The present invention pertains to cooling fans mounted to the shafts of electric motors and other similar dynamoelectric devices.
Many dynamoelectric devices, such as appliance motors for dishwashers, clothes washers, and the like, and large industrial motors, utilize a fan mounted on the rotating shaft of the device for cooling a stator, a rotor, a motor housing, and other components of the dynamoelectric device during operation. In one configuration, such a fan is mounted at one axial end of the motor and is configured to pull and/or push air through and/or adjacent the motor housing to cool the components. Such a fan can be mounted within a vented housing, as depicted in
As shown in the exemplary embodiment of
In order to control the direction of the air drawn into the fan, a typical straight blade fan will include a disc-shaped base or backing wall that blocks the flow of air axially through the fan. This feature allows the fan to generate a negative pressure at the center of the rotating fan facing the motor. This negative pressure in turn draws airflow from the opposite axial end of the motor, as represented by the airflow arrows at the right side of the motor housing shown in
One type of radial fan is shown in
Another motor and fan arrangement is illustrated in
One benefit of the straight blade radial fan designs shown in
In order to meet more stringent design requirements, modifications in bi-directional fans (i.e., reversible fans) are continually sought to increase airflow capacity, increase fan/pump efficiency, increase the operating air pressure, and reduce the operating noise of the fan. As dynamoelectric device designs improve, the components operate at increasingly higher temperatures. These increased operating temperatures dictate the need for higher heat dissipation rates to maintain low temperature levels. In some cases, reducing the size of the dynamoelectric device dictates the need for increased air pressure to force air through smaller paths around the operating components. The cooling fan should meet these enhanced requirements without any increase in overall size, and sometimes with a decrease in size to match a decrease in size of the corresponding dynamoelectric device.
Moreover, noise reduction is often important, especially for dynamoelectric devices used in consumer appliances, such as dishwashers and clothes washers, as well as large industrial motors operating within specifications (e.g., operator health specifications). For example, noise levels above 85 dBA are undesirable in consumer appliances. Lower noise can provide a selling point for an appliance. Since the cooling fan can be the primary noise generator in these appliances, the focus for noise abatement is necessarily directed at the fan.
In accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, it has been found that incorporating splitter vanes between the straight blades of a radial flow, bi-directional fan is advantageous. In particular, the addition of splitter vanes increases air pressure through the cooling device, improves the flow efficiency by reducing recirculation areas between blades, and reduces operating noise.
In one embodiment, a radial fan comprises a base defining a central hub for engagement to a source of rotation about an axis of rotation. A plurality of primary blades are connected to the base which are radially oriented and spaced around the circumference of said base. Each primary blade has an outer edge that can be substantially flush with an outer edge of said base plate and an inner edge that terminates adjacent the central hub. The outer and inner edges may extend generally parallel to the axis of rotation. Each primary blade has a primary length from the outer edge to the inner edge.
In one feature, a plurality of splitter vanes are connected to the base and are interspersed the primary blades. Each splitter vane has a vane outer edge that may be substantially flush with the outer edge of the base plate and a vane inner edge that terminates radially outboard of the inner edge of each of the primary blades, and is thus radially offset from the central hub of the base. Each splitter vane may have a vane length from the vane outer edge to the vane inner edge that is about 50-70% of the primary length of the primary blades.
The inner edge of each splitter vane is arranged at an angle relative to the base of the vane. In certain embodiments, the inner edge is at an angle of about 60°-70° relative to the vane base. This angle, combined with the shorter length of the splitter vanes increases flow capacity of the fan without any appreciable increase in operating noise. Moreover, the arrangement of the inner edge of the splitter vanes reduces the occurrence of recirculation and vortices of the airflow at the inlet region between primary blades.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and described in the following written specification. It is understood that no limitation to the scope of the invention is thereby intended. It is further understood that the present invention includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments and includes further applications of the principles of the invention as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a radial fan 10 is provided as shown in
The fan 10 includes a plurality of planar primary blades 15 projecting radially outwardly from and extending perpendicular to the base plate 12. The primary blades 15 are oriented radially and extend from proximate the hub 14 to or near an outer rim 13 of the base plate 12. The radially outward edges 16 of the blades may be generally flush with the outer rim 13. In the illustrated embodiment, upper edges 17 of the blades 15 are substantially parallel to the base plate 12. In certain embodiments, portions 17a of each of the upper edges approaching the hub 14 may extend perpendicular to a rotational axis of the fan 10, rather than substantially parallel to the base plate 12. This feature reduces the axial length of the fan without appreciable impact on the flow capacity of the fan. Thus, as illustrated in
In accordance with one feature of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a plurality of splitter vanes 20 are interspersed among the primary blades 15. As shown in
As thus far described, each splitter vane 20 is substantially similar in construction to each of the blades 15. But as illustrated in
The addition of a like number of splitter vanes 20 to the plurality of blades 15 increases the total air pressure generated by the fan 10 due to the commensurate increase in blade/vane surface area adding energy to the air as the fan 10 rotates. But because the splitter vanes 20 are radially shorter than the primary blades 15, the splitter vanes operate more quietly than the primary blades. Thus, in one example, the combination of the seven primary blades 15 with seven splitter vanes 20 produces an air pressure and an air flow that is substantially similar to the air flow of a fan with fourteen primary blades, but with significantly less noise. Put in other terms, a fan having seven blades can provide increased airflow with the addition of seven splitter vanes without any appreciable increase in fan noise.
In some embodiments it may be desirable to include more than one splitter vane between successive primary blades. Thus, in a specific embodiment, two splitter vanes may be uniformly placed between successive pairs of primary blades, provided there is sufficient circumferential space between the primary blades, particularly at the inboard edges of the splitter vanes.
The splitter vanes 20 also improve the radial airflow efficiency of the fan. In a typical seven blade fan (such as the fan in
An exemplary embodiment of the splitter vane 20 is shown in the planar view of
As shown in
In a specific embodiment, the vane 20 has a height of about 11.5 cm, which is comparable to the height of the straight radial blades 15. The inner edge 28 extends at an angle A of about 65° while the outboard edge 26 extends at an angle B of about 80° relative to the base 22. For a standard 16″ fan, the base 22 may have a length of about 13 cm, as compared to the length of the primary blade of about 17.5 cm. The length of the upper edge 24 is about 5 cm, as compared with the 17.5 cm length of the upper edge of the primary blade. In the exemplary embodiment, the splitter vanes and straight blades preferably have the same height. Preferably the dimensions of the splitter vanes are increased or decreased commensurately for larger or smaller fans, preferably maintaining the radial length L of the splitter vanes at between about fifty percent (50%) and about seventy percent (70%) of the radial length of each primary blade.
In some applications it is desirable to use splitter vanes that fall outside the 50-70% radial length envelope. Thus, in these applications, the splitter vane radial length L may be less than 50% of the length of the primary blades, typically in the range of 30-45% of the primary blade length. In the shorter vane embodiment, the height from the base 22 to the top edge 24 is also proportionately decreased while the angles A and B of the outer and inner edges 26, 28 relative to the base are unchanged.
In the exemplary embodiment, the splitter vane 20 has a surface area of about 100 cm2, while the primary blade 20 has a surface area of about 200 cm2. Thus, each splitter vane 20 has a surface area that is about one-half of the surface area of each blade 20, which means that the relative flow generating capacity of the vanes is less. But the splitter vanes 20 add airflow capacity to the existing blades 20 without significant impact on operating noise and at locations within the fan 10 where unwanted recirculation occurs. This additional flow capacity carries with it improved flow efficiency. Moreover, the present fan produces increased and efficient airflow without requiring larger (e.g., greater diameter or height) blades, as would otherwise be necessary to increase airflow. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the diameter of the fan is about 16 inches, but the addition of the splitter vanes produces airflow comparable to a fan having a diameter of about 20 inches.
In addition to the airflow benefits afforded by the splitter vanes, the exemplary cooling fan 10 is capable of bi-directional operation. The fan 10 may be mounted on either end of the output shaft of a dynamoelectric device, or may be mounted on a reversible motor. Thus, the fan 10 retains the bi-directional operation capabilities of a straight blade fan while improving flow and maintaining or reducing operating noise.
It is contemplated that the fan 10 may be formed of a variety of materials suitable for the particular application, for instance a metal, such as stainless steel, or a plastic material, such as polyurethane. The fan 10 may be integrally formed in a powdered metal process, or in a molding or a casting process. The fan may also be formed by affixing the blades and vanes to the base plate in a suitable manner, such as by welding, adhesion, or mechanical fasteners.
Embodiments of the fan 10 of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications calling for radial flow cooling. For example, embodiments of the fan 10 of the present invention may be utilized to cool motors in appliances and larger, industrial motors, while other applications are also contemplated as within the scope of embodiments of the present invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 60/990,517, filed on Nov. 27, 2007, in the name of the present inventor, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2205902 | McMahan | Jun 1940 | A |
2247817 | McMahan | Jul 1941 | A |
2434847 | Hagen | Jan 1948 | A |
2458006 | Kilgore | Jan 1949 | A |
2519151 | Overweg | Aug 1950 | A |
2704516 | Mock et al. | Mar 1955 | A |
3228475 | Worthmann | Jan 1966 | A |
3285328 | Woodward | Nov 1966 | A |
3904308 | Ribaud | Sep 1975 | A |
4900228 | Yapp | Feb 1990 | A |
4904158 | Kun | Feb 1990 | A |
5156535 | Budris et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5213473 | Fiala | May 1993 | A |
6435828 | Bostwick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6514052 | Bostwick | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6663347 | Decker et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7157818 | Jones | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20030235496 | Eaton et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005220 | Kawamoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040202539 | Blank et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050042105 | Nishiyama et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047088 | Xu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050163614 | Chapman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196272 | Nikpour | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214115 | Yeck | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060088412 | Barton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070014666 | White | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070031261 | Lombard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036645 | Baker et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039709 | Endo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070134098 | Huber et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154314 | Jarrah et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160461 | Lee | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070227516 | Middlebrook et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070231141 | Chaing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080213093 | Guelich | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080289332 | Decker et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090274560 | Kubota et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006013067 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006013067 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090136357 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60990517 | Nov 2007 | US |