The invention relates to a belt pulley decoupler for transmitting the drive torque from belts of an auxiliary unit belt drive to the shaft of one of the auxiliary units, with:
Rotational oscillations and irregularities that are introduced by the crankshaft of an internal combustion engine into its auxiliary unit belt drive can be compensated in a known way by belt pulley decouplers that are usually known simply as decouplers and are typically formed as alternator belt pulleys. The wrap-around band is used as a one-way coupling that transmits, in the closed state, the drive torque from the belt pulley to the hub, wherein the elasticity of the decoupler spring connected in series to the wrap-around band smooths the rotational irregularities originating from the belt drive. For a delayed rotating belt pulley, the wrap-around band opens, wherein—then conversely—no significant torque can be transmitted from the hub to the belt pulley, so that the alternator shaft loaded with high mass inertia can overtake the belt pulley.
A belt pulley decoupler with wrap-around band arranged radially on the inside and decoupler spring arranged radially on the outside in the form of a helical torsion spring is known from DE 10 2009 052 611 A1.
A belt pulley decoupler according to the class with radially interchanged arrangement of the wrap-around band and helical torsion spring emerges, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 8,047,920 B2.
Starting from that document, the present invention is based on the objective of disclosing such a belt pulley decoupler in an alternative structural design.
The solution to this objective is given from one or more features of the invention. Accordingly, both ends of the wrap-around band should expand radially while transmitting the drive torque, wherein the first wrap-around band running in the flow of drive torque on the side of the belt pulley is tensioned against the inner lateral surface of a first sleeve that is rotationally locked in the belt pulley, and wherein the second wrap-around band running in the flow of drive torque on the side of the decoupler spring is tensioned against the inner lateral surface of a second sleeve that is supported so that it can rotate in the first sleeve.
Differently than in the prior art cited above, the belt pulley decoupler comprises two sleeves that are supported so that they can rotate one in the other and in which the wrap-around band expanding radially under load wraps around with both ends and transmits the drive torque. Consequently, the components coupled with the wrap-around band on the drive side and driven side have simple and economically producible contact geometries for the wrap-around band ends. In particular, the rotatable support of the second sleeve in the first sleeve prevents the indirect contact of the wrap-around band with the inner lateral surface of the belt pulley, so that a heat treatment increasing the wear resistance and/or surface coating of the belt pulley can be eliminated.
In the preferred design of a flank-less and consequently completely cylindrical wrap-around band, the inner lateral surfaces of the two sleeves are also completely cylindrical, so that the drive torque is transmitted exclusively through friction contact forces between the outer lateral surface of the wrap-around band and the inner lateral surface of the two sleeves.
Both sleeves can be economically producible sheet formed parts, wherein the first sleeve is preferably locked in rotation by an interference fit assembly in the belt pulley. The first sleeve can be provided with a first diameter step as an axial stop for the second sleeve and with a second diameter step as an axial stop for the wrap-around band. This sleeve geometry with two steps in diameter makes it possible for the inner diameter of the belt pulley to be produced economically (turned) essentially with no or at most with only small diameter steps.
For the assembly of the wrap-around band in the first sleeve, it can be preferred if the first sleeve is provided with circumferentially distributed openings for a mounting tool. This tool engages in the openings and reduces the outer diameter of the wrap-around band, in order to be able to introduce the wrap-around band with the lowest possible resistance axially over the first diameter step up to contact with the second diameter step in the first sleeve. The openings are arranged in the rotating bearing section for the second sleeve and preferably close to the first diameter step.
Additional features of the invention are given from the following description and from the drawings in which an embodiment and alternative structural details of a belt pulley decoupler according to the invention are shown for the alternator arranged in the auxiliary unit belt drive of an internal combustion engine. Shown are:
The inner diameter of the belt pulley 2 is uniform in the entire axial range between the radial bearing ring 8 and the outer ring of the ball bearing 7 and therefore can be processed by turning in an especially simple and economical way. The belt pulley 4 has an extension 9 that is stepped in diameter only on the end away from the alternator and in which a protective cap 10 is snapped on after the decoupler 1 is screwed onto the alternator shaft.
The components that are essential for the function of the decoupler 1 are a one-way coupling 11 constructed as wrap-around band 11 and a decoupler spring 12 that is connected in series with the wrap-around band 11—with respect to the flow of drive torque from the belt pulley 2 to the hub 4—and that is constructed as helical torsion spring 12. The wrap-around band 11 and the helical torsion spring 12 extend coaxial relative to each other in the direction of the rotational axis 13 of the decoupler 1, wherein the wrap-around band 11 is arranged radially between the belt pulley 2 and the helical torsion spring 12 and consequently surrounds the helical torsion spring 12.
Both the wrap-around band 11 wound to the right and also the helical torsion spring 12 wound to the left are completely cylindrical and have flank-less ends on both sides, which widen the wrap-around band 11 or the helical torsion spring 12 in the radial direction during the transmission of the drive torque. Here, the first wrap-around band end 14 running on the side of the belt pulley 2 in the flow of drive torque is tensioned against the cylindrical inner lateral surface 15 of a first sleeve 16 that is locked in rotation in the belt pulley 2 by an interference fit assembly. The second wrap-around band end 17 running on the side of the helical torsion spring 12 in the flow of drive torque is tensioned against the cylindrical inner lateral surface 18 of a second sleeve 19 that is supported so that it can rotate in the first sleeve 16 and whose inner lateral surface 18 has the same diameter as the inner lateral surface 15.
The drive torque introduced by the belt pulley 2 is introduced into the helical torsion spring 12 only by static friction between the first sleeve 16 and the first wrap-around end 14 on one side and between the second wrap-around end 17 and the second sleeve 19 on the other side and transmitted from there to the hub 4. The belt pulley 2 is therefore an economically produced turned part that does not require heat treatment or a coating for the purpose of wear protection, but instead is provided with only corrosion protection. The axial forces of the helical torsion spring 12 acting on the second sleeve 19 are supported by a sliding bearing ring 20 on the inner ring of the ball bearing 7.
The wrap-around band 11 allows the alternator shaft and the hub 4 mounted on it to be overtaken with respect to the belt pulley 2 when the torque changes direction. In this state, the wrap-around band 11 contracts with respect to its (unloaded) initial diameter and slips in one or both sleeves 16, 19, wherein the torque that can be transmitted is reduced to the sliding friction torque between the two slipping contact partners.
The mutual rotational bearing and structural design of the two sleeves 16 and 19 is explained below in connection with
The end section 25 of the first sleeve 16 extending from the second diameter step 22 in the direction away from the alternator wraps around the helical torsion spring 12 with minimal radial clearance, in order to prevent, in this area, an impermissible widening of the helical torsion spring 12 under the effect of torque forces.
As also becomes clear in connection with
In the operating state of the decoupler 1 that is free from drive torque and in which the hub 4 overtakes the belt pulley 2, the sliding friction of the slipping wrap-around band 11 leads to the result that one or both spring ends 26, 28 of the helical torsion spring 12 are loaded with a friction torque that loads the spring ends 26, 28 in the circumferential direction of the axially rising spring contact surfaces 33, 34. This undesired ramp run-up of the helical torsion spring 12 is prevented by a so-called anti-ramp-up mechanism. Here, the spring ends 26, 28 form mutual rotational stops with the spring plates 27, 29, wherein each of these stops limits a relative rotation of the spring ends 26, 28 relative to the spring plates 27, 29, with this rotation increasing the circumferential distance between the circumferential end sides 35, 36 of the spring ends 26, 28 and the circumferential steps 31, 32 of the spring plates 27, 29. In other words, the rotational stops allow the transmission of tensile forces to the spring ends 26, 28, so that despite the sliding friction torque that is active then, the relative circumferential position of the spring ends 26, 28 relative to the spring plates 27, 29, as it is during pressure contact that transmits the drive torque, is not significantly changed even in the overtaking operation of the decoupler 1.
The rotational stops comprise rotating-locking contours according to the invention, which are formed, on the side of the spring plates 27, 29 by circumferential wedge-shaped projections 40, 41 rising in the direction of the steps 31, 32 and on the side of the spring ends 26, 28 by axial and, in the present case, rectangular recesses 42, 43. During the assembly of the decoupler 1, the wedge shape of the projections 40, 41 allows a circumferentially initially undirected placement of the spring ends 26, 28 on the spring plates 27, 29 and then its low-resistance relative rotation that decreases the circumferential distance between the end sides 35, 36 of the spring ends 26, 28 and the circumferential steps 31, 32 of the spring plates 27, 29 until the projections 40, 41 lock in the recesses 42, 43. The projection 40 of the spring plate 27 is formed like the formations 37 to 39 in the sheet formed part.
In principle, the rotating-locking contours could also be arranged alternatively in a reverse arrangement, wherein then, on one side, the projections are part of the spring ends and rise in a wedge shape away from the circumferential steps 31, 32 of the spring plates and on the other hand, the spring plates are recessed accordingly.
The hub 4′ has two parts with a base body and a sheet sleeve 44 pressed on this base body for forming the spring plate 29′ locked in rotation with the hub 4′. This allows the hub 4′ to be produced economically as a turned part with constant outer diameter. Relative to the circumferential groove 30 on the outer lateral surface of the one-part hub 4, in this design, the axial enclosure of the radial bearing ring 8′ is not realized on the side of the hub 4′, but instead by a retaining ring 45 that is pressed into the belt pulley 2′ and is formed with a U-profile as a sheet formed part.
Another detail relates to the contour of the anti-ramp-up mechanism. The rotational locking contours are not wedge-shaped in this construction, but instead circumferentially symmetric with circular segment-shaped projections 40′, 41′ on the spring plates 27′, 29′ and circular segment-shaped recesses 42′, 43′ in the spring ends 26′, 28′ of the helical torsion spring 12′.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 224 608 | Dec 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2016/200572 | 12/1/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/097299 | 6/15/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1766585 | Banfield, Jr. | Jun 1930 | A |
1948816 | Hollerith | Feb 1934 | A |
2516829 | Reeves | Jul 1950 | A |
4002081 | Schultz, Jr. | Jan 1977 | A |
5139463 | Bytzek | Aug 1992 | A |
5722909 | Thomey | Mar 1998 | A |
6083130 | Mevissen | Jul 2000 | A |
7153227 | Dell | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7591357 | Antchak | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618337 | Jansen | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7708661 | Pflug | May 2010 | B2 |
7878315 | Saito | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891475 | Zhu | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892124 | Hodjat | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7975821 | Antchak | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8047920 | Jansen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8313400 | Serkh | Nov 2012 | B2 |
9033832 | Serkh | May 2015 | B1 |
9068608 | Serkh et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9175753 | Frankowski et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9605743 | Michelotti | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20040014540 | Dell | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040112700 | Liston | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050250607 | Jansen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20150167816 | Li | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102498307 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102859233 | Jan 2013 | CN |
203413096 | Jan 2014 | CN |
105008747 | Oct 2015 | CN |
60318721 | Jun 2008 | DE |
102009052611 | May 2011 | DE |
102012006285 | Oct 2013 | DE |
2894364 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2003301860 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2012061930 | May 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180328414 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |