Bi-planar instrument for bone cutting and joint realignment procedure

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11627954
  • Patent Number
    11,627,954
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 7, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A technique for correcting a bone deformity, such as a bunion, may be performed using an instrument that defines a spacer body connected to a fulcrum. The spacer body portion of the instrument can be inserted into a joint space between opposed bone ends. The fulcrum body can be inserted between adjacent metatarsals. An angle set between the spacer body and fulcrum body can help properly position both features within different joint spaces for ensuring that subsequent steps of the surgical procedure are properly performed and instrumentation is appropriately aligned.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to surgical devices and, more particularly, to surgical devices for assisting in bone cutting and/or realignment techniques.


BACKGROUND

Bones within the human body, such as bones in the foot, may be anatomically misaligned. For example, one common type of bone deformity is hallux valgus, which is a progressive foot deformity in which the first metatarsophalangeal joint is affected and is often accompanied by significant functional disability and foot pain. The metatarsophalangeal joint is medially deviated, resulting in an abduction of the first metatarsal while the phalanges adduct. This often leads to development of soft tissue and a bony prominence on the medial side of the foot, which is called a bunion.


Surgical intervention may be used to correct a bunion deformity. A variety of different surgical procedures exist to correct bunion deformities and may involve removing the abnormal bony enlargement on the first metatarsal and/or attempting to realign the first metatarsal relative to the adjacent metatarsal. Surgical instruments that can facilitate efficient, accurate, and reproducible clinical results are useful for practitioners performing bone realignment techniques.


SUMMARY

In general, this disclosure is directed to an instrument that can be used in a surgical bone cutting and/or realignment procedure. The instrument can include a spacer body connected to a fulcrum body. The spacer body and fulcrum body may be positionable in adjacent joint spaces, with a connecting member between the spacer body and fulcrum body helping to control the relative position of the spacer body and fulcrum body when inserted into respective joint spaces.


For example, the spacer body can be positioned in a joint space between opposed bone ends, such as a joint space between a metatarsal and an opposed cuneiform. In some implementations, the metatarsal is a first metatarsal and the opposed cuneiform is a medial cuneiform. In either case, the spacer body may define a first portion positionable in the joint space between opposed bone ends and a second portion that extends above (e.g., dorsally) from the joint space. The second portion of the spacer body can be connected to a bone preparation guide. The bone preparation guide may be removable from and engageable with the spacer body (e.g., by inserting the bone preparation guide on the spacer body after the spacer body is inserted into the joint space). Alternatively, the bone preparation guide can be permanently coupled to the spacer body (e.g., to define a unitary structure). In either case, the bone preparation guide may define one or more guide surfaces for guiding a bone preparation instrument to prepare the ends of adjacent bones (e.g., to prepare an end of the metatarsal and/or an end of the opposed cuneiform). For example, the bone preparation guide may define at least one cutting slot positioned over the metatarsal for guiding a saw blade to cut an end of the metatarsal and at least one cutting slot positioned over the opposed cuneiform for guiding a saw blade to cut an end of the opposed cuneiform.


The instrument also includes a fulcrum body coupled to the spacer body. The fulcrum body may be configured (e.g., sized and/or shaped) to be positioned in an intermetatarsal space between adjacent metatarsals, such as in the intermetatarsal space between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. The fulcrum body may define a fulcrum, or pivot surface, about which the metatarsal can rotate to realign a position of the metatarsal relative to the opposing cuneiform and/or adjacent metatarsal. For example, the fulcrum body may define a pivot surface about which a proximal base of the metatarsal can pivot as an intermetatarsal angle is closed between the metatarsal and the adjacent metatarsal. This may help prevent the base of the metatarsal from shifting laterally, such as by compressing against the adjacent metatarsal, as the metatarsal is realigned.


In some configurations, the spacer body is coupled to the fulcrum body with a bridge member. The bridge member may transition from one plane (e.g., generally in the frontal plane) in which the spacer body is positioned to a second plane (e.g., generally in the sagittal plane) in which the fulcrum body is positioned. For example, the bridge member may define a corner (e.g., with an interior angle ranging from 60 degrees to 120 degrees, such as from 80 degrees to 100 degrees, or approximately 90 degrees) operatively connecting the spacer body to the fulcrum body. In use, the bridge member can be positioned against a corner of the metatarsal being realigned, such as a proximal-lateral corner/surface of the metatarsal. When so positioned, the spacer body may be positioned in the joint space between the metatarsal and opposed cuneiform while the fulcrum body may be positioned in the joint space between the metatarsal and adjacent metatarsal. The bridge member may help establish a fixed position between the spacer body and fulcrum body and/or prevent the spacer body and fulcrum body from shifting relative to each other and/or in their respective joint spaces during the surgical procedure. This can help ensure that the spacer body and fulcrum body are appropriately positioned for subsequent procedure steps performed using the spacer body and fulcrum body (e.g., performing a bone preparation step using a bone preparation guide attached to the spacer body and/or realigning a metatarsal by pivoting about the fulcrum body).


In one example, a bi-planar instrument for a bone cutting and joint realignment procedure is described. The instrument includes a spacer body configured to be inserted into a joint space between a metatarsal and an opposed cuneiform of a foot. The instrument also includes a fulcrum body coupled to the spacer body, the fulcrum body being configured to be inserted in an intermetatarsal space between the metatarsal and an adjacent metatarsal.


In another example, a method is described that includes inserting a spacer body into a joint space between a metatarsal and an opposed cuneiform of a foot. The method also includes inserting a fulcrum body coupled to the spacer between the metatarsal and an adjacent metatarsal. The method further involves preparing an end of the metatarsal using a bone preparation guide aligned with the spacer to guide a bone preparation instrument and preparing an end of the opposing cuneiform using the bone preparation guide to guide a bone preparation instrument. In addition, the method includes moving the metatarsal relative to the adjacent metatarsal in at least a transverse plane, thereby pivoting the metatarsal about the fulcrum body and reducing an intermetatarsal angle between the metatarsal and the adjacent metatarsal.


The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B are front views of a foot showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example frontal plane rotational misalignment position, respectively.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are top views of a foot showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example transverse plane misalignment position, respectively.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are side views of a foot showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example sagittal plane misalignment position, respectively.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example bone positioning operation in which a bi-planar instrument is positioned in a first joint space and an intersecting second joint space.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example configuration of the bi-planar instrument of FIGS. 4A and 4B.



FIGS. 5C and 5D are perspective and sectional views, respectively, showing an example configuration of a fulcrum body defining a concave bone contacting surface.



FIGS. 5E and 5F are perspective and sectional views, respectively, showing an example configuration of a fulcrum body defining a convex bone contacting surface.



FIGS. 6A and 6B are perspective and top views, respectively showing an example bone preparation guide that may be used as part of a surgical procedure involving a bi-planar instrument.



FIGS. 7A and 7B are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example configuration of a bi-planar instrument in which a spacer body is detachable from and attachable to a fulcrum body.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are front and rear perspective views, respectively, of an example configuration of a bi-planar instrument configured with a hinged connection.



FIGS. 9A-9D illustrate example relative rotational positions between a spacer body and a fulcrum body for the example bi-planar instrument illustrated in FIGS. 8A and 8B.



FIGS. 10A-10C are illustrations of an example system that includes a bi-planar instrument and a bone preparation guide, where the bone preparation guide is sized to move relative to the spacer body of the bi-planar instrument.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In general, the present disclosure is directed to an instrument that includes a spacer body and fulcrum body that can be used in a surgical procedure, such as bone realignment procedure. Example procedures in which the fulcrum structures may be used include a bone alignment, osteotomy, fusion procedure, and/or other procedures where one or more bones are operated upon and/or realigned relative to one or more other bones. Such a procedure can be performed, for example, on bones (e.g., adjacent bones separated by a joint or different portions of a single bone) in the foot or hand, where bones are relatively smaller compared to bones in other parts of the human anatomy. In one example, a procedure utilizing an instrument that includes two bodies joined together by a bridge member can be performed to correct an alignment between a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal) and a second metatarsal and/or a cuneiform (e.g., a medial, or first, cuneiform), such as in a bunion correction surgery. An example of such a procedure is a Lapidus procedure (also known as a first tarsal-metatarsal fusion). While the example instruments of the disclosure are generally described as being useful for insertion into a space between opposed bone ends transitioning into an intermetatarsal space, the instruments may be used in any desired application and the disclosure is not limited in this respect.



FIGS. 1-3 are different views of a foot 200 showing example anatomical misalignments that may occur and be corrected using a fulcrum according to the present disclosure. Such misalignment may be caused by a hallux valgus (bunion), natural growth deformity, or other condition causing anatomical misalignment. FIGS. 1A and 1B are front views of foot 200 showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example frontal plane rotational misalignment position, respectively. FIGS. 2A and 2B are top views of foot 200 showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example transverse plane misalignment position, respectively. FIGS. 3A and 3B are side views of foot 200 showing a normal first metatarsal position and an example sagittal plane misalignment position, respectively. While FIGS. 1B, 2B, and 3B show each respective planar misalignment in isolation, in practice, a metatarsal may be misaligned in any two of the three planes or even all three planes. Accordingly, it should be appreciated that the depiction of a single plane misalignment in each of FIGS. 1B, 2B, and 3B is for purposes of illustration and a metatarsal may be misaligned in multiple planes that is desirably corrected.


With reference to FIGS. 1A and 2A, foot 200 is composed of multiple bones including a first metatarsal 210, a second metatarsal 212, a third metatarsal 214, a fourth metatarsal 216, and a fifth metatarsal 218. The metatarsals are connected distally to phalanges 220 and, more particularly, each to a respective proximal phalanx. The first metatarsal 210 is connected proximally to a medial cuneiform 222, while the second metatarsal 212 is connected proximally to an intermediate cuneiform 224 and the third metatarsal is connected proximally to lateral cuneiform 226. The fourth and fifth metatarsals 216, 218 are connected proximally to the cuboid bone 228. The joint 230 between a metatarsal and respective cuneiform (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222) is referred to as the tarsometatarsal (“TMT”) joint. The joint 232 between a metatarsal and respective proximal phalanx is referred to as a metatarsophalangeal joint. The angle 234 between adjacent metatarsals (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212) is referred to as the intermetatarsal angle (“IMA”).


As noted, FIG. 1A is a frontal plane view of foot 200 showing a typical position for first metatarsal 210. The frontal plane, which is also known as the coronal plane, is generally considered any vertical plane that divides the body into anterior and posterior sections. On foot 200, the frontal plane is a plane that extends vertically and is perpendicular to an axis extending proximally to distally along the length of the foot. FIG. 1A shows first metatarsal 210 in a typical rotational position in the frontal plane. FIG. 1B shows first metatarsal 210 with a frontal plane rotational deformity characterized by a rotational angle 236 relative to ground, as indicated by line 238.



FIG. 2A is a top view of foot 200 showing a typical position of first metatarsal 210 in the transverse plane. The transverse plane, which is also known as the horizontal plane, axial plane, or transaxial plane, is considered any plane that divides the body into superior and inferior parts. On foot 200, the transverse plane is a plane that extends horizontally and is perpendicular to an axis extending dorsally to plantarly (top to bottom) across the foot. FIG. 2A shows first metatarsal 210 with a typical IMA 234 in the transverse plane. FIG. 2B shows first metatarsal 210 with a transverse plane rotational deformity characterized by a greater IMA caused by the distal end of first metatarsal 210 being pivoted medially relative to the second metatarsal 212.



FIG. 3A is a side view of foot 200 showing a typical position of first metatarsal 210 in the sagittal plane. The sagittal plane is a plane parallel to the sagittal suture which divides the body into right and left halves. On foot 200, the sagittal plane is a plane that extends vertically and is perpendicular to an axis extending proximally to distally along the length of the foot. FIG. 3A shows first metatarsal 210 with a typical rotational position in the sagittal plane. FIG. 3B shows first metatarsal 210 with a sagittal plane rotational deformity characterized by a rotational angle 240 relative to ground, as indicated by line 238.


A bi-planar instrument according to the disclosure can define a spacer body extending a medial to lateral direction (e.g., parallel to the frontal plane) of the foot that is coupled to a fulcrum body extending in a proximal to distal direction (e.g., parallel to sagittal plane) of the foot. A connecting member can couple the spacer body to the fulcrum body and transition from the frontal plane to the sagittal plane. In some examples, the connecting member can conform to (e.g., contact) a region of the metatarsal being realigned on the proximal end face of the metatarsal and also on a proximal end of a lateral side of the metatarsal. The bi-planar instrument can be used as part of a bone positioning technique to correct an anatomical misalignment of a bone or bones. In some applications, the technique involves realigning a metatarsal relative to an adjacent cuneiform and/or adjacent metatarsal. The metatarsal undergoing realignment may be anatomically misaligned in the frontal plane, transverse plane, and/or sagittal plane, as illustrated and discussed with respect to FIGS. 1-3 above. Accordingly, realignment may involve releasing the misaligned metatarsal or portion thereof for realignment and thereafter realigning the metatarsal in one or more planes, two or more planes, or all three planes. After suitably realigning the metatarsal, the metatarsal can be fixated to hold and maintain the realigned positioned.


While a metatarsal can have a variety of anatomically aligned and misaligned positions, in some examples, the term “anatomically aligned position” means that an angle of a long axis of first metatarsal 210 relative to the long axis of second metatarsal 212 is about 10 degrees or less in the transverse plane and/or sagittal plane. In certain embodiments, anatomical misalignment can be corrected in both the transverse plane and the frontal plane.


In the transverse plane, a normal IMA 234 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 is less than about 9 degrees. An IMA 234 of between about 9 degrees and about 13 degrees is considered a mild misalignment of the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. An IMA 234 of greater than about 16 degrees is considered a severe misalignment of the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal.


In some applications, a bi-planar instrument is used as part of a realignment technique to anatomically align first metatarsal 210 or a portion thereof by reducing the IMA from over 10 degrees to about 10 degrees or less (e.g., to an IMA of about 1-5 degrees), including to negative angles of about −5 degrees or until interference with the second metatarsal, by positioning the first metatarsal at a different angle with respect to the second metatarsal.


With respect to the frontal plane, a normal first metatarsal will be positioned such that its crista prominence is generally perpendicular to the ground and/or its sesamoid bones are generally parallel to the ground and positioned under the metatarsal. This position can be defined as a metatarsal rotation of 0 degrees. In a misaligned first metatarsal, the metatarsal is axially rotated between about 4 degrees to about 30 degrees or more. In some embodiments, a bi-planar instrument is used as part of a realignment technique to anatomically align the metatarsal by reducing the metatarsal rotation from about 4 degrees or more to less than 4 degrees (e.g., to about 0 to 2 degrees) by rotating the metatarsal with respect to the medial cuneiform.


A bi-planar instrument that defines a spacer body coupled to a fulcrum body according to the disclosure may be useful to provide a unitary structure (e.g., prior to or after being assembled) that can be positioned between two adjacent, intersecting joint spaces: a first joint space between opposed ends of a metatarsal and cuneiform and an intermetatarsal space between adjacent metatarsals. The spacer body can include a first portion insertable into the joint space and a second portion that projects above the joint space. The second portion projecting above the joint space can be coupled to a bone preparation guide, thereby facilitating positioning of the bone preparation guide over the metatarsal and/or cuneiform between which the spacer body is positioned. The fulcrum body can establish and/or maintain space between adjacent bones being moved, preventing lateral translation or base shift of the bones during rotation and/or pivoting.


For example, the bi-planar instrument can include a spacer body positionable in the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222. The spacer body can be coupled to a bone preparation guide. The bone preparation guide may include a receiving slot into which a projecting end of the spacer body is positioned, thereby orienting the bone preparation guide relative to the joint space via the spacer body positioned therein. The bone preparation guide may include at least one cutting slot positioned over an end of first metatarsal 210 and/or an end of medial cuneiform 222 to be cut, such as at least one metatarsal side cutting slot positionable over an end of first metatarsal 210 to be cut and at least one cuneiform cutting slot positionable over an end of medial cuneiform 222 to be cut.


The bi-planar instrument can also include a fulcrum body positionable in a joint space between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212. The fulcrum body can be inserted in the notch between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 at the base of the metatarsals (e.g., adjacent respective cuneiforms) before moving the first metatarsal, e.g., to help avoid the proximal-most base of the first metatarsal 210 from shifting toward the proximal-most base of the second 212. The fulcrum body can provide a point about which first metatarsal 210 can rotate and/or pivot while helping minimize or avoid base compression between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. In addition, use of the fulcrum body may cause first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 to be better angled relative to guide slots positioned over the end faces of the bones (of the bone preparation guide engaged with the spacer body), providing a better cut angle through the guide slots than without use of the fulcrum body. This can help reduce or eliminate unwanted spring-back, or return positioning, of first metatarsal 210 after initial realignment of the metatarsal.



FIGS. 4A and 4B (referred to collectively as FIG. 4) are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example bone positioning operation in which a bi-planar instrument 10 is positioned in a first joint space and an intersecting second joint space, where a bone forming the first and second joint spaces is being realigned relative to one or more adjacent bones. In particular, FIG. 4 illustrates a bi-planar instrument 10 having a spacer body 12 coupled to a fulcrum body 14 via a connecting or bridge member 16. Spacer body 12 is positioned at an intersection between an end of first metatarsal 210 and opposed medial cuneiform 222. Fulcrum body 14 is positioned between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212. Bi-planar instrument 10 may optionally be used in conjunction with other surgical devices, such as a bone positioning guide 20 and a bone preparation guide 30 (FIG. 6). Additional details on example bone positioning guides, bone preparation guides, and related techniques are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/981,335, filed Dec. 28, 2015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/236,464, filed Aug. 14, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.


As shown in the example of FIG. 4, spacer body 12 can be positioned between opposed end of adjacent bones, such as opposed ends of a metatarsal (e.g., first metatarsal 210) and cuneiform (e.g., medial cuneiform 222) separated by a joint space. Spacer body 12 can define a length configured to be inserted into the joint space between the two bones (e.g., with at least a portion of the body projecting dorsally above the joint space), a thickness configured to extend between the metatarsal and the opposed cuneiform (e.g., with first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 contacting opposed sides of the spacer body), and a width configured to extend in a medial to lateral direction across the foot.


Spacer body 12 can be positioned at any suitable location across the joint space (e.g., in the front plane). The specific positioning of spacer body 12 in use may be established by bridge member 16 coupled to fulcrum body 14. For example, when bi-planar instrument 10 is inserted into the joint space, bridge member 16 may contact a proximal-lateral corner or region of first metatarsal 210. This can limit the extent to which spacer body 12 can shift medially across the joint space, helping to fix the spacer body in the medial to lateral direction (e.g., in the frontal plane). In other examples, bi-planar instrument 10 can be inserting into the joint space without the corner defined by bridge member 16 contacting a bone (e.g., first metatarsal).


Although not illustrated in FIG. 4, in different examples, spacer body 12 can be engageable with and separable from bone preparation guide 30 or may be integral with (e.g., permanently coupled to) the bone preparation guide. The positioning of spacer body 12 in the joint space can dictate the positioning of bone preparation guide 30 coupled thereto and, correspondingly, the guiding of a bone preparation instrument facilitated by the bone preparation guide.


Bi-planar instrument 10 also includes fulcrum body 14. Fulcrum body 14 may be positioned distally of a bone positioning guide 20 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 or, in other applications, distally of the guide. As illustrated, fulcrum body 14 of bi-planar instrument 10 is shown proximally of bone positioning guide 20, with the fulcrum body being positioned in the joint space between the first metatarsal and second metatarsal (e.g., at the ends of the first and second metatarsals abutting the medial and intermediate cuneiform bones, respectively). In still other examples, fulcrum body 14 can be positioned in the intermetatarsal space between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 without using bone positioning guide 20 and/or bone preparation guide 30 (FIG. 6).


In use, the clinician can insert fulcrum body 16 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 (or other adjacent bones, when not performing a metatarsal realignment) at any time prior to moving the first metatarsal (e.g., by actuating bone positioning guide 20 or other means of manipulating the bone). In one embodiment, the clinician prepares the joint being operated upon to release soft tissues and/or excise the plantar flare from the base of the first metatarsal 210. Either before or after installing bone positioning guide 20 over adjacent bones, the clinician inserts bi-planar instrument 10 in the joint spaces. The clinician can insert spacer body 12 in the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 and also insert fulcrum body 14 in the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212.


After inserting bi-planar instrument 10, the clinician can actuate bone positioning guide 20. In the case of a left foot as shown in FIG. 4, actuation of bone positioning guide 20 causes the first metatarsal 210 to rotate counterclockwise in the frontal plane (from the perspective of a patient) and also pivot in the transverse plane about the fulcrum body. In the case of a right foot (not shown), actuation causes the first metatarsal to rotate clockwise in the frontal plane (from the perspective of a patient) and also pivot in the transverse plane about the fulcrum. Thus, for both feet, actuation of bone positioning guide 20 can supinate the first metatarsal in the frontal plane and pivot the first metatarsal in the transverse plane about fulcrum body 14.


Before or after actuating bone positioning guide 20 (when used), the clinician can engage a bone preparation guide with a portion of spacer body 12 projecting from the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222. Spacer body 12 may have a length effective to engage a bone preparation guide thereto. In some implementations, the clinician installs a separate, removable bone preparation guide 30 onto spacer body 12 after inserting bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint spaces. The clinician can attach the bone preparation guide 30 before or after attaching bone positioning guide 20. The clinician can use bone preparation guide 30 to guide a bone preparation instrument, such as a cutting blade, to prepare an end of first metatarsal 210 and an opposed end of medial cuneiform 222. The clinician can prepare one or both ends of the bones before and/or after engaging bone preparation guide 20 to move first metatarsal 210 in at least one plane, such as the transverse plane and/or frontal plane.



FIGS. 5A and 5B (collectively referred to as FIG. 5) are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example configuration of bi-planar instrument 10. As shown in this example, instrument 10 includes spacer body 12 coupled to fulcrum body 14. In some examples, spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 are intersecting body members coupled together without an intervening coupling member. In other examples, such as the example illustrated in FIG. 5, an intermediate coupling member 16 joins spacer body 12 to fulcrum body 14.


Coupling member 16 may be in the form of a bridge extending between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14. In use, spacer body 12 may be configured to extend in a frontal plane of the foot, between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222. Fulcrum body 14 may be configured to extend in a sagittal plane of the foot, between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212. Bridge member 16 can define a bended and/or angled region of bi-planar instrument 10 that transitions from the frontal plane to the sagittal plane. For example, bridge member may be configured to extend from a proximal side of first metatarsal 210 to a lateral side of the metatarsal. By coupling spacer body 12 to fulcrum body 14 via bridge member 16, the position and orientation of the two bodies relative to each other and/or relative to first metatarsal 210 may be fixed. This can help ensure the proper positioning of the respective bodies in use.


In general, spacer body 12 may define a length configured to be inserted into the joint space, a thickness configured to extend between the bone defining the joint space (e.g., metatarsal and the opposed cuneiform), and a width configured to extend in a medial to lateral direction partially or fully across the joint space. Spacer body 12 may define a first portion 40 configured to extend at least partially into the joint space between the metatarsal and the opposed cuneiform and a second portion 42 configured to extend above the joint space. Second portion 42 can be configured to engage a receiving cavity of a bone preparation guide or can be integrally attached to the bone preparation guide.


Fulcrum body 14 can define a length configured to be inserted into the intermetatarsal space, a thickness configured to extend between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212, and a width configured to extend in the proximal to distal direction across the foot. The thickness of fulcrum body 14 may be tapered toward the leading end to facilitate insertion of fulcrum body 14 into a space between adjacent metatarsals.


In some examples, instrument 10 includes a handle 44. Handle 44 is illustrated as being operatively connected to fulcrum body 14 although can be connected to and extend from spacer body 12 in addition to or in lieu of fulcrum body 14. Handle 44 may be any structure projecting proximally from bi-planar instrument 10 (e.g., from fulcrum body 14) that can provide a gripping location for the instrument during use. In some examples, such as the example illustrated in FIG. 5, handle 44 can project angularly away from fulcrum body 14 to define a tissue retraction space. The tissue retraction space may be a region bounded on one side by fulcrum body 14 and one side of handle 44. In use, body fulcrum 14 may be inserted into an intermetatarsal space with handle 44 extending out of the surgical incision and over an epidermal layer with tissue captured in the tissue retraction space. For example, fulcrum body 14 may be inserted into an intermetatarsal space with handle 44 projecting toward the lateral side of the foot being operated upon. The tissue retraction space may help retract tissue and push the tissue laterally away from a first metatarsal and/or medial cuneiform being operated upon.


To form a tissue retraction space, handle 44 may project away from fulcrum body 14, e.g., linearly at a zero-degree angle and/or laterally at a non-zero-degree angle. The specific angular orientation of the handle 44 relative to the body 14 may vary. However, in some examples, handle 44 is oriented relative to the fulcrum body 14 so a handle axis intersects an axis extending along the length of the fulcrum body at an acute angle ranging from 5 degrees to 85 degrees, such as from 20 degrees to 75 degrees, or from 35 degrees to 55 degrees.


In general, bi-planar instrument 10 can be fabricated from any suitable materials. In different examples, the instrument may be fabricated from metal, a polymeric material, or a hybrid form of multiple metals and/or polymeric materials. In addition, although spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 are generally illustrated as having rectangular cross-sectional shapes, one or both bodies can define a different generally polygonal cross-sectional shape (e.g., square, hexagonal) and/or generally arcuate cross-sectional shape (e.g., circular, elliptical).


For example, while spacer body 12 and/or fulcrum body 14 may define a planar face contacting a bone, one or both bodies may alternatively have non-planar faces contacting the bone. FIGS. 5C and 5D are perspective and sectional views, respectively, showing an example configuration of fulcrum body 14 defining a concave bone contacting surface. FIGS. 5E and 5F are perspective and sectional views, respectively, showing an example configuration of fulcrum body 14 defining a convex bone contacting surface.


As still another example, fulcrum body 14 of bi-planar instrument 10 may be angled in the sagittal plane, e.g., such that the plantar end of the fulcrum body extends farther medially than the dorsal end of the fulcrum body or, alternatively, the plantar end of the fulcrum body extend farther laterally than the dorsal end of the fulcrum body. Angling fulcrum body 14 in the sagittal plane may be useful to help dorsiflex or plantarflex the metatarsal being moved, e.g., by providing an angled fulcrum surface tending to redirect the metatarsal in the sagittal plane. The foregoing discussion of example fulcrum body shape and/or profile configurations can be employed in a standalone fulcrum device in the techniques described herein (e.g., without using an attached spacer body).


In some examples, bi-planar instrument 10 (e.g., spacer body 12, fulcrum body 14, bridge member 16) will be formed as a unitary structure, e.g., by milling, casting, or molding the components to be permanently and structurally integrated together. In other examples, one or more the features may be fabricated as separate components that are subsequently joined together.


In some examples, bi-planar instrument 10 is used as part of a metatarsal realignment procedure in which a metatarsal is realigned relative to an adjacent cuneiform and/or metatarsal in one or more planes, such as two or three planes. Additional details on example bone realignment techniques and devices with which instrument 10 may be used are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,622,805, titled “BONE POSITIONING AND PREPARING GUIDE SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” filed on Dec. 28, 2015 and issued Apr. 18, 2017, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,936,994, titled “BONE POSITIONING GUIDE,” filed on Jul. 14, 2016 and issued on Apr. 10, 2018, and US Patent Publication No. 2017/0042599 titled “TARSAL-METATARSAL JOINT PROCEDURE UTILIZING FULCRUM,” filed on Aug. 14, 2016. The entire contents of each of these documents are hereby incorporated by reference.



FIGS. 6A and 6B (collectively referred to as FIG. 6) are perspective and top views, respectively showing an example bone preparation guide 30 that may be used as part of a surgical procedure involving bi-planar instrument 10. In some examples, bone preparation guide 30 includes a body 32 defining a first guide surface 34 to define a first preparing plane and a second guide surface 36 to define a second preparing plane. A tissue removing instrument (e.g., a saw, rotary bur, osteotome, etc., not shown) can be aligned with the surfaces to remove tissue (e.g., remove cartilage or bone and/or make cuts to bone). The first and second guide surfaces 34, 36 can be spaced from each other by a distance, (e.g., between about 2 millimeters and about 10 millimeters, such as between about 4 and about 7 millimeters). In different configurations, the first and second guide surfaces can be parallel to each other or angled relative to each other, such that cuts to adjacent bones using the guide surfaces will be generally parallel or angled relative to each other.


In some configurations, the first and second guide surfaces 34, 36 are bounded by opposed surfaces to define guide slots. Each slot can be sized to receive a tissue removing instrument to prepare the bone ends. In either case, an opening 38 may be defined in body 32 of bone preparation guide 30 for receiving spacer body 12. In use, a clinician can insert bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 as well as between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212. The clinician can then insert bone preparation guide 30 on spacer body 12 of the instrument, e.g., by aligning opening 38 with the portion of spacer body 12 projecting dorsally from the joint space. Alternatively, as noted above, bone preparation guide 30 and bi-instrument 10 may be preassembled (e.g., removably coupled together or permanently and fixedly joined together) such that inserting bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint space between adjacent bones simultaneously positions bone preparation guide 30 over one or more bones to be prepared.


In the illustrated example, bone preparation guide 30 extends from a first end positioned over first metatarsal 210 and a second end positioned over medial cuneiform 222. One or both ends of the body can define one or more fixation apertures configured to receive fixation pin(s) for securing bone preparation guide 30 to one or more bones.


Bone preparation facilitated by bone preparation guide 30 can be useful, for instance, to facilitate contact between leading edges of adjacent bones, separated by a joint, or different portions of a single bone, separated by a fracture, such as in a bone alignment and/or fusion procedure. A bone may be prepared using one or more bone preparation techniques. In some applications, a bone is prepared by cutting the bone. The bone may be cut transversely to establish a new bone end facing an opposing bone portion. Additionally or alternatively, the bone may be prepared by morselizing an end of the bone. The bone end can be morselized using any suitable tool, such as a rotary bur, osteotome, or drill. The bone end may be morselized by masticating, fenestrating, crushing, pulping, and/or breaking the bone end into smaller bits to facilitate deformable contact with an opposing bone portion.


During a surgical technique utilizing bi-planar instrument 10, a bone may be moved from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position with respect to another bone. Further, both the end of the moved bone and the facing end of an adjacent end may be prepared for fixation. In some applications, the end of at least one of the moved bone and/or the other bone is prepared after moving the bone into the aligned position. In other applications, the end of at least one of the moved bone and/or the other bone is prepared before moving the bone into the aligned position. In still other applications, the end of one of the moved bone and the other bone is prepared before moving the bone into the aligned position while the end of the opposite facing bone (either the moved bone or the other bone) is prepared after moving the bone into the aligned position.


Movement of one bone relative to another bone can be accomplished using one or more instruments and/or techniques. In some examples, bone movement is accomplished using a bone positioning device, e.g., that applies a force through one or more moving components to one bone, causing the bone to translate and/or rotate in response to the force. This may be accomplished, for example, using a bone positioning guide that includes a bone engagement member, a tip, a mechanism to urge the bone engagement member and the tip towards each other, and an actuator to actuate the mechanism. Additionally or alternatively, bone movement may be accomplished using a compressor-distractor by imparting movement to one bone relative to another bone as the compressor-distractor is positioned on substantially parallel pins, causing the pins to move out of their substantially parallel alignment and resulting in movement of the underlying bones in one plane (e.g., frontal plane, sagittal plane, transverse plane), two or more planes, or all three planes. As yet a further addition or alternative, a clinician may facilitate movement by physically grasping a bone, either through direct contact with the bone or indirectly (e.g., by inserting a K-wire, grasping with a tenaculum, or the like), and moving his hand to move the bone.


When used, the clinician can insert bi-planar instrument 10 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 and between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 (or other adjacent bones, when not performing a first metatarsal realignment) at any time prior to moving the first metatarsal (e.g., by actuating a bone positioning guide or otherwise manipulating the bone). In one embodiment, the clinician prepares the joint being operated upon to release soft tissues and/or excise the plantar flare from the base of the first metatarsal 210. Either before or after installing an optional bone positioning guide over adjacent bones, the clinician inserts the instrument 10 at the joint between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal and at the joint between the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform. The clinician can subsequently actuate bone positioning guide 20 (e.g., when used). As distal portion of first metatarsal can move toward the second metatarsal in the transverse plane to close the IMA, thereby pivoting a proximal portion of the first metatarsal about fulcrum body 14 and reducing the IMA between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. The use of fulcrum body 14 can minimize or eliminate base compression between adjacent bones being operated upon.


The clinician can additionally engage bone preparation guide 30 with spacer body 12 and use the bone preparation guide to prepare an end of first metatarsal 210 and an end of medial cuneiform 222. The clinician may prepare the ends of one or both bones before or after moving the first metatarsal in one or more planes (e.g., using bone preparation guide 30). In either case, the clinician may optionally provisionally fixate the moved position (e.g., by inserting a k-wire or other fixation element) into first metatarsal 210 and an adjacent bone (e.g., second metatarsal 212, medial cuneiform 222). The clinician can remove bone positioning guide 20 and bi-planar instrument 10 from the foot, e.g., before or after optionally provisionally fixating. In either case, the clinician may permanently fixate the prepare bone ends, causing the prepared bone ends to fuse together.


In one example technique, after customary surgical preparation and access, a bone preparation instrument can be inserted into the joint (e.g., first tarsal-metatarsal joint) to release soft tissues and/or excise the plantar flare from the base of the first metatarsal 210. Excising the plantar flare may involve cutting plantar flare off the first metatarsal 210 so the face of the first metatarsal is generally planar. This step helps to mobilize the joint to facilitate a deformity correction. In some embodiments, the dorsal-lateral flare of the first metatarsal may also be excised to create space for the deformity correction (e.g., with respect to rotation of the first metatarsal). In certain embodiments, a portion of the metatarsal base facing the medial cuneiform can be removed during this mobilizing step.


An incision can be made and, if a bone positioning instrument is going to be used, one end (e.g., a tip) of a bone positioning guide 20 inserted on the lateral side of a metatarsal other than the first metatarsal 210, such as the second metatarsal 212. The tip can be positioned proximally at a base of the second metatarsal 212 and a third metatarsal 294 interface.


Before or after attaching the optional bone positioning guide 20, the clinician can insert bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint. The clinician can position spacer body 12 into the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 while simultaneously positioning fulcrum body 14 in the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212.


When bi-planar instrument 10 includes bridge member 16, the bridge member can be positioned in contact with a proximal-lateral corner of first metatarsal 210, helping to appropriately position spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 relative to each other. For example, bridge member 16 may position spacer body 12 substantially centered or on a lateral half of the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222. Bridge member 16 may further position fulcrum body 14 in the notch between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 212 at the base of the metatarsals (e.g., adjacent respective cuneiform). Fulcrum body 14 can provide a point about which first metatarsal 210 can rotate and/or pivot while helping minimize or avoid base compression between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal.


In applications utilizing bone positioning guide 20, one or more movable features of the bone positioning guide can be moved to reduce the angle (transverse plane angle between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal) and rotate the first metatarsal about its axis (frontal plane axial rotation). The first metatarsal 210 can be properly positioned with respect to the medial cuneiform 222 by moving a bone engagement member of bone positioning guide 20 with respect to a tip of the bone positioning guide. In some embodiments, such movement simultaneously pivots the first metatarsal with respect to the cuneiform and rotates the first metatarsal about its longitudinal axis into an anatomically correct position to correct a transverse plane deformity and a frontal plane deformity. Other instrumented and/or non-instrumented approaches can be used to adjust a position of first metatarsal 210 relative to medial cuneiform 222. Thus, other applications utilizing bi-planar instrument 10 may be performed without utilizing bone positioning guide 20 and/or using a bone positioning guide having a different design than the specific example illustrated herein.


Independent of whether bone positioning guide 20 is used, an example technique may include positioning bone preparation guide 30 over spacer body 12 as shown in FIG. 6 (in instances in which the bone preparation guide is not integral with the spacer body). A portion of spacer body 12 projecting dorsally from the joint space between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222 can be received in opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30. One or more fixation pins can be inserted into apertures of the bone preparation guide 30 to secure the guide to the first metatarsal 210 and the medial cuneiform 222. When bone preparation guide 30 is preassembled with bi-planar instrument 10 (e.g., removable coupled thereto or fixedly and permanently coupled thereto), insertion of bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint spaces can simultaneously position one or more guide surfaces of bone preparation guide 30 over one or more bone surfaces to be prepared (e.g., cut) using the guide surface(s).


In some applications, the end of the first metatarsal 210 facing the medial cuneiform 222 can be prepared with a tissue removing instrument guided by a guide surface of bone preparation guide 30 (e.g., inserted through a slot defined by a first guide surface and a first facing surface). In some embodiments, the first metatarsal 210 end preparation is done after at least partially aligning the bones, e.g., by actuating bone positioning guide 20 or otherwise moving the first metatarsal but after preparing the end of first metatarsal 210. In other embodiments, the first metatarsal 210 end preparation is done before the alignment of the bones.


In addition to preparing the end of first metatarsal 210, the end of the medial cuneiform 222 facing the first metatarsal 210 can be prepared with the tissue removing instrument guided by a guide surface of bone preparation guide 30 (e.g., inserted through a slot defined by a second guide surface and a second facing surface). In some embodiments, the medial cuneiform 222 end preparation is done after the alignment of the bones. In yet other embodiments, the medial cuneiform 222 end preparation is done before the alignment of the bones. In embodiments that include cutting bone or cartilage, the cuneiform cut and the metatarsal cut can be parallel, conforming cuts, or the cuts can be angled relative to each other. In some examples, a saw blade can be inserted through a first slot to cut a portion of the medial cuneiform and the saw blade can be inserted through a second slot to cut a portion of the first metatarsal.


When bone preparation guide 30 is separable from bi-planar instrument 10, any angled/converging pins can be removed and the bone preparation guide 30 can be lifted off substantially parallel first and second pins also inserted into the bones (or all fixation pins can be removed). Bi-planar instrument 10 (or at least spacer body 12 of the instrument) can removed from the foot. In some examples, a compressor-distractor is positioned down over the parallel pins remaining in the bones or otherwise attached to the bones.


In applications where bone positioning guide 20 is utilized, the bone positioning guide may be removed before or after bone preparation guide 30 is removed and, when used, a compressor-distractor is installed. In either case, in some examples, a temporary fixation device such as an olive pin, k-wire, or other fixation structure may be used to maintain the position of the underlying bones (e.g., first metatarsal 210 relative to medial cuneiform 222), e.g., while bone preparation guide 30 is removed and, optionally, a compressor-distractor is installed and/or during permanent fixation.


When a compressor-distractor is pinned to underlying bones (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 222), the compressor-distractor may be actuated to distract the underlying bones. With the underlying bones distracted, the clinician may clean or otherwise prepare the space between the bones and/or the end face of one or both bones. The clinician may clean the space by removing excess cartilage, bone, and/or other cellular debris that may natively exist or may have been created during the bone preparation step that may inhibit infusion.


Independent of whether the clinician utilizes compressor-distractor 100 to distract the underlying bones for cleaning, the clinician can engage the compressor-distractor to compress the first metatarsal toward the medial cuneiform.


With the end faces pressed together (optionally via actuation of a compressor-distractor), the clinician may provisionally and/or permanently fixate the bones or bones portions together. For example, one or more bone fixation devices can be applied across the joint and to the two bones to stabilize the joint for fusion, such as two bone plates positioned in different planes. For example, a first bone plate may be positioned on a dorsal-medial side of the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform and a second bone plate positioned on a medial-plantar side of the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform. In some embodiments, a bone plate used for fixation can be a helical bone plate positioned from a medial side of the cuneiform to a plantar side of the first metatarsal across the joint space. The plates can be applied with the insertion of bone screws. Example bone plates that can be used as first bone plate 310 and/or second bone plate 320 are described in US Patent Publication No. US2016/0192970, titled “Bone Plating System and Method” and filed Jan. 7, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference. Other types in configurations of bone fixation devices can be used, and the disclosure is not limited in this respect. For example, an intramedullary pin or nail may be used in addition to or in lieu of a bone plate.


Spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 of bi-planar instrument 10 may be permanently coupled together (e.g., such that the spacer bodies cannot be separated from each other without permanently destroying or modifying the device). Alternatively, spacer body 12 may be detachably connected to fulcrum body 14. Such a configuration may allow spacer body 12 to be removed from the joint space while leaving fulcrum body 14 in the joint space (or performing other separate actions) or vice versa.


In one implementation, for example, a clinician may insert bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint spaces and then realign one bone relative to another bone. As the bones are realigned relative to each other, fulcrum body 14 may provide a surface along which adjacent bones can slide and/or prevent compression or base shift between adjacent bones during realignment. After realigning the bones relative to each other, the clinician may detach spacer body 12 from fulcrum body 14, leaving spacer body 12 in the joint space. Bone preparation guide 30 can then be installed over spacer body 12 to facilitate preparation of one or both bones.


As another example, the clinician can insert bi-planar instrument 10 into the joint spaces and then insert bone preparation guide 30 over spacer body 12 of the bi-planar instrument 10 (in instances in which the bone preparation guide and instrument are installed separately). The clinician can then use bone preparation guide 30 to prepare the end faces of one or both bones prior to subsequent realignment. With the end faces of one or both bones suitably prepared, the clinician can remove bone preparation guide 30 and detach spacer body 12 from fulcrum body 14. Spacer body 12 can then be removed from the joint space, leaving fulcrum body 14 between adjacent bones for subsequent bone realignment.



FIGS. 7A and 7B are perspective and top views, respectively, of an example configuration of bi-planar instrument 10 in which spacer body 12 is detachable from and attachable to fulcrum body 14. In this example, bridge member 16 is permanently affixed to spacer body 12 and defines an insertion end insertable into a corresponding receiving portion of fulcrum body 14. Spacer body 12 and bridge member 16 can be detached from fulcrum body 14 by sliding the spacer body and bridge member longitudinally (e.g., in a dorsal direction when inserted into the foot), allowing the spacer body and bridge member to be detached from the fulcrum body.


In other configurations, bridge member 16 may be attachable to and detachable from spacer body 12 in addition to or in lieu of being attachable to and detachable from fulcrum body 14. In still other configurations, bi-planar instrument 10 may not include a bridge member but instead may be configured with spacer body 12 connected directly to fulcrum body 14. In these configurations, spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 can have corresponding connections that allow the two bodies to be attachable to and detachable from each other. In general, any features described as being removably coupled to (e.g., attachable to and detachable from) each other can have complementary connection features (e.g., corresponding male and female connection features; corresponding magnetic features) that allow the features to be selectively joined together and separated from each other.


Independent of whether spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 are detachable from each other, bi-planar instrument 10 can join and position the two different bodies relative to each other. The relative angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 can vary depending on the desired application (e.g., the anatomical location where bi-planar instrument 10 is intended to be inserted and/or the anatomy of the specific patient on which bi-planar instrument 10 is used). In some examples, bi-planar instrument 10 defines an interior angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 (with or without bridge member 16) ranging from 60 degrees to 120 degrees, such as from 80 degrees to 100 degrees, or approximately 90 degrees. The angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 may be fixed (such that the angle is not intended to be adjustable or manipulable by a clinician during use) or may be variable (such that the angle can be adjusted by a clinician within a surgical suite prior to insertion and/or while inserted into a patient undergoing a procedure in which the instrument is used).


In some examples, the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 is defined by a sharp transition, e.g., where the spacer body intersects the fulcrum body at the angle defined therebetween. In other examples, bi-planar instrument 10 defines a radius of curvature transitioning between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14, with the angle of intersection defined between the faces of the two bodies. For instance, in the illustrated examples of FIGS. 5B and 7B, bi-planar instrument 10 is illustrated as having a radius of curvature between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14. Configuring bi-planar instrument 10 with a curved transition between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 (at least on a backside of the instrument) may be useful to provide a smooth surface to help insert the instrument into the patient, e.g., by minimizing sharp edges that can catch on the patient's tissue during insertion.


When bi-planar instrument 10 is configured with a fixed angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14, the instrument may be fabricated of a material and have a material thickness effective to substantially inhibit the clinician changing the angle between the two bodies during use of the instrument. Likewise, the instructions for use accompanying bi-planar instrument 10 may indicate that the instrument is intended to be used without manipulating the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14.


In other configurations, the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 may be adjustable by the clinician. For example, the instructions for use accompanying bi-planar instrument 10 may indicate that the clinician is able to adjust the position of spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 relative to each other before and/or after inserting the instrument in the patient. In one example, bi-planar instrument 10 may be fabricated of a material and have a material thickness effective to allow the clinician to change the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 during use. For example, bi-planar instrument 10 (e.g., bridge member 16 of the instrument) may be fabricated of a malleable metal and/or polymeric material that the clinician can manipulate under hand pressure (e.g., with or without the aid of an instrument, such as a bending tool) to change the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14.


Additionally or alternatively, bi-planar instrument 10 may include one or more flexible joints (e.g., rotating joints), which allow the angular position of spacer body 12 to be adjusted relative to fulcrum body 14. As one example, spacer body 12 may be operatively connected to fulcrum body 14 via one or more cables, allowing the angular orientation of spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 to change by bending the one or more cables. As another example, spacer body 12 may be operatively connected to fulcrum body 14 via a hinged connection, allowing the spacer body and fulcrum body to rotate relative to each other about the hinge.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are front and rear perspective views, respectively, of an example configuration of bi-planar instrument 10 in which the instrument is configured with a hinged connection 50 between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14. In the illustrated configuration, spacer body 12 is directedly connected to fulcrum body 14 via hinge 50. In other implementations, spacer body 12 may be hingedly or fixedly connected to bridge member 16 which, in turn is connected to fulcrum body 14 with or without a hinged connection (e.g., a hinged connection or fixed connection). Configurating bi-planar instrument 10 with hinged connection 50 can be beneficial to allow spacer body 12 to rotate relative to fulcrum body 14, allowing the relative angle between the two components to be adjusted.


In use, the clinician can adjust the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 prior to, while, and/or after being inserting into joint spaces of a patient. This can allow the angle between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 to be adjusted based on the needs of the condition being treated and/or specific anatomy of the patient undergoing the procedure. The clinician can rotate spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 relative to each other about hinge 50 prior to and/or after preparing one or both end faces of the bones defining a joint space into which spacer body 12 is to be inserted, as discussed above.


In some configurations, spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 can rotate relative to each other about an unbounded range from rotation (e.g., from a first position in which the inner face of spacer body 12 contacts the inner face of fulcrum body 14 to a second position in which the outer face of the spacer body contacts the outer face of the fulcrum body). In other configurations, spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 can rotate relative to each other within a bounded range of rotation. For example, bi-planar instrument 10 may include one or more rotation stops that limit the extent of rotation between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14.



FIGS. 9A-9D illustrate example relative rotational positions between spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 of bi-planar instrument 10. FIG. 9A illustrates spacer body 12 extending perpendicularly (at a +90 degree angle) relative to fulcrum body 14. FIG. 9B illustrates spacer body 12 positioned at an acute angle with respect to fulcrum body 14. FIG. 9C illustrates spacer body 12 positioned at an obtuse angle relative to fulcrum body 14. Further, FIG. 9D illustrates spacer body 12 extending in an opposite perpendicular direction (at a −90 degree angle) relative to fulcrum body 14.


As shown in FIGS. 9A-9D, spacer body 12 may be configured to rotate through an arc of rotation greater 90 degrees, such as an arc of rotation of at least 180 degrees. For example, spacer body 12 may rotate relative to fulcrum body 14 about axis of rotation defined by hinge 50 from defining an angle of at least +45 degrees with respect to fulcrum body 14 to −45 degrees with respect to the fulcrum body. As a result, the position of spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 may be reversable. This can be useful to allow a single instrument 10 to be used on both the right foot and the left foot of a patient. The position of spacer body 12 can be rotated (e.g., approximately 180 degrees) depending on whether instrument 10 is intended to be used on a right foot or left foot.


As discussed above, bi-planar instrument 10 includes spacer body 12. Spacer body 12 can be sized and shaped to be positioned in a space between two bone portions, such as a joint space between adjacent bones (e.g., a TMT joint between a metatarsal and cuneiform). Spacer body 12 may include a first portion insertable into the space between adjacent bone portions and a second portion that projects above the space between the bone portions. The second portion projecting above the space can be coupled to a surgical instrument, such as a bone preparation guide, to control positioning of the surgical instrument over the bone portions defining the space into which spacer body 12 is inserted.


To engage the surgical instrument (which will subsequently be described with reference to bone preparation guide 30 for purposes of discussion) with spacer body 12, the surgical instrument can have a receiving opening configured to receive the portion of spacer body 12 projecting above the joint space into which the spacer body is inserted. Accordingly, the receiving opening and the spacer body can be sized and shaped relative to each other to allow the spacer body to be inserted into and/or through the receiving opening of the surgical instrument. In some configurations, the receiving opening of the surgical instrument is sized to conform to the size of the spacer body 12 to be inserted therein (e.g., such that there is little or no relative movement between the spacer body and surgical instrument, once the spacer body is inserted into the surgical instrument). In other configurations, the surgical instrument may be sized to allow relative movement between the spacer body and surgical instrument, even once the spacer body is inserted into the receiving opening of the surgical instrument.



FIGS. 10A-10C are illustrations of an example system that includes bi-planar instrument 10 and bone preparation guide 30, where the bone preparation guide is configured to move relative to the spacer body of the bi-planar instrument. FIGS. 10A and 10B are perspective and top views, respectively, showing the spacer body 12 of bi-planar instrument 10 inserted into receiving opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 at a first position. FIG. 10C is a top view showing the spacer body 12 of bi-planar instrument 10 inserted into receiving opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 at a second position, which is moved in the transverse plane relative to the first position.


As shown in the examples of FIGS. 10A-10C, opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 is sized is larger than the portion of spacer body 12 received in the opening in one or more dimensions (e.g., only one). In particular, in the illustrated example, opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 is sized to facilitate linear movement of bone preparation guide 30 relative to spacer body 12 in the transverse plane, e.g., when installed over a TMT joint. Opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 has a region 52 that is longer than a length of spacer body 12 inserted into the opening. As a result, bone preparation guide 30 can slide relative to spacer body 12, while the spacer body projects upward through the opening. This can be useful to allow the clinician to reposition one or more guide surfaces 34, 36 of the bone preparation guide relative to one or more bone ends to be prepared, even once the bone preparation guide is installed on the spacer body inserted into the joint space.



FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate bone preparation guide 30 translated to a lateral-most extent (when positioned on a foot), such that the region 52 of opening 38 that is larger than spacer body 12 is located on the lateral side of the spacer body. FIG. 10C illustrates bone preparation guide 30 translated to a medial-most extent (when positioned on a foot), such that the region 52 of opening 38 that is larger than spacer body 12 is located on the medial side of the spacer body. The clinician can also move bone preparation guide 30 to one or more intermediate positions in the region 52 of opening 38 that is larger than spacer body 12 is split between the medial and lateral sides of spacer body 12.


In some configurations, opening 38 is sized relative to the size of spacer body 12 such that the bone preparation guide can translate a distance of at least 0.5 mm relative to spacer body 12, such as at least 1 mm, at least 2 mm, or at least 5 mm. For example, opening 38 may be sized relative to the portion of spacer body 12 to be received therein to be from 0.5 mm to 25 mm longer than a length of the spacer body, such as from 1 mm to 10 mm longer. This can allow from 0.5 mm to 25 mm of relative movement between the bone preparation guide and spacer body, such as from 1 mm to 10 mm of relative movement. When bone preparation guide 30 is installed over a TMT joint, the bone preparation guide can be moved relative to spacer body 12 in the transverse plane (in a medial to lateral direction) utilizing the extra length of opening 38 relative to the size of the spacer body.


In some examples, opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30 is configured (e.g., sized and/or shaped) relative to spacer body 12 to allow relative movement between the bone preparation guide and spacer body in the frontal plane and/or sagittal plane, in addition to or in lieu of allowing relative movement in the transverse plane. In other examples, spacer body 12 and bone preparation guide 30 are configured to inhibit movement relative to each other in one or more planes. Spacer body 12 and bone preparation guide 30 may be configured to inhibit movement relative to each other in one or more planes by sizing and/or shaping the two features relative to each other to prevent or restrict movement in the one or more planes.


With further reference to FIGS. 8A and 8B, bi-planar instrument 10 is illustrated as including a shelf 54 projecting outwardly from a remainder of spacer body 12. Shelf 54 may be a region of increased thickness relative to the remainder of spacer body 12. Shelf 54 may extend outwardly from a remainder of spacer body 12 from one side of the spacer body (e.g., a front face) or multiple sides of the spacer body (e.g., a front face and a rear face), as illustrated in the examples of FIGS. 8A and 8B. Shelf 54 may be located above the portion of spacer body that is insertable into the joint space between adjacent bones. In other words, shelf 54 may be located on the portion of spacer body 12 that is insertable into opening 38 of bone preparation guide 30. By configuring spacer body 12 with shelf 54, the increased thickness of spacer body 12 in the region of shelf 54 may prevent or eliminate relative movement between the spacer body and bone preparation guide in the frontal and/or sagittal planes (when installed on a foot). As a result, bone preparation guide 30 may translate relative to spacer body 12 in a transverse plane direction but may be in a substantially fixed orientation relative to the spacer body in the frontal and/or sagittal planes.


In the illustrated example of FIGS. 8A and 8B, bi-planar instrument 10 is also illustrated as having a protrusion 56 extending outwardly from one or both faces of spacer body 12. Protrusion 56 can form a bullseye (e.g., an X or T-shaped intersection) when viewing spacer body 12 from above. This can be useful when visualizing spacer body 12 under fluoroscopy to help the clinician interpret where the spacer body is located in the joint space and/or relative to bone preparation guide 30.


While bi-planar instrument 10 has generally been described as being useful for insertion into a space between opposed bone ends transitioning into an intermetatarsal space, the instrument may be used in any desired application and the disclosure is not limited in this respect. For example, bi-planar instrument 10 may be positioned between different bone portions and/or inserted into different joint space(s) than those expressly discussed above. Further, while bi-planar instrument 10 has generally been described with spacer body 12 configured to be positioned in a first joint space and fulcrum body 14 configured to be positioned in second joint space intersecting with and angled relative to the first joint space, the bi-planar instrument can be used with only one of spacer body 12 and fulcrum body 14 positioned in a joint space (and/or positioned between different bone portions).


As one example application, bi-planar instrument 10 may be utilized in a total ankle replacement procedure. One body (e.g., spacer body 12 or fulcrum body 14) can be inserted between the talus and the tibia in the coronal plane and parallel to the frontal plane. The other body can be inserted between the tibia and the talus in the sagittal plane on the medial side or between the fibula and the talus on the lateral side.


As another example application, bi-planar instrument 10 can be utilized in a total knee replacement procedure. One body (e.g., spacer body 12 or fulcrum body 14) can be inserted between the tibia and femur and the other body positioned around either the medial or lateral condyle of the femur or the tibial plateau of the tibia to align a cut guide with the axis of the femur or tibia.


As still a further example application, bi-planar instrument 10 can be utilized in a total elbow replacement procedure. One body (e.g., spacer body 12 or fulcrum body 14) can be inserted between the ulna and humerus for either an ulnar or radial resection. The other body can be positioned around either the medial or lateral side of the bone (ulna or humerus) to set an angle of cut on either bone.


Various examples have been described. These and other examples are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for correcting an alignment of a bone in a foot and preparing bones for fusion, the method comprising: inserting a unitary instrument comprising a spacer body connected to a fulcrum body between bones of a foot by inserting the spacer body into a joint space between a metatarsal and an opposed cuneiform and simultaneously inserting the fulcrum body between the metatarsal and an adjacent metatarsal,preparing an end of the metatarsal using a bone preparation guide aligned with the spacer body to guide a bone preparation instrument;preparing an end of the opposed cuneiform using the bone preparation guide to guide the bone preparation instrument; andmoving the metatarsal relative to the adjacent metatarsal in at least a transverse plane, thereby pivoting the metatarsal about the fulcrum body and reducing an intermetatarsal angle between the metatarsal and the adjacent metatarsal.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the spacer body is connected to the fulcrum body with a bridge member.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein inserting the unitary instrument comprises positioning the bridge member against a proximal-lateral corner of the metatarsal.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the spacer body is fixedly connected to the fulcrum body.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein an angle defined between the spacer body and fulcrum body is within a range from 60 degrees to 120 degrees.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting an angle defined between the spacer body and fulcrum body.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the spacer body is hingedly attached to the fulcrum body, and adjusting the angle defined between the spacer body and fulcrum body comprises rotating the spacer body relative to the fulcrum body about a hinged connection.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein adjusting the angle defined between the spacer body and fulcrum body comprises bending a malleable section of material connecting the spacer body to the fulcrum body.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein inserting the spacer body into the joint space comprises inserting a first portion of the spacer body into the joint space with a second portion of the spacer body extending above the joint space, and further comprising aligning the bone preparation guide with the second portion of the spacer body.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the second portion of the spacer body is sized smaller than a receiving opening of the bone preparation guide into which the second portion of the spacer body is inserted, and further comprising moving the bone preparation guide in at least one plane relative to the spacer body, with the spacer body inserted into the receiving opening.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second portion of the spacer body further comprises a shelf extending outwardly from at least one a front face and a rear face of the spacer body, the shelf restricting movement between the bone preparation guide and the spacer body.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the bone preparation guide is permanently connected to the spacer body, and inserting the spacer body into the joint space comprises positioning the bone preparation guide over the metatarsal and the opposed cuneiform.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising a handle projecting at a non-zero degree angle away from the fulcrum body, wherein inserting the fulcrum body further comprises retracting tissue laterally away from an incision providing access to the metatarsal and the adjacent metatarsal and holding the tissue away from the incision in a tissue retraction space formed between the handle and the fulcrum body.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein: the metatarsal is a first metatarsal,the opposed cuneiform is a medial cuneiform, andthe adjacent metatarsal is a second metatarsal.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising removing at least the spacer body from the joint space, compressing a prepared end of the metatarsal against a prepared end of the opposed cuneiform, and fixating the prepared end of the metatarsal to the prepared end of the opposed cuneiform.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein removing at least the spacer body further comprises removing the fulcrum body connected to the spacer body.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein fixating the prepared end of the metatarsal to the prepared end of the opposed cuneiform comprises inserting a fixation member across a tarsometatarsal joint.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein preparing the end of the metatarsal and preparing the end of the opposing cuneiform comprises preparing one or both of the end of the metatarsal and the end of the opposing cuneiform after moving the metatarsal relative to the adjacent metatarsal.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying at least one fixation device across the joint space between a prepared end of the metatarsal and a prepared end of the opposed cuneiform.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the at least one fixation device comprises a bone plate.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the spacer body and fulcrum body are fabricated as separate components that are subsequently connected together to form the unitary instrument.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/883,649, filed Aug. 7, 2019, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (402)
Number Name Date Kind
3664022 Small May 1972 A
4069824 Weinstock Jan 1978 A
4159716 Borchers Jul 1979 A
4187840 Watanabe Feb 1980 A
4335715 Kirkley Jun 1982 A
4338927 Volkov et al. Jul 1982 A
4349018 Chambers Sep 1982 A
4409973 Neufeld Oct 1983 A
4440168 Warren Apr 1984 A
4501268 Comparetto Feb 1985 A
4502474 Comparetto Mar 1985 A
4509511 Neufeld Apr 1985 A
4565191 Slocum Jan 1986 A
4570624 Wu Feb 1986 A
4627425 Reese Dec 1986 A
4628919 Clyburn Dec 1986 A
4632102 Comparetto Dec 1986 A
4664102 Comparetto May 1987 A
4708133 Comparetto Nov 1987 A
4736737 Fargie et al. Apr 1988 A
4750481 Reese Jun 1988 A
4754746 Cox Jul 1988 A
4757810 Reese Jul 1988 A
4895141 Koeneman et al. Jan 1990 A
4952214 Comparetto Aug 1990 A
4959066 Dunn et al. Sep 1990 A
4978347 Ilizarov Dec 1990 A
4988349 Pennig Jan 1991 A
4995875 Coes Feb 1991 A
5021056 Hofmann et al. Jun 1991 A
5035698 Comparetto Jul 1991 A
5042983 Rayhack Aug 1991 A
5049149 Schmidt Sep 1991 A
5053039 Hofmann et al. Oct 1991 A
5078719 Schreiber Jan 1992 A
5112334 Alchermes et al. May 1992 A
5147364 Comparetto Sep 1992 A
5176685 Rayhack Jan 1993 A
5207676 Canadell et al. May 1993 A
5246444 Schreiber Sep 1993 A
5254119 Schreiber Oct 1993 A
5312412 Whipple May 1994 A
5358504 Paley et al. Oct 1994 A
5364402 Mumme et al. Nov 1994 A
5374271 Hwang Dec 1994 A
5413579 Du Toit May 1995 A
5417694 Marik et al. May 1995 A
5449360 Schreiber Sep 1995 A
5470335 Du Toit Nov 1995 A
5490854 Fisher et al. Feb 1996 A
5529075 Clark Jun 1996 A
5540695 Levy Jul 1996 A
5578038 Slocum Nov 1996 A
5586564 Barrett et al. Dec 1996 A
5601565 Huebner Feb 1997 A
5613969 Jenkins, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5620442 Bailey et al. Apr 1997 A
5620448 Puddu Apr 1997 A
5643270 Combs Jul 1997 A
5667510 Combs Sep 1997 A
H1706 Mason Jan 1998 H
5722978 Jenkins Mar 1998 A
5749875 Puddu May 1998 A
5779709 Harris et al. Jul 1998 A
5788695 Richardson Aug 1998 A
5803924 Oni et al. Sep 1998 A
5810822 Mortier Sep 1998 A
5843085 Graser Dec 1998 A
5893553 Pinkous Apr 1999 A
5911724 Wehrli Jun 1999 A
5935128 Carter et al. Aug 1999 A
5941877 Viegas et al. Aug 1999 A
5951556 Faccioli et al. Sep 1999 A
5980526 Johnson et al. Nov 1999 A
5984931 Greenfield Nov 1999 A
6007535 Rayhack et al. Dec 1999 A
6027504 McGuire Feb 2000 A
6030391 Brainard et al. Feb 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6171309 Huebner Jan 2001 B1
6203545 Stoffella Mar 2001 B1
6248109 Stoffella Jun 2001 B1
6391031 Toomey May 2002 B1
6416465 Brau Jul 2002 B2
6478799 Williamson Nov 2002 B1
6511481 von Hoffmann et al. Jan 2003 B2
6547793 McGuire Apr 2003 B1
6676662 Bagga et al. Jan 2004 B1
6719773 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743233 Baldwin et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755838 Trnka Jun 2004 B2
6796986 Duffner Sep 2004 B2
6859661 Tuke Feb 2005 B2
7018383 McGuire Mar 2006 B2
7033361 Collazo Apr 2006 B2
7097647 Segler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7112204 Justin et al. Sep 2006 B2
7153310 Ralph et al. Dec 2006 B2
7182766 Mogul Feb 2007 B1
7241298 Nemec et al. Jul 2007 B2
7282054 Steffensmeier et al. Oct 2007 B2
7377924 Raistrick et al. May 2008 B2
7465303 Riccione et al. Dec 2008 B2
7540874 Trumble et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572258 Stiernborg Aug 2009 B2
7641660 Lakin et al. Jan 2010 B2
D610257 Horton Feb 2010 S
7686811 Byrd et al. Mar 2010 B2
7691108 Lavallee Apr 2010 B2
7763026 Egger et al. Jul 2010 B2
D629900 Fisher Dec 2010 S
7967823 Ammann et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972338 O'Brien Jul 2011 B2
D646389 Claypool et al. Oct 2011 S
8057478 Kuczynski et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062301 Ammann et al. Nov 2011 B2
D651315 Bertoni et al. Dec 2011 S
D651316 May et al. Dec 2011 S
8080010 Schulz et al. Dec 2011 B2
8083746 Novak Dec 2011 B2
8123753 Poncet Feb 2012 B2
8137406 Novak et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147530 Strnad et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167918 Strnad et al. May 2012 B2
8172848 Tomko et al. May 2012 B2
8192441 Collazo Jun 2012 B2
8197487 Poncet et al. Jun 2012 B2
8231623 Jordan Jul 2012 B1
8231663 Kay et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236000 Ammann et al. Aug 2012 B2
8246561 Agee et al. Aug 2012 B1
D666721 Wright et al. Sep 2012 S
8262664 Justin et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277459 Sand et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282644 Edwards Oct 2012 B2
8282645 Lawrence et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292966 Morton Oct 2012 B2
8303596 Plassky et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313492 Wong et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323289 Re Dec 2012 B2
8337503 Lian Dec 2012 B2
8343159 Bennett Jan 2013 B2
8377105 Buescher Feb 2013 B2
D679395 Wright et al. Apr 2013 S
8409209 Ammann et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435246 Fisher et al. May 2013 B2
8475462 Thomas et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518045 Szanto Aug 2013 B2
8523870 Green, II et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529571 Horan et al. Sep 2013 B2
8540777 Ammann et al. Sep 2013 B2
8545508 Collazo Oct 2013 B2
D694884 Mooradian et al. Dec 2013 S
D695402 Dacosta et al. Dec 2013 S
8652142 Geissler Feb 2014 B2
8657820 Kubiak et al. Feb 2014 B2
D701303 Cook Mar 2014 S
8672945 Lavallee et al. Mar 2014 B2
8696716 Kartalian et al. Apr 2014 B2
8702715 Ammann et al. Apr 2014 B2
D705929 Frey May 2014 S
8715363 Ratron et al. May 2014 B2
8728084 Berelsman et al. May 2014 B2
8758354 Habegger et al. Jun 2014 B2
8764760 Metzger et al. Jul 2014 B2
8764763 Wong et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771279 Philippon et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777948 Bernsteiner Jul 2014 B2
8784427 Fallin et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784457 Graham Jul 2014 B2
8795286 Sand et al. Aug 2014 B2
8801727 Chan et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808303 Stemniski et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828012 May et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858602 Weiner et al. Oct 2014 B2
8882778 Ranft Nov 2014 B2
8882816 Kartalian et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888785 Ammann et al. Nov 2014 B2
D720456 Dacosta et al. Dec 2014 S
8900247 Tseng et al. Dec 2014 B2
8906026 Ammann et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945132 Plassy et al. Feb 2015 B2
8998903 Price et al. Apr 2015 B2
8998904 Zeetser et al. Apr 2015 B2
9023052 Lietz et al. May 2015 B2
9044250 Olsen et al. Jun 2015 B2
9060822 Lewis et al. Jun 2015 B2
9089376 Medoff et al. Jul 2015 B2
9101421 Blacklidge Aug 2015 B2
9107715 Blitz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9113920 Ammann et al. Aug 2015 B2
D740424 Dacosta et al. Oct 2015 S
D765844 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766434 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766437 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766438 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766439 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
9452057 DaCosta et al. Sep 2016 B2
9522023 Haddad et al. Nov 2016 B2
9592084 Grant Mar 2017 B2
9750538 Soffiatti et al. Sep 2017 B2
9785747 Geebelen Oct 2017 B2
9980760 DaCosta et al. May 2018 B2
10028750 Rose Jul 2018 B2
10064631 Dacosta et al. Sep 2018 B2
10159499 Dacosta et al. Dec 2018 B2
10292713 Fallin et al. May 2019 B2
10327829 Dacosta et al. Jun 2019 B2
10376268 Fallin et al. Aug 2019 B2
10470779 Fallin et al. Nov 2019 B2
10856886 Dacosta et al. Dec 2020 B2
10856918 Dacosta Dec 2020 B2
10939939 Gil et al. Mar 2021 B1
11304705 Fallin et al. Apr 2022 B2
20020099381 Maroney Jul 2002 A1
20020107519 Dixon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165552 Duffner Nov 2002 A1
20020198531 Millard et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040010259 Keller et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039394 Conti et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040097946 Dietzel et al. May 2004 A1
20040138669 Horn Jul 2004 A1
20050004676 Schon et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050059978 Sherry et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070909 Egger et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075641 Singhatat et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101961 Huebner et al. May 2005 A1
20050149042 Metzger Jul 2005 A1
20050228389 Stiernborg Oct 2005 A1
20050251147 Novak Nov 2005 A1
20050267482 Hyde, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
20050273112 McNamara Dec 2005 A1
20060129163 McGuire Jun 2006 A1
20060206044 Simon Sep 2006 A1
20060217733 Plassky et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229621 Cadmus Oct 2006 A1
20060241607 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241608 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264961 Murray-Brown Nov 2006 A1
20070010818 Stone et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070123857 Deffenbaugh et al. May 2007 A1
20070233138 Figueroa et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265634 Weinstein Nov 2007 A1
20070276383 Rayhack Nov 2007 A1
20080009863 Bond et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015603 Collazo Jan 2008 A1
20080039850 Rowley et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080091197 Coughlin Apr 2008 A1
20080140081 Heavener et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147073 Ammann et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172054 Claypool et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195215 Morton Aug 2008 A1
20080208252 Holmes Aug 2008 A1
20080262500 Collazo Oct 2008 A1
20080269908 Warburton Oct 2008 A1
20080288004 Schendel Nov 2008 A1
20090036893 Kartalian et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036931 Pech et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054899 Ammann et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090093849 Grabowski Apr 2009 A1
20090105767 Reiley Apr 2009 A1
20090118733 Orsak et al. May 2009 A1
20090198244 Leibel Aug 2009 A1
20090198279 Zhang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216089 Davidson Aug 2009 A1
20090222047 Graham Sep 2009 A1
20090254092 Albiol Llorach Oct 2009 A1
20090254126 Orbay et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287309 Walch et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100069910 Hasselman Mar 2010 A1
20100121334 Couture et al. May 2010 A1
20100130981 Richards May 2010 A1
20100152782 Stone et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168799 Schumer Jul 2010 A1
20100185245 Paul et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249779 Hotchkiss et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256687 Neufeld et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318088 Warne et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324556 Tyber et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009865 Orfaly Jan 2011 A1
20110093084 Morton Apr 2011 A1
20110118739 Tyber et al. May 2011 A1
20110178524 Lawrence et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110245835 Dodds et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110288550 Orbay et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301648 Lofthouse et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016426 Robinson Jan 2012 A1
20120065689 Prasad et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078258 Lo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120123420 Honiball May 2012 A1
20120123484 Lietz et al. May 2012 A1
20120130376 Loring et al. May 2012 A1
20120130382 Iannotti et al. May 2012 A1
20120130383 Budoff May 2012 A1
20120184961 Johannaber Jul 2012 A1
20120185056 Warburton Jul 2012 A1
20120191199 Raemisch Jul 2012 A1
20120239045 Li Sep 2012 A1
20120253350 Anthony et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265301 Demers et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120277745 Lizee Nov 2012 A1
20120303033 Weiner et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330135 Millahn et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130012949 Fallin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130035694 Grimm et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130085499 Lian Apr 2013 A1
20130096563 Meade et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130131821 Cachia May 2013 A1
20130150900 Haddad et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150903 Vincent Jun 2013 A1
20130158556 Jones et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165936 Myers Jun 2013 A1
20130165938 Chow et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130172942 Lewis et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184714 Kaneyama et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190765 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190766 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130204259 Zajac Aug 2013 A1
20130226248 Hatch et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226252 Mayer Aug 2013 A1
20130231668 Olsen et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130237987 Graham Sep 2013 A1
20130237989 Bonutti Sep 2013 A1
20130267956 Terrill et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310836 Raub et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325019 Thomas et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325076 Palmer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130331845 Horan et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338785 Wong Dec 2013 A1
20140005672 Edwards et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025127 Richter Jan 2014 A1
20140039501 Schickendantz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140039561 Weiner et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046387 Waizenegger Feb 2014 A1
20140074099 Vigneron et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140074101 Collazo Mar 2014 A1
20140094861 Fallin Apr 2014 A1
20140094924 Hacking et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140135775 Maxson et al. May 2014 A1
20140163563 Reynolds et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171953 Gonzalvez et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180342 Lowery et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188139 Fallin et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140194884 Martin et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140194999 Orbay et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207144 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140249537 Wong et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257308 Johannaber Sep 2014 A1
20140257509 Dacosta et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276815 Riccione Sep 2014 A1
20140276853 Long et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277176 Buchanan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277214 Helenbolt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288562 Von Zabern et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296995 Reiley et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303621 Gerold et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140336658 Luna et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343555 Russi et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350561 DaCosta et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150032168 Orsak et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150045801 Axelson, Jr. et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150045839 Dacosta et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051650 Verstreken et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057667 Ammann et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066094 Prandi et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150112446 Melamed et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119944 Geldwert Apr 2015 A1
20150142064 Perez et al. May 2015 A1
20150150608 Sammarco Jun 2015 A1
20150182273 Stemniski et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223851 Hill et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150245858 Weiner et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160015426 Dayton Jan 2016 A1
20160022315 Soffiatti et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160135858 DaCosta et al. May 2016 A1
20160151165 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160175089 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160192950 Dayton et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160192970 Dayton et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160199076 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213384 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160235414 Hatch et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160242791 Fallin et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256204 Patel et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160324532 Montoya et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160354127 Lundquist et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170014143 Dayton et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170014173 Smith et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170042598 Santrock et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042599 Bays et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170079669 Bays et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170143511 Cachia May 2017 A1
20170164989 Weiner et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170172638 Santrock Jun 2017 A1
20180132868 Dacosta et al. May 2018 A1
20180289379 Dacosta et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180344334 Kim et al. Dec 2018 A1
20200015874 Hartson et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200229828 Wagner et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200237387 Luttrell et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200330109 Woodard et al. Oct 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (101)
Number Date Country
2009227957 Jul 2014 AU
2491824 Sep 2005 CA
2854997 May 2013 CA
695846 Sep 2006 CH
2930668 Aug 2007 CN
201558162 Aug 2010 CN
201572172 Sep 2010 CN
201586060 Sep 2010 CN
201912210 Aug 2011 CN
101237835 Nov 2012 CN
202801773 Mar 2013 CN
103462675 Dec 2013 CN
103505276 Jan 2014 CN
203458450 Mar 2014 CN
103735306 Apr 2014 CN
102860860 May 2014 CN
203576647 May 2014 CN
104490460 Apr 2015 CN
104510523 Apr 2015 CN
104523327 Apr 2015 CN
104546102 Apr 2015 CN
204379413 Jun 2015 CN
204410951 Jun 2015 CN
204428143 Jul 2015 CN
204428144 Jul 2015 CN
204428145 Jul 2015 CN
204446081 Jul 2015 CN
202006010241 Mar 2007 DE
102007053058 Apr 2009 DE
685206 Sep 2000 EP
1508316 May 2007 EP
1897509 Jul 2009 EP
2124772 Dec 2009 EP
2124832 Aug 2012 EP
2632349 Sep 2013 EP
2665428 Nov 2013 EP
2742878 Jun 2014 EP
2750617 Jul 2014 EP
2849684 Mar 2015 EP
2624764 Dec 2015 EP
3023068 May 2016 EP
2362616 Mar 1978 FR
2764183 Nov 1999 FR
2953120 Jan 2012 FR
3030221 Jun 2016 FR
2154143 Sep 1985 GB
2154144 Sep 1985 GB
2334214 Jan 2003 GB
200903719 Jun 2009 IN
200904479 May 2010 IN
140DELNP2012 Feb 2013 IN
2004KOLNP2013 Nov 2013 IN
S635739 Jan 1988 JP
H0531116 Feb 1993 JP
2004174265 Jun 2004 JP
2006158972 Jun 2006 JP
4134243 Aug 2008 JP
2008537498 Sep 2008 JP
4162380 Oct 2008 JP
2011092405 May 2011 JP
2011523889 Aug 2011 JP
4796943 Oct 2011 JP
5466647 Apr 2014 JP
2014511207 May 2014 JP
2014521384 Aug 2014 JP
5628875 Nov 2014 JP
100904142 Jun 2009 KR
756 Nov 2014 MD
2098036 Dec 1997 RU
2195892 Jan 2003 RU
2320287 Mar 2008 RU
2321366 Apr 2008 RU
2321369 Apr 2008 RU
2346663 Feb 2009 RU
2412662 Feb 2011 RU
1333328 Aug 1987 SU
0166022 Sep 2001 WO
03075775 Sep 2003 WO
2004089227 Oct 2004 WO
2008051064 May 2008 WO
2009029798 Mar 2009 WO
2009032101 Mar 2009 WO
2011037885 Mar 2011 WO
2012029008 Mar 2012 WO
2013090392 Jun 2013 WO
2013134387 Sep 2013 WO
2013169475 Nov 2013 WO
2014020561 Feb 2014 WO
2014022055 Feb 2014 WO
2014035991 Mar 2014 WO
2014085882 Jun 2014 WO
2014147099 Sep 2014 WO
2014152219 Sep 2014 WO
2014152535 Sep 2014 WO
2014177783 Nov 2014 WO
2014200017 Dec 2014 WO
2015094409 Jun 2015 WO
2015105880 Jul 2015 WO
2015127515 Sep 2015 WO
2016134160 Aug 2016 WO
2020180598 Sep 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (189)
Entry
“Accu-Cut Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Brochure, Oct. 2018, 2 pages.
“Acumed Osteotomiesystem Operationstechnik,” Acumed, 2014, 19 pages (including 3 pages English translation).
Albano et al., “Biomechanical Study of Transcortical or Transtrabecular Bone Fixation of Patellar Tendon Graft wih Bioabsorbable Pins in ACL Reconstruction in Sheep,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Rev Bras Ortop.) vol. 47, No. 1, 2012, pp. 43-49.
Alvine et al., “Peg and Dowel Fusion of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint,” Foot & Ankle, vol. 1, No. 2, 1980, pp. 90-94.
Anderson et al., “Uncemented STAR Total Ankle Prostheses,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86(1, Suppl 2), Sep. 2004, pp. 103-111, (Abstract Only).
Bednarz et al., “Modified Lapidus Procedure for the Treatment of Hypermobile Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 21, No. 10, Oct. 2000, pp. 816-821.
Blomer, “Knieendoprothetik—Herstellerische Probleme und technologische Entwicklungen,” Orthopade, vol. 29, 2000, pp. 688-696, including English Abstract on p. 689.
Bouaicha et al., “Fixation of Maximal Shift Scarf Osteotomy with Inside-Out Plating: Technique Tip,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 32, No. 5, May 2011, pp. 567-569.
Carr et al., “Correctional Osteotomy for Metatarsus Primus Varus and Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 50-A, No. 7, Oct. 1968, pp. 1353-1367.
Coetzee et al., “The Lapidus Procedure: A Prospective Cohort Outcome Study,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 526-531.
Dayton et al., “Is Our Current Paradigm for Evaluation and Management of the Bunion Deformity Flawed? A Discussion of Procedure Philosophy Relative to Anatomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, 2015, pp. 102-111.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 584-587.
Dayton et al., “Relationship Of Frontal Plane Rotation Of First Metatarsal To Proximal Articular Set Angle And Hallux Alignment In Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis For Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series And Critical Review Of The Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, No. 3, May/Jun. 2013, pp. 348-354.
Dayton et al., “Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Frontal Rotation Required to Anatomically Align the First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint During Modified Tarsal-Metatarsal Arthrodesis Without Capsular Balancing,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2015, pp. 1-6.
De Geer et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, Mar. 26, 2015, 9 pages.
DiDomenico et al., “Correction of Frontal Plane Rotation of Sesamoid Apparatus during the Lapidus Procedure: A Novel Approach,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 248-251.
Dobbe et al. “Patient-Tailored Plate For Bone Fixation And Accurate 3D Positioning In Corrective Osteotomy,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 51, No. 1-2, Feb. 2013, pp. 19-27, (Abstract Only).
Doty et al., “Hallux valgus and hypermobility of the first ray: facts and fiction,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1655-1660.
EBI Extra Small Rail Fixator, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-ebi-extra-small-rail-fixator>, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Comparison of the Mechanical Characteristics of a Universal Small Biplane Plating Technique Without Compression Screw and Single Anatomic Plate With Compression Screw,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 55, No. 3, May/Jun. 2016, published online: Feb. 9, 2016, pp. 567-571.
“Futura Forefoot Implant Arthroplasty Products,” Tornier, Inc., 2008, 14 pages.
Galli et al., “Enhanced Lapidus Arthrodesis: Crossed Screw Technique With Middle Cuneiform Fixation Further Reduces Sagittal Mobility,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, vol. 3, May/Jun. 2015, published online Nov. 21, 2014, pp. 437-440.
Garthwait, “Accu-Cut System Facilitates Enhanced Precision,” Podiatry Today, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 6 pages.
Gonzalez Del Pino et al., “Variable Angle Locking Intercarpal Fusion System for Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2012, pp. 73-78.
Gotte, “Entwicklung eines Assistenzrobotersystems für die Knieendoprothetik,” Forschungsberichte, Technische Universitat Munchen, 165, 2002, 11 pages, including partial English Translation.
Gregg et al., “Plantar plate repair and Weil osteotomy for metatarsophalangeal joint instability,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, 2007, pp. 116-121.
Grondal et al., “A Guide Plate for Accurate Positioning of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint during Fusion,” Operative Orthopädie Und Traumatologie, vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 167-178 (Abstract Only).
“HAT-TRICK Lesser Toe Repair System,” Smith & Nephew, Brochure, Aug. 2014, 12 pages.
“HAT-TRICK Lesser Toe Repair System, Foot and Ankle Technique Guide, Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, 2014, 16 pages.
Hetherington et al., “Evaluation of surgical experience and the use of an osteotomy guide on the apical angle of an Austin osteotomy,” The Foot, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 159-164.
Hirao et al., “Computer assisted planning and custom-made surgical guide for malunited pronation deformity after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis: A case report,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 19, Nos. 1-3, 2014, pp. 13-19.
“Hoffmann II Compact External Fixation System,” Stryker, Brochure, Literature No. 5075-1-500, 2006, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann II Micro Lengthener,” Stryker, Operative Technique, Literature No. 5075-2-002, 2008, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann Small System External Fixator Orthopedic Instruments,” Stryker, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Stryker-Hoffmann-Small-System-External-Fixator_1438850129.html>, 3 pages.
Mortier et al., “Axial Rotation of the First Metatarsal Head in a Normal Population and Hallux Valgus Patients,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, vol. 98, 2012, pp. 677-683.
Kim et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 8, 2015, pp. 944-952.
“Lag Screw Target Bow,” Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG, Germany 2004, 8 pages.
Lapidus, “The Author's Bunion Operation From 1931 to 1959,” Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 16, 1960, pp. 119-135.
Lieske et al., “Implantation einer Sprunggelenktotalendo-prothese vom Typ Salto 2,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 4, 2014, pp. 401-413, including English Abstract on p. 403.
MAC (Multi Axial Correction) Fixation System, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-mac-multi-axial-correction-fixation-system>, 7 pages.
Magin, “Computernavigierter Gelenkersatz am Knie mit dem Orthopilot,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 63-80, including English Abstract on p. 64.
Magin, “Die belastungsstabile Lapidus-Arthrodese bei Hallux-valgus-Deformität mittels IVP-Plattenfixateur (V-TEK-System),” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 2, 2014, pp. 184-195, including English Abstract on p. 186.
Michelangelo Bunion System, Surgical Technique, Instratek Incorporated, publication date unknown, 4 pages.
Mini Joint Distractor, Arthrex, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.arthrex.com/foot-ankle/mini-joint-distractor/products>, 2 pages.
MiniRail System, Small Bone Innovations, Surgical Technique, 2010, 24 pages.
Miyake et al., “Three-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Using Custom-Made Surgical Guides Based on Computer Simulation,” JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques, vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, 11 pages.
Modular Rail System: External Fixator, Smith & Nephew, Surgical Technique, 2013, 44 pages.
Monnich et al., “A Hand Guided Robotic Planning System for Laser Osteotomy in Surgery,” World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering vol. 25/6: Surgery, Nimimal Invasive Interventions, Endoscopy and Image Guided Therapy, Sep. 7-12, 2009, pp. 59-62, (Abstract Only).
Moore et al., “Effect Of Ankle Flexion Angle On Axial Alignment Of Total Ankle Replacement,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 1093-1098, (Abstract Only).
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/045393, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 20, 2020, 10 pages.
Nagy et al., “The AO Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy System Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 91-97.
NexFix from Nexa Orthopedics, MetaFix I from Merete Medical, Inc. and The BioPro Lower Extremities from BioPro, found in Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, 4 pages.
Odenbring et al., “A guide instrument for high tibial osteotomy,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 60, No. 4, 1989, pp. 449-451.
Okuda et al., “Postoperative Incomplete Reduction of the Sesamoids as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-A, No. 1, Jul. 2009, pp. 1637-1645.
Osher et al., “Accurate Determination of Relative Metatarsal Protrusion with a Small Intermetatarsal Angle: A Novel Simplified Method,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2014, published online Jun. 3, 2014, pp. 548-556.
Otsuki et al., “Developing a novel custom cutting guide for curved per-acetabular osteotomy,” International Orthopaedics (SICOT), vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1033-1038.
Patel et al., “Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis: Rate of Nonunion in 227 Cases,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2004, pp. 37-42.
“Patient to Patient Precision, Accu-Cut, Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 23, No. 8, Aug. 2002, 2 pages.
Peters et al., “Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Laceration as a Complication of Total Ankle Arthroplasty,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, pp. 148-149.
“Prophecy Inbone Preoperative Navigation Guides,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Nov. 2013, 6 pages.
“Rayhack Ulnar Shortening Generation II Low-Profile Locking System Surgical Technique,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Dec. 2013, 20 pages.
Rx-Fix Mini Rail External Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Brochure, Aug. 15, 2014, 2 pages.
Saltzman et al., “Prospective Controlled Trial of STAR Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Fusion: Initial Results,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 30, No. 7, Jul. 2009, pp. 579-596.
Scanlan et al. “Technique Tip: Subtalar Joint Fusion Using a Parallel Guide and Double Screw Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2010, pp. 305-309, (Abstract Only).
Scranton Jr. et al., “Anatomic Variations in the First Ray: Part I. Anatomic Aspects Related to Bunion Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 151, Sep. 1980, pp. 244-255.
Siddiqui et al. “Fixation Of Metatarsal Fracture With Bone Plate In A Dromedary Heifer,” Open Veterinary Journal, vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp. 17-20.
Sidekick Stealth Rearfoot Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Surgical Technique, Dec. 2, 2013, 20 pages.
Simpson et al., “Computer-Assisted Distraction Ostegogenesis By Ilizarov's Method,” International Journal of Medical Robots and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 310-320, (Abstract Only).
Small Bone External Fixation System, Acumed, Surgical Technique, Effective date Sep. 2014, 8 pages.
“Smith & Nephew scores a HAT-TRICK with its entry into the high-growth hammer toe repair market,” Smith & Nephew, Jul. 31, 2014, 2 pages.
Stableloc External Fixation System, Acumed, Product Overview, Effective date Sep. 2015, 4 pages.
Stahl et al., “Derotation Of Post-Traumatic Femoral Deformities By Closed Intramedullary Sawing,” Injury, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 145-151, (Abstract Only).
Talbot et al., “Assessing Sesamoid Subluxation: How Good is the AP Radiograph?,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 547-554.
TempFix Spanning the Ankle Joint Half Pin and Transfixing Pin Techniques, Biomet Orthopedics, Surgical Technique, 2012, 16 pages.
Toth et al., “The Effect of First Ray Shortening in the Development of Metatarsalgia in the Second Through Fourth Rays After Metatarsal Osteotomy,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 61-63.
Tricot et al., “3D-corrective osteotomy using surgical guides for posttraumatic distal humeral deformity,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, vol. 78, No. 4, 2012, pp. 538-542.
Vitek et al., “Die Behandlung des Hallux rigidus mit Cheilektomie und Akin-Moberg-Osteotomie unter Verwendung einer neuen Schnittlehre und eines neuen Schraubensystems,” Orthopadische Praxis, vol. 44, Nov. 2008, pp. 563-566, including English Abstract on p. 564.
Vitek, “Neue Techniken in der Fußchirurgie Das V-tek-System,” ABW Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, 2009, 11 pages, including English Abstract.
Weber et al., “A Simple System For Navigation Of Bone Alignment Osteotomies Of The Tibia,” International Congress Series, vol. 1268, Jan. 2004, pp. 608-613, (Abstract Only).
Weil et al., “Anatomic Plantar Plate Repair Using the Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy Approach,” Foot & Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, pp. 145-150.
Wendl et al., “Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik,” OP-Journal, vol. 17, 2002, pp. 22-27, including English Abstract.
Whipple et al., “Zimmer Herbert Whipple Bone Screw System: Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Scaphoid and Other Small Bone Fractures,” Zimmer, 2003, 59 pages.
Yakacki et al. “Compression Forces of Internal and External Ankle Fixation Devices with Simulated Bone Resorption,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 76-85, (Abstract Only).
Yasuda et al., “Proximal Supination Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 6, Jun. 2015, pp. 696-704.
Boffeli et al., “Can We Abandon Saw Wedge Resection in Lapidus Fusion? A Comparative Study of Joint Preparation Techniques Regarding Correction of Deformity, Union Rate, and Preservation of First Ray Length,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 58, No. 6, Nov. 2019, published online: Sep. 25, 2019, pp. 1118-1124.
Conti et al., “Effect of the Modified Lapidus Procedure on Pronation of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, Feb. 1, 2020, published online: Oct. 16, 2019, 8 pages.
Conti et al., “Effect of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus on Foot Width,” Foot & Ankle International, Feb. 1, 2020, published online: Oct. 30, 2019, 6 pages.
Cruz et al., “Does Hallux Valgus Exhibit a Deformity Inherent to the First Metatarsal Bone?” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 58, No. 6, Nov. 2019, pp. 1210-1214.
Dahlgren et al., “First Tarsometatarsal Fusion Using Saw Preparation vs. Standard Preparation of the Joint: A Cadaver Study,” Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, vol. 4, No. 4, Oct. 2019, 2 pages.
Hatch et al., “Triplane Hallux Abducto Valgus Classification,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 57, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2018, published online: May 18, 2018, pp. 972-981.
Langan et al., “Maintenance of Correction of the Modified Lapidus Procedure With a First Metatarsal to Intermediate Cuneiform Cross-Screw Technique,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2020, published online Dec. 26, 2019, pp. 426-436.
Li et al., “Evolution of Thinking of the Lapidus Procedure and Fixation,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 25, No. 1, Mar. 2020, published online: Dec. 16, 2019, pp. 18 pages.
Lopez et al., “Metatarsalgia: Assessment Algorithm and Decision Making,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 2019, published online: Sep. 25, 2019, pp. 561-569.
Ray et al., “Multicenter Early Radiographic Outcomes of Triplanar Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis With Early Weightbearing,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 40, No. 8, Aug. 1, 2019, published online: May 5, 2019, 7 pages.
Walker et al., “The Role of First Ray Insufficiency in the Development of Metatarsalgia,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 2019, published online: Sep. 5, 2019, pp. 641-648.
Claim Chart for Groves Public use (Mar. 26, 2014), Exhibit B4 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 161 pages.
Groves, “Operative Report,” St. Tammany Parish Hospital, Date of Procedure, Mar. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
D'Amico et al., “Motion of the First Ray: Clarification Through Investigation,” Journal of the American Podiatry Association, vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 1979, pp. 17-23.
Okuda et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Ostetomy for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of Outcome for Moderate and Server Deformities,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 29, No. 7, Jul. 2008, pp. 664-670.
Okuda et al., “The Shape of the Lateral Edge of the First Metatarsal Head as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, 2007, pp. 2163-2172.
Mizuno et al., “Detorsion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Bone in Hallux Valgus,” Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Tokyo, 1956; 30:813-819.
Eustace et al., “Hallux valgus, first metarsal pronation and collapse of the medical longitudinal arch—a radiological correlation,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 23, 1994, pp. 191-194.
Collan et al., “The biomechanics of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus: A preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 19, 2013, pp. 155-161.
Le et al., “Tarsometatrsal Arthrodesis,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section II, Chapter 40, 2011, pp. 281-285.
Coetzee et al., “Revision Hallux Valgus Correction,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 15, 2011, pp. 84-96.
“Foot and Ankle Instrument Set,” Smith & Nephew, 2013, 2 pages.
“Lapidus Pearls: Gaining Joint Exposure to Decrease Non-Union,” Youtube, Retrieved online from <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqJyE7pj-Y>, dated Nov. 2, 2009, 3 pages.
“Reconstructive Surgery of the Foot & Ankle,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Conference Program, May 2015, 28 pages.
“Speed Continuous Active Compressino Implant,” BioMedical Enterprises, Inc., A120-029 Rev. 3, 2013, 4 pages.
“Visionaire: Patient Matched Cutting Blocks Surgical Procedure,” Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2009, 2 pages.
Arthrex, “Comprehensive Foot System,” Retrieved online from <https://www.arthrex.com/resources/animation/8U3iaPvY6kO8bwFAwZF50Q/comprehensive-foot-system?referringTeam=foot_and_ankle>, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 3 pages.
Baravarian, “Why the Lapidus Procedure is Ideal for Bunions,” Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearthmpgloballe.com/site/podipodi/article/5542>, dated May 2006, 8 pages.
Bauer et al., “Offset-V Ostetomy of the First Metatarsal Shaft in Hallux Abducto Valgus,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 29, 2013, 26 pages.
Cottom, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 517-522.
Coughlin, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 7, 1999, pp. 133-143.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plante Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 274-278.
Dayton et al., “Relationship of Frontal Plante Rotation of First Metatarsal to Proximal Articular Set Angle and Hallux Alignment in Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2013, Artical in Press, Mar. 1, 2013, 7 pages.
DiDomenico et al., “Lapidus Bunionectomy: First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 31, 2013, 24 pages.
Fallin et al., U.S. Provisional Application entitled Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 62/118,378, filed Feb. 19, 2015, 62 pages.
Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide To The Lapidus Bunionectomy,”Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/blogged/straightforward-guide-lapidus-bunionectomy>, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 5 pages.
Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2014, Chapter 14, 2014, pp. 91-93.
Fleming et al., “Results of Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Procedure Using Medial Eminence as an Interpositional Autograft,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 272-275.
Fuhrmann, “Arthrodesis of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint for Correction of the Advanced Splayfoot Accompanied by a Hallux Valgus,” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, No. 2, 2005, pp. 195-210.
Gerard et al., “The Modified Lapidus Procedure,” Orthpedics, vol. 31, No. 3, Mar. 2008, 7 pages.
Giannoudis et al., “Hallux Valgus Correction,” Practical Procedures in Elective Orthpaedic Surgery, Pelvis and Lower Extremity, Chapter 38, 2012, 22 pages.
Greiner, “The Jargon of Pedal Movements,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 109-125.
Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Chapter 6, 2015, pp. 23-29.
Hardy et al., “Observations on Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 33B, No. 3, Aug. 1951, pp. 376-391.
Holmes, Jr., “Correction of the Intermetatarsal Angle Component of Hallux Valgus Using Fiberwire-Attached Endo-buttons,” Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podologicas, vol. 6, No. 2, 2012, pp. 73-79.
Integra, “Integra Large Qwix Positioning and Fixation Screw, Surgical Technique,” 2012, 16 pages.
Kilmartin et al., “Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a paitent focused 9 year follow up of 50 patients,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, 12 pages.
Lee et al., “Technique Tip: Lateral Soft-Tissue Release for Correction of Hallux Valgus Through a Medial Incision Using A Dorsal Flap Over the First Metatarsal,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 2007, pp. 949-951.
Mote et al., “First Metarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” JFAS Techniques Guide, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 593-601.
Myerson, “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis,” The Foot and Ankle, Chapter 9, 1997, pp. 107-117.
Sammarco, “Surgical Strategies: Mau Ostetomy for Correction of Moderate and Sever Hallux Valgus Deformity,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 2007, pp. 857-864.
Schon et al., “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus,”The Foot and Ankle, Second Edition, Chapter 8, 2002, pp. 99-117.
Sokoloff, “Lapidus Procedure,” Textbook of Bunion Surgery Chapter 15, 1981, pp. 277-287.
Stamatis et al., “Mini Locking Plate as “Medial Buttress” for Oblique Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 920-922.
Stewart, “Use for BME Speed Nitinol Staple Fixation for the Lapidus Procedure,” date unknown, 1 page.
Wukich et al., “Hypermobility of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 10, No. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 157-166.
Dayton et al., “Biwinged Excision for Round Pedal Lesions,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 35, No. 3, 1996, pp. 244-249.
Dayton et al., “Medial Incision Approach to the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 40, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 414-417.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Moderate and Severe Metatrarsus Primus Adductus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2002, pp. 316-319.
Dayton et al., “Use of the Z Osteotomy for Tailor Bunionectomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 42, No. 3, May/Jun. 2003, pp 167-169.
Dayton et al., “Early Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Observational Case Analysis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 3, May/Jun. 2004, pp. 156-159.
Dayton et al., “Dorsal Suspension Stitch: An Alternative Stabilization After Flexor Tenotomy for Flexible Hammer Digit Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 602-605.
Dayton et al., “The Extended Knee Hemilithotomy Position for Gastrocnemius Recession,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 214-216.
Wienke et al., “Bone Stimulation For Nonunions: What the Evidence Reveals,” Podiatry Today, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 52-57.
Dayton et al., “Hallux Varus as Complication of Foot Compartment Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 504-506.
Dayton et al., “Measurement of Mid-Calcaneal Length Plain Radiographs: Reliability of a New Method,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2011, pp. 280-283.
Dayton et al., “A User-Friendly Method of Pin Site Management for External Fixators,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, Sep. 16, 2011, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “Effectiveness of a Locking Plate in Preserving Midcalcaneal Length and Positional Outcome after Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy: A Retrospective Pilot Study,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 710-713.
Dayton et al., “Does Postoperative Showering or Bathing of a Surgical Site Increase the Incidence of Infection? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journalp of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 612-614.
Dayton et al., “Technique for Minimally Invasive Reduction of Calcaneal Fractures Using Small Bilateral External Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Clarification of the Anatomic Definition of the Bunion Deformity,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 160-163.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plante Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 5 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in First Metatarsal and Medial Cuneiform Positions after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 32-35.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermatarsal Angle after First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Reduction of Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014,, pp. 29-31.
Dayton et al., “Principles of Management of Growth Plate Fractures in the Foot and Ankle,” Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Foot Deformities, Oct. 2013, 17 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in Bunion Deformity?, ” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Rodgriguez et al., “Ilizarov method of fixation for the management of pilon and distal tibial fractures in the compromised diabetic patient: A technique guide,” The Foot and Ankle Journal Online, vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, 9 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in the Foot and Ankle with Early Exposure and Showering of Surgical Sites: A Prospective Observation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 173-175.
Catanese et al., “Measuring Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus: When Is the Sesamoid Axial View Necessary,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, 2014, 3 pages.
Dayton et al., “Comparison of Complications for Internal and External Fixation for Charcot Reconstruction: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “A new triplanar paradigm for bunion management,” Lower Extremity Review, Apr. 2015, 9 pages.
Dayton et al., “American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons' Clinical Consensus Statement: Perioperative Prophylactic Antibotic Use in Clean Elective Foot Surgery,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Complications of Metatarsal Suture Techniques for Bunion Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 3 pages.
DeCarbo et al., “The Weil Osteotomy: A Refresher,” Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 191-198.
DeCarbo et al., “Resurfacing Interpositional Arthroplasty for Degenerative Joint Diseas of the First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint,” Podiatry Management, Jan. 2013, pp. 137-142.
DeCarbo et al., “Locking Plates: Do They Prevent Complications?, ” Podiatry Today, Apr. 2014, 7 pages.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part II: Operative Treatment,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 748-758.
Kim et lal., “A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Outcomes for Arthrodesis, Hemi-Metallic Joint Implant, and Resectional Arthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vo. 51, 2012, pp. 50-56.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part I: Pathomechancis, Clinical Assessment, and Nonoperative Management,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 654-659.
Sandhu et al., “Digital Arthrodesis With a One-Piece Memory Nitinol Intramedullary Fixation Device: A Retrospective Review,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 6, No. 5, Oct. 2013, pp. 364-366.
Weber et al., “Use of the First Ray Splay Test to Asses Transverse Plane Instability Before First Metatarsocuneiform Fusion,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 45, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2006, pp. 278-282.
Smith et al., “Opening Wedge Osteotomies for Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Review of Wedge Plate Fixation,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 2, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 277-282.
Easley et al., “What is the Best Treatment for Hallux Valgus?, ” Evidence-Based Orthopaedics—The Best Answers to Clinical Questions, Chapter 73, 2009, 479-491.
Shurnas et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Opening Wedge Osteotomy,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 13, 2011, pp. 73-78.
Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 41 pages.
Prior Art Publications, Exhibit A of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 3 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute (Apr. 2014), Exhibit B1 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 97 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide to the Lapidus Bunionectomy,” HMP Global (Sep. 6, 2013), Exhibit B2 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 67 pages.
Claim Chart for Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” Update 2015: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Podiatry Institute, Chpt. 6, pp. 23-29 (Apr. 2015), Exhibit B3 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 151 pages.
Claim Chart for Mote, “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” The Journal Foot & Ankle Surgery (Sep. 1, 2009), Exhibit B5 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 21 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,268 to Fallin et al., entitled “Indexed Tri-Planar Ostetomy Guide and Method,” Issued Aug. 13, 2019, Exhibit B6 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 155 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,645 to Lawrence et al., entitled “Metatarsal Bone Implant Cutting Guide,” issued Jan. 18, 2010, Exhibit B7 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 76 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,057 to Dacosta et al., entitled “Bone Implants and Cutting Apparatuses and Methods,” issued Apr. 8, 2011, Exhibit B8 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 110 pages.
Obviousness Chart, Exhibit C of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, U.S. District for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 153 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210038212 A1 Feb 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62883649 Aug 2019 US