIG. 4, an implementation of the invention using a polynomial approach can be better appreciated. Instead of using a lookup table as in FIG. 1, the output of the magnitude calculation block 110 is provided to a series of polynomials F11, F1R, F21, F2R, FN1, FNR (each calculated in either the DSP or FPGA performing other processing), and then summed as shown. The result of the summation is then provided to the DAC's 145A-B, just as with the output of the lookup table in FIG. 1. The remainder of the design is the same, and is therefore not repeated in FIG. 4. The polynomials can be expressed as

F1{z}=α1112Z+α13Z2+ . . . +α1NZN-1
and
F2{z}=α1112Z+α13Z2+ . . . +α1NZN-1


As noted above, the polynomial coefficients are updated in the same manner as the updates to the lookup table described in connection with FIG. 1. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention, whether implemented using a polynomial approach, or the lookup table approach of FIG. 1, is able to compensate for memory effects in the power amplifier, thus providing substantially improved linearization over the prior art.


Referring still to FIG. 1, the output of the digital delay 130 is supplied to a quadrature modulator 155, the output of which is supplied to a DAC 160. The output of the DAC 160, which takes the form shown in the graph 160A, is provided to a low pass filter 165, where it is modulated in mixer 170 with the signal flo as indicated at 175, and then passed through bandpass filter 180. The result is provided to the vector modulator 105, which also receives the correction signals, including delay compensation, from the LPF's 150A-B. The vector modulator output forms the envelope indicated in the graph 105A, and is provided to the power amplifier 185, the output of which is represented by the graph 185A. The output is also sampled at 190, and the sample is fed back along feedback path 195 as another input to the adaptation algorithm logic 135, to permit the output signal to be monitored to ensure, among other things, that the values in the look-up table are updated if appropriate.


In some embodiments, the DAC 160 will preferably have at least twice bandwidth of the signal to be converted.


Delay mismatch: To see delay mismatch effects with respect to performance of the system, suppose the RF input, x(t), consists of two tones with a tone spacing (ω21). The predistortion function, F, with delay mismatch, τd, can be described as

F(t−τd)=a1+a3|Xe(t−τd)|2=a1a3a3 cos [(ω2−ω1)t+ω1τd]  (1)


where Xe(t) is the envelope of the input signal, a's are the complex coefficients of the polynomials, and τd is the delay mismatch. It can be seen from (1) that the predistortion function requires the same bandwidth of the frequency spacing in order to compensate up to third order intermodulation distortions (IMD). The predistorted input RF signal, XPD(t), then can be expressed as

XPD(t)=x(t)F(t−τd)  (2)


After substituting (1) into (2), expanding, and arranging it, it can be simply formulated as

XPD(t)=b1S+b3SUIMD<−(ω2−ω1d+b3SLIMD<(ω2−ω1d  (3)


where b's are complex coefficients and S, SUIMD, and SLIMD denotes two tone RF input signals, third order upper IMD, and lower IMD components, respectively, and <represents the angle in relation to the next term. From (3), depending on τd, the phase of the upper IMD components is decreased by (ω2−ω1) τd and the phase of the lower IMD parts increases by the same amount.


Experimental Results: A single carrier wideband code division multiplexing access (WCDMA) signal with 10 dB peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is used in the test bench shown in FIG. 2 for the proposed structure of the predistortion system. The test bench consists of two electronic signal generators (Agilent E4433B and E4438C), a vector modulator (Analog Devices AD8341), a Doherty power amplifier with 300 WATTS peak envelope power (PEP) and 61 dB gain, a vector signal analyzer (Agilent VSA89641A), and a personal computer with MATLAB and advanced design system (ADS). The baseband in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) outputs on the rear panel of E4438C are connected into AD8341. The first source (E4433B) is considered as a master and its 10 MHz reference output is used by the slave source (E4438C) as a clock reference (10 MHz input). The RF input signal x(t) and the baseband derived signal or function F are synchronized based on the following procedures. A marker is placed at the beginning of the input signal file x(t) in the master source, so that a pulse is sent on the EVENT1 output every time that this marker is met. The EVENT1 output is connected to the pattern trigger input of the slave. In order to estimate delay difference, coarse delay calibration was performed based on delay measurements between the main path for the RF input signal and the baseband path for the predistortion function. The predistortion algorithm applied here is based on memoryless fifth order polynomial using indirect learning.



FIG. 3 shows the measurements results for the digital predistortion system of the present invention. The system reduces the distortions around 15 dB as seen from curves (a) and (d) in FIG. 3, and the performances with respect to delay dependence are represented in (b) and (c). With one sample (26 nsec) advanced and one sample delayed intentionally to investigate effects on delay, the system performances are degraded by around 4 dB to 10 dB. This verifies that delay mismatch is detrimental to the proposed system performance like RF envelope digital predistortion. However, using the system of the present invention, the delay can be substantially perfectly matched using digital delay, unlike RF envelope digital predistortion which utilizes analog RF delay lines.


Having fully described an embodiment of the invention and various alternatives, those skilled in the art will recognize, given the teachings herein, that numerous alternatives and equivalents exist which do not depart from the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention not be limited by the foregoing description, but only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A wideband predistortion system for use with radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers, the system comprising: a baseband input operable to receive a baseband signal;an RF output operable to provide a signal to an RF power amplifier;a plurality of polynomial blocks operable to determine a plurality of polynomial coefficients using the baseband signal;a vector modulator coupled to the RF output and operable to apply the plurality of polynomial coefficients to the RF output; andan adaptation algorithm unit operable to optimize predistortion components using the plurality of polynomial coefficients.
  • 2. The wideband predistortion system of claim 1, wherein the vector modulator comprises a plurality of delayed and summed vector modulators.
  • 3. The wideband predistortion system of claim 1, wherein the vector modulator comprises a variable attenuator and a variable phase shifter.
  • 4. The wideband predistortion system of claim 1, further comprising a digital delay block coupled to the adaptation algorithm unit.
  • 5. The wideband predistortion system of claim 4, wherein the digital delay block comprises an equalizer.
  • 6. A wideband predistortion system for use with radio frequency (RF) power amplifiers, the system comprising: a baseband input operable to receive a baseband signal;a quadrature modulator coupled to the baseband input and operable to receive the baseband signal and translate the baseband signal to an RF frequency;an RF output operable to provide a signal to an RF power amplifier;a plurality of polynomial blocks operable to determine a plurality of polynomial coefficients using the baseband signal; anda vector modulator coupled to the RF output and operable to apply the plurality of polynomial coefficients to the RF output.
  • 7. The wideband predistortion system of claim 6, wherein the vector modulator comprises a plurality of delayed and summed vector modulators.
  • 8. The wideband predistortion system of claim 6, wherein the vector modulator comprises a variable attenuator and a variable phase shifter.
  • 9. The wideband predistortion system of claim 6, further comprising a digital delay block coupled to the adaptation algorithm unit.
  • 10. The wideband predistortion system of claim 9, wherein the digital delay block comprises an equalizer.
  • 11. A method for compensating for memory effects in a wideband predistortion system, the method comprising: receiving a baseband signal at a baseband input;determining a plurality of polynomial coefficients at a plurality of polynomial blocks, using the baseband signal;applying the plurality of polynomial coefficients to an RF output, using a vector modulator coupled to the RF output;providing the RF output to an RF power amplifier; andoptimizing predistortion components at an adaptation algorithm unit coupled to the RF power amplifier, using the plurality of polynomial coefficients.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the vector modulator comprises a plurality of delayed and summed vector modulators.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the vector modulator comprises a variable attenuator and a variable phase shifter.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/481,389, filed on May 25, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/330,451, filed on Dec. 8, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/012,416, filed on Dec. 7, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (128)
Number Name Date Kind
4638248 Schweickert Jan 1987 A
4700151 Nagata Oct 1987 A
4890300 Andrews Dec 1989 A
4929906 Voyce et al. May 1990 A
5049832 Cavers Sep 1991 A
5121412 Borth Jun 1992 A
5132639 Blauvelt et al. Jul 1992 A
5396190 Murata Mar 1995 A
5486789 Palandech et al. Jan 1996 A
5579342 Crozier Nov 1996 A
5675287 Baker et al. Oct 1997 A
5678198 Lemson Oct 1997 A
5732333 Cox et al. Mar 1998 A
5757229 Mitzlaff May 1998 A
5786728 Alinikula Jul 1998 A
5920808 Jones et al. Jul 1999 A
5936464 Grondahl Aug 1999 A
5937011 Carney et al. Aug 1999 A
5949283 Proctor et al. Sep 1999 A
5959499 Khan et al. Sep 1999 A
5963549 Perkins et al. Oct 1999 A
6054896 Wright et al. Apr 2000 A
6055418 Harris et al. Apr 2000 A
6091941 Moriyama et al. Jul 2000 A
6141390 Cova Oct 2000 A
6166601 Shalom et al. Dec 2000 A
6240144 Ha May 2001 B1
6242979 Li Jun 2001 B1
6246286 Persson Jun 2001 B1
6246865 Lee Jun 2001 B1
6275685 Wessel et al. Aug 2001 B1
6301579 Becker Oct 2001 B1
6315189 Williams Nov 2001 B1
6400774 Matsuoka et al. Jun 2002 B1
6424225 Choi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430402 Agahi-Kesheh Aug 2002 B1
6512417 Booth et al. Jan 2003 B2
6552609 Hamada et al. Apr 2003 B2
6552634 Raab Apr 2003 B1
6566944 Pehlke et al. May 2003 B1
6625429 Yamashita Sep 2003 B1
6639050 Kieliszewski Oct 2003 B1
6639463 Ghanadan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6639466 Johnson Oct 2003 B2
6677870 Im et al. Jan 2004 B2
6697436 Wright et al. Feb 2004 B1
6703897 O'Falherty et al. Mar 2004 B2
6741663 Tapio et al. May 2004 B1
6747649 Sanz-Pastor et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751447 Jin et al. Jun 2004 B1
6794931 Kenington Sep 2004 B2
6963242 White et al. Nov 2005 B2
6983025 Schell Jan 2006 B2
6985704 Yang et al. Jan 2006 B2
7031749 Mitama Apr 2006 B1
7035345 Jeckeln et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042287 Robinson May 2006 B2
7061314 Kwon et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064606 Louis Jun 2006 B2
7079818 Khorram Jul 2006 B2
7102442 Anderson Sep 2006 B2
7103329 Thon Sep 2006 B1
7104310 Hunter Sep 2006 B2
7106806 Kenington Sep 2006 B1
7109792 Leffei Sep 2006 B2
7109998 Smith Sep 2006 B2
7151913 Ahmed Dec 2006 B2
7158765 Blair et al. Jan 2007 B2
7193471 Tsutsui et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193472 Gotou et al. Mar 2007 B2
7248642 Vella-Coleiro Jul 2007 B1
7259630 Bachman et al. Aug 2007 B2
7301402 Norris et al. Nov 2007 B2
7321635 Osenasek et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321636 Harel et al. Jan 2008 B2
7372918 Muller et al. May 2008 B2
7409007 Johnson et al. Aug 2008 B1
7469491 McCallister et al. Dec 2008 B2
7493094 Ichitsubo et al. Feb 2009 B2
7593710 Brigaud et al. Sep 2009 B2
7702300 McCune Apr 2010 B1
7826810 Carmel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7831221 Leffel et al. Nov 2010 B2
RE42287 Apodaca et al. Apr 2011 E
8149950 Kim et al. Apr 2012 B2
8213884 Kim et al. Jul 2012 B2
8401499 Kim et al. Mar 2013 B2
20020034260 Kim Mar 2002 A1
20020044014 Wright et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020080891 Ahn et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020097085 Stapleton Jul 2002 A1
20020101937 Antonio et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020101938 Horagushi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020158689 Harris et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020186783 Opas et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020187761 Im et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193085 Mathe et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030095608 Duperray May 2003 A1
20030179829 Pinckley et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030179830 Eidson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030207680 Yang et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030234688 Matsuyoshi et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040017859 Sills et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040032912 Ocenasek et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040212428 Ode et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040240585 Bishop et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050059360 Kenington Mar 2005 A1
20050079834 Maniwa et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050159117 Bausov et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050262498 Ferguson et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060012426 Nezami Jan 2006 A1
20060012427 Nezami Jan 2006 A1
20060141957 Fischer et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060214729 Furuya et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060270366 Rozenblit et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070075780 Krvavac et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070171234 Crawfis et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070241812 Yang Oct 2007 A1
20070264947 Rozenblit et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080152037 Kim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080240286 Zhnag et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080265996 Kim et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090013317 Abfalter et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090088093 Nentwig Apr 2009 A1
20090213972 Maunuksela et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100271957 Stapleton et al. Oct 2010 A1
20120147993 Kim et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120230382 Kim et al. Sep 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
1462153 Dec 2003 CN
1518209 Apr 2004 CN
1531213 Sep 2004 CN
1640086 Jul 2005 CN
1288341 Jun 2006 CN
1838530 Sep 2006 CN
1983801 Jun 2007 CN
2012-525093 Oct 2012 CN
2000-278237 Oct 2000 JP
2002-536902 Oct 2002 JP
2003-304122 Oct 2003 JP
2005-033632 Feb 2005 JP
2005-150932 Jun 2005 JP
2005-333353 Dec 2005 JP
2006505160 Feb 2006 JP
2006-340166 Dec 2006 JP
2007-195056 Aug 2007 JP
WO 0046916 Aug 2000 WO
WO 2004040870 May 2004 WO
WO 2006087864 Aug 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
Office Action for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2010-536550 dated Aug. 7, 2012, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,451 mailed on May 6, 2011, 51 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,451 mailed on Oct. 19, 2011, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,451 mailed on Jan. 26, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/330,451 mailed on Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,389 mailed on Nov. 19, 2012, 5 pages.
English Translation and First Office Action for corresponding Chinese Application No. 200880126324.2 dated May 29, 2013, 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130214861 A1 Aug 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61012416 Dec 2007 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13481389 May 2012 US
Child 13776163 US
Parent 12330451 Dec 2008 US
Child 13481389 US