This disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with subterranean wells and, in an example described below, more particularly provides for bearing contact pressure reduction in well tools.
Bearing failure is a common problem affecting conventional well tools used in conjunction with subterranean wells. Such failures will generally require that the well tools be retrieved for replacement or maintenance, resulting in substantial loss of time and money.
Bearing failures can be due to a variety of factors. However, if the maximum contact pressure between bearing surfaces could be substantially reduced, bearing failures could also be reduced significantly.
The principles of this disclosure are applicable to a wide variety of different types of well tools. Several examples of the kind of well tool which can incorporate the principles of this disclosure to reduce contact pressure between bearing surfaces in the well tool are provided below.
However, it should be clearly understood that the principles of this disclosure are not limited to only the well tool examples described below. Instead, any type of well tool which includes bearing surfaces can benefit from the principles described below.
In the description below, to emphasize the general applicability of the principles of this disclosure to any well tool, the reference number 10 is used to indicate a generic well tool, the reference numbers 12 and 20 are used to indicate generic components of the well tool, and the reference numbers 32 and 44 are used to indicate generic bearing surfaces on those components. The components 12, 20 may rotate, slide or otherwise displace relative to each other. The bearing surfaces 32, 44 may form portions of plain bearings, thrust bearings, hydrodynamic bearings, or any other type of bearing.
One problem with conventional well tool bearing designs is that, at transitions in the bearing surfaces, very high contact pressures can be experienced. These very high contact pressures cause considerable material loss on components due to sliding wear and, in extreme cases, can result in premature failure of the bearing surfaces, thereby reducing or destroying the effectiveness of the well tool 10, requiring replacement of the well tool, and thereby causing loss of time and money in an associated operation. Fortunately, these drawbacks of conventional well tool bearing designs can be minimized or eliminated by employing the principles described in this disclosure.
Representatively illustrated in
Specifically, illustrated in
The modulated bias unit 100 includes a number of hydraulic actuators 102 spaced apart around the periphery of the unit. The hydraulic actuators 102 are used to displace a movable thrust member 104 outward into engagement with a formation surrounding a borehole being drilled.
The thrust member 104 pivots relative to a structural component 12 of the unit 100. In this example, the thrust member 104 is mounted on a component 20 (such as a pivot pin). A cylindrical bearing surface 32 in the component 12 engages a cylindrical bearing surface 44 on the component 20.
Referring additionally to
For various reasons, it may be desirable to widen the diameter of a borehole after it has been drilled. The wellbore reamer as depicted in
Multiple cutting assemblies 106 are supported in a housing assembly 108. Each cutting assembly 106 includes arm components 12 which pivot on pin components 20. The arm components 12 have cutting elements 110 mounted on them.
Another component 12 displaces upward to extend the arm components 12 outward to thereby cause the cutting elements 110 to cut into the wall of the borehole as the drill string rotates. While the cutting assemblies 106 are extended outward and cutting into the wall of the borehole, very high bearing forces are borne by the bearing surfaces 32, 44 on the components 12, 20.
Referring additionally now to
Multiple cutting assemblies 112 are disposed about a housing assembly 116. Each cutting assembly 112 includes a component 20, which comprises a piston on which multiple cutting elements 114 are carried.
A seal 30 on the piston seals the component 20 in the surrounding structural component 12. The wellbore reamer of
When extended outward as depicted in
Referring additionally now to
The component 20 comprises a continuous, hollow, rotating shaft within an outer housing assembly 118. The shaft is supported at three axially spaced apart positions by components 12. The upper component 12 comprises a cantilever bearing 120, the middle component comprises an eccentric cam unit 122, and the lower component comprises a spherical bearing 124.
To change the direction of drilling, the eccentric cam unit 122 is used to displace the middle of the shaft relative to a longitudinal axis 126 of the rotary steerable device. The rotary steerable device depicted in
When the middle of the shaft is laterally offset relative to the axis 126 as shown in
Referring additionally now to
Depicted in
The component 20 rotates with a mandrel 134, which is rotated in response to flow of fluid through the fluid motor. The fluid motor is similar in many respects to that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,163,521.
Referring additionally now to
A motor shaft 136 has magnets 138 mounted thereon, and a pump shaft 140 has magnets 142 connected thereto. The magnets 138, 142 are magnetically coupled to each other, so that torque is transmitted from the motor shaft 136 to the pump shaft 140. A thin-walled shell 144 isolates the motor from well fluids.
The rotating shafts 136, 140 are typically supported at ends of the assembly (and, in some examples, between the ends) by plain bearings. At an intermediate location (shown in an enlarged view in
When used to pump fluids downhole, the bearings can experience very high loads and vibration. The downhole electric motor of
The principles of this disclosure can be used in all of the well tool 10 examples described above. In particular, the principles of this disclosure can be used to reduce contact pressure between bearing surfaces 32, 44 in the above well tool 10 examples, as well as in a variety of other well tools (such as, a roller cone drill bit, etc.).
Referring additionally now to
In the example of
More specifically, the modeling techniques have revealed that, under certain circumstances, contact pressure near a tangent 54 (i.e., the transition between a) contact between the surfaces 32, 44 and b) lack of contact between the surfaces) can be many times the contact pressure away from the tangent. Note that, for clarity of illustration and description, the surfaces 32, 44 are depicted in
An analysis has also revealed that contact pressure on most of (e.g., ˜90% of) the surface area of contact between the surfaces 32, 44 can be much less than (e.g., ˜20% of) the contact pressure at the transition between the surface 32 and the side wall 52. This phenomenon is known as “edge loading” in the art of contact mechanics.
The underlying reason for this circumstance is the concentrated accumulation of strain energy in the structure of the component 12 adjacent the transition between the surface 32 and the side wall 52. If this strain energy could be relieved, the contact pressure at the transition could be reduced, resulting in the contact pressure being more evenly distributed across the area of contact between the surfaces 32, 44.
One technique for relieving the strain energy at the transition in the surface 32 is depicted in
This reduction in stiffness allows the structure 60 to flex somewhat, thereby relieving strain energy. That is, the strain energy in the structure 60 will be reduced relative to what the strain energy in the structure 60 would have been if it had been constructed similar to an adjacent structure 74 of the component 12 which does not have the recess 58 formed therein. Transmission of the forces 56 through the structure 60 will result in much greater deflection of the structure 60, as compared to deflection of the adjacent structure 74 due to transmission of the forces.
The recess 58 may be in the form of a groove, slit, depression, etc. In the example of
In
One curve 62 on the graph represents contact pressure along the component 20 with an unmodified component 12, that is, the component 12 without the recess 58 formed therein to reduce the stiffness of the structure 60. Another curve 64 on the graph represents contact pressure along the component 20 with the component 12 modified as described above to relieve the strain energy in the structure 60.
Note that the maximum contact pressure 66 for the unmodified component 12 is many times greater than the maximum contact pressure 68 for the modified component 12. A contact pressure 70 at the remainder of the bearing surfaces 32, 44 interface for the unmodified design (i.e., adjacent the relatively high stiffness structure 74) appears to be somewhat less than a contact pressure 72 at the remainder of the interface for the modified design, but both of these contact pressures 70, 72 are much less than the maximum contact pressure 66 for the unmodified design.
The maximum contact pressure 68 for the modified design at the transition on the surface 32 is only slightly more than the contact pressures 70, 72 at the remainder of the bearing surfaces 32, 44 interface, and is much less than the maximum contact pressure 66 for the unmodified design. Thus, it is expected that well tools constructed using the principles described in this disclosure will have much greater bearing longevity.
Although the recess 58 is depicted as being used in
If a reduced elastic modulus material 84 is used, in some examples the elastic modulus of the material may vary gradually. Thus, the reduced elastic modulus material 84 may have “gradient” modulus properties. Such a gradient elastic modulus material or functionally gradient material 92 (see
The material 84 can incorporate nano structures 76 therein to provide the reduced elastic modulus of the material. As known to those skilled in the art, a nano structure is a structure having a maximum size of 100 nm. As used herein, the term “nano structure” can encompass nano particles, nano tubes, and any other structures having a size of 100 nm or less.
In
In
The configuration of
The thrust bearing 86 may be used in any of the well tool 10 examples representatively illustrated in
The thrust bearing 86 could utilize any of the techniques described herein for reducing contact pressure between bearing surfaces. For example, nano structures 76, holes 78, voids 80, reduced modulus materials 84, functionally gradient materials 92, multiple materials 160, 162, etc. could be used in the thrust bearing 86, if desired.
The recess 58 is depicted in
Although the principles of this disclosure have been described above as being used to reduce contact pressure at the interface between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 near the tangent 54 (e.g., at a transition between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces), those principles can be applied at other locations in the well tool 10. Other features of the well tool 10 can cause a transition between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces 32, 44.
The above disclosure describes reducing the stiffness of the structure 60 supporting the bearing surface 32 on the component 12. However, the principles of this disclosure can also, or alternatively, be used to reduce the stiffness of structures supporting bearing surface 44 on the component 20. In addition, it is not necessary for the reduction in stiffness to extend completely around the component 20, since maximum contact pressure may be typically experienced on only one side of the component.
Referring additionally now to
Referring additionally now to
Referring additionally now to
In the configurations of
Such a change in stiffness and/or modulus can be accomplished in other ways, in keeping with the principles of this disclosure. In one example depicted in
Referring additionally now to
The bearing sleeve 146 has the recesses 58 formed therein to thereby reduce a stiffness of structures 60 at opposite ends of the bearing sleeve. This reduces the contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 at the opposite ends of the bearing sleeve 146, where a transition occurs between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces.
Note that any of the other techniques described above (such as, use of nano structures 76, holes 78, voids 80, reduced modulus materials 84, functionally gradient materials 92, multiple materials 160, 162, etc.) may also, or alternatively, be used to reduce contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 in the example of
Referring additionally now to
The bearing sleeve 148 has the recesses 58 formed therein to thereby reduce a stiffness of structures 60 at opposite ends of the bearing sleeve. This reduces the contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 at the opposite ends of the bearing sleeve 148, where a transition occurs between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces.
Note that any of the other techniques described above (such as, use of nano structures 76, holes 78, voids 80, reduced modulus materials 84, functionally gradient materials 92, multiple materials 160, 162, etc.) may also, or alternatively, be used to reduce contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 in the example of
Referring additionally now to
The bearing sleeve 130 has the recesses 58 formed therein to thereby reduce a stiffness of structure 60 at a lower end of the bearing sleeve. This reduces the contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 at the lower end of the bearing sleeve 130, where a transition occurs between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces.
Note that any of the other techniques described above (such as, use of nano structures 76, holes 78, voids 80, reduced modulus materials 84, functionally gradient materials 92, multiple materials 160, 162, etc.) may also, or alternatively, be used to reduce contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 in the example of
Referring additionally now to
Each journal bearing 150 includes an inner bearing sleeve 156 and an outer bearing sleeve 158. The recesses 58 are formed on the inner and/or outer bearing sleeves 156, 158 to thereby reduce a stiffness of structures 60 at opposite ends of the bearing sleeve. This reduces the contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 at the ends of the bearing sleeves 156 and/or 158, where a transition occurs between contact and lack of contact between the bearing surfaces.
Note that any of the other techniques described above (such as, use of nano structures 76, holes 78, voids 80, reduced modulus materials 84, functionally gradient materials 92, multiple materials 160, 162, etc.) may also, or alternatively, be used to reduce contact pressure between the bearing surfaces 32, 44 in the example of
It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides several advancements to the art of reducing contact pressures in well tools. The principles of this disclosure result in dramatic reductions in maximum contact pressure between bearing surfaces, and can do so without requiring that any additional components be added to the equipment, and without requiring that extensive redesign be implemented.
The principles of this disclosure can be applied in-situ in a non-intrusive manner in some examples. The resulting structures can also be easily inspected for conformance to specifications.
Due to the reduced maximum contact pressure, a variety of different types of lubricants can be used between the bearing surfaces 32 and 44, 88 and 40, 90 and 42. For example, oil could be used as a lubricant, instead of conventional grease.
The above disclosure provides to the art a method of reducing contact pressure between first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 of a well tool 10. The method can include constructing a structure 60 which supports the first bearing surface 32 in contact with the second bearing surface 44; and reducing contact pressure between the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 by relieving strain energy in the structure 60.
The well tool 10 may comprise a rotary steerable device, a wellbore reamer, a fluid motor, a downhole electrical motor, or any other type of well tool.
The reduced contact pressure may be due to a lack of material supporting the structure 60 in the contacting step. The lack of material may be disposed adjacent a wall 52 of a seal groove 38. The lack of material may be selected from one or more of the group consisting of a recess 58, a hole 78 and a void 80. Constructing the structure 60 may include positioning the structure 60 between the lack of material and the first bearing surface 32.
The reduced contact pressure may be due to a reduced stiffness of the structure 60 and/or a reduced elastic modulus material 84 of the structure.
The structure 60 may comprise a functionally gradient material 92. The structure 60 may comprise a graduated elastic modulus material 92. The structure 60 may comprise nano structures 76 therein. The structure 60 may comprise a first material 160 having a reduced stiffness relative to a second material 162 which supports the first bearing surface 32 in contact with the second bearing surface 44.
A well tool 10 described by the above disclosure may include a first bearing surface 32 which contacts a second bearing surface 44, a transition between contact and lack of contact between the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 and a structure 60 which supports one of the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44. The structure 60 has a reduced stiffness, whereby a contact pressure between the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 is reduced at the transition due to deflection of the structure 60.
The transition may be located at a tangent 54 formed on the first bearing surface 32. The transition may be positioned adjacent a wall 52 of a seal groove 38.
The reduced stiffness of the structure 60 may be due to a lack of material supporting the structure 60. The lack of material may be disposed adjacent a wall 52 of a seal groove 38. The lack of material may be selected from one or more of the group consisting of a recess 58, a hole 78 and a void 80.
The reduced stiffness of the structure 60 may be due to a reduced elastic modulus material 84 of the structure 60.
The deflection of the structure 60 when forces 56 are transmitted between the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 may be increased due to the reduced stiffness of the structure 60.
The structure 60 may comprise a functionally gradient material 92, and preferably, a graduated elastic modulus material 92. The structure 60 may comprise nano structures 76 therein.
The well tool 10 may comprise a rotary steerable device, with the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 being formed on components 12, 20 of the rotary steerable device.
The well tool 10 may comprise a wellbore reamer, with the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 being formed on components 12, 20 of the wellbore reamer.
The well tool 10 may comprise a fluid motor, with the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 being formed on components 12, 20 of the fluid motor.
The well tool 10 may comprise a downhole electrical motor, with the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44 being formed on components 12, 20 of the downhole electrical motor.
The structure 60 may comprise a first material 160 having a reduced stiffness relative to a second material 162 which supports the one of the first and second bearing surfaces 32, 44.
Also described by the above disclosure is a well tool 10 which includes a thrust bearing 86 interposed between components 12, 20 of the well tool 10. A first bearing surface 88 on the thrust bearing 86 contacts a second bearing surface 40 on at least one of the components 12, 20.
There is a transition between contact and lack of contact between the first and second bearing surfaces 88, 40. A structure 60 supports the first bearing surface 88, and the structure 60 has a reduced stiffness, whereby a contact pressure between the first and second bearing surfaces 88, 40 is reduced at the transition.
It is to be understood that the various examples described above may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present disclosure. The embodiments illustrated in the drawings are depicted and described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which are not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to these specific embodiments, and such changes are within the scope of the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3866987 | Garner | Feb 1975 | A |
4889195 | Kruger et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5125754 | Ide | Jun 1992 | A |
5163521 | Pustanyk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5174738 | Baumann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5265964 | Hooper | Nov 1993 | A |
5307887 | Welsh | May 1994 | A |
5472058 | Hooper et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5520255 | Barr et al. | May 1996 | A |
5678829 | Kalsi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6095262 | Chen | Aug 2000 | A |
6109376 | Pearce | Aug 2000 | A |
6213225 | Chen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6360831 | Akesson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401839 | Chen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412577 | Chen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460635 | Kalsi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6581699 | Chen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6863124 | Araux et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7387177 | Zahradnik et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401666 | Fanuel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7434632 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7703982 | Cooley | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7946768 | Cooley et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20060065445 | Chellappa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060171616 | Richie et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090194945 | Bhat et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100226759 | Cooley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110168450 | Sui et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174547 | Sexton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Search Report issued Jun. 23, 2011 for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US11/25430, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion issued Jun. 23, 2011 for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US11/25430, 3 pages. |
Halliburton, Security DBS Drill Bits product brochure, 2005, 2 pages. |
Halliburton, Energy Balanced® Series Roller Cone Bits product brochure, 2005, 1 page. |
Alaskan Energy Resources, Inc., Security DBS Drill Bits product brochure, 2006, 4 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jun. 23, 2011 for PCT/US11/025430, 8 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Aug. 26, 2011 for PCT/US11/025427, 8 pages. |
Specification and Drawings for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US11/62654, filed Nov. 30, 2011, 20 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,807, 16 pages. |
Specification and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,578, filed Oct. 12, 2012, 22 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 12, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,807, 18 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110168407 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |