In a column-like vessel of length 60 cm and diameter 9 cm with jacket heating and attached condenser, about 2.5 kg of pieces of aluminum in the form of small bars having in each case a weight of about 11 g were initially introduced and pickled with dilute hydrochloric acid. A 1:1 mixture of hydrochloric acid and glycolic acid was then poured in. After charging the solution and heating to about 100° C., the aluminum metal was attacked with the evolution of hydrogen. The progress of the reaction was observed by determining the aluminum and chloride content of the solution. At an aluminum:chlorine atomic ratio of 3.3:1, the reaction was terminated by discharging the solution. The resulting aluminum complex was used for active ingredients described in Examples 3 and 6.
In a column-like vessel of length 60 cm and diameter 9 cm with jacket heating and attached condenser, about 2.5 kg of pieces of aluminum in the form of small bars having in each case a weight of about 11 g were initially introduced and pickled with dilute hydrochloric acid. A 1:1 mixture of hydrochloric acid and lactic acid was then poured in. After charging the solution and heating to about 100° C., the aluminum metal was attacked with the evolution of hydrogen. The progress of the reaction was observed by determining the aluminum and chloride content of the solution. At an aluminum:chlorine atomic ratio of 3.3:1, the reaction was terminated by discharging the solution. The resulting aluminum complex was used for active ingredients described in Examples 4, 5 and 7.
The aluminum complex prepared in Example 1 was mixed with hydrochloric acid, water and glycine in order to obtain the composition given in Table 1.
The aluminum complex prepared in Example 2 was mixed with hydrochloric acid and water in order to obtain the composition given in Table 2.
The aluminum complex prepared in Example 2 was mixed with hydrochloric acid, water and lactate in order to obtain the composition given in Table 3.
The three complexes described in the examples were analyzed with regard to their molecular weight distribution using GPC measurements. The separating column used was an RP1 system. The eluent used was HNO3/water, the change in the refractive index being detected.
The reference substance is standard commercial basic aluminum chloride and aluminum chloride hexahydrate.
Basic aluminum chloride shows four marked peaks at a maximum at:
The monomeric aluminum chloride hexahydrate shows only one peak at 8.1 min in the chromatogram. Polymeric aluminum species thus move within the exclusion volume of the separating column and are therefore eluted and detected first. To characterize the novel active ingredients, the areas of peaks 1-4 were then compared. The results are shown in Table 5:
The table clearly shows that with the novel active ingredient the fractions of Al polymer with high and moderate molecular weight are significantly reduced and at the same time the fractions of Al monomer and Al oligomer greatly increase. In parallel to this, the peak maxima show a shift to lower molecular weights.
The novel aluminum complex described in Example 1 was further processed together with zirconium salt to give an antiperspirant mixture.
Firstly, the basic zirconium carbonate was dissolved in hydrochloric acid, glycine was added and the resulting mixture was added, with stirring, to the novel antiperspirant Al complex from Example 1.
The resulting active ingredient combination was analyzed with regard to its molecular weight distribution using GPC. The separating column used was an RP1 system. The eluent used was HNO3/water, with the change in the refractive index being detected. The reference used was standard commercial zirconium aluminium glycine tetrachlorohydrate.
Table 8 shows that the novel active ingredient complex with the complex ligands according to the invention shows reduced fractions of high polymer, while Al oligomer and monomer species increase considerably.
The novel aluminum complex described in Example 2 was further processed together with zirconium salt to give an antiperspirant mixture.
Firstly, the basic zirconium carbonate was dissolved in hydrochloric acid, glycine was added and the resulting mixture was added, with stirring, to the novel antiperspirant Al complex from Example 1.
The resulting active ingredient combination was analyzed with regard to its molecular weight distribution using GPC. The separating column used was an RP1 system. The eluent used was HNO3/water, with the change in the refractive index being detected. The reference used was standard commercial zirconium aluminium glycine tetrachlorohydrate.
Table 10 shows that the novel active ingredient complex with the complex ligands according to the invention shows reduced fractions of high polymer, while Al oligomer and monomer species increase considerably.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 015 025.7 | Mar 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/03003 | 3/22/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/13/2007 |