The present invention relates generally to electric vehicles and, more particularly, to batteries and battery management of batteries for an electric vehicle.
Electric vehicles use electric motors that are operated by converted electrical energy output from a battery pack. These electric vehicles use battery packs that have a plurality of rechargeable battery cells (formed into a pack or module) as a main power source. A voltage of tens of volts to several hundred volts is typically used in powering a secondary or main propulsion motor in an electric vehicle. However, individual battery units/cells provide a relatively low nominal DC voltage (for example, for a Lithium ion battery, a cell voltage in the 3 volt to 4.2 volt range is typical; a lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) battery cell can have around 3.7 volts across its output terminals and a LiFePO4 cell can have a nominal voltage around 3.2 V). Thus, a plurality of such individual cells needs be connected electrically in series or a series-parallel configuration to provide a high enough voltage and/or power density to meet the needs of the likes of the main propulsion motor in an electrically-powered vehicle.
In such a battery-powered electric vehicle, the performance of the battery cells/battery pack directly influences the performance of the vehicle. Therefore, a battery management system (BMS) that efficiently manages the charge and discharge of the battery or batteries, such as by measuring the battery cell voltages and/or current, is provided, such as are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,344,694; 8,315,828; 8,307,223; 8,299,757; 8,273,474; 8,264,201; 8,232,886; 8,174,240; 8,164,305; 8,134,340; 8,134,338; 8,111,071; 8,060,322; 8,054,034; and/or 8,004,249, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. A battery management system or electric vehicle may include a thermal management system for the batteries, such as by utilizing aspects of the systems described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/051673, filed Sep. 15, 2011 and published Mar. 29, 2012 as International Publication No. WO 2012/040022, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention provides a battery management system for a vehicle having an electrically powered motor that is powered by a battery unit or module having a plurality of individual batteries arranged in a series configuration or series-parallel configuration. The battery management system includes or is associated with an electrical system for providing voltage and current from an energy source, such as a plurality of batteries, to excite an electrical motor. The battery management system includes a control or circuitry or failure mitigation strategy that is operable to at least one of (a) force cell sense line fuses of the electrical system to be the weakest link in the electrical system only during a failure event to effectively disconnect the energy source or batteries from the battery management system, (b) forcibly disconnect the energy source or batteries from the battery management system in applications where the electrical system does not include fuses for each cell voltage sense line, (c) separate the driving of balancing resistors into two stages, with the first stage comprising cell balancing control and the second stage comprising cell balancing with reverse voltage protection and (d) provide single stage reverse voltage protection to effectively eliminate an electrical conduction path through a low impedance balancing circuit.
These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
For a battery system of an electric vehicle or the like, the likes of charge/discharge levels, diagnostics, thermal management, short-circuit protection and over-temperature protection is provided by a battery management system (BMS). Thus, in an electric vehicle, a battery pack (sometimes referred to as a battery module) includes a plurality of secondary batteries (each sometimes referred to as unit battery) electrically coupled in a series configuration or a series-parallel configuration. In the likes of a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), several to tens of unit batteries are alternately recharged and discharged. It is desirable that the charge/discharge operation of the battery module be controlled so as to maintain the battery module in an appropriate operational mode.
For example, when the battery pack/module is charged and used, the respective unit batteries forming the battery pack/module are repeatedly charged and discharged, during which energy levels of the respective unit batteries may become different from each other.
When a plurality of unit batteries electrically coupled in series or series-parallel configuration are recharged after they are once discharged (i.e., used) to different energy levels, the energy levels of the recharged unit batteries may also be different from each other. In such a case, when the charge and discharge operations are repeatedly performed, some of the unit batteries forming a group may be over-discharged so that the output potentials vary widely between all of the cells, thus causing an undesired imbalance within the battery pack. When a user continuously uses the over-discharged unit batteries and discharges them, a battery cell may be damaged, mechanically breaking down the internal components, and thus creating an instability or a reduced performance of the battery pack.
Thus, when unit batteries having different respective energy levels are electrically coupled in a group and charged, the unit batteries having higher energy levels indicate a charge completion to a charger before the unit batteries having lower energy levels are fully charged, and the charger consequentially may prematurely finish the charge operation. In addition, when the battery pack/module includes the over-discharged unit battery sets, the unit batteries other than the over-discharged unit battery may be over-charged before the over-discharged unit battery set is fully charged. That is, the incomplete charge and over-discharge operations may be repeatedly performed in some of the plurality of unit batteries, and the complete charge or over-charge and incomplete discharge operations are repeatedly performed on the others of the plurality of unit batteries, and therefore the unit batteries may be damaged.
Therefore, to reduce damage of the unit batteries, a known secondary battery pack/module includes a BMS for managing states of the respective unit batteries and a switch (such as a relay, contactor, or other solid state switch device or the like) for controlling current transmission when the battery pack/module is in a faulted state or when energy transfer is not needed. The BMS detects voltages of the respective unit batteries in the battery pack/module. The BMS controls the relay to perform a cut-off operation when the detected voltage of the unit battery is higher or lower than a cut-off voltage. If there is a hazardous condition occurring or imminent, the BMS may cut off the current of the battery pack/module and recover the unit battery.
The present invention protects the batteries and battery management system of an electric vehicle from weaknesses that are typical in currently known battery management systems. Lithium Ion batteries have a significant amount of safety related controversy following them in the vehicle industry. The search for an alternative energy has been a significant focus with the increase in society's environmental consciousness and also with the impacts of the theory of peak oil and the public's transportation costs associated with this phenomenon. With this comes safety concerns and how the vehicle monitors and controls different states of an alternative energy, such as Lithium based energy, to make it a useful and safe alternative for the public.
Typically, battery management systems utilize an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit) with high impedance voltage sense analog monitoring circuits for cell voltage monitoring (typically monitors 4-12 cells per ASIC) and additional analog inputs for temperature sensing. In addition to the two functions of the safety monitoring of voltages and temperatures, the battery management system also employs a strategy to maintain cell voltage balance within a battery pack between the unit batteries. The balancing circuit is typically a switched low impedance circuit, which is utilized to bleed off charge from the highest potential cells in order to ensure that cell voltages in a battery pack are relatively equal to the voltage potential of the lowest voltage cell in the battery pack, essentially balancing the battery pack. This method is known to the industry as “passive balancing.” The switched circuit is a parallel circuit to the voltage sense circuit and typically shares the same electronic path to dissipate battery cell charge as well as measure the cell voltage potential.
There is another method of balancing that is known to the industry as “active balancing,” where charge is shuttled between cells, hence charging the lower voltage cells and discharging higher voltage cells. The lowest cell voltage is no longer the target cell voltage potential for the entire battery pack when active balancing is employed. For the purpose of simplicity, the discussion below focuses on passive balancing. However, it is envisioned that aspects of the present invention may also apply to an active balancing architecture.
There are a number of electronic switching concepts which may be employed to switch the passive balance impedances in parallel to the battery cell. A summary of different switch concepts and what is actually feasibly controllable to employ in a design is described.
Bidirectional Conducting Bidirectional Blocking—Ideal Switch
Forward Conducting Reverse Blocking—Diode
Forward Conducting Forward Blocking—Bipolar junction Transistor (BJT)
Forward Conducting Bidirectional Blocking—Gate Turn Off Thyristor (GTO)
Bidirectional Conducting Forward Blocking—Field Effect Transistor (FET)
The Ideal Switch is the ideal method of controlling the dissipation of a cell for balancing. There is full control over the current flow and it can be blocked in either direction. Ideal is typically not an option, as there are semiconductors in use and the properties may vary as shown above.
The most feasible and cost effective options are controllable switches employed in present designs are BJTs and FETs. FETs are utilized internal to ASICs due to the low Rds_on and the less heat dissipation (higher efficiency). BJTs are utilized normally if the balancing current requirement is too large for the ASIC to handle. The downfall of a FET is when it becomes reverse biased it may conduct in the reverse direction due to the intrinsic body diode, and when the balancing circuit is in parallel to the high impedance input of the voltage sense, the lowest impedance conduction path is through the balancing impedances.
The failure mode which is typical with known or employed battery pack technology is a damaged cell which has a high impedance property (or open circuit), a battery bus bar or weld failure between two series connected cells or an incorrect wire harness configuration, all of which will result in a reverse voltage seen by the BCECU. When any of these failure scenarios occurs and there is a load on the battery pack, the main current path is considered open and the lowest impedance path is now the battery management ASIC and associated circuitry. The other side effect is that there becomes a reverse full pack voltage less one cell potential across the two cell sense lines which are adjacent to the failure. This high reverse voltage forward biases the FET's intrinsic body diode and creates a conduction path through the balancing FET and its associated low impedance balance circuitry.
The cell sense voltage potential below the failed cell or bus bar is always a significantly higher potential than the cell sense voltage potentials above the point of failure and, therefore, any diode paths which are normally reverse biased are now forward biased leading to more unexpected conduction paths. Depending on the design of the ASIC and associated circuitry, there may be more reverse conduction sneak paths due to the reverse voltages the ASIC is experiencing during a failure, thus leading to a catastrophic failure event which at a minimum may lead to the balance resistors and the ASIC to rise significantly in temperature which may lead to carbonization of the PCB and a thermal runaway of the product.
Due to the physics of the failure and the battery monitoring design, the worst case event may be a fire and this circles back to safety mitigation methods and the recent controversies concerning the known Lithium based energy storage technologies which are out in the public realm.
One safety mitigation technique that may be employed by the vehicle manufacturers is cell voltage sense line fusing. The sole purpose of the fuses is to disconnect the energy source and prevent further damage or uncontrolled chain reactions. This mitigation works only when the fuse is the weakest link in the system, but in all reality, the known fuses can handle more current for longer durations than some of the components in the balancing circuit. This technique is also a careful balance between design related to inrush current management and a fusing strategy. When selecting fuses, they are typically selected to give significant design margin to prevent false open circuits during the battery pack operational life, during initial assembly and service assembly (to handle inrush currents upon connection).
The present invention provides a system or systems that will significantly decrease the severity of a failure modes open circuit battery cell, incorrect wiring harness or broken battery bus bar weld. One aspect of the present invention addresses forcibly blowing the fuses if the system is equipped with cell sense line fuses. The present invention uniquely uses the basic switch theory described above as well as shown in
Referring now to
The design configuration shown in
In the event that the cell V1 or cell V12 experiences the failure mode, the result will be unique such that lowest fuse or the most upper fuse will need to be a broken or blown open circuit in order to stop the chain reaction. Breaking these fuses eliminates the differential voltages between all cells and the broken cell. In a scenario such as this, it is acceptable that only one fuse become open to remove the energy potential.
The invention shown in
The invention in
Initial testing has begun on the design described in
The preliminary results with the design concept described in
As discussed above, current known designs typically have an IC (integrated circuit) or ASIC (application specific integrated circuit) to directly turn on or off the Battery Cell Voltage Balancing Resistors, such as shown in
The issue is that most resistors would stay as resistor under power as much as twenty times of rated power of the resistor. For example, a half Watt rated 1210 resistor would most likely stay as a resistor for a relatively long time (such as tens of seconds to minutes or longer) at about 7 Watts. When there are many resistors concentrated in a small area of a circuit board with excessive power, the resistors can reach very high temperature for extended time. This high temperature may be sufficient to cause significant thermal event leading to a fire on the PCB. The melted metals (such as solder of the resistor pads) can randomly move around creating unpredictable short circuits which can cause secondary random thermal events.
The present invention provides a system that may significantly reduce the failure mode severity of a BCECU module under open battery cell condition.
As shown in
In this approach, the cell balancing control no long requires high current (power) capability during normal operation. This makes it possible to use lower power components, such as small surface mount resistors (such as 0603 resistors, for example). Low or lower power components such as 0603 surface mount resistors (or the like) can act as “effective fuses” during an open cell condition. For example, a 0603 surface mount resistor typically will “open” under about 2 Watts power stress in approximately 10 seconds. If the power is higher than 2 Watts, the resistor will open faster. If the power is lower than around 2 Watts, with proper layout to localize the small resistor (to prevent secondary thermal event such as short circuit), the small resistors would have a limited level of local material carbonization (such as board carbonization).
The second stage is the actual cell balancing with reverse voltage protection. The reverse voltage protection stops or limits excessive current and power to the balancing resistors in the event of an open battery cell and is discussed in greater detail below using a concept example. Thus, the thermal stress induced under the approach of the present invention, with careful implementation including layout, should be contained within the BCECU housing.
Therefore, the present invention provides a battery management system that at least one of (a) forces the fuses to be the weakest link in the system only during a failure event and thus safely removes the energy source from the battery management system providing a safe failure state, (b) disconnects or forcibly disconnects the energy source to the battery management system to provide a safe failure state, such as in situations or applications where the system manufacturer does not supply fuses for each cell voltage sense line, (c) separates the driving of balancing resistors into two stages: the first stage comprising cell balancing control and the second stage comprising cell balancing with reverse voltage protection and (d) provides single stage reverse voltage protection, effectively eliminating an electrical conduction path through a low impedance balancing circuit.
Changes and modifications in the specifically described embodiments may be carried out without departing from the principles of the present invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law.
The present application claims the filing benefits of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/803,635, filed Mar. 20, 2013, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61803635 | Mar 2013 | US |