The present disclosure relates to bi-directional bridgeless buck-boost converters for conversion from direct current (DC) voltage to single-phase current alternating (AC) voltage and vice versa.
Various industrial applications require the conversion of electric power from direct current (DC) voltage to alternating current (AC) voltage and vice versa. This can be achieved using Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) circuits and Power Factor Correction (PFC) circuits, respectively. Modern power electronics converters require high performance, such as high efficiency and high power density, and low cost. For some applications, the requirements are even higher in order to satisfy industrial standards, such as is the case with leakage current limits. However, most power converter circuits that are designed to try to minimize leakage current consequently reduce efficiency and power density.
In PFC circuits, the power factor of the AC flowing through the circuit should be corrected to be as close to 1 such that the real power delivered to the circuit is the same as the apparent power before being converted to DC. Correction of the power factor is typically achieved using a passive network of capacitors or inductors. The AC voltage is converted to the DC voltage using some sort of rectifier, however the DC output that is generated typically comprises pulses of current because the AC is sinusoidal, which accordingly may be smoothed out using a filter (usually some sort of capacitor arrangement).
PFC circuits are used in a wide range of applications, including but not limited to motor drives, electric vehicle chargers, electronic ballasts, uninterrupted power supply systems, etc. However, several problems exist when these circuits are implemented. A first problem is a low efficiency problem due to high losses in the conversion of the voltage. This is because in a power supply unit there are usually two power stages, the first being a PFC stage to shape the input current to be sinusoidal to meet industrial standards and to step up the grid voltage (e.g. 120V) to be higher than the peak voltage of the grid (e.g. 200V), and the second stage comprising a buck-converter to step down the voltage (e.g. 48V). A second problem is a common mode voltage issue, which is a common problem for bridgeless converters (used so that the output has the same polarity as the input). Conventional bridgeless converters create high voltage jumping between a negative port of the DC link and system ground, which leads to high leakage current that fails to meet industrial standards. Attempts have been made to try to correct these issues, but often require a large number of semiconductors in the current path leading to high conduction losses and costs, and/or require large input filters.
Broadly, VSI circuits perform the opposite of PFC circuits in that they are converting a DC voltage to an AC voltage. Since the voltage is being converted from DC, the power factor should already be equal to 1 and thus there is no power factor correction required in AC. VSI circuits are used in a wide range of applications, including but not limited to: photovoltaic (PV) inverters where the variable DC output of a solar PV panel is converted into AC to be fed into a commercial electric grid or for use by an off-grid network, fuel cell inverters which perform similar function but with fuel cells, other grid-connected applications, etc.
However, several problems exist when these circuits are implemented. Similar to PFC circuits, there are low efficiency problems and common mode voltage issues. With regards to a PV inverter for example, there are typically two power stages—the first being a DC-DC boost converter for Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) to determine the maximum power output from the PV power and to maintain the DC voltage link at a high enough value for the second power stage, which is the VSI comprising a buck-type DC-AC inverter and which shapes the output current as a sine wave to meet industrial standards. The first stage requires a boost converter to bring up the voltage from the PV panels to the DC link capacitor bank. This approach gives an unimpressive efficiency for the whole converter of maximum 97% for a 1.5 kW system, due to the two power conversion stages.
Again using a PV inverter as an example, the common mode voltage issue is typical for transformerless PV inverters because there is high voltage jumping between a negative port of PV panels and the system ground, this leads to a shorter lifetime of the PV panels and creates electromagnetic interference noise to the grids, as well as potentially poses a safety issue for users. Thus there are regulations to limit the value of the leakage current of a VSI (for example, in Europe: DIN V VDE V 0126-1-1, which limits the leakage current to 300 mA).
Conventionally, using bi-polar switching was a solution to the leakage current issue, however this creates increased switching losses and increases the size of grid inductors in order to achieve small current ripples. Other attempts have been made to solve these problems but produce negative effects such as increased conduction losses due to a large number of semiconductors.
Accordingly, an improved bridgeless buck-boost electrical power converter circuit remains highly desirable.
Further features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
The present disclosure provides an electric power conversion circuit, comprising: a direct current (DC) voltage connection interface providing a positive DC port and a negative DC port; an alternating current (AC) voltage connection interface providing a positive AC port and a negative AC port; a first series connection having a first diode (D1) with a first inductor (L1), connected in parallel with the positive DC port and negative DC port of the DC voltage connection; a second series connection having a second diode (D2) with a second inductor (L2), connected in parallel with the positive DC port and negative DC port of the DC voltage connection; a first switch (S3) having a first end connected to a point along the first series connection between the first diode (D1) and the first inductor (L1), and having a second end connected to the positive AC port of the AC voltage connection; a second switch (S4) having a first end connected to a point along the second series connection between the second diode (D2) and the second inductor (L2); and a reconfigurable capacitor-inductor (CL) filter circuit configured to connect one or more switching capacitors (CAB; CA, CB) between the AC ports and the DC ports.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to various embodiments thereof as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without using some of the implementation details set forth herein. It should also be understood that well known operations have not been described in detail in order to not unnecessarily obscure the invention. Embodiments are described below, by way of example only, with reference to
The present disclosure provides a bidirectional bridgeless buck-boost power converter circuit, wherein bidirectional means that the converter circuit can function as both a voltage source inverter (VSI) circuit to transform DC voltage to AC voltage and as a power factor corrector (PFC) circuit to transform AC voltage to DC voltage. The disclosed converter fully utilizes inductors to form a CL filter and buck-boost converter energy storage element. Thus, low inductance chokes are used in the converter, which leads to a higher power density and is more cost-effective. Further, the bridgeless configuration minimizes conduction losses of semiconductors, and coupled with the use of low inductance chokes this improves system efficiency.
The bridgeless buck-boost circuit 102 comprises a capacitor, C, at the DC voltage connection interface between the positive (VDC+) and negative (VDC−) ports. There are two series connections comprising switches S1 and S2 respectively in series with two inductors L1 and L2. The switches comprise a high-frequency semiconductor switch with parasitic anti-parallel diodes. The polarity of these switches are such that the switches can block current from flowing through the switches to the negative DC voltage input port VDC−. The inductors can be used as a buck-boost energy storage inductor or a grid filtering inductor depending on the polarities. These series connections are in parallel with the positive and negative ports of the DC voltage source Vin. The bridgeless buck-boost circuit 102 further comprises two additional switches S3 and S4 (again each comprising a high-frequency semiconductor switch with a parasitic anti-parallel diode) which have a first end connected along the series connections of the switches S1, S2 and the inductors L1, L2. In particular, switch S3 has a first end connected at a point between the switch S1 and inductor L1, and switch S4 has a first end connected at a point between the switch S2 and inductor L2. A second end of the switches S3 and S4 connect to AC output ports. In particular, switch S3 has a second end connected to the positive AC output port, and the switch S4 has a second end connected to the negative AC output port. The switches S3 and S4 have polarity such that they can block current from flowing to the respective AC output port. That is, switch S3 can prevent current from flowing to the positive AC output port, and switch S4 can prevent current from flowing to the negative AC output port.
The VSI circuit further includes a reconfigurable CL filter circuit 104 as a filtering technique. This circuit is configured to connect a capacitor CAB between the DC input ports and the AC output ports. This allows positive current to flow to the positive AC voltage output port corresponding to a positive part of the AC sine wave, and for negative current to flow to the negative AC voltage output port corresponding to a negative part of the AC sine wave. This switching is achieved through the use of low frequency bi-directional switching semiconductor switches SA and SB, of which SA is connected in series between the input DC voltage ports and the positive AC output port, and SB is connected in series between the input DC voltage ports and the negative AC output port. The bi-directional switches SA and SB may be realized by connecting two MOSFETs back-to-back in series or other circuits and devices which can provide bi-directional blocking characteristics, as will be described with reference to
The configuration of the VSI circuit provides several benefits which will be further discussed herein, including but not limited to low semiconductor losses, low leakage current, as well a wide range of input voltage control capacity. In particular, the single stage buck-boost circuit 102 increases efficiency due to the elimination of unnecessary power stages. The reconfigurable CL filter circuit 104 provides a capacitor in between the DC voltage input and the AC voltage output, which eliminates the conventional common mode voltage issue since the capacitor in the CL filter clamps the voltage between the grid and the positive port of the DC voltage connection interface.
The bridgeless buck-boost circuit 202 comprises a capacitor, C, at DC voltage connection interface between the positive (VDC+) and negative (VDC−) ports. There are two series connections comprising diodes D1 and D2 respectively in series with two inductors L1 and L2. The polarity of these diodes are such that the diodes can block current from flowing to the negative DC voltage output port VDC−. The inductors can be used as a buck-boost energy storage inductor or a grid filtering inductor depending on the polarities. These series connections are in parallel with DC voltage connection interface. The bridgeless buck-boost circuit 102 further comprises two switches S3 and S4 comprising a high-frequency semiconductor switch with a parasitic anti-parallel diode, which have a first end connected along the series connections of the diodes D1, D2 and the inductors L1, L2. In particular, switch S3 has a first end connected at a point between the diode D1 and inductor L1, and switch S4 has a first end connected at a point between the diode D2 and inductor L2. A second end of the switches S3 and S4 connect to AC input ports. In particular, switch S3 has a second end connected to the positive AC input port, and the switch S4 has a second end connected to the negative AC input port. The switches S3 and S4 have polarity such that they can block current from flowing from the respective AC input port. That is, switch S3 can prevent current from flowing from the positive AC input port, and switch S4 can prevent current from flowing from the negative AC input port.
The PFC circuit further includes a reconfigurable CL filter circuit 204 as a filtering technique. This circuit is configured to connect a capacitor CAB between the AC input ports and the DC output ports. This allows positive current to flow from the positive AC voltage input port corresponding to a positive part of the AC sine wave, and for negative current to flow from the negative AC voltage input port corresponding to a negative part of the AC sine wave. This switching is achieved through the use of low frequency bi-directional switching semiconductor switches SA and SB, of which SA is connected in series between the positive input AC voltage port and the DC output ports, and SB is connected in series between the negative input AC voltage port and the DC output ports. The bi-directional switches SA and SB may be realized by connecting two MOSFETs back-to-back in series or other circuits and devices which can provide bi-directional blocking characteristics, as will be described with reference to
The configuration of the PFC circuit provides several benefits which will be further discussed herein, including but not limited to low semiconductor losses, low leakage current, as well a wide range of output voltage control capacity. In particular, the single stage buck-boost circuit 202 increases efficiency due to the elimination of unnecessary power stages. The reconfigurable CL filter circuit 204 provides a capacitor in between the AC voltage input and the DC voltage output, which eliminates the conventional common mode voltage issue since the capacitor in the CL filter clamps the voltage between the grid and the positive port of the DC voltage connection interface.
Switching states and equivalents are now described to exemplify some of the functionality and operation of the VSI and PFC circuits shown in
Table 1 below summarizes the switching actions of all of the switches in the four-quatral operating modes for the VSI. The four-quatral operating modes allows the VSI to deliver reactive power. In Table 1, “1” represents high, “0” represents low, “X” represents it does not matter, “HF” represents high frequency, and “LF” represents low frequency.
In addition to the VSI and PFC circuits shown in
The VSI and PFC circuits disclosed herein, including their variants, may be implemented as part of any application requiring inverting technology or power factor correction technology, including but not limited to PV inverters, power supplies, electric vehicle charges, and AC grid and DC grid interfaces.
It would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the circuits and components shown in
The present application claims priority to U.S. application No. 62/413,262 filed Oct. 26, 2016, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7046534 | Schmidt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7411802 | Victor et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20120306412 | Tang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140153299 | Jeong | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150022164 | Ye | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150162822 | Ho et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100536306 | Jun 2008 | CN |
203219195 | Sep 2013 | CN |
2882090 | Jun 2015 | EP |
Entry |
---|
VDE-AR-N 4105, “Power generation systems connected to the low-voltage distribution network”. |
C. Ho et al.; “A comparative performance study of an interleaved boost converter using commercial Si and SiC diodes for PV applications”, IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 289-299, Jan. 2013. |
R. Gonzalez et al.; “Transformerless Inverter for Single-Phase Photovoltaic Systems”; IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 693-697, Mar. 2007. |
R.O. Caceres and I. Barbi, “A Boost DC-AC Converter: Analysis, Design, and Experimentation”; IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 134-141, Jan. 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180115256 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62413262 | Oct 2016 | US |