Bi-lateral local renal delivery for treating congestive heart failure and for BNP therapy

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7585836
  • Patent Number
    7,585,836
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 13, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 8, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to systems and methods for local renal delivery of agents to subjects that are at risk for congestive heart failure and other conditions. The invention encompasses devices for renal drug delivery and methods of use.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. Field of the Invention


This invention pertains generally to systems and methods for providing treatment to patients who are at risk for congestive heart failure and other conditions, and more particularly, to a system and method for treating related renal conditions through local delivery of agents to the renal system.


II. Description of Related Art


Heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. There are more than 5 million patients with heart failure and over 500,000 newly diagnosed cases each year. The proper function of the kidney is directly related to cardiac output and blood pressure. In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), cardiac output, blood pressure and renal function can be substantially compromised. Renal function can be further compromised during surgical intervention such as an angioplasty, coronary artery bypass, valve repair and/or replacement, and the like. Additionally, a patient undergoing less invasive analogs of these procedures can be particularly susceptible to renal damage from contrast imaging.


Conventionally, patients with pulmonary edema and symptoms related to CHF are often treated via systemic administration of diuretics and/or vasodilators in order to reduce the load on the heart, increase kidney function, and reduce edema. However, since these patients already suffer from low cardiac output and related blood pressure and renal problems, these systemically administered agents can take a long time to achieve beneficial results, if any. At the same time, systemic side effects such as hypotension, which further compromise the patients, often lead to discontinued treatment prior to having a desired therapeutic effect.


Acute renal failure (“ARF”) is the sudden and temporary loss of kidney function. As such, there is an abrupt decrease in the kidney's ability to excrete waste from the blood. The change in kidney function can be attributable to many causes. Any traumatic event, such as hemorrhage, gastrointestinal fluid loss, or renal fluid loss without proper fluid replacement may cause a patient to exhibit ARF. Patients also become prone to developing ARF after receiving anesthesia, invasive surgery, or alpha-adrenergic agonists because of related systemic or renal vasoconstriction. Additionally, systemic vasodilation caused by anaphylaxis, anti-hypertensive drugs, sepsis or a drug overdose may also cause ARF. This response is likely because the body's natural defense is to temporarily shut down non-essential organs such as the kidneys; however, in the case of chronic CHF, the reduction in blood flow to the kidneys is not just temporary. Reduced cardiac output can be caused by cardiogenic shock, pericardial tamponade, massive pulmonary embolism, or the like. Notably, reduced cardiac output creates an excess of fluid in the body, which, in turn, can exacerbate CHF. More specifically, a reduction in blood flow and blood pressure in the kidneys (i.e., due to reduced cardiac output) can result in the retention of excess fluid in the body, leading, for example, to pulmonary and systemic edema. As such, there is a strong correlation between ARF, reduced cardiac output and CHF.


Various diagnostic systems and procedures employ local delivery of dye (e.g., radiopaque “contrast” agents) or other diagnostic agents that permit the external monitoring system to gather important physiological information about the patient. Patients that undergo diagnostic imaging and/or treatment procedures are usually exposed to these contrast agents or media. For example, angiography employs a hollow, tubular catheter for locally injecting radiopaque dye into a blood vessel or chamber, including coronary arteries in the case of coronary angiography, or a ventricle in the case of cardiac ventriculography. The kidneys are the body's main blood filtering tools and can be damaged from excessive exposure to high-density radiopaque contrast dye, such as during coronary-, cardiac-, or neuro-angiography procedures. These procedures can result in a condition known as radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN), wherein an acute impairment of renal function follows exposure to radiographic contrast materials. This typically results in a rise in serum creatinine levels of more than 25% above baseline, or an absolute rise of 0.5 mg/dl, within 48-72 hours. Hence, in addition to congestive heart failure (CHF), renal damage associated with RCN is a frequently observed cause of ARF. RCN is one of the most common causes of onset renal failure and renal impairment in hospital patients.


For prolonged local administration of protective agents into the renal system long dwell times may also be desirable. This can be achieved via a retrograde femoral approach, such as that commonly used in intravascular catheterization procedures. However, an antegrade approach, for example, via the brachial or radial arteries, may be more effective under specific circumstances (i.e., where a patient is not able to lay down during long dwell times due to pulmonary edema). The antegrade approach is gaining more popularity in standard coronary and other intravascular intervention, and may be particularly beneficial over femoral delivery in such cases as mentioned above where a patient will need to be able to sit up after placement of the device. Notably, when a patient is in motion during dwell periods, conventional catheter-based devices can become dislodged. For example, dislodging of a device placed in the renal arteries can occur during arm and upper body motion if placed via a brachial approach; or during leg, waist or lower body motion (such as simply sitting up after placement) if placed via a femoral approach.


Angiographic catheters and other tubular delivery catheters can be used to locally inject therapeutic agents into specific spaces and lumens into the body of CHF patients. Examples include local delivery of thrombolytic drugs such as TPA™ agent, heparin, cumadin, or urokinase into areas of vascular injury including thrombotic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or near thrombogenic implants. In addition, various balloon catheter systems can be used for local administration of therapeutic agents into targeted body lumens or spaces associated with blood vessels. Balloon catheter systems may include balloons with porous or perforated walls that elute drug agents into surrounding tissue including walls of blood vessels. Multiple balloon catheters employ spaced balloons that are inflated to engage a lumen or vessel wall in order to isolate the intermediate catheter region from in-flow or out-flow across the balloons. A fluid agent delivery system can be coupled to the intermediate catheter region in order to fill the region with a drug. The drug is meant to affect the isolated region between the balloons.


There are some advances in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms contributing to sodium and water retention in CHF, and patients can be treated with a variety of drugs. Natriuretic peptides are a group of naturally occurring substances that act in the body to oppose the activity of the renin-angiotensin system. There are three major natriuretic peptides: atrial natriuretic or A-type peptide (ANP), which is synthesized in the atria; brain natriuretic or B-type peptide (BNP), which is synthesized in the ventricles; and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), which is synthesized in the brain. ANP and BNP act mainly as cardiac hormones while CNP is mostly active in the central nervous system and in peripheral tissues, including blood vessels. The natriuretic peptides ANP and BNP are also known as cardioneurohormones, and are secreted from the heart in response to increased intracardiac volume or pressure. They are secreted from the ventricles in response to volume expansion or pressure overload, and levels of BNP have been shown to be elevated in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. More specifically, both ANP and BNP are released in response to atrial and ventricular stretch, and will cause vasorelaxation, inhibition of aldosterone secretion in the adrenal cortex, and inhibition of renin secretion in the kidney. Both ANP and BNP will cause natriuresis and a reduction in intravascular volume, effects amplified by antagonism of antidiuretic hormone (ADH). For example, the natural human peptide called human B-type natriuretic peptide (HBNP) is secreted by the heart as part of the body's normal response to heart failure. The drug Natrecor® formulation (nesiritide) (manufactured by Scios Inc.) is a recombinant form of the endogenous human peptide which is intravenously administered to patients with acutely decompensated congestive heart failure (see Natrecor® (nesiritide) for Injection, Scios Inc. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,114,923 and 5,674,710). The physiologic effects of CNP are different from those of ANP and BNP. CNP has a hypotensive effect, but no significant diuretic or natriuretic actions. Three natriuretic peptide receptors (NPRs) have been described that have different binding capacities for ANP, BNP, and CNP. Removal of the natriuretic peptides from the circulation is affected mainly by binding to clearance receptors and enzymatic degradation in the circulation. Increased blood levels of natriuretic peptides have been found in certain disease states, suggesting a role in the pathophysiology of those diseases, including congestive heart failure (CHF), systemic hypertension, and acute myocardial infarction. The natriuretic peptides also serve as disease markers and indicators of prognosis in various cardiovascular conditions. BNP, which is synthesized in the cardiac ventricles and correlates with LV pressure, amount of dyspnea, and the state of neurohormonal modulation, makes this peptide the first potential marker for heart failure. Measurement of plasma BNP concentration is evolving as a screening technique (e.g., Biosite Diagnostics, Inc.) for identifying patients with various cardiac abnormalities regardless of etiology and degree of LV systolic dysfunction that can potentially develop into obvious heart failure and carry a high risk of a cardiovascular event (Dr. James Hill, Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure, University of Florida College of Medicine (2001)).


Patients suffering from CHF would enormously benefit from safe and effective local therapies or prophylaxis of renal conditions related to CHF. Clearly, there exists a clinical need for treatment that provides for a fluid overload reduction quickly, reliably, and in the absence of undesired side effects. This is particularly critical, since the CHF patient population often presents with pulmonary edema and many other serious co-morbidities. A further need exists for a bilateral renal delivery device system and method that would allow for reliable and robust positioning of the bilateral delivery/injection assembly in vivo. Such a system would work regardless of whether the patient is motion or not.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of the invention provides a system and method for treating congestive heart failure (CHF) using an in-dwelling bilateral local renal delivery catheter that is adapted to maintain the position of a bilateral local renal injection assembly at an injection location associated with the renal arteries, and during relative patient motion between an access site and the injection location.


Another aspect of the invention provides a system and method for bilateral local renal delivery of an agent that affects renal function in a living being in a manner that achieves substantial renal concentrations or effects and with substantially lower systemic concentrations or effects.


Still, another aspect of the invention provides a system and method for bilateral local renal delivery of BNP in a living being in a manner that achieves substantial local renal concentrations or effects and with substantially lower levels of systemic concentrations or effects.


A further aspect of the invention provides for a method that comprises locally administering a natriuretic peptide into at least one renal artery of a patient. Alternatively, the natriuretic peptide can be locally delivered into both renal arteries of the patient, wherein the local delivery into both renal arteries can occur simultaneously.


The invention further contemplates a method that comprises positioning an intravascular catheter through an aorta so that at least one delivery port is positioned in or about at least one renal artery, and delivering an active substance through the intravascular catheter to the renal artery or arteries, wherein the catheter comprises a compliant region which accommodates tension or compression resulting from patient movement at the catheter access site when the catheter is positioned in the aorta and the delivery port is in or about the renal artery or arteries.


The invention also encompasses a renal drug delivery catheter that comprises a catheter body having a proximal end, a distal end, and a drug delivery lumen therethrough, and a hub on the proximal end adapted to deliver drugs to the drug delivery lumen, wherein the distal end of the catheter body is adapted to enter a renal artery when the catheter body is located in an adjacent aorta, and wherein a portion of the catheter body is compliant and configured to accommodate tension or compression resulting from patient movement when the catheter body is in the aortic and the distal end is in the renal artery.


Another aspect of the invention provides for the use of a natriuretic peptide in the manufacture of a medicament for the therapeutic and/or prophylactic treatment of congestive heart failure or other conditions, including but not limited to, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus. The invention further provides for the use of a natriuretic peptide in the manufacture of a medicament for the therapeutic and/or prophylactic treatment of renal conditions that are associated with congestive heart failure or any or all of the conditions described above. The natriuretic peptide is locally administered into at least one renal artery of a patient. Alternatively, the natriuretic peptide can be locally administered into both renal arteries of the patient, wherein the local administration into both renal arteries can occur simultaneously.


Another aspect of the invention provides for the use of a natriuretic peptide in the preparation of an agent in ready-to-use drug form for treating or preventing congestive heart failure or other conditions, including but not limited to, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus. The invention further provides for the use of a natriuretic peptide in the preparation of an agent in ready-to-use drug form for treating or preventing renal conditions that are associated with congestive heart failure or any or all of the conditions described above.


Various further aspects, modes, embodiments, variations, and features of the invention will be brought out in the following portions of the specification, wherein the detailed description is for the purpose of fully disclosing particular illustrative embodiments of the invention without placing limitations thereon.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is best understood when read in conjunction with the accompanying figures, which serve to illustrate the preferred embodiments. It is understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed in the figures.



FIG. 1A depicts one embodiment of the invention, a bifurcated infusion catheter intended for antegrade delivery to the renal arteries, with a flexible shaft of suitable length for brachial artery access and a randomly shaped compliant section.



FIG. 1B depicts another embodiment of a bifurcated infusion branch configuration for the antegrade catheter as demonstrated in FIG. 1A.



FIG. 1C depicts a further embodiment of the invention, a bifurcated infusion catheter intended for retrograde delivery to the renal arteries, with a flexible shaft of suitable length for femoral or iliac artery access and a randomly shaped compliant section.



FIG. 1D depicts a further embodiment of a bifurcated infusion branch shape for the retrograde catheter as demonstrated in FIG. 1C.



FIG. 2 illustrates another embodiment of the invention, a catheter with a structured section in the form of a coil along a catheter shaft. This design accommodates patient movement without affecting renal placement of the catheter.



FIG. 3 depicts a graph that shows the systemic BNP concentration in two different test animals as a result of intra-renal (IR) vs. intravenous (IV) administration of BNP. Differences of 75% and 66%, and 61% and 69% in serum BNP levels were seen with IR (▾) versus IV (▪) infusion of BNP at comparable time points in Canine #1 (solid lines) and Canine #2 (broken lines), respectively.



FIG. 4A depicts a graph that shows the mean arterial pressure changes due to intravenous (IV) BNP administration. A maximum BP reduction of 50% with IV BNP administered during constricted vascular state induced by phenylepherine demonstrated an anti-vasoconstrictive effect of BNP.



FIG. 4B depicts another graph that shows the mean arterial pressure changes to intra-renal (IR) BNP administration. A maximum BP reduction of 15% with IR BNP administered during constricted vascular state induced by phenylepherine is shown. The relative lack of effect on MAP as compared to IV administration demonstrated the effect of lower systemic BNP levels due to IR administration and renal first-pass effects.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
I. Definitions

The following definitions are set forth to illustrate and define the meaning and scope of the various terms used to describe the present invention.


A “natriuretic peptide” refers to a natural or artificial substance that can be administered to a subject that is at risk for developing or suffering from one or more condition, including, but not limited to congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus. The natriuretic peptide can administered via a pharmaceutical carrier, in a pharmaceutical compositions, in form of a drug, as an agent or via other suitable means. Examples of natriuretic peptides are atrial natriuretic or A-type natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP).


The term “compliant region”, as used herein, refers to a portion of a catheter or other similar device. The compliant region accommodates tension or compression resulting from patient movement when a catheter or similar device is positioned inside of the patient. This may be accomplished by the catheter having a specific section wherein the forces required to stretch or compress the section's length are substantially less than those required to displace the catheter at its renal location or at its vascular access site; the section may be formed of a more compliant material than the remainder of the catheter in order to achieve this behavior. Alternatively, this may be accomplished via providing a pre-set or random shape to a section of the catheter shaft, the provision of which will effect a similar ability to isolate movement from one end of the catheter to the other, preventing dislodgment of the catheter from its renal location. Examples of the latter type of compliant region include, but are not limited to, structures that have a coil, a serpentine, or a zig-zag geometry, and in these cases the material properties of the compliant region may be the same, similar, or different than those of the remainder of the catheter.


The term “active substance”, as used herein, refers to any agent, drug, and/or pharmaceutical composition that can be administered to a subject, including animals and humans. The active substance can be naturally derived or synthetically manufactured.


II. Bi-Lateral Local Renal Delivery

One aspect of the invention provides for a method that comprises locally administering a natriuretic peptide into at least one renal artery of a patient. Alternatively, the natriuretic peptide can be locally delivered into both renal arteries of the patient, wherein the local delivery into both renal arteries can occur simultaneously. Local renal artery infusion is preferable over standard IV administration as the renal dose can be maximized while concurrently the systemic exposure is reduced due to the first-pass elimination effects of the kidneys. This method is particularly applicable when the patient is at risk of developing and/or suffers from at least one condition including, but not limited to, congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus, and when the patient is resistant to IV therapy due to systemic dosing limitations or side effects. Preferably, the peptide is administered in form of a drug or pharmaceutical composition. In one embodiment, the drug is delivered in bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg. In another embodiment, the drug is delivered via continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min. In yet another embodiment, the drug is delivered through a bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg in combination with continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min. The natriuretic peptide administered to the patient includes BNP, ANP, and CNP, or a combination of one or more of these. The administration of the natriuretic peptide may be adjusted depending on various factors, such as clinical condition of the patient, age of the patient, severity of the disease, environmental factors, etc. For example, a patient suffering from moderate to severe symptoms of CHF can be administered natriuretic peptide in form of a bolus at, for example, 2 mcg/kg bolus followed by a 0.01 mcg/kg/min infusion. The dose is adjustable and the infusion dose can be increased or decreased as necessary to achieve the desired effects. Alternatively or in combination, an additional bolus dose could also be given.


The invention further contemplates a method that comprises positioning an intravascular catheter through an aorta so that at least one delivery port is positioned in or about at least one renal artery, and delivering an active substance through the intravascular catheter to the renal artery or arteries, wherein the catheter comprises a compliant region which accommodates tension or compression resulting from patient movement when the catheter is positioned in the aorta and the delivery port is in the renal artery or arteries. The compliant region of the catheter is preferably non-linear and includes, but is not limited to, a coil structure, a serpentine structure, or a zig-zag structure. Such a structure allows that section of the catheter to absorb motion like a spring, allowing the renal delivery portion of the catheter to remain in its location for agent delivery while the patient is mobile. In addition, the compliant region of the catheter may have a stiffness less that than of adjacent regions to permit slackness in the region after deployment in the aorta. In one embodiment, the positioning of the intravascular catheter comprises straightening the compliant region with a stylet disposed within a lumen of the catheter, advancing the catheter through the aorta while the catheter remains straightened with the stylet, and withdrawing the stylet from the compliant region to allow the compliant region to assume its non-linear configuration. The active substance that is delivered via this method comprises a natriuretic peptide (e.g., BNP, ANP, and CNP). The method may further include delivering the natriuretic peptides at specific dosages. As indicated above, the natriuretic peptide can be delivered in bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg, via continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min, and/or through a bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg in combination with continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min. Related systems and methods are disclosed in co-pending commonly owned PCT International Patent Application Nos. PCT/US03/29744 and PCT/US04/08573, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


III. Local Renal Delivery System

The invention also encompasses a renal drug delivery catheter that comprises a catheter body having a proximal end, a distal end, and a drug delivery lumen therethrough, and a hub on the proximal end adapted to deliver drugs to the drug delivery lumen, wherein the distal end of the catheter body is adapted to enter a renal artery when the catheter body is located in an adjacent aorta, and wherein a portion of the catheter body is compliant and configured to accommodate tension or compression resulting from patient movement when the catheter body is in the aorta and the distal end is in the renal artery. The portion of the catheter body that is compliant and configured to accommodate tension or compression is preferably non-linear and includes, but is not limited to, a coil, a serpentine, or a zig-zag geometry over a length. In addition, the compliant section or portion may have a stiffness that is less than that of adjacent regions of the catheter so that the complaint section is slack and can be loosely deployed to accommodate tension and elongation after placement. In one embodiment, the renal drug delivery catheter further comprises a stylet, which can be placed in a lumen during delivery to straighten the compliant section or portion.


One embodiment of the invention provides a bifurcated renal infusion catheter. The catheter can be placed bilaterally into the renal arteries via the aorta to infuse any given agent or drug directly into the renal circulation. This simultaneously achieves the desired renal effect and the reduction or elimination of systemic side effects. This embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 1, wherein the bifurcated infusion catheter consists of a flexible shaft of a usable length, which can be, for example, between about 70 cm to approximately 160 cm long, with an outer diameter within a range, for example, of between about 2 Fr. to about 6 Fr., with two distal infusion branches. Each infusion branch includes a generally flexible tubular construction with an outer diameter that may typically be in the range for of between about 1 Fr. to about 3 Fr. The two branches may be generally opposed, such as for example by about 180°, so as to aid in bilateral renal artery cannulation. The branches can be desirably shaped in order to aid with a specific anatomy. Composite construction (e.g., coiled or braided extruded polymers and/or co-extrusions) of the shaft and infusion branches may be employed in order to take advantage of other embodiments including flexibility, column strength, and torque response. The branches themselves can be cylindrical or may have non-circular cross-sections. The distal (working) end of the device is can be constructed from materials that are visible under fluoroscopy. Alternatively, such materials may be incorporated or placed in or on the device so as to aid in placement under fluoroscopic guidance. The proximal end of the shaft is generally adapted to couple to a fluid source. The device is further adapted for fluid delivery from the source outside the patient and directly into the renal vasculature. The coupler may take the form of an industry-standard luer fitting or other forms as needed.


With the bifurcated renal infusion catheter, arterial access is gained via the brachial artery by using standard techniques (i.e., Seldinger). As such, a standard, commercially available guiding catheter (e.g., about 6-8 Fr.) or guide sheaths (e.g., about 4-6 Fr.) can be placed through the access and guided in retrograde fashion to the aortic arch via fluoroscopy. The guiding catheter or guide sheath is advanced into the peri-renal aorta in an antegrade manner. Through this guiding catheter or guide sheath the bifurcated infusion catheter is then delivered and placed into the renal arteries bilaterally. This device provides for a quick and simple bilateral renal artery cannulation and placement. Once the infusion catheter has been placed, infusion of any given substance (e.g., drug, solution, etc.) can begin according to a physician's direction. Optionally, the device could be introduced through a different artery, for example, the radial artery, depending on preference. Advantages to the use of a guide sheath over a guiding catheter are that it can serve as the access sheath as well, eliminating the need for a third device (introduction sheath) as would be required with the guiding catheter approach, and, as such, this may allow for a reduced profile a the vessel entry site.


The catheter of the instant invention can include a mechanism or structure that can be incorporated within the device to absorb or otherwise accommodate patient movement. This prevents the displacement of the infusion branches from the renal arteries. In order to alleviate a patient's condition, the bifurcated infusion catheter as described may be placed into the patient for an extended period of time (e.g., 4-12 hours or longer). The patient may not remain perfectly still during all of this time, thus, a mechanism that prevents displacement of the device is beneficial and a novel feature of this invention. Accordingly, one embodiment provides a specifically structured section (e.g., a compliant region) of the device for accommodating patient movement without branch dislodgement. The compliant region accommodates tension or compression resulting from patient movement when the catheter is positioned in the aorta. The compliant region can be non-linear and includes, but is not limited to, a coil structure, a serpentine structure, or a zig-zag structure. This compliant region (e.g., a movement-absorbing structure) can be placed, for example, just proximal of the bifurcated infusion branch portion of the catheter. This type of structure allows the device to change length and bend as needed, so that the infusion branches stay in the renal arteries as placed. In one embodiment, the compliant region comes in the form of a loose coil or wave along the catheter shaft. This structure takes shape once deployed in the patient, and can accommodate patient movement without affecting renal placement. An example of this type of pre-formed structure is shown in FIG. 2. Alternatively, this coil or wave may be of a random nature, formed after placement of the device in the patient. The inclusion of a compliant region as described, could in some instances interfere with the handling characteristics of the device, in particular when force transfer is desired, such as during branch seating. Therefore, another structure, such as a mandrel or a stylet provides for the required column strength and torque response to allow for device placement into the renal arteries. A mandrel or a stylet can be placed into the device's fluid lumen to aid in the handling response. The inclusion of a mandrel or stylet aids in keeping the device in a straight configuration, and thus, aids in the axial handling response (push, pull) by providing column strength. A mandrel and its corresponding lumen may be of a non-circular cross section, so as to also provide a mechanism for transmitting torque along the length of the device (whereas a standard round mandrel in a round lumen may simply spin without transmitting torque). In another embodiment, the mandrel or stylet is bifurcated in a similar geometric fashion as the catheter, such that the mandrel or stylet extends into both infusion branches simultaneously, and thus, torque can be transmitted in that manner. If placed in the fluid lumen, a stylet may be removed as necessary to allow agent infusion into the renal arteries.


Additional embodiments of the device and associated method as described above are included herein. For example, a device may be designed to be delivered from below, i.e., via a retrograde femoral approach, and thus, the dimensions, overall construction, and infusion branch shape may be altered to better suit this use. The access into the brachial artery (and approach from this point to the renal arteries) is usually preferred in patients with pulmonary edema subsequent to CHF. In this case the device's dimension, overall construction, and infusion branch shape are tailored for brachial delivery and the antegrade approach. Usually, the device is placed with the patient while he or she is lying down. During infusion times, these patients may not be able tolerate lying down (i.e., flat) for the entire length of time because of the high amount of fluid in their lungs. Thus, these patients may need to sit up in order to properly breathe. Consequently, a standard femoral or iliac approach can be difficult in these patients since the access for the device is within the crease of the groin. When the patient is sitting up, device dislocation can occur. In order to address this issue, a motion-absorbing structure such as the one described previously (e.g., compliant region) or one of another form that serves a similar purpose may be employed to allow the device to adapt to the patient's vasculature during movement. The device's infusion branches could incorporate an additional fixation mechanisms or features to hold the infusion branches in the renal arteries. This allows for substantial blood flow across the point of fixation such that the baseline renal artery flow is not compromised and any agents and/or drugs are efficiently administered. Furthermore, any materials, preferred coatings, dimensions, and the like can be adjusted to various clinical needs and/or physicians' preferences and, thus, are considered to be within the scope of this invention.


Another embodiment of the invention provides for a method wherein the bifurcated catheter remains substantially inside of the guiding catheter or guide sheath during placement. More specifically, only the distal infusion branches are deployed from the guiding catheter or guide sheath. The various other maneuvers that are usually required for placement of the catheter are carried out by maneuvering the guiding catheter or guide sheath. The flexible, motion-absorbing section of the bifurcated infusion catheter is not exposed until after the branches are placed in the renal arteries. Modifications to this method to allow for effective maneuvering of a flexible portion of the catheter are considered within the scope of the invention.


The bifurcated local renal infusion devices of the instant invention are useful in animals and humans, particularly for the infusion of agents and drugs into the peripheral vasculature, including the renal arteries. The device has been successful in both animal (see Examples) and human models. It has proven to be particularly effective whenever it is necessary to quickly access the renal arteries bilaterally and deliver agents or drugs into the renal vasculature selectively, and without eliciting any unwanted side effects. For example, in the canine model, the device was used to evaluate intrarenal (IR) infusion of Natrecor® agent (B-type natriuretic peptide or BNP, see Scios Inc., Johnson & Johnson). A pharmacokinetic study in two dogs (see Examples below) demonstrated significantly reduced steady-state levels of plasma BNP when a given dose was administered IR versus systemically (IV) (i.e., the average reduction was 63%). This shows a significant first-pass clearance effect of BNP by the kidneys and, thus, may serve to increase the maximum usable dose. Clinically, the main side effect of BNP has been that systemic hypotension often limits the dose, and/or time a dose can be given, thereby reducing the efficacy of the drug. Through this animal work, it has been shown that IR delivery of BNP results in reduced systemic levels when compared to IV delivery of BNP, and thus, proportionately reduces the occurrence of side effects like hypotension. A more detailed description of the studies and the related in vivo observations follows in the Example section.


Other devices or methods, including pharmaceutical preparations or dosing or delivery regimens, and medical therapeutic or prophylactic procedures, are also contemplated herein.


IV. Examples

The following specific examples are intended to illustrate the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims. The examples provide a summary of a pre-clinical investigation of the hypotensive effects and pharmacokinetics of intra-renal (IR) versus intravenous (IV) administration of a B-type natriuretic peptide in the canine model.


(i) PURPOSE

The purpose of the experiments was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetics and certain other effects of a novel means of administration (intra-renal, IR) of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) versus standard intravenous (IV) administration. The experimental hypothesis was that IR administration of the natriuretic peptide would result in reduced systemic exposure (as measured by serum BNP levels) and, thus, reduced systemic side effects (e.g., hypotension), afforded by the kidneys' first-pass elimination of the peptide.


(ii) EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL

IR versus IV administration of human recombinant BNP (Natrecor® agent, Scios, Inc., Johnson & Johnson) was compared in the canine model (two animals). IR infusion was achieved using the FlowMedica Benephit™ Infusion System (FlowMedica, Inc.). IV and IR administration was performed in each animal sequentially, and the administration periods were separated by five days to allow for washout and re-acclimation of the animals. IV administration was conducted on the first day in both animals. Other than the route of BNP administration, all other parameters were identical between the IV and IR administration days in both dogs.


Canine #1 received a 2 mcg/kg/min bolus of BNP followed immediately by a 0.15 mcg/kg/min BNP infusion for 90 minutes, followed by a 2-hour washout period. Then vasoconstriction was induced via phenylepherine until mean arterial pressure (MAP) was increased by approximately 30% (approximately 1 hour), and then BNP was again administered at 0.15 mcg/kg/min for 90 minutes.


Canine #2 received a 2 mcg/kg/min BNP bolus followed immediately by a 4-hour continuous infusion of BNP at 0.15 mcg/kg/min.


Key endpoints included serum levels of BNP (pharmacokinetics, both animals) following IR and IV BNP administration, and blood pressure response in response IR and IV BNP administration (Canine #1 only).


(iii) RESULTS

The mean difference between serum BNP levels at comparable time points associated with IR and IV infusion was 75% and 66%, and 61% and 69% in Canine #1 and Canine #2, respectively (higher with IV administration in both cases). See FIG. 3.


In Canine #1, a 50% maximum reduction in MAP was observed with IV BNP administration adjunctive to phenylepherine administration, whereas a maximum reduction of only 15% was seen with IR BNP administration in the presence of artificially-increased MAP via phenylepherine. See FIGS. 4A and 4B. The relative lack of effect on MAP as compared to IV administration demonstrated the effect of lower systemic BNP levels due to IR administration and renal first-pass effects.


(iv) CONCLUSIONS

IR administration of BNP resulted in approximately 61-75% lower systemic levels than the IV administration of the same dose; thus, a significant renal first-pass effect was demonstrated in keeping with the experimental hypothesis. Also demonstrated was a decreased blood pressure effect, a 50% maximal reduction with IV administration versus a 15% maximal reduction with IR at the same dose, under similar baseline conditions of controlled MAP achieved via administration of phenylepherine. Based on these findings it is likely that IR administration of BNP (and other natriuretic peptides) allows for increased renal effects by increasing the local dose while at the same time reducing systemic side effects, because renal first-pass effects reduce systemic exposure to the drug. This provides a significant clinical benefit for patients for whom the effective dose is limited due to hypotensive or other side effects.


Various modifications and variations of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the claims. All publications, patents and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: placing a bifurcated renal infusion catheter within a patient, such that a first distal infusion branch of the catheter is disposed within a first renal artery and a second distal infusion branch of the catheter is disposed within a second renal artery; andlocally administering a natriuretic peptide into both renal arteries of the patient via the bifurcated renal infusion catheter,wherein the patient is at risk of developing or is suffering from at least one condition selected from the group consisting of congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus.
  • 2. The method as in claim 1, wherein the local delivery into both renal arteries occurs simultaneously.
  • 3. The method as in claim 1, wherein the peptide is administered under conditions selected to reduce the risk of systemic side effects including hypotension.
  • 4. The method as in claim 1, wherein the peptide is delivered in form of a drug or pharmaceutical composition.
  • 5. The method as in claim 4, wherein the drug is delivered in bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg.
  • 6. The method as in claim 4, wherein the drug is delivered via continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min.
  • 7. The method as in claim 4, wherein the drug is delivered through a bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg in combination with continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min.
  • 8. The method as in claim 1, wherein the natriuretic peptide is selected from the group consisting of BNP, ANP, and CNP.
  • 9. The method of treating a patient comprising: bilaterally cannulating both renal arteries of a patient with a bifurcated renal infusion catheter, such that a first distal infusion branch of the infusion catheter is disposed within a first renal artery of the patient and a second distal infusion branch of the infusion catheter is disposed within a second renal artery of the patient; andlocally administering a natriuretic peptide into both renal arteries of the patient via a bifurcated renal infusion catheter,wherein the patient is at risk of developing or is suffering from at least one condition selected from the group consisting of congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus.
  • 10. The method as in claim 9, wherein the patient is at risk of developing at least one condition selected from the group consisting of congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus.
  • 11. The method as in claim 9, wherein the patient is suffering from least one condition selected from the group consisting of congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus.
  • 12. The method as in claim 9, wherein the peptide is administered under conditions selected to reduce the risk of systemic side effects including hypotension.
  • 13. The method as in claim 9, wherein the peptide is delivered in form of a drug or pharmaceutical composition.
  • 14. The method as in claim 13, wherein the drug is delivered in bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg.
  • 15. The method as in claim 13, wherein the drug is delivered via continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min.
  • 16. The method as in claim 13, wherein the drug is delivered through a bolus form at a dosage of about 1 to 5 mcg/kg in combination with continuous administration at a dosage of about 0.005 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min.
  • 17. The method as in claim 9, wherein the natriuretic peptide is selected from the group consisting of BNP, ANP, and CNP.
  • 18. The method of treating a patient comprising: locally administering a natriuretic peptide into both renal arteries of the patient via a bifurcated renal infusion catheter,wherein the patient is at risk of developing or is suffering from at least one condition selected from the group consisting of congestive heart failure, dyspnea, elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, chronic renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, cardiorenal syndrome, and diabetes mellitus.
  • 19. The method as in claim 1, wherein the patient is suffering from acute renal failure.
  • 20. The method as in claim 1, wherein the patient is at risk of developing acute renal failure.
  • 21. The method as in claim 1, wherein the patient has a serum creatinine level above baseline.
  • 22. The method as in claim 9, wherein the patient is suffering from acute renal failure.
  • 23. The method as in claim 9, wherein the patient is at risk of developing acute renal failure.
  • 24. The method as in claim 9, wherein the patient presents a percentage rise in serum creatinine of at least 25% or an absolute rise in serum creatinine of at least 0.5 mg/dl, or both, within 72 hours.
  • 25. The method as in claim 18, wherein the patient is suffering from acute renal failure.
  • 26. The method as in claim 18, wherein the patient is at risk of developing acute renal failure.
  • 27. The method as in claim 18, wherein the patient presents a percentage rise in serum creatinine of at least 25% or an absolute rise in serum creatinine of at least 0.5 mg/dl, or both, within 72 hours.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/571,057, filed May 14, 2004, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Further, the subject matter of this application is related to that of the following provisional, copending and published applications, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, including 60/412,343; 60/412,476; 60/493,100; 60/502,468; 60/543,671; 60/550,632; 60/550,774; 60/508,751; 60/476,347; 60/479,329; 60/486,206; 60/486,349; 60/502,600; 60/502,389; 60/502,399; Ser. Nos. 09/229,390; 10/613,654; 09/562,493; 10/422,645; 10/438,176; 09/724,691; 10/422,624; 10/251,915; 10/636,359; 10/636,801; PCT/US03/21406; PCT/US03/29740; PCT/US04/08571; PCT/US03/29744; PCT/US03/29743; PCT/US03/29585; PCT/US03/29586; PCT/US00/00636; PCT/US01/13686; WO01/083016; WO2004/026370; WO2004/030718; WO2004/026371; WO2004/032791; and WO 2004/034767.

US Referenced Citations (225)
Number Name Date Kind
1696018 Schellberg Dec 1928 A
2499045 Walker et al. Feb 1950 A
3144868 Jascalevich Aug 1964 A
3455298 Anstadt Jul 1969 A
3516408 Montanti Jun 1970 A
3667069 Blackshear et al. Jun 1972 A
3730186 Edmunds, Jr. et al. May 1973 A
3791374 Guarino Feb 1974 A
3841331 Wilder et al. Oct 1974 A
3995623 Blake et al. Dec 1976 A
4248224 Jones Feb 1981 A
4309994 Grunwald Jan 1982 A
4345602 Yoshimura et al. Aug 1982 A
4407271 Schiff Oct 1983 A
4423725 Baran et al. Jan 1984 A
4459977 Pizon et al. Jul 1984 A
4490374 Bandurco et al. Dec 1984 A
4493697 Krause et al. Jan 1985 A
4536893 Parravicini Aug 1985 A
4546759 Solar Oct 1985 A
4554284 Stringer et al. Nov 1985 A
4636195 Wolinsky Jan 1987 A
4685446 Choy Aug 1987 A
4705502 Patel Nov 1987 A
4705507 Boyles Nov 1987 A
4712551 Rayhanabad Dec 1987 A
4714460 Calderon Dec 1987 A
4723939 Anaise Feb 1988 A
4753221 Kensey et al. Jun 1988 A
4781716 Richelsoph Nov 1988 A
4817586 Wampler Apr 1989 A
4834707 Evans May 1989 A
4840172 Augustine et al. Jun 1989 A
4846831 Skillin Jul 1989 A
4861330 Voss Aug 1989 A
4863461 Jarvik Sep 1989 A
4888011 Kung et al. Dec 1989 A
4902272 Milder et al. Feb 1990 A
4902291 Kolff Feb 1990 A
4906229 Wampler Mar 1990 A
4909252 Goldberger Mar 1990 A
4911163 Fina Mar 1990 A
4919647 Nash Apr 1990 A
4925377 Inacio et al. May 1990 A
4925443 Heilman et al. May 1990 A
4927407 Dorman May 1990 A
4927412 Menasche May 1990 A
4938766 Jarvik Jul 1990 A
4950226 Barron Aug 1990 A
4957477 Lundback Sep 1990 A
4964864 Summers et al. Oct 1990 A
4976691 Sahota Dec 1990 A
4976692 Atad Dec 1990 A
4990139 Jang Feb 1991 A
4995864 Bartholomew et al. Feb 1991 A
5002531 Bonzel Mar 1991 A
5002532 Gaiser et al. Mar 1991 A
5044369 Sahota Sep 1991 A
5053023 Martin Oct 1991 A
5059178 Ya Oct 1991 A
5067960 Grandjean Nov 1991 A
5069662 Bodden Dec 1991 A
5069680 Grandjean Dec 1991 A
5073094 Dorman et al. Dec 1991 A
5087244 Wolinsky Feb 1992 A
5089019 Grandjean Feb 1992 A
5098370 Rahat et al. Mar 1992 A
5098442 Grandjean Mar 1992 A
5112301 Fenton, Jr. et al. May 1992 A
5112349 Summers et al. May 1992 A
5119804 Anstadt Jun 1992 A
5129883 Black Jul 1992 A
5131905 Grooters Jul 1992 A
5135474 Swan et al. Aug 1992 A
5158540 Wijay et al. Oct 1992 A
5160323 Andrew Nov 1992 A
5163910 Schwartz et al. Nov 1992 A
5167628 Boyles Dec 1992 A
5180364 Ginsburg Jan 1993 A
5205810 Guiraudon et al. Apr 1993 A
5226888 Arney Jul 1993 A
5256141 Gencheff et al. Oct 1993 A
5257974 Cox Nov 1993 A
5282784 Willard Feb 1994 A
5290227 Pasque Mar 1994 A
5292309 Van Tassel et al. Mar 1994 A
5308319 Ide et al. May 1994 A
5308320 Safar et al. May 1994 A
5312343 Krog et al. May 1994 A
5320604 Walker et al. Jun 1994 A
5326374 Ilbawi et al. Jul 1994 A
5328470 Nabel et al. Jul 1994 A
5332403 Kolff Jul 1994 A
5345927 Bonutti Sep 1994 A
5358519 Grandjean Oct 1994 A
5364337 Guiraudon et al. Nov 1994 A
5370617 Sahota Dec 1994 A
5383840 Heilman et al. Jan 1995 A
5397307 Goodin Mar 1995 A
5411479 Bodden May 1995 A
5421826 Crocker et al. Jun 1995 A
5429584 Chiu Jul 1995 A
5453084 Moses Sep 1995 A
5464449 Ryan et al. Nov 1995 A
5476453 Mehta Dec 1995 A
5478331 Helflin et al. Dec 1995 A
5484385 Rishton Jan 1996 A
5505701 Anaya Fernandez de Lomana Apr 1996 A
5509428 Dunlop Apr 1996 A
5536250 Klein et al. Jul 1996 A
5558617 Heilman et al. Sep 1996 A
5569296 Marin et al. Oct 1996 A
5599306 Klein et al. Feb 1997 A
5609628 Keranen Mar 1997 A
5613949 Miraki Mar 1997 A
5613980 Chauhan Mar 1997 A
5617878 Taheri Apr 1997 A
5643171 Bradshaw et al. Jul 1997 A
5643215 Fuhrman et al. Jul 1997 A
5669924 Shaknovich Sep 1997 A
5702343 Alferness Dec 1997 A
5713853 Clark et al. Feb 1998 A
5713860 Kaplan et al. Feb 1998 A
5720735 Dorros Feb 1998 A
5755779 Horiguchi May 1998 A
5762599 Sohn Jun 1998 A
5766151 Valley et al. Jun 1998 A
5776190 Jarvik Jul 1998 A
5797876 Spears et al. Aug 1998 A
5807311 Palestrant Sep 1998 A
5807895 Stratton et al. Sep 1998 A
5817046 Glickman Oct 1998 A
5902229 Tsitllik et al. May 1999 A
5902336 Mishkin May 1999 A
5913852 Magram Jun 1999 A
5928132 Leschinsky Jul 1999 A
5935924 Bunting et al. Aug 1999 A
5968013 Smith et al. Oct 1999 A
5971910 Tsitlik et al. Oct 1999 A
5984955 Wisselink Nov 1999 A
6001079 Pourchez Dec 1999 A
6013054 Jiun Yan Jan 2000 A
6039721 Johnson et al. Mar 2000 A
6068629 Haissaguerre et al. May 2000 A
6077256 Mann Jun 2000 A
6086527 Talpade Jul 2000 A
6086557 Morejohn et al. Jul 2000 A
6096073 Webster et al. Aug 2000 A
6117117 Mauch Sep 2000 A
6117156 Richter et al. Sep 2000 A
6142973 Carleton et al. Nov 2000 A
6143002 Vietmeier Nov 2000 A
6156016 Maginot Dec 2000 A
6165120 Scheich, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6190349 Ash et al. Feb 2001 B1
6210380 Mauch Apr 2001 B1
6251133 Richter et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261273 Ruiz Jul 2001 B1
6261316 Shaolian et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287277 Yan Sep 2001 B1
6287608 Levin et al. Sep 2001 B1
6325826 Vardi et al. Dec 2001 B1
6387037 Boiling et al. May 2002 B1
6390969 Boiling et al. May 2002 B1
6468241 Gelfand et al. Oct 2002 B1
6475208 Mauch Nov 2002 B2
6482211 Choi Nov 2002 B1
6494875 Mauch Dec 2002 B1
6508787 Erbel et al. Jan 2003 B2
6514226 Levin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6533747 Polschegg et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540779 Richter et al. Apr 2003 B2
6592567 Levin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595959 Statienko et al. Jul 2003 B1
6669718 Besselink Dec 2003 B2
6699231 Sterman et al. Mar 2004 B1
6733474 Kusleika May 2004 B2
6749598 Keren et al. Jun 2004 B1
6749628 Callol et al. Jun 2004 B1
6884258 Vardi et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887258 Denison et al. May 2005 B2
6911039 Shiu et al. Jun 2005 B2
6945992 Goodson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6994700 Elkins et al. Feb 2006 B2
7104981 Elkins et al. Sep 2006 B2
7381204 Wilson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7470252 Mickley et al. Dec 2008 B2
20010029349 Leschinsky Oct 2001 A1
20010031907 Downey et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020022857 Goldsteen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020090388 Humes et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091355 Hayden Jul 2002 A1
20020165574 Ressemann et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020169413 Keren et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030050600 Ressemann et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069468 Bolling et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100919 Hopkins et al. May 2003 A1
20030144636 Liu Jul 2003 A1
20030153898 Schon et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030181856 Goldman Sep 2003 A1
20030220664 Petrick et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040002730 Denison et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040044302 Bernard et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059179 Maguire et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064089 Kesten et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040097900 Keren et al. May 2004 A1
20040111148 Goodson Jun 2004 A1
20040117003 Ouriel et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040167415 Gelfand et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167463 Zawacki et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040254236 Dong et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050027305 Shiu et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050197624 Goodson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050245882 Elkins et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050245892 Elkins et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267010 Goodson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060030814 Valencia et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036218 Goodson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047266 Elkins et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069323 Elkins et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060079836 Holman et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079859 Elkins et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060149350 Patel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060259066 Euteneuer Nov 2006 A1
20070053904 Kirst et al. Mar 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
4324637 Jul 1993 DE
654283 Nov 1994 EP
884064 May 1998 EP
2239675 Jul 1994 GB
WO 9711737 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9803213 Jan 1998 WO
WO 9817347 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9852639 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9933407 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9922784 May 1999 WO
WO 9951286 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0041612 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0183016 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0137882 May 2001 WO
WO 0141861 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0197687 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197717 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197878 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0197879 Dec 2001 WO
WO 2004026370 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004032791 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004032791 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2005002660 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005014100 Feb 2005 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050267010 A1 Dec 2005 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60571057 May 2004 US