Batching notifications of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9292833
  • Patent Number
    9,292,833
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 14, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 22, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods of batched notifications of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment are disclosed. In one aspect, embodiments of the present disclosure include a method, which may be implemented on a system, for detecting activities occurring in an online collaboration environment, generating a notification event for one or more of the activities, and selecting one or more recipients for each notification event according to criteria determined based on a workspace in which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The indications of each notification event are then added to one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients and, upon expiry of a queue timer, the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients are sent to the corresponding one or more recipients as batched notifications.
Description
BACKGROUND

As electronic and digital content use in enterprise settings and/or other organizational settings has become the preferred mechanism for project, task, and work flow management, so has the need for streamlined collaboration and sharing of digital content and documents. In such collaboration environments, multiple users share, access, and otherwise perform actions or tasks on content and files in shared workspaces. This shared access and collaboration requires high availability of the data (e.g., an unfettered ability to download and upload files) as any number of users may have access to a given file or may want to or need to perform an action on a file at any given time.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an example diagram of a system where a host server and a notification server provide batching notifications of activities that occur in an online collaboration environment to users of the online collaboration environment.



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting for organizing work items and workspaces.



FIG. 3 depicts an example diagram of a workspace in an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators through various devices.



FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in the host server of a web-based collaboration environment with batched activity notification capabilities.



FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in a notification server for providing real time or near real time notifications of activities that occur in a web-based or online collaboration environment.



FIG. 6 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for sending a batched notification including an indication of one or more activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment, according to an embodiment.



FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B depict diagrams illustrating an example of collaboration between users of a workspace, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 8 depicts a diagram illustrating an example of collaboration between users of a workspace with multiple queues for each user, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 9 depicts a diagram illustrating examples of criteria used to select notification recipients and the various pathways through which criteria are set.



FIG. 10 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for sending a batched notification of one or more activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment, according to an embodiment.



FIG. 11 depicts a diagram illustrating example processes for and parameters used in determining an ordering with which notifications of activity can be presented to a user.



FIG. 12 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be, but not necessarily are, references to the same embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.


Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.


The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the disclosure are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the disclosure. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term is the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted. It will be appreciated that same thing can be said in more than one way.


Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.


Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.


Embodiments of the present disclosure include systems and methods for batching notifications of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment. More specifically, the present disclosure includes systems and methods that provide collaborators or users of a web-based collaboration environment with the ability to be kept apprised of relevant changes in the system in a configurable and convenient manner. For example, a collaborator in the web-based collaboration environment may be associated with several types of folders (e.g., those folders the collaborator owns in the workspace, those folders the collaborator simply collaborates in, etc.). As described herein, the collaborator can provide a different set of defaults notification settings for each of the folders based on the type of folder. The default notification settings can specify, among other things, whether notifications are on or off for a folder or work item, the frequency of notifications for a folder or work item, etc.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example diagram of a system where a host server 100 and a notification server 150 provide real-time and/or batching notifications of activities that occur in an online collaboration environment to users (or collaborators) 108.


The client devices 102 can be any system and/or device, and/or any combination of devices/systems that is able to establish a connection, including wired, wireless, cellular connections with another device, a server and/or other systems such as host server 100 and/or notification server 150. Client devices 102 will typically include a display and/or other output functionalities to present information and data exchanged between among the devices 102 and/or the host server 100 and/or notification server 150.


For example, the client devices 102 can include mobile, hand held or portable devices or non-portable devices and can be any of, but not limited to, a server desktop, a desktop computer, a computer cluster, or portable devices including, a notebook, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a palmtop computer, a mobile phone, a cell phone, a smart phone, a PDA, a Blackberry device, a Treo, a handheld tablet (e.g. an iPad, a Galaxy, Xoom Tablet, etc.), a tablet PC, a thin-client, a hand held console, a hand held gaming device or console, an iPhone, and/or any other portable, mobile, hand held devices, etc. In one embodiment, the client devices 102, host server 100, and notification server 150 are coupled via a network 106. In some embodiments, the devices 102 and host server 100 may be directly connected to one another.


The input mechanism on client devices 102 can include touch screen keypad (including single touch, multi-touch, gesture sensing in 2D or 3D, etc.), a physical keypad, a mouse, a pointer, a track pad, motion detector (e.g., including 1-axis, 2-axis, 3-axis accelerometer, etc.), a light sensor, capacitance sensor, resistance sensor, temperature sensor, proximity sensor, a piezoelectric device, device orientation detector (e.g., electronic compass, tilt sensor, rotation sensor, gyroscope, accelerometer), or a combination or variation thereof.


Signals received or detected indicating user activity at client devices 102 through one or more of the above input mechanism, or others, can be used in the disclosed technology by various users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) for accessing, through network 106, a web-based collaboration environment or online collaboration platform (e.g., hosted by the host server 100).


The collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device (e.g., device 102). The digital content can include .pdf files, .doc, slides (e.g., Powerpoint slides), images, audio files, multimedia content, web pages, blogs, etc. The digital content may reside within one or more storage containers (e.g., folders). A workspace can generally refer to any grouping of a set of digital content (digital content and/or folders) in the collaboration platform. The grouping can be created, identified, or specified by a user or through other means. This user may be a creator, user, or administrative user, for example.


In general, a workspace can be associated with a set of users or collaborators (e.g., collaborators 108) which have access to the content included therein. The levels of access (e.g., based on permissions or rules) of each user or collaborator to access the content in a given workspace may be the same or may vary among the users. Additionally, each user may have their own set of access rights to every piece of content in the workspace, or each user may have different access rights to different pieces of content. Access rights may be specified by a user associated with a workspace and/or a user who created/uploaded a particular piece of content to the workspace, or any other designated user or collaborator.


In general, a workspace can be arranged in a hierarchical tree structure including any number of storage containers (e.g., folders) each including any number work items (e.g., files within each folder). The storage containers can each have one or more associated predetermined settings (for each use or for multiple users) which can be associated with the storage container within which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The predetermined settings can indicate whether, for example, notifications are enabled or disabled for that storage container and/or the types of activities or notifications that the user wants to receive with respect to that storage container. For example, each user may set different default notification settings for each folder or storage container that they have access to in the workspace. The predetermined settings can be set by a user or collaborator associated with the storage container.


In general, the collaboration platform allows multiple users or collaborators to access or collaborate efforts on work items such that each user can see, remotely, edits, revisions, comments, or annotations being made to specific work items through their own user devices. For example, a user can upload a document to a workspace for other users to access (e.g., for viewing, editing, commenting, signing-off, or otherwise manipulating). The user can login to the online platform and upload the document (or any other type of work item) to an existing workspace or to a new workspace. The document can be shared with existing users or collaborators in a workspace.


A diagrammatic illustration of the online collaboration environment and the relationships between workspaces and users/collaborators are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 2. A diagrammatic illustration of a workspace having multiple work items with which collaborators can access through multiple devices is illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 3.


In one embodiment, actions performed on work items or other activities that occur in a workspace can be detected in real time or in near real time. The host server can generate notifications or notification events for one or more of the plurality of activities and select one or more recipients for each notification event according to criteria determined based on a workspace in which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. An indication of each notification event can be subsequently added to one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients, and upon expiry of a queue timer, the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients to the corresponding one or more recipients are sent as batched notifications. Various mechanisms can be used to notify users or collaborators, including through the web interface to access the collaboration platform, via email, and/or SMS, for example.


Functions and techniques disclosed for batched notification of activities that occur in the online platform on a work item or in a workspace can be performed by a push-enabled server (e.g., the notification server 150 coupled to the host server 100 of the collaboration platform). Functions and techniques performed by the host server 100, the notification server 150, and the related components therein are described, respectively, in detail with further reference to the examples of FIG. 4-5.


In one embodiment, client devices 102 communicate with the host server 100 and/or notification server 150 over network 106. In general, network 106, over which the client devices 102, the host server 100, and/or notification server 150 communicate, may be a cellular network, a telephonic network, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet, or any combination thereof. For example, the Internet can provide file transfer, remote log in, email, news, RSS, cloud-based services, instant messaging, visual voicemail, push mail, VoIP, and other services through any known or convenient protocol, such as, but is not limited to the TCP/IP protocol, Open System Interconnections (OSI), FTP, UPnP, iSCSI, NSF, ISDN, PDH, RS-232, SDH, SONET, etc.


The network 106 can be any collection of distinct networks operating wholly or partially in conjunction to provide connectivity to the client devices 102 and the host server 100 and may appear as one or more networks to the serviced systems and devices. In one embodiment, communications to and from the client devices 102 can be achieved by, an open network, such as the Internet, or a private network, such as an intranet and/or the extranet. In one embodiment, communications can be achieved by a secure communications protocol, such as secure sockets layer (SSL), or transport layer security (TLS).


In addition, communications can be achieved via one or more networks, such as, but are not limited to, one or more of WiMax, a Local Area Network (LAN), Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), a Personal area network (PAN), a Campus area network (CAN), a Metropolitan area network (MAN), a Wide area network (WAN), a Wireless wide area network (WWAN), enabled with technologies such as, by way of example, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Communications Service (PCS), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone Service (D-Amps), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Fixed Wireless Data, 2G, 2.5G, 3G, 4G, IMT-Advanced, pre-4G, 3G LTE, 3GPP LTE, LTE Advanced, mobile WiMax, WiMax 2, WirelessMAN-Advanced networks, enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), General packet radio service (GPRS), enhanced GPRS, iBurst, UMTS, HSPDA, HSUPA, HSPA, UMTS-TDD, 1×RTT, EV-DO, messaging protocols such as, TCP/IP, SMS, MMS, extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP), real time messaging protocol (RTMP), instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP), instant messaging, USSD, IRC, or any other wireless data networks or messaging protocols.



FIG. 2 depicts an example diagram of a web-based or online collaboration platform deployed in an enterprise or other organizational setting 250 for organizing work items 215, 235, 255 and workspaces 205, 225, 245.


The web-based platform for collaborating on projects or jointly working on documents can be used by individual users and shared among collaborators. In addition, the collaboration platform can be deployed in an organized setting including but not limited to, a company (e.g., an enterprise setting), a department in a company, an academic institution, a department in an academic institution, a class or course setting, or any other types of organizations or organized setting.


When deployed in an organizational setting, multiple workspaces (e.g., workspace A, B, C) can be created to support different projects or a variety of work flows. Each workspace can have its own associated work items. For example, workspace A 205 may be associated with work items 215, workspace B 225 can be associated with work items 235, and workspace N can be associated with work items 255. The work items 215, 235, and 255 may be unique to each workspace but need not be. For example, a particular word document can be associated with only one workspace (e.g., workspace A 205) or it may be associated with multiple workspaces (e.g., Workspace A 205 and workspace B 225, etc.).


In general, each workspace has a set of users or collaborators associated with it. For example, workspace A 205 is associated with multiple users or collaborators 206. In some instances, workspaces deployed in an enterprise may be department specific. For example, workspace B may be associated with department 210 and some users shown as example user A 208 and workspace N 245 can be associated with departments 212 and 216 and users shown as example user B 214.


Each user associated with a workspace can generally access the work items associated with the workspace. The level of access will depend on permissions associated with the specific workspace, and/or with a specific work item. Permissions can be set for the workspace or set individually on a per work item basis. For example, the creator of a workspace (e.g., one of user A 208 who creates workspace B) can set one permission setting applicable to all work items 235 for other associated users and/or users associated with the affiliate department 210, for example. Creator user A 208 may also set different permission settings for each work item, which may be the same for different users, or varying for different users.


In each workspace A, B . . . N, when an action is performed on a work item by a given user or any other activity is detected in the workspace, other users in the same workspace may be notified. The notifications can be sent in real time or in near real time. Alternatively or additionally, the notifications can be batched and sent upon expiry of a timer which can be, in some instances, configurable by each of the associated users or collaborators in the workspace. Additionally, predetermined settings can be associated with each workspace and/or each storage container and/or each work item. In some cases, the predetermined settings can indicate whether or not the user wants notification of specific activities and/or the frequency with which the user would like those notifications. Activities which trigger notifications can include, by way of example but not limitation, adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace, adding, deleting, viewing, or modifying a work item in the workspace, and/or creating, responding, or viewing a discussion topic in the workspace.


The activity can be performed in relation to a discussion topic in the workspace, for example, adding a response to a discussion topic, deleting a response, or editing a response in the workspace. In addition, the activity is performed on a work item in the workspace by the user, including, by way of example but not limitation, download or upload of a work item, deletion of editing of the work item, selecting, adding, deleting, and modifying a tag in the work item, preview of the work item or comment of the work item, setting or changing permissions of the work item, sharing a work item, emailing a link to the work item, and/or embedding a link to the work item on another website.



FIG. 3 depicts an example diagram of a workspace 302 in an online or web-based collaboration environment accessible by multiple collaborators 322 through various devices.


Each of users 316, 318, and 320 can individually use multiple different devices to access and/or manipulate work items 324 in the workspace 302 with which they are associated with. For example users 316, 318, 320 can be collaborators on a project to which work items 324 are relevant. Since the work items 324 are hosted by the collaboration environment (e.g., a cloud-based environment), each user can access the work items 324 anytime, and from any physical location using any device (e.g., including devices they own or any shared/public/loaner device).


Each user can be notified of actions performed on work items 324 by other users or any other types of activities detected in the workspace 302. For example, if user 316 modifies a document, one or both of the other collaborators 318 and 320 can be notified of the modification in real time, or near real-time, and/or via a batched notification after a specified and/or configurable period of time. The notifications can be sent through any or all of the devices associated with a given user, in various formats including, one or more of, email, SMS, or via a pop-up window in a user interface in which the user uses to access the collaboration platform. In the event of multiple real-time or batched notifications, each notification can be depicted preferentially (e.g., ordering in the user interface) based on user preferences and/or relevance to the user (e.g., implicit or explicit). Examples of sending and/or presenting notifications to users is discussed in greater detail with respect to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/152,982 entitled “Real Time Notification of Activities that occur in a Web-based Collaboration Environment,” which was filed on Jun. 3, 2011, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein.



FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in the host server 400 of a web-based collaboration environment with real-time (or near real-time) and/or batched activity notification capabilities.


The host server 400 of the web-based or online collaboration environment can generally be a cloud-based service. The host server 400 can include, for example, a network interface 402, an activity detector 405, a notification engine 415, a permissions manager 435 and/or a notification prioritizer 455. The notification engine 415 can include a notification server manager 416, a recipient selection module 417, a notification generation module 418, a queue manager module 419, and a configuration manager module 420. The permission manager 435 can include a workspace manager 436, a collaboration manager 438, an organization tracker 440 having an enterprise tracker 441, and a work item manager 442. The notification prioritizer 455 can include a rules module 456, a chronological ordering engine 458, and a relevance assessor 460 which can further include a contextual characteristics module 461 and a temporal characteristics module 462. Additional or fewer components/modules/engines can be included in the host server 400 and each illustrated component.


The network interface 402 can be a networking module that enables the host server 400 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server 400, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface 402 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card (e.g., SMS interface, WiFi interface, interfaces for various generations of mobile communication standards including but not limited to 1G, 2G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, LTE, etc.), Bluetooth, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.


As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” a “handler,” a “detector,” an “interface,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, hander, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, handler, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. 101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.


One embodiment of the host server 400 includes the activity detector 405 which can detect an activity in the web-based collaboration environment. The activity can be a triggering activity which causes a notification to be generated and/or added to one or more queues associated with selected or relevant users so that those selected or relevant users are notified of the occurrence of the activity in real-time or near real time and/or in a batched notification at a later time.


The detected activity can be performed by a user or collaborator in a workspace and can be performed on a work item or relating to a work item, for example, download or upload of the work item, previewing, commenting of a work item, deletion or editing of the work item, commenting on a work item, identifying, selecting, adding, deleting, saving, editing, and modifying a tag in the work item, setting or changing permissions of the work item, sharing the work item including, for example, emailing a link to the work item, embedding a link to the work item on another website.


The types of activities that can be detected can also relate to changes to a workspace, such as adding, deleting, or modifying collaborators in the workspace; changes to work items such as adding, deleting a work item in the workspace; creating a discussion topic in the workspace, adding a response to a discussion topic, deleting a response, or editing a response in the workspace.


Detected activity in a workspace that is performed by a user or otherwise occurring can trigger notifications to be generated and sent out in real-time or near real-time and/or subsequently sent out via a batched notifications at later times via, for example, the notification engine 415. The notification engine 415 can notify users, which can be collaborators with the user who performed the activity in the workspace, via one or more of many mechanisms, including but not limited to, email, SMS, voice-message, text-based message, RSS, feed, etc. The mechanisms can be configurable by each user or collaborator based on the type of activity that occurred and/or where the activity occurred in the workspace (e.g., which storage container or folder in the workspace).


In one embodiment, the notification is depicted through a web-browser to another user in the web-based collaboration environment. In some embodiments, the notification can be depicted in real-time or near real-time to the time in which the activity was performed by the user and/or at some later time in a batched notification with other notifications that are to be depicted to the user. When notifying a user in real-time or through the use of a batched notification using a web-browser, the notification engine 415 can utilize a push-enabled service. In one embodiment, the real-time or batched notifications are sent by a component or another server which implements push technology (e.g., the notification server 500 shown in the example of FIG. 5). The push-enabled service can be implemented via long poll or HTTP streaming, for example, by the notification server 500 or another component, device which may be internal to or external to the host server 400. In addition, the host server 400 could utilize other push servers including third party push servers to implement push technology including but not limited to mobile platform push systems and services (e.g., via smart phones or tablets or other portable devices such as iPhone, Android phones, Blackberry, iPad, Galaxy or other tablets, etc.).


The host server 400 can send a notification server an identification of the recipient to be notified and an indicator of the one or more activities to notify the recipient of (e.g., via a batched notification). The indicator of the one or more activities to notify the recipient of can be in the form of a batched notification which comprises one or more notifications that are stored in a queue associated with the recipient. Alternatively or additionally, the host server 400 can send the notification server the address or location or multiple locations of the queue(s) from which to read and send the notifications as a batched notification to the user. Use of an external push server, such as the notification server 550 is described with further reference to the example of FIG. 5.


The notification server 550 can be managed by the notification server manager 416 in the notification engine 415 which can communicate events to notify users in real-time via their browser interfaces or queue up notifications to send users batched notifications. In one embodiment, the host server sends a notification server an identification of the recipient to be notified and/or an indicator of the one or more activities to notify the recipient of (e.g., via a real-time and/or batched notification).


The recipient selection module 417 can select one or more users for each notification event. For example, the selection module 417 can select one or more recipients for each notification or notification event that is generated by the notification generation module 418. The recipients can be selected, for example, according to criteria determined based on a workspace in which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The criteria may be determined in a variety of ways. For example, the criteria can be determined based on an affiliation with a workspace or storage container in which the activity was performed in the online collaboration platform, or based on an affiliation with the work item on which the activity was performed. Alternatively or additionally, the criteria can be determined based on permissions configured for the workspace, storage container, or work item. Alternatively or additionally, the criteria can be configured based on predetermined settings configured for the workspace, storage container or folder, and/or individual work items. Examples of combinations and/or variations of the criteria is discussed in greater detail with reference to FIG. 9.


The queue manager module 419 can manage the one or more queues associated with each of the users of the online collaboration environment. For example, the queue manager module 419 can manage notifications to the one or more queues, queue timers, etc. Additionally, the queue manager module 419 may manage allocation/deallocation of memory for the queues in the host system or an external memory system.


The configuration manager module 420 can manage the root level of each of the users or collaborators associated with the workspace and/or the predetermined settings associated with the workspace, the storage containers, and/or the individual work items. Each user or collaborator associated with a workspace has a root level in that workspace. The root level indicates the highest level in the hierarchical tree structure that the collaborator or user can see or utilize. For example, the root level may be the level that a user is invited to collaborate in a workspace. The configuration manager module 420 also manages the predetermined settings for each of the users. For example, each user associated with each workspace can have difference notification settings associated with the workspace, with each folder or storage container with the workspace, and/or for each work item within the workspace.


The criteria that are determined by workspace permissions can be managed by the workspace manager 436 in the permissions manager 435. The recipient selection module 418 can also determine the recipient selection criteria based on user affiliation with the workspace, including, one or more of, member, invited collaborator and collaborator in the workspace. Such user affiliation can be tracked and managed by, for example, the collaboration manger 438 or the permissions manager 435.


In one embodiment, the criteria are determined, at least in part, based on permissions associated with a work item on which the activity was performed in relation to in the workspace. Permissions associated with work items can be managed, tracked, updated, revised, or implemented, in one embodiment, by the work item manager 442. For example, the permissions associated with the work item can be set by, a creator of the work item or an administrative user of the workspace. Each workspace can include multiple work items where each of multiple work items has individually configurable permissions. The individually configured permissions can be determined by user roles and rights (e.g., as managed by the collaborations manager 438). The work item manager 442 can communicate with the collaboration manager 438 in setting, configuring, or re-configuring permissions associated with work items.


The notification of a triggering activity can cause one or more notifications to be presented to a selected user in the web-based or online collaboration environment such that the notifications are accessible by the user in real time or near real time to when the triggering activity occurred. The triggering activity can be the activity occurring in the web-based or online collaboration environment or the expiry of a queue timer in the case of batched notification events. In one embodiment, the notification(s) are presented via a user interface to the online collaboration platform, for example, when the recipient (e.g., selected recipient) is accessing the workspace (e.g., the same workspace in which activity is detected) or when the recipient is accessing a different workspace. Specifically, the real time or near real time notification can be presented to the user via the user interface if the user is online (e.g., online or otherwise logged into the web-based or online collaboration environment). Alternatively or additionally, batched notifications can be presented to the user via the user interface and/or a notification sent to the user in another manner (e.g., through email). In the case of batched notification, in some embodiments, the batched notification may provide a summary of multiple notifications and/or each or the notifications in detail.


Additionally, a workspace can be associated with an enterprise and the criteria can specify that the recipient that is selected is an employee of the enterprise. Enterprise associations and affiliations can be managed by the organization tracker 440, for example; in some embodiments, enterprises and/or enterprise accounts can specifically be managed, tracked, monitored by the enterprise tracker 441. Permissions for the workspace can be configured by a creator or administrative user of the workspace. The collaboration manager 438 can determine, track, and implement relationships, roles, and/or access levels of multiple users/collaborators. For example, users may be a general user, a creator of the workspace, a creator of a work item, or an administrative user. The permissions for a workspace can be configured by a user, creator, or the administrative user and is generally managed by the collaborations manager 438.


The notification engine 415 can determine the channel through which to notify selected users or recipients of activity. The channels can be configurable by the user per workspace, per storage container or folder, and/or per work item using the configuration manager module 420. The channels that are used can include, indicators via a user interface to the online collaboration environment, SMS, audio message, text-based messages, email, desktop application, RSS, etc. The indicators presented via the user interface can include visual indicators (e.g., pop-up form including text and/or graphics), audio indicators, or any other types detectable by a user.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications in an order based on a rule, which may be configurable by the recipient or another user. Such prioritization in presentation can be determined, managed, tracked, implemented, revised, or updated by the notification prioritizer 455, for example. The notification prioritizer 455 can present the notification in the user interface among other notifications in an order based on a rule as determined by the rules module 456, for example.


The rule can indicate user preferences for notifications of activities based on one or more of, a type of activity that occurred and a user related to the activity. For example, a given user may explicitly or implicitly indicate preferences for activities or actions performed by specific other users or collaborators. A user may also indicate explicitly or implicitly preferences for types of activities that they wish to be notified of or not notified of. Users may also indicate that notifications for certain types of activities are to be prioritized other others. For example, a user may indicate that a notification for a ‘comment on’ activity is of a higher priority compared to a ‘edit’ activity.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications based on chronological order, for example as tracked or determined by the chronological ordering engine 458. For example, each notification can be depicted in the user interface based the time ordering when each associated triggering activity occurred. Notification of the most recently occurred activity can be depicted above or below other notifications, or in a location where most easily accessed by the recipient user.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in the user interface among other notifications based on relevance to the recipient, for example, as determined, tracked, monitored, or implemented by the relevance assessor 460. The relevance to the recipient can be represented by, for example, contextual and temporal parameters. For example, contextual parameters provide metrics indicating the recipient's current activity in the online collaboration platform. Current activity can be any activity of the user that occurred within a certain time frame (e.g., within the last minute, within the last 5 minutes, within the last 10 minutes, for example). Activity of the user can include: a document that the user edited, viewed, downloaded, commented on, tagged, or otherwise accessed. Activity of the user can also include activities surrounding a workspace, including creation/modification of a workspace or attributes of a workspace, such as modification of collaborators, permissions, etc.


Temporal parameters can, for example, provide metrics indicating the recipient's activities in the online collaboration platform over a period of time, a frequency with which the recipient has accessed a work item with which the activity relates to, and/or a frequency with which the recipient has accessed the workspace in which the activity was performed.


In one embodiment, notification messages can be assigned a priority rating on a scale (e.g., from 0, not important, to 100, very important) calculated depending on how much the recipient user is impacted by the notification. The impact on a user that a notification has can be indicated by, for example: 1) whether user needs to or has the option to respond to the notification? 2) whether the user (or owner) of the content that has been updated? 3) is the user active on the content that has been updated?


For notifications of user settings, assignment of priority can be based on, for example, any one or any combination of the following: 1) what are the type of events that the user wants to see more? 2) which collaborators that the user wants, likes, needs, or prefers to get the most notification from? Based on these priority ratings, notifications with a priority lower than a threshold (e.g., user-defined minimum threshold and/or system defined threshold) may not be not displayed, or displayed under select circumstances. In some instances, if too many notifications arrive at the same time, those with the highest priority are displayed. In one embodiment, similar notifications can be grouped together and assigned a priority as a group.



FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram illustrating an example of components in a notification server 550 for providing real time (or near real time) and/or batched notification of activities that occur in a web-based or online collaboration environment.


The notification server 550 generally includes, for example, a push server 505, an SMS notifier 515, and/or a priority module 525. In one embodiment, the push server 505 includes a long poll engine 506 and/or an HTTP streaming engine 508. Additional or less components/modules/engines can be included in the notification server 550 and each illustrated component.


As used herein, a “module,” “a manager,” a “handler,” a “detector,” an “interface,” a “controller,” or an “engine” includes a general purpose, dedicated or shared processor and, typically, firmware or software modules that are executed by the processor. Depending upon implementation-specific or other considerations, the module, manager, handler, or engine can be centralized or its functionality distributed. The module, manager, handler, or engine can include general or special purpose hardware, firmware, or software embodied in a computer-readable (storage) medium for execution by the processor. As used herein, a computer-readable medium or computer-readable storage medium is intended to include all mediums that are statutory (e.g., in the United States, under 35 U.S.C. 101), and to specifically exclude all mediums that are non-statutory in nature to the extent that the exclusion is necessary for a claim that includes the computer-readable (storage) medium to be valid. Known statutory computer-readable mediums include hardware (e.g., registers, random access memory (RAM), non-volatile (NV) storage, to name a few), but may or may not be limited to hardware.


The notification server 550 can support the services of a collaboration platform or environment to provide real time (or near real time) and/or batched notifications of activities. In one embodiment, the notification server 550 is integrated within a host server of a collaboration platform (e.g., the host server 100 shown in the example of FIG. 1 or the host server 400 shown in the example of FIG. 4, for example). The notification server 550 may also be externally coupled to the host server (e.g., the host server 100 or 400. In some instances, a portion of the functions implemented and performed by the notification server 550 can be implemented in part or in whole in the host server 100 or 400. For example, some of the components shown to be in the notification server 500 and associated functionalities can in part or in whole reside in the host server 100 or 400.


In one embodiment, the notification server 550 sends a notification of one or more activities that occur within a collaboration platform to a recipient. In some embodiments, the notification is sent by the server 550 such that the recipient is notified in real time (or near real time) to when the activity occurred or when the activity was performed. Alternatively or additionally, the notification can be sent as a batched notification upon expiry of a timer or upon another triggering event. Notification, including real-time notification, can be performed via push technology, for example by the push server 505 through long polls (e.g., via the long poll engine 506) and/or through the HTTP streaming (e.g., via the HTTP streaming engine 508). The notification server 550 can communicate with the host server to determine a recipient or recipients with whom to notify. The notification server 550 can also determine the activity or activities to notify the recipient of, for example through communication with the host server.


In one embodiment, the notification is presented in a feed stream among other notifications through a user interface on the user device according to relevancy to the user determined based on current or recent activity of the user in the web-based collaboration environment. The presentation priority in a user interface in a feed stream can be managed, in whole, or in part, for example, by the priority module 525 using information determined by the notification prioritizer (e.g., notification prioritizer 455 of host server 400 shown in the example of FIG. 4).


In one embodiment, the notification server 550 can send notifications to users via SMS (e.g., through the SMS notifier 515). In this instance, the notification server 500 can be coupled to an SMS center which forwards the SMS text message to a mobile device over a cellular network. The notification can be sent via SMS in real time or near real time, or with a delay.



FIG. 6 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for sending a batched notification including an indication of one or more activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment, according to an embodiment. The example process of FIG. 6 can be performed by, for example, the host server 100 and/or the notification server 150 of FIG. 1.


In process 602, a plurality of activities occurring in an online collaboration environment are detected. In process 604, a notification for one or more of the plurality of activities is generated.


In process 606, one or more recipients for each notification are selected according to criteria determined based on a workspace in which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The one or more recipients can be selected, for example, automatically by a web server which hosts the online collaboration environment/platform. Some examples of criterion used to select recipients are illustrated with further reference to the example of FIG. 9.


In one embodiment, the criteria are based on pre-determined settings associated with a storage container within which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The predetermined settings can be configured based on an affiliation with the storage container within which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The affiliation with the storage container can include one or more of a storage container owned by the recipient or a storage container in which the recipient collaborates.


In one embodiment, the predetermined settings indicate whether notifications are enabled or disabled for the storage container within which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. In one embodiment, the predetermined settings are configured by the recipient prior to the performance of the activity in the online collaboration environment.


In one embodiment, the workspace includes multiple storage containers and each of the multiple storage containers has individually configurable predetermined settings.


In one embodiment, the criteria can be based on pre-determined settings associated with a work item upon which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. In this case, the predetermined settings can be configured based on an affiliation with the work item upon which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The affiliation with the work item can include one or more of a work item owned by the recipient or a work item in which the recipient collaborates. The predetermined settings can be configured based on a type of activity performed on the work item, including, one or more of, upload, download, preview, or delete.


In process 610, upon expiry of a queue timer, the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients are sent to the corresponding one or more recipients as batched notifications. In one embodiment, the notification is sent by a server implementing push technology. The server may be a portion of the same web server or another server. The push technology can be implemented using, for example, long polls or HTTP streaming.



FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B depict diagrams illustrating an example of collaboration between user A and user B within a workspace 700, according to one embodiment. User A and user B may collaborate through the use of one or more of various devices, such as client devices 102 of FIG. 1, although other devices are possible. The devices are not shown for simplicity.


Referring first to FIG. 7A which illustrates a workspace 700 according to an embodiment. More specifically, workspace 700 is shown as it appears to user A (i.e., workspace 700A) and to user B (i.e., workspace 700B). In this example, user A is the owner of workspace 700 and user B is invited into workspace 700 (e.g., by user A, and administrator, etc.) as a collaborator at folder F130. Accordingly, folder F100 is user A's root level and folder F130 is user B's root level. In some embodiments, the host server maintains a root level for each user of the system for each workspace in which the user is a member, owner, and/or collaborates in.


As discussed above, the collaboration platform or environment hosts workspaces with work items that one or more users can access (e.g., view, edit, update, revise, comment, download, preview, tag, or otherwise manipulate, etc.). A work item can generally include any type of digital or electronic content that can be viewed or accessed via an electronic device. In this example, the digital content resides within one or more storage containers (e.g., folders) in a hierarchical tree structure within workspace 700. More specifically, workspace 700 includes top-level folder F100 having a second level folders F110, F120, and F130. Folder F110 further includes third level folders F111 and F112. Similarly, folder F130 includes third level folders F131-F135, and folder F135 includes fourth level folder F136.


Notifications of activities that occur in an online or web-based collaboration environment are added to one or more selected queues for sending batched notifications to one or more selected users upon expiry of timer(s) associated with the queue(s). Each queue can be associated with a user and each user can have multiple queues set up with predetermined (or notification) settings based on any number of factors. Accordingly, a user can setup up different default notification settings for different types of folders and/or work items so that the user receives notifications for activities occurring only in those items that he/she is interested in. Additionally, the multiple queues and batching notifications described herein allow a user to set the predetermined settings so that certain activities occurring in a workspace (e.g., activities occurring under one or more specified folders) have a higher priority notification setting than other activities occurring under other folders. The notifications associated with activities occurring within the specified higher priority folders are added to a queue that sends batched notifications to a user at a faster interval (e.g., every 15 minutes) or in real-time (or near real-time). The use of multiple queues associated with single users is discussed in greater detail with respect to FIG. 8.


The storage containers can each have one or more associated predetermined (or notification) settings which can be associated with the storage container within which the associated activity was performed in the online collaboration environment. The predetermined settings can indicate whether, for example, notifications are enabled or disabled for that storage container and/or the types of activities or notifications that the user wants to receive notifications for and at what frequency. For example, each user may set different default notification settings for each folder or storage container that they have access to in the workspace. The predetermined settings can be set by a user or collaborator associated with the storage container.


Referring next to FIG. 7B which illustrates an example of detecting and/or otherwise capturing activities in workspace 700 and selecting appropriate user(s) and/or queue(s) associated with those user(s) for notification of those activities. In this example, two activities occur. First, user B creates a new folder F137 in folder F135 and user A subsequently creates a new work item under the folder F135. Notifications for each of these activities are added to one or more queues associated with user A and/or user B.


User A may have predetermined settings for the entire workspace 700. Alternatively or additionally, default settings may be applied to all folders in the workspace based on type. These default settings can be overridden on a per folder basis. For example, user A may want notifications every thirty minutes for new folders created in the workspace. However, user A may override this default setting by changing the predetermined settings on one or more individual folders (e.g., folder F135). Likewise, user B may configure predetermined settings such that activities occurring under folder F137 (of which user B is the creator and/or owner) appear in batched notifications at a higher frequency than other folders in workspace 700B. Further, user B may set up predetermined settings so that notifications are received only for those activities that occur within folder F137 and no notification is received for activities occurring in other folders in the workspace 700B.



FIG. 8 depicts a diagram illustrating an example of a system that includes multiple queues for each user. In particular, user A includes three queues that send one or more notifications at thirty minute intervals, fifteen minute intervals, and in real time (or near real-time). The predetermined settings for each folder determine to which queue notifications for activities occurring within that folder are added and/or whether a notification is added to a queue at all. In some embodiments, if predetermined settings are not configured for a folder, then the predetermined settings for the folder one level up are used until the root folder is reached at which point default settings for the workspace may be used. Additionally, as discussed above, the predetermined settings may determine which activities, if any, trigger notifications (e.g., notify on create and/or edit, but no notification on deletion).



FIG. 9 depicts a diagram illustrating examples of criteria used to select notification recipients and the various pathways through which criteria are set.


In general, criteria can be determined within a workspace (e.g., a workspace in which a notification-triggering activity or action was performed or detected by the system). Criteria can be determined, for example, based on a user's affiliations 910, and/or the user's permissions 910, and/or user's predetermined settings 930. The user's affiliations 910 can include the user's affiliation with a workspace 912, the user's affiliation with a folder (or storage container) 914, and/or the user's affiliation with an individual work item 916. Types of user affiliations with any of the affiliations 912-916 can include, for example, a member, a user, a collaborator, or an invited collaborator. Other types of affiliations can include creator, administrator, manager, etc.


Criteria can also be determined based on the user's permissions 920. The user's permissions 920 can include the user's permissions with respect to a workspace 922, the user's permissions with respect to a folder (or storage container) 924, and/or the user's permissions with respect to an individual work item 926. Types of user permissions can include, for example, creator, administer, or owner. Other types of permissions are also possible.


Criteria can also be determined based on the user's predetermined settings 930 (or notification settings). A user may set the predetermined settings or default settings per workspace 932, and/or per folder 934 (or storage container), and/or per work item 936. Predetermined settings are typically set by the user or collaborator; however, the predetermined settings 930 can be set by creators, administrators, editors, etc.


Each criterion can be used alone or in combination with any number of others in the process of selecting recipients to notify. Additionally, in some instances, a workspace is associated with an organization such as an enterprise. In this instance the criteria used can include a requirement that the recipient that is selected is an employee of the enterprise, or other organization.



FIG. 10 depicts a flow chart illustrating an example process for sending a batched notification of one or more activities that occurred in an online collaboration environment, according to an embodiment. The example process of FIG. 10 can be performed by, for example, the host server 100 and/or the notification server 150 of FIG. 1.


In process 1002, a plurality of activities occurring in an online collaboration environment are received or detected by the host server. In process 1004, a notification for one or more of the plurality of activities is generated.


In process 1006, one or more recipients and one or more queues for each notification event are selected according to permissions determined based on a workspace and/or predetermined settings associated with a storage container in the workspace within which the associated activity was performed.


In process 1008, an indication of each notification is added to one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients.


In process 1010, upon expiry of a queue timer, the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more recipients are sent to the corresponding one or more recipients as batched notifications. In one embodiment, the notification is sent by a server implementing push technology. The server may be a portion of the same web server or another server. The push technology can be implemented using, for example, long polls or HTTP streaming.


In process 1012, the batched notification is displayed or otherwise presented to the user. For example, the notification can be presented via a user interface in the online collaboration platform and/or depicted through a web-browser to the selected user(s). The notification can also be sent to the selected user(s) via email, SMS, or in an RSS feed, for example. In another embodiment, the batched notification can be displayed in a feed stream among other notifications according to relevancy. In general relevance to the recipient can be characterized using one or more of, contextual and temporal parameters.



FIG. 11 depicts a diagram illustrating example processes for and parameters used in determining an ordering with which notifications of activity can be presented to a user in batched notifications.


A rule which specifies preferences for notifications of activities based on a type of activity and/or a user related to the activity can be used to determine ordering with which to present a notification in a user interface. Chronological ordering can be used to determine ordering with which to present a notification in a user interface.


Contextual parameters can be used to characterize relevance to the recipient in determining the ordering. Contextual parameters can include, for example, the recipient's current activity and/or collaborator's current activities. Temporal parameters can include, for example, recipient's activities over a period of time, frequency with which the recipient has accessed a work item, and/or frequency with which the recipient has accessed the workspace. Each process can be used alone or in conjunction with any number of other processes for determining the ordering of placement in the user interface of a notification in feeds.



FIG. 12 shows a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed


In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.


The machine may be a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a user device, a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a set-top box (STB), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, an iPhone, an iPad, a Blackberry, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.


While the machine-readable medium or machine-readable storage medium is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” and “machine-readable storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed technique and innovation.


In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors in a computer, cause the computer to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.


Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.


Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs), etc.), among others, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.


The network interface device enables the machine 1100 to mediate data in a network with an entity that is external to the host server, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the host and the external entity. The network interface device can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.


The network interface device can include a firewall which can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.


Other network security functions can be performed or included in the functions of the firewall, can be, for example, but are not limited to, intrusion-prevention, intrusion detection, next-generation firewall, personal firewall, etc., without deviating from the novel art of this disclosure.


Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” As used herein, the terms “connected,” “coupled,” or any variant thereof, means any connection or coupling, either direct or indirect, between two or more elements; the coupling of connection between the elements can be physical, logical, or a combination thereof. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words in the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or,” in reference to a list of two or more items, covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.


The above detailed description of embodiments of the disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the teachings to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the disclosure are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the disclosure, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified to provide alternative or subcombinations. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times. Further, any specific numbers noted herein are only examples: alternative implementations may employ differing values or ranges.


The teachings of the disclosure provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.


Any patents and applications and other references noted above, including any that may be listed in accompanying filing papers, are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects of the disclosure can be modified, if necessary, to employ the systems, functions, and concepts of the various references described above to provide yet further embodiments of the disclosure.


These and other changes can be made to the disclosure in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description describes certain embodiments of the disclosure, and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the teachings can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in its implementation details, while still being encompassed by the subject matter disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the disclosure should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the disclosure with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the disclosure encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the disclosure under the claims.


While certain aspects of the disclosure are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the disclosure in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the disclosure is recited as a means-plus-function claim under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6, other aspects may likewise be embodied as a means-plus-function claim, or in other forms, such as being embodied in a computer-readable medium. (Any claims intended to be treated under 35 U.S.C. §112, ¶6 will begin with the words “means for”.) Accordingly, the applicant reserves the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: detecting, at a host server, activities occurring in an cloud-based collaboration environment;generating, at the host server, a notification for each of a plurality of activities of
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the criteria is based on predetermined settings associated with a storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined settings are configured based on an affiliation with the storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the affiliation with the storage container comprises one or more of a storage container owned by the one or more selected recipients or a storage container in which the one or more selected recipients collaborate.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the workspace includes multiple storage containers and each of the multiple storage containers has individually configurable predetermined settings.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined settings indicate whether notifications are enabled or disabled for the storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 7. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined settings are configured by the one or more selected recipients prior to the performance of the type of activity in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the criteria is based on predetermined settings associated with a work item upon which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the predetermined settings are configured based on an affiliation with the work item upon which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the affiliation with the work item comprises one or more of a work item owned by the one or more selected recipients or a work item in which the one or more selected recipients collaborate.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the criteria is further based on types of activities, including, one or more of, upload, download, or delete.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the host server comprises a first server and a second server, and wherein said selecting the one or more recipients is performed by the first server and said sending the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients to the corresponding one or more selected recipients is performed by the second server.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the second server includes push technology implemented using one or more of long polls or HTTP streaming.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising electronically displaying the batched notifications to the corresponding one or more selected recipients via an electronic user interface.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the one or more selected recipients is associated with a plurality of queues and the indication of the notification is added to one of the plurality of queues based on the criteria.
  • 16. A system comprising: a processing unit;an interface configured to receive activities occurring in an online cloud-based collaboration environment;a memory unit having instructions stored thereon,wherein the instructions, when executed by the processing unit, cause the processing unit to generate a notification for each of a plurality of activities of the activities occurring in the cloud-based collaboration environment, determine a criteria for selection of one or more recipients based on a type of activity performed in a workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment, select the one or more recipients for the notification based on the criteria, add an indication of the notification for each of the plurality of activities to one or more corresponding queues associated with the one or more selected recipients, and upon triggering of a queue event trigger, send the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients for delivery to the corresponding one or more selected recipients as batched notifications, wherein the queue event trigger is selectively configurable by the corresponding one or more selected recipients to trigger as a result of any of multiple different types of events, and wherein the type of activity includes a preview action that shows a visual preview of a file in the workspace of a the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the criteria is based on predetermined settings associated with a storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the predetermined settings are configured based on an affiliation with the storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the affiliation with the storage container comprises one or more of a storage container owned by the one or more selected recipients or a storage container in which the one or more selected recipients collaborate.
  • 20. The system of claim 17, wherein the workspace includes multiple storage containers and each of the multiple storage containers has individually configurable predetermined settings.
  • 21. The system of claim 17, wherein the predetermined settings indicate whether notifications are enabled or disabled for the storage container within which the type of activity was performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 22. The system of claim 17, wherein the predetermined settings are configured by the one or more selected recipients prior to the performance of the type of activity in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 23. A method comprising: generating, at a host server, a notification event for each of a plurality of activities of activities occurring in a cloud-based collaboration platform;selecting, at the host server, one or more recipients for the notification event based on permissions associated with a workspace and predetermined settings of the workspace within which the plurality of activities is performed in the cloud-based collaboration platform;adding an indication of the notification event for each of the plurality of activities to one or more corresponding queues associated with the one or more selected recipients; andupon triggering of a queue event trigger, sending the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients for delivery to the corresponding one or more selected recipients as batched notifications, wherein the queue event trigger is selectively configurable by the corresponding one or more selected recipients to trigger as a result of any of multiple different types of events, wherein the multiple different types of events include modifying collaborators in the workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, further comprising: selecting, at the host server, the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients based on the workspace and the predetermined settings associated the workspace within which the plurality of activities is performed in the online collaboration environment.
  • 25. The method of claim 23 further comprising: determining, at the host server, a root level for one or more of the plurality of users of the online collaboration environment.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the root level is the level at which a user of the plurality of users is invited into the workspace in which the plurality of activities is performed in the cloud-based collaboration environment.
  • 27. The method of claim 23, wherein the workspace includes multiple storage containers, and wherein each of the multiple storage containers has individually configurable permissions.
  • 28. A system for batching notifications of activities that occur in a cloud-based collaboration environment, the system comprising: means for detecting activities occurring in an cloud-based collaboration platform;means for generating a notification for each of a plurality of activities of the activities occurring in the cloud-based collaboration environment;means for determining a criteria for selection of one or more recipients based on a type of activity performed in a workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment, wherein the type of activity includes a preview action that shows a visual preview of a file in the workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment;means for selecting the one or more recipients for the notification based on the criteria;means for adding an indication of the notification for each of the plurality of activities to one or more corresponding queues associated with the one or more selected recipients; andmeans for sending the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients for delivery to the corresponding one or more selected recipients as batched notifications upon triggering of a queue event trigger, wherein the queue event trigger is selectively configurable by the corresponding one or more selected recipients to trigger as a result of any of multiple different types of events.
  • 29. A non-transitory machine readable storage medium encoded with instructions for performing a method, the instructions comprising: instructions to detect, at a host server activities occurring in an cloud-based collaboration environment;instructions to generate, at the host server, a notification for each of a plurality of activities of the activities occurring in the cloud-based collaboration environment;instructions to determine a criteria for selection of one or more recipients based on a type of activity performed in a workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment, wherein the type of activity includes a preview action that shows a visual preview of a file in the workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment;instructions to select, at the host server, the one or more recipients for the notification based on the criteria;instructions to add an indication of the notification for each of the plurality of activities to one or more corresponding queues associated with the one or more selected recipients, wherein each of the one or more queues is associated with a queue event trigger that is selectively configurable by the corresponding one or more selected recipients to trigger as a result of any of multiple different types of events; andinstructions to, upon triggering of the queue event trigger, sending the contents of the one or more queues associated with the one or more selected recipients for delivery to the corresponding one or more selected recipients as batched notifications.
  • 30. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiple different types of events include modifying collaborators in the workspace of the cloud-based collaboration environment.
US Referenced Citations (532)
Number Name Date Kind
858619 O'Farrell Jul 1907 A
5748735 Ganesan May 1998 A
5787175 Carter Jul 1998 A
5799320 Klug Aug 1998 A
5848415 Guck Dec 1998 A
5864870 Guck Jan 1999 A
5999908 Abelow Dec 1999 A
6016467 Newsted et al. Jan 2000 A
6034621 Kaufman Mar 2000 A
6055543 Christensen et al. Apr 2000 A
6073161 DeBoskey et al. Jun 2000 A
6098078 Gehani et al. Aug 2000 A
6226618 Downs et al. May 2001 B1
6233600 Salas et al. May 2001 B1
6260040 Kauffman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289345 Yasue Sep 2001 B1
6292803 Richardson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6336124 Alam et al. Jan 2002 B1
6342906 Kumar et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345386 Delo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6370543 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B2
6374260 Hoffert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385606 Inohara et al. May 2002 B2
6396593 Laverty et al. May 2002 B1
6441641 Pang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6515681 Knight Feb 2003 B1
6539381 Prasad et al. Mar 2003 B1
6584466 Serbinis et al. Jun 2003 B1
6636872 Heath et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636897 Sherman et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654737 Nunez Nov 2003 B1
6662186 Esquibel et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687878 Eintracht et al. Feb 2004 B1
6714968 Prust Mar 2004 B1
6735623 Prust May 2004 B1
6742181 Koike et al. May 2004 B1
6760721 Chasen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6947162 Rosenberg et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952724 Prust Oct 2005 B2
6996768 Elo et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003667 Slick et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010752 Ly Mar 2006 B2
7020697 Goodman et al. Mar 2006 B1
7039806 Friedman et al. May 2006 B1
7069393 Miyata et al. Jun 2006 B2
7130831 Howard et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133834 Abelow Nov 2006 B1
7143136 Drenan et al. Nov 2006 B1
7149787 Mutalik et al. Dec 2006 B1
7152182 Ji et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155483 Friend et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165107 Pouyoul et al. Jan 2007 B2
7178021 Hanna et al. Feb 2007 B1
7222078 Abelow May 2007 B2
7275244 Charles Bell et al. Sep 2007 B1
7296025 Kung et al. Nov 2007 B2
7346778 Guiter et al. Mar 2008 B1
7353252 Yang et al. Apr 2008 B1
7362868 Madoukh et al. Apr 2008 B2
7363330 Ellman et al. Apr 2008 B1
7370269 Prabhu et al. May 2008 B1
7386535 Kalucha et al. Jun 2008 B1
7401117 Dan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7543000 Castro et al. Jun 2009 B2
7581221 Lai et al. Aug 2009 B2
7620565 Abelow Nov 2009 B2
7647559 Yozell-Epstein et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650367 Arruza Jan 2010 B2
7661088 Burke Feb 2010 B2
7665093 Maybee et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676542 Moser et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698363 Dan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7734600 Wise et al. Jun 2010 B1
7756843 Palmer Jul 2010 B1
7774412 Schnepel Aug 2010 B1
7814426 Huesken et al. Oct 2010 B2
7886287 Davda Feb 2011 B1
7886295 Burger et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890964 Vogler-Ivashchanka et al. Feb 2011 B2
7937663 Parker et al. May 2011 B2
7958353 Matsuzaki et al. Jun 2011 B2
7958453 Taing Jun 2011 B1
7979296 Kruse et al. Jul 2011 B2
7996374 Jones et al. Aug 2011 B1
8027976 Ding et al. Sep 2011 B1
RE42904 Stephens, Jr. Nov 2011 E
8065739 Bruening et al. Nov 2011 B1
8090361 Hagan Jan 2012 B2
8103662 Eagan et al. Jan 2012 B2
8117261 Briere et al. Feb 2012 B2
8140513 Ghods et al. Mar 2012 B2
8151183 Chen et al. Apr 2012 B2
8185830 Saha et al. May 2012 B2
8200582 Zhu Jun 2012 B1
8214747 Yankovich et al. Jul 2012 B1
8230348 Peters et al. Jul 2012 B2
8239918 Cohen Aug 2012 B1
8326814 Ghods et al. Dec 2012 B2
8347276 Schadow Jan 2013 B2
8358701 Chou et al. Jan 2013 B2
8370803 Holler et al. Feb 2013 B1
8429540 Yankovich et al. Apr 2013 B1
8464161 Giles et al. Jun 2013 B2
8515902 Savage Aug 2013 B2
8527549 Cidon Sep 2013 B2
8549066 Donahue et al. Oct 2013 B1
8549511 Seki et al. Oct 2013 B2
8582777 Urivskiy et al. Nov 2013 B2
8583619 Ghods et al. Nov 2013 B2
8607306 Bridge et al. Dec 2013 B1
8650498 Mihovilovic Feb 2014 B1
8719445 Ko May 2014 B2
8825597 Houston et al. Sep 2014 B1
8849955 Prahlad et al. Sep 2014 B2
8868574 Kiang et al. Oct 2014 B2
8892679 Destagnol et al. Nov 2014 B1
8914856 Velummylum et al. Dec 2014 B1
8914900 Smith et al. Dec 2014 B2
8918387 Sokolov Dec 2014 B1
8949939 Peddada Feb 2015 B2
8959579 Barton et al. Feb 2015 B2
8966062 Giese et al. Feb 2015 B1
8990955 Hymel et al. Mar 2015 B2
20010027492 Gupta Oct 2001 A1
20020029218 Bentley et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020091738 Rohrabaugh et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099772 Deshpande et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116544 Barnard et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133509 Johnston et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147770 Tang Oct 2002 A1
20020194177 Sherman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030041095 Konda et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030084306 Abburi et al. May 2003 A1
20030093404 Bader et al. May 2003 A1
20030108052 Inoue et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110264 Whidby et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115326 Verma et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135536 Lyons Jul 2003 A1
20030135565 Estrada Jul 2003 A1
20030154306 Perry Aug 2003 A1
20030204490 Kasriel Oct 2003 A1
20030217171 Von Stuermer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030228015 Futa et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040021686 Barberis Feb 2004 A1
20040088647 Miller et al. May 2004 A1
20040098361 Peng May 2004 A1
20040103147 Flesher et al. May 2004 A1
20040111415 Scardino et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117438 Considine et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122949 Zmudzinski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128359 Horvitz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040177138 Salle et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040181579 Huck et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196307 Zak et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040201604 Kraenzel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218214 Kihara et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230624 Frolund et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040246532 Inada Dec 2004 A1
20040267836 Armangau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050005276 Morgan Jan 2005 A1
20050010860 Weiss et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022229 Gabriel et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028006 Leser et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038997 Kojima et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050228 Perham et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063083 Dart et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050097225 Glatt et al. May 2005 A1
20050102328 Ring et al. May 2005 A1
20050108406 Lee et al. May 2005 A1
20050114305 Haynes et al. May 2005 A1
20050114378 Elien et al. May 2005 A1
20050138118 Banatwala et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050182966 Pham et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198299 Beck et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050198452 Watanabe Sep 2005 A1
20050234864 Shapiro Oct 2005 A1
20050234943 Clarke Oct 2005 A1
20050261933 Magnuson Nov 2005 A1
20060005163 Huesken et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026502 Dutta Feb 2006 A1
20060026535 Hotelling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036568 Moore et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041603 Paterson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041752 Tuvell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047804 Fredricksen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053088 Ali et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053380 Spataro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070083 Brunswig et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075071 Gillette Apr 2006 A1
20060117247 Fite et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060123062 Bobbitt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060133340 Rybak et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060168550 Muller et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060174051 Lordi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060174054 Matsuki Aug 2006 A1
20060179070 George et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179309 Cross et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060242204 Karas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242206 Brezak et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259524 Horton Nov 2006 A1
20060265719 Astl et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271510 Harward et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060288043 Novak et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016680 Burd et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038934 Fellman Feb 2007 A1
20070067349 Jhaveri et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070079242 Jolley et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100830 Beedubail et al. May 2007 A1
20070115845 Hochwarth et al. May 2007 A1
20070118598 Bedi et al. May 2007 A1
20070124460 McMullen et al. May 2007 A1
20070124737 Wensley et al. May 2007 A1
20070124781 Casey et al. May 2007 A1
20070126635 Houri Jun 2007 A1
20070130143 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070130163 Perez et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070162610 Un et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070198609 Black et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208878 Barnes-Leon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070214180 Crawford Sep 2007 A1
20070220016 Estrada et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220590 Rasmussen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070240057 Satterfield et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250762 Mansfield Oct 2007 A1
20070256065 Heishi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266304 Fletcher et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282848 Kiilerich et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283443 McPherson et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288290 Motoyama et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005135 Muthukrishnan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005195 Li Jan 2008 A1
20080016146 Gan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021959 Naghi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028323 Rosen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040173 Aleong et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040503 Kleks et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080046828 Bibliowicz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059656 Saliba et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080063210 Goodman et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065881 Dawson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077631 Petri Mar 2008 A1
20080091763 Devonshire et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080091790 Beck Apr 2008 A1
20080104277 Tian May 2008 A1
20080114720 Smith et al. May 2008 A1
20080133674 Knauerhase et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140732 Wilson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147790 Malaney et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151817 Fitchett et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154873 Redlich et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080182628 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183467 Yuan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080184130 Tien et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080194239 Hagan Aug 2008 A1
20080215883 Fok et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222654 Xu et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243855 Prahlad et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080250333 Reeves et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080250348 Alimpich et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263099 Brady-Kalnay et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080271095 Shafton Oct 2008 A1
20080276158 Lim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294899 Gazzetta et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090015864 Hasegawa Jan 2009 A1
20090019093 Brodersen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090019426 Baeumer et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030710 Levine Jan 2009 A1
20090043848 Kordun Feb 2009 A1
20090044128 Baumgarten et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049131 Lyle et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090119322 Mills et al. May 2009 A1
20090125469 McDonald et al. May 2009 A1
20090132651 Roger et al. May 2009 A1
20090138808 Moromisato et al. May 2009 A1
20090150417 Ghods et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150627 Benhase et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158142 Arthursson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164438 Delacruz Jun 2009 A1
20090171983 Samji et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177754 Brezina et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193107 Srinivasan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193345 Wensley et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198772 Kim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210459 Nair et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214115 Kimura et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090235167 Boyer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235181 Saliba et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235189 Aybes et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090249224 Davis et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254589 Nair et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260060 Smith et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265430 Bechtel et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090271708 Peters et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090276771 Nickolov et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090282212 Peterson Nov 2009 A1
20090282483 Bennett Nov 2009 A1
20090300356 Crandell Dec 2009 A1
20090300527 Malcolm et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327358 Lukiyanov et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327405 Fitzgerald et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327961 De Vorchik et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100011292 Marinkovich et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100011447 Jothimani Jan 2010 A1
20100017262 Iyer et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100017619 Errico Jan 2010 A1
20100036929 Scherpa et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042720 Stienhans et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057560 Skudlark et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057785 Khosravy et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076946 Barker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082634 Leban Apr 2010 A1
20100083136 Komine et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088150 Mazhar et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092126 Kaliszek et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100093310 Gbadegesin et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100107225 Spencer et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100131868 Chawla et al. May 2010 A1
20100151431 Miller Jun 2010 A1
20100153835 Xiong et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100162365 Del Real Jun 2010 A1
20100162374 Nair Jun 2010 A1
20100179940 Gilder et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185463 Noland et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185932 Coffman et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191689 Cortes et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198783 Wang et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198871 Stiegler et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100198944 Ho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205537 Knighton et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100218237 Ferris et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100223378 Wei Sep 2010 A1
20100229085 Nelson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235526 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235539 Carter et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241611 Zuber Sep 2010 A1
20100241972 Spataro et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250120 Waupotitsch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251340 Martin et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100257457 De Goes Oct 2010 A1
20100262582 Garcia-Ascanio et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100267588 Nelson et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274765 Murphy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274772 Samuels Oct 2010 A1
20100281118 Donahue et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290623 Banks et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306379 Ferris Dec 2010 A1
20100318893 Matthews et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322252 Suganthi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325155 Skinner et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325527 Estrada et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325559 Westerinen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325655 Perez Dec 2010 A1
20100332401 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332962 Hammer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100333116 Prahlad et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001763 Murakami Jan 2011 A1
20110016409 Grosz et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022559 Andersen et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022812 van der Linden et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029883 Lussier et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040812 Phillips Feb 2011 A1
20110041083 Gabai et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047413 McGill et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047484 Mount et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110052155 Desmarais et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110054968 Galaviz Mar 2011 A1
20110055299 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110055721 Jain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110061045 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110061046 Phillips Mar 2011 A1
20110065082 Gal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066951 Ward-Karet et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083167 Carpenter et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110093567 Jeon et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099006 Sundararaman et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110107088 Eng et al. May 2011 A1
20110107205 Chow et al. May 2011 A1
20110113320 Neff et al. May 2011 A1
20110119313 Sung et al. May 2011 A1
20110125847 Cocheu et al. May 2011 A1
20110131299 Sardary Jun 2011 A1
20110137991 Russell Jun 2011 A1
20110142410 Ishii Jun 2011 A1
20110145589 Camenisch et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145744 Haynes et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154180 Evanitsky et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161289 Pei et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167125 Achlioptas Jul 2011 A1
20110167353 Grosz et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110167435 Fang Jul 2011 A1
20110185292 Chawla et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110202424 Chun et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202599 Yuan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110208958 Stuedi et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209064 Jorgensen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110213765 Cui et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110219419 Reisman Sep 2011 A1
20110225417 Maharajh et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238458 Purcell et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238621 Agrawal Sep 2011 A1
20110238759 Spataro et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110239135 Spataro et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246294 Robb et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246950 Luna et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252071 Cidon Oct 2011 A1
20110252320 Arrasvuori et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110252339 Lemonik et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110258461 Bates Oct 2011 A1
20110258561 Ladouceur et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110277027 Hayton et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282710 Akkiraju et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110289433 Whalin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110296022 Ferris et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313803 Friend et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320197 Conejero et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036370 Lim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057696 Chew Mar 2012 A1
20120064879 Panei Mar 2012 A1
20120072436 Pierre et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120079095 Evans et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120089659 Halevi et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120092055 Peschke et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120096521 Peddada Apr 2012 A1
20120110005 Kuo et al. May 2012 A1
20120110436 Adler, III et al. May 2012 A1
20120110443 Lemonik et al. May 2012 A1
20120117626 Yates et al. May 2012 A1
20120124306 Abercrombie et al. May 2012 A1
20120124547 Halbedel May 2012 A1
20120130900 Tang et al. May 2012 A1
20120134491 Liu May 2012 A1
20120136936 Quintuna May 2012 A1
20120144283 Hill et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150888 Hyatt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120151551 Readshaw et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158908 Luna et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159178 Lin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120159310 Chang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120166516 Simmons et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120173612 Vegesna-Venkata et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120173625 Berger Jul 2012 A1
20120179981 Whalin et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185355 Kilroy Jul 2012 A1
20120185913 Martinez et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192055 Antebi et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120192086 Ghods et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203670 Piersol Aug 2012 A1
20120203908 Beaty et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120204032 Wilkins et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120214444 McBride et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218885 Abel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221789 Felter Aug 2012 A1
20120224691 Purohit Sep 2012 A1
20120226767 Luna et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233155 Gallmeier et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120233205 McDermott Sep 2012 A1
20120233543 Vagell et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240061 Hillenius et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120240183 Sinha Sep 2012 A1
20120257249 Natarajan Oct 2012 A1
20120259964 Lin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120266203 Elhadad et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120284290 Keebler et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284638 Cutler et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120284664 Zhao Nov 2012 A1
20120291011 Quine Nov 2012 A1
20120296790 Robb Nov 2012 A1
20120309540 Holme et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120311157 Erickson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317239 Mulder et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120317487 Lieb et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328259 Seibert, Jr. et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120331177 Jensen Dec 2012 A1
20120331441 Adamson Dec 2012 A1
20130007245 Malik et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007471 Grab et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130007894 Dang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013560 Goldberg et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130014023 Lee et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130042106 Persaud et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130055127 Saito et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067232 Cheung et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130073403 Tuchman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080919 Kiang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130110565 Means, Jr. et al. May 2013 A1
20130117337 Dunham May 2013 A1
20130117376 Filman et al. May 2013 A1
20130124638 Barreto et al. May 2013 A1
20130124984 Kuspa May 2013 A1
20130138608 Smith May 2013 A1
20130138615 Gupta et al. May 2013 A1
20130159411 Bowen Jun 2013 A1
20130163289 Kim et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130167253 Seleznev et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130185347 Romano Jul 2013 A1
20130185558 Seibert et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130191339 Haden et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130198600 Lockhart et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212067 Piasecki et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130212486 Joshi et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218978 Weinstein et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130239049 Perrodin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130246901 Massand Sep 2013 A1
20130246932 Zaveri et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130262210 Savage et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262862 Hartley Oct 2013 A1
20130268480 Dorman Oct 2013 A1
20130268491 Chung et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275398 Dorman et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275429 York et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130275509 Micucci et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130282830 Besen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130305039 Gauda Nov 2013 A1
20130326344 Masselle et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140007205 Oikonomou Jan 2014 A1
20140013112 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019497 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019498 Cidon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032489 Hebbar et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032616 Nack Jan 2014 A1
20140033277 Xiao et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140033291 Liu Jan 2014 A1
20140052939 Tseng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059217 Pizurica Feb 2014 A1
20140068589 Barak Mar 2014 A1
20140074629 Rathod Mar 2014 A1
20140150023 Gudorf et al. May 2014 A1
20140156373 Roberts et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172595 Beddow et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140344456 Buzbee et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140359286 Wen et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150019723 Kweon et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
2724521 Nov 2009 CA
101997924 Mar 2011 CN
102264063 Nov 2011 CN
0348614 Jan 1990 EP
0921661 Jun 1999 EP
1349088 Oct 2003 EP
1528746 May 2005 EP
1933242 Jun 2008 EP
2372574 Oct 2011 EP
2610776 Jul 2013 EP
2453924 Apr 2009 GB
2471282 Dec 2010 GB
09-101937 Apr 1997 JP
11-025059 Jan 1999 JP
2003273912 Sep 2003 JP
2004310272 Nov 2004 JP
09-269925 Oct 2007 JP
2006250944 Oct 2008 JP
20020017444 Mar 2002 KR
20040028036 Apr 2004 KR
20050017674 Feb 2005 KR
20060070306 Jun 2006 KR
20060114871 Nov 2006 KR
20070043353 Apr 2007 KR
20070043353 Apr 2007 KR
20070100477 Oct 2007 KR
20100118836 Nov 2010 KR
20110074096 Jun 2011 KR
20110076831 Jul 2011 KR
WO-0007104 Feb 2000 WO
WO-0219128 Mar 2002 WO
WO-2004097681 Nov 2004 WO
WO-2006028850 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2007024438 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007035637 Mar 2007 WO
WO-2007113573 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2008011142 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2008076520 Jun 2008 WO
WO-2011109416 Sep 2011 WO
WO-2012167272 Dec 2012 WO
WO-2013009328 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013013217 Jan 2013 WO
WO-2013041763 Mar 2013 WO
WO-2013166520 Nov 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (116)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012973 dated Apr. 30, 2009, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/039126 mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 1-13.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/041308 Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, pp. 1-16.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/056472 mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, pp. 1-12.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060875 Mailed Oct. 30, 2012, pp. 1-10.
Langfeld L. et al., “Microsoft SharePoint 2003 Unleashed,” Chapters 11 and 15, Jun. 2004, pp. 403-404, 557-561, 578-581.
Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2011/041308 dated Feb. 27, 2012, pp. 1- 2.
Supplementary European Search Report European Application No. EP 08 85 8563 dated Jun. 20, 2011 pp. 1-5.
“Understanding Metadata,” National Information Standards Organization, NISO Press, 2004, 20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/056955, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 1-11.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/047530, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/065617, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067126, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/063041, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/057938, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
Parr, “Google Docs Improves Commenting, Adds E-mail Notifications,” Apr. 16, 2011, mashable.com, pp. 1-6.
“Microsoft Office SharePoint 2007 User Guide,” Feb. 16, 2010, pp. 1-48.
Lars, “35 Very Useful Online Tools for Improving your project Management and Team Collaboration,” Apr. 31, 2010, tripwiremagazine.com, pp. 1-32.
“Average Conversion Time for a D60 RAW file?” http://www.dpreview.com, Jul. 22, 2002, 4 pages.
Burns, “Developing Secure Mobile Applications for Android,” Oct. 2008, Version 1.0, 1-28 pages.
Comes, “MediaXchange User's Manual,” Version 1.15.15, Feb. 1, 2009, pp. 1-90.
Exam Report for GB1308842.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 10, 2014, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312264.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1314771.5, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages.
Search Report for EP 11729851.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 7, 2014, 9 pages.
Search Report for EP14153783.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Mar. 24, 2014, 7 page.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/070366, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Mar. 24, 2013, 10 pages.
“How-to Geek, How to Sync Specific Folders With Dropbox,” downloaded from the internet http://www.howtogeek.com, Apr. 23, 2013, 5 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020267, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 7, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034662, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed May 31, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1306011.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 18, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1300188.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 31, 2013, 8 pages.
“Conceptboard”, One-Step Solution for Online Collaboration, retrieved from websites http://conceptboard.com and https://www.youtube.com/user/ConceptboardApp?feature=watch, printed on Jun. 13, 2013, 9 pages.
Exam Report for EP13158415.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jun. 4, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/029520, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/023889, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 24, 2013, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/035404, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jun. 26, 2013, 13 pages.
“PaperPort Professional 14,” PC Mag. Com review, published Feb. 2012, Ziff Davis, Inc., 8 pages.
“PaperPort,” Wikipedia article (old revision), published May 19, 2012, Wikipedia Foundation, 2 pages.
“Quickoffice Enhances Android Mobile office Application for Improved Productivity on latest Smartphone and Table Devices,” QuickOffice Press Release, Nov. 21, 2011, QuickOffice Inc., 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1310666.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316532.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 31, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316533.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 8, 2013, 9 pages.
Gedymin, “Cloud computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Master Final Project, Sep. 2011, 146 pages.
Google Docs, http://web.Archive.org/web/20100413105758/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google—docs, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/039782, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 28, 2013, 15 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 19 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317600.3, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 8 pages.
Exam Report for EP13168784.0, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 21, 2013, 7 pages.
“Revolving sync conflicts; frequently asked questions,” Microsoft Tech Support, Jul. 16, 2012, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web, 2 pages.
“Troubleshoot sync problems,” Microsoft Tech Support: May 2, 2012, retrieved from the internet, http://web. Archive.org/web, 3 pages.
“Tulsa TechFest 2012—Agenda,” retrieved from the website, http://web.archive.org, Oct. 2, 2012, 2 pages.
Cohen, “Debating the Definition of Cloud Computing Platforms,” retrieved from the internet, http://forbes.com, Feb. 3, 2014, 7 pages.
Delendik, “Evolving with Web Standards—The Story of PDF.JS,” retrieved from the internet, http://people.mozilla.org, Oct. 12, 2012, 36 pages.
Delendik, “My PDf.js talk slides from Tulsa TechFest,” retrieved from the internet, http://twitter.com, Oct. 12, 2012, 2 pages.
Duffy, “The Best File-Syncing Services,” pcmag.com, retrieved from the internet: http://www.pcmag.com, Sep. 28, 2012, 7 pages.
Exam Report for EP13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 26, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318792.7, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 22, 2014, 2 pages.
Partial Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 5 pages.
Pyle et al., “How to enable Event logging for Offline Files (Client Side Caching) in Windows Vista,” Feb. 18, 2009, retrieved from the internet: http://blogs.technet.com, 3 pages.
Rao, “Box Acquires Crocodoc to Add HTML5 Document Converter and Sleek Content Viewing Experience to Cloud Storage Platform,” retrieved from the internet, http://techcrunch.com, May 9, 2013, 8 pages.
Search Report for EP13187217.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, 8 pages.
Tulloch et al., “Windows Vista Resource Kit,” Apr. 8, 2007, Microsoft Press, XP055113067, 6 pages.
Walker, “PDF.js project meeting notes,” retrieved from the internet, http://groups.google.com, May 15, 2014, 1 page.
John et al., “Always Sync Support Forums—View topic—Allway sync funny behavior,” Allway Sync Support Forum at http://sync-center.com, Mar. 28, 2011, XP055109680, 2 pages.
Search Report for EP14151588.2, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Apr. 15, 2014, 12 pages.
Exam Report for EP13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 28, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 12, 2013, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 11 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316971.9, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318373.6, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 4 pages.
Exam Report for GB1320902.8, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Dec. 20, 2013, 4 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/034765, Applicant: Box, Inc., Mailed Jan. 20, 2014, 15 pages.
Patent Court Document of Approved Judgment for GB0602349.3 and GB0623571.7; Mar. 3, 2009, 17 pages.
Internet Forums, http://web.archive.org/web/20100528195550/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet—forums, Wikipedia, May 30, 2010, pp. 1-20.
Yahoo! Groups, http://web.archive.org/web/20090320101529/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!—Groups, Wikipedia, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6.
Wiki, http://web.archive.org/web/20100213004936/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki, Feb. 13, 2010, pp. 1-16.
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 24 pages.
Cisco, “FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example,” DocWiki, Jun. 2011, 7 pages.
Palmer, “Load Balancing FTP Servers,” BlogNav, Oct. 2008, 2 pages.
Wayback, “Wayback machine,” Wayback, Jun. 1, 2011, 1 page.
Exam Report for GB1410569.6 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jul. 11, 2014, 9 pages.
Sommerer, “Presentable Document Format: Improved On-demand PDF to HTML Conversion,” retrieved from the internet, http://research.microsoft.com, Nov. 2004, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316682.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312095.1 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1313559.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 4, 2014, 2 pages.
User's Guide for SMART Board Software for Windows, published Dec. 2004, 90 pages.
Zambonini et al., “Automated Measuring of Interaction with User Interfaces,” Published as WO2007113573 Oct. 2007, 19 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 19, 2015, 6 pages.
“Agilewords—How to Request Approval,” YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3- Ov3DYNN3Q, Jan. 31, 2011, 2 pages.
“Agilewords—Features, Powerful Features Yet Simple,” Jun. 1, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20110601223756/http://agilewords.com/product/features, 3 pages.
Conner, “Google Apps: The Missing Manual,” published by O'Reilly Media, May 27, 2008, 42 pages.
Exam Report for EP 13177108.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312264.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Jan. 30, 2015, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 10, 2015, 7 pages.
Exam Report for GB1316685.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 17, 2015, 5 pages.
Exam Report for EP 13185269.1, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Feb. 13, 2015, 8 pages.
Burney, “How to Move Document from Your Computer to Your iPad and Back Again,” May 31, 2011, 3 pages.
“Dropbox: Sync only specific folders,” posted on Feb. 9, 2012, available online at http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/20865/dropbox-sync-only-specific-folders/, 4 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP131832800, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 25, 2014, 7 pages.
Extended Search Report for EP141509422, Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Aug. 26, 2014, 12pages.
Search Report for EP 13189144.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 1, 2014, 9 pages.
Exam Report for GB1312874.9 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415126.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 2, 2014, 8 pages.
Exam Report for GB1415314.2 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1309209.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 7, 2014, 3 pages.
Exam Report for GB1315232.7 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 9, 2014, 5 pages.
Exam Report for GB1318789.3 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 6 pages.
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Product Documentation: How Inheritance Affects File and Folder Permissions, Apr. 11, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1317393.5 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 6 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311417.8 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 2 pages.
Exam Report for GB1311421.0 Applicant: Box, Inc. Mailed Nov. 7, 2014, 4 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140082093 A1 Mar 2014 US