This disclosure relates to fabrics or belts for a papermaking machine, and in particular to fabrics or belts that include polymeric layers and that are intended for use on papermaking machines for the production of tissue products.
Tissue manufacturers that can deliver the highest quality product at the lowest cost have a competitive advantage in the marketplace. A key component in determining the cost and quality of a tissue product is the manufacturing process utilized to create the product. For tissue products, there are several manufacturing processes available including conventional dry crepe, through air drying (TAD), or “hybrid” technologies such as Valmet's NTT and QRT processes, Georgia Pacific's ETAD, and Voith's ATMOS process. Each has differences as to installed capital cost, raw material utilization, energy cost, production rates, and the ability to generate desired attributes such as softness, strength, and absorbency.
Conventional manufacturing processes include a forming section designed to retain the fiber, chemical, and filler recipe while allowing the water to drain from the web. Many types of forming sections, such as inclined suction breast roll, twin wire C-wrap, twin wire S-wrap, suction forming roll, and Crescent formers, include the use of forming fabrics.
Forming fabrics are woven structures that utilize monofilaments (such as yarns or threads) composed of synthetic polymers (usually polyethylene, polypropylene, or nylon). A forming fabric has two surfaces, the sheet side and the machine or wear side. The wear side is in contact with the elements that support and move the fabric and are thus prone to wear. To increase wear resistance and improve drainage, the wear side of the fabric has larger diameter monofilaments compared to the sheet side. The sheet side has finer yarns to promote fiber and filler retention on the fabric surface.
Different weave patterns are utilized to control other properties such as: fabric stability, life potential, drainage, fiber support, and clean-ability. There are three basic types of forming fabrics: single layer, double layer, and triple layer. A single layer fabric is composed of one yarn system made up of cross direction (CD) yarns (also known as shute yarns) and machine direction (MD) yarns (also known as warp yarns). The main issue for single layer fabrics is a lack of dimensional stability. A double layer forming fabric has one layer of warp yarns and two layers of shute yarns. This multilayer fabric is generally more stable and resistant to stretching. Triple layer fabrics have two separate single layer fabrics bound together by separated yarns called binders. Usually the binder fibers are placed in the cross direction but can also be oriented in the machine direction. Triple layer fabrics have further increased dimensional stability, wear potential, drainage, and fiber support than single or double layer fabrics.
The manufacturing of forming fabrics includes the following operations: weaving, initial heat setting, seaming, final heat setting, and finishing. The fabric is made in a loom using two interlacing sets of monofilaments (or threads or yarns). The longitudinal or machine direction threads are called warp threads and the transverse or machine direction threads are called shute threads. After weaving, the forming fabric is heated to relieve internal stresses to enhance dimensional stability of the fabric. The next step in manufacturing is seaming. This step converts the flat woven fabric into an endless forming fabric by joining the two MD ends of the fabric. After seaming, a final heat setting is applied to stabilize and relieve the stresses in the seam area. The final step in the manufacturing process is finishing, whereby the fabric is cut to width and sealed.
There are several parameters and tools used to characterize the properties of the forming fabric: mesh and count, caliper, frames, plane difference, open area, air permeability, void volume and distribution, running attitude, fiber support, drainage index, and stacking. None of these parameters can be used individually to precisely predict the performance of a forming fabric on a paper machine, but together the expected performance and sheet properties can be estimated. Examples of forming fabrics designs can be viewed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,143,150, 4,184,519, 4,909,284, and 5,806,569.
In a conventional dry crepe process, after web formation and drainage (to around 35% solids) in the forming section (assisted by centripetal force around the forming roll and, in some cases, vacuum boxes), a web is transferred from the forming fabric to a press fabric upon which the web is pressed between a rubber or polyurethane covered suction pressure roll and Yankee dryer. The press fabric is a permeable fabric designed to uptake water from the web as it is pressed in the press section, it is composed of large monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns, needled with fine synthetic batt fibers to form a smooth surface for even web pressing against the Yankee dryer. Removing water via pressing reduces energy consumption.
In a conventional TAD process, rather than pressing and compacting the web, as is performed in conventional dry crepe, the web undergoes the steps of imprinting and thermal pre-drying. Imprinting is a step in the process where the web is transferred from a forming fabric to a structured fabric (or imprinting fabric) and subsequently pulled into the structured fabric using vacuum (referred to as imprinting or molding). This step imprints the weave pattern (or knuckle pattern) of the structured fabric into the web. This imprinting step increases softness of the web, and affects smoothness and the bulk structure. The manufacturing method of an imprinting fabric is similar to a forming fabric (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,473,576, 3,573,164, 3,905,863, 3,974,025, and 4,191,609 for examples) except for an additional step if an overlaid polymer is utilized.
Imprinting fabrics with an overlaid polymer are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,679,222, 4,514,345, 5,334,289, 4,528,239 and 4,637,859. Specifically, these patents disclose a method of forming a fabric in which a patterned resin is applied over a woven substrate. The patterned resin completely penetrates the woven substrate. The top surface of the patterned resin is flat and openings in the resin have sides that follow a linear path as the sides approach and then penetrate the woven structure.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,610,173, 6,660,362, 6,998,017, and European Patent No. EP 1 339 915 disclose another technique for applying an overlaid resin to a woven imprinting fabric.
After imprinting, the web is thermally pre-dried by moving hot air through the web while it is conveyed on the structured fabric. Thermal pre-drying can be used to dry the web to over 90% solids before the web is transferred to a steam heated cylinder. The web is then transferred from the structured fabric to the steam heated cylinder though a very low intensity nip (up to 10 times less than a conventional press nip) between a solid pressure roll and the steam heated cylinder. The portions of the web that are pressed between the pressure roll and steam cylinder rest on knuckles of the structured fabric; thereby protecting most of the web from the light compaction that occurs in this nip. The steam cylinder and an optional air cap system, for impinging hot air, then dry the sheet to up to 99% solids during the drying stage before creping occurs. The creping step of the process again only affects the knuckle sections of the web that are in contact with the steam cylinder surface. Due to only the knuckles of the web being creped, along with the dominant surface topography being generated by the structured fabric, and the higher thickness of the TAD web, the creping process has much smaller effect on overall softness as compared to conventional dry crepe. After creping, the web is optionally calendered and reeled into a parent roll and ready for the converting process. Some TAD machines utilize fabrics (similar to dryer fabrics) to support the sheet from the crepe blade to the reel drum to aid in sheet stability and productivity. Patents which describe creped through air dried products include U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,994,771, 4,102,737, 4,529,480, and 5,510,002.
The TAD process generally has higher capital costs as compared to a conventional tissue machine due to the amount of air handling equipment needed for the TAD section. Also, the TAD process has a higher energy consumption rate due to the need to burn natural gas or other fuels for thermal pre-drying. However, the bulk softness and absorbency of a paper product made from the TAD process is superior to conventional paper due to the superior bulk generation via structured fabrics, which creates a low density, high void volume web that retains its bulk when wetted. The surface smoothness of a TAD web can approach that of a conventional tissue web. The productivity of a TAD machine is less than that of a conventional tissue machine due to the complexity of the process and the difficulty of providing a robust and stable coating package on the Yankee dryer needed for transfer and creping of a delicate a pre-dried web.
UCTAD (un-creped through air drying) is a variation of the TAD process in which the sheet is not creped, but rather dried up to 99% solids using thermal drying, blown off the structured fabric (using air), and then optionally calendered and reeled. U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,551 describes an uncreped through air dried product.
A process/method and paper machine system for producing tissue has been developed by the Voith company and is marketed under the name ATMOS. The process/method and paper machine system has several variations, but all involve the use of a structured fabric in conjunction with a belt press. The major steps of the ATMOS process and its variations are stock preparation, forming, imprinting, pressing (using a belt press), creping, calendering (optional), and reeling the web.
The stock preparation step of the ATMOS process is the same as that of a conventional or TAD machine. The forming process can utilize a twin wire former (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,744,726), a Crescent Former with a suction Forming Roll (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,821,391), or a Crescent Former (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,706). The former is provided with a slurry from the headbox to a nip formed by a structured fabric (inner position/in contact with the forming roll) and forming fabric (outer position). The fibers from the slurry are predominately collected in the valleys (or pockets, pillows) of the structured fabric and the web is dewatered through the forming fabric. This method for forming the web results in a bulk structure and surface topography as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,706 (FIGS. 1-11). After the forming roll, the structured and forming fabrics separate, with the web remaining in contact with the structured fabric.
The web is now transported on the structured fabric to a belt press. The belt press can have multiple configurations. The press dewaters the web while protecting the areas of the sheet within the structured fabric valleys from compaction. Moisture is pressed out of the web, through the dewatering fabric, and into the vacuum roll. The press belt is permeable and allows for air to pass through the belt, web, and dewatering fabric, and into the vacuum roll, thereby enhancing the moisture removal. Since both the belt and dewatering fabric are permeable, a hot air hood can be placed inside of the belt press to further enhance moisture removal. Alternately, the belt press can have a pressing device which includes several press shoes, with individual actuators to control cross direction moisture profile, or a press roll. A common arrangement of the belt press has the web pressed against a permeable dewatering fabric across a vacuum roll by a permeable extended nip belt press. Inside the belt press is a hot air hood that includes a steam shower to enhance moisture removal. The hot air hood apparatus over the belt press can be made more energy efficient by reusing a portion of heated exhaust air from the Yankee air cap or recirculating a portion of the exhaust air from the hot air apparatus itself.
After the belt press, a second press is used to nip the web between the structured fabric and dewatering felt by one hard and one soft roll. The press roll under the dewatering fabric can be supplied with vacuum to further assist water removal. This belt press arrangement is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,382,956 and 8,580,083, with
The sheet is now transferred to a steam heated cylinder via a press element. The press element can be a through drilled (bored) pressure roll, a through drilled (bored) and blind drilled (blind bored) pressure roll, or a shoe press. After the web leaves this press element and before it contacts the steam heated cylinder, the % solids are in the range of 40-50%. The steam heated cylinder is coated with chemistry to aid in sticking the sheet to the cylinder at the press element nip and also to aid in removal of the sheet at the doctor blade. The sheet is dried to up to 99% solids by the steam heated cylinder and an installed hot air impingement hood over the cylinder. This drying process, the coating of the cylinder with chemistry, and the removal of the web with doctoring is explained in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,582,187 and 7,905,989. The doctoring of the sheet off the Yankee, i.e., creping, is similar to that of TAD with only the knuckle sections of the web being creped. Thus, the dominant surface topography is generated by the structured fabric, with the creping process having a much smaller effect on overall softness as compared to conventional dry crepe. The web is now calendered (optional), slit, reeled and ready for the converting process.
The ATMOS process has capital costs between that of a conventional tissue machine and a TAD machine. It uses more fabrics and a more complex drying system compared to a conventional machine, but uses less equipment than a TAD machine. The energy costs are also between that of a conventional and a TAD machine due to the energy efficient hot air hood and belt press. The productivity of the ATMOS machine has been limited due to the inability of the novel belt press and hood to fully dewater the web and poor web transfer to the Yankee dryer, likely driven by poor supported coating packages, the inability of the process to utilize structured fabric release chemistry, and the inability to utilize overlaid fabrics to increase web contact area to the dryer. Poor adhesion of the web to the Yankee dryer has resulted in poor creping and stretch development which contributes to sheet handling issues in the reel section. The result is that the output of an ATMOS machine is currently below that of conventional and TAD machines. The bulk softness and absorbency is superior to conventional, but lower than a TAD web since some compaction of the sheet occurs within the belt press, especially areas of the web not protected within the pockets of the fabric. Also, bulk is limited since there is no speed differential to help drive the web into the structured fabric as exists on a TAD machine. The surface smoothness of an ATMOS web is between that of a TAD web and a conventional web primarily due to the current limitation on use of overlaid structured fabrics.
The ATMOS manufacturing technique is often described as a hybrid technology because it utilizes a structured fabric like the TAD process, but also utilizes energy efficient means to dewater the sheet like the conventional dry crepe process. Other manufacturing techniques which employ the use of a structured fabric along with an energy efficient dewatering process are the ETAD process and NTT process. The ETAD process and products are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,339,378, 7,442,278, and 7,494,563. The NTT process and products are described in WO 2009/061079 A1, US Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0180223 A1, and US Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0065234 A1. The QRT process is described in US Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0156450 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,811,418. A structuring belt manufacturing process used for the NTT, QRT, and ETAD imprinting process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,980,062 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2010/0236034.
The NIT process involves spirally winding strips of polymeric material, such as industrial strapping or ribbon material, and adjoining the sides of the strips of material using ultrasonic, infrared, or laser welding techniques to produce an endless belt. Optionally, a filler or gap material can be placed between the strips of material and melted using the aforementioned welding techniques to join the strips of materials. The strips of polymeric material are produced by an extrusion process from any polymeric resin such as polyester, polyamide, polyurethane, polypropylene, or polyether ether ketone resins. The strip material can also be reinforced by incorporating monofilaments of polymeric material into the strips during the extrusion process or by laminating a layer of woven polymer monofilaments to the non-sheet contacting surface of a finished endless belt composed of welded strip material. The endless belt can have a textured surface produced using processes such as sanding, graving, embossing, or etching. The belt can be impermeable to air and water, or made permeable by processes such as punching, drilling, or laser drilling. Examples of structuring belts used in the NIT process can be viewed in International Publication Number WO 2009/067079 A1 and US Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0065234 A1.
As shown in the aforementioned discussion of tissue papermaking technologies, the fabrics or belts utilized are critical in the development of the tissue web structure and topography which, in turn, are instrumental in determining the quality characteristics of the web such as softness (bulk softness and surfaces smoothness) and absorbency. The manufacturing process for making these fabrics has been limited to weaving a fabric (primarily forming fabrics and structured fabrics) or a base structure and needling synthetic fibers (press fabrics) or overlaying a polymeric resin (overlaid structured fabrics) to the fabric/base structure, or welding strips of polymeric material together to form an endless belt.
Conventional overlaid structures require application of an uncured polymer resin over a woven substrate where the resin completely penetrates through the thickness of the woven stricture. Certain areas of the resin are cured and other areas are uncured and washed away from the woven structure. This results is a fabric where airflow through the fabric is only possible in the Z-direction. Thus, in order for the web to dry efficiently, only highly permeable fabrics can be utilized, meaning the amount of overlaid resin applied needs to be limited. If a fabric of low permeability is produced in this manner, then drying efficiency is significantly reduced, resulting in poor energy efficiency and/or low production rates as the web must be transported slowly across the TAD drums or ATMOS drum for sufficient drying. Similarly, a welded polymer structuring layer is extremely planar and provides an even surface when laminating to a woven support layer (
An object of this invention is to provide an alternate process for manufacturing structured fabrics. It is also the purpose of this invention to provide a less complex, lower cost, higher production technique to produce these fabrics. This process can be used to produce structuring fabrics and forming fabrics.
In an exemplary embodiment, the inventive process uses extruded polymeric netting material to create the fabric. The extruded polymer netting is optionally laminated to additional layers of extruded polymer netting, woven polymer monofilament, or woven monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns needled with fine synthetic batt fibers.
Another object of this invention is to provide a press section of a paper machine that can utilize the inventive structuring fabric to produce high quality, high bulk tissue paper. This press section combines the low capital cost, high production rate, low energy consumption advantages of the NTT manufacturing process, but improves the quality to levels that can be achieved with TAD technology.
The inventive process avoids the tedious and expensive conventional prior art process used to produce woven fabrics using a loom or the time, cost, and precision needed to produce welded fabrics using woven strips of polymeric material that need to be engraved, embossed, or laser drilled. The fabrics produced using the inventive process can be utilized as forming fabrics on any papermaking machine or as a structuring belt on tissue machines utilizing the TAD (creped or uncreped), NTT, QRT, ATMOS, ETAD or other hybrid processes.
In an exemplary embodiment, a low porosity structuring belt of the inventive design is used on a TAD machine where the air flows through the TAD drum from a hot air impingement hood or air cap. High air flow through the inventive structuring belt is not required to effectively dry the imprinted sheet, leading to lower heat demand and fuel consumption.
In an exemplary embodiment, a press section of a tissue machine can be used in conjunction with structured fabrics of this invention to produce high quality tissue with low capital and operational costs. This combination of high quality tissue produced at high productivity rates using low capital and operational costs is not currently available using conventional technologies.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a fabric or belt for a papermaking machine comprises: a first layer that defines a web contacting surface, the first layer being made of extruded polymer and comprising: a plurality of first elements aligned in a first direction; a plurality of second elements aligned in a second direction and extending over the plurality of first elements; and a plurality of open portions defined by the plurality of first and second elements; and a second layer made of woven fabric that supports the first layer, wherein the first layer is bonded to the second layer so that the first layer extends only partially through the second layer and an interface formed between the first and second layers comprises airflow channels that extend in a plane parallel to the first and second layers.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the interface between the first and second layers comprises bonded and non-bonded portions.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer extends into the second layer by an amount of 30 μm or less.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer has a thickness of 0.25 mm to 1.7 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer has a thickness of 0.4 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer has a thickness of 0.5 mm to 0.6 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of open portions repeat across the first layer in both machine and cross directions at regular intervals.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of open portions are rectangular-shaped open portions.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the rectangular-shaped open portions are defined by sides with a length of 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the rectangular-shaped open portions are defined by sides with a length of 0.4 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the rectangular-shaped open portions are defined by sides with a length of 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of open portions are square-shaped open portions.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of open portions are circular-shaped open portions.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the diameter of the circular-shaped open portions is 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the diameter of the circular-shaped open portions is 0.4 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the diameter of the circular-shaped open portions is 0.1 mm to 0.7 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend above the plurality of first elements by an amount of 0.05 mm to 0.4 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend above the plurality of first elements by an amount of 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend above the plurality of first elements by an amount of 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements have a width of 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements have a width of 0.2 mm to 0.4 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements have a width of 0.25 mm to 0.3 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a thickness of 0.15 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a thickness of 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a thickness of 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a width of 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a width of 0.3 mm to 0.5 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of first elements have a width of 0.4 mm to 0.5 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer is made of polymer or copolymer.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer is made of an extruded netting tube.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the extruded netting tube is stretched to orient the polymer or copolymer.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer is made of a perforated sheet.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the perforated sheet is stretched to orient the polymer or copolymer.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the perforated sheet is seamed using thermal, laser, infrared or ultraviolet seaming.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer comprises woven polymeric monofilaments.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer comprises woven monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns needled with fine synthetic batt fibers.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a 5 shed weave with a non-numerical warp pick sequence.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a mesh of 10 to 30 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a mesh of 15 to 25 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a mesh of 17 to 22 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a count of 5 to 30 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a count of 10 to 20 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a count of 15 to 20 frames/cm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a caliper of 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a caliper of 0.5 mm to 1.0 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer has a caliper of 0.5 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer is bonded to the first layer by thermal, ultrasonic, ultraviolet or infrared welding.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer is bonded to the first layer with a 20% to 50% contact area.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer is bonded to the first layer with a 20% to 30% contact area.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second layer is bonded to the first layer with a 25% to 30% contact area.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 20 cfm to 300 cfm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 100 cfm to 250 cfm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 200 cfm to 250 cfm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt is a structuring fabric configured for use on a papermaking machine.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the papermaking machine is a Through Air Dried, ATMOS, NTT, QRT or ETAD tissue making machine.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt is a forming fabric configured for use on a papermaking machine.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend below the plurality of first elements.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend below the plurality of first elements by less than 0.40 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend below the plurality of first elements by 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of second elements extend below the plurality of first elements by 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first direction is substantially parallel to a machine cross direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second direction is substantially parallel to a machine direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first direction is substantially parallel to a machine direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the second direction is substantially parallel to a machine cross direction.
A fabric or belt for a papermaking machine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises: a first layer that defines a web contacting surface, the first layer being made of extruded polymer and comprising: a plurality of first elements aligned in a first direction; a plurality of second elements aligned in a second direction and extending over the plurality of first elements; and a plurality of open portions defined by the plurality of first and second elements; and a second layer made of woven fabric that supports the first layer, wherein the first layer is bonded to the second layer so as to form an interface between the first and second layers that comprises bonded and unbonded portions and airflow channels that extend in a plane parallel to the first and second layers.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer extends only partially through the second layer.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the first layer extends into the second layer by an amount of 30 μm or less.
A fabric or belt for a papermaking machine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises: a first layer hat defines a web contacting surface, the first layer comprising a plurality of grooves aligned substantially in the machine direction; and a second layer made of woven fabric that supports the first layer, wherein the first layer is bonded to the second layer so as to form an interface between the first and second layers that comprises bonded and unbonded portions and airflow channels that extend in a plane parallel to the first and second layers.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are angled 0.1% to 45% relative to the machine direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are angled 0.1% to 5% relative to the machine direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are angled 2% to 3% relative to the machine direction.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves have a depth of 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves have a depth of 0.4 mm to 0.75 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves have a depth of 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves have a square, semicircular or tapered cross section.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are spaced 0.1 mm to 1.5 mm apart from each other.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are spaced 0.2 mm to 0.5 mm apart from each other.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are spaced 0.2 mm to 0.3 mm apart from ach other.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the plurality of grooves are formed by laser drilling.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt is subjected to punching, drilling or laser drilling to achieve an air permeability of 20 cfm to 200 cfm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 20 cfm to 100 cfm.
According to at least one exemplary embodiment, the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 10 cfm to 50 cfm.
A fabric or belt for a papermaking machine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises: first layer that defines a web contacting surface, the first layer comprising: a plurality of first elements aligned in a cross direction, the plurality of first elements having a thickness of 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm and a width of 0.4 mm to 0.5 mm; a plurality of second elements aligned in a machine direction and extending over the plurality of first elements by an amount of 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm and having a width of 0.25 mm to 0.3 mm; and a plurality of open portions defined by the plurality of first and second elements and that repeat across the at least one nonwoven layer in both the machine and cross directions at regular intervals, the plurality of open portions being square shaped and defined by sides with a length of 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm; and a woven fabric layer that supports the at least one layer, wherein the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 20 cfm to 300 cfm.
A fabric or belt for a papermaking machine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises: at least one layer that defines a web contacting surface, the at least one layer comprising: a plurality of first elements aligned in a cross direction, the plurality of first elements having a thickness of 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm and a width of 0.4 mm to 0.5 mm; a plurality of second elements aligned in a machine direction and extending over the plurality of first elements by an amount of 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm and having a width of 0.25 mm to 0.3 mm; and a plurality of open portions defined by the plurality of first and second elements and that repeat across the at least one layer in both the machine and cross directions at regular intervals, the plurality of open portions being circular shaped with a diameter of 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm; and a woven fabric layer that supports the at least one layer, wherein the fabric or belt has an air permeability of 20 cfm to 300 cfm.
A method of forming a tissue product according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention comprises: depositing a nascent paper web onto a forming fabric of a papermaking machine so as to form a paper web; at least partially dewatering the paper web through a structuring fabric of a press section of the papermaking machine, wherein the structuring fabric comprises: a first layer that defines a web contacting surface, the first layer being made of extruded polymer and comprising: a plurality of first elements aligned in a first direction; a plurality of second elements aligned in a second direction and extending over the plurality of first elements; and a plurality of open portions defined by the plurality of first and second elements; and a second layer made of woven fabric that supports the first layer, wherein the first layer is bonded to the second layer so that the first layer extends only partially through the second layer and an interface formed between the first and second layers comprise airflow channels that extend in a plane parallel to the first and second layers; and drying the at least partially dewatered paper web at a drying section of the papermaking machine.
The features and advantages of exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be more fully understood with reference to the following, detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein:
Current methods for manufacturing papermaking fabrics are very time consuming and expensive, requiring weaving together polymer monofilaments using a loom and optionally binding a polymer overlay, or binding strips of polymeric ribbon material together using ultrasonic, infrared, or ultraviolet welding techniques. According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a layer of extruded polymeric material is formed separately from a woven fabric layer, and the layer of polymeric material is attached to the woven fabric layer to form the fabric or belt structure. The layer of polymeric material includes elevated elements that extend substantially in the machine direction or cross direction.
In an exemplary embodiment, the layer of polymeric material is extruded polymer netting. Extruded netting tubes were first manufactured around 1956 in accordance with the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,919,467. The process creates a polymer net which in general has diamond shaped openings extending along the length of the tube. Since this process was pioneered, it has grown tremendously, with extruded square netting tubes being described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,252,181, 3,384,692, and 4,038,008. Nets can also be extruded in flat sheets as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,666,609 which are then perforated or embossed to a selected geometric configuration. Heating and stretching the netting is conducted to enlarge the openings in the net structure and orient the polymers to increase strength. Tube netting can be stretched over a cylindrical mandrel while both tube and flat sheet netting can be stretched in the longitudinal and transverse directions using several techniques. U.S. Pat. No. 4,190,692 describes a process of stretching the netting to orient the polymer and increase strength.
Today, various types of polymers can be extruded to provide the optimal level of strength, stretch, heat resistance, abrasion resistance and a variety of other physical properties. Polymers can be coextruded in layers allowing for an adhesive agent to be incorporated into the outer shell of the netting to facilitate thermal lamination of multiple layers of netting.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, extruded netted tubes are used in fabrics in the papermaking process to lower the material cost, improve productivity, and improve product quality. The positions where this type of fabric can have the most impact are as the forming fabrics of any paper machine or as the structuring fabric on Through Air Dried (creped or uncreped), ATMOS, NTT, QRT or ETAD tissue paper making machines.
The extruded netted tubes have openings that are square, diamond, circular, or any geometric shape that can be produced with the dye equipment used in the extrusion process. The netted tubes are composed of any combination of polymers necessary to develop the stretch, strength, heat resistance, and abrasion resistance necessary for the application. Additionally, coextrusion is preferred with an adhesive agent incorporated into the outer shell of the netting. The adhesive agent facilitates thermal lamination of multiple layers of netting, thermal lamination of netting to woven monofilaments, or thermal lamination of netting to woven monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns needled with fine synthetic batt fibers. The netting is preferably stretched across a cylindrical mandrel to orient the polymers for increased strength and control over the size of the openings in the netting.
Netting that has been extruded in flat sheets and perforated with openings in the preferred geometric shapes can also be utilized. These nettings are preferably coextruded with an adhesive agent incorporated into the outer shell of the netting to facilitate thermal lamination of multiple layers of netting, thermal lamination of netting to woven monofilaments, or thermal lamination of netting to woven monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns needled with fine synthetic batt fibers. The netting is preferable heated and stretched in the longitudinal and transverse direction to control the size of the opening and increase strength of the net. When flat netting is utilized, seaming is used to produce an endless tribe. Seaming techniques using a laser or ultrasonic welding are preferred.
Optionally, as shown in
The woven fabric layer 4 is comprised of a woven polymeric fabric with a preferred mesh of between 10-30 frames/cm, a count of 5 to 30 frames/cm, and a caliper from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm. This layer preferably has a five shed non numerical consecutive warp-pick sequence (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,191,609) that is sanded to provide 20 to 50 percent contact area with the layer 2. The fabric or belt 1 with a woven fabric layer 4 of this design is suitable on any TAD or ATMOS asset. Optionally, the woven fabric layer 4 is composed of woven monofilaments or multi-filamentous yarns needled with fine synthetic batt fibers similar standard press fabric used in the conventional tissue papermaking press section. The fabric or belt 1 with a woven fabric layer 4 of this design is suitable on any NTT, QRT, or ETAD machine.
In an exemplary embodiment, the woven layer 310 is composed of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Conventional non-overlaid structuring fabrics made of PET typically have a failure mode in which fibrillation of the sheet side of the monofilaments occurs due to high pressure from cleaning showers, compression at the pressure roll nip, and heat from the TAD, UCTAD, or ATMOS module. The non-sheet side typically experiences some mild wear and loss of caliper due to abrasion across the paper machine rolls and is rarely the cause of fabric failure. By contrast, the extruded polymer layer 318 is composed of polyurethane, which has higher impact resistance as compared to PET to better resist damage by high pressure showers. It also has higher load capacity in both tension and compression such that it can undergo a change in shape under a heavy load but return to its original shape once the load is removed (which occurs in the pressure roll nip). Polyurethane also has excellent flex fatigue resistance, tensile strength, tear strength, abrasion resistance, and heat resistance. These properties allow the fabric to be durable and run longer on the paper machine than a standard woven fabric. Additionally the woven structure can be sanded to increase the surface area that contacts the extruded polymer layer to increase the total bonded area between the two layers. Varying the degree of sanding of the woven structure can alter the bonded area from 10% to up to 50% of the total surface area of the woven fabric that lies beneath the extruded polymer layer. The preferred bonded area is approximately 20-30% which provides sufficient durability to the fabric without closing excessive amounts of air channels in the X-Y plane of the fabric, which in turn maintains improved drying efficiency compared to conventional fabrics.
This press section improves the softness, bulk, and absorbency of web compared to the NTT process. The NTT process flattens the web inside the pocket of the fabric since all the force is being applied by the shoe press to push the web into a fabric pocket that is impermeable or of extremely low permeability to build up hydraulic force to remove the water. The inventive press section uses a press to push the web into a permeable fabric pocket while also drawing the sheet into the fabric pocket using vacuum. This reduces the necessary loading force needed by the shoe press and reduces the buildup of hydraulic pressure, both of which would compress the sheet. The result is that the web within the fabric pocket remains thicker and less compressed, giving the web increased bulk, increased void volume and absorbency, and increased bulk softness. The press section still retains the simplicity, high speed operation, and low energy cost platform of the NTT, but improves the quality of the product.
In a variation of the exemplary embodiment shown in
The following example and test results demonstrate e advantages of the present invention.
Softness Testing
Softness of a 1-ply tissue web was determined using a Tissue Softness Analyzer (TSA), available from EMTECH Electronic GmbH of Leipzig, Germany. A punch was used to cut out three 100 cm2 round samples from the web. One of the samples was loaded into the TSA, clamped into place, and the Tissue Basesheet II algorithm was selected from the list of available softness testing algorithms displayed by the TSA. After inputting parameters for the sample, the TSA measurement program was run. The test process was repeated for the remaining samples and the results for all the samples were averaged.
Stretch & MD, CD, and Wet CD Tensile Strength Testing
An Instron 3343 tensile tester, manufactured by Instron of Norwood, Mass., with a 100N load cell and 25.4 mm rubber coated jaw faces was used for tensile strength measurement. Prior to measurement, the Instron 3343 tensile tester was calibrated. After calibration, 8 strips of 1-ply product, each one inch by four inches, were provided as samples for each test. The strips were cut in the MD direction when testing MD and in the CD direction when testing CD. One of the sample strips was placed in between the upper jaw faces and clamp, and then between the lower jaw faces and clamp with a gap of 2 inches between the clamps. A test was run on the sample strip to obtain tensile and stretch. The test procedure was repeated until all the samples were tested. The values obtained for the eight sample strips were averaged to determine the tensile strength of the tissue.
Basis Weight
Using a dye and press, six 76.2 mm by 76.2 mm square samples were cut from a 1-ply product being careful to avoid any web perforations. The samples were placed in an oven at 105 deg C. for 5 minutes before being weighed on an analytical balance to the fourth decimal point. The weight of the sample in grams was divided by (0.0762 m)2 to determine the basis weight in grams/m2.
Caliper Testing
A Thwing-Albert ProGage 100 Thickness Tester, manufactured by Thwing Albert of West Berlin, N.J. was used for the caliper test. Eight 100 mm×100 mm square samples were cut from a 1-ply product. The samples were then tested individually and the results were averaged to obtain a caliper result for the base sheet.
A 1-ply creped tissue web was produced on a Through Air Dried paper machine with a triple layer headbox and dual TAD drums, with the tissue web having the following product attributes: Basis Weight 20.8 g/m2, Caliper 0.305 mm, MD tensile of 69.7 N/m, CD tensile of 43.7 N/m, an MD stretch of 22.4%, a CD stretch of 8.5%, and a 96 TSA.
The tissue web was multilayered with the fiber and chemistry of each layer selected and prepared individually to maximize product quality attributes of softness and strength. The first exterior layer, which was the layer that contacted the Yankee dryer, was prepared using 100% eucalyptus with 0.25 kg/ton of a synthetic polymer dry strength agent DPD-589 (Ashland, 500 Hercules Road, Wilmington Del., 19808). The interior layer was composed of 40% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers, 60% eucalyptus fibers, and 0.75 kg/ton of T526, softener/debonder (EKA Chemicals Inc., 1775 West Oak Commons Court, Marietta, Ga., 30062). The second exterior layer was composed of 40% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers, 60% eucalyptus fibers and with 1.875 kg/ton of a synthetic polymer dry strength agent DPD-589 at 3.0 kg/ton. The softwood was refined at 30 kwh/ton to impart the necessary tensile strength.
The fiber and chemicals mixtures were diluted to a solids of 0.5% consistency and fed to separate fan pumps which delivered the slurry to a triple layered headbox. The headbox pH was controlled to 7.0 by addition of sodium bicarbonate to the thick stock before the fan pumps. The headbox deposited the slurry to a nip formed by a forming roll, an outer forming wire, and inner forming wire where the wires were running at a speed of 1060 m/min. The slurry was drained through the outer wire, which was a KT194-P design supplied by Asters Johnson (4399 Corporate Rd, Charleston, S.C.), to aid with drainage, fiber support, and web formation. When the fabrics separated, the web followed the inner forming wire and was dried to approximately 27% solids using a series of vacuum boxes and a steam box.
The web was then transferred to a structuring fabric running at 1060 m/min with the aid of a vacuum box to facilitate fiber penetration into the structuring fabric to enhance bulk softness and web imprinting. The structuring fabric included a layer made from a netted tube of extruded polymer with a thickness of 0.5 mm, as shown in
The web was dried with the aid of two TAD hot air impingement drums to 81% moisture before transfer to the Yankee dryer. The web was held in intimate contact with the Yankee surface using an adhesive coating chemistry. The Yankee dryer was provided steam at 300 kPa while the installed hot air impingement hood over the Yankee dryer blew heated air at 125 deg C. The web was creped from the Yankee dryer at 13.2% crepe at 98.2% dryness using a steel blade at a pocket angle of 90 degrees.
A 1-ply creped tissue web was produced on a Through Air Dried paper machine with a triple layer headbox and dual TAD drums, with the tissue web having the following product attributes: Basis Weight 20.6 g/m2, Caliper 0.380 mm, MD tensile of 68.8 N/m, CD tensile of 37.9 N/m, and MD stretch of 21.1%, a CD stretch of 10.8%, and a 97.1 TSA.
The tissue web was multilayered with the fiber and chemistry of each layer selected and prepared individually to maximize product quality attributes of softness and strength. The first exterior layer, which was the layer that contacted the Yankee dryer, was prepared using 75% eucalyptus and 25% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers with 1.25 kg/ton of glyoxylated polyacrylamide, Hercobond 1194 and 0.25 kg/ton of a polyvinylamine retention aid, Hercobond 6950 (Solenis, 500 Hercules Road, Wilmington Del., 19808) and 0.75 kg/ton of Redibond 2038 (Ingredion 5 Westbrook Corporate Center Westchester, Ill. 60154). The interior layer was composed of 25% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers, 75% eucalyptus fibers, and 0.75 kg/ton of T526, a softener/debonder (EKA Chemicals Inc., 1775 West Oak Commons Court, Marietta, Ga., 30062) and 1.25 kg/ton of Hercobond 1194. The second exterior layer was composed of 100% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers with 2.25 kg/ton of Redibond 2038 and 0.25 kg/ton of Hercobond 6950. The softwood was refined at 13 kwh/ton to impart the necessary tensile strength.
The fiber and chemicals mixtures were diluted to a solids of 0.5% consistency and fed to separate fan pumps which delivered the slurry to a triple layered headbox. The headbox pH was controlled to 7.0 by addition of sodium bicarbonate to the thick stock before the fan pumps. The headbox deposited the slurry to a nip formed by a forming roll, an outer forming wire, and inner forming wire where the wires were running at a speed of 1060 m/min. The slurry was drained through the outer wire, which was a KT194-P design supplied by Asten Johnson (4399 Corporate Rd, Charleston, S.C.), to aid with drainage, fiber support, and web formation. When the fabrics separated, the web followed the inner forming wire and was dried to approximately 27% solids using a series of vacuum boxes and a steam box.
The web was then transferred to a structuring fabric running at 1060 m/min with the aid of a vacuum box to facilitate fiber penetration into the structuring fabric to enhance bulk softness and web imprinting. The structuring fabric included a layer made from a netted tube of extruded polymer with a thickness of 0.7 mm, as shown in
The web was dried with the aid of two TAD hot air impingement drums to approximately 80% moisture before transfer to the Yankee dryer. The web was held in intimate contact with the Yankee surface using an adhesive coating chemistry. The Yankee dryer was provided steam at 300 kPa while the installed hot air impingement hood over the Yankee dryer blew heated air at 105 deg C. The web was creped from the Yankee dryer at 13% crepe at approximately 98% dryness using a steel blade at a pocket angle of 90 degrees.
A 1-ply creped tissue web was produced on a Through Air Dried paper machine with a triple layer headbox and dual TAD drums, with the tissue web having the following product attributes: Basis Weight 20.4 g/m2, Caliper 0.336 mm, MD tensile of 76.3 N/m, CD tensile of 40.6 N/m, an MD stretch of 22.9%, a CD stretch of 10.1%, and a 90.9 TSA.
The tissue web was multilayered with the fiber and chemists of each layer selected and prepared individually to maximize product quality attributes of softness and strength. The first exterior layer, which was the layer that contacted the Yankee dryer, was prepared using 75% eucalyptus and 25% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers with 1.25 kg/ton of glyoxylated polyacrylamide, Hercobond 1194 and 0.25 kg/ton of a polyvinylamine retention aid, Hercobond 6950 (Solenis, 500 Hercules Road, Wilmington Del., 19808) and 1.25 kg/ton of Redibond 2038 (Ingredion 5 Westbrook Corporate Center Westchester, Ill. 60154). The interior layer was composed of 25% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers, 75% eucalyptus fibers, and 0.75 kg/ton of T526, a softener/debonder (EKA Chemicals Inc., 1775 West Oak Commons Court, Marietta, Ga., 30062) and 1.25 kg/ton of Hercobond 1194. The second exterior layer was composed of 100% northern bleached softwood kraft fibers with 3.75 kg/ton of Redibond 2038 and 0.25 kg/ton of Hercobond 6950. Softwood was refined at 16 kwh/ton to impart the necessary tensile strength.
The fiber and chemicals mixtures were diluted to a solids of 0.5% consistency and fed to separate fan pumps which delivered the slurry to a triple layered headbox. The headbox pH was controlled to 7.0 by addition of sodium bicarbonate to the thick stock before the fan pumps. The headbox deposited the slurry to a nip formed by a forming roll, an outer forming wire, and inner forming wire where the wires were running at a speed of 1060 m/min. The slurry was drained through the outer wire, which was a KT194-P design supplied by Asten Johnson (4399 Corporate Rd, Charleston, S.C.), to aid with drainage, fiber support, and web formation. When the fabrics separated, the web followed the inner forming wire and was dried to approximately 27% solids using a series of vacuum boxes and a steam box.
The web was then transferred to a structuring fabric running at 1060 m/min with the aid of a vacuum box to facilitate fiber penetration into the structuring fabric to enhance bulk softness and web imprinting. The structured fabric was a Prolux 005 design supplied by Albany (216 Airport Drive Rochester, N.H. 03867 USA) and was a 5 shed design with a warp pick sequence of 1, 3, 5, 2, 4, a 17.8 by 11.1 yarn/cm Mesh and Count, a 0.35 mm warp monofilament, a 0.50 mm weft monofilament, a 1.02 mm caliper, with a 640 cfm and a knuckle surface that was sanded to impart 27% contact area with the Yankee dryer.
The web was dried with the aid of two TAD hot air impingement drums to approximately 80% moisture before transfer to the Yankee dryer. The web was held in intimate contact with the Yankee surface using an adhesive coating chemistry. The Yankee dryer was provided steam at 300 kPa while the installed hot air impingement hood over the Yankee dryer blew heated air at 110 deg C. The web was creped from the Yankee dryer at 13.0% crepe at approximately 98% dryness using a steel blade at a pocket angle of 90 degrees.
A comparison of Example 2 with the Comparative Example demonstrates that the use of an overlaid fabric of the present invention allows for use of a lower temperature through the TAD section to arrive at the same sheet dryness. Example 1 differs from Example 2 and the Comparative Example in that Example 1 used less hardwood. The furnish mixtures were the same between Example 2 and the Comparative Example and the basis weight and quality of the sheet were also very similar.
Now that embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described in detail, various modifications and improvements thereon will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the present invention is to be construed broadly and not limited by the foregoing specification.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/431,497, filed Feb. 13, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,208,426, and entitled BELT OR FABRIC INCLUDING POLYMERIC LAYER FOR PAPERMAKING MACHINE, which in turn is a non-provisional based on and claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/294,158, filed Feb. 11, 2016, and entitled BELT OR FABRIC INCLUDING POLYMERIC LAYER FOR PAPERMAKING MACHINE, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2919467 | Mercer | Jan 1960 | A |
2926154 | Keim | Feb 1960 | A |
3026231 | Chavannes | Mar 1962 | A |
3049469 | Davison | Aug 1962 | A |
3058873 | Keim et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3066066 | Keim et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3097994 | Dickens et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3125552 | Loshaek et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3143150 | Buchanan | Aug 1964 | A |
3186900 | De Young | Jun 1965 | A |
3197427 | Schmalz | Jul 1965 | A |
3224986 | Butler et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3224990 | Babcock | Dec 1965 | A |
3227615 | Korden | Jan 1966 | A |
3227671 | Keim | Jan 1966 | A |
3239491 | Tsou et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3240664 | Earle, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
3240761 | Keim et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3248280 | Hyland, Jr. | Apr 1966 | A |
3250664 | Conte et al. | May 1966 | A |
3252181 | Hureau | May 1966 | A |
3301746 | Sanford et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3311594 | Earle, Jr. | Mar 1967 | A |
3329657 | Strazdins et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3332834 | Reynolds, Jr. | Jul 1967 | A |
3332901 | Keim | Jul 1967 | A |
3352833 | Earle, Jr. | Nov 1967 | A |
3384692 | Galt et al. | May 1968 | A |
3414459 | Wells | Dec 1968 | A |
3442754 | Espy | May 1969 | A |
3459697 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3473576 | Amneus | Oct 1969 | A |
3483077 | Aldrich | Dec 1969 | A |
3545165 | Greenwell | Dec 1970 | A |
3556932 | Coscia et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3573164 | Friedberg et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3609126 | Asao et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3666609 | Kalwaites et al. | May 1972 | A |
3672949 | Brown | Jun 1972 | A |
3672950 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3773290 | Mowery | Nov 1973 | A |
3778339 | Williams et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3813362 | Coscia et al. | May 1974 | A |
3855158 | Petrovich et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3877510 | Tegtmeier et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3905863 | Ayers | Sep 1975 | A |
3911173 | Sprague, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
3974025 | Ayers | Aug 1976 | A |
3994771 | Morgan, Jr. et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3998690 | Lyness et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4038008 | Larsen | Jul 1977 | A |
4075382 | Chapman et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4088528 | Berger et al. | May 1978 | A |
4098632 | Sprague, Jr. | Jul 1978 | A |
4102737 | Morton | Jul 1978 | A |
4129528 | Petrovich et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4147586 | Petrovich et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4184519 | McDonald et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4187618 | Diehl | Feb 1980 | A |
4190692 | Larsen | Feb 1980 | A |
4191609 | Trokhan | Mar 1980 | A |
4252761 | Schoggen et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4320162 | Schulz | Mar 1982 | A |
4331510 | Wells | May 1982 | A |
4382987 | Smart | May 1983 | A |
4440597 | Wells et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4501862 | Keim | Feb 1985 | A |
4507351 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4514345 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4515657 | Maslanka | May 1985 | A |
4528239 | Trokhan | Jul 1985 | A |
4529480 | Trokhan | Jul 1985 | A |
4537657 | Keim | Aug 1985 | A |
4545857 | Wells | Oct 1985 | A |
4637859 | Trokhan | Jan 1987 | A |
4678590 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4714736 | Juhl et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4770920 | Larsonneur | Sep 1988 | A |
4780357 | Akao | Oct 1988 | A |
4808467 | Suskind et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4836894 | Chance et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4849054 | Klowak | Jul 1989 | A |
4885202 | Lloyd et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4891249 | McIntyre | Jan 1990 | A |
4909284 | Kositake | Mar 1990 | A |
4949668 | Heindel et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949688 | Bayless | Aug 1990 | A |
4983256 | Combette et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996091 | McIntyre | Feb 1991 | A |
5059282 | Ampulski et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5143776 | Givens | Sep 1992 | A |
5149401 | Langevin et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152874 | Keller | Oct 1992 | A |
5211813 | Sawley et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239047 | Devore et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279098 | Fukuda | Jan 1994 | A |
5281306 | Kakiuchi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5334289 | Trokhan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347795 | Fukuda | Sep 1994 | A |
5397435 | Ostendorf et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399412 | Sudall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405501 | Phan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409572 | Kershaw et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5429686 | Chiu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439559 | Crouse | Aug 1995 | A |
5447012 | Kovacs et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5470436 | Wagle et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5487313 | Johnson | Jan 1996 | A |
5509913 | Yeo | Apr 1996 | A |
5510002 | Hermans et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5529665 | Kaun | Jun 1996 | A |
5581906 | Ensign et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591147 | Couture-Dorschner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607551 | Farrington, Jr. et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611890 | Vinson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628876 | Ayers et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635028 | Vinson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649916 | DiPalma et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671897 | Ogg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672248 | Wendt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679222 | Rasch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5685428 | Herbers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5728268 | Weisman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746887 | Wendt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753067 | Fukuda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772845 | Farrington, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5806569 | Gulya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827384 | Canfield et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832962 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846380 | Van Phan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855738 | Weisman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858554 | Neal et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865396 | Ogg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865950 | Vinson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893965 | Trokhan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904811 | Ampulski et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913765 | Burgess et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5942085 | Neal et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944954 | Vinson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948210 | Huston | Sep 1999 | A |
5980691 | Weisman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6036139 | Ogg | Mar 2000 | A |
6039838 | Kaufman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048938 | Neal et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060149 | Nissing et al. | May 2000 | A |
6106670 | Weisman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6149769 | Mohammadi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162327 | Batra et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162329 | Vinson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6187138 | Neal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200419 | Phan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203667 | Huhtelin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207734 | Vinson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231723 | Kanitz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6287426 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303233 | Amon et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319362 | Huhtelin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344111 | Wilhelm | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6419795 | Dutt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420013 | Vinson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420100 | Trokhan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423184 | Vahatalo et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6458246 | Kanitz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464831 | Trokhan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473670 | Huhtelin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6521089 | Griech et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537407 | Law et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547928 | Barnholtz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551453 | Weisman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551691 | Hoeft et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572722 | Pratt | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579416 | Vinson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602454 | McGuire et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607637 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610173 | Lindsay et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613194 | Kanitz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6660362 | Lindsay et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673202 | Burazin | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701637 | Lindsay et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6755939 | Vinson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6773647 | McGuire et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797117 | McKay et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6808599 | Burazin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821386 | Weisman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821391 | Scherb et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827818 | Farrington, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6863777 | Kanitz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6896767 | Wilhelm | May 2005 | B2 |
6939443 | Ryan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6986830 | Scherb et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998017 | Lindsay et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998024 | Burazin | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005043 | Toney et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7014735 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7105465 | Patel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155876 | VanderTuin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7157389 | Branham et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182837 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194788 | Clark et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7235156 | Baggot | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269929 | VanderTuin et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7294230 | Flugge-Berendes et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311853 | Vinson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328550 | Floding et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339378 | Han et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351307 | Scherb et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357847 | Weigant | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387706 | Herman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399378 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419569 | Hermans | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427434 | Busam | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431801 | Conn et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7432309 | Vinson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442278 | Murray et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452447 | Duan et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7476293 | Herman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494563 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7510631 | Scherb et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513975 | Burma | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563344 | Beuther | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7582187 | Scherb et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611607 | Mullally et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622020 | Awofeso | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7662462 | Noda | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670678 | Phan | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683126 | Neal et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686923 | Scherb et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687140 | Manifold et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691230 | Scherb et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7744722 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7744726 | Scherb et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799382 | Payne et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811418 | Klerelid et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815978 | Davenport et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823366 | Schoeneck | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842163 | Nickel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7867361 | Salaam et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7871692 | Morin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887673 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905989 | Scherb et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914866 | Shannon et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7931781 | Scherb et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7951269 | Herman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955549 | Noda | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959764 | Ringer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972475 | Chan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7989058 | Manifold et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034463 | Leimbach et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051629 | Pazdernik et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075739 | Scherb et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092652 | Scherb et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118979 | Herman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147649 | Tucker et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8152959 | Elony et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8196314 | Munch | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216427 | Klerelid et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236135 | Prodoehl et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8303773 | Scherb et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8382956 | Boechat et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8402673 | Da Silva et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409404 | Harper et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435384 | Da Silva et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8440055 | Scherb et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8445032 | Topolkaraev et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454800 | Mourad et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470133 | Cunnane et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8506756 | Denis et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8544184 | Da Silva et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574211 | Morita | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8580083 | Boechat et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8728277 | Boechat et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8758569 | Aberg et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771466 | Denis et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801903 | Mourad et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8815057 | Eberhardt et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8822009 | Riviere et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8968517 | Ramaratnam et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8980062 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005710 | Jones et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D734617 | Seitzinger et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
9095477 | Yamaguchi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
D738633 | Seitzinger et al. | Sep 2015 | S |
9315940 | Lee | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9382666 | Ramaratnam et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9506203 | Ramaratnam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9580872 | Ramaratnam et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9702089 | Ramaratnam et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9702090 | Ramaratnam et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9719213 | Miller, IV et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9725853 | Ramaratnam et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10208426 | Sealey | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10619309 | Sealey | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20010018068 | Lorenzi et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020028230 | Eichhorn et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020060049 | Kanitz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061386 | Carson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098317 | Jaschinski et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110655 | Seth | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115194 | Lange et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125606 | McGuire et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030024674 | Kanitz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030056911 | Hermans et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056917 | Jimenez | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070781 | Hermans et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114071 | Everhart et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030159401 | Sorensson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030188843 | Kanitz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218274 | Boutilier et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040118531 | Shannon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123963 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040126601 | Kramer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040126710 | Hill et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168784 | Duan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173333 | Hermans et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040234804 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050016704 | Huhtelin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050069679 | Stelljes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069680 | Stelljes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098281 | Schulz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112115 | Khan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123726 | Broering et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130536 | Siebers et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136222 | Hada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148257 | Hermans et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150626 | Kanitz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166551 | Keane et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050241786 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050241788 | Baggot et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252626 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280184 | Sayers et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287340 | Morelli et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005916 | Stelljes et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013998 | Stelljes, et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019567 | Sayers | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060083899 | Burazin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093788 | Behm et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113049 | Knobloch et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130986 | Flugge-Berendes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060194022 | Boutilier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060269706 | Shannon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070020315 | Shannon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070131366 | Underhill et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137813 | Nickel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137814 | Gao | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070170610 | Payne et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070240842 | Scherb et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070251659 | Fernandes et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070251660 | Walkenhaus et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267157 | Kanitz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272381 | Elony et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275866 | Dykstra | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298221 | Vinson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080035289 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080076695 | Uitenbroek et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080156450 | Klerelid et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199655 | Monnerie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080245498 | Ostendorf et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080302493 | Boatman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308247 | Ringer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090020248 | Sumnicht et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090056892 | Rekoske | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061709 | Nakai et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090205797 | Fernandes et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218056 | Manifold et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100065234 | Klerelid et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100119779 | Ostendorf et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129597 | Hansen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100224338 | Harper et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100230064 | Eagles et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236034 | Eagles et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100239825 | Sheehan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272965 | Schinkoreit et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110027545 | Harlacher et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110180223 | Klerelid et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189435 | Manifold et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110189442 | Manifold et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206913 | Manifold et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110223381 | Sauter et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253329 | Manifold et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265967 | Van Phan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303379 | Boechat et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120144611 | Baker et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152475 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177888 | Escafere et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120244241 | McNeil | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120267063 | Klerelid et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120297560 | Zwick et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130008135 | Moore et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029105 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029106 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130133851 | Boechat et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150817 | Kainth et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160960 | Hermans et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130209749 | Myangiro et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130220566 | Straub | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130248129 | Manifold et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130327487 | Espinosa et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140004307 | Sheehan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140041820 | Ramaratnam et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041822 | Boechat et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050890 | Zwick et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053994 | Manifold et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140096924 | Rekokske et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140182798 | Polat et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140242320 | McNeil et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140272269 | Hansen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272747 | Ciurkot | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140284237 | Gosset | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140360519 | George et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150059995 | Ramaratnam et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150102526 | Ward et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129145 | Chou et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150211179 | Alias | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150241788 | Yamaguchi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150330029 | Ramaratnam et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160060811 | Riding et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160069022 | Lee | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090692 | Eagles et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090693 | Eagles et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160101590 | Kane | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160130762 | Ramaratnam et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145810 | Miller, IV et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160159007 | Miller, IV et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160160448 | Miller, IV et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185041 | Topolkaraev et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185050 | Topolkaraev et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160273168 | Ramaratnam et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273169 | Ramaratnam et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160289897 | Ramaratnam et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160289898 | Ramaratnam et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170044717 | Quigley | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170101741 | Sealey et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170167082 | Ramaratnam et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170226698 | LeBrun et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170233946 | Sealey | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170253422 | Anklam et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170268178 | Ramaratnam et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180066399 | Sealey | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190112761 | Sealey | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190112762 | Sealey | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190360153 | Sealey | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2168894 | Aug 1997 | CA |
2795139 | Oct 2011 | CA |
3014325 | Aug 2017 | CA |
1138356 | Dec 1996 | CN |
1207149 | Feb 1999 | CN |
1244899 | Feb 2000 | CN |
1268559 | Oct 2000 | CN |
1377405 | Oct 2002 | CN |
2728254 | Sep 2005 | CN |
4242539 | Aug 1993 | DE |
0097036 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0979895 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1911574 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1339915 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2123826 | May 2009 | EP |
946093 | Jan 1964 | GB |
2013208298 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2014213138 | Nov 2014 | JP |
9606223 | Feb 1996 | WO |
0075423 | Dec 2000 | WO |
200382550 | Oct 2003 | WO |
200445834 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2007070145 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008019702 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009006709 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009061079 | May 2009 | WO |
2009067079 | May 2009 | WO |
2011028823 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2012003360 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2013024297 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013136471 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014022848 | Feb 2014 | WO |
201500755 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015176063 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016077594 | May 2016 | WO |
2016086019 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016090242 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016090364 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016085704 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2017066465 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017066656 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017139786 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO-2017139786 | Aug 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US15/62483 dated May 6, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/63986 dated Mar. 29, 2016. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US15/63986 dated Mar. 29, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/64284 dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US15/64284 dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US13/53593 dated Dec. 30, 2013. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US13/53593 dated Dec. 30, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/31411 dated Aug. 13, 2015. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US15/31411 dated Aug. 13, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/60398 dated Jan. 29, 2016. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US15/60398 dated Jan. 29, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US15/62483 dated May 6, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US16/56871 dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US16/56871 dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2016/057163 dated Dec. 23, 2016. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US2016/057163 dated Dec. 23, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/029890 dated Jul. 14, 2017. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US2017/029890 dated Jul. 14, 2017. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/032746 dated Aug. 7, 2017. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US2017/032746 dated Aug. 7, 2017. |
International Search Report for PCT/US17/17705 dated Jun. 9, 2017. |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for PCT/US17/17705 dated Jun. 9, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US2013/053593 dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
Supplementary European Search Report of EP 13 82 6461 dated Apr. 1, 2016. |
European Search Report dated Oct. 18, 2019 in connection with European Patent Application No. 17 750 997.5. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190112762 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62294158 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15431497 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16229450 | US |