1. Technical Field
This invention relates to a weaving machine, and more particularly to a bias-weaving machine suitable for forming three-dimensional woven structures.
2. Background Information
The use of textile preforms is well known in the composite industry. Such preforms are commonly fabricated using relatively simple weaving machines that typically produce flat, substantially two-dimensional woven products with yarns extending in only two directions. Such materials are generally formed by interlacing two sets of yarns substantially perpendicularly to each other. In such two-dimensional weaving applications, the 0 degree yarns are referred to as warp yarns, while the 90 degree yarns are referred to as fill yarns. The introduction of bias yarns (e.g., interwoven at 45 degrees, into the weave is also known to produce materials having superior shear strength and off-axis tensile strength.
Three-dimensional preforms are often formed by joining a plurality of two-dimensional woven materials, for example into “T” or “Pi” shapes. Typically, simple two-dimensional woven fabrics are produced by a material supplier and sent to a customer who cuts out patterns and lays up the final preform ply by ply. Such joining operations are typically time and labor intensive and therefore expensive. Moreover, composites formed by such operations are known to sometimes have compromised mechanical properties at the joints and between the various plies. In other applications, a bias cloth may be laid up with three-dimensional woven preforms having only fill and warp yarns. While such a process may reduce time and labor requirements as compared to a full lay-up, it remains expensive. Moreover, delamination between the bias cloth and the woven preforms is a common problem.
One approach to overcome such difficulties in forming three-dimensional woven preforms is to weave the bias yarns among the warp and fill yarns. One attempt to provide such functionality is described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. U.S. 2002/0069927, entitled Three-Dimensional Woven Forms with Integral Bias Fibers and Bias Weaving Loom, published on Jun. 13, 2002 (hereinafter, the '927 application). This approach, however, is not without its drawbacks. Therefore, there exists a need for an improved weaving apparatus for forming three-dimensional woven structures including a plurality of bias yarns, such as those required for advanced composite material applications.
In one aspect the present invention includes an apparatus for interweaving of yarns. The apparatus includes a plurality of yarn carriers, each of which holds a yarn under tension. The yarns extend in a downstream direction from an end supported by the carriers towards a woven product. The apparatus further includes a plurality of reeds disposed to comb the yarns in the downstream direction. The reeds have a range of motion extending between positions upstream and downstream of the yarn carriers. The yarn carriers are translatable in at least one direction other than the downstream direction.
In another aspect, this invention includes an apparatus for the interweaving of yarns. The apparatus includes a plurality of yarn carriers, each of which holds a yarn under tension. The yarns extend in a downstream direction from an end supported by the carriers towards a woven product. The apparatus further includes a shuttle configured to releasably engage at least one of the yarn carriers to translate the engaged yarn carrier(s) relative to at least one other of the yarn carriers in a direction substantially orthogonal to the downstream direction. The shuttle includes a plurality of opposable engagement configured to opposably engage one or more of the plurality of yarn carriers. The engagement members are configured to asynchronously, alternately engage and release the yarn carriers to translate the engaged bias yarn carriers.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The above and other features and advantages of this invention will be more readily apparent from a reading of the following detailed description of various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized. It is also to be understood that structural, procedural and system changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. For clarity of exposition, like features shown in the accompanying drawings are indicated with like reference numerals and similar features as shown in alternate embodiments in the drawings are indicated with similar reference numerals. Moreover, it will also be understood that directional designations such as ‘left’, ‘right’, ‘up’ and ‘down’ are used herein for ease of reference only, and are not intended to be limitations on the invention. The artisan of ordinary skill will of course recognize that the embodiments and portions thereof described herein may be utilized in substantially any orientation, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Exemplary aspects of the present invention are intended to address the above described need for an improved apparatus for interweaving yarns, and in particular for interweaving three-dimensional fiber preforms for fiber composite materials, such as those used in the aerospace industry. Referring briefly to the accompanying figures, exemplary embodiments of this invention include an apparatus having a plurality of warp yarn carriers, a plurality of bias yarn carriers, and a fill yarn shuttle. The bias yarn carriers are translatable in at least one direction other than the downstream direction. Embodiments of the apparatus also include a plurality of reeds disposed to comb the yarns in the downstream direction. The reeds include a range of motion extending between positions upstream and downstream of the bias yarn carriers.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may provide several technical advantages. For example, weaving machines in accordance with this invention may be utilized to fabricate substantially three-dimensional woven products having a plurality of interwoven layers that include bias yarns and therefore exhibit superior strength and stiffness. Moreover, embodiments of this invention may reduce labor and expense requirements in producing three-dimensional woven products including bias yarns. These embodiments also tend to be less complex than prior approaches, which generally provides increased reliability and operational availability.
With reference now to
It will be understood that the warp yarns may be moved using substantially any suitable actuation technique. For example, Jacquard control is one method of forming three-dimensional woven forms. A Jacquard control system advantageously allows individual heddles to be raised and lowered in any combination, rather than only a preset number of combinations determined by the harnesses in the loom. This is illustrated in
Referring again to
With reference now to
With continued reference to
Turning now also to
In this position, both the column pins 216 and 217 are disengaged from the upper 202 and lower 204 grips. As such, the bias carrier 120 in translating row 185 (i.e., the row shown) is supported by both forks 208 and 210. The upper and lower shift bars 222 and 224 are then moved together to the left (along with the forks 208 and 210 which support bias carrier 120) in step 6 as shown at 232. As such, the grips 202 and 204 pass between the column pins 216 and 217. After the completion of step 6 the bias carriers 120 have been moved half way to the adjacent column.
With continued reference to
Upon completion of step 12, the bias carrier 120 has been fully moved to the adjacent column, however, it effectively straddles adjacent pairs of upper 208 and lower 210 forks, and needs to be re-engaged with the corresponding column pins 216 and 217. Thus, in step 13, the column fronts 218 of the adjacent column are moved downwards so that the lower column pins 217 engage upper grip 202 pushing it downward against the bias of spring member 225 so that it disengages upper fork 208. In step 14, the upper fork is moved right to its center position as indicated at 236. In step 15, the column fronts are moved upwards to the uppermost position. The upper column pins 316 engage the lower grip pushing it upwards so that it disengages the lower fork 210. After step 15, the bias carrier 120 is again supported by the column fronts 218. In step 16, the lower fork 210 is returned to the center position directly below the upper fork 208. After step 16 the bias carrier 120 may move vertically in columns 182 as described above. Alternatively, the bias carrier may be moved further to the left by repeating the above-described procedure.
Thus, as described, this embodiment effectively provides a bias shuttle in which opposable engagement members (e.g., upper and lower forks) opposably engage one or more of the plurality of yarn holders. Moreover, these engagement members are configured to asynchronously, alternately engage and release the yarn holders to effectively translate the engaged yarn holders. Furthermore, the engagement members accomplish this by effectively handing off the yarn holders to supports that remain interposed between the warp yarns.
The artisan of ordinary skill will readily recognize that numerous variations on the above-described sequence are possible. For example, the roles of the upper and lower column fronts 218 and the upper 208 and lower 210 forks may be reversed so that the lower forks 210 (rather than the upper forks 208) are moved first in step 2. It will also be appreciated that a right-shift sequence may be established by simply reversing a left-shift sequence and vice-versa.
Proper operation of the device as embodied in
To ensure that even a minimal increase in tension causes the spool 124 to release additional yarn, mechanical advantage may be provided between the floating pulley 127 and the spring 130. In the exemplary embodiment shown on
Additionally, a torsional spring 135 having a relatively small spring constant may be utilized. Furthermore, in the exemplary embodiment shown, the spool 124 is configured to translate along its longitudinal axis so that the release lever 134 urges it against a high friction surface 137 prior to engagement by bead 131. This braking action helps ensure that spool 124 is adequately secured prior to release of additional yarn, yet releases easily when bead 131 engages catch pins 133.
It will be appreciated that the above-described tensioning mechanism operates without applying a frictional or other drag to the bias yarn. The yarn tension is set by the extension of the tensioning spring 130, rather than by applying a fixed resistance to spool 124 to resist yarn pay out. As such, the approach of this embodiment may be used without regard to the variation in torque applied by the yarn to the spool 124 as the spool empties and its' effective diameter decreases. Problems associated with excess spool rotation and slack yarn are advantageously mitigated, and wear and damage of the yarn itself (as might be caused by a drag applied directly to the yarn) are minimized.
With reference now to
The exemplary embodiment shown includes a main plate (or frame) 160 interposed between first and second capture plates 162. The shuttle further includes upper and lower thread guards 155 (upper thread guard 155 is shown in
As described above, reed blades 140 are utilized to comb newly inserted fill 152 and bias 122 yarns up to the edge (also referred to as the fell) of the woven product 105. Exemplary embodiments of this invention utilize a reed blade control apparatus 240 (see, e.g.,
With reference now to
Control apparatus 240 further includes upper and lower drive belts 242 and 243 deployed coaxially about drive pulleys 248. In one advantageous embodiment, the drive belts 242 and 243 include a plurality of teeth (not shown) that are configured to engage with the drive pulleys 248, one of which is driven, for example, by an electric motor. The upper 242 and lower 243 drive belts and the upper 142 and lower 143 cable loops are coupled to common upper 245 and lower 246 drive blocks, with the drive blocks 245 and 246 being driven by the drive belts 242 and 243. The above described arrangement advantageously ensures that the upper and lower drive blocks 245 and 246, and therefore the upper 142 and lower 143 cable loops, are driven together at the same rate. As such, the plurality of reed blades 140 is constrained to move substantially simultaneously. Moreover, since each component in the drive train is positively located with respect to each adjacent component, the position of the reed blades 140 tends to be accurately maintained. It will be appreciated that numerous modifications may be made to the above-described control apparatus 240. For example, multiple drive trains may be utilized to provide independent motion control to various groups of (or individual) reed blades 140.
It will be appreciated that during a typical weaving operation, the reed blades 140 are typically repeatedly moved from a position upstream of the bias carriers 120 to the woven product 105 and back, for example as shown in
In the preceding specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/579,474, entitled Bias Weaving Machine, filed Jun. 14, 2004.
This invention was made with government support under Contract Number F33615-01-C-3145, awarded by the Air Force. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
539405 | Bancroft | May 1895 | A |
3359848 | Ostermann | Dec 1967 | A |
3426804 | Bluck | Feb 1969 | A |
3756533 | De Young | Sep 1973 | A |
3799209 | Dow et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3817147 | Richardson | Jun 1974 | A |
3839939 | Wily | Oct 1974 | A |
4006759 | Darsie | Feb 1977 | A |
4013103 | Kulczycki et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4015637 | Halton et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4031922 | Trost et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4151866 | Gloor | May 1979 | A |
4275638 | DeYoung | Jun 1981 | A |
4312261 | Florentine | Jan 1982 | A |
4380949 | Betta | Apr 1983 | A |
4466469 | Brouwer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4529147 | Bull et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535674 | Bull et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4719837 | McConnell et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4898067 | Ashton et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4922798 | Ivsan et al. | May 1990 | A |
RE33418 | Krueger | Nov 1990 | E |
5067525 | Tsuzuki et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070914 | Fukuta et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5137058 | Anahara et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5188153 | Farley | Feb 1993 | A |
5228481 | Kimbara et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5337647 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5357839 | Brookstein et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5375627 | Iida et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399418 | Hartmanns et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5431193 | Mood et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435352 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5465760 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5501133 | Brookstein et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5540260 | Mood | Jul 1996 | A |
5720320 | Evans | Feb 1998 | A |
5775195 | Haehnel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5775381 | Addis | Jul 1998 | A |
5783279 | Edgson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791384 | Evans | Aug 1998 | A |
5870940 | Kimbara | Feb 1999 | A |
5924459 | Evans | Jul 1999 | A |
5947160 | Addis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6494235 | Bruyere et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
20020069927 | Bryn et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050274426 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60579474 | Jun 2004 | US |