An embodiment relates generally to external device integration within a vehicle.
Determining a state-of-charge (SOC) for a battery can be performed utilizing various techniques utilizing coulomb counting or parameter estimations techniques. Coulomb counting involves the use of one measurement (i.e., battery current) to estimate the battery state-of-charge. The accuracy of the battery current is critical to determining a state-of-charge. If there is measurement error, such as the current sensor not accurate integration error accumulates quickly. Furthermore, the coulomb counting is not carried out during the vehicle ignition off in order to save battery energy, which may bring additional SOC estimation error. Most vehicles utilize low end current and voltage sensors which do not provide accurate results. Therefore, many systems utilize high cost current sensors to monitor SOC all the time to overcome this deficiency.
An advantage of an embodiment is a determination of the state-of-charge (SOC) of a battery utilizing an estimation technique without the use of expensive and high accuracy sensors. The estimation technique utilizes a previous SOC estimation, a present SOC estimation, and a current integration estimation for determining an estimated SOC. The current integration utilizes an ignition-on current integration and an ignition-off current integration determination. The ignition-off integration is determined as a function of a previous open circuit voltage SOC estimation, a present open circuit voltage SOC estimation, and a current integration estimation where the previous and present open circuit voltages are based on open circuit voltage measurements after at least an 8 hour ignition-off period. A comparison is made between the present open circuit voltage SOC measurement and the previous open circuit voltage SOC measurement to determine whether the data from either SOC is skewed by the battery not being at equilibrium. If so, then a next open circuit voltage SOC will be obtained at a next ignition off for generating a next open circuit voltage SOC which may be used to determine the ignition-off current.
An embodiment contemplates a method of determining a state-of-charge of a battery for a vehicle. The vehicle is in a charging state when the engine is operating and a non-charging state when the engine is not operating, the method comprising the steps of: (a) measuring an OCV for a current vehicle ignition startup using a voltmeter, wherein the current vehicle ignition start-up is performed after the vehicle is in the non-charging state for at least eight hours; (b) determining an SOCOCV for the current vehicle ignition startup using the processor; (c) determining an SOCOCV
The vehicle battery 12 is electrically coupled to a plurality of devices 14 which utilize the battery as a power source. The vehicle 10 may further include a voltage meter 16, a current sensor 18, a temperature sensor 19, and a control module 20.
The plurality of devices 14 include, but are not limited to, power outlets adapted to an external device, accessories, components, subsystems, and systems of a vehicle. The current sensor 16 is used to monitor the current leaving the vehicle battery 12. The voltmeter 18 measures a voltage so that an open circuit voltage (OCV) may be determined. The temperature sensor 19 senses the temperature of the battery and can be used as a factor in determining the state-of-charge of the battery. A control module 20, or similar module, obtains, derives, monitors, and/or processes a set of parameters associated with the vehicle battery 12. These parameters may include, without limitation, current, voltage, state-of-charge (SOC), battery capacity, battery internal resistances, battery internal reactance, battery temperature, and power output of the vehicle battery. The control module 20 includes a processor for executing for executing a vehicle state-of-charge (SOC) estimation technique.
The control module 20 utilizes the OCV of the battery for determining the SOC. The SOC may be derived by determining the OCV and then applying OCV mapping or current integration may be applied. To accurately determine the SOC, the OCV may be accurately measured only after the OCV equilibrium is obtained, which occurs a predetermined time after battery charging has been discontinued (i.e., either by an ignition off operation or other charging device). Typically the predetermined time to obtain OCV equilibrium includes 24 hours after charging the battery is discontinued. That is, an open-circuit voltage measurement is accurate only when the battery voltage is under the equilibrium conditions.
Electrical charges on the surface of the battery's plates cause false voltmeter readings. When a battery is charged, the surface of the plates may have a higher charge than the inner portions of the plates. After a period of time after charging has been discontinued, the surface charge on the surface of the plates will become slightly discharged as a result of the charged energy penetrating deeper into the plates. Therefore, the surface charge, if not dissipated to the inner portion of the plates, may make a weak battery appear good. As a result, to obtain an accurate OCV measurement that can be used to determine the SOC, the vehicle typically must be at rest for a long duration of time >8 hours.
Furthermore, for lead acid batteries, the battery transforms the chemical energy into electrical energy as the result of a chemical reaction between the electrolyte solution and the lead of the plates. During the energy conversion and discharge of electrical energy from the battery, the acid reacts with the lead of the plates to build up a sulfate composition. As a load is connected across the terminals, a current flow of electrons is produced to equalize the difference in the charges on the plates. Excess electrons flow from the negative plate to the positive plate. During current flow, the plates can be measured by the poles of the battery to determine the voltage. Stratification of the battery plates occurs if the electrolyte solution is stratified. Since acid is denser than water, the acid build up and layering is greater on bottom of the battery solution than in comparison to the bottom of the battery. The high acid concentration in the lower portion of the battery artificially raises an open circuit voltage and the battery voltage appears to be fully charged and operable, but this is not the case. The amount of current available that the battery can deliver for a defined duration of time while maintaining a terminal-to-terminal voltage when significant stratification is present is very low as opposed a newly produced battery. As a result a false SOC reading may be detected while stratification is present within the battery.
Typical routines assume that open circuit voltage is measured when the battery is in an equilibrium state (i.e., no surface charge and no acid stratification). These typical routines will use the following formula to determine the running state-of-charge which can be represented follows:
where f(VOC(0),T) is the present startup
is the state of charge that is determined by coulomb counting while the charging is occurring. These routines measure the open circuit voltage (OCV) after a long ignition key off such as 8 or 16 hours; however, depending on the charging history, a battery may not reach the equilibrium stage at the 8th or 16th hour. In addition, if the current sensor is not accurate, then integration error accumulates over time with respect to the coulomb counting. Moreover, current measurements during the ignition off are sparse and inaccurate. The following procedure overcomes deficiencies of low cost current sensors, surface charge and acid stratification.
In step 32, a determination is made as to whether SOC0 and SOC1 are in agreement with one another. That is, a determination is made whether the respective SOC values are offset by a predetermined amount, and if so, would indicate that a respective set of values are invalid and that a calculation for an estimated state-of-charge would also be incorrect. If the determination is made that SOC0 and SOC1 are not in agreement with one another, then a return is made to step 30 for determining a state-of-charge at a next ignition cycle. If the determination is made in step 32 that the SOC0 and SOC1 are in agreement with one another, then the routine proceeds to step 33.
In step 33, a determination is made as to whether the ignition off time >8 hours and whether the open circuit voltage SOCOCV is within the error bound. The SOCOCV is the state-of-charge value calculated as a function of the open circuit voltage (OCV) and the battery estimated temperature. The OCV is the battery voltage which is measured before the current ignition cycle (k) but after at least eight hours since the last charging state. After at least eight hours, the battery current is very low (<20 ma), so the battery voltage is the OCV. Therefore, the SOCOCV may be determined from the determined OCV. If the determination is that made that either one of the conditions are not satisfied, then the routine proceeds to step 35; otherwise the routine proceeds to step 34.
In step 34, algorithm 2, as described in detail later, is utilized for updating the ignition time off current Iign
In step 35, the state-of-charge estimation SOCest is updated utilizing the following equation:
where (k) is the number of ignition cycles with at least an eight hour ignition off time before a next cycle is initiated, SOCest(k−1) is the state-of-charge at the k−1 ignition start, Cnorm is the battery normal capacity, ρ is the charge efficiency, Ion is the ignition on-current, Ioff is the ignition off-current, and Δtoff is the ignition off time between (k−1) ignition-on cycle and (k) ignition-on cycle.
In step 36, a determination is made as to whether SOCest confidence is high (e.g., the length of time since the last SOC0 and SOC1 have been used). If the confidence is high, then SOC0 may be utilized again for updating Iign
In step 37, the state-of-charge may be output on a display device of the vehicle for identifying the state-of-charge to the operator. Alternatively, the state-of-charge may be provided to other vehicle systems for use in other vehicle operations where the battery state-of-charge is required for its operation.
In step 41, the ignition cycles are sequentially numbered for determining an estimated open circuit voltage SOCOCV
SOCOCV
where
SOCOCV(k−i) is the OCV based SOC at ignition k−i,
ΔSOC is the integration of ignition−on current from ignition k−i to ignition k.
It should be understood that between the (k−1) and (k) ignition cycle, the engine may crank/start several times but if the ignition off time between two neighbor cranks is less than eight hours, then the OCV is unavailable.
In step 42, a determination is made as to whether difference between the SOCOCV at the kth ignition and the SOCOCV
|SOCOCV(k)−SOCOCV
where ε is the predefined error bound. The following parameters utilized for determining the above inequality is as follows:
If the determination in step 42 is that the difference is less than the predetermined error bound ε, then the routine proceed to step 43, otherwise the routine returns to step 41 for re-estimating an open circuit voltage state-of-charge.
In step 43, the subroutine exits and the SOC values for obtained for SOCOCV and SOCOCV
The following embodiments describe various embodiments for determining the ignition-off current Ioff. If error or noise is not present in any of the measurement data, then a straightforward model may be utilized. The following formula may be used if the error and bias is not present for determining the ignition off current:
where SOC(k) is the state-of-charge at the kth ignition start, SOC(k−1) is the state-of-charge at the k−1 ignition start, Cnorm is the battery, ρ is the charge efficiency, and Δtoff is the time.
Alternatively, if any error is present in the measurement data, then the following embodiments may be used to for determining Ioff. The following model represents a particle filter that may be used if the noise/error is not Gaussian (i.e., normal distribution). The model follows a state space model and the equations that represent the state space model are follows:
the measurement model is represented as follows:
SOCest(k)=SOCOCV(k)+εOCV
where SOCest(k) is the ignition-off current for the current vehicle startup, and SOCOCV(k−1) is the ignition-off current for the previous vehicle startup, and εOCV is the current sensor error of the current sensor
Once the state model and measurement model formulas are defined, the model is applied to determine the Ioff(k) using the following routine as shown in
In step 50, the following particle set is initialized:
{SOCesti,i=1,2, . . . ,N}{Ioffi,i=1,2, . . . ,N}
In step 51, the particles are updated based on the state space model in the equation set forth above. Utilizing the state space model, SOCesti(k) and Ioffi(k) are determined from the particle set. Ion is an ignition-on measurement, SOCesti(k) is calculated utilizing the model.
In step 52, the weights used to compensate for the error/bias at each ignition start. The weights are calculated based on the difference between (k) and SOC(k). The larger the difference, the smaller the weight will be. is represented by the following formula:
where σ is the standard deviation of the {SOCesti}.
In step 53, the particle set is resampled based on the weights. As the particles are resampled for a next iteration, there likelihood will be increased to obtain the particles closer to the true value of SOC(k). The estimation of SOC(k),k+1,k+2 will converge to the true value.
In step 54, an estimated weighted average ignition off current is determined using the following formula:
Ioff(k)=Σiwi(k)Ioffi(k)
SOCest(k)=Σiwi(k)SOCoffi(k)
where wi (k) is the weights for each particle at each respective ignition start, and Ioffi(k) is the measured ignition off current for each particle at each respective ignition start.
In the event that the noise/error is Gaussian which follows a normal distribution, then a Kalman filter may be used. The Kalman filter is utilizes a series of measurements that are observed over time. The measurements contain noise and other inaccuracies. The Kalman filter that operates recursively utilizing streams of noise input data to produce an estimate of the system. The Kalman filter produces estimates of unknown variables and are often more precise than estimates based on a single measurements.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4958127 | Williams et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
8548761 | Lim et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20070145948 | Lim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080053715 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080054850 | Tae et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080150457 | Salman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090157335 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100318252 | Izumi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120091969 | Izumi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20140021959 | Maluf et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140172333 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140210418 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140244225 | Balasingam et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140350877 | Chow et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150112527 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |