The present invention relates to a bending press according to the preamble of the main claim.
A known bending press is usually formed by a stationary support structure, two toolholder units, movable relative to one another between an open position and a closed position, and actuator means able to command the relative motion of said toolholder units and to apply a bending force between the stationary support structure and at least one of said toolholder units.
During bending operations, the toolholder units of a same bending press are subject to flexion deformations under the action of the bending load. The amplitude of such deformations depends on the bending load and on the geometry of the press, in particular on the rigidity and on the type of connection constraints between the toolholder units and the stationary support structure. Deformations of the toolholder tools are the main cause of imprecision in the bending operation. Manufacturers of bending presses have devoted particular attention to the development of systems that allow to control the deformation of the toolholder units under load. The purpose of these systems is to minimise the differences between the deformed profiles of the two toolholder units. Known devices for reducing bending inaccuracies due to the deformations under load of the toolholder units can be classified according to two categories:
1) active devices: these devices entail the use of actuators, also numerically controlled, which produce variations in the deformed profile of one or both the beams bearing the bending tools.
2) passive devices: the geometry of the toolholder units is designed in such a way as to obtain similar deformations in terms of shape and amplitude on both toolholder beams.
In particular in the field of passive devices, toolholder tables have been proposed, provided with constraining systems which allow to optimise the deformed profiles of the beam. In particular, bending presses are already known in which the lower toolholder unit comprises two parallel support beams fastened to the stationary support structure of the press and a toolholder beam centrally positioned between the two support beams and connected to said support beams by means of rigid pivots or by means of welds, arranged in such a way that under the action of the bending load the lower toolholder beam tends to be deformed in a manner corresponding to the upper toolholder beam.
The present invention has the aim of providing a bending press that allows to reduce to negligible values the flexion deformations of one or of both toolholder beams.
According to the present invention, said aim is achieved by a bending press having the characteristics set out in the main claim.
The present invention provides for the realisation of at least one of the toolholder units of a bending press in the form of an assembly comprising:
A toolholder unit according to the present invention allows to reduce to wholly negligible values the deformations of the precision structure that is destined to bear the bending tool. Such deformations can easily be contained within the tolerance required by the bending work process. Flexion deformations are concentrated on the reaction structure, whose task is to sustain the precision structure through the elastic means and to transfer the bending load to the support structure of the press.
As shall become more readily apparent in the remainder of the description, the deformations of the reaction structure have no influence on the precision of the bending operation.
The present invention therefore allows to obtain very high bending precision with a relatively light dimensioning of the toolholder units.
An embodiment of the present invention shall now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, provided purely by way of non limiting example, in which:
With reference to
According to the present invention, at least one of the two toolholder units 12, 13 comprises a precision structure whereon is destined to be mounted a bending tool, said structure being connected by elastic means to a reaction structure. From the conceptual point of view, the precision structure is supported in floating fashion by the reaction structure and it is free to move relative to the reaction structure under the action of the bending load. Between the precision structure and the reaction structure there is no bond except the one constituted by the elastic means whose task is to allow the relative motion between the precision structure and the reaction structure and to transfer the bending force from the precision structure to the reaction structure.
A concrete embodiment of the present invention is schematically shown in
With reference to
In a variation of the present invention, the precision structure could be constituted by the outer beams 15 and the reaction structure by the central beam 17.
The central beam 17 constituting the precision structure is provided with conventional means (not shown) which allow to fasten a bending tool to the outer edge 18 of the beam 17. Generally, the beam 17 of the upper toolholder unit 13 is destined to bear a punch whilst the beam 17 of the lower toolholder unit 12 is destined to bear a die.
The beam 17 of each toolholder unit 12, 13 is connected to the two lateral beams 15 solely by elastic means having a set stability in order to allow a relative motion of predetermined amplitude of the central beam 17 with respect to the lateral beams 15 under the action of the nominal bending load of the press.
In the practical embodiment shown by way of example in the figures, the elastic means connecting the precision structure 17 to the reaction structure 15 comprise a plurality of elastic devices 19 each of which is preferably constructed as shown in
The beams 15 and 17 are provided with aligned holes 25, 26 within which is inserted a respective elastic device 19. As shown in
As shown in
With reference to
The rigidities ki of the elastic devices 19 differ from each other and are determined in such a way that the elastic reactions R of the individual elastic devices 19 are mutually identical. Therefore, if n is the number of elastic devices 19 and q is the force per unit of length (or unit load) acting on the beam 17, one will have:
n×R=q×L.
Each of the elastic devices 19 is compressed by a quantity equal to f−di. Therefore, the elastic reaction R of each elastic device 19 will be R=Ki×(f−di).
The rigidity Ki of each elastic device 19 is computed as follows:
1) the number n of the elastic devices 19 is chosen and, as a function of the nominal bending load q, the value of each elastic reaction R is computed from the relationship:
2) the reaction structure 15 behaves like a beam resting at the ends and subjected to n forces, all with intensity R. Depending on the shape and dimensions of the reaction structure 15, a calculation is used to determine individual deformations di in correspondence with each point of application of the force R;
3) a displacement f is imposed on the precision beam 17 such that f is greater than the maximum deformation di; the value f must also be lesser than the distance at rest (in the absence of a load) between the semi-cylindrical bodies 20 of each elastic device 19;
4) the rigidity of each elastic element 19 is determined from the relationship:
From the structural viewpoint, the precision beam 17 behaves like a beam whereon on one side acts a uniformly distributed load q and on the other act n mutually equal forces, all with intensity R. The beam is in equilibrium conditions when the relationship n×R=q×L is true. The precision structure 17 is substantially undeformed with the exception of the small elastic deformations between the points of application of the forces R due to the distributed load q. This deformation can easily be contained within the tolerance limits allowed for bending work processes. The elastic deformations of the reaction structure 15 do not influence bending precision in any way. Therefore, the beams 15 constituting the reaction structure may be dimensioned in relatively light fashion since these beams can be deformed elastically even by significant amounts under the action of the elastic reaction forces n×R.
The different rigidity of the elastic devices 19 can be obtained by varying the number or the dimensions of the Belleville washers 24 with which is device 19 is provided.
Naturally, the present invention may be subjected to numerous variations with respect to what is described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the invention. For example, for technological or constructive reasons it could be necessary to position the elastic devices 19 at non constant relative distances. In this case, there will be deformation differences on the individual segments of the precision beam, but the condition that the fastening points all move by the same quantity f is still met by appropriately re-dimensioning the rigidities Ki. With unequal distances between the devices 19, the elastic reactions Ri are different in the different fastening points, the calculation process shall develop as follows:
1) the number of fastening points is decided along with the distance between them, and the value of each reaction Ri is calculated;
2) the reactions Ri are applied on the reaction beam and the displacements di are calculated in correspondence with each point of application of the forces Ri,
3) a constant displacement f of the precision beam is imposed, such that f is greater than the greatest deformation di: f>dmax
4) the rigidity of each elastic element is derived from the relationship:
It must be noted that if the distance between the elastic devices 19 is not constant, there are variations in the maximum flexion of the prevision beam if the rigidity of the prevision beam is constant along its length. It is possible to obtain equal flexion amounts of the precision beam on the bays of different length by appropriately varying the rigidity of the beam along its longitudinal direction.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2002A0904 | Oct 2002 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3682465 | Hanni | Aug 1972 | A |
3702558 | Swenson et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3914975 | Kawano | Oct 1975 | A |
4014204 | Hanni et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4098109 | Cailloux et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4426873 | Pearson et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
5293972 | Krumholz | Mar 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 058043 | Mar 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040099038 A1 | May 2004 | US |