The present disclosure relates to a closure for a beverage container and particularly to a closure configured to close an open mouth formed in a threaded neck of a beverage container. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a “snap-on, screw-off” closure for the neck of a beverage container.
Milk, juice, and other beverages are dispensed into jugs or containers at a bottling plant. A closure is then mounted on the container neck to close a liquid inlet/outlet opening formed in the container neck. Closures are sized and shaped to mate with container necks to minimize leakage of liquid from a closed container during shipment of filled containers from a bottling plant to a wholesale or retail store.
Some beverage containers, such as one gallon milk or orange juice jugs, are extrusion blow-molded using a polyethylene plastics material. Other beverage containers of the type used to store “sport” drinks are stretch blow-molded using a PET plastics material. In most cases, external threads are formed on the open-mouth necks of these containers to mate with a container closure formed to include mating internal threads.
Container closures are usually made of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and configured to be snapped onto the neck using a capping machine at the bottling plant and screwed on and off the neck by a consumer at home or elsewhere. Such “snap-on, screw-off” style closures often include many fine interior threads with many separate thread leads to enable a bottler to close the open mouth formed in the container neck by applying downward pressure on the closure to “snap” it into place on the neck of a filled container. Nevertheless, a consumer is able to twist and unscrew the threaded closure to remove it from the threaded neck of the container to access the liquid in the container.
In accordance with the present disclosure, a beverage container closure comprises a cap adapted to be coupled to an open-mouth neck of a beverage container and a monolithic cap liner coupled to an interior surface of the cap. The cap liner includes concentric seal rings adapted to engage an annular rim provided on the beverage container neck to establish a sealed connection with the annular rim once the cap is installed on the container neck to close the open mouth formed in the container neck. At least one of the seal rings is splayed relative to the annular rim during installation of the cap on the container neck to form a seal between the cap and the beverage container.
Additional features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
A cap liner 10 is coupled to an inner portion of a cap 12 to provide a beverage container closure 14 as suggested, for example, in
Cap liner 10 includes a mount 26 having a top surface 28 arranged to mate with cap 12 and an opposite bottom surface 30 arranged to support the concentric first and second seal rings 21, 22 as suggested in
Mount 26 of cap liner 10 includes a round inner web 32 and an annular outer web 34 surrounding round inner web 32 as suggested in
First seal ring 21 includes a wide annular base appended to annular outer web 34 of mount 26 and a narrower annular crest 41 positioned to lie in spaced-apart relation to annular outer web 34 as shown in
Second outermost seal ring 22 includes a wide annular base appended to annular outer web 34 of mount 26 and a narrower annular crest 42 positioned to lie in spaced-apart relation to annular outer web 34 as shown in
As shown best in
Various dimensions associated with cap liner 10 are shown in
Cap liner 10 is formed from an elastomeric material with a preferred Shore A durometer hardness of 58±3, although materials with hardness readings ranging from 50 to 65 are suitable. The use of substantially harder materials will impair the reliability of the seal since harder materials may not deform sufficiently which can cause deformation of the cap skirt during forceful tightening (i.e., torquing). The preferred cap liner material is sold under the trade name POLY SEAL 555 by DSChemie, Bremen, Germany. That material is a blend of a natural rubber base, HDPE, EVA for improved adhesion to the cap, and an amide wax for improved performance in cooler temperature ranges. Examples of suitable materials for use in cap liner 10 include synthetic or natural rubber, ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVA), polyethylene teraphthalate, polyvinyl chloride, linear low-density polyethylene, polystyrene, thermoplastic elastomers, and/or soft polypropylene. Optionally, the material may be a laminate of one or more of such compounds of mixtures of one or more of such compounds. The sealing liners typically used for carbonated beverage containers have a Shore A durometer hardness reading between 85 and 95. Accordingly, such sealing liners are not suitable for use in the cap liner disclosed herein.
Cap liner 10 is formed using a compression molding method which includes extrusion of the sealer material onto the center of a cap through a pick-up nozzle. A sensor measures the gram weight of the sealer material extruded and provides a signal to the pick-up nozzle to cease the sealer fluid flow at a predetermined level, typically between 0.440 to 0.460 grams, for a 38 mm opening cap. The cap and the material cools during transportation via conveyor to a compression station. Just prior to compression, the sealer material has cooled to about 215° C. and is semi-solid. A compression punch is then brought down upon the sealer material under high pressure. The compression punch has a profile which is machined to be a mirror image of the cap liner 10 having a plurality of sealing surfaces as described above. The sealing material adheres to cap 12 without use of adhesives or any further addition of heat to cap liner 10 or cap 12. It is within the scope of this disclosure to adhere cap liner 10 to cap 12 so as to cause cap liner 10 to hold fast or stick onto cap 12 by or as if by gluing, suction, grasping, or fusing. In a further quality control step, air pressure of 2 bar is sent over cap 12 and cap liner 10 to ensure the integrity of the bond between cap liner 10 and cap 12. The preferred apparatus for performing this method of forming cap liner 10 is in the KDP50-24 Plastic Liner Molding Machine sold by Oberburg Enbineering AG, Ementalstrasse 137, CH-3414, Oberburg, Switzerland.
It is contemplated that cap liner 10 is appropriate for large-mouthed containers for use with non-carbonated fluids, such as milk or fruit juice. The “double” seal ring configuration of cap liner 10 requires less compression of sealing rings 21, 22 prior to forming a stable seal than single-ridge sealing liners used previously for such containers. This feature provides a lower torque requirement for complete closure and formation of a reliable seal between cap 12 and container neck 16. The reduced compression required to form a seal provided by cap liner 10 also helps prevent an “over-torque” situation since the cap threads of cap 12 are prevented from traveling too far down the length of the neck threads of neck 16 so that they pass or nearly pass the neck threads and can easily jump over them. The lowering of the torque requirement for sealing of closure 14 simplifies the container filling and capping procedure. The broader the range between the amount of torque needed for a reliable seal and the torque that would cause an over-torque situation is defined as the operational range of torque for a capping apparatus. Control of the torque applied to the container in production has been a problem in the past which cap liner 10 overcomes by maximizing the operational torque range. For cap liner 10, the sealing torque is preferably about 8 inch-pounds and varies, for example, between 8 and 10inch-pounds The over-torque failure of the cap is 18 inch pounds and is preferably between 16 and 24 inch-pounds.
It is preferred that first and second seal rings 21, 22 are tapered so that each ring has a wider base portion and a narrower sealing portion (when viewed in cross-section) so that the seal rings initially deform more readily during contact with upwardly facing surface 23 of annular rim 24 of container neck 16 of the lip 70 and then deforms less readily after the initial contact. It is also preferred that the inner first seal ring 21 has a higher crest than the outer second seal ring 22 so that upwardly facing surface 23 of annular rim 24 initially contacts crest 41 and radially outwardly facing surface 44 of the inner first seal ring 21. As a result of this preferred configuration, the inner first seal ring 21 first contacts upwardly facing surface 23 of annular rim 24 and begins to deform inwardly toward the central axis of the container neck 16 and the outer second seal ring 22 next contacts upwardly facing surface 23 of annular rim 24 and is deformed substantially downwardly. The “splayed” deformation of the inner first seal ring 21 is best shown (in slightly exaggerated form) in
Additional cap liner designs are illustrated in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Cap 12 includes a top wall 62 and an annular skirt 64 depending from top wall 62 to form an interior region 66 as shown, for example, in FIGS. 2 and 10-12. Cap 12 also includes a tamper band 68 coupled to annular skirt 64 by means of frangible bridges 69.
In the illustrated embodiment, annular skirt 64 of cap 12 has a total of four threads 70 with four leads 71 formed in the inner surface 72 of annular skirt 64. In this embodiment, the multiple threads and multiple thread leads assist in providing skirt 64 with sufficient flexibility to provide a snap-on/twist-off capability. The multiple threads 70 are preferably sized, angled, and pitched so that they can slide over container neck threads 73 in response to downward axial pressure applied during bottling. A wide variety of numbers of threads having differing length, height, pitch, and angle of opposite faces may be used in skirt 64. Preferably, for snap-on/twist-off skirts, the number of threads is between four and eight, the height of the threads is about 0.027 inch (0.685 mm) and between about 0.025 inch (0.635 mm) to about 0.035 inch (0.889 mm); the pitch of the threads is preferably 0.047 inch (1.193 mm) and varies from about 0.045 (1.143 mm) to about 0.060 (1.524 mm); the angle defined by opposite faces 70a, 70b of the threads 70 is preferably 30° and varies from about 25° to about 40°; and each thread 70 preferably extends circumferentially about 220° around the cylindrical inner surface of annular skirt 64, but may extend circumferentially between 180° and 240°.
Annular skirt 64 is preferably made of high-density polyethylene (HDPE”) material and formed by a conventional injection-molding process. Preferably, the HDPE cap 12 is made from an HDPE resin having a density of about 0.95. It is further contemplated that caps 12 using cap liner 10 may be formed from LDPE, a blend or copolymer of LDPE and HDPE, or other lightweight, inexpensive thermoplastic materials suitable for injection-molding. The use of HDPE material, however, allows the use of a substantially thinner annular wall for annular skirt 64 and therefore requires significantly less material to form than the annular wall of conventional LDPE caps. Annular skirts 64 designed in accordance with the disclosure herein are flexible enough to jump threads during application of downward axial pressure in the course of bottling and have improved resistance to over-torque, “false positive” tamper evidence, as well as deformation during rough handling. The thickness of annular skirt 64 is defined as one-half of the distance between the exterior wall dimension and the thread major dimension and is preferably about 0.027 inch (0.685 mm). This reduction in the thickness of the annular wall 23 results in a cap which may weigh as much as 27% less than a conventional skirt made of LDPE of similar design. The result is an HDPE skirt which preferably weighs as little as 0.73 grams (excluding the weight of the tamper-evident band and sealing liner). In contrast, conventional LDPE cap skirts of similar design typically weighted at least 0.93 grams.
As shown in
As can be best seen in
The exterior and interior diameters of the band 68 are slightly larger than those of annular skirt 64 (other than at the pads 59) to allow the band 68 to fit over the annular rim 24 on the container neck 16. The band 68 has a plurality of ridges 75 formed on its interior surface 76. The ridges 75 have an angled lower surface 77 and a bridge-severing surface 78 extending transversely from the interior surface 50. The lower surface 77 of the ridges 75 are angled to ease passage of the skirt 64 and band 68 over the rim 24 on neck 16 during the application of downward axial pressure on the cap 12 in the course of bottling. The bridge-severing surface 78 of the ridges 75 are designed to engage the rim 24 on the neck 16 of the container 18 when the cap 12 is twisted for removal. The engagement between the bridge-severing surface 78 and rim 24 on the neck 16 as the skirt 64 is lifted and rotated breaks the frangible bridges 69 so that the band 68 is retained on the neck 16 of the container 18. Although bridge-severing surface 78 is shown as being disposed on a series of spaced-apart ridges, it is contemplated that a continuous bridge-severing surface could be provided by use of a continuous rim extending transversely from the interior surface of the band 68, rather than spaced-apart ridges.
In accordance with the disclosure herein, a method is provided to establish a sealed connection between cap 10 and neck 16 of beverage container 18 to close open mouth 20 formed in container neck 16. First and second seal rings 21, 22 included in cap liner 10 are moved downwardly in direction 90 toward annular rim 24 formed in container neck 16 as suggested in
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(c) to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/288,940, filed May 4, 2001, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2752059 | Schneider | Jun 1956 | A |
2768762 | Guinet | Oct 1956 | A |
2901139 | Isele-Aregger | Aug 1959 | A |
3033407 | Isele-Aregger | May 1962 | A |
3051342 | Garcia- Paniagua | Aug 1962 | A |
3074579 | Miller | Jan 1963 | A |
3095991 | Paniagua | Jul 1963 | A |
3195754 | Brockett | Jul 1965 | A |
3215297 | Acton et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3628704 | Corsette | Dec 1971 | A |
4360114 | Owens | Nov 1982 | A |
4379512 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4415096 | Ohmi | Nov 1983 | A |
4429802 | Marks | Feb 1984 | A |
4463863 | Imagawa et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4488676 | Halliday | Dec 1984 | A |
4531649 | Shull | Jul 1985 | A |
4625875 | Carr et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658976 | Pohlenz | Apr 1987 | A |
4658977 | Crisci | Apr 1987 | A |
4667839 | Crisci | May 1987 | A |
4741447 | John | May 1988 | A |
4744481 | Morgan, Jr. | May 1988 | A |
4878589 | Webster et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5042680 | Argudo et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5213224 | Luch | May 1993 | A |
5415306 | Luch et al. | May 1995 | A |
5553727 | Molinaro | Sep 1996 | A |
5762218 | Sachau | Jun 1998 | A |
5769255 | Ohmi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5979690 | Hartley | Nov 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2235186 | Feb 1991 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020162818 A1 | Nov 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60288940 | May 2001 | US |