Not Applicable
This invention relates generally to the field of directional antennas for transmitting and/or receiving electromagnetic radiation, particularly (but not exclusively) microwave and millimeter wavelength radiation. More specifically, the invention relates to a composite beam-forming antenna comprising an array of antenna elements, wherein the shape of the transmitted or received beam is determined by controllably varying the effective oscillation amplitude of individual antenna elements. In the context of this invention, the term “beam shape” encompasses the beam direction, which is defined as the angular location of the power peak of the transmitted/received beam with respect to at least one given axis, the beamwidth of the power peak, and the side lobe distribution of the beam power curve.
Beam-forming antennas that allow for the transmission and/or reception of a highly directional electromagnetic signal are well-known in the art, as exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 6,750,827; U.S. Pat. No. 6,211,836; U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,124; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,589. These exemplary prior art antennas operate by the evanescent coupling of electromagnetic waves out of an elongate (typically rod-like) dielectric waveguide to a rotating cylinder or drum, and then radiating the coupled electromagnetic energy in directions determined by surface features of the drum. By defining rows of features, wherein the features of each row have a different period, and by rotating the drum around an axis that is parallel to that of the waveguide, the radiation can be directed in a plane over an angular range determined by the different periods. This type of antenna requires a motor and a transmission and control mechanism to rotate the drum in a controllable manner, thereby adding to the weight, size, cost and complexity of the antenna system.
Other approaches to the problem of directing electromagnetic radiation in selected directions include gimbal-mounted parabolic reflectors, which are relatively massive and slow, and phased array antennas, which are very expensive, as they require a plurality of individual antenna elements, each equipped with a costly phase shifter.
There has therefore been a need for a directional beam antenna that can provide effective and precise directional transmission as well as reception, and that is relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture.
Broadly, the present invention is a reconfigurable, directional antenna, operable for both transmission and reception of electromagnetic radiation (particularly microwave and millimeter wavelength radiation), that comprises a transmission line that is electromagnetically coupled to an array of individually controllable antenna elements, each of which is oscillated by the transmitted or received signal with a controllable amplitude.
More specifically, for each beam-forming axis, the antenna elements are arranged in a linear array and are spaced from each other by a distance that is no greater than one-third the wavelength, in the surrounding medium, of the transmitted or received radiation. The oscillation amplitude of each of the individual antenna elements is controlled by an amplitude controlling device that may be a switch, a gain-controlled amplifier, a gain-controlled attenuator, or any functionally equivalent device known in the art. The amplitude controlling devices, in turn, are controlled by a computer that receives as its input the desired beamshape, and that is programmed to operate the amplitude controlling devices in accordance with a set of stored amplitude values derived empirically, by numerical simulations, for a set of desired beamshapes.
As will be more readily appreciated from the detailed description that follows, the present invention provides an antenna that can transmit and/or receive electromagnetic radiation in a beam having a shape and, in particular, a direction that can be controllably selected and varied. Thus, the present invention provides the beam-shaping control of a phased array antenna, but does so by using amplitude controlling devices that are inherently less costly and more stable than the phase shifters employed in phased array antennas.
a is a first exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein α denotes the azimuth angle; and
a is a second exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein a denotes the azimuth angle; and
a is a third exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein α denotes the azimuth angle; and
a is a fourth exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein a denotes the azimuth angle; and
a is a fifth exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein α denotes the azimuth angle; and
a is a sixth exemplary far-field beam shape produced by a beam-forming antenna in accordance with the present invention, wherein α denotes the azimuth angle; and
More specifically,
The amplitude controlling devices 108, 208, 308, of the antennas 100, 200, 300, respectively, may be switches, gain-controlled amplifiers, gain-controlled attenuators, or any suitable, functionally equivalent devices that may suggest themselves to those skilled in the pertinent arts. The electromagnetic signal transmitted and/or received by each antenna element 102, 202, 302 creates an oscillating signal within the antenna element, wherein the amplitude of the oscillating signal is controlled by the amplitude controlling device 108, 208, 308 operatively associated with that antenna element. The operation of the amplitude controlling devices, in turn, is controlled by a suitably programmed computer (not shown), as will be discussed below.
a, 6b through 11a, 11b graphically illustrate exemplary beam shapes produced by an antenna constructed in accordance with the present invention. In general, as mentioned above, the amplitude controlling devices, be they switches, gain-controlled amplifiers, gain-controlled attenuators, or any functionally equivalent device, are controlled by a suitably-programmed computer (not shown). The computer operates each amplitude controlling device to provide a specific signal oscillation amplitude in each antenna element, whereby the oscillation amplitudes that are distributed across the element antenna array produce the desired beam shape (i.e., power peak direction, beam width, and side lobe distribution).
One specific way of providing computer-controlled operation of the amplitude controlling devices is to derive empirically, by numerical simulation, sets of amplitude values for the antenna element array that correspond to the values of the beam shape parameters for each desired beam shape. A look-up table with these sets of amplitude values and beam shape parameter values is then created and stored in the memory of the computer. The computer is programmed to receive an input corresponding to the desired beam shape parameter values, and then to generate input signals that represent these values. The computer then looks up the corresponding set of amplitude values. An output signal (or set of output signals) representing the amplitude values is then fed to the amplitude controlling devices to produce an amplitude distribution along the array that produces the desired beam shape.
A first exemplary beam shape is shown in
A second exemplary beam shape is shown in
A third exemplary beam shape is shown in
A fourth exemplary beam shape is shown in
A fifth exemplary beam shape is shown in
A sixth exemplary beam shape is shown in
From the foregoing description and examples, it will be appreciated that the present invention provides a beam-forming antenna that offers highly-controllable beam-shaping capabilities, wherein all beam shape parameters (angular location of the beam's power peak, the beamwidth of the power peak, and side lobe distribution) can be controlled with essentially the same precision as in phased array antennas, but at significantly reduced manufacturing cost, and with significantly enhanced operational stability.
While exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described herein, including those embodiments encompassed within what is currently contemplated as the best mode of practicing the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the pertinent arts that a number of variations and modifications of the disclosed embodiments may suggest themselves to such skilled practitioners. For example, as noted above, amplitude controlling devices that are functionally equivalent to those specifically described herein may be found to be suitable for practicing the present invention. Furthermore, even within the specifically-enumerated categories of devices, there will be a wide variety of specific types of components that will be suitable. For example, in the category of switches, there is a wide variety of semiconductor switches, optical switches, solid state switches, etc. that may be employed. In addition, a wide variety of transmission lines (e.g., waveguides) and antenna elements (e.g., dipoles) may be employed in the present invention. These and other variations and modifications that may suggest themselves are considered to be within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in that claims that follow.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/201,680, filed Aug. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,456,787 entitled BEAM-FORMING ANTENNA WITH AMPLITUDE-CONTROLLED ANTENNA ELEMENTS, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2286839 | Schelkunoff | Jun 1942 | A |
2415933 | Brown | Feb 1947 | A |
3460145 | Johnson | Aug 1969 | A |
3766559 | Butcher, Jr. et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3780372 | Unz | Dec 1973 | A |
3916417 | Wong et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3990077 | Beaulieu et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4180817 | Sanford | Dec 1979 | A |
4309769 | Taylor, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4559605 | Norsworthy | Dec 1985 | A |
4580141 | Gutleber | Apr 1986 | A |
5003314 | Berkowitz et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5053983 | Hyatt | Oct 1991 | A |
5339086 | DeLuca et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5479177 | Rudish et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5493306 | Rudish et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5543805 | Thaniyavarn | Aug 1996 | A |
5734345 | Chen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751248 | Thaniyavarn | May 1998 | A |
6232920 | Brookner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6466165 | Obayashi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6583760 | Martek et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6900775 | Shapira | May 2005 | B2 |
7034760 | Nakamura | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20020154687 | Bierly et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171583 | Purdy et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030043071 | Lilly et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050057421 | Mohamadi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088337 | Lorenz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070024840 | Fetzer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090167606 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11201680 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 12253790 | US |