The present invention relates to brain wave measurement. The invention further relates to a system for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements. More specifically the invention relates to a system for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements where at least a part of the system is adapted to be worn in or at an ear of a person subject to the measurements. Moreover the invention relates to a method for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements.
It is generally known, particularly within medical science, to measure brain waves by placing electrodes on the scalp of a subject whose brain waves it is desired to measure (for simplicity denoted “subject” in the following), and to view, process and interpret the measured brain waves using suitable equipment. Typically, such equipment is an electroencephalograph, by means of which a so-called electroencephalogram (EEG) may be achieved. An electroencephalograph provides a measurement and a recording of electrical activity in a subject's brain by measuring the electric potential generated on the surface of the subject's scalp by currents flowing between synapses in the subject's brain. Within medical science brain waves are used for various diagnostic purposes.
A system for such a use is known from WO-A1-2006/047874, which describes measurement of brain waves by use of electrodes placed in connection with at least one of the ears of a subject, i.e. placed on an outer ear part or placed in the ear canal. The measurements are used particularly for detecting the onset of an epileptic seizure. WO-A1-2006/047874 also describes the use of electrodes in pairs as detection and reference electrodes respectively, such a setup being well known in the field of electroencephalography.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,769,439 B2 discloses an apparatus for balancing brain wave frequencies, wherein the apparatus comprises an EEG system to measure the brain left and right electrical signals and a computer for controlling the apparatus and wherein the EEG system can communicate wirelessly with the computer.
WO-A2-2007150003 discloses a system for ambulatory, long term monitoring of a physiological signal from a patient. At least part of the system may be implanted within the patient. Brain activity signals are sampled from the patient with an externally powered leadless implanted device and transmitted to a handheld patient communication device for further processing.
Generally these systems tend to be bulky, uncomfortable to wear and power consuming.
It is therefore a feature of the present invention to overcome at least these drawbacks and provide a system for bi-hemispheric brain wave measurements that is comfortable and inconspicuous to wear and that has a relatively low power consumption.
It is a further feature of the present invention to provide a method for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements with a relatively low power consumption.
The invention, in a first aspect, provides a system for bi-hemispheric brain wave measurements, including a first device and a second device, wherein said first device is adapted to be worn in or at a first ear of a person subject to the measurements, and wherein said first device comprises a first and a second electrode adapted for measuring a first brain wave signal, first data acquisition means adapted for providing first digital data representing said first brain wave signal, first brain wave signal processing means configured for analyzing at least said first digital data, and first wireless link means; said second device comprises a third and a fourth electrode adapted for measuring a second brain wave signal, second data acquisition means adapted for providing second digital data representing said second brain wave signal, and second wireless link means; wherein said first and second wireless link means are adapted to establish a wireless connection between said first and said second device.
This provides a system that that is comfortable and inconspicuous to wear, whereby e.g. long term bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements can be carried out with little or no discomfort for the user.
The invention, in a second aspect, provides a method for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements, a method for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave analysis, comprising the steps of providing a first device adapted for measuring a first brain wave in, or in the vicinity of, a first ear of a person subject to the analysis; providing a second device adapted for measuring a second brain wave in, or in the vicinity of, a second ear of said person; measuring said first and said second brain wave; wirelessly transmitting data representing at least one of said first and said second measured brain wave using a wireless connection between said first device and said second device; and analyzing data representing said first and said second measured brain wave, hereby providing a bi-hemispherical brain wave analysis.
This method is very well suited for long term bi-hemispherical brain wave measurements.
The invention, in a third aspect, provides a method for performing bi-hemispherical brain wave analysis, comprising the steps of providing a first device adapted for measuring a brain wave in, or in the vicinity of, a first ear of a person subject to the analysis; providing a second device adapted for providing an audio stimulation of a second ear of the person; providing a wireless connection between said first and said second device; exchanging data using said wireless connection in order to synchronize in time said first and said second device; providing an audio stimulation of said person measuring a brain wave; and analyzing said brain wave measurement with respect to the audio stimulation.
Further advantageous features appear from the dependent claims.
Still other features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description wherein the invention will be explained in greater detail.
By way of example, there is shown and described a preferred embodiment of this invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modification in various, obvious aspects all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and descriptions will be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive. In the drawings:
Reference is first made to
The two devices 102, 103 are wirelessly connected through a wireless link 104 whereby a bi-hemispheric brain wave measurement can be carried out.
In a variation of the system according to
In yet another variation of the system according to
In a variation of said embodiment, at least one of the devices 102, 103 comprises an additional electrode that is adapted to be positioned on the scalp of the user 101. This variation of the system is further described with reference to
In still another variation of the system according to
In another variation of the system according to
Reference is now made to
The tube 106 comprises electrical wires (not shown) for providing the electrode signals from the earpiece 107 and to the electronics module accommodated in the housing 105.
In a variation of the embodiment according to
In another variation of the embodiment according to
The housing 105 is adapted to be worn behind an ear of the user.
The earpiece 107 is custom molded to fit within an ear canal of the user. When inserted in the ear canal of the user, the surface of the earpiece 107 will lie adjacent to and in physical contact with the tissue of the ear of the user. The five electrodes 108, 109, 110, 111 and 112 are adapted for detecting electrical signals such as brain waves. The actual detection that will be described in detail below is preferably performed with respect to a reference point. The electrodes 108-112 are arranged on the surface of the earpiece 107. Alternatively the electrodes 108-112 may be embedded in the surface of the earpiece 107, or be arranged on or imbedded in the surface of another part of the bi-hemispheric brain wave system as will be further described below. The exact number of electrodes 108-112 provided may be more or less than the five electrodes 108-112 shown, and remains uncritical. However, the provision of at least two electrodes is preferred, as such a configuration provides for the possibility of allowing at least one of the electrodes to act as reference point, thus being a reference electrode, for the remaining electrodes, thus being detecting electrodes. Alternatively the electrodes 108-112 may be set up to operate in clusters, e.g. in pairs, with one electrode acting as a reference electrode for one or more other electrodes, thus acting as detecting electrode(s). The electrodes 108-112 are made of silver, as silver is known to have properties providing for good resistance to the harsh environment present in the human ear canal. However, any material suitable for resisting the environment in the ear canal of a human may be used.
In order to further improve the quality of the signals detected by means of the electrodes 108-112, the bi-hemispheric brain wave system may comprise a conductive gel (not shown) in connection with the electrodes 108-112.
There are numerous advantages by positioning the electrodes in the ear of the user:
All together these advantages make in-the-ear electrodes an attractive technology, especially for long term brain wave measurements.
Long term measurements of brain wave-signals can be used for various health monitoring purposes such as e.g.:
In a variation of the embodiment according to
Reference is now made to
The ADC's 305, 313 sample the respective amplified signals, 304, 312 received from the differential amplifiers 303, 311, thereby creating output signals, 306 and 314, being discrete in time. The output signals 306, 314 from each ADC 305, 313 in combination constitute a signal vector 315 that may be written as s=si(n), i denoting the origin of signal being sampled, i.e. electrode number i, and n denoting the sampling time. Thereby the signal vector 315 may be regarded as a signal in time and space, or as a time dependent vector. The signal vector 315 serves as input for the subsequent signal processing in the bi-hemispheric brain wave system, as will be explained below.
Brain wave signals (bio-electrical potentials) are measured differentially between two electrodes. The two devices placed on each side of the users head are connected through a wireless link, thus there is no galvanic connection. Therefore it is not possible to measure signal differentials between an electrode on the one side of the head and the other side of the head.
A signal feature may therefore be derived from a signal measured on one side, referred to as unilateral signal features, or from a combination of signals measured on one side and the other side, referred to as bilateral signal features. The signal processing advantage of the bi-hemispheric brain wave system comes from either bilateral signal features, from combinations of unilateral signal features from both side, or from using both bilateral signal features and combinations of unilateral signal features, which is more than the trivial redundancy advantage, though the robustness obtained by redundancy may also justify a bi-hemispheric brain wave system.
A vast number of signal features are of interest when processing brain wave signals, e.g. features derived using time-frequency analysis, time domain analysis and data-driven signal decomposition.
Time-frequency analysis is a body of techniques including: short time Fourier transforms, power spectrum estimations, AR-modeling, wavelet transforms, higher order spectra estimations, modified Wigner distribution functions, and Gabor-Wigner distribution functions.
Time domain analysis may be based on the broad band signal or sub-band signals obtained from a bank of band pass filters. Time domain analysis is a body of techniques including but not limited to: auto-correlation function, cross-correlation function, averaging of functions of signals, and empirical estimators of signals.
Averaging of functions of signals could for instance be an autoregressive filtering of the absolute value of the sub-band signals from a filter bank, or auto-regressive filtering of the squared value of the sub-band signals from a filter bank.
Empirical estimators of signals could for instance be percentile estimators of the sub-band signals from a filter bank, a median estimator, or a peak-to-peak time estimator.
Data-driven signal decomposition is a body of methods including but not limited to: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Hilbert-Huang spectrum, Bivariate EMD, and Complex EMD.
As described above the advantage of the bi-hemispheric signal processing system comes from either bilateral signal features, from combinations of unilateral signal features from both sides, or from using both bilateral signal features and combinations of unilateral signal features.
Generally signal features may be combined in many ways such as e.g.:
In most of the applications of the bi-hemispheric brain wave system the electronics module comprises a Feature Extraction block and a Classifier block. These blocks are shown in the block diagrams in
The classifier can be a linear classifier or a non-linear classifier. Non-linear classifiers can be selected from a group comprising: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks, Bayesian Networks, and Kernel Estimators. Additionally Hidden Markov models (HMM) may be used, and in this case it is more a sequence labeling rather than a classification.
Prior to the classifier there may be a preprocessing step for the purpose of reducing the dimensionality of the feature space. Examples of such preprocessing steps are: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF).
The bi-hemispheric brain wave system comprises a left and a right device. Each of these devices comprises means for measuring brain wave signals, means for processing signals, and means for transmitting information to the contra-lateral device.
In
In variations of the examples according to
Turning to
To further clarify the functionality of the feature extraction means 402 and the classifying means 404, one may consider the feature extraction, f, and the classification, c, as dimension reducing mappings of the space S of signal vectors 401, the signal vector 401 being of high dimension:
Reference is now made to
Furthermore, the feature extraction means 502 and 507 are by means of a transmitting means (shown as arrows on
The transmitting means may in principle form a connection between the devices connecting other components than the above mentioned. For instance, and as illustrated in
Reference is now made to
This device is advantageous in that it is possible to position the device completely within an ear canal of a user, while still being able to maintain a wireless link with other devices, such as e.g. the contra-lateral device of the bi-hemispheric brain wave system. The housing has a through going conduit or vent 802 for the purpose of avoiding acoustical occlusion of the user's ear-canal when the device is inserted.
The housing 801 is molded as a custom made shell that has been manufactured based on an impression of the ear canal of the user, whereby an individually fitted device is obtained. The electrodes 804, 805 are embedded on the outer surface of the housing 801. The speaker 808 and the sound passage 803 are configured to allow an audio input to be provided to the user of the device. The antenna 807 constitutes together with the electronics module 806 the wireless link means required to maintain a wireless connection with other wireless devices.
In a variation of the embodiment according to
In another variation of the embodiment according to
This device is especially advantageous for use in sleep monitoring because the positioning of the device inside the ear canal of the user allows the user to sleep without any restrictions with respect to how the user positions himself or herself during sleep. As an example a system with a behind-the-ear device may be uncomfortable if the user prefers to sleep on the side, and with a traditional sleep monitoring system with wired electrode pads fixed in numerous positions on the user's head it will hardly be possible to move at all during sleep.
In yet another variation of the embodiment according to
Reference is now made to
In a variation of the embodiment according to
Several variations exist with regard to the tube 902, whereof several have been described with reference to
Generally all the embodiments of the system according to the invention are especially advantageous for use in methods of treatment that provide an auditory signal in response to a bi-hemispheric measurement, since in this case no other system devices or components are required for carrying out the method because the two electronics modules accommodated in each of the two devices calculate the required auditory signals based on the bi-hemispheric measurements and two speakers likewise accommodated in each of the two devices provide the two auditory signals.
One example of such a method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,769,439B2, which discloses a method for balancing brain wave frequencies, wherein a binaural beat is provided to the person being treated, wherein the frequency range of the binaural beat is determined by measured bi-hemispheric signals.
Generally all the embodiments of the system according to the invention are also especially advantageous for use in methods of treatment or diagnosis that comprise contra-lateral auditory stimulation in connection with brain wave measurements, such as e.g. Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), because the system according to the invention allows the (contra-lateral) stimuli and the brain wave measurements to be coordinated.
One example of such a method is described in “Ipsilateral and Contralateral Acoustic Brainstem Response Abnormalities in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma” in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Dec. 1, 2009 vol. 141 no. 6 695-70, by Chien Shih, et al., which discloses a method for early diagnosis of brain tumors, based on contra-laterally evoked brainstem responses.
Generally auditory evoked ABR measurements can be carried out during sleep, because the auditory stimuli can be so weak that a patient will typically not wake up due to the auditory stimuli.
Generally all the embodiments of the system according to the invention are especially advantageous for use in methods of treatment that require a binaural auditory stimulation in response to a brain wave measurement, because the wireless connection allows the auditory stimulation in the left ear and in the right ear to be synchronized in time whereby a binaural auditory stimulation can be provided.
Reference is made to
The system 1000 comprises a left device 1002 and a right device 1003. The two devices 1002, 1003 comprise the same elements in the block diagram, namely: a set of electrodes 1005, 1006 adapted for measuring brain wave signals, data acquisition means 1007a-b adapted for providing digital data representing said measured brain wave signals, brain wave signal processing means 1008a-b adapted for processing the digital data provided by the data acquisition means 1007a-b, user interface 1010a-b adapted for allowing the user of the system to interact with the system, wireless link means 1011a-b adapted for establishing a wireless connection 1004 between said left device and said right device and device controller 1009a-b configured to control the operation of the devices 1002, 1003. Further, at least one of the wireless link means 1011a-b is adapted for establishing a wireless connection with an external device 1012. Hereby the result of the brain wave analysis or just the digital data representing the brain wave measurements can be transmitted to the external device 1012. In this way the external device 1012 can be used for alerting purposes or for carrying out at least part of the brain wave analysis.
In a variation according to the embodiment of
Reference is now made to
The system 1100 comprises the elements already described with reference to
In this system 1100, the electrodes 1105, 1106 and data acquisition means 1107a-b are accommodated in the respective implanted parts 1112, 1113, together with wireless means 1114a-b that are configured such that digital data are transmitted from the implanted parts 1112, 1113 and to the wireless parts 1115a and 1115b in the corresponding behind-the-ear parts 1102, 1103, and energy to power the implanted parts 1112, 1113 are transmitted from the behind-the-ear parts 1102, 1103 and to the corresponding implanted parts 1112, 1113.
In a further variation of the embodiment according to
In a variation according to all the disclosed embodiments the wireless connection between the left and right device is implemented by the use of an inductive short range radio, that has a very low power consumption.
In further variations according to all the disclosed embodiments the system for bi-hemispheric brain wave measurements is especially adapted for diagnosing epilepsy patients.
In further variations epileptic seizure detection is based on using at least one of blind source separation, independent component analysis and deep neural networks.
In yet other variations it may be determined whether an epileptic seizure has originated in the left or right brain hemi-sphere by comparing the timings of detected epileptic seizure from the first and the second devices. This may be carried out by at least one of the respective devices or in an external device
According to specific variations, the result of brain wave analysis or just the digital data representing the measured brain wave signals may be transmitted to the external device using a wired connection.
According to other variations the external device is adapted to synchronize the timing of the digital data received from the left device with the timing of the digital data received from the right device.
Many patients who are evaluated for having epileptic seizures are in fact not epileptic. Also for many patients, the description of their experiences are very inaccurate and it can be difficult to determine if the spatial location of a potential seizure is right or left, and therefore dual implants allowing the measurement of both left and right brain wave signals are generally advantageous.
Although lateralization, i.e. the spatial location of a seizure, is not strictly important for all patients, the use of two synchronized implants will be able to provide information about seizure origin. Furthermore, two such synchronized channels (i.e. synchronized information provided by the two implants) will also provide improved signal processing due to the additional information, using e.g. techniques based on blind source separation and independent component analysis. Finally, an epileptic seizure may in some cases be clearly detectable in one of the left or right implants and not in the other implant dependent on the spatial origin of the seizure.
Thus for new potential patients where the primary objective is to diagnose whether epilepsy is present, then a bi-hemispheric system according to the present invention is advantageous.
Another group of patients are the refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients that are the most frequent patients to undergo epilepsy surgery. Is has been found that a bi-hemispheric system according to the present invention can be safe and effective as the sole method of recording seizures in a presurgical evaluation for a subset of patients for whom presurgical EEG monitoring using the system according to the present invention can be used to help plan successful temporal lobectomy and thereby an improved likelihood of good outcome of the surgery.
In the paper “Prevalence of bilateral partial seizure foci and implications for electroencephalographic telemetry monitoring and epilepsy surgery”, by Blum in Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 91 (1994) 329-336 an extensive statistical study directed at determining the lateralization of the seizure focus is reported. It was found, based on 605 seizures from 57 patients that the observation of five concordant seizures implies a 95% chance that the seizures arise from the same side, but if one discordant seizure was recorded, then to reach the 95% confidence level would require a total of 11 concordant seizures. In clinical practice, there can be many constraints that make it difficult to monitor patients long enough to obtain such a number of seizures. Therefore, a system according to the present invention provides an advantageous solution by measuring from both sides of the head, since this allows both the right and the left temporal lobe to be monitored simultaneously.
Yet another group of patients include those with drug resistant epilepsy and especially those with infrequent seizures (<1/week), nocturnal seizures, intellectual impairment or difficult-to-treat frequent seizures. For this group of patients there is a poor correlation between patient-reported seizure diaries and actual seizure occurrence. Typically, people with epilepsy are managed by their clinician according to self-reported seizure frequency. Therefore, the management of drug dosages and changes to drugs prescribed is based on data that are likely to be flawed. Thus having a record of the brain wave signals in e.g. refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients with infrequent seizures during periods they report experiencing seizures, can provide important insight to the physician. How frequent the seizures are, how long, and how they are expressed can lead to a different treatment plan. Therefore a system according to the present invention is especially advantageous if the seizures are infrequent. In the paper “The use of single bipolar scalp derivation for the detection of ictal events during long-term EEG monitoringa study” by Bennis et al, Epileptic Disord., August 2017 the utility of single channel detection of ictal events was investigated by clinical neurophysiologists and it was found that all temporal lobe seizures were identified as long as the channel was placed over the temporal lobe of which the seizure originated. Often the neurophysician will have a suspicion of temporal lobe epilepsy, but without the knowledge of the lateralization (i.e. which side of the head a seizure originates from) and by using a system according to the present invention (i.e. a bi-hemispheric system) any kind of temporal lobe epilepsy seizures will be recorded.
Furthermore, as already hinted at above, patients with intellectual impairment would benefit from an objective seizure count, as they are often not able to describe the number and expression of their seizures, and may have paroxysmal abnormal behaviors that can be confused with epilepsy by an observer.
Especially if seizures are infrequent, a system, like one according to the present invention, that is adapted to be worn more or less continuously, or at least for a very long duration, is advantageous. Unless the seizures are generalized (i.e. are measurable from both brain hemi-spheres, it would be necessary to know the seizure origin to ensure that single hemispheric brain wave measurements are able to record seizure-related EEG phenomena. The same is applicable for patients with more difficult-to-treat frequent seizures such as Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome or Landau-Kleffner Syndrome as well as patients with non-convulsive seizures.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that research has suggested that ambulatory EEG (that may be provided using a system according to the present invention) appears superior to routine EEG in capturing interictal abnormalities particularly in relation to natural sleep, circadian variations and the patient's typical daily lifestyle as well as increasing the yield in detecting epileptiform discharges. The ambulatory monitoring (that may also be denoted ultra long term monitoring) will provide the advantage for the clinician to understand the diurnal rhythm, especially regarding the timing of seizures with respect to sleep-wake cycle which is important in e.g. idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Also with respect to mesial temporal lobe, a diurnal study showed treatment advantages, when clinicians were provided with 84 days of ambulatory intracranial recordings.
Other modifications and variations of the structures and procedures will be evident to those skilled in the art.
The present invention is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 13/838,351 filed, Mar. 15, 2013, which is a continuation in part of application PCT/EP2011050348, filed Jan. 12, 2011, published as WO201209517 A1.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13838351 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 16220102 | US | |
Parent | PCT/EP2011/050348 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13838351 | US |