Basic zinc phosphites

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention is concerned with novel basic zinc phosphite pigments and their method of preparation. These pigments are useful as tannin stain inhibitors in water and solvent based coating compositions for wood surfaces. The pigments also impart anticorrosive and mildew resistant properties to such coatings.
In the past, lead-based pigments such as basic lead silicate complexes and dibasic lead phosphite have been utilized in paints for inhibiting the tannin staining of wood surfaces such as cedar or redwood which are used extensively in roof and siding coverings for homes and other buildings. These pigments act to prevent the bleeding of tannin or other wood colorant from the wood surface through the coating film which would cause streaking and discoloration and thereby destroy the appearance and quality of the coating. Although the performance of these pigments are highly satisfactory, they suffer from the disadvantage that they are lead-based and therefore ecologically undesirable due to the inherent toxicity of the lead contained therein. As a result, industry is constantly seeking new substitutes for lead containing products which are non-toxic and at the same time exhibit the high performance characteristics of the lead products.
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of this invention to provide a substitute for lead-based tannin stain inhibitor pigments.
It is also an object of this invention to provide novel basic zinc phosphites having excellent efficiency as tannin stain inhibitors for wood surface coatings.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a novel process for preparing said basic zinc phosphites.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The basic zinc phosphites of this invention can be represented by the emperical formula;
X ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3
wherein X is a number from 1/2 to 10. The term "basic" is well known in the art for describing compounds of lead and is used herein in the same context for describing the basic zinc phosphites of this invention. The basicity of the zinc phosphites is related to the molecular ratio of ZnO to ZnHPO.sub.3 contained therein. Basicity increases with the ratio; products of high basicity containing higher amounts of ZnO with respect to ZnHPO.sub.3. In the above formula, a molecular ratio of ZnO to ZnHPO.sub.3 of from 1/2 to 10 shown which corresponds to a range of basic zinc phosphites from hemibasic to decabasic. The basic zinc phosphites can be substantially anhydrous; that is containing no bound water of hydration or can be associated with about 1 to 3 moles or more of water of hydration. The presence of water of hydration however, is not critical to the performance of the basic zinc phosphites as tannin stain inhibitors. All of the basic zinc phosphite compounds are white solids having slight solubilities in water. When these compositions were tested as tannin stain inhibitors in various latex paint formulations, performance was comparable to a basic lead sulfo-silicate complex.
The process for preparing the basic zinc phosphites of this invention comprises admixing zinc oxide and phosphorous acid in the presence of water to form a basic zinc phosphite wherein the ratio of the number of moles of phosphorous acid to the number of moles of zinc oxide is from 1:1.5 to 1:11.
The zinc oxide and phosphorous acid may be admixed in other ways to form the basic zinc phosphites. For example, the zinc oxide slurry may be slowly added to an aqueous phosphorous acid solution to achieve substantially the same result as above. It is also possible to slowly add dry zinc oxide to an aqueous phosphorous acid solution using strong agitation.
The crude product forms in the slurry as a white solid which can be recovered for example by filtering. The wet product is then dried to remove excess water. If anhydrous basic zinc phosphites are desired the dried product can be heated to remove all water of hydration. By applying this process for the preparation of the basic zinc phosphites excellent yields are obtained.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The basic zinc phosphites as prepared in this invention having basicities from 1 to 10 have utility as tannin stain inhibitors for water-based coating compositions such as latex paints. When compared to a basic lead sulfo-silicate complex, the basic zinc phosphites show similar tannin stain inhibitory properties. Normal zinc phosphite, ZnHPO.sub.3, and zinc oxide alone are essentially ineffective as tannin stain inhibitors. In addition, physical mixtures of zinc oxide and normal zinc phosphite wherein the molar ratio of zinc oxide to normal zinc phosphite is 3:1 which is, on a mole basis, comparable to the chemical compound, tribasic zinc phosphite, are also ineffective.
The preferred tannin stain inhibitors of this invention are those basic zinc phosphites having basicities of from tribasic to octabasic. A particularly preferred basic zinc phosphite is tribasic zinc phosphite.
In addition to effective inhibition of tannin staining, the basic zinc phosphites of this invention are useful in coating compositions as anti-corrosive pigments and as mildew preventive pigments. In flammable materials such as polyester plastics, the basic zinc phosphites impart flame retardancy. Another useful property of many of the basic zinc salts is their ability to absorb high energy ultra-violet radiation. This property makes them suitable for use as ultra-violet screening agents for such UV-sensitive materials as polyethylene, polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride-containing products.
In the method for preparing the instant basic zinc phosphite compositions, the amount of water used in forming the zinc oxide and water slurry is not critical. Generally it is preferred to use sufficient water to provide a weight ratio of water to zinc oxide of at least 3:1 to 8:1. If less than a 3:1 ratio is used the slurry tends to become thick and difficult to stir.
Sufficient agitation should be used in forming the slurry in order to achieve a homogeneous dispersion of the zinc oxide. This is preferably accomplished by slowly adding the zinc oxide to water while constantly stirring the slurry until it appears that all the zinc oxide is evenly dispersed. If the zinc oxide is not well dispersed and agglomerates or aggregates of zinc oxide are present, incomplete reaction will take place resulting in low yields and low purities of the basic zinc phosphites formed in the subsequent stages of the process. The zinc oxide slurry may be formed at room temperatures or at elevated temperatures.
The zinc oxide used must be substantially pure. Impure zinc oxides contaminated with other metallic oxides will result in reduced yields and reduced purities of the formed basic zinc phosphites. The zinc oxide preferred in this invention is a French process zinc oxide having a purity of approximately 98-99%.
An acid catalyst while not essential, is preferably employed in the process to insure high yields. The catalyst is added to the zinc oxide-water slurry prior to the addition of phosphorous acid.
Among the acid catalysts which may be used are the water soluble organic carboxylic acids containing at least one carboxylate group. The term, "water soluble" as used in this invention means water solubility in the zinc oxide-water slurry at the concentrations used for catalyzing the reaction between the zinc oxide and phosphorous acid. In addition, these water soluble organic carboxylic acids may contain other functional groups such as hydroxyl, amino or carbonyl. Among the catalysts useful in this invention are formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, maleic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, levulinic acid and the like. Inorganic acids such as nitric acid and sulfamic acid may also be used. Acetic acid is preferred however because it is inexpensive and readily available.
The amount of catalyst preferred is between 0.2% and 1% based on the weight of ZnO in the slurry. Amounts greater than 1% offer no useful function in improving yields and purities of the basic zinc phosphites.
The phosphorous acid admixed with the zinc oxide slurry can be any strength phosphorous acid, either anhydrous or in aqueous solution. It is preferred to use from 50% to 70% aqueous phosphorous acid since it is readily available and can be easily handled.
In order to prepare the basic zinc phosphites of this invention the number of moles of phosphorous acid must be from 1/1.5 to 1/11 the number of moles of zinc oxide. To determine the molar amount of phosphorous acid required to prepare any given basic zinc phosphite the following relationship may be used: ##EQU1## wherein [H.sub.3 PO.sub.3 ] is the number of moles of phosphorous acid; [ZnO] is the number of moles of zinc oxide; and X is the basicity of the basic zinc phosphite to be prepared. For example, if it is desired to prepare monobasic zinc phosphite (X = 1) using 1 mole of zinc oxide in the slurry, 1/2 mole of phosphorous acid (100%) would be required. If tetrabasic zinc phosphite (X = 4) is desired using 1 mole of zinc oxide, then 1/5 mole of phosphorous acid would be required.
The phosphorous acid should be added slowly to the zinc-oxide-water slurry under constant agitation to prevent agglomeration of the formed basic zinc phosphite with the zinc oxide. Preferably this is accomplished by dropwise acid addition over a period of 45 to 60 minutes.
After all phosphorous acid has been added, the slurry may be heated while stirring to accelerate reaction. Generally heating at 65.degree. to 85.degree.C. for from 1 to 5 hours is sufficient to convert all zinc oxide and phosphorous acid to basic zinc phosphite. The slurry may be maintained at room temperatures, however longer reaction times are required.
The basic zinc phosphites form as a white solid which can be recovered by filtering. The product is then dried in an oven at from 100.degree. to 120.degree.C. If anhydrous basic zinc phosphites are desired, heating is continued at higher temperatures.
It has been found that yields of basic zinc phosphite of from 96 to 98% are achieved using this process based on the amount of zinc oxide used.

In order to more fully describe the instant invention the following examples are given:
EXAMPLE 1
This example illustrates the preparation of tribasic zinc phosphite, (3ZnO . ZnHPO.sub.3 . 2H.sub.2 O).
Exactly 209.35 g of zinc oxide was stirred into 1500 ml of water at room temperature. To the uniform slurry was added 6.25 ml of 10% acetic acid. Then 76.28 g of 69% phosphorous acid was added dropwise over a period of 1 hour during which time the temperature rose 27.degree.C. The slurry temperature was then raised to 65.degree.C. and stirring was continued for 3 hours at between 65-70.degree.C. The pH of the mixture was 6.65. The reaction mixture was then vacuum filtered and the product was dried for 18 hours at 105.degree.C. The actual yield of product was 269.78 g. Theoretical yield was 273.18 g. Analysis of the product showed: % Zn (observed), 61.90% Zn (theoretical), 61.46%; % P (observed), 7.24%, % P (theoretical) 7.28%, moles Zn/P (theoretical, 4.00; moles Zn/P (observed) 4.05.
EXAMPLES 2-10
In these examples basic zinc phosphites were prepared using the procedure of Example 1 having basicities ranging from 1 to 2 and 4 to 10. Table 1 below lists the amounts of zinc oxide, water, 10% acetic acid and phosphorous acid used in the preparations.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ 10%Basic Acetic 69% 75.7% 100%Zinc ZnO Water Acid H.sub.3 PO.sub.3 H.sub.3 PO.sub.3 H.sub.3 PO.sub.3 % Zn % Zn % P % PPhosphite Formula (g) (ml) (ml) (g) (g) (g) (Theor) (Obs) (Theor) (Obs)__________________________________________________________________________Monobasic ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.1H.sub.2 O 167.50 750 5.0 111.24 53.42 52.70 12.66 12.80Dibasic 2 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 315.57 1000 9.5 106.5 56.99 56.90 8.90 9.01Tetrabasic 4 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 346.34 2530 10.4 100.96 64.49 63.80 6.11 5.95Pentabasic 5 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 177.19 1000 5.3 39.23 66.68 66.15 5.27 5.67Hexabasic 6 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 180.17 1000 5.4 34.19 67.43 67.70 4.57 4.63Heptabasic 7 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub. 2 O 182.47 1000 5.5 30.30 68.81 68.67 4.08 3.83Octabasic 8 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 184.48 1000 5.5 27.21 69.93 70.00 3.68 3.73Nonabasic 9 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 185.80 800 5.6 24.68 71.54 71.68 3.39 3.06Decabasic 10 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O 187.04 800 5.6 22.59 72.26 72.08 3.11 2.73__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 11
This example illustrates the performance of the basic zinc phosphites of this invention for inhibiting tannin staining of cedar surfaces coated with a latex paint containing the basic zinc phosphites.
In the procedure, a series of acrylic latex paints were formulated containing the basic zinc phosphites prepared in Examples 1 through 10. As controls, a basic lead sulfo-silicate complex and a normal zinc phosphite were also formulated in the latex formulations which had the following composition:
PARTS BYINGREDIENTS WEIGHT______________________________________Water 260.00Thickener (Bentone LT-NL Industries, Inc. 4.00Potassium Tripolyphosphate 2.00Dispersant (Tamol 850-Rohm & Haas Co.) 13.00Wetting Agent (Triton X-100 Rohm & Haas Co.) 6.00Antifoam Agent (Colloids 677-Colloids, Inc.) 2.00Phenyl Mercuric Borate 0.40Titanium Dioxide Pigment 190.00Acrylic Emulsion (46% resin solids) 450.00Coalescent Agent 6.00Ethylene Glycol 40.00Ammonium Hydroxide 1.70Tannin Stain Inhibitor or Controls 150.00______________________________________
A cedar panel was coated with the above acrylic latexes to form side by side vertically painted strips approximately 31/2inches wide. The spreading rate was 450 square feet per gallon. An identical latex formulation which contained no tannin stain inhibitor was also applied to the panel as a control. After the latex coatings dried (about 2 hours) a top coat of a commercial acrylic latex-based paint was applied to the dried latex film.
After drying overnight the cedar panel was placed in a Cleveland High Humidity Cabinet for 72 hours. The panels were then visually observed for overall tannin staining of the top coated surfaces. The difference in color of the top coat indicated whether or not cedar staining was effectively inhibited. The results are summarized in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________ Inhibition ofExample Tannin Stain Inhibitor Tannin Staining______________________________________Control Normal zinc phosphite Not effective1 Tribasic Zinc phosphite effective2 Monobasic zinc phosphite Slightly effective3 Dibasic zinc phosphite effective4 Tetrabasic zinc effective phosphite5 Pentabasic zinc effective phosphite6 Hexabasic zinc phosphite effective7 Heptabasic zinc effective phosphite8 Octabasic zinc phosphite effective9 Nonabasic zinc phosphite Moderately effective10 Decabasic zinc phosphite Moderately effectiveControl Basic lead sulfo- effective silicate complexControl None Not effective______________________________________
As the table shows the monobasic zinc phosphite begins to show effective tannin stain inhibition whereas normal zinc phosphite is not effective. The tribasic thru octabasic zinc phosphites are as effective as the basic lead sulfo-silicate complex. The nona and decabasic zinc phosphites are also effective but to a moderate degree as compared to the tribasic tru octabasic zinc phosphites.
EXAMPLE 12
In this example, an acrylic latex paint modified with an alkyd was formulated containing tribasic zinc phosphite as a tannin stain inhibitor. The same latex was formulated using a basic lead sulfo-silicate complex as a control tannin stain inhibitor. The latex formulations had the following general composition;
PARTS BYINGREDIENTS WEIGHT______________________________________Water 292.00Thickener (Bentone LT-NL Industries, Inc.) 2.00Dispersant (Tamol 850-Rohm & Haas Co.) 13.00Potassium Tripolyphosphate 2.00Anti-Foam Agent (Nopco NXZ-Nopco-Chem. 2.00 Co.)Ethylene Glycol 40.00Preservative (Super-Ad-It, Tenneco Chem- 1.80 icals Inc.)Titanium Dioxide Pigment 160.00Acrylic Emulsion (50% resin solids) 400.00Alkyd Modified With Metallic Driers 25.00Coalescent Agent (Tributyl Phosphate) 10.00Tannin Stain Inhibitor 140.00______________________________________
Using the procedure of Example 11 for coating cedar panels with the latex formulations the top coatings were examined for overall cedar stain inhibition both before and after 72 hours of high humidity testing. The results are summarized in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3______________________________________ INHIBITION OF TANIN STAININGTANNIN STAIN Before High After 72 hrs inINHIBITOR Humidity High Humidity______________________________________A. Tribasic zinc effective effective phosphiteB. Basic lead sulfo- effective effective silicate complex______________________________________
As the table shows, tribasic zinc phosphite exhibits comparable tannin stain inhibition compared to the basic lead sulfo-silicate complex in the latex used.
EXAMPLE 13
In this example a polyvinyl acetate copolymer latex paint was formulated containing tribasic zinc phosphite as a tannin stain inhibitor. The same type latex was also formulated containing a basic lead sulfo-silicate complex as a control tannin stain inhibitor. The latex formulations had the following general composition;
PARTS BYINGREDIENT WEIGHT______________________________________Water 275.00Dispersant (Tamol 850-Rohm & Haas Co.) 13.00Thickener (Bentone LT-NL Industries, 2.00 Inc.)Anti Foam Agent (Polyglycol P-1200, 2.50 Dow Chemical)Wetting Agent (Tergitol NPX, Union 6.00 Carbide)Butyl cellosolve acetate 12.00Ethylene Glycol 40.00Titanium Dioxide Pigment 140.00Phenyl mercuric borate 0.40Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Emulsion 450.00(51% resin solidsTannin Stain Inhibitor 140.00______________________________________
Using the procedure of Example 11 for coating cedar panels with the latex formulations the dried strips were examined for overall cedar stain inhibition both before and after 72 hours of high humidity testing.
The results are summarized in Table 4 below.
TABLE 4______________________________________ INHIBITION OF TANNIN STAINING BeforeTANNIN STAIN High After 72 hrs. inINHIBITOR Humidity High Humidity______________________________________ moderatelyC. Tribasic effective effective zinc phosphiteD. Basic lead sulfo- effective effective silicate complex______________________________________
The results show that tribasic zinc phosphite is comparable to the basic lead sulfo-silicate complex.
EXAMPLE 14
This example illustrates the preparation of tribasic zinc phosphite, 3 ZnO . ZnHPO.sub.3 .2H.sub.2 O by employing various acid catalysts in the zinc oxide slurry.
A series of experiments were conducted following the procedure of Example 1 except that in each experiment acetic acid was replaced with a different acid catalyst. Table 5 below summarizes the types and amounts of catalyst used in the experiments. All amounts of catalyst are expressed as a weight percent of the zinc oxide used in the slurry. Yields of tribasic zinc phosphite formed were substantially the same as in Example 1.
TABLE 5______________________________________ Amount ofExperiment Type of Catalyst Catalyst(wt.%)______________________________________E Formic acid 0.23F Lactic acid 0.45G Levulinic acid 0.58H Nitric acid 0.30I Propionic acid 0.37J Sulfamic acid 0.48______________________________________
EXAMPLE 15
This example illustrates the preparation of tribasic zinc phosphite wherein the zinc oxide slurry is added to a phosphorous acid solution.
Zinc oxide, 209.35g. was slurried with 765 ml of deionized water and 6.25 ml of 10% acetic acid. A phosphorous acid solution was made-up by adding 75.97 g. of 69.28% aqueous phosphorous acid to 600 ml of water. The zinc oxide slurry was then slowly added to the phosphorous acid solution with stirring over a period of 55 minutes. Stirring was continued for 5 hours at between 20.degree. and 88.degree.C. The final pH was 6.88. The solids were recovered by filtering and drying at 120.degree.C. Yield and analysis of the product was substantially the same as in Example 1.
EXAMPLE 16
This example illustrates the preparation of tribasic zinc phosphite wherein no catalyst is employed.
French process zinc oxide, 208.93g. and 1500 ml of water were mixed together at ambient temperature. To this was slowly added 76.28g. of 69% phosphorous acid over a period of 1 hour. The mixture was then heated to between 65.degree.-70.degree.C and stirring continued for about 1 hour. The final pH was 6.62. The solids were recovered by vacuum filtering, drying 20 hours at 105.degree.C and hammer-milling through a 0.02 inch perforated screen. The yield of dried product was 269.7g. Elemental analysis of the product showed:
% Zn; 61.90; %P, 7:26; moles Zn/P, 3.98.
EXAMPLE 17
This example illustrates the ineffectiveness of a physical blend of 3 moles of ZnO and 1 mole of ZnHPO.sub.3, corresponding to the compound tribasic zinc phosphite (3 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3) in inhibiting tannin staining of a wood surface.
In this procedure, four acrylic latex paint formulations were prepared each containing different tannin stain inhibitor candidates: the first containing a physical blend of 50.4 parts by weight of normal zinc phosphite and 84.5 parts by weight of zinc oxide (molar ratio of ZnO/ZnHPO.sub.3 was 3/1). The 135 contained 135 parts by weight of tribasic zinc phosphite as prepared in Example 1.
The latex formulations had the following composition:
PARTS BYINGREDIENTS WEIGHT______________________________________Water 230.0Thickener (Bentone LT-NL Industries, 5.0 Inc.)Potassium Tripolyphosphate 1.0Dispersant (DAXAD 30-Dewey & Almy Co.) 6.5Wetting Agent (Triton X-100-Rohm & 4.5 Haas)Phenyl mercuric borate 2.0Anti Foam Agent (Colloids 667- 2.0 Colloids Inc.)Titanium Dioxide Pigment 220.0Composite Extender Pigment 40.0Acrylic Emulsion (46% resin solids) 520.0Coalescent Agent 7.0Ethylene Glycol 30.0Ammonium hydroxide 2.0Tannin Stain Inhibitor Candidate 135.0______________________________________
The procedure for coating cedar panels as outlined in Example 11 was used to test the tannin stain inhibitory characteristics of the candidates. Table 6 below summarizes the results.
TABLE 6______________________________________ Inhibition ofTannin Stain Inhibitor Candatate Tannin Staining______________________________________K Physical Blend of 3ZnO/ZnHPO.sub.3 ineffectiveL ZnO ineffectiveM ZnHPO.sub.3 ineffectiveN 3 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.2H.sub.2 O effective______________________________________
As the table shows, the physical blend of zinc oxide and zinc phosphite, zinc oxide alone or zinc phosphite alone are ineffective tannin stain inhibitors while the tribasic zinc phosphite of this invention is completely effective.
EXAMPLE 18
This example illustrates the effective tannin stain inhibition of a non-hydrated tribasic zinc phosphite, 3 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3.
The tribasic zinc phosphite of Example 1 heated in an oven at about 300.degree.C for several hours to remove all water of hydration. Using the procedure of Example 11, the resulting dehydrated tribasic zinc phosphite was incorporated into the latex paint formulation and tested for tannin stain inhibition on a cedar panel. The effectiveness of tannin stain inhibition was substantially the same as the hydrated tribasic zinc phosphite of Example 1.
EXAMPLE 19
This example illustrates the preparation of hemibasic zinc phosphite (1/2 ZnO.ZnHPO.sub.3 .1 H.sub.2 O).
Exactly 131.48g. of zinc oxide were slurried in 500 ml of 67.degree.C water and 3.9 ml of 10% acetic acid. Then 82.94g of 106.3% phosphorous acid were diluted with 80 ml of water. The phosphorous acid solution was slowly added to the stirred 60.degree.-67.degree.C zinc oxide slurry in 75 minutes and stirring was continued for 45 minutes at 65.degree.-70.degree.C. The slurry was allowed to stand for several hours at ambient temperature (pH 6.89). The solids were recovered by vacuum filtering and drying at 105.degree.C. Total yield was 419g.
______________________________________Wet analysis Observed Calculated______________________________________%Zn 48.8 49.14%P 15.8 15.55moles Zn/P 1.50 1.50______________________________________
EXAMPLE 20
This example illustrates the corrosion inhibiting properties of tribasic zinc phosphite when applied to a wood surface containing iron nail heads flush to the surface.
The latex paint formulations of Examples 11, 12 and 13 containing tribasic zinc phosphite as prepared in Example 1 were coated on white pine beveled siding which contained six iron nails driven flush to the surface to the pine boards. As a control the same board was coated side by side with similar latexes which contained no tribasic zinc phosphite. The boards were exposed north and south on vertical test fences outdoors. The condition of the nail heads were observed after 5 days exposure and after 26 days exposure using corrosion ratings as are set forth in ASTM D610-68 i.e. 10=no rust; 1-100% rust. Table 7 below summarizes the results.
TABLE 7______________________________________ Corrosion Ratings Exposure Exposure South North 5 26 5 26Board Latex Formulaton days days days days______________________________________0 Example 11 9 9 9 9P Example 11 Control 4 4 7 4Q Example 13 10 10 10 9R Example 13 Control 5 4 5 3S Example 12 9 9 10 10T Example 12 Control 5 4 7 5______________________________________
As the results in the table show, corrosion inhibition is imparted to each latex coating containing tribasic zinc phosphite. The controls, on the other hand, show substantial nail head corrosion in almost all cases.
EXAMPLE 21
Three oleoresinous paints, oil-alkyd vehicle were formulated with equal volumes of hemi-basic zinc phosphite, monobasic zinc phosphite and dibasic zinc phosphite respectively. The control paints were made with dibasic lead phosphite, a well known anti-corrosive pigment, and a blank where the volume of anti-corrosive pigment was replaced with magnesium silicate. The paints were coated on sand blasted clean steel and rusted hot-rolled steel panels. Each paint was applied to the steel panels as single coats and double coats. The control paints were coated on identical steel panels. These panels were then exposed to a marine atmosphere at Ocean City, N.J. After 20 months exposure the panels were evaluated for corrosion inhibition using the corrosion ratings of ASTM D610-68; 10=rust; 1=100% rust. The results are noted in Table 8.
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________ One Coat Two CoatsTest Corrosion Inhibitor Clean Steel Rusted Steel Clean Steel Rusted Steel__________________________________________________________________________U Hemibasic Zinc Phosphite 8 9 9 9V Monobasic Zinc Phosphite 7 1.sup.(1) 9 6W Dibasic Zinc Phosphite 7 9 9 9X Control (Dibasic lead phosphite) 5 9 9 9Y Blank 1.sup.(2) 1.sup.(2) 7.sup.(3) 4.sup.(3)__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(1) After eleven months exposure .sup.(2) After three months exposure .sup.(3) After six months exposure
EXAMPLE 22
One coat of the same paints as in Example 21 were applied to No. 100 Bonderized steel panels exposed to salt fog for 300 hours according to ASTM B117-64 and evaluated according to ASTM D714-56; Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints.
Table 9 summarizes the results of the salt fog tests.
TABLE 9______________________________________ Rating afterCorrosion Inhibitor 300 hours______________________________________Test U.sup.1 -Hemibasic Zinc Phosphite 8MTest V.sup.1 -Monobasic Zinc Phosphite 8MTest W.sup.1 -Dibasic Zinc Phosphite 8MTest X.sup.1 -Control(Dibasic lead phosphite) 8FTest Y.sup.1 -Blank F(100 hours)______________________________________ 8M = medium amount of very small blisters 8F = few very small blisters F = failed -- large blisters
The formulation for the test paints of Examples 21 and 22 was as follows:
INGREDIENT GALLONS______________________________________Corrosion Inhibitor 1.34Titanium Dioxide 5.29Magnesium Silicate 18.44Thickening and Suspending Agent 0.27(Bentone 38-NL Industries, Inc.)Raw Linseed Oil 20.26Alkyd Resin Solution 28.03(TT-R-266D Type I class B)Mineral Spirits -- medium 25.25Anti-skinning Agent 0.13Driers 0.80Total 99.81______________________________________
EXAMPLE 23
This example illustrates the mildew resistant properties of a latex paint containing tribasic zinc phosphite.
The latex paint of Example 11 containing the tribasic zinc phosphite as was prepared according to Example 1, was coated on cedar beveled siding and the siding exposed 90.degree. south at Hightstown, N.J. As a control a similar latex was coated on the siding containing no tribasic zinc phosphite.
At the end of 2, 4, and 6 months, the coated siding surface was examined for the presence of mildew growth. Mildew resistance was rated numerically from 1 to 10; a rating of 10 indicated no mildew growth and a rating of 0 indicated substantial mildew growth.
The results are summarized in Table 10.
TABLE 10______________________________________ Mildew Resistance 90.degree. North 90.degree. South 2 4 6 2 4 6Sample mos. mos. mos. mos. mos. mos.______________________________________Tribasiczinc phosphite 10 10 10 10 10 10Control 10 10 9 10 8 7______________________________________
As the results indicate tribasic zinc phosphite imparted long term mildew resistance to the coating.
EXAMPLE 24
This example illustrates the flame-retardant properties of tribasic zinc phosphite in a flammable plastic composition.
A flammable polyester composition was prepared by combining the following ingredients:
INGREDIENT Weight______________________________________Polyester of a polybasic alcohol with saturated 50.0 gand unsaturated polybasic acidsHalogenated polyester 50.0 gCobalt napthenate 0.2 gPeroxide of methyl ethyl ketone 1.7 gTribasic zinc phosphite 8.0 g______________________________________
A sample of the composition was held vertically in a cylinder. Mixtures of oxygen and nitrogen gasses were allowed to rise and pass over the sample. The lowest percentage of oxygen at which the sample burned for 3 minutes after ignition was recorded as the oxygen index. As a control, a flammable polyester composition was prepared containing no tribasic zinc phosphite and tested.
The oxygen index of the tribasic zinc phosphite-containing polyester composition was 24.6. The same polyester containing no tribasic zinc phosphite had an oxygen index of 21.6. These results show that tribasic zinc phosphite imparts flame retardancy to flammable materials.

Basic zinc phosphites

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)

Divisions (1)