This invention relates in general to betting on events and, more particularly, to a system and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event.
Wagering on sporting events, such as horse races, for example, is a large and growing industry in many parts of the world. Various types of betting products or systems are available for various types of sporting events For example, typical horse racing bets allow bettors to bet on a single horse or on several horses in a particular race or series of races. For instance, a bettor can bet on a particular horse to finish first (win), finish in the top two (place), or finish in the top three (show). A bettor may also make various combination bets with multiple horses, such as an exacta bet (covering the top two horses in order) or a trifecta bet (covering the top three horses in order). In addition, a bettor may bet on a series of races, such as the daily double (winners of two consecutive races), the pick-three (winners of three consecutive races), and the pick-six (winners of six consecutive races), for example.
In a pari-mutuel betting system, all bets regarding a particular event are aggregated, a commission (or “take-out”) is taken by the track, and the remainder is distributed among the winning bettors. For example, pari-mutuel betting systems are commonly used in North America (and other various places throughout the world) for betting on horse races.
According to one embodiment, a method of managing bets is provided. The method includes receiving one or more win bets and one or more group bets. Each win bet includes a bet that a participant selected from a set of participants in an event will win the event. Each group bet includes a bet that one of a subset of the set of participants will win the event, wherein the subset includes a plurality of the set of participants. Results of the event identifying a winning participant from the set of participants are received. An amount of a win bet payout for at least a portion of the win bets that comprise a bet on the winning participant is determined. An amount of a group bet payout for at least one of the group bets is also determined.
According to another embodiment, a system for managing bets is provided. The system includes a memory coupled to a processor. The memory is operable to store one or more win bets and one or more group bets. Each win bet includes a bet that a participant selected from a set of participants in an event will win the event. Each group bet includes a bet that one of a subset of the set of participants will win the event, wherein the subset includes a plurality of the set of participants. The memory is also operable to store results of the event identifying a winning participant from the set of participants. The processor is operable to determine an amount of a win bet payout for at least a portion of the win bets that comprise a bet on the winning participant, and also to determine an amount of a group bet payout for at least one of the group bets.
Various embodiments of the present invention may benefit from numerous advantages. It should be noted that one or more embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of the advantages discussed below.
One advantage of the invention is that in an event which includes a set of participants, a bettor may bet on a subset of the set of participants, and win the bet if any of the subset of participants wins the event. Thus, for example, a bettor who believes that a particular participant in an event will not win the event, but is unsure of which other participant to bet on, may purchase a group bet which includes a group of participants which excludes the particular participant. For example, a bettor who believes that the favorite in a horse race will not win the race, but is unsure on which other horse to bet, may purchase a group bet which includes every horse in the field except for the favorite.
In this manner, a bettor may bet on all horses other than the favorite (or another particular horse), thus effectively betting against the favorite, without having to place individual bets on each of the non-favorite horses. In some situations, a bettor may make such a group bet on an event when he or she otherwise would not have made a bet on the event, since the bettor need not place individual bets on each of the non-favorite horses. This may increase the total pool of wagers on the event, which may increase profits at least for the one or more entities that collect a percentage of the take-out on such wagers.
Another advantage of the invention is that such group bets may be provided in a pari-mutuel betting system in which all bets regarding a particular event are pooled.
Other advantages will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
System 10 permits clients 20 to place at least both win bets (or straight wagers) 22, as well as group bets 24 on a betting event having a set of event participants, such as a horse race, dog race, auto race, or golf tournament, for example. A win bet (or straight wager) 22 is a bet that a particular participant will win the event. For example, in a horse race, an example of a win bet 22 is a bet that Horse #3 will win the race. A group bet 24, on the other hand, is a bet that one of a group, or subset, of the set of participants will win the event. In some situations, the subset or group may include all of the participants in an event except for a single participant. In such situations, the group may include all of the participants in an event except for the “favorite,” or in other words, the participant having (or predicted to have) the best chance of winning the event. For example, in a 14-horse race in which Horse #3 is the favorite, an example group bet 24 is a bet that any of the horses except for Horse #3 will win the race.
By placing a group bet 24, a client 20 may bet on all participants other than the favorite (or another particular participant), thus effectively betting against the favorite, without having to place individual bets on each of the non-favorite participants. Thus, for example, a bettor who believes that the favorite horse in a horse race a will not win the race, but is unsure on which other horse to bet, may purchase a group bet 24 which includes all horses except the favorite.
In some embodiments, more than one different group bet 24 may be available to clients 20. For example, for a particular ten-horse race, a first group bet 24 may be available which covers Horses #2-#10, thus effectively providing a bet against Horse #1; a second group bet 24 may be available which covers Horses #1 and #3-#10, thus effectively providing a bet against Horse #2; and a third group bet 24 may be available which covers Horses #1-#4 and #6-#10, thus effectively providing a bet against Horse #5.
In alternative embodiments, the group of participants covered by a particular group bet 24 may exclude two, three, or any other number of participants in the event. For example, for the ten-horse race discussed above, a group bet 24 may be available which covers Horses #3-#4 and #6-#10, thus effectively providing a bet against Horses #1, #2 and #5. The number of participants for which a particular group bet 24 may cover may be related to the number of participants in the event. For example, in one embodiment, a group bet 24 in a six-horse race may cover all but one horse (such as the favorite horse), a group bet 24 in a eight-horse race may cover all but two horses (such as the top two favorites), and a group bet 24 in a race of ten or more horses may cover all but three horses (such as the top three favorites).
In some embodiments, system 10 is a pari-mutuel betting system in which all bets 12 (or at least a relevant group of bets 12) regarding a particular event are pooled, a commission (or “take-out”) is taken by the track or other wagering provider, and the remainder is distributed among the winning bettors. In other embodiments, system 10 may be another type of betting system, such as a betting system in which clients 20 take positions against a bookmaker, for example.
Group bets 24 may be incorporated into an existing pari-mutuel pool in the following manner. Suppose, for example, a group bet 24 which covers all participants in an event except for the favorite participant. At the close of betting on a particular event, the amount of each individual group bet 24 (less the take-out rate) is divided and allocated among all participants covered by the group bet 24 such that the potential payout (in other words, the payout if the group bet 24 wins) for the group bet 24 is related to the odds on the favorite participant. Generally, the lower the odds on the favorite participant (in other words, the more that has been bet on the favorite), the greater the potential payout for the group bet 24. Thus, a group bet 24 in a race in which the favorite participant has 3-5 odds pays more than a similar group bet 24 in a race in which the favorite participant has 2-1 odds. In one embodiment, the payout for the group bet 24 is equal to the inverse of the odds on the favorite participant. Thus, in this embodiment, if the favorite participant has 2-5 odds, the group bet 24 will payout at a 5-2 rate.
Betting system interfaces 14 may include any suitable interface between a client 20 and betting system platform 16. For example, as shown in
Track interfaces 26 and/or off-track interfaces 28 may also include one or more self-service betting machines 33. In some embodiment, self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to insert payment into the machine (such as cash or by using a voucher or a credit or debit card), place one or more win bets 22 and/or group bets 24, and receive a printout (such as a ticket, for example) indicating the bet or bets placed. Printouts for winning bets may be inserted into the self-service betting machine, such as to receive a payment voucher (which may be used to receive a payout from a teller 30) or to place additional bets 12. In other embodiments, self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to use a credit or debit card to place bets 12. The credit or debit card may have an associated account, which may be a betting account provided and/or managed by a betting account provider. In some embodiments, after the betting event is completed, a client 20 may insert or swipe his or her credit or debit card in the self-service betting machines 33 in order to update the balance on the card. Self-service betting machines 33 may also allow the client 20 to print out payment vouchers which may be presented to a teller 30 in order to receive payments.
As shown in
Telephone operators 34 may communicate betting information (such as event times, betting rules, betting options and odds, for example) to, and take bets 12 from, clients 20. Similarly, websites 36 may communicate betting information to clients 20 and allow clients 20 to place bets 12. One or more of such websites 36 may be hosted by one or more servers associated with system 10, which server or servers may also host betting system platform 16 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, betting information available to clients 20 via websites 36 may be updated substantially in real time or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as new bets 12 are placed and/or as information regarding the event changes, for example.
In some embodiments, one or more websites 36 may be provided by, or associated with, an Internet betting provider 46, for example. Internet betting provider 46 may provide Internet account wagering by providing online betting accounts to one or more clients 20. Using an online betting account, a client 20 may interface with one or more websites 36 associated with the Internet betting provider 46 in order to fund the account, view betting information regarding betting events, and place bets (such as win bets 22 and/or group bets 24). Such online betting accounts may include one or more various types of accounts, such as deposit accounts, credit accounts, stop-loss accounts, and hybrid accounts, for example.
Some or all of the betting system interfaces 14 of system 10 may be operable to offer or receive both win bets 22 and group bets 24. However, in some embodiments, one or more betting system interfaces 14 may only offer or receive either win bets 22 or group bets 24. For example, in a particular embodiment, a website 36 may allow clients 20 to place both win bets 22 and group bets 24, while a particular OTB parlor 28 may only allow clients 20 to place win bets 22.
As discussed above, betting system platform 16 is operable to receive bets 12 (including both win bets 22 and group bets 24) from betting system interfaces 14, store the received bets 12, determine appropriate odds and payouts, and communicate such odds and payouts to one or more of the betting system interfaces 14, which may then display such odds and/or payouts to clients 20. As shown in
As discussed above, betting system platform 16 comprises processor 38 and memory 40. Processor 38 may comprise any suitable processor that executes a betting system software application 42 or other computer instructions, such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other microprocessor, and may include any suitable number of processors working together. Memory 40 may comprise one or more memory devices suitable to facilitate execution of the computer instructions, such as one or more random access memories (RAMs), read-only memories (ROMs), dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), fast cycle RAMs (FCRAMs), static RAM (SRAMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), microcontrollers, or microprocessors.
Memory 40 is generally operable to store various information that may be used by processor 38 in determining odds and/or payouts. For example, memory 40 may comprise any suitable number of databases, which may be co-located or physically and/or geographically distributed. In the example shown in
As discussed above, one or more communications networks 18 couple and facilitate wireless or wireline communication between one or more betting system interfaces 14 and betting system platform 16. Each communication network 18 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links. In general, each communication network 18 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
As discussed above, processor 38 is operable to execute betting system software application 42 to determine current odds data 50, such as current pool data 52, current odds data 54 and/or potential payout data 56, shown in
As shown in
As discussed above, processor 38 may calculate various current odds data 50 using various algorithms or equations.
As discussed above,
The AC group bet pool equation 100 may be used to determine the after-commission group bet pool, which is equal to the before-commission (BC) group bet pool minus the take-out. In some embodiments, the take-out is a percentage of each bet 12, and the total take-out for an event is thus that percentage of the total pool. For example, if the take-out rate is 15%, the take-out on each win bet 22 or group bet 24 is equal to 15% of such win bet 22 or group bet 24, and the total take-out for the event is 15% of the total pool for the event. However, it should be understood that in alternative embodiments, the take-out (commission) may be otherwise calculated. For example, a separate take-out rate may be charged for win bets 22 and group bets 24.
The participant's AC win bet stake equation 102 may be used to determine the total AC win bet stake on each participant in the event. According to equation 102, the AC win bet stake on each participant is equal to the BC win bet stake on that participant minus the take-out.
The total AC win bet stake equation 104 may be used to determine the total AC win bet stake on all participants, which equals the sum of the AC win bet stake on each participant (as determined using equation 102).
The AC group-participant win bet pool equation 106 may be used to determine the total AC stake of win bets 22 on each participant in the group, or subset, of participants covered by the group bet 24. The participants in the group of participants covered by the group bet 24 may be referred to as the “grouped participants.” For example, in a 5 horse race in which Horse #4 is the favorite and a group bet covers Horses #1, 2, 3 and 5, the group-participant win bet pool equation 106 may be used to determine the total AC stake of win bets 22 placed on Horses #1, 2, 3 and 5.
The total AC pool on all participants equation 108 may be used to determine the total AC pool, including the total pool of back bets 22 and group bets 24. According to equation 108, the total AC pool is the sum of the total AC win bet stake (as determined by equation 104) and the AC group bet pool (as determined by equation 100).
The AC group bet pool allocation equation 110 may be used to determine the allocation of the AC group bet pool among each of the grouped participants. According to equation 110, the AC group bet pool (as determined using equation 100) is allocated among the grouped participants in direct proportion to the stake of AC win bets 22 placed on each of the grouped participants (as determined using equation 102).
The participant's total AC stake equation 112 may be used to determine the total AC stake on each participant in an event. According to equation 112, the total AC stake on each participant is the sum of the AC win bet stake on that participant (as determined using equation 102) and the portion of the AC group bet pool allocated to that participant (as determined using equation 110).
Each of the alternative total AC group bet payout equations, 114A and 114B, may be used to determine the potential total AC payout for the AC group bet pool if each participant were to win the event. According to equation 114A, the total AC group bet payout for each particular participant is based on the total AC stake on all participants except for the particular participant (as determined using equation 112), the total AC stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 112), and the portion of the AC group bet pool allocated to the particular participant (as determined using equation 110). According to equation 114B, the total AC group bet payout for each particular participant is based on the total AC pool on all participants (as determined using equation 108), the portion of the AC group bet pool allocated to the particular participant (as determined using equation 110), and the total AC stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 112).
It should be understood that using the equations shown in
The total AC group bet profit equation 116 may be used to determine the potential total AC profit on the AC group bet pool if each participant were to win the event. According to equation 116, the total AC group bet profit is equal to the total AC group bet payout (as determined using equation 114) minus the total BC group bet pool.
Each of the alternative AC payout per group bet unit currency equations, 118A and 118B, may be used to determine the potential AC payout per unit of currency (such as one dollar, one pound, or other unit of currency) wagered on group bet 24 if the group bet 24 were to win. For example, equations 118A and/or 118B may be used to determine the potential AC payout per dollar wagered on group bet 24.
According to equation 118A, the potential AC payout per unit currency for each group bet 24 is based on the BC group bet pool and the total AC group bet payout (as determined using equation 114). According to equation 118B, the potential AC payout per unit currency for each group bet 24 is based on the total AC pool on all participants (as determined using equation 108), the total AC stake on a particular participant (as determined using equation 112), the portion of the AC group bet pool allocated to the particular participant (as determined using equation 110), and the AC group bet pool (as determined using equation 100).
Each of the alternative total AC win bet payout equations 120 may be used to determine the potential total AC payout for the total AC win bet stake on each particular participant if that participant were to win the event. According to equation 120A, the total AC win bet payout for each particular participant is based on the total AC stake on all participants except for the particular participant (as determined using equation 112), the total AC stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 112), and the AC win bet stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 102). According to equation 120B, the total AC win bet payout for each particular participant is based on the total AC pool on all participants (as determined using equation 108), the AC win bet stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 102), and the total AC stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 112).
The total AC win bet profit equation 122 may be used to determine the potential total AC profit on the total win bet stake on each particular participant if that participant were to win the event. According to equation 122, the potential AC profit on the total win bet stake on each participant is equal to the potential total AC win bet payout for that participant (as determined using equation 120) minus the total BC win bet stake on that participant.
Each of the alternative AC payout per win bet unit currency equations 124 may be used to determine the potential AC payout per unit of currency (such as one dollar, one pound, or other unit of currency) wagered on each win bet 22 if that win bet 22 were to win. For example, equations 124A and/or 124B may be used to determine the potential payout per dollar wagered on each winning win bet 22.
According to equation 124A, the potential AC payout per unit currency for each win bet 22 on a particular participant is based on the total BC win bet stake for that participant and the potential AC total win bet payout for that participant (as determined using equation 120). According to equation 124B, the potential AC payout per unit currency for each win bet 22 on a particular participant is based on the total AC pool on all participants (as determined using equation 108) and the total BC stake on the particular participant (as determined using equation 138, shown in
As discussed above,
Each of
Payout table 200A includes various payouts and profits as calculated before-commission (BC), as indicated by row 206A, and after-commission (AC), as indicated by row 204A. A take-out rate of 15% is used in this example. However, it should be understood that any suitable take-out rate may be used. For each case, BC and AC, payout table 200A indicates the take-out rate 208A; the total stake on all horses, 210A; the total stake on Horse #1, 212A; the total win bet payout if Horse #1 were to win, 214A; the payout per win bet unit currency if Horse #1 were to win, 216A; the total win bet profit if Horse #1 were to win, 218A; the total group bet payout if Horse #1 were to win, 220A; the payout per group bet unit currency if Horse #1 were to win, 222A; and the total group bet profit if Horse #1 were to win, 224A.
Stakes table 202 includes a before-commission (BC) section 250 and an after-commission (AC) section 252. BC section 250 indicates example current BC win bet stakes 254 on each horse, a current BC total of win bets on all horses 256, a BC group-participant win bet pool 258, an example current BC group bet pool 260, and the BC allocation of the group bet pool, indicated by reference number 262. AC section 252 indicates example current AC win bet stakes 270 on each horse, a current total of win bets on all horses 272, an AC group-participant win bet pool 274, an example current AC group bet pool 276, and the allocation of the AC group bet pool, indicated by reference number 278.
Various data within BC section 250 and AC section 252 may be determined using one or more calculations shown in
Regarding AC section 252, the current AC win bet stakes 270 on each horse may be determined using equation 102; the current AC total of win bets on all horses 272 may be determined using equation 104; the AC group-participant win bet pool 274 may be determined using equation 106; the current AC group bet pool 276 may be determined using equation 100; and the allocation of the AC group bet pool, indicated as 278, may be determined using equation 110.
In addition, as discussed above, the payouts and profits shown in payout table 200A may be determined based on stakes table 202 using one or more calculations shown in
Similarly, the various payouts and profits calculated without or before take-out, as indicated along row 206A, may be determined using one or more calculations shown in
In this manner, the various payouts and profits included in payout table 200A may be determined for situations both with and without take-out. As discussed above, the various payouts and profits included in payout table 200A are relevant in the event that Horse #1 wins the race.
In view of
Each win bet 22 or group bet 24 received at steps 200 and/or 302 may be stored at step 304, such as within memory 40, for example. A take-out (commission) rate may be applied to each received win bet 22 and group bet 24 at step 306, such as described above with reference to
At step 308, each received group bet 24 may be divided and allocated among all participants covered by the group bet 24, or all grouped participants, such that the potential payout for the group bet 24 is related to the odds on the favorite participant, such as described above with reference to
At step 310, various odds, payouts and/or profits for some or all received and/or stored win bets 22, such as various current odds 50 or various payouts and profits shown in
At step 312, various odds, payouts and/or profits for some or all received and/or stored group bets 24, such as various current odds 50 or various payouts and profits shown in
At least portions of steps 310 and 312 may be performed simultaneously. In addition, in some embodiments, steps 310 and 312 are performed in real time, substantially in real time, or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as win bets 22 and/or group bets 24 are received by betting system platform 16.
At step 314, it is determined whether the betting pool is closed. In some embodiments, the betting pool, which includes all bets on the event to be considered in the final determination of payouts, may be closed substantially at the time of or after betting is closed on the event. For example, in some embodiments, bets which are made prior to the close of betting but are processed (at least partially) after the close of betting (such as due to processing and transmission delays, for example) may be included within the betting pool.
If the betting pool is still open, the method may return to steps 300 through 312 to receive and store additional win bets 22 and/or group bets 24, and to recalculate the current odds, payouts and/or profits. In this manner, betting system platform 16 may update the current odds, payouts and/or profits associated with the various bets 12 associated with the event. In some embodiments, betting system platform 16 may perform such updates continuously and/or in real time, substantially in real time, or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example).
Thus, it should be understood that each time the method returns to steps 300 through 312 while the betting pool remains open, the allocation of the group bet pool is recalculated at step 308 for newly received win bets 22 and/or group bets 24. In this manner, the allocation of the group bet pool may be continuously (or at preset intervals) updated in order to provide the appropriate win bet and group bet payouts (which are determined at steps 310 and 312, respectively.)
If it is determined at step 314 that the betting pool is closed, the method proceeds to step 316. At step 316, it is determined whether any of the participants in the event will not be competing in the event, such as if a participant is scratched, withdrawn, or becomes a non-runner, for example. For example, betting system platform 16 may receive a notification that one or more of the participants has been withdrawn from the event prior to the start of the event. If it is determined at step 316 that one or more participants will not be competing in the event, the method may return to step 308 to recalculate the allocation of the group bet pool based on the updated set of participants in the event. Otherwise, the method may proceed to step 318. In an alternative embodiment, if it is determined at step 316 that one or more participants will not be competing in the event, all group bets 24 may be cancelled, and refunds may be issued for such group bets 24. It should be understood that step 318 may be performed before, after, or both before and after step 314.
At step 318, the results of the event are received, such as the final position of each participant in the event and whether there was a tie for any position, for example. At step 320, win bet payouts may be distributed to clients 20 who made win bets 22 on the winning participant. For example, assuming in the example discussed above that Horse #1 won the race, win bet payouts may be distributed to clients 20 who made win bets 22 on Horse #1, which payouts may be based on payouts determined at step 310, such as payout per win bet unit currency if Horse #1 were to win, 216A, for example. In some embodiments, win bet payouts may be distributed according to the final determination of win bet payouts made at step 310. In alternative embodiments, win bet payouts may be distributed according to a final determination of win bet payouts made after the betting closed or even after the event was completed.
At step 322, group bet payouts may be distributed to clients 20 who made winning group bets 24. For example, assuming in the example discussed above that Horse #1 won the race, the group bet 24 is a winning bet, and thus group bet payouts may be distributed to all clients 20 who wagered on the group bet 24. Such group bet payouts may be based on payouts determined at step 312, such as payout per group bet unit currency if Horse #1 were to win, 222A, for example. In some embodiments, group bet payouts may be distributed according to the final determination of group bet payouts made at step 312. In alternative embodiments, group bet payouts may be distributed according to a final determination of group bet payouts made after the betting closed or even after the event was completed. In some situations, steps 320 and 322 may be occur simultaneously, or may at least partially overlap.
At step 342, the total after-commission (AC) stake on all non-selected participants is determined. For example, equation 112 shown in
At step 344, the total AC stake on the selected participant is determined, such as using equation 112 shown in
At step 348, the total AC win bet payout for the selected participant is determined, such as using either equation 120A or 120B shown in
At step 350, the AC payout per win bet unit currency for the selected participant is determined, such as using either equation 124A or 124B shown in
At step 352, it is determined whether there are any more participants in the set of participants in the event. If so, the method returns to repeat steps 340 through 350 for each remaining participant. If not, the method ends. For example, in the example discussed above, 340 through 350 are repeated for Horses #2, 3, 4 and 5 to determine the payouts for win bets 22 made on each of the Horses #2, 3, 4 and 5.
At step 362, the total after-commission (AC) stake on all non-selected participants is determined. For example, equation 112 shown in
At step 364, the total AC stake on the selected participant is determined, such as using equation 112 shown in
At step 368, the total AC group bet payout if the selected participant were to win the event is determined, such as using either equation 114A or 114B shown in
At step 370, the AC payout per group bet unit currency for the selected participant is determined, such as using either equation 118A or 118B shown in
At step 372, it is determined whether there are any more participants in the set of participants in the event. If so, the method returns to repeat steps 360 through 370 for each remaining participant. If not, the method ends. For example, in the example discussed above, 360 through 370 are repeated for Horses #2, 3, 4 and 5 to determine the payouts for group bets 24 if each of the Horses #2, 3, 4 and 5 were to win the race.
It should be understood that in various embodiments, the steps of the methods shown in
Although embodiments of the invention and their advantages are described in detail, a person skilled in the art could make various alterations, additions, and omissions without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/453,769 filed Jun. 3, 2003, entitled “System and Method for Betting on a Subset of Participants in an Event,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/460,595 filed Apr. 3, 2003, entitled “System and Method for Betting on a Subset of Participants in an Event.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3909002 | Levy | Sep 1975 | A |
4874177 | Girardin | Oct 1989 | A |
4962950 | Champion | Oct 1990 | A |
5275400 | Weingardt et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5374060 | Goldberg | Dec 1994 | A |
5452899 | Skratulia et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5573244 | Mindes | Nov 1996 | A |
5586937 | Menashe | Dec 1996 | A |
5672106 | Orford et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5687968 | Tarantino | Nov 1997 | A |
5713793 | Holte | Feb 1998 | A |
5741181 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743525 | Haddad | Apr 1998 | A |
5749785 | Rossides | May 1998 | A |
RE35864 | Weingardt et al. | Jul 1998 | E |
5830068 | Brenner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839726 | Luise | Nov 1998 | A |
5842921 | Mindes et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888136 | Herbert | Mar 1999 | A |
5957775 | Cherry | Sep 1999 | A |
5984779 | Bridgeman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004211 | Brenner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6113492 | Walker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120376 | Cherry | Sep 2000 | A |
6126543 | Friedman | Oct 2000 | A |
6152822 | Herbert | Nov 2000 | A |
6210275 | Olsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6287199 | McKeown et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296569 | Congello, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309307 | Lrause et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325721 | Miyamoto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331148 | Krause et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354592 | Virzi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358150 | Mir et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383074 | Boggs | May 2002 | B1 |
6450887 | Mir et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6527270 | Maksymec et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554708 | Brenner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6688978 | Herman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695701 | Aronson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712701 | Boylan, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722980 | Stronach | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6786824 | Cannon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6811483 | Webb et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6837789 | Garahi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837791 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6926607 | Slomiany et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929550 | Hisada | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7147557 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7201658 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7311606 | Amaitis et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7351149 | Simon et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
8905832 | Miller | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010031656 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039209 | DeWeese et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041612 | Garahi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047291 | Garahi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051540 | Hindman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020049975 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077712 | Safaei et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094853 | Hayashi | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020115488 | Berry et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020149152 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177483 | Cannon | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030054870 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030096646 | Zhu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119582 | Ocampo | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125822 | LaNeve | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157976 | Simon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030212623 | Aylmer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004656 | Sambongi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006484 | Manis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039461 | Stefani | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048656 | Krynicky | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063484 | Dreaper et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104845 | McCarthy | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111358 | Lange et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040192437 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193469 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193531 | Amaitis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198483 | Amaitis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204245 | Amaitis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229671 | Stronach et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235542 | Stronach et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050032565 | Cheng | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044575 | Kuyl et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049731 | Dell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102223 | Vlazny et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107151 | Amaitis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107153 | Jubinville et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116410 | Vlazny et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148379 | Huard et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170886 | Miller | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176495 | Stronach | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176496 | Stronach | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176499 | Stronach | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181862 | Asher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181868 | Vlazny et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187000 | Miller | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050227757 | Simon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060009281 | Stronach | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060068874 | Hornik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073870 | Cannon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060135252 | Amaitis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060214376 | Weller | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070026939 | Asher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070026940 | Cannella | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070184890 | Ollington | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080113816 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080248850 | Schugar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090088232 | Amaitis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100331066 | Jung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120034961 | Berman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140141850 | Miller | May 2014 | A1 |
20140235305 | Asher et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150248816 | Miller | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279164 | Miller | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004297887 | Jun 2005 | AU |
2478180 | Mar 2003 | CA |
2521159 | Nov 2004 | CA |
2547447 | Dec 2004 | CA |
0 217 984 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 625 760 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 848 846 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 104 686 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 288 820 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 319 428 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 442 773 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 574 447 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2 180 675 | Apr 1987 | GB |
2 299 425 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2 356 353 | May 2001 | GB |
2 377 055 | Dec 2002 | GB |
2 380 687 | Apr 2003 | GB |
2 384 097 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2 387 009 | Oct 2003 | GB |
2 388 928 | Nov 2003 | GB |
2 400 202 | Oct 2004 | GB |
H9-511593 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-320483 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H10-320483 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H11-184937 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-003405 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2001-202467 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-117427 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-177630 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003-530174 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2005-513593 | May 2005 | JP |
2008-525900 | Jul 2008 | JP |
516935 | Aug 2003 | NZ |
WO 9522883 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9804991 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9901192 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9930788 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0000256 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0022908 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0067215 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0079442 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0164305 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0165507 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0165508 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0168204 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0173649 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0177861 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0177861 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0177964 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02101673 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03004115 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03022378 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03045520 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03046852 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003803 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004097549 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005019986 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005057339 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074617 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005082478 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005086924 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006017877 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2013116359 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patent Pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,279 entitled System and Method for Betting on a Subset of Participants in an Event by Lee M. Amaitis, et al.; 51 total pages, filed Nov. 5, 2004. |
Patent Pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561 entitled System and Method for Betting on a Subset of Participants in an Event According to Multiple Groups by Lee M. Amaitis, et al.; 63 total pages, filed Mar. 9, 2005. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 3, 2003 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis, et al., 20 pages, dated Mar. 14, 2006. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 3, 2003 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis, et al., 10 pages, dated Feb. 2, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office: Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/022,394, filed Dec. 22, 2004 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis, et al., 16 pages, dated Mar. 22, 2007. |
Anthony LeMaire; Horse Racing Betting Odds; http://ezinearticles.com/?Horse-Racing-Betting-Odds&id=125666; 1 page, Retrieved Jan. 4, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 3, 2003 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis; 14 pages, dated Jan. 15, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US06/08695; 9 pages, dated Mar. 24, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561, filed Mar. 9, 2005 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis; 25 pages, dated Mar. 24, 2008. |
Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language; Unabridged; Second Edition; 2 pages, 1978. |
Nags Head Software, Horserace; 3 pages, Mar. 15, 2001. |
Bet with the People Who Know Racing; Racing Daily Forum; 15 pages, Jul. 24, 2001. |
Lance Fortnow, et al.; Betting Boolean-Style: A Framework for Trading in Securities Based on Logical Formulas; 12 pages, Jun. 2003. |
Quote of the Day; Bet of the Day; London Times; 1 page, Jul. 30, 2003. |
The Patent Office Search Report for International Application No. GB0320232.2; 6 pages, Dec. 17, 2003. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 530448; 1 page, dated Sep. 17, 2004. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/26235; 5 pages, dated Apr. 13, 2005. |
Report of Interview from The Patent Office for Great Britain Application No. GB0320232.2; 3 pages, Sep. 28, 2005. |
DICT.org: The DICT Development Group; “To back the field”; http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=*&Query=To+back+the=field; 6 pages, Nov. 24, 2005. |
Chilliman Chili Parlor—Appetizers; The Chili Parlor; Appetizers; A Day at the Races; http://web.archive.org/web/20010305124432/http://chilliman.com/chiliparlor—appetizers.htm; 10 pages, Nov. 25, 2005. |
New Zealand Racing Board: Opposition to New Zealand Patent Application No. 530448 in the Name of Cantor Index LLC; Statement of Case; 12 pages, Nov. 28, 2005. |
Letters Patent for New Zealand Patent No. 530448: 1 page, Mar. 16, 2006. |
Examination Report from The Patent Office for Great Britain Application No. GB0320232.2; 7 pages, dated May 11, 2006. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 539209; 2 pages, dated May 24, 2006. |
Examination Report for New Zealand Patent Application No. 547179; 2 pages, dated May 24, 2006. |
Office Action from The Patent Office for Great Britain Application No. GB0320232.2; 3 pages, dated Dec. 6, 2006. |
European Search Report for Application No. 03816823.3-1238; 3 pages, dated Apr. 17, 2007. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US05/47027; 8 pages, dated Apr. 26, 2007. |
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 3, 2003; 14 pages, dated Jul. 17, 2007. |
Pending Patent Application entitled System and Method for Betting on a Subset of Participants in an Event Wherein Betting Parameters May Change Over Time; by Lee M. Amaitis, et al.; 63 total pages, filed Oct. 30, 2007. |
“NTRA All-Star Jockey Championship Special Wagers”; 3 pages. |
“Wagering Information; Straight or Basic Wagers”; Lone Star Park at Grand Prairie: Player's Guide; http://www.lonestarpark.com/bet—info.asp; 3 pages. |
“Wagering Information; Straight or Basic Wagers”; NTRA.com; http://www.ntra.com/news.asp?type=playthehorses&id=4799; 3 pages. |
“Glossary of Terms”; NTRA.com; http://www.ntra.com/news.asp?type=playthehorses&id=4797; 3 pages. |
“The Basics of Horseplay”; NTRA.com; http://www.ntra.com/news.asp?type=playthehorses&id-4795; 2 pages. |
European Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 03 816 823.3-1238; 4 pages, dated Nov. 19, 2007. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Option of the International Searching Authority, dated Jul. 28, 2005, International Application No. PCT/US05/06314 (10 pp.). |
Scarne, John, “Scarne's New Complete Guide to Gambling” (excerpt); Simon & Schuster, 1974, pp. 38-42. |
Notification of Transmittal of the Internal Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 12, 2005, Application No. PCT/US05/03315 (10 pp.). |
Notification of Transmittal of the Internal Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 12, 2005, Application No. PCT/US05/03292 (10 pp.). |
Scarne, John, “Scarne's New Complete Guide to Gambling” (excerpt); Simon & Schuster, 1974, pp. 32-55. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, filed Feb. 3, 2004 in the name of Kenneth L. Miller, dated Aug. 17, 2007 (10 pp.). |
Internet Archive Wayback Machine: “TAB New Zealand's Betting Agency”, http://web.archive.org/web/19980623064154/http//www.tab.co.nz/; Jun. 23, 1998 (15 pp.). |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 549700, dated May 23, 2007 (3 pp.). |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 549121, dated May 17, 2007 (2 pp.). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Jul. 11, 2007 (15 pgs). |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 19, 2007, Application No. EP05712675 (3 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Sep. 9, 2005 (9 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Mar. 8, 2006 (12 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Dec. 27, 2006 (6 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Aug. 17, 2007 (7 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Nov. 1, 2007 (3 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Jan. 28, 2008 (8 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, dated Jul. 14, 2005 (9 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, dated Feb. 14, 2007 (11 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, dated May 10, 2007 (2 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, dated Jan. 30, 2008 (11 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Jun. 30, 2005 (6 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Jan. 10, 2006 (11 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Apr. 19, 2006 (3 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Jan. 8, 2007 (12 pgs). |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 549116, dated Jul. 31, 2008 (2 pgs.). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, dated Sep. 3, 2008 (12 pgs). |
Internet Archive Wayback Machine: “TAB New Zealand's Betting Agency”, <http://web.archive.org/web/20031004035004/http://tab.co.nz/>; Oct. 4, 2003 (1 pg.). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Sep. 5, 2008 (8 pgs). |
Wonderland Greyhound Park, “Wonderland Wagering Guide,” retrieved from Internet (Aug. 29, 2008) dated Apr. 3, 2002 and Dec. 11, 2002, from Internet URL <http://web.archive.org/web/20021211160142/http://wonderlandgreyhound.com/wagering.html> (9 pgs). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, dated Mar. 11, 2008 (10 pgs). |
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 05723963.4, dated May 2, 2008 (5 pgs). |
European Patent Office, Office Action for Application No. 05712675.7 dated Feb. 21, 2008 (5 pgs). |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 549121, dated Mar. 14, 2008 (2 pp.). |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 549700, dated Mar. 14, 2008 (2 pp.). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, filed Feb. 3, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076, filed Feb. 3, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353, filed Feb. 23, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 6, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/022,394, filed Dec. 22, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,613, filed Jul. 26, 2005. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,279, 16 pages; dated Dec. 24, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561; 11 pages; dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,613; dated Apr. 30, 2008. |
PCT Search report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US06/28140; 8 pages; dated Feb. 20, 2007. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Nov. 12, 2008 (12 pgs). |
Notice of Opposition for New Zealand Patent No. 549121; 5 pages; Dec. 23, 2008. |
Amended Notice of Opposition for NZ Patent Application No. 549121; 4 pages; Mar. 3, 2009. |
“How to Play”; accessed Mar. 24, 2009 at http://web.archive.org/web/19980623064856/www.tab.co.nz/4—how—to—play/4—f—how—to.html. |
“Thoroughbred Times”, accessed Mar. 24, 2009 at http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/national-news/2004/January/15/magna-institutes-pick-five-wager.aspx. |
“Majorwager.com” accessed Mar. 24, 2009 at http://www.majorwager.com/forums/race-track/139617-magna-pick-5-fails-make-500k-pool.html. |
Los Angeles Times, “Magna 5 might be the Ticket”, accessed Mar. 24, 2009 at http://articles.latimes.com/2004/jan/31/sports/sp-insider31. |
“Your Multi Tab” Brochure, accessed Mar. 24, 2009 at http:web.archive.org/web/20031219010102/www.tab.co.nz/Multi/tab-multi-brochure.pdf. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,613; 8 pages; dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
California Regulatory Notice Register, Title 4. California Horse Racing Board, Aug. 29, 2003. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/022,394, filed Dec. 22, 2004 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis; 7 pages, dated Aug. 10, 2007. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,279, filed Nov. 5, 2004 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis; 18 pages, dated Jun. 13, 2008. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand; Examination Report for Application No. 539209; 4 pages, dated Jul. 31, 2008. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769, filed Jun. 3, 2003 in the name of Lee M. Amaitis; 10 pages, dated Aug. 8, 2008. |
New Zealand Patent Application No. 333267 entitled Sporting Event Wagering System; Abandoned by Applicant on Jun. 13, 2000; 2 pages, Filed Dec. 9, 1998. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand; Examination Report for Patent Application No. 547179; 4 pages, dated Aug. 28, 2008. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand; Examination Report for Patent Application No. 539209; 1 page, dated Sep. 4, 2008. |
AU Examiners Report for AU Application No. 2006220536; dated Sep. 29, 2010; 3 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 556076; dated Dec. 17, 2010 2 pages. |
JP Office Action for Application No. 2007-548577 dated Jan. 4, 2011; 6 pages (includes English Translation). |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2005216980 dated Mar. 16, 2011; 3 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2006276086 dated Mar. 31, 2011; 3 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 592115; dated Apr. 12, 2011; 2 pages. |
EP Search Report for Application No. 05855562.4 dated May 24, 2011; 7 pages. |
JP Office Action for Application No. 2008-500985 dated Jun. 7, 2011; 12 pages (includes English Translation). |
JP Office Action for Application No. 2007-548577 dated Aug. 2, 2011; 8 pages (includes English Translation). |
CA Office Action for Application No. 2616157; 4 pages; dated Aug. 29, 2011. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 594811; dated Aug. 29, 2011; 3 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 594872; 2 pages; dated Sep. 1, 2011. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,649; dated Sep. 26, 2011; 36 pages. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,905; dated Mar. 1, 2012; 10 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report for Application No. 06800146.0; Mar. 29, 2012; 6 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance for AU Application No. 2005318970; 3 pages; Mar. 27, 2012. |
JP Office Action for Application No. 2008-500985 dated Apr. 24, 2012; 6 pages (includes English Translation). |
European Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application for Application No. 05712675.7; Dated Sep. 17, 2012 (12 pgs). |
AU Examiners Report for AU Application No. 2011203086; dated Mar. 21, 2012; 2 pages. |
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,649; dated Oct. 3, 2012; 5 pages. |
EP Office Action for Application No. 05855562.4 dated Mar. 14, 2012; 5 pages. |
NZ Examination Report, dated Oct. 9, 2012 for New Zealand App'l No. 602822; 2 pages. |
NZ Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 592115; dated Oct. 9, 2012; 1 page. |
CA Office Action, dated Jul. 5, 2012 for Canadian App'l No. 2,599,952; 4 pages. |
EP Extended Search Report for Application No. 06737833.1 dated Mar. 29, 2012; 6 pages. |
CA Office Action for Application No. 2521159; 2 pages; dated Jun. 27, 2012. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 592189; dated Oct. 12, 2012 2 pages. |
NZ Examination Report and Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 592189; dated Nov. 6, 2012 2 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 594872; dated Feb. 27, 2013; 2 pages. |
NZ Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 594872; dated Mar. 11, 2013; 1 page. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 607500; dated Feb. 27, 2013; 2 pages. |
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,649; dated Jan. 11, 2013; 8 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for Application No. 2,592,038; dated Feb. 7, 2013; 3 pages. |
NZ Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 594811; dated Jan. 28, 2013; 1 page. |
NZ Examination Report for Application No. 605849; dated Jan. 18, 2013; 2 pages. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,905; dated Jan. 4, 2013; 6 pages. |
AU Examination Report for Application No. 2011203580; dated Feb. 19, 2013; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/983,279; dated Apr. 2, 2013; 12 pages. |
EP Communication for EP App. No. 05855532.4; dated Mar. 28, 2013; 7 pages. |
JP Office Action for JP App. No. 2012-158666; dated Jul. 9, 2013; 9 pages (w/English translation). |
CA Examiners Report for CA App. No. 2,599,952; dated Mar. 28, 2013; 4 pages. |
EP Communication for EP App. No. 06737833.1; dated Jun. 4, 2013; 6 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for CA App. No. 2,521,159; dated Apr. 3, 2013; 2 pages. |
US Decision on Appeal for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221; Mar. 29, 2013; 10 pages. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076; dated Apr. 26, 2013; 19 pages. |
US Final Office Action for Application No. 12/776,905; dated Apr. 26, 2013; 10 pages. |
JP Office Action for JP App. No. 2013-7077; dated Jul. 30, 2013; 8 pages (w/English translation). |
AU Patent Examination Report for AU App. No. 2012201633; dated Sep. 25, 2013; 3 pages. |
AU Patent Examination Report for AU App. No. 2011205156; dated Oct. 1, 2013; 2 pages. |
AU Patent Examination Report for AU App. No. 2012203799; dated Nov. 29, 2013; 4 pages. |
US Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076; dated Dec. 2, 2013; 17 pages. |
EP Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for App. No. 06800146.0; dated Nov. 12, 2013; 5 pages. |
CA Examination Report for CA App. No. 2,522,236; dated Feb. 12, 2014; 5 pages. |
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,905; dated Dec. 13, 2013; 14 pages. |
US Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221; dated Aug. 19, 2013; 11 pages. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561; dated May 15, 2014; 2 pages. |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2013-086561; dated Apr. 22, 2014; 6 pages (w/English translation). |
AU Examination Report for App. No. 2011211332; dated Mar. 5, 2014; 4 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for App. No. 623711; dated Apr. 16, 2014; 2 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. 05712661.7; 3 pages; dated Aug. 11, 2009. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/784,353; 13 pages; dated Jun. 3, 2009. |
Invendium Ltd., Online Betting Guide (OLBG) Betting School, 2202-2009, retrieved from Internet www.online-betting-guide.co.uk on May 19, 2009 from URL<http://www.online-betting-guide.co.uk/school/horse—racing—bets.php>. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769; 12 pages; dated Aug. 4, 2009. |
Beyer, Andrew, The Winning Horseplayer, 1994, 138-139. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand Examination Report for Patent Application No. 565411, dated Oct. 23, 2009 (3 pgs.). |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561; 29 pages; dated Oct. 19, 2009. |
U.S. PTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/453,769; 3 pages; dated Dec. 6, 2009. |
CA Examination Report for CA App. No. 2,616,157; dated Jun. 4, 2014; 3 pages. |
U.S. PTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/076,561; dated Jul. 10, 2014; 9 pages. |
Canadian Examiner's Requisition for App. No. 2,592,038; dated Sep. 30, 2014; 4 pages. |
Canadian Examiner's Requisition for App. No. 2,599,952; dated Dec. 8, 2014; 6 pages. |
NZ First Examination Report for App. No. 627644; dated Jul. 29, 2014; 2 pages. |
Canadian Examiner's Requisition for App. No. 2,521,159; dated Jan. 9, 2015; 5 pages. |
NZ First Examination Report for App. No. 629452; dated Aug. 27, 2014; 2 pages. |
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1 for App. No. 2013209388; dated Aug. 14, 2014; 2 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2013/023880 dated Jun. 17, 2013 (15 pages). |
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1 for App. No. 2013231139; dated May 25, 2015; 2 pages. |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2013-7077; dated Apr. 7, 2015; 10 pages (w/English translation). |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2013-086561; dated Mar. 24, 2015; 8 pages (w/English translation). |
CA Examiners Requisition for App. No. 2,522,236; Apr. 7, 2015; 6 pages. |
CA Examiners Requisition for App. No. 2,616,157; dated May 8, 2015; 4 pages. |
EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for App. No. 06800146.0; Feb. 17, 2015; 4 pages. |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,076; dated Dec. 22, 2011; 17 pages. |
USPTO Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, filed May 11, 2010; 19 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/771,221, dated Mar. 9, 2009; 4 pages. |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2015-053538 ; dated Mar. 22, 2016; 14 pages (w/English translation). |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2015203598; dated Jun. 28, 2016; 3 pages. |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2015218414; dated Sep. 6, 2016; 3 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for App. No. 2522236; dated Sep. 20, 2016; 6 pages. |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2015203414; dated Nov. 3, 2016; 3 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for App. No. 2521159; dated Nov. 17, 2016; 6 pages. |
JP Notice of Allowance for App. No. 2015-053538 ; dated Nov. 22, 2016; 3 pages. |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2015264800; dated Nov. 29, 2016; 2 pages. |
NZ Notice of Acceptance for App. No. 713379; Mar. 31, 2017; 1 page. |
NZ First Examination Report for App. No. 730158; dated Mar. 30, 2017; 2 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for App. No. 2592038; dated Dec. 28, 2016; 6 pages. |
JP Office Action for App. No. 2013-086561 ; dated Apr. 18, 2017; 8 pages. |
AU SecondExamination Report for App. No. 2015210464; dated May 16, 2017; 3 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for App. No. 2616157; dated May 19, 2017; 6 pages. |
AU Notice of Acceptance for App. No. 2015210464; dated Jun. 1, 2017; 3 pages. |
EP Search Report for Application No. 05855562.4 dated Feb. 25, 2016; 4 pages. |
Canadian Examiner's Requisition for App. No. 2,599,952; WOCA; dated Nov. 17, 2016; 6 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for App. No. 717453; dated Mar. 2, 2016; 1 page. |
AU Examination Report for App. No. 2014262267 ; dated Jan. 13, 2016; 2 pages. |
CA Examiners Report for App. No. 2616157; dated Jun. 8, 2016; 6 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for App. No. 713379; dated Nov. 4, 2015; 2 pages. |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2015203598; dated Jun. 19, 2017; 3 pages. |
AU First Examination Report for App. No. 2016203277; dated Jun. 27, 2017; 3 pages. |
NZ Examination Report for App. No. 732480; dated Jul. 4, 2017; 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080058095 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60460595 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10453769 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11928839 | US |