The present invention relates to rolling element bearings, and more particularly to cages for rolling element bearings.
A cage maintains the relative spacing of rolling elements between an inner ring and an outer ring of a bearing assembly. The present invention provides a new cage for rolling element bearings. The cage includes first and second side rings interconnected by a plurality of bridges. Some or all of the bridges include a projection formed along the axial length and on the radial inner side or on the radial outer side depending on the bearing. The projections can assist with retention during assembly, handling during installation, and piloting of the cage. The projections cause deformation of the cage as the cage is installed over the inner ring or into the outer ring during assembly.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
The rolling elements 30 in each row are retained in relative position to one another by a cage 34. The illustrated cage 34 has a diameter that is smaller than a diameter defined by the pitch circle P of the rolling elements 30 in order to retain the rollers 30 well below their pitch circle P. In this manner, the number of rolling elements 30 in each row can be increased relative to a similar bearing in which the cage diameter matches or substantially matches the pitch circle diameter. In this regard, the bearing 10 can be considered to be a high-capacity bearing based on an increased number of rolling elements 30.
The projections 50, 50′ project radially inwardly and are sized and configured to create interference between the inner diameter of the cage 34 (as defined by the plurality of projections 50, 50′) and the outer diameter of one of the flanges 54 (see
This interference prevents the installer from simply dropping the cage 34 onto the inner ring 22 in a manner that might potentially damage the cage 34 or the inner ring 22. By having all, most, or some of the bridges 42 include a projection 50, 50′, the bridges 42 will all be spaced slightly from the outer diameter of the flange 54, thereby providing for piloted installation of the cage 34 over the flange 54. Once the projections 50, 50′ clear the flange 54 and are positioned axially over the inner raceway 26, the cage 34 will elastically return to its original, un-deformed state. With the projections 50, 50′ positioned over the inner raceway 26 and axially between the two flanges 54, the cage 34 is retained on the inner ring 22 such that it cannot fall off of the inner ring 22. When handling the assembled inner ring 22 and cage 34, a user need not be concerned with the cage 34 falling off the inner ring 22 onto the floor or work surface. The interference between the projections 50, 50′ and the flanges 54 will retain the cage 34 in both axial directions to prevent unwanted or accidental separation.
The size and shape of the projections 50, 50′ can be varied, depending on the dimensions of the inner ring 22 and the cage 34, to provide the desired interference. In the illustrated embodiment, a maximum interference of 1 mm on diameter is observed. A finite element analysis was performed to confirm that the deformation in the cage 34 caused by the interference between the projections 50, 50′ and the flange 54 would only cause elastic deformation of the cage 34, and that any weld line of the cage 34 would not be compromised. While the illustrated projections 50, 50′ are shown as having a rounded surface or a curvature or a radius in the axial direction, other embodiments may take other forms (e.g., a truncated cone, a truncated pyramid, etc.). In some embodiments, the projections 50, 50′ are designed without any sharp corners or edges to minimize surface damage to the flange 54. Additionally, the projections 50, 50′ are shown as extending across the entire circumferential width of each bridge 42, however other embodiments might have projections that extend less than the entire circumferential width of the bridges 42.
The projections 50, 50′ can be formed by a variety of methods. For example, the cage 34 can be machined from tubular or bar stock, with the projections 50, 50′ formed via material removal around the projections 50, 50′. Alternatively, the cage 34 can be formed by stamping or forging, with the projections 50, 50′ being integrally formed by the stamping or forging die. Alternatively, the projections 50, 50′ could be formed in a secondary step by coining the previously stamped/forged form. In yet another alternative, the cage 34 can be formed using an additive manufacturing process. One option for manufacturing the cage 34 includes drawing a circular cup from flat stock, machining (e.g., by turning) the projections 50, 50′ and optionally some of the cylindrical and/or face surfaces, forming the windows 46 (e.g., by pressing/stamping), and forming the shape of the bridges 42 (e.g., by pressing/stamping). Other known methods can be also used for forming the cage 34 and the projections 50, 50′.
While the invention is shown and described in
With this alternative embodiment, the same benefits described above are obtained, and the same considerations and alternatives regarding the geometry, number, and location of the projections apply equally. For example, the projection or projections 51 could be positioned closely adjacent to one or both of the side rings along the bridge 43 in the manner described above with respect to the projections 50′ (see projections 51′ in
Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/428,591 filed on Dec. 1, 2016, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/051696 | 9/15/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/102003 | 6/7/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2977164 | Witte | Mar 1961 | A |
3482891 | Evangelista et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
4019791 | Loberg | Apr 1977 | A |
4557614 | Knappe | Dec 1985 | A |
5352047 | Ingall et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5882125 | Wahler | Mar 1999 | A |
5964536 | Kinoshita | Oct 1999 | A |
6666585 | Kotzalas et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7670058 | Schorr et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7789570 | Tsujimoto | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8568038 | Lemaitre et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8783966 | Schlegel et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8888373 | Mangold et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8985860 | Honjo | May 2015 | B2 |
9316255 | Yasuda | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20070248297 | Shorr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100129022 | Beyfuss et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20150323008 | Koganei et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160273580 | Kajikawa | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160319868 | Kirchhoff et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170102032 | Heaton | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170227084 | Ditzel et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101813133 | Aug 2010 | CN |
2922361 | Dec 1980 | DE |
9003461 | May 1990 | DE |
1698789 | Sep 2006 | EP |
3104030 | Dec 2016 | EP |
54140047 | Oct 1979 | JP |
2012132508 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2014119059 | Jun 2014 | JP |
2473826 | Jan 2013 | RU |
539175 | Jan 1977 | SU |
2017059850 | Apr 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration for Application No. 2011780060910.0, dated Dec. 19, 2019 (14 pages including English translation). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/051696 dated Nov. 13, 2017 (14 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190226527 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62428591 | Dec 2016 | US |