The present invention relates generally to connectors and/or interconnects, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to high power connectors which may operate at frequencies up to approximately 100 to 300 GHz or higher, as well as batch fabrication methods thereof to optionally provide an array of such connectors.
Current millimeter wave capable connectors are typically very expensive due to the precision required in their construction. While a high price may be acceptable for low volume test and measurement application, systems that operate into such frequencies can require hundreds to many thousands of these connectors and their costs can become a problem. By way of example, creating phased arrays and/or other electronic warfare (EW) systems that can span into the upper EHF range may require practical, cost-effective interconnect solutions. High effective radiated power (ERP) EW, radar, or communications Ka band phased arrays may address the problem of pitch mismatch between the power electronics and the antenna array pitch using connector and cable dilations to increase the pitch to one acceptable for the power electronics. While expensive demonstrators may be shown without breakable interconnect, both high yield manufacturing, re-use, and practical deployment over a service lifetime may be expected to require modularity provided by make/break interconnect. As such, it may be desirable to build systems from standardized modules or sub-assemblies and allow for modular construction and/or field service, such as the separation of antenna sections from dilation layers from power T or T/R (transmit or transmit/receive) modules. Increasing the modularity in a high end microwave system can be an important step in allowing such systems to reduce in cost and thereby increase the quantity used. To this end, some systems may contain hundreds to thousands of blind-mate floating connectors, for example, to accomplish just a change in pitch between antennas and electronics (dilations). Volume cost of a 100-GHz-capable subminiature push-on connector series (SMPS) connector (G3PO-like) is currently greater than $35 for a bullet and two male shrouds. Add a phased controlled cable, and there may be well over $200 per element often spent for the assembly for each coaxial channel. This can amount to more than ˜$100,000 per 20×20 array in the dilation and its interconnect.
The problem may become worse at higher frequencies where connector costs may increase and/or can no longer fit on a half-wavelength element-to-element pitch. Interconnection at an element pitch at W band would require ˜1.5 mm OD on the connector—about 5× smaller in linear dimension than SMPS/G3PO connectors. Making the connections permanent is an approach to address this problem. However, this precludes ease of service and/or may make production yield substantially unobtainable. Another problem in interconnect for EW, radar, or communications may be power handling. A G3PO may be rated at ˜18W at 50 GHz. Voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) and/or voltage breakdown may not account for this limit. In addition, floating connector systems may utilize Be:Cu for the core metal and polymer for the dielectric. At increasing frequency, skin effect loss mechanisms may produce heating of the center pin metals which may have poor thermal transfer. Due to misalignment loading, a Teflon® dielectric (PTFE) may be prone to creep at increasing temperatures.
Thus, a need exists to address interconnect and/or connectors themselves spanning DC to 110 GHz or greater as a development problem to be addressed in terms of cost, size, and the like. Related machining, e.g., turning, operations may be incapable of providing cost effective precision with micron level accuracy for mm-scale devices.
In one of its aspects, the present invention relates to connectors and/or interconnect, having a relatively smaller size and lower cost (e.g., 10-fold lower) than existing devices. In addition, the present invention relates to microfabrication processes, or three-dimensional precision manufacturing process, for example ones used to create suspended recta-coax lines, MMIC sockets, and/or millimeter-wave (MMW) interconnection circuits with relatively low loss, small size/high density, and/or durability. The exemplary processes may facilitate batch manufacturing approaches which may achieve desired tolerances without the need for precision machining operations to obtain such tolerances. As such, the exemplary processes may employ lithography and/or multilayer electroforming to produce a plurality (e.g., thousands) of connectors at a time. As a result of such processes, exemplary devices of the present invention may operate at 500 μm and lower device dimensions, and may achieve tolerances on the submicron scale useful, for example, in microfabrication.
For example, the present invention may provide a multilayer microconnector structure formed by a multilayer additive build process, which includes a base layer having first and second opposing surfaces and having a plurality of vias extending therebetween. A conductive material may be disposed within the vias and may be configured to provide electrical communication between the first and second surfaces. A first layer of conductor material may be disposed over the base layer at the first surface, with the conductive layer comprising a plurality of electrically isolated upper conductive connector portions. Each upper connector portion may be disposed in electrical communication with the conductive material of a respective via. A second layer of conductor material may be disposed over the base layer at the second surface, with the second conductive layer comprising a plurality of electrically isolated conductive lower connector portions. Each lower connector portion may be disposed in electrical communication with the conductive material of a respective via, so that the upper and lower conductor portions are structured to provide a microconnector.
In addition, the present invention may provide a method for forming a multilayer microconnector structure comprising depositing a plurality of layers, wherein the layers comprise one or more of a metal material, a sacrificial mold material, and a dielectric material, thereby forming a multilayer microconnector structure. The structure may include a base layer having first and second opposing surfaces and having a plurality of vias extending therebetween; a conductive material disposed within the vias and configured to provide electrical communication between the first and second surfaces; a first layer of conductor material disposed over the base layer at the first surface, the conductive layer comprising a plurality of electrically isolated upper conductive connector portions, each upper connector portion disposed in electrical communication with the conductive material of a respective via; and a second layer of conductor material disposed over the base layer at the second surface, the second conductive layer comprising a plurality of electrically isolated conductive lower connector portions, each lower connector portion disposed in electrical communication with the conductive material of a respective via, wherein the upper and lower conductor portions are structured to provide a microconnector.
The foregoing summary and the following detailed description of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be further understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings, in which:
The present invention, in one of its aspects, relates to electric, electronic and/or electromagnetic devices, and/or processes thereof. Exemplary devices in accordance with the present invention may provide DC-110 GHz interconnect components for use in phased array systems exhibiting high density, broadband performance, and/or relatively low-loss. (While DC-110 GHz is used as an example, it should be understood that other suitable frequency bands may be used, such as DC to 50, 100, 150, 250 or more GHz, for example.). The devices and methods of the present invention may provide structures that can be scaled down approximately five-fold in size over current structures. In addition, approximately 50,000 parts, for example, may be fabricated at one time over a substrate with substantially no machining required, greatly reducing manufacturing cost.
In certain of its aspects, the present invention may relate to three-dimensional microstructures and/or processes thereof, such as waveguide structures, for example, which three dimensional microstructures may provide a variety of advantages. Examples of such microstructures and methods for their fabrication are illustrated at least in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,948,335, 7,405,638, 7,148,772, 7,012,489, 7,649,432, 7,656,256, 7,755,174, 7,898,356 and/or U.S. Application Pub. Nos. 2010/0109819, 2011/0210807, 2010/0296252, 2011/0273241, 2011/0123783, 2011/0181376 and/or 2011/0181377, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety (hereinafter the “incorporated PolyStrata art”). As used herein, the term “PolyStrata” refers to the devices made by, or methods detailed in, any of the aforementioned and incorporated U.S. Patents and Published Applications. While the PolyStrata processes are one way to produce such structures, any other suitable methods to create similar electromechanical precision structures could be employed. For example processes such as Deep Reactive Ion Etching, micromolding, LIGA, 3D printing, and so on could be leveraged.
Referring now to the figures, wherein like elements are numbered alike throughout,
In order to conveniently and reliably provide the multitudinous connections that may be required between the system electronics 110 and individual antennas 132, 134, 136, the connectors 122, 124, 126 of the present invention may be provided as a two dimensional array 200 of coaxial connectors 210,
Alternatively or additionally, the array 200 may include one or more male and female blindmate interconnects 310, 320, respectively, each including a respective center conductor 312, 336 and outer conductor 314, 334 to provide a coaxial structure,
As a further optional configuration, the center conductor 412 may be mounted to a tilt element 430, such as flexure, spring or gimbal, for example, to permit tilting of the center conductor 412 relative to the substrate 416 within the outer conductor 414 to compensate for misalignment,
Turning to
The vias 218, 219 may conveniently have a generally cylindrical or other suitable shape. At an upper surface 211 of the substrate 216 generally cylindrical metal center conductors 212 may be disposed in electrical communication with respective center conductor metal plugs 230. Likewise, outer conductors 214 may be disposed at the upper surface 211 of the substrate in electrical communication with respective outer conductor metal plugs 232. The center and outer conductors 212, 214 may have rounded tips to aid in alignment. When formed out of plane of the substrate, such rounding may be accomplished by chemical or electropolishing a cylindrical form, tumbling in a abrasive powder, forming the approximate shape in a stepped manner, or any other suitable means. At a lower surface 217 of the substrate 216, center conductor mounting feet 213 may be provided in electrical communication with respective center conductor metal plugs 230, and outer conductor mounting feet 215 may be provided in electrical connection with outer conductor metal plugs 232 so the mounting feet 213, 215 are in electrical communication with the center and outer conductors 212, 214, respectively. Thus parts that are symmetric or asymmetric on either side of the substrate may formed depending on whether one is creating a floating connector bullet, a connector end, a connector adapter designed to go from a traditional coaxial or micro-coaxial cable, or from a circuit board waveguide such a co-planar waveguide or a microstrip to a connector. In addition, a high density DC connector could be formed by only fabricating center conductor pin 212 without the outer conductor 214, and both RF and DC connectors may be fabricated simultaneously. It is also possible to fabricate the center and outer conductors 212, 214 independently. An RF connector array of elements which share (completely or partially) a common outer conductor could also be fabricated using this approach.
The impedance through the substrate 216 may be maintained by either increasing the outer conductor diameter or decreasing the center conductor diameter or both. Other suitable techniques to match impedance may be used, including those known in the art of microwave structures. A two axis gimbal 250 can be constructed as a flexure, similar to that described above with respect to
While a gimbal or flexure can be constructed in a multi-layer build process similar to PolyStrata to address angular stress or misalignment, and elastic deformation can be leveraged within the limits of the materials and designs for providing contact force between mating components, one can also leverage flexures and/or spring deflections both along the axis and/or perpendicular to the axis of the coaxial connector center and/or outer conductors to help ensure mechanical contact between connected components over temperature cycles, mechanical shock, and vibration. In the event that DC signals are not required over the bandwidth of operation, one can design the connectors to provide microwave continuity when the connector ends are in suitable proximity by capacitive coupling or radiative coupling between mating connector ends separated by an air-gap or dielectric layer. For example, the region containing the mounting feet 213, 215 of the connector 210 shown in
In an alternative exemplary configuration, the connector array 300 may comprise a plurality of female blindmate interconnects 320 as shown in the side cross-sectional view of
The figures, such as
Such connector structures, coaxial or hollow waveguide, could be hermetic. In such cases, plugged via structures may be used to pass an electrical signal from inside to outside a substrate layer. In such cases, the substrate may contain a metalized region outside the perimeter of the coax or waveguide used to make a solder seal, although any alternative compatible means to attach the connector structure to a hermetic housing could be leveraged.
The connectors themselves, such as connectors 210, 310, 320, could incorporate a selectively deposited or applied thin solder layer at or near their mating surfaces. This would allow a modular build of a complex system and testing of it. Once the system tests well, a selective or non-selective application of heat would cause the make-break interconnect to become a permanent junction requiring yet another reflow of the solder at the mating surfaces to remove the parts. A conductive epoxy could serve a similar function, and for example, could be used in a partially cured “B-stage” during assembly and test, and only reflowed to permanently join the mating surfaces when desired. This could improve reliability during temperature cycles, shock, and vibration for the assembled system.
Turning now to
Step 730 may be repeated multiple times as added layer upon layers (per the PolyStrata or similar multilayer additive build techniques) for increased aspect ratio, such as up to 10:1, for example. Step 730 may also be repeated to add complexity, such as providing detents, flares, or up or down tapering, as well as to allow the metal conductors 736, 738 to act as flexures. Mechanical analysis may provide a basis for selecting the base construction material of the conductors 736, 738 from one or more of Cu, Ni, Be:Cu, and/or NiCo, and the like, for example, based on a deformation and/or contact force mechanical analysis. For instance, 3× standard hardness nickel (for example doped, alloyed, or microstructured) may be selected for use in high aspect ratio springs. While nickel core materials which may be used for building these structures may exhibit loss due to lower electrical conductivity and magnetic properties, above 10 GHz, substantially all of the RF energy may propagate in a conformal gold, silver, or other highly conductive surface coating. In particular, an analysis of the skin depth requirements may allow electroless conformal coatings of Cu/Pd/Au, Ni/Au, Ni/Ag/Au or other coatings as typically used in the microwave connector industry to provide low-loss coatings to 2-3 skin depths even at the low end of the band,
To achieve a smooth or rounded or radiused end surfaces for the connectors, turning to
In yet a further aspect of the present invention, coaxial right angle connectors 810 may be provided,
Additional functionality may be incorporated into the structures by incorporating active or passive electronics into the connector structures themselves. For example, in
The substrate 216 in
Lateral interconnects may be formed along the edge of a device or circuit substrate and may or may not include a perpendicular transition in the connector. For example, such coaxial connectors may be placed or attached along the edge of a microwave hybrid circuit allowing such circuits to be built as separate modules and then interconnected to form more complex devices and/or assemblies. The connectors may be formed or co-fabricated as part of the microwave circuit or could be attached in a 1D or 2D array along one or more edges. Thus a number of microwave circuit board or circuits on ceramic or formed in PolyStrata can be interconnected or joined in a plane. When not formed as part of the circuit, lateral connectors may be formed individually or as 1D arrays including stacked arrays in or on part of a substrate in a batch manufacturing mode, where the format or shape may be that of
While the lateral interconnects may be used to allow modular plug-n-play builds, a surface mount transitioning to surface normal microconnector may be constructed using a different architecture. The interconnects may use relatively high aspect ratio multilayer metal and/or high strength heavy gold coated Ni or NiCo cores for spring layers using plating processes that form relatively small grains. Exemplary configurations may have an approximately 10:1 aspect ratio in triple hardness nickel springs, for instance. Such aspect ratio may be obtained in one or multiple layers.
Using a batch manufacturing wafer or substrate scale approach to three-dimensional manufacturing such connectors, approximately 10,000 connectors may be made monolithically using multilayer, double sided UV-LIGA (lithography, electroplating and molding using ultraviolet light) on each 6″ laser drilled and filled via ceramic substrates. This presumes the connectors will consume approximately 1 to 1.25 mm on a side as may be the case for a mm-wave capable miniature connector. Both split-tube and/or pin/split-tube in tube constructions may be made for coaxial interconnect as well as compression spring designs.
The exemplary devices and methods described may be understood to provide a variety of benefits such as improved power handling (e.g., exceeding the power handling of push-on floating connectors while accounting for scaling laws), with increased power handling provided by larger diameter structures. Additionally, during operation and deployment connectors of the present invention may be removed for system repair and service in the field, and leveraging them in a system design such as a phased array may allow module replacement and repair of the electronic system. Moreover, whereas relatively small components, such as a conventional 1 mm barrel may be challenging to handle without specialized tools or fixtures, pre-alignment pins may be provided to guide parts together allowing hand placement and/or tool (e.g., screwdriver) leveraged removal. For example, an in-plane lateral connector may be provided in any of the above device configurations which may be used to snap together components including MMICs and/or modules into higher level assemblies at the board level. Such an interconnect can be formed with the device and/or mounted to existing devices. In addition, a maximized and/or improved aspect ratio as compared to related mechanical turning operations is realized in the present invention. Still further devices and methods of the present invention may provide increased mechanical strength between the fused layers, and since mechanical strain may be placed on metals, near bulk strength adhesion between said layers may be desirable.
These and other advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing specification. For instance, the devices and methods of the present invention have been exemplified as providing parts which include a dielectric substrate which is incorporated in the final part. Alternatively, the substrate may provide a mounting surface for the PolyStrata build processes in which a dielectric layer(s) are deposited in selected strata above the substrate, and the part so formed and containing the dielectric layer(s) may be subsequently removed from the substrate. Accordingly, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. It should therefore be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is intended to include all changes and modifications that are within the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/493,517, filed on Jun. 6, 2011, the entire contents of which application are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2812501 | Sommers | Nov 1957 | A |
2914766 | Butler | Nov 1959 | A |
2997519 | Hines et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3309632 | Trudeau | Mar 1967 | A |
3311966 | Jones et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3335489 | Grant | Aug 1967 | A |
3352730 | Murch, Jr. | Nov 1967 | A |
3464855 | Quintana et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3560896 | Essinger | Feb 1971 | A |
3760306 | Spinner et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3775844 | Parks | Dec 1973 | A |
3789129 | Ditscheid | Jan 1974 | A |
3791858 | McPherson et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3963999 | Nakajima et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4021789 | Furman et al. | May 1977 | A |
4075757 | Malm et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4275944 | Sochor | Jun 1981 | A |
4348253 | Subbarao et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4365222 | Lampert et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4414424 | Mizoguchi et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4417393 | Becker | Nov 1983 | A |
4437074 | Cohen et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4521755 | Carlson et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4581301 | Michaelson | Apr 1986 | A |
4591411 | Reimann | May 1986 | A |
4641140 | Heckaman | Feb 1987 | A |
4663497 | Reimann | May 1987 | A |
4673904 | Landis | Jun 1987 | A |
4700159 | Jones, III | Oct 1987 | A |
4771294 | Wasilousky | Sep 1988 | A |
4808273 | Hua et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4853656 | Guillou | Aug 1989 | A |
4856184 | Doeling | Aug 1989 | A |
4857418 | Schuetz | Aug 1989 | A |
4876322 | Budde et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4880684 | Boss et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4969979 | Appelt et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975142 | Iannacone et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5069749 | Gutierrez | Dec 1991 | A |
5072201 | Devaux et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5100501 | Blumenthal et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5119049 | Heller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5227013 | Kumar | Jul 1993 | A |
5334956 | Leding et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5381157 | Shiga | Jan 1995 | A |
5406235 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406423 | Sato | Apr 1995 | A |
5430257 | Lau et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5454161 | Beilin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5622895 | Frank et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633615 | Quan | May 1997 | A |
5682062 | Gaul | Oct 1997 | A |
5682124 | Suski | Oct 1997 | A |
5712607 | Dittmer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724012 | Teunisse | Mar 1998 | A |
5746868 | Abe | May 1998 | A |
5793272 | Burghartz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5814889 | Gaul | Sep 1998 | A |
5860812 | Gugliotti | Jan 1999 | A |
5872399 | Lee | Feb 1999 | A |
5925206 | Boyko et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961347 | Hsu | Oct 1999 | A |
5977842 | Brown | Nov 1999 | A |
5990768 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008102 | Alford et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027630 | Cohen | Feb 2000 | A |
6054252 | Lundy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6180261 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6210221 | Maury | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228466 | Tsukada | May 2001 | B1 |
6294965 | Merrill et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6350633 | Lin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6388198 | Bertin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6457979 | Dove et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465747 | DiStefano | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466112 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6514845 | Eng | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518165 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535088 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6589594 | Hembree | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600395 | Handforth et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603376 | Handforth et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6648653 | Huang et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662443 | Chou et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677248 | Kwon | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6749737 | Cheng | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800360 | Miyanaga | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6800555 | Test | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6827608 | Hall et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850084 | Hembree | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888427 | Sinsheimer et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6943452 | Bertin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6971913 | Chu | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981414 | Knowles et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7005750 | Liu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012489 | Sherrer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7064449 | Lin | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077697 | Kooiman | Jul 2006 | B2 |
D530674 | Ko | Oct 2006 | S |
7129163 | Sherrer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7148141 | Shim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148772 | Sherrer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165974 | Kooiman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7217156 | Wang | May 2007 | B2 |
7222420 | Moriizumi | May 2007 | B2 |
7239219 | Brown et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252861 | Smalley | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259640 | Brown et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7400222 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405638 | Sherrer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7449784 | Sherrer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478475 | Hall | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7508065 | Sherrer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7575474 | Dodson et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7579553 | Moriizumi | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7602059 | Nobutaka et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7649432 | Sherrer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656256 | Houck et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658831 | Mathieu et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7705456 | Hu | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7755174 | Rollin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7898356 | Sherrer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7948335 | Sherrer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8011959 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8031037 | Sherrer et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8304666 | Ko et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8339232 | Lotfi | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8441118 | Hua | May 2013 | B2 |
8522430 | Kacker et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542079 | Sherrer et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20020075104 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030029729 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030052755 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030117237 | Niu | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030221968 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030222738 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004061 | Merdan | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007468 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007470 | Smalley | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040038586 | Hall et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076806 | Miyanaga et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040196112 | Welbon | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040263290 | Sherrer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030124 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045484 | Smalley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050156693 | Dove et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230145 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250253 | Cheung | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080191817 | Sherrer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240656 | Rollin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090154972 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100015850 | Stein | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100109819 | Houck et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100296252 | Rollin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110123783 | Sherrer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110181376 | Vanhille et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181377 | Vanhille et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110210807 | Sherrer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110273241 | Sherrer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130050055 | Paradiso et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130127577 | Lotfi | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2055116 | May 1992 | CA |
3623093 | Jan 1988 | DE |
398019 | Nov 1990 | EP |
485831 | May 1992 | EP |
845831 | Jun 1998 | EP |
911903 | Apr 1999 | EP |
2086327 | Dec 1971 | FR |
3027587 | Feb 1991 | JP |
6085510 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6302964 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H10041710 | Feb 1998 | JP |
I244799BB | Dec 2005 | TW |
0007218 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0039854 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0206152 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02080279 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2004004061 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sherrer, D, Vanhille, K, Rollin, J.M., “PolyStrata Technology: A Disruptive Approach for 3D Microwave Components and Modules,” Presentation (Apr. 23, 2010). |
All Darwish et al.; Vertical Balun and Wilkinson Divider; 2002 IEEE MTT-S Digest; pp. 109-112. |
Brown et al., “A Low-Loss Ka-Band Filter in Rectangular Coax Made by Electrochemical Fabrication”, submitted to Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, date unknown (downloaded from www.memgen.com, 2004). |
Chwomnawang et al., “On-chip 3D Air Core Micro-Inductor for High-Frequency Applications Using Deformation of Sacrificial Polymer”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 4334, pp. 54-62, Mar. 2001. |
Cole, B.E., et al., Micromachined Pixel Arrays Integrated with CMOS for Infrared Applications, pp. 64-64 (2000). |
De Los Santos, H.J., Introduction to Microelectromechanical (MEM) Microwave Systems (pp. 4, 7-8, 13) (1999). |
Deyong, C., et al., A Microstructure Semiconductor Thermocouple for Microwave Power Sensors, 1997 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, pp. 917-919. |
Elliott Brown/MEMGen Corporation, “RF Applications of EFAB Technology”, MTT-S IMS 2003, pp. 1-15. |
Engelmann et al., “Fabrication of High Depth-to-Width Aspect Ratio Microstructures”, IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Feb. 1992), pp. 93-98. |
Filipovic, et al., “Modeling, Design, Fabrication, and Performance of Rectangular u-Coaxial Lines and Components”, Microwave Symposium Digest, 2006, IEEE; Jun. 1, 2006; pp. 1393-1396. |
Franssila, S., Introduction to Microfabrication, (pp. 8) (2004). |
Frazier et al., “Metallic Microstructures Fabricated Using Photosensitive Polyimide Electroplating Molds”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 2, No. 2, Jun. 1993, pp. 87-94. |
Ghodisian, B., et al., Fabrication of Affordable Metallic Microstructures by Electroplating and Photoresist Molds, 1996, pp. 68-71. |
H. Guckel, “High-Aspect-Ratio Micromachining Via Deep X-Ray Lithography”, Proc. of IEEE, vol. 86, No. 8 (Aug. 1998), pp. 1586-1593. |
Hawkins, C.F., The Microelectronics Failure Analysis, Desk Reference Edition (2004). |
Jeong, Inho et al., “High-Performance Air-Gap Transmission Lines and Inductors for Millimeter-Wave Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Dec. 2002, pp. 2850-2855, vol. 50, No. 12. |
Katehi et al., “MEMS and Si Micromachined Circuits for High-Frequency Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 858-866. |
Kwok, P.Y., et al., Fluid Effects in Vibrating Micromachined Structures, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Aug. 2005, pp. 770-781. |
Lee et al., “Micromachining Applications of a High Resolution Ultrathick Photoresist”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (6), Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 3012-3016. |
Loechel et al., “Application of Ultraviolet Depth Lithography for Surface Micromachining”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (6), Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 2934-2939. |
Madou, M.J., Fundamentals of Microfabrication: The Science of Miniaturization, 2d Ed., 2002 (Roadmap; pp. 615-668). |
Park et al., “Electroplated Micro-Inductors and Micro-Transformers for Wireless application”, IMAPS 2002, Denver, CO, Sep. 2002. |
Sedky, S., Post-Processing Techniques for Integrated MEMS (pp. 9, 11, 164) (2006). |
Tummala et al.; “Microelectronics Packaging Handbook”; Jan. 1, 1989; XP002477031; pp. 710-714. |
Yeh, J.L., et al., Copper-Encapsulated Silicon Micromachined Structures, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 9, No. 3, Sep. 2000, pp. 281-287. |
Yoon et al., “3-D Lithography and Metal Surface Micromachining for RF and Microwave MEMs” IEEE MEMS 2002 Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 2002, pp. 673-676. |
Yoon et al., “CMOS-Compatible Surface Micromachined Suspended-Spiral Inductors for Multi-GHz Sillicon RF Ics”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 10, Oct. 2002, pp. 591-593. |
Yoon et al., “High-Performance Electroplated Solenoid-Type Integrated Inductor (Sl2) for RF Applications Using Simple 3D Surface Micromachining Technology”, Int'l Election Devices Meeting, 1998, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 544-547. |
Yoon et al., “High-Performance Three-Dimensional On-Chip Inductors Fabricated by Novel Micromahining Technology for RF MMIC”, 1999 IEEE MTT-S Int'l Microwave Symposium Digest., vol. 4, Jun. 13-19, 1999, Anaheim, California, pp. 1523-1526. |
Yoon et al., “Monolithic High-Q Overhang Inductors Fabricated on Silicon and Glass Substrates”, International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington D.C. (Dec. 1999), pp. 753-756. |
Yoon et al., “Monolithic Integration of 3-D Electroplated Microstructures with Unlimited Number of Levels Using Planarization with a Sacrificial Metallic Mole (PSMm)”, Twelfth IEEE Int'l Conf. on Micro Electro mechanical systems, Orlando Florida, Jan. 1999, pp. 624-629. |
Yoon et al., “Multilevel Microstructure Fabrication Using Single-Step 3D Photolithography and Single-Step Electroplating”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3512, (Sep. 1998), pp. 358-366. |
Saito, Y., Fontaine, D., Rollin, J-M., Filipovic, D., “Micro-Coaxial Ka-Band Gysel Power Dividers,” Microwave Opt Technol Lett 52: 474-478, 2010. |
Kenneth J. Vanhille et al.; Micro-Coaxial Imedance Transformers; Journal of Latex Class Files; vol. 6; No. 1; Jan. 2007. |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 21, 2013 for EP Application No. 07150463.3. |
Chance, G.I. et al., “A suspended-membrane balanced frequency doubler at 200GHz,” 29th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, pp. 321-322, Karlsrube, 2004. |
Immorlica, Jr., T. et al., “Miniature 3D micro-machined solid state power amplifiers,” COMCAS 2008. |
Ehsan, N. et al., “Microcoaxial lines for active hybrid-monolithic circuits,” 2009 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave.Symp. Boston, MA, Jun. 2009. |
Filipovic, D. et al., “Monolithic rectangular coaxial lines. Components and systems for commercial and defense applications,” Presented at 2008 IASTED Antennas, Radar, and Wave Propagation Conferences, Baltimore, MD, USA, Apr. 2008. |
Filipovic, D.S., “Design of microfabricated rectangular coaxial lines and components for mm-wave applications,” Microwave Review, vol. 12, No. 2, Nov. 2006, pp. 11-16. |
Ingram, D.L. et al., “A 427 mW 20% compact W-band InP HEMT MMIC power amplifier,” IEEE RFIC Symp. Digest 1999, pp. 95-98. |
Lukic, M. et al., “Surface-micromachined dual Ka-band cavity backed patch antennas,” IEEE Trans. AtennasPropag., vol. 55, pp. 2107-2110, Jul. 2007. |
Oliver, J.M. et al., “A 3-D micromachined W-band cavity backed patch antenna array with integrated rectacoax transition to wave guide,” 2009 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, Boston, MA 2009. |
Rollin, J.M. et al., “A membrane planar diode for 200GHz mixing applications,” 29th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, pp. 205-206, Karlsrube, 2004. |
Rollin, J.M. et al., “Integrated Schottky diode for a sub-harmonic mixer at millimetre wavelengths,” 31st International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, Paris, 2006. |
Saito et al., “Analysis and design of monolithic rectangular coaxial lines for minimum coupling,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, pp. 2521-2530, Dec. 2007. |
Vanhille, K. et al., “Balanced low-loss Ka-band p-coaxial hybrids,” IEEE MTT-S Dig., Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 2007. |
Vanhille, K. et al., “Ka-Band surface mount directional coupler fabricated using micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” 2008 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, 2008. |
Vanhille, K.J. et al., “Ka-band miniaturized quasi-planar high-Q resonators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1272-1279, Jun. 2007. |
Vyas R. et al., “Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP): The ultimate solution for low-cost RF flexible electronics and antennas,” Antennas and Propagation Society, International Symposium, p. 1729-1732 (2007). |
Wang, H. et al., “Design of a low integrated sub-harmonic mixer at 183GHz using European Schottky diode technology,” From Proceedings of the 4th ESA workshop on Millimetre-Wave Technology and Applications, pp. 249-252, Espoo, Finland, Feb. 2006. |
Wang, H. et al., “Power-amplifier modules covering 70-113 GHz using MMICs,” IEEE Trans Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 39, pp. 9-16, Jan. 2001. |
Vanhille, K., “Design and Characterization of Microfabricated Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Components,” Dissertation, 2007. |
Ehsan, N., “Broadband Microwave Litographic 3D Components,” Dissertation 2009. |
Colantonio, P., et al., “High Efficiency RF and Microwave Solid State Power Amplifiers,” pp. 380-395, 2009. |
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Apr. 6, 2010. |
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Feb. 22, 2012. |
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Nov. 10, 2008. |
European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 07150463.3 dated Apr. 23, 2012. |
European Search Report of Corresponding European Application No. 07 15 0467 mailed Apr. 28, 2008. |
European Search Report of corresponding European Application No. 08 15 3138 mailed Jul. 4, 2008. |
European Search Report of corresponding European Application No. 08153138.6 mailed Jul. 15, 2008. |
European Search Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 24, 2012 for corresponding PCT/US2011/022173. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 19, 2006 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
Jeong, I., et al., “High Performance Air-Gap Transmission Lines and Inductors for Milimeter-Wave Applications”, Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002. |
PwrSoC Update 2012: Technology, Challenges, and Opportunities for Power Supply on Chip, Presentation (Mar. 18, 2013). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
Yoon et al., “High-Performance Electroplated Solenoid-Type Integrated Inductor (S12) for RF Applications Using Simple 3D Surface Micromachining Technology”, Int'l Election Devices Meeting, 1998, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 544-547. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61493517 | Jun 2011 | US |